DOCSLIB.ORG

James Barr, a Line in the Sand: the Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, – (New York and London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
James Barr, a Line in the Sand: the Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, – (New York and London Book Reviews / Bustan: The Middle East Book Review () – James Barr, A Line in the Sand: The Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, – (New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, ), pp. ISBN ---- ALineintheSand, which looks at the overt and covert Anglo-French struggle in the Middle East from the Sykes-Picot Agreement in to the war in Palestine, is worth reading because of its subject and the archival sources it utilizes. In the prologue to his book, James Barr, a journalist by profession, dramatically describes how in the summer of , his eyes “bulged” when he came across a report from early , written by an MI security officer. The officer, recently returned from the Middle East, alleged that the French authorities in the Levant were arming and financing “Jewish terrorists” fighting against British forces in Palestine. That information had been given to him by an MI officer who in turn claimed that it came from a “Top Secret” source. Barr concludes that “while the British were fighting and dying alongside the Americans to liberate France, their supposed allies the French were secretly backing Jewish efforts to kill British soldiers and officials in Palestine.” The history of the rivalry between France and Britain for dominance in the region is well known. Barr offers a long catalogue of imperial feuding, machinations, intrigues and back-stabbing by two ostensibly allied powers. He lays the blame evenly on France and Britain, but it would have been more accurate to study those relations as three decades of Britain’s persistent efforts to renege on the commitments it made to France in the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The terms “Fashoda” or “Perfidious Albion,” often used by French officials, might have been more appropriate to describe Britain’s subversive activities against France in the Middle East.1 In the summer of , Britain finally succeeded in evicting a defeated France from Syria and Lebanon, and for a short spell achieved its “moment” in the Middle East (to borrow Elizabeth Monroe’s term). Despite its declared policy of decolonization, Britain emerged from World War II as a hegemonic power in control of a “Covert Empire” designed to safeguard its vital strategic and economic interests in the region. But within a decade, this house of cards, diligently built by British diplomats, military officers and intelligence agents, came tumbling down: Britain, like France before her, was forced out, leaving the inhabitants of the region to clear up the mess its representatives had made for more than half a century. 1) In this regard, see: John Marlow, Perfidious Albion: The Origins of Anglo-French Rivalry in the Levant (London: Elek Books, ). © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, DOI: 10.1163/18785328-00032010 Book Reviews / Bustan: The Middle East Book Review () – The first half of the book is comprised of two parts. The first examines France and Britain’s division of the territories of the defeated Ottoman Empire in World War I, while the second covers the interwar years. Both periods have been well-documented, but Barr presents a comprehensive account of the com- plex rivalry between the two powers in the grand old tradition of th century European colonialism set against the background of the rise of the nationalist movements of Arab Nationalism and Zionism. He depicts the struggle between these powers through a series of episodes and lively descriptions of the indi- viduals involved. His extensive research in British and French archives and numerous private papers reveals hitherto unknown details of the clandestine Anglo-French war in the Middle East. For example, he gives details of the secret activities of Gilbert MacKereth, the British consul in Damascus before World War II, who succeeded in bribing and recruiting French officials and top Syr- ian leaders, including Prime Minister Jamil Mardam, as part of Britain’s efforts to end the flow of volunteers and arms to the Arab uprising in Palestine. The second half of the book is also made up of two parts: the first examines the secret Anglo-French war in Syria and Lebanon during World War II, while the second looks at the clandestine Franco-Zionist/Israeli collaboration against Britain, culminating in the war. Barr adds insightful details to the many accounts of the Anglo-French struggle in the Levant during World War II and the clash there between Winston Churchill and Charles de Gaulle. The