1 De Gaulle in London and the Formation of Free France, 1940-42

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 De Gaulle in London and the Formation of Free France, 1940-42 Notes 1 De Gaulle in London and the Formation of Free France, 1940-42 1. Edward Spears, Assignment to Catastrophe, I (London, 1954 ), 254. 2. On 18 June 1940 Petain authorised the transfer of part of the government to North Africa. In the end this was not done. Only 26 deputies and one senator left on 21 June with official authorisation from the government. Included in that number were most major opponents to the Armistice. Upon arrival in Casablanca, once again by order of the government, they were placed under virtual house arrest. In one stroke Petain had neutralised most of his opposition. 3. For more on the de Gaulle/Petain relationship see Marc Ferro, Petain (Paris, 1987) and Rene Remond, 'Two Destinies: Petain and De Gaulle' in Hugh Gough and John Horne (eds) De Gaulle and Twentieth Century France (London, 1994). 4. Generally called by the French 'Mers-el-Kebir'. 5. Rene Cassin, Des hommes partis de rien (Paris, 1974) 77. 6. Cassin to Rene Pleven, 25 Sept 1940, 382AP/31, Cassin Papers, Archives Nationaies, Paris (henceforth cited as AN). 7. This quotation is from de Gaulle, War Memoirs, I: The Call to Honour, 1940-42 (Paris, 1954, Eng. trans. London, 1955). 8. Speech given at the White City, London, 27 July 1940, in Philippe de Gaulle (ed.), Lettres, notes et carnets, juin 1940-juillet 1941 (Paris, 1981) 60 (henceforth cited as Lettres ... ). 9. Cassin Diary, entry for 26 June 1940, 382AP/27, Cassin Papers, AN. 10. Henceforth, persons who assumed aliases will be listed under both their assumed name and their real name. The alias will be placed in italics (for example, Capt. Passy-Dewavrin). The main exception to this rule will be for Philippe Leclerc-de Hautecloque, who was - and still is - universally known simply as Leclerc. II. This will be considered in more detail in Chapter 8, where Indochina is discussed. 12. Report on Free French forces in Great Britain, F0892/7, Public Record Office, Kew (henceforth cited as PRO). 13. The standard history is A. 1. Marder, Operation Menace (Oxford, 1976). 14. See, for example, de Gaulle to Churchill, 7 Aug 1940, Lettres . .. ,juin 1940- juillet 1941,73-4. In fact, part of de Gaulle's agreement with the British Government in August 1940 was that Parliament would enact a law that would allow members of the Free French to acquire British nationality. See Halifax to Sir John Anderson, 30 Sept 1940, Prem 4/14/5, PRO. 15. For more on this see Rene Cassin to Adrien Tixier, 16 Feb 1942, 382AP/ 59, Cassin Papers, AN. 16. Cassin to Pleven, 25 Sept 1940, 382AP/31, Cassin Papers, AN. 17. Meeting, 17 June 1940, War Cabinet conclusions, Cab 65n, PRO. 170 Notes 171 18. Entry, 18 June 1940, in John Colville, The Fringes ofPower: Downing Street Diaries 1939-1955 (London, 1985) 164. 19. Entry, 18 February 1941, David Dilks (ed.), The Cadogan Diaries 1938- 1945 (London, 1971) 355. 20. Parr to Eden, 26 July 1941, FO 892/78, PRO. 21. Cabinet conclusions, 28 June 1940; Cab 65/7, PRO. 22. The debate on this question is in the conclusions of the War Cabinet meet­ ings of 13 July 1940 and 15 July 1940, Cab 65/8. 23. Memorandum by the Foreign Office on relations with General de Gaulle, dated 7 Aug 1943, in WP (44) 288, 1 June 1944, Cab 66/50, PRO. 24. Entry, 3 Jan 1941, Dilks, 346. Cadogan went so far as to ring up a friend at the Home Office to ask him to make Muselier as comfortable as possible. 