DOCSLIB.ORG

Oxford, 1984); H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Notes Notes to the Introduction I. K. O. Morgan, Labour in Power, 194~1951 (Oxford, 1984); H. Pelling, The Labour Governments, 194~51 (London, 1984); A. Cairncross, Years of Recovery: British Economic Policy, 194~51 (London, 1985); P. Hen­ nessy, Never Again: Britain, 194~1951 (London, 1992). 2. J. Saville, The Labour Movement in Britain (London, 1988); J. Fyrth (ed.), Labour's High Noon: The Government and the Economy, 194~51 (London, 1993). 3. C. Barnett, The Audit oj War: The Illusion and Reality of Britain as a Great Nation (London, 1986); The Lost Victory: British Dreams, British Realities, 194~1950 (London, 1995). 4. Symposium, 'Britain's Postwar Industrial Decline', Contemporary Record, 1: 2 (1987), pp. 11-19; N. Tiratsoo (ed.), The Altlee Years (London, 1991). 5. J. Tomlinson, 'Welfare and the Economy: The Economic Impact of the Welfare State, 1945-1951', Twentieth-Century British History, 6: 2 (1995), pp. 194--219. 6. Hennessy, Never Again, p. 453. See also M. Francis, 'Economics and Ethics: the Nature of Labour's Socialism, 1945-1951', Twentieth­ Century British History, 6: 2 (1995), pp. 220--43. 7. S. Fielding, P. Thompson and N. Tiratsoo, 'England Arise!' The Labour Party and Popular Politics in 1940s Britain (Manchester, 1995), pp. 209- 18. 8. P. Kellner, 'It Wasn't All Right,Jack', Sunday Times, 4 April 1993. See also The Guardian, 9 September 1993. 9. For a summary of the claims made by the political parties, see J. Barnes and A. Seldon, '1951-64: 13 W asted Years?', Contemporary Record, 1: 2 (1987). 10. V. Bogdanor and R. Skidelsky (eds), The Age oj Affluence, 1951-1964 (London, 1970); S. Brittan, Steering the Economy: The Role ojthe Treasury (Harmondsworth, 1971). 11. A. Seldon, Churchill's Indian Summer: The Conservative Government, 1951- 55 (London, 1981); R. Lamb, The Failure of the Eden Government (London, 1987); The Macmillan Years, 1957-1963: The Emerging Truth (London, 1995). There are in addition three chapters on individual parliaments in P. Hennessy and A. Seldon (eds), Ruling Performance: British Governments jrom Altlee to Thatcher (Oxford, 1987). See also 202 Notes J. Ramsden, The Age of Churchill and Eden, 194{)-57 (London, 1995); The Winds of Change: Macmillan to Heath, 1957-75 (London, 1996). 12. E.g. D. Carlton, Anthony Eden (London, 1981); R. Rhodes James, Anthony Eden (London, 1986); A. Horne, Macmillan, vol. I: 1894-1956 (London, 1988) and vol. II: 1957-1986 (London, 1989); J. Turner, Macmillan (London, 1994); P. Williams, Hugh Gaitskell (Oxford, 1982 edn); B. Pimlott, Harold Wilson (London, 1992). 13. E.g. R. Lowe, The Welfare State in Britain since 1945 (London, 1993); H. Glennerster, British Social Policy since 1945 (Oxford, 1995); N. Tim­ mins, The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State (London, 1995); N. F. R. Crafts, B. Duckham and N. Woodward (eds), The British Economy since 1945 (Oxford, 1991). 14. Bogdanor and Skidelsky (eds), Age of A.fjluence, p. 10. See also D. Kavanagh and P. Morris, Consensus Politics from Attlee to Thatcher (Oxford, 1989); D. Dutton, British Politics since 1945: The Rise and Fall of Consensus (Oxford, 1991). 15. K. O. Morgan, The People's Peace: British History, 1945--1989 (Oxford, 1990), p. 137. 