Nathanael Greene and the Myth of the Valiant Few

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nathanael Greene and the Myth of the Valiant Few NATHANAEL GREENE AND THE MYTH OF THE VALIANT FEW David R. Smith Dissertation Prepared for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2017 APPROVED: Guy Chet, Committee Chair Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Committee Member Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard Vedder, Committee Member Harold Tanner, Chair of the Department of History David Holdeman, Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Smith, David R. Nathanael Greene and the Myth of the Valiant Few. Doctor of Philosophy (History), December 2017, 308 pp., 8 maps, bibliography, 38 primary resource titles, 308 secondary resource titles. Nathan Greene is the Revolutionary Warfare general most associated with unconventional warfare. The historiography of the southern campaign of the revolution uniformly agrees he was a guerrilla leader. Best evidence shows, however, that Nathanael Greene was completely conventional -- that his strategy, operations, tactics, and logistics all strongly resembled that of Washington in the northern theater and of the British commanders against whom he fought in the south. By establishing that Greene was within the mainstream of eighteenth-century military science this dissertation also challenges the prevailing historiography of the American Revolution in general, especially its military aspects. The historiography overwhelmingly argues the myth of the valiant few -- the notion that a minority of colonists persuaded an apathetic majority to follow them in overthrowing the royal government, eking out an improbable victory. Broad and thorough research indicates the Patriot faction in the American Revolution was a clear majority not only throughout the colonies but in each individual colony. Far from the miraculous victory current historiography postulates, American independence was based on the most prosaic of principles -- manpower advantage. Copyright 2017 by David R. Smith ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to thank Dr. Guy Chet for his advice and leadership during the preparation of this dissertation. I also want to thank the members of my dissertation committee for their time and input: Dr. Christopher Fuhrmann, Dr. Richard McCaslin, Dr. Walter Roberts, and Dr. Richard Vedder. In addition, I want to thank Dr. Roberts for his initial willingness to take a chance on me and his guidance during my early semesters in the department. Nothing required him to take that chance, and the opportunity it gave me is one for which I will always be grateful. I would also like to thank Dr. Robert Citino for his service on my board during my comprehensive examinations. All maps not otherwise acknowledged are courtesy of the Department of History, United States Military Academy at West Point. The map of the Territorial Departments of the Continental Army on page 72 is from The Continental Army, by Robert K. Wright, Jr., published by the Center for Military History. The map on page 151 is courtesy of the Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division. I dedicate this dissertation to the two greatest women I have ever known: Vickie Lynn Swaringen Smith – who made it possible and Kellye Renae Guinn Smith – who made it worthwhile. Between the two of them, God never blessed any man more than he has blessed me. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF MAPS ................................................................................................................................... v CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2. PROLOGUE: THE EARLY YEARS ................................................................................. 25 CHAPTER 3. CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS ....................................................................................... 31 Civilian Control of the Military .......................................................................................... 32 Induction and Desertion ................................................................................................... 48 Civilians in the War Zone .................................................................................................. 60 CHAPTER 4. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION ................................................................... 68 CHAPTER 5. LEADERSHIP AND TRAINING ..................................................................................... 92 Leadership ......................................................................................................................... 93 Training ........................................................................................................................... 100 CHAPTER 6. LOGISTICS ................................................................................................................ 107 CHAPTER 7. INTELLIGENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................ 127 Intelligence, Counter Intelligence, and Security ............................................................. 127 Command and Control .................................................................................................... 142 CHAPTER 8. STRATEGY ................................................................................................................ 156 CHAPTER 9. OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................... 182 CHAPTER 10. TACTICS ................................................................................................................. 208 CHAPTER 11. SOUTH CAROLINA: A CASE STUDY ........................................................................ 225 CHAPTER 12. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 255 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................ 286 iv LIST OF MAPS Page MAP 1: Continental Army Territorial Departments ..................................................................... 75 MAP 2: The Battle of Guilford Courthouse ................................................................................. 