25. Record of conversation between the Prime Minister and General de Gaulle, 9 Jan 1941, FO 954/8, Eden Papers, PRO. 26. All of this correspondence is contained in Prem 3/120/4, PRO. 27. Entry for 26 Sept 1941, Dilks (ed.) 407. Although his name is not given in the published text, Cadogan was obviously referring to Bessborough. 28. Eden to Churchill, 26 Sept 1941, Prem 3/120/4, PRO. 29. Desmond Morton to Prime Minister, 10 July 1940, Prem 7/2, PRO. 2 Free France and the United States, 1940-42 1. Leahy to Roosevelt, 22 Nov 1941, printed in Leahy, 1 Was There (New York, 1950) 470. 2. Leahy to Roosevelt, 26 Aug 1941, Leahy, 463. 3. The 'shield' theory of Vichy was for a long time the generally accepted one amongst French historians. This concept was exploded by the American Robert Paxton in his book Vichy France: Old Guard and New Order (New York, 1972). 4. Roosevelt to Edwin Wilson, American representative to the French Com­ mittee, 5 Jan 1944, President's Secretary's File, France 1944-45, Franklin D. Roosevelt Library, Hyde Park, New York (henceforth cited as FDRL). 5. Leahy, 27. 6. Unofficial conversation between Baudet and Matthews, 8 June 1942, Guerre 1939-45, Londres, CNF, file no. 209, Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres, Paris (henceforth cited as MAE). 7. N.a.,4 Nov 1942,851.01/748, State Dept Papers, National Archives, Wash­ ington, D.C. (henceforth cited as NA). 8. See, for example, Tixier's reports to the National Commissary of Foreign Affairs, 10 June 1942, vol. 11 and 21 Nov 1942, vol. 210, MAE. 9. See reports from early 1941 in FO 371/28319, PRO. 10. Interrogatoire N° 3975, 31 July 1941, 382/AP/63, Cassin Papers, AN. 11. This correspondence is in FO 371/28319, PRO. 12. De Gaulle to Sieyes, N" 3722, 15 May 1941, FO 371/28320, PRO. 13. De Gaulle to Jacques de Sieyes, N" 3958, 24 May 1941, FO 371/28321, PRO. 14. Somerville Smith to Mack, 7 June 1941, FO 371/28321, PRO. 15. Ibid. 172 Notes 16. See memorandum by Somerville Smith to Desmond Morton, 16 May 1941, and attached minutes by Foreign Office officials, FO 371/28320. 17. De Gaulle to de Sieyes, 2 June 1941, Lettres .. ,juin 1940-juillet 1941, 346. 18. De Gaulle to Pleven, 20 May 1941, W 150, Guerre 1939-45, Londres/ Alger, CNF, vol. 211, MAE. 19. This correspondence is contained in FO 371/28323, PRO. 20. See Pleven to de Gaulle, 2 Aug 1941, 382/AP/51, Cassin Papers, AN. 21. Report by Harold Mack on a conversation with Anthony Biddle, 28 May 1941, FO 371/28321; for Biddle's reports to the State Department, see, among others, 740.0011 EWI939/13148, 15460, 15921. and 23039. State Department Papers. NA; For the Burman/Biddle correspondence and Brit­ ish commentaries on it. see FO 371/28320. PRO. 22. Mallon to Hull, 20 Oct 1941. W 251. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1941,11, Europe (Washington. 1959) 580-1 (henceforth all volumes of this series will be cited as FRUS). 23. Cunningham to de Gaulle, 25 Nov 1941. 382/AP/60/1. AN. 24. De Gaulle to Halifax for Free French delegation. 22 Jan 1942. Londres/ Alger, vol. 109. MAE. 25. De Gaulle to Muselier and Colonel Fontaine, 18 Sept 1940. Spears Papers 2/6. Churchill College Cambridge (henceforth cited as CCAC); Morton to Prime Minister, 29 Nov 1940. Prem 7/3, PRO. The standard study is Doug­ las Anglin. The St Pierre and Miquelon Affaire (Toronto, 1966). 26. Hull. The Memoirs of Cordell Hull (New York. 1948) 1135-6. 27. Hopkins in a private memorandum, Robert Sherwood, Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History (New York. 1948) 484. 28. The best analysis of the events in New Caledonia is Kim Mulholland. 'The Trials of the Free French in New Caledonia, 1940-1942'. in French His­ torical Studies (Fall, 1986). 29. Minutes of7th Meeting of Combined Chiefs of Staff, 21 Feb 1942, RG 165. ABC 336 New Caledonia. Box 246. National Archives. Washington. D.C. 30. Patch to Marshall. 