16. Harriet Jones, 'New Tricks for an Old Dog? The Conservatives and Social Policy, 1951-55', in A. Gorst, L.Johnman and W. Scott Lucas (eds) , Contemporary British History, 1931-61: Politics and the Limits of Policy (London, 1991), pp. 33-43; N. Rollings, '''Poor Mr Butskell: A Short Life, Wrecked by Schizophrenia"?' , Twentieth-Century British History, 5: 2 (1994), pp. 183-205. 17. Owing to limitations of space other key issues in these years, for example immigration, are only touched upon briefly. 18. Guardian, 25 April 1995: comments by Elizabeth Young, reviewing Peter Vansittart's book In the Fifties (London, 1995). 19. Michael Shanks, The Stagnant Society: A Warning (Harmondsworth, 1961), pp. 173-4. Notes to Chapter 1: Setting Britain Free, 1951-5 1. D. E. Butler, The British General Election of 1955 (London, 1955), p. 15. 2. A. Seldon, 'The Churchill Administration, 1951-1955', in Hennessy and Seldon (eds), Ruling Performance, pp. 65-7. For a similar emphasis, see Kavanagh and Morris, Consensus Politics from Attlee to Thatcher, and Dutton, British Politics since 1945. 3. A. Seldon, 'Conservative Century', in A. Seldon and S. Ball (eds) , Conservative Century: The Conservative Party since 1900 (Oxford, 1994), p. 46. See also the fullest account of this period to date, Seldon's work Churchill's Indian Summer. 4. See D. E. Butler, The British General Election of 1951 (London, 1952). 5. M. Kandiah, 'Lord Woolton's Chairmanship of the Conservative Party 1946-1951', unpublished Exeter University PhD thesis (1992), pp. 214-26. Notes 203 6. B. Pimlott (ed.), The Political Diary of Hugh Dalton, 1918-40, 1945-60 (London, 1986): diary entry for 'End of October' 1951, p. 567. Herbert Morrison wrote a more sober assessment, saying that policy making was more difficult than in 1945 and that Labour now had to find a formula 'which will not only inspire convinced Socialists but which the electorate will, on the whole, find acceptable': Labour Party National Executive Committee (NEG) Minutes, 26 February 1952. 7. Butler, 1951 Election, pp. 239-42; Ramsden, Age of Churchill and Eden, p. 231. 8. Harold Macmillan, Tides of Fortune, 194!r55 (London, 1969): diary entry 28 October 1951, p. 362. 9. Ramsden, Age of Churchill and Eden, p. 239; Viscount Chandos, The Memoirs of Lord Chandos (London, 1962), p. 341. 10. Cited in Butler, 1951 Election, p. 244. 11. Macmillan, Tides of Fortune: diary entry for 21 September 1951, p.355. 12. Colonel J. R. Hutchinson MP to R. A. Butler, 21 November 1951: R. A. Butler Papers, Trinity College, Cambridge, B17, f. 153. 13. 'Our Conservative Crusade', notes drafted by Conservative Research Department (CRD), 27 December 1951: Conservative Central Office (CCO) Papers, Conservative Party Archive (CPA), Bodleian Library, Oxford, CCO 4/4/237. 14. Chandos Memoirs, p. 344. 15. Geoffrey Lloyd MP to Sydney Butler, 28 October 1951: Butler Papers, B17, f. 180. 16. N. Fisher, Harold Macmillan: A Biography (London, 1982), p. 136; Horne, Macmillan, vol. I, p. 333. 17. Macmillan, Tides of Fortune, p. 363; Lord Birkenhead, Walter Mon­ ckton: The Life of Viscount Monckton of Brenchley (London, 1969), p. 276. 