recent discovery in French archives of secret British and Syrian documents obtained by the French Intelligence in Beirut sheds new light on the extent of Britain’s covert operations to oust France from the Levant and tacitly incorporate Syria and Lebanon into its sphere of influence. There is now evidence that the Lebanese constitutional crisis of November , which marked Lebanon’s independence from France, was staged by General Edward Spears, the British Minister to Syria and Lebanon, and Riad al-Sulh, the Lebanese Prime Minister, while the Syrian crisis of May , which effectively ended France’s control of Syria, was engineered by British agents in tacit collaboration with Jamil Mardam, the acting Prime Minister. Using recently declassified MI files, Barr presents new evidence of the extensive efforts by British intelligence agencies to uncover the Franco-Zion- ist/Israeli collaboration during –. Again, while major aspects of this collaboration are well known—particularly France’s assistance to the Zionist movement in furthering the illegal immigration of Jewish refugees from Europe after the war and supplying arms to the Hagana and Etzel, Jewish paramilitary organizations—Barr adds details about the British intelligence agencies’ deep concern regarding this collaboration..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421
    An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421 Hugues Canuel On se souvient aujourd’hui des forces de la France libre en raison de faits d’armes tels que leur courageuse résistance à Bir Hakeim en 1942 et la participation du général Leclerc à la libération de Paris en 1944. Par contre, la contribution antérieure de la marine de la France libre est moins bien connue : elle a donné à de Gaulle, dont l’espoir était alors bien mince, les moyens de mobiliser des appuis politiques au sein de l’empire colonial français et d’apporter une contribution militaire précoce à la cause des Alliés. Cette capacité s’est développée à la suite de l’appui modeste mais tout de même essentiel du Royaume-Uni, un allié qui se méfiait de fournir les ressources absolument nécessaires à une flotte qu’il ne contrôlait pas complètement mais dont les actions pourraient aider la Grande- Bretagne qui se trouvait alors presque seule contre les puissances de l’Axe. Friday 27 November 1942 marked the nadir of French sea power in the twentieth century. Forewarned that German troops arrayed around the Mediterranean base of Toulon were intent on seizing the fleet at dawn, Admiral Jean de Laborde – Commander of the Force de Haute Mer, the High Seas Force – and the local Maritime Prefect, Vice Admiral André Marquis, ordered the immediate scuttling of all ships and submarines at their berths. Some 248,800 tons of capital ships, escorts, auxiliaries and submarines was scuttled as the Wehrmacht closed in on the dockyard.2 The French “Vichy navy” virtually ceased to exist that day.
    [Show full text]
  • Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British-Free French Relations 1940-1941" (2019)
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2019 Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British- Free French Relations 1940-1941 Samantha Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Sullivan, Samantha, "Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British-Free French Relations 1940-1941" (2019). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 324. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/324 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British-Free French Relations 1940-1941 By: Samantha Sullivan Advised by: Drs. Steven Zdatny, Andrew Buchanan, and Meaghan Emery University of Vermont History Department Honors College Thesis April 17, 2019 Acknowledgements: Nearly half of my time at UVM was spent working on this project. Beginning as a seminar paper for Professor Zdatny’s class in Fall 2018, my research on Churchill and De Gaulle slowly grew into the thesis that follows. It was a collaborative effort that allowed me to combine all of my fields of study from my entire university experience. This project took me to London and Cambridge to conduct archival research and made for many late nights on the second floor of the Howe Library. I feel an overwhelming sense of pride and accomplishment for this thesis that is reflective of the work I have done at UVM.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Against the French: Australians in the Allied Invasion of Lebanon and Syria, 1941