21 April 1942, N° NR-9, Ibid. 31. De Gaulle to d' Argenlieu. 8 April 1942. Lettres ... ,juillet 1941-juin 1943. 243. 32. Patch to Marshall. 6 and 7 May 1942 in RG 165, ABC 336 New Caledonia. Box 246. NA. 33. De Gaulle to Contre-Amiral Cabanier. 9 May 1942. Lettres . .. ,juillet 1941- juin 1943. 260-61 and British Air Ministry to Joint Staff Mission. Wash­ ington. 9 May 1942. WO 193/129. PRO. 34. De Gaulle to d'Argenlieu, 11 May 1942, Lettres ... ,juillet 1941-juin 1943. 261. 35. Memorandum of a conversation with Tixier by Berle. 30 April 1942, 851.00/ 3039. State Department Papers. NA. 36. See Hoover's reports in the State Department files: 851.00 and 851.01 at the National Archives in Washington. 37. No author, 29 May 1942. 851.01/558. State Department Papers, NA. See also Raoul Aglion. Roosevelt and de Gaulle: Allies in Conflict (NY. 1988). 38. Sumner Welles hated Tixier so much that he actually asked Roosevelt to request the Free French to transfer him. Fortunately. he was dissuaded from Notes 173 this idea and instead asked Halifax to ask Eden to talk to Massigli. This correspondence is contained in the Hopkins Papers, Sherwood Collection, }lox 330, Book 7, Post-Casablanca Files. 39. Berle to Dunn, 30 April 1942, 851.00/3040, State Department Papers, NA. 40. Report by Division of Near Eastern Affairs, State Department, 5 Sept 1942, RG 218, US Joint Chiefs of Staff Geographical File 1942-45,000.1 Free French (9 May ~942), NA. 41. De Gaulle to Cassin, 8 July 1941. Lettres . .. ,juin 1940-juillet 1941,384-5. 42. Memorandum by the French National Committee, 15 June 1942 and memo­ randum of a conversation with Adrien Tixier by Adolf Berle, both in 851.01/ 850112, State Department Papers, NA. When de Gaulle, at the Hotel de Ville on 26 August 1944, gave his famous reply to Georges Bidault's re­ quest that he proclaim the Fourth Republic (,No, the Republic has never ceased to exist'), he meant exactly what he said.
Recommended publications
  • An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421
    An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421 Hugues Canuel On se souvient aujourd’hui des forces de la France libre en raison de faits d’armes tels que leur courageuse résistance à Bir Hakeim en 1942 et la participation du général Leclerc à la libération de Paris en 1944. Par contre, la contribution antérieure de la marine de la France libre est moins bien connue : elle a donné à de Gaulle, dont l’espoir était alors bien mince, les moyens de mobiliser des appuis politiques au sein de l’empire colonial français et d’apporter une contribution militaire précoce à la cause des Alliés. Cette capacité s’est développée à la suite de l’appui modeste mais tout de même essentiel du Royaume-Uni, un allié qui se méfiait de fournir les ressources absolument nécessaires à une flotte qu’il ne contrôlait pas complètement mais dont les actions pourraient aider la Grande- Bretagne qui se trouvait alors presque seule contre les puissances de l’Axe. Friday 27 November 1942 marked the nadir of French sea power in the twentieth century. Forewarned that German troops arrayed around the Mediterranean base of Toulon were intent on seizing the fleet at dawn, Admiral Jean de Laborde – Commander of the Force de Haute Mer, the High Seas Force – and the local Maritime Prefect, Vice Admiral André Marquis, ordered the immediate scuttling of all ships and submarines at their berths. Some 248,800 tons of capital ships, escorts, auxiliaries and submarines was scuttled as the Wehrmacht closed in on the dockyard.2 The French “Vichy navy” virtually ceased to exist that day.