18. Lord Birkenhead, The Prof in Two Worlds: The Official Life of Professor F. A. Lindemann, Viscount Cherwell (London, 1961), pp. 280-1. Church­ ill admitted his need for assistance in this area, confessing to one colleague: 'I was Chancellor of the Exchequer for five years but, you know, I never understood it!' (see John Boyd-Carpenter, Way of Life (London, 1980), p. 87). 19. Macmillan, Tides of Fortune: diary, 28 October 1951, p. 365. 20. The Economist, 3 November 1951. 21. R. Shepherd, lain Macleod (London, 1994), pp. 73-8. In the course of six minor reshuffles and one major reconstruction of the government that followed, places were however found for several younger minis­ ters. 22. G. N. Worswick and P. Ady (eds), The British Economy in the Nineteen­ Fifties (Oxford, 1962), pp. 15-16. 23. John Colville, The Fringes of Power: Downing Street Diaries, 1939-1955 (London, 1985), p. 635. 24. A. Cairncross (ed.), The Robert Hall Diaries, 1947-53 (London, 1989): diary entry for 29 October 1951, p. 176. 25. Macmillan, Tides of Fortune, pp. 366 and 384. 204 Notes 26. 'The Economic Position: Analysis and Remedies', memorandum by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, 31 October 1951: Public Record Office (PRO), Prime Minister's Papers (PREM), 11/132; 'The Eco­ nomic Situation', CRD memorandum, 7 November 1951: CPA, CRD 2/9/5. 27. R. Cockett (ed.), My Dear Max: The Letters of Brendan Bracken to Lord Beaverbrook, 192~1958 (London, 1990): letter dated 15 January 1952, p. 129. 28. Edwin Plowden, An Industrialist in the Treasury: The Post-War Years (London, 1989), p. 140. Plowden, head of the economic planning staff at the Treasury, did not identify the minister. 29. Cockett (ed.), My Dear Max: Bracken to Beaverbrook, 15 January 1952, p. 129. 30. The three main advocates were Leslie Rowan, George Bolton and Otto Clarke. 31. 'External Action', memorandum by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, 21 February 1952, PRO PREM 11/140. 32. Churchill to Eden, 21 February 1952, PRO PREM 11/138. 33. Donald MacDougall, 'Don and Mandarin': Memoirs of an Economist (London, 1987), p. 90. 34. Cherwell to Churchill, 26 February 1952, PRO PREM 11/140. 35. Arthur Salter, Slave of the Lamp: A Public Servant's Notebook (London, 1967), pp. 222-3. 36. MacDougall, 'Don and Mandarin', pp. 98-9, notes that Butler was backed by Lyttelton, Swinton and Crookshank; opponents included Churchill, Eden, Salisbury, Maxwell-Fyfe and Macmillan. 37. Cairncross (ed.), Hall Diaries: 4 March 1952, p. 206. 38. Birkenhead, The Prof, p. 285. 39. Cited in Lord Butler, The Art of the Possible (London, 1971), p. 160. Lyttelton added: 'They prefer a genteel bankruptcy, force majeure being the plea'. 40. Plowden, Industrialist in the Treasury, p. 156; Hall Diaries: 4 March 1952, p. 206. 41. Morgan, The People's Peace, pp. 120-2. 42. 'Setting the Pound Free', memorandum by Lord Cherwell, 18 March 1952, PRO PREM 11/137; Salter, Slave of the Lamp, p. 221. 43. A. Howard, RAB: The Life of R.A. Butler (London, 1987), pp. 187-8. 44. Butler, Art of the Possible, pp. 158-9. 45. Hall Diaries: 18 March 1952, p. 211. 46. The Economist, 12 April and 17 May 1952. 47. Minute to the Prime Minister from the Chief Whip, 23 November 1951, PRO PREM 11/136.
Recommended publications
  • Harold Macmillan's Resignation in 1963 Plunged the Conservative