150 MAP 3: Map of North America showing the Proclamation Line of 1763 .................................. 159 MAP 4: Population Density in the Thirteen Colonies, 1775 ...................................................... 161 MAP 5: The War in the South, 1781 .......................................................................................... 172 MAP 6: Operations in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania May 1777-July1778 ............. 188 MAP 7: The War in the South, 1781 .......................................................................................... 192 MAP 8: Battle of Guilford Courthouse ....................................................................................... 210 v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Nathanael Greene emerged into the historical limelight in a starring role, Revolutionary War general. Most Patriot generals served in the French and Indian War, the Indian wars, or both. Greene’s only military experience prior to the American Revolution was local militia training. He began the war as a private, was almost immediately promoted to brigadier general, and with only one significant lapse performed well at every position he held, command or staff. Such inexperience was unusual but not unheard of for a person who attained Greene’s stature. This dissertation is not a biography of Greene in the traditional sense, or even a military biography. Rather, it examines individual aspects of Greene’s military practice, showing that all were well within the mainstream of eighteenth-century warfare. In the process, it proves that Greene, although an excellent general, succeeded primarily because he held a significant manpower advantage over his enemy. Several twentieth-century historians argue that Greene’s southern operations were significantly different from those that Continental Army Commander-in-Chief George Washington or Major General Horatio Gates conducted in the north. These scholars suggest Greene was an innovator who brought new insights to eighteenth-century military campaigns. According to them, Greene’s military operations resembled modern irregular warfare, and Greene was a harbinger of modern guerrilla tactics.1 Other historians hail Greene’s 1 John Morgan Dederer, “Making Bricks without Straw: Nathanael Greene’s Southern Campaigns and Mao Tse- Tung’s Mobile War,” Military Affairs 47:3 (1983): 115-117; Steven E. Siry, Greene: Revolutionary General (Washington: Potomac Books, Inc., 2006), xii, 64-65; Don Higginbotham, “Some Reflections on the South in the 1 achievements without focusing on his methods – they point out that Greene was General Washington’s best subordinate commander and that he excelled in administrative ability and civil-military relations2 – but they generally accept the judgment that as a commander, Greene was an original and innovative military mind, who foreshadowed various elements of modern warfare. This dissertation does not dispute Greene’s competence; what this dissertation challenges is the notion that Greene was unconventional. Most American Revolution historians writing on the southern campaign focus
Recommended publications
  • The History of the American Revolution, Vol. 1 [1789]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. David Ramsay, The History of the American Revolution, vol. 1 [1789] The Online Library Of Liberty Collection This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, foundation established to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, or to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 900 books and other material and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and Web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected]. LIBERTY FUND, INC. 8335 Allison Pointe Trail, Suite 300 Indianapolis, Indiana 46250-1684 Online Library of Liberty: The History of the American Revolution, vol. 1 Edition Used: The History of the American Revolution, Foreword by Lester H.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Memorial Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum Assessment of Effects
    World War I Memorial Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum Assessment of Effects Prepared for: National Park Service National Mall and Memorial Parks 900 Ohio Drive SW Washington, DC 20024 On behalf of: The United States World War One Centennial Commission Prepared by: Rachel Lloyd, Historic Landscape Architect Lauren Tuttle, Planner Claire Sale, Project Manager 3101 Wilson Boulevard Suite 900 Arlington, VA 22201 December 2018 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum Final Assessment of Effects World War I Memorial Prepared for: National Park Service National Mall and Memorial Parks 900 Ohio Drive SW Washington, DC On behalf of: The United States World War One Centennial Commission Prepared by: Rachel Lloyd, Historic Landscape Architect Lauren Tuttle, Planner Claire Sale, Project Manager 3101 Wilson Blvd. Suite 900 Arlington, Virginia 22201 December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................2 2.1 Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Area of Potential Effect ........................................................................................ 7 3. HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF THE WORLD WAR I MEMORIAL SITE ........................... 9 4. EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRITISH ARMY in the LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 By
    ‘FAIRLY OUT-GENERALLED AND DISGRACEFULLY BEATEN’: THE BRITISH ARMY IN THE LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 by ANDREW ROBERT LIMM A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. University of Birmingham School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law October, 2014. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The history of the British Army in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars is generally associated with stories of British military victory and the campaigns of the Duke of Wellington. An intrinsic aspect of the historiography is the argument that, following British defeat in the Low Countries in 1795, the Army was transformed by the military reforms of His Royal Highness, Frederick Duke of York. This thesis provides a critical appraisal of the reform process with reference to the organisation, structure, ethos and learning capabilities of the British Army and evaluates the impact of the reforms upon British military performance in the Low Countries, in the period 1793 to 1814, via a series of narrative reconstructions. This thesis directly challenges the transformation argument and provides a re-evaluation of British military competency in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Deprived of Their Liberty'
    'DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY': ENEMY PRISONERS AND THE CULTURE OF WAR IN REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA, 1775-1783 by Trenton Cole Jones A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June, 2014 © 2014 Trenton Cole Jones All Rights Reserved Abstract Deprived of Their Liberty explores Americans' changing conceptions of legitimate wartime violence by analyzing how the revolutionaries treated their captured enemies, and by asking what their treatment can tell us about the American Revolution more broadly. I suggest that at the commencement of conflict, the revolutionary leadership sought to contain the violence of war according to the prevailing customs of warfare in Europe. These rules of war—or to phrase it differently, the cultural norms of war— emphasized restricting the violence of war to the battlefield and treating enemy prisoners humanely. Only six years later, however, captured British soldiers and seamen, as well as civilian loyalists, languished on board noisome prison ships in Massachusetts and New York, in the lead mines of Connecticut, the jails of Pennsylvania, and the camps of Virginia and Maryland, where they were deprived of their liberty and often their lives by the very government purporting to defend those inalienable rights. My dissertation explores this curious, and heretofore largely unrecognized, transformation in the revolutionaries' conduct of war by looking at the experience of captivity in American hands. Throughout the dissertation, I suggest three principal factors to account for the escalation of violence during the war. From the onset of hostilities, the revolutionaries encountered an obstinate enemy that denied them the status of legitimate combatants, labeling them as rebels and traitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gaspee Affair As Conspiracy by Lawrence J
    The Gaspee Affair as Conspiracy By Lawrence J. DeVaro, Jr. Rhode Island History, October 1973, pp. 106-121 Digitized and reformatted from .pdf available on-line courtesy RI Historical Society at: http://www.rihs.org/assetts/files/publications/1973_Oct.pdf On the afternoon of June 9, 1772, His Majesty's schooner Gaspee grounded on a shoal called Namquit Point in Narragansett Bay. From the time of their arrival in Rhode Island's waters in February, the Gaspee and her commander, Lieutenant William Dudingston, had been the cause of much commercial frustration of local merchants. Dudingston was insolent, described by one local newspaper as more imperious and haughty than the Grand Turk himself. Past accounts of his pettish nature followed him from port to port.[1] The lieutenant was also shrewd. Aware that owners of seized vessels — rather than navy captains deputized in the customs service — would triumph in any cause brought before Rhode Island's vice-admiralty court, Dudingston had favored the district vice-admiralty court at Boston instead, an option available to customs officials since 1768.[2] Aside from threatening property of Rhode Islanders through possible condemnation of seizures, utilization of the court at Boston invigorated opposition to trials out of the vicinage, a grievance which had irritated merchants within the colony for some time.[3] Finally the lieutenant was zealous — determined to be a conscientious customs officer even if it meant threatening Rhode Island's flourishing illicit trade in non-British, West-Indian molasses. Governor Joseph Wanton of Rhode Island observed that Dudingston also hounded little packet boats as they plied their way between Newport and Providence.
    [Show full text]
  • “Extracts from Some Rebel Papers”: Patriots, Loyalists, and the Perils of Wartime Printing
    1 “Extracts from some Rebel Papers”: Patriots, Loyalists, and the Perils of Wartime Printing Joseph M. Adelman National Endowment for the Humanities Fellow American Antiquarian Society Presented to the Joint Seminar of the McNeil Center for Early American Studies And the Program in Early American Economy and Society, LCP Library Company of Philadelphia, 1314 Locust Street, Philadelphia 24 February 2012 3-5 p.m. *** DRAFT: Please do not cite, quote, or distribute without permission of the author. *** 2 The eight years of the Revolutionary War were difficult for the printing trade. After over a decade of growth and increasing entanglement among printers as their networks evolved from commercial lifelines to the pathways of political protest, the fissures of the war dispersed printers geographically and cut them off from their peers. Maintaining commercial success became increasingly complicated as demand for printed matter dropped, except for government printing, and supply shortages crippled communications networks and hampered printers’ ability to produce and distribute anything that came off their presses. Yet even in their diminished state, printers and their networks remained central not only to keeping open lines of communication among governments, armies, and civilians, but also in shaping public opinion about the central ideological issues of the war, the outcomes of battles, and the meaning of events affecting the war in North America and throughout the Atlantic world. What happened to printers and their networks is of vital importance for understanding the Revolution. The texts that historians rely on, from Common Sense and The Crisis to rural newspapers, almanacs, and even diaries and correspondence, were shaped by the commercial and political forces that printers navigated as they produced printed matter that defined the scope of debate and the nature of the discussion about the war.