    Fighting against the French: Australians in the Allied invasion of Lebanon and Syria, 1941 Daniel Seaton Introduction In the nearly three quarters of a century since the end of the Second World War, popular memory of Australia’s involvement in the conflict has been shaped around several key cornerstones of engagement. Tobruk, Kokoda, and Singapore, for example, are easily understandable stories of heroism and sacrifice, which have been etched into Australian national consciousness as symbols of the nation’s contribution to the war. These symbols provide unambiguous displays of the courage and determination shown by Australian service personnel, fought against easily recognisable enemies: the Germans and Japanese. Where areas of conflict did not fit into these clear-cut criteria, they often became subsumed by the popular narrative of the war. An example of this is the Lebanon-Syria campaign of June–July 1941, fought against pro-Axis Vichy French forces, which has remained a far less well-known and understood area of Australian engagement to this day.1 Though the campaign was a relatively minor event in the grand scheme of the war, it held great significance for the men, mostly of the recently-formed 7th Australian Division, who fought there. In his 1989 memoir, Corporal Anthony MacInante, a veteran of the campaign, wrote that “very little credit, if any, has been given to the Commanding Officers and troops who secured this vital northern flank of Lebanon- Syria … In Australia we hardly get a mention”.2 MacInante’s complaints may have been
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Mary Borden Collection
    The Inventory of the Mary Borden Collection #26 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center MARY BORDEN MANUSCRIPTS Four O'Clock and Other Stories (1926) Box 1 -3.: pa.e1ffig04 manuscript and typescript drafts as follows: Four O'Clock - ms. draft, 37p.• ; typescript, 16-t'. Meeting in Mayfair - ms. draft, . 33 .{ o; typescript, 17,e • and carbon, 18 .e. Tapestry Needlework - ms. draft, 27Q .; typescript carbon, 14-e. and orig lackin~ -I. 14 . Beauty - no ms. draft; typescript carbon, 17-l!. with holograph annotations. The Little Horse - ms. draft, 32 .e. No Verdiot - ms • draft, 111-I. • Miss Bateman - Ms. draft, 35-l.(with-l. 1 typed); typescript carbon, 17,e. with holograph annotations. Accident Qn the Quai Voltaire - ms. draft, 43' o; typescript carbon, 18-2. with holograph annotations. Siegfried and the Step Daughter - ms. draft, 60/.; typescript carbon, 26 -R. with holograph annotations. To~ Jesus Christ - ms. draft, 36 I'. And a typescript of 250-i • in p:i.per binder, later draft with holograph annotations. Forbidden Zone (1929) Box 1 J.. pae~eage'S :Uox 2 One package has ms. ahd typescript with holograph-t. inserted. Box 1 One package·ma.rked "typescript and manuscript 2nd arrangement11 has: contents page listing 5 pts. that typescript is incomplete. Missing are prologue and other sections. The holograph manuscript is earlier draft than the typescript • .Also a French translation by M.B. 11 La Zone Interdite11 , typescript with holograph corrections. Some ms. p:i.ges stamped by War Ministry 11 oensored11 • MARY BORDEN MANUSCRIPTS Sarah Gay (1931) Box 3 l paeka~e- Marked1 "Two typescripts".
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Rhetoric in Anglo-French Imperial Relations, 1940-1945
    1 Between Policy Making and the Public Sphere: The Role of Rhetoric in Anglo-French Imperial Relations, 1940-1945 Submitted by Rachel Renee Chin to the University of Exeter As a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History In September 2016 This thesis is available for library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. Signature: 2 Abstract The long history of Anglo-French relations has often been acrimonious. After the German defeat of France in June 1940 the right to represent the French nation was contested by Philippe Pétain’s Vichy government and Charles de Gualle’s London-based Free French resistance movement. This thesis will examine the highly complex relationship between Britain and these two competing sources of Frenchness between 1940 and 1945. It will do so through a series of empire-themed “crisis points,” which contributed to a heightened state of Anglo-French tension affecting all three actors. This study uses rhetoric as a means to link decision makers or statesman to the public sphere. It argues that policy makers, whether in the British War Cabinet, de Gaulle’s headquarters at Carlton Gardens, or Pétain’s ministries at Vichy anticipated how their policies were likely to be received by a group or groups of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Home Front and War in the Twentieth Century