    Harold Macmillan's Resignation in 1963 Plunged the Conservative

    FEATURE A conference rememberto he 83rd annual Conservative Harold Macmillan’s resignation in 1963 plunged Party Conference opened in Blackpool on Wednesday, 9th the Conservative conference into chaos, as rivals October 1963. Unionists from Scotland and Northern Ireland scrambled for supremacy and old alliances broke mingledT happily with Conservatives from England and Wales, their fellow party down. By the end of the week, one man was left members, in a gathering of some 3,000. A convivial informality prevailed: Cabinet standing. Lord Lexden looks back on a dramatic ministers who wanted to make confidential telephone calls had to use the scrambler few days of Tory party history phone placed in the television room at the main conference hotel. There were no pushy lobbyists, no public relations executives, no trade stands. 36 | THE HOUSE MAGAZINE | 11 OCTOBER 2013 WWW.POLITICSHOME.COM Alec Douglas-Home leaves Buckingham Palace after being invited to form a government folowing the resignation of Harold Macmillan They had not yet traditional stage arrive to be greeted as a conquering hero been invented. Hours of rumour and management of and bring the conference to a conclusion. Almost the only speculation were followed by the conference His mastery of platform oratory could be outsiders were the remarkable scenes of drama, proceedings relied on to send the party faithful back representatives was undertaken to their constituencies with words of of the media, when the hall fell silent to with particular inspiration ringing in their ears. who were always hear the Prime Minister’s care to prevent Rarely have carefully laid conference admitted in the resignation letter public expression plans been more spectacularly upset.
  • BDOHP Biographical Details and Index Lord Wright of Richmond

    BDOHP Biographical Details and Index Lord Wright of Richmond

    BDOHP Biographical details and index Lord Wright of Richmond (28.06.31-06.03.20) - career outline with, on right, relevant page numbers in the memoir to the career stage. Served Royal Artillery, 1950–51 p 3 Joined Diplomatic Service, 1955 pp 2-3 Middle East Centre for Arabic Studies, 1956–57 pp 3-6 Third Secretary, British Embassy, Beirut, 1958–60 - Private Secretary to Ambassador and later First Secretary, pp 12-15 British Embassy, Washington, 1960–65 Private Secretary to Permanent Under-Secretary, FO, 1965–67 pp 10-11 First Secretary and Head of Chancery, Cairo, 1967–70 - Deputy Political Resident, Bahrain, 1971–72 - Head of Middle East Department, FCO, 1972–74 - Private Secretary (Overseas Affairs) to Prime Minister, 1974–77 pp 7-10, 25, 34-35 Ambassador to Luxembourg, 1977–79 pp 30-31 Ambassador to Syria, 1979–81 pp 30-33 Deputy Under-Secretary of State, FCO, 1982–84 - Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, 1984–86 pp 33-34, 36 Permanent Under-Secretary of State and Head pp 11-12, of Diplomatic Service, 1986–91. 16-18, 21, 30 Member, Security Commission, 1993–2002. - General comments on Middle East and United States, pp 6-8; political versus professional diplomatic appointments, pp 15-20; retirement age in diplomatic service, pp 21-23; recruitment, pp 23-25; Foreign Office image, pp 38-40; John Major, pp 40-42; leaking of restricted papers, pp 43-45. Lord Wright of Richmond This is Malcolm McBain interviewing Lord Wright of Richmond at his home in East Sheen on Monday, 16 October 2000. MMcB: “Lord Wright, you were born in 1931, educated at Marlborough and Merton College, Oxford, you did a couple of years’ national service in the Royal Artillery, and then joined the Diplomatic Service, presumably after going to Oxford, in 1965.
  • Three Corners' Bluff: Pre-War Europe's Most Dangerous Game

    Three Corners' Bluff: Pre-War Europe's Most Dangerous Game

    Pre-war Europe’s Most Dangerous Game Emily Falconer Major: History The U.K. Advisor: Professor William Fowler Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain The year 1938 was a turning point for international relations in pre-war Europe. While the United Kingdom and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics were previously able to keep their aggressive German enemy Sir Neville Henderson at bay, 1938 marked a dramatic shift in foreign policy for all three nations. For Germany, under the command of Adolf Hitler, it marked the start of his hostile expansion into British or Soviet territory. For British Ambassador to Germany “allies” the UK and the USSR, respectively led by Sir Neville Chamberlain and Josef Stalin, it forced each of them to make cut-throat decisions in regards to their long-time alliance, and to come to agreeable terms with their common enemy, Adolf Hitler. In 1938, the world was unclear; anything could happen, and “[Henderson] Had almost become Hitler’s all was fair game. Only one outcome was imminent: Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich were ready for war. The only question was: Who would he fight first? ambassador to us, rather than our ambassador to Hitler.” On one hand, the UK and the USSR were steadfast allies, committed to defeating fascism in Europe at all costs, and in thorough agreement to defend one another should one find themselves attacked by Germany. On the other hand, both the UK and the USSR feared each other just as much, if not more, “The personal representative of the prime than they feared Hitler’s Germany.
  • London Calling: BBC External Services, Whitehall and the Cold War 1944- 57