    [Show full text]
  • David Library of the American Revolution Guide to Microform Holdings
    DAVID LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GUIDE TO MICROFORM HOLDINGS Adams, Samuel (1722-1803). Papers, 1635-1826. 5 reels. Includes papers and correspondence of the Massachusetts patriot, organizer of resistance to British rule, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Revolutionary statesman. Includes calendar on final reel. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 674] Adams, Dr. Samuel. Diaries, 1758-1819. 2 reels. Diaries, letters, and anatomy commonplace book of the Massachusetts physician who served in the Continental Artillery during the Revolution. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 380] Alexander, William (1726-1783). Selected papers, 1767-1782. 1 reel. William Alexander, also known as “Lord Sterling,” first served as colonel of the 1st NJ Regiment. In 1776 he was appointed brigadier general and took command of the defense of New York City as well as serving as an advisor to General Washington. He was promoted to major- general in 1777. Papers consist of correspondence, military orders and reports, and bulletins to the Continental Congress. Originals are in the New York Historical Society. [FILM 404] American Army (Continental, militia, volunteer). See: United States. National Archives. Compiled Service Records of Soldiers Who Served in the American Army During the Revolutionary War. United States. National Archives. General Index to the Compiled Military Service Records of Revolutionary War Soldiers. United States. National Archives. Records of the Adjutant General’s Office. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty and Warrant Application Files. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Rolls. 1775-1783. American Periodicals Series I. 33 reels. Accompanied by a guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 7-1: the Revolution Begins
    Name: Date: Chapter 7 Study Guide Section 7-1: The Revolution Begins Fill in the blanks: 1. The First Continental Congress was a meeting of delegates from various colonies in September of 1774 to discuss the ongoing crisis with Britain. 2. The Minutemen were members of the Massachusetts militia that were considered ready to fight at a moment’s notice. 3. General Thomas Gage was the British military governor of Massachusetts, and ordered the seizure of the militia’s weapons, ammunition, and supplies at Concord. 4. The towns of Lexington and Concord saw the first fighting of the American Revolution. 5. The “Shot heard ‘round the world” was the nickname given to the first shot of the American Revolution. 6. Americans (and others) referred to British soldiers as Redcoats because of their brightly colored uniforms. 7. At the Second Continental Congress, colonial delegates voted to send the Olive Branch Petition to King George III and created an army led by George Washington. 8. The Continental Congress created the Continental Army to defend the colonies against British aggression. 9. George Washington took command of this army at the request of the Continental Congress. 10. The Continental Congress chose to send the Olive Branch Petition to King George III and Parliament, reiterating their desire for a peaceful resolution to the crisis. 11. Siege is a military term that means to surround a city or fortress with the goal of forcing the inhabitants to surrender due to a lack of supplies. 12. Benedict Arnold and Ethan Allan captured Fort Ticonderoga in New York, allowing George Washington to obtain much needed supplies and weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • VALLEY FORGE ORDERLY BOOK of General GEORGE WEEDON Of
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from The Library of Congress http://www.archive.org/details/valleyforgeorderOOweed Valley Forge Orderly Book HIS BOOK IS LIMITED TO AN EDITION OF TWO HUNDRED T AND FIFTY-FIVE COPIES VIS- i+vr VALLEY FORGE ORDERLY BOOK of General GEORGE WEEDON of 1 the Continental Army under Command of Gen . George Washington, in the Campaign of 1777-8 Defcribing the Events of the Battles of Brandywine, Warren Tavern, Germantown, and Whitemarjh, and of the Camps at Nejhaminy, Wilmington, Penny- packer s Mills, Skippack, Whitemarfh, £s? Valley Forge NEW YORK: DODD, MEAD AND COMPANY • MDCCCCII £1233 Copy £ THE U8H ,RY CF COimORESS, Two'OoP.ea RtCEIVED DEC. ill 1902 Oop^-hiqhT ENTRV Avut-. t£~- ?ft7~ CLASS ^XXo. No. COPY A. ' Copyright, 1902, By DODD, MEAD & COMPANY First Edition Published December, 1 90a UNIVERSITY PRESS • JOHN WILSON AND SON • CAMBRIDGE, U. S. A. ORDERLY BOOK Illustrations Disposition of the American Army for battle, at Germantown, Oct. 4th, 1777 Frontispiece Disposition of the troops at Mount Holly Facing 142 Order of battle, Dec. 3rd, 1777 . " 146 ORDERLY BOOK VALLEY FORGE ORDERLY BOOK Prefatory Note EN. GEORGE WEEDON, whose orderly book during the campaign of 1777-78 is herewith for the first time published, at the beginning of the war of the Revolution was an innkeeper, living in Fredericksburg, Virginia, where he was born in 1730, and where he died in 1790. He entered the service early, and was commis- sioned Lieutenant Colonel of the Third Virginia regiment in February, 1776, and later held the same rank in the First Virginia Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island History Winter/Spring 2009 Volume 67, Number 1