    [Show full text]
  • Bordeaux Pendant L'occupation
    Cours du 22 octobre 2015 BORDEAUX PENDANT L’OCCUPATION I° – La débacle Juin 1940: l'exode vers Bordeaux : alors que l’armée allemande progresse, les autorités françaises battent en retraite. Bordeaux paraît alors hors de portée de la Wehrmacht. En quelques heures, la ville, sous la poussée de l’exode, est envahie et la cohue s’installe. Ministres, parlementaires, fonctionnaires, entreprises... et des centaines de milliers de réfugiés déferlent. En quelques semaines, la population bordelaise passe de 300 000 à 1 million d’habitants. La ville se transforme en une cohue indescriptible. Des milliers de véhicules, de voitures à cheval, de charrettes à bras et de bicyclettes, surchargés de valises, de cartons, de baluchons mal ficelés surmontés de matelas fixés tant bien que mal pour protéger des mitraillages, traversent l’unique pont de Bordeaux. Bordeaux. Le Pont de Pierre. Juin 1940. Les réfugiés envahissent les rues, le port ou stationnent 400 bateaux et bivouaquent dans les parcs et sur les trottoirs. Plus d’un million de repas sont distribués quotidiennement. Mais la pénurie menace, l’eau est rationnée, les hébergements, même de fortune, font défaut. La débâcle frappe également les entreprises : on trouve les 4 000 employés de Peugeot de Sochaux, le personnel de la banque de France avec les réserves en devises, or, titres et valeurs… 1 Les réfugiés attendant à la gare Saint-Jean 2 Bordeaux, capitale de la France : à partir du 14 juin, le gouvernement et l’appareil d’état arrivent de Touraine, de moins en moins sûre. Après la Commune en 1870-1871 et 1914, Bordeaux s’improvise capitale de la France pour la 3 e fois de son histoire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demarcation Line
    No.7 “Remembrance and Citizenship” series THE DEMARCATION LINE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE General Secretariat for Administration DIRECTORATE OF MEMORY, HERITAGE AND ARCHIVES Musée de la Résistance Nationale - Champigny The demarcation line in Chalon. The line was marked out in a variety of ways, from sentry boxes… In compliance with the terms of the Franco-German Armistice Convention signed in Rethondes on 22 June 1940, Metropolitan France was divided up on 25 June to create two main zones on either side of an arbitrary abstract line that cut across départements, municipalities, fields and woods. The line was to undergo various modifications over time, dictated by the occupying power’s whims and requirements. Starting from the Spanish border near the municipality of Arnéguy in the département of Basses-Pyrénées (present-day Pyrénées-Atlantiques), the demarcation line continued via Mont-de-Marsan, Libourne, Confolens and Loches, making its way to the north of the département of Indre before turning east and crossing Vierzon, Saint-Amand- Montrond, Moulins, Charolles and Dole to end at the Swiss border near the municipality of Gex. The division created a German-occupied northern zone covering just over half the territory and a free zone to the south, commonly referred to as “zone nono” (for “non- occupied”), with Vichy as its “capital”. The Germans kept the entire Atlantic coast for themselves along with the main industrial regions. In addition, by enacting a whole series of measures designed to restrict movement of people, goods and postal traffic between the two zones, they provided themselves with a means of pressure they could exert at will.