    London Calling: BBC External Services, Whitehall and the Cold War 1944- 57

    London calling: BBC external services, Whitehall and the cold war 1944- 57. Webb, Alban The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/1577 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] LONDON CALLING: SSC EXTERNAL SERVICES, WHITEHALL AND THE COLD WAR, 1944-57 ALBAN WEBB Queen Mary College, University of London A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) 1 Declaration: The work presented in this thesis is my own. Signed: '~"\ ~~Ue6b Alban Webb Declaration: The work presented in this thesis is my own. Signed: Alban Webb ABSTRACT The Second World War had radically changed the focus of the BBC's overseas operation from providing an imperial service in English only, to that of a global broadcaster speaking to the world in over forty different languages. The end of that conflict saw the BBC's External Services, as they became known, re-engineered for a world at peace, but it was not long before splits in the international community caused the postwar geopolitical landscape to shift, plunging the world into a cold war. At the British government's insistence a re-calibration of the External Services' broadcasting remit was undertaken, particularly in its broadcasts to Central and Eastern Europe, to adapt its output to this new and emerging world order.
  • Inscribed 6 (2).Pdf

    Inscribed 6 (2).Pdf

    Inscribed6 CONTENTS 1 1. AVIATION 33 2. MILITARY 59 3. NAVAL 67 4. ROYALTY, POLITICIANS, AND OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES 180 5. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 195 6. HIGH LATITUDES, INCLUDING THE POLES 206 7. MOUNTAINEERING 211 8. SPACE EXPLORATION 214 9. GENERAL TRAVEL SECTION 1. AVIATION including books from the libraries of Douglas Bader and “Laddie” Lucas. 1. [AITKEN (Group Captain Sir Max)]. LARIOS (Captain José, Duke of Lerma). Combat over Spain. Memoirs of a Nationalist Fighter Pilot 1936–1939. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition. 8vo., cloth, pictorial dust jacket. London, Neville Spearman. nd (1966). £80 A presentation copy, inscribed on the half title page ‘To Group Captain Sir Max AitkenDFC. DSO. Let us pray that the high ideals we fought for, with such fervent enthusiasm and sacrifice, may never be allowed to perish or be forgotten. With my warmest regards. Pepito Lerma. May 1968’. From the dust jacket: ‘“Combat over Spain” is one of the few first-hand accounts of the Spanish Civil War, and is the only one published in England to be written from the Nationalist point of view’. Lerma was a bomber and fighter pilot for the duration of the war, flying 278 missions. Aitken, the son of Lord Beaverbrook, joined the RAFVR in 1935, and flew Blenheims and Hurricanes, shooting down 14 enemy aircraft. Dust jacket just creased at the head and tail of the spine. A formidable Vic formation – Bader, Deere, Malan. 2. [BADER (Group Captain Douglas)]. DEERE (Group Captain Alan C.) DOWDING Air Chief Marshal, Lord), foreword. Nine Lives. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition.
  • (C) Crown Copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/128/33 Image