    Rhode Island History Winter/Spring 2009 Volume 67, Number 1 Published by The Rhode Island Historical Society Contents 110 Benevolent Street Providence, Rhode Island 02906-3152 Cato Pearce’s Memoir: A Rhode Island Slave Narrative 3 Robert J. Manning, president William S. Simmons, first vice president Christian M. McBurney Barbara J. Thornton, second vice president Peter J. Miniati, treasurer Robert G. Flanders Jr., secretary Bernard P. Fishman, director The Forgotten Ships of the Battle of Rhode Island: Some Unpublished Documents 27 Fellow of the society Glenn W. LaFantasie D. K. Abbass Publications Committee Luther Spoehr, chair James Findlay Robert Allen Greene Robert W. Hayman Jane Lancaster J. Stanley Lemons William McKenzie Woodward Staff Elizabeth C. Stevens, editor Hilliard Beller, copy editor Silvia Rees, publications assistant The Rhode Island Historical Society assumes no responsibility for the opinions of contributors. RHODE ISLAND HISTORY is published two times a year by the Rhode Island Historical Society at 110 Benevolent Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02906-3152. Postage is paid at Providence, Rhode Island. Society members receive each issue as a membership benefit. Institutional subscriptions to RHODE ISLAND HISTORY are $25.00 annually. Individual copies of current and back issues are available from the Society for $8.00 (price includes postage and handling). Manuscripts and other ©2009 by The Rhode Island Historical Society correspondence should be sent to Dr. Elizabeth C. Stevens, editor, at the RHODE ISLAND HISTORY (ISSN 0035-4619) Society or to [email protected]. Christian McBurney, an independent historian, is a partner with the law firm of Nixon Peabody LLP in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas During the American Revolution Daniel S
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-11-2019 Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution Daniel S. Soucier University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Soucier, Daniel S., "Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2992. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2992 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVIGATING WILDERNESS AND BORDERLAND: ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE IN THE NORTHEASTERN AMERICAS DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION By Daniel S. Soucier B.A. University of Maine, 2011 M.A. University of Maine, 2013 C.A.S. University of Maine, 2016 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School University of Maine May, 2019 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-Adviser Liam Riordan, Professor of History, Co-Adviser Stephen Miller, Professor of History Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology and Canadian Studies DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Daniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalists in War, Americans in Peace: the Reintegration of the Loyalists, 1775-1800
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 Aaron N. Coleman University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Coleman, Aaron N., "LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800" (2008). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 620. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/620 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERATION Aaron N. Coleman The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 _________________________________________________ ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION _________________________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Aaron N. Coleman Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Daniel Blake Smith, Professor of History Lexington, Kentucky 2008 Copyright © Aaron N. Coleman 2008 iv ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 After the American Revolution a number of Loyalists, those colonial Americans who remained loyal to England during the War for Independence, did not relocate to the other dominions of the British Empire.
    [Show full text]