    [Show full text]
  • James Barr, a Line in the Sand: the Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, – (New York and London
    Book Reviews / Bustan: The Middle East Book Review () – James Barr, A Line in the Sand: The Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, – (New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, ), pp. ISBN ---- ALineintheSand, which looks at the overt and covert Anglo-French struggle in the Middle East from the Sykes-Picot Agreement in to the war in Palestine, is worth reading because of its subject and the archival sources it utilizes. In the prologue to his book, James Barr, a journalist by profession, dramatically describes how in the summer of , his eyes “bulged” when he came across a report from early , written by an MI security officer. The officer, recently returned from the Middle East, alleged that the French authorities in the Levant were arming and financing “Jewish terrorists” fighting against British forces in Palestine. That information had been given to him by an MI officer who in turn claimed that it came from a “Top Secret” source. Barr concludes that “while the British were fighting and dying alongside the Americans to liberate France, their supposed allies the French were secretly backing Jewish efforts to kill British soldiers and officials in Palestine.” The history of the rivalry between France and Britain for dominance in the region is well known. Barr offers a long catalogue of imperial feuding, machinations, intrigues and back-stabbing by two ostensibly allied powers. He lays the blame evenly on France and Britain, but it would have been more accurate to study those relations as three decades of Britain’s persistent efforts to renege on the commitments it made to France in the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIA CONTEMPORÁNEA - Programa 2015
    1 HISTORIA CONTEMPORÁNEA - Programa 2015 Profesor Adjunto a cargo de la cátedra: Dr. Daniel F. Gaido Profesores Asistentes: Dr. Carlos Mignon y Lic. Jorge Santarrosa PRESENTACIÓN: En el marco del curso se estudiará la historia de Europa en los siglos XIX y XX tomando como eje el desarrollo del capitalismo, centrándose en las luchas de clases que el capitalismo genera y que constituyen la base de su historia política. Por tal motivo se pondrá énfasis en el análisis de los procesos revolucionarios, donde tales luchas, usualmente soterradas, se manifiestan con claridad. El curso abordará temas tales como el ciclo de las revoluciones burguesas, la formación de los estados nacionales, el ascenso de la democracia parlamentaria, el desarrollo del movimiento obrero, las ideologías de izquierda (anarquismo, socialismo y comunismo), el surgimiento del imperialismo moderno, la revolución rusa y el estalinismo, fascismo y nazismo, las dos guerras mundiales, el Holocausto judío, la descolonización de posguerra, el colapso de la Unión Soviética y la formación y crisis de la Unión Europea. OBJETIVOS: Desarrollar una aproximación teórica al proceso de desarrollo capitalista, analizando las transformaciones políticas ocurridas en Europa como resultado de dicho proceso. Investigar los orígenes del imperialismo moderno y sus transformaciones como resultado de los procesos de descolonización después de la segunda guerra mundial. Analizar el origen histórico de las principales corrientes políticas alternativas al capitalismo, como anarquismo, socialismo y comunismo. METODOLOGÍA Y FORMA DE EVALUACIÓN: Clases teóricas: Clases frontales con una exposición sintética de temas centrales mediante el análisis de casos representativos. La asistencia a las clases teóricas no es obligatoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Division World War II Vol One.Pdf
    THIRD INFANTRY DIVISION THE VICTORY PATH THROUGH FRANCE AND GERMANY VOLUME ONE 'IVG. WILLIAM MOHR THE VICTORY PATH THROUGH FRANCE AND GERMANY THIRD INFANTRY DIVISION - WORLD WAR II VOLUME ONE A PICTORIAL ACCOUNT BY G. WILLIAM MOHR ABOUT THE COVER There is nothing in front of the Infantry in battle except the enemy. The Infantry leads the way to attack and bears the brunt of the enemy's attack. The primary purpose of the Infan­ try is to close with the enemy in hand-to-hand fighting. On the side of a house, tommy gunners of this Infantry patrol, 1st Special Service Froce Patrol, one of the many patrols that made possible the present offensive in Italy by feeling out the enemy and discovering his defensive strength, fire from the window of an adjoining building to blast Nazis out. The scene is 400 yards from the enemy lines in the Anzio area, Italy. Fifth Army, 14 April, 1944. The 3rd Infantry Division suffered 27,450 casualties and 4,922 were killed in action. 2 - Yellow Beach, Southern France, August, 1944 3 - Marseilles, France, August, 1944 4 - Montelimar, France, August, 1944 5 - Cavailair, France, August, 1944 6 - Avignon, France, August, 1944 7 - Lacroix, France, August, 1944 8 - Brignolles, France, August, 1944 9 -Aix-En-Provence, France, August, 1944 12 - St. Loup, France, August, 1944 13 - La Coucounde, France, August, 1944 14 - Les Loges Neut, France, August, 1944 15 - Besancon, France, September, 1944 18 - Loue River, Ornans, France, September, 1944 19 - Avonne, France, Septem&er, 1944 20 - Lons Le Sounier, France, September, 1944 21 - Les Belles-Baroques, France, September, 1944 22 - St.