    (C) Crown Copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/128/33 Image

    (c) crown copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/128/33 Image Reference:0037 SECRET THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S (GOVERNMENT Printed for the Cabinet. June 1959 C.C. (59) Copy No. 37th Conclusions ST CONCLUSIONS of a Meeting of the Cabinet held at 10 Downing Street, S.W. 1, on Tuesday, 23rd June, 1959, at 11 a.m. Present: The Right Hon. HAROLD MACMILLAN, M.P., Prime Minister. The Right Hon. R. A. BUTLER, M.P., The Right Hon. VISCOUNT KILMUIR, Secretary of State for the Home Lord Chancellor. Department and Lord Privy Seal. The Right Hon. SELWYN LLOYD, Q.C., The Right Hon. D . HEATHCOAT AMORY, M.P., Secretary of State for Foreign M.P., Chancellor of the Exchequer. Affairs. The Right Hon. THE EARL OF HOME, The Right Hon. ALAN LENNOX-BOYD, Secretary of State for Commonwealth M.P., Secretary of State for the Relations. Colonies. The Right Hon. JOHN MACLAY, M.P., The Right Hon. VISCOUNT HAILSHAM, Secretary of State for Scotland. Q.C., Lord President of the Council. The Right Hon. DUNCAN SANDYS, M.P., The Right Hon. Sir DAVID ECCLES, M.P., Minister of Defence. President of the Board of Trade. The Right Hon. IAIN MACLEOD, M.P., The Right Hon. HENRY BROOKE, M.P., Minister of Labour and National Minister of Housing and Local Service. Government and Minister for Welsh Affairs. The Right Hon. LORD MILLS, Minister The Right Hon. HAROLD WATKINSON, of Power. M.P., Minister of Transport and Civil Aviation. The Right Hon. GEOFFREY LLOYD, M.P., The Right Hon.
  • Discussing What Prime Ministers Are For

    Discussing What Prime Ministers Are For

    Discussing what Prime Ministers are for PETER HENNESSY New Labour has a lot to answer for on this front. They On 13 October 2014, Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield FBA, had seen what the press was doing to John Major from Attlee Professor of Contemporary British History at Queen Black Wednesday onwards – relentless attacks on him, Mary, University of London, delivered the first British which bothered him deeply.1 And they were determined Academy Lecture in Politics and Government, on ‘What that this wouldn’t happen to them. So they went into are Prime Ministers for?’ A video recording of the lecture the business of creating permanent rebuttal capabilities. and an article published in the Journal of the British Academy If somebody said something offensive about the can be found via www.britishacademy.ac.uk/events/2014/ Government on the Today programme, they would make every effort to put it right by the World at One. They went The following article contains edited extracts from the into this kind of mania of permanent rebuttal, which question and answer session that followed the lecture. means that you don’t have time to reflect before reacting to events. It’s arguable now that, if the Government doesn’t Do we expect Prime Ministers to do too much? react to events immediately, other people’s versions of breaking stories (circulating through social media etc.) I think it was 1977 when the Procedure Committee in will make the pace, and it won’t be able to get back on the House of Commons wanted the Prime Minister to be top of an issue.
  • Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup

    Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup

    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Fall 12-2013 Direct Responsibility: Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup Robert Howard Wieland University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the American Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wieland, Robert Howard, "Direct Responsibility: Caspar Weinberger and the Reagan Defense Buildup" (2013). Dissertations. 218. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/218 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY: CASPAR WEINBERGER AND THE REAGAN DEFENSE BUILDUP by Robert Howard Wieland Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School Of The University of Southern Mississippi In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2013 ABSTRACT DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY: CASPAR WEINBERGER AND THE REAGAN DEFENSE BUILDUP by Robert Howard Wieland December 2013 This dissertation explores the life of Caspar Weinberger and explains why President Reagan chose him for Secretary of Defense. Weinberger, not a defense technocrat, managed a massive defense buildup of 1.5 trillion dollars over a four year period. A biographical approach to Weinberger illuminates Reagan’s selection, for in many ways Weinberger harkens back to an earlier type of defense manager more akin to Elihu Root than Robert McNamara; more a man of letters than technocrat.
  • The Commercial & Technical Evolution of the Ferry