    THE HOME FRONT AND WAR IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Proceedings of the Tenth Military History Symposium October 20-22. 1982 Edited by James Titus United States Air Force Acdemy and Office of Air Force History Headquarters USAF 1984 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Military History Symposium (U.S.) (10th : 1982) (United States Air Force Academy) The home front and war in the twentieth century Sponsored by: The Department of History and The Association of Graduates. Includes index. 1. Military history, Modem-20th century-Congresses. 2. War and society-History-20th century4ongresses. 3. War--Economic aspects-Congresses. 4. War-Economic aspects-United States4ongresses. 5. United States-Social conditions-Congresses. I. Titus, James. 11. United States Air Force Academy. Dept. of History. 111. United States Air Force Academy. Assocation of Graduates. IV. Title. D431.M54 1982 303.6'6 83-600203 ISBN 0-912799-01-3 For sale by Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 20402 11 THE TENTH MILITARY HISTORY SYMPOSIUM October 20-22, 1982 United States Air Force Academy Sponsored by The Department of History and The Association of Graduates ******* Executive Director, Tenth Military History Symposium: Lieutenant Colonel James Titus Deputy Director, Tenth Military History Symposium: Major Sidney F. Baker, USA Professor and Head, Department of History: Colonel Carl W. Reddel President, Association of Graduates: Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J. Eller, USAF. Retired Symposium Committee Members: Captain John G. Albert Captain Mark L. Dues Captain Bernard E. Harvey Captain Vernon K. Lane Captain Robert C. Owen Captain Michael W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2499 Prelims 7/4/03 2:40 Pm Page I
    Atkin 2 colours 30/4/03 4:54 pm Page 1 It is widely assumed that the French in the Cover illustration: A French soldier and two of his British Isles during the Second World War comrades, coming from Dunkirk, receive a snack THE were fully-fledged supporters of General after landing in Great Britain, 1940. Courtesy of Photos12.com – Oasis de Gaulle, and that across the channel at FORGOTTEN least, the French were a ‘nation of THE ATKIN resisters’. This highly provocative study reveals that most exiles were on British FORGOTTEN FRENCH soil by chance rather than by design, and Exiles in the British Isles, 1940-44 many were not sure whether to stay. FRENCH Overlooked by historians, who have Exiles in the British Isles, 1940-44 concentrated on the ‘Free French’ of de Gaulle, these were the ‘Forgotten French’: The forgotten French refugees swept off the beaches of Dunkirk; servicemen held in camps after the Franco-German armistice; Vichy consular officials left to cater for their compatriots; and a sizeable colonist community based mainly in London. This is a really interesting and important work, which will Drawing on little-known archival sources, this study examines the hopes and fears of be of interest to scholars of twentieth-century Britain and these communities who were bitterly France because it throws light on so many other issues. divided among themselves, some being attracted to Pétain as much as to de Dr Richard Vinen, King’s College, London Gaulle. It also looks at how they fitted into British life and how the British in turn responded.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Anthony Eden and the Suez Crisis of 1956 the Anatomy of a Flawed Personality
    Sir Anthony Eden and the Suez Crisis of 1956 The Anatomy of a Flawed Personality by Eamon Hamilton A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Master of Arts by Research Centre for Byzantine Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Department of Classics Ancient History and Archeology College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham June 2015 1 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Acknowledgements I am very grateful to the staff at the following institutions: The Bodleian Library, University of Oxford Churchill College Library, University of Cambridge Cadbury Research Library, University of Birmingham Manx National Heritage, Douglas, Isle of Man The National Archives, Kew 2 When Anthony Eden became British Prime Minister on 6 April 1955 it seemed the culmination of a brilliant career in politics. Less than two years later that career was over, effectively destroyed by his behaviour over the nationalisation of the Suez Canal Company by the Egyptian President, Gamal Nasser.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Armageddon Ethesis.Pdf