    [Show full text]
  • Morris Childs Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf896nb2v4 No online items Register of the Morris Childs papers Finding aid prepared by Lora Soroka and David Jacobs Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6010 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1999 Register of the Morris Childs 98069 1 papers Title: Morris Childs papers Date (inclusive): 1924-1995 Collection Number: 98069 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English and Russian Physical Description: 2 manuscript boxes, 35 microfilm reels(4.3 linear feet) Abstract: Correspondence, reports, notes, speeches and writings, and interview transcripts relating to Federal Bureau of Investigation surveillance of the Communist Party, and the relationship between the Communist Party of the United States and the Soviet communist party and government. Includes some papers of John Barron used as research material for his book Operation Solo: The FBI's Man in the Kremlin (Washington, D.C., 1996). Hard-copy material also available on microfilm (2 reels). Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Childs, Morris, 1902-1991. Contributor: Barron, John, 1930-2005. Location of Original Materials J. Edgar Hoover Foundation (in part). Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items, computer media, and digital files. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos, films, or digital files during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all material is immediately accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Yvon Delbos and Anthony Eden: Anglo-French Cooperation, 1936-38
    1 YVON DELBOS AND ANTHONY EDEN: ANGLO-FRENCH COOPERATION, 1936-38 Glyn Stone Anthony Eden was appointed foreign secretary at the end of 1935 following the dismissal of Sir Samuel Hoare for his part in the infamous Hoare-Laval Pact. Yvon Delbos, a member of the Radical party, became French foreign minister six months later as a result of the victory of the Popular Front in the May 1936 elections. Eden resigned as foreign secretary on 20 February 1938. Delbos followed suit less than four weeks later on 14 March 1938. When he became foreign secretary at the age of thirty eight, Eden was already the ambitious, rising star of the Conservative party and had accumulated an impressive degree of experience in foreign affairs having been parliamentary private secretary to foreign secretary Austen Chamberlain between 1926 and 1929, under secretary of state for foreign affairs from September 1931 until January 1934 when he became lord privy seal, and then in June 1935 minister of league of nations affairs (without portfolio). In comparison, Delbos was far less experienced, as Robert Young has observed: Yvon Delbos went to the Quai d’Orsay in his early fifties, equipped with a respectable if unspectacular reputation as a competent member of the Chamber and as a journalist with special interest in foreign affairs. A quiet, moderate man of modest political ambitions…Significantly, in a political world renowned for its gastronomic and alcoholic excesses, here was one, a curiosity, who did not suffer from liver complaints. But he was not the sort of man from whom one could expect either brilliance or novelty in foreign policy.1 Yet, the two foreign ministers developed a good working relationship and contributed much to the improvement in Anglo-French relations after the Abyssinian debacle and the mutual recrimination of the Rhineland crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Synarchy Movement of Empire Book Ii
    SYNARCHY MOVEMENT OF EMPIRE BOOK II THE MODERN SYNARCHY INTERNATIONAL by Pierre Beaudry LAVAL BEASTMAN OF VICHY LEESBURG, Va. June 20, 2005 1 DEDICATION This book is dedicated to the LaRouche Youth Movement (LYM) worldwide, and particularly to the French LYM, who deserve to know the truth about French history and world affairs. Previous generations of French citizens had settled their accounts with their immediate past history by either going to war, or by getting involved into absurd coups d'Etat, however, they never knew why they were doing so. My generation of Bohemian Bourgeois (BoBos) has not done that; it didn't care to do anything for history, nor for the future generations. It was only interested in lying and in taking care of "Me, Me, Me!" The problem that the youth of today are face with is that the truth about the French Revolution, about Napoleon Bonaparte, about the Synarchy, about the destruction of the Third Republic, or about Vichy has never been told. So, either the truth comes out now, and finally exorcises the French population as a whole, once and forever, or else the French nation is doomed to repeat the same mistakes of the past, again and again. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS BOOK II THE MODERN SYNARCHY INTERNATIONAL 1.1 SAINT YVES D'ALVEYDRE: THE SYNARCHY OF A ONE-WORLD EMPIRE …………… 8 ***** 1.2 INTRODUCTION 2.2 AGAINST THE PEACE OF WESTPHALIA AND AMERICA 3.2 A SYNARCHIST CONSTITUTION FOR EUROPE 4.2 SYNARCHIST ALLIANCE AGAINST ISLAM AND THE "TARTARS" 5.2 THE EXCLUSION OF ISLAM 6.2 SAINT-YVES D'ALVEYDRE, A VICTIM OF BIPOLARITY 7.2 THE HATRED OF PLATO AND OF {AGAPE} 8.2 THE CREATION OF THE {ORDRE MARTINISTE ET SYNARCHIQUE} 9.2 THE MYSTICAL ORIGINS OF THE SYNARCHY DOCTRINE 10.2 EISENHOWER INVITED TO HEAD THE AMERICAN SYNARCHY .