    The Commercial & Technical Evolution of the Ferry

    THE COMMERCIAL & TECHNICAL EVOLUTION OF THE FERRY INDUSTRY 1948-1987 By William (Bill) Moses M.B.E. A thesis presented to the University of Greenwich in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2010 DECLARATION “I certify that this work has not been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not concurrently being submitted for any degree other than that of Doctor of Philosophy being studied at the University of Greenwich. I also declare that this work is the result of my own investigations except where otherwise identified by references and that I have not plagiarised another’s work”. ……………………………………………. William Trevor Moses Date: ………………………………. ……………………………………………… Professor Sarah Palmer Date: ………………………………. ……………………………………………… Professor Alastair Couper Date:……………………………. ii Acknowledgements There are a number of individuals that I am indebted to for their support and encouragement, but before mentioning some by name I would like to acknowledge and indeed dedicate this thesis to my late Mother and Father. Coming from a seafaring tradition it was perhaps no wonder that I would follow but not without hardship on the part of my parents as they struggled to raise the necessary funds for my books and officer cadet uniform. Their confidence and encouragement has since allowed me to achieve a great deal and I am only saddened by the fact that they are not here to share this latest and arguably most prestigious attainment. It is also appropriate to mention the ferry industry, made up on an intrepid band of individuals that I have been proud and privileged to work alongside for as many decades as covered by this thesis.
  • Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript

    Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript

    Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript Date: Thursday, 24 May 2007 - 12:00AM PRIME MINISTERS IN THE POST-WAR WORLD: ALEC DOUGLAS-HOME D.R. Thorpe After Andrew Bonar Law's funeral in Westminster Abbey in November 1923, Herbert Asquith observed, 'It is fitting that we should have buried the Unknown Prime Minister by the side of the Unknown Soldier'. Asquith owed Bonar Law no posthumous favours, and intended no ironic compliment, but the remark was a serious under-estimate. In post-war politics Alec Douglas-Home is often seen as the Bonar Law of his times, bracketed with his fellow Scot as an interim figure in the history of Downing Street between longer serving Premiers; in Bonar Law's case, Lloyd George and Stanley Baldwin, in Home's, Harold Macmillan and Harold Wilson. Both Law and Home were certainly 'unexpected' Prime Ministers, but both were also 'under-estimated' and they made lasting beneficial changes to the political system, both on a national and a party level. The unexpectedness of their accessions to the top of the greasy pole, and the brevity of their Premierships (they were the two shortest of the 20th century, Bonar Law's one day short of seven months, Alec Douglas-Home's two days short of a year), are not an accurate indication of their respective significance, even if the precise details of their careers were not always accurately recalled, even by their admirers. The Westminster village is often another world to the general public. Stanley Baldwin was once accosted on a train from Chequers to London, at the height of his fame, by a former school friend.
  • Recall of Mps

    Recall of Mps

    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 June 2012 HC 373 [incorporating HC 1758-i-iv, Session 2010-12] Published on 28 June 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/pcrc. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume.
  • Britain and Europe

    Britain and Europe

    Britain and Europe ROBERT COOPER Forty years after Britain joined Europe both have changed, mostly for the better. This story does not, however, begin in 1972 when the negotiations finished and were ratified by parliament, nor in 1973 when the UK took its place at the Council table as a full member, but ten years before with the first British application and the veto by General de Gaulle. Sometimes, going further back still, it is suggested that if Ernest Bevin’s ideas for West European cooperation had been pursued,1 or if Britain had decided to join talks on the Schuman Plan,2 or to take the Spaak Committee seriously,3 things might have been different. But the truth is there was no Robert Schuman or Jean Monnet in Britain, and no readiness to think in radically new terms. Had the UK been present at the negotiations that led to the European Coal and Steel Community, the outcome for Britain would probably still have been the same, precisely because the vision was lacking. The decision on the Schuman Plan was a close-run thing—the idea of planning for heavy industry being in accordance with the ideas of the Labour government. But British ideas were very different from those of the French or the Americans, who were thinking in terms of supranational bodies—indeed, for Monnet this was a cardinal point. His approach was supported by the Benelux countries, which were already setting up their own customs union. Bevin had an ambition to lead Europe, but it is not clear where he wanted to take it.