    Managing Armageddon The science of transportation and the British Expeditionary Force, 1900-1918 Christopher Phillips Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History January 2015 i The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2015 The University of Leeds and Christopher Phillips The right of Christopher Phillips to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. ii Acknowledgements This thesis has benefitted from the support, advice and guidance of many people, in many ways, and at many times. My supervisors at the University of Leeds, Professor Holger Afflerbach and Professor Alison Fell, have provided their knowledge and expertise throughout the duration of this project. Their input has greatly improved the final thesis from the initial proposal. I thank them both, as well as Dr Jessica Meyer, Dr Dominic Berry, Philippa Read and all those who have contributed to the Legacies of War project and associated seminar series. The Faculty of Arts at the University of Leeds provided financial assistance through the grant of a PhD Studentship in First World War Studies. The genesis of this project took place at the University of Birmingham, encouraged by Professor John Bourne, Professor Pete Simkins and in particular Rob Thompson.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    British Journal for Military History Volume 6, Issue 3, November 2020 Who Speaks for France? Vichy, Free France and the Battle over French Legitimacy: 1940-1942 Rachel Chin ISSN: 2057-0422 Date of Publication: 25 November 2020 Citation: Rachel Chin, ‘Who Speaks for France? Vichy, Free France and the Battle over French Legitimacy: 1940-1942’, British Journal for Military History, 6.3 (2020), pp. 2-22. www.bjmh.org.uk This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The BJMH is produced with the support of British Journal for Military History, Volume 6, Issue 3, November 2020 Who Speaks for France? Vichy, Free France and the Battle over French Legitimacy: 1940-1942 RACHEL CHIN* University of Glasgow, UK Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In June 1940 the French metropolitan government signed an armistice with Hitler’s Germany, which effectively removed France from the conflict. At the same time, the little known French General Charles de Gaulle was in London establishing himself at the head of the Free French resistance movement. This set the stage for arguments over who represented the French nation and its interests. This article explores how the Vichy government and the Free French movement constructed their respective claims to legitimacy using legal, moral and historical arguments. And it considers how these claims were fought through armed clashes over French colonial territory. Introduction On 17 June 1940 the French General Charles de Gaulle and the British Liaison Officer to the French, Edward Spears, boarded a plane bound for England.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD WAR ONE WAR WORLD Research Guide World War One
    WORLD WAR ONE WAR WORLD Research Guide World War One 1 King’s College London Archives & Special Collections Archives College London King’s Sections of this guide 1. Prelude to war 5 2. High Command & strategy 7 3. Propaganda 9 4. Military & naval campaigns 11 5. Technology of war 18 6. Empire & dominions 22 7. Health & welfare 24 8. Aftermath 27 9. Memorials 30 10. Writing the war 32 Library Services 2014 DESIGN & PRODUCTION Susen Vural Design www.susenvural.com 2 March 2014 Introduction Archives Online resources The Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives www.kcl.ac.uk/archivespec/collections/resources (LCHMA) holds nearly 200 collections These include: relating to World War One. They include The Serving Soldier portal, giving access to orders, reports, diaries, letters, telegrams, log thousands of digital copies of unique diaries, books, memoranda, photographs, memoirs, correspondence, scrapbooks, photographs and maps, posters, press cuttings and memorabilia. other LHCMA archive items, from the late For more information, please see the online 19th century to World War Two, scanned as LHCMA World War One A-Z listing under part of a JISC-funded project. research guides at www.kcl.ac.uk/archivespec King’s College London Archives are Lest We Forget, a website created by King’s among the most extensive and varied higher College London Archives and the University education collections in the UK. They include of the Third Age (U3A), to commemorate the institutional records of King’s since 1828, the 20th century war dead of King’s College records relating to King’s College Hospital and London and the institutions with which it the medical schools of Guy’s and St Thomas’ has merged, including the Medical Schools of Hospitals, and records relating to other Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Gb165-0269 Spears
    GB165-0269 SPEARS Reference code: GB165-0269 Title: Sir Edward Spears Collection Name of creator: Spears, Sir Edward Louis (1886-1974) Knight, Major General, Politician and Author Dates of creation of material: 1941-1970 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 28 boxes Biographical