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the French in London Liberty, Equality, Opportunity
    A history of the French in London liberty, equality, opportunity Edited by Debra Kelly and Martyn Cornick A history of the French in London liberty, equality, opportunity A history of the French in London liberty, equality, opportunity Edited by Debra Kelly and Martyn Cornick LONDON INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Published by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU First published in print in 2013. This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY- NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978 1 909646 48 3 (PDF edition) ISBN 978 1 905165 86 5 (hardback edition) Contents List of contributors vii List of figures xv List of tables xxi List of maps xxiii Acknowledgements xxv Introduction The French in London: a study in time and space 1 Martyn Cornick 1. A special case? London’s French Protestants 13 Elizabeth Randall 2. Montagu House, Bloomsbury: a French household in London, 1673–1733 43 Paul Boucher and Tessa Murdoch 3. The novelty of the French émigrés in London in the 1790s 69 Kirsty Carpenter Note on French Catholics in London after 1789 91 4. Courts in exile: Bourbons, Bonapartes and Orléans in London, from George III to Edward VII 99 Philip Mansel 5. The French in London during the 1830s: multidimensional occupancy 129 Máire Cross 6. Introductory exposition: French republicans and communists in exile to 1848 155 Fabrice Bensimon 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid Prepared by David Kennaly Washington, D.C
    THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RARE BOOK AND SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DIVISION THE RADICAL PAMPHLET COLLECTION Finding aid prepared by David Kennaly Washington, D.C. - Library of Congress - 1995 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RARE BOOK ANtI SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DIVISIONS RADICAL PAMPHLET COLLECTIONS The Radical Pamphlet Collection was acquired by the Library of Congress through purchase and exchange between 1977—81. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 25 Number of items: Approx: 3465 Scope and Contents Note The Radical Pamphlet Collection spans the years 1870-1980 but is especially rich in the 1930-49 period. The collection includes pamphlets, newspapers, periodicals, broadsides, posters, cartoons, sheet music, and prints relating primarily to American communism, socialism, and anarchism. The largest part deals with the operations of the Communist Party, USA (CPUSA), its members, and various “front” organizations. Pamphlets chronicle the early development of the Party; the factional disputes of the 1920s between the Fosterites and the Lovestoneites; the Stalinization of the Party; the Popular Front; the united front against fascism; and the government investigation of the Communist Party in the post-World War Two period. Many of the pamphlets relate to the unsuccessful presidential campaigns of CP leaders Earl Browder and William Z. Foster. Earl Browder, party leader be—tween 1929—46, ran for President in 1936, 1940 and 1944; William Z. Foster, party leader between 1923—29, ran for President in 1928 and 1932. Pamphlets written by Browder and Foster in the l930s exemplify the Party’s desire to recruit the unemployed during the Great Depression by emphasizing social welfare programs and an isolationist foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason Timothy Scott Johnson The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1424 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE FRENCH REVOLUTION IN THE FRENCH-ALGERIAN WAR (1954-1962): HISTORICAL ANALOGY AND THE LIMITS OF FRENCH HISTORICAL REASON By Timothy Scott Johnson A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 TIMOTHY SCOTT JOHNSON All Rights Reserved ii The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason by Timothy Scott Johnson This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Richard Wolin, Distinguished Professor of History, The Graduate Center, CUNY _______________________ _______________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee _______________________
    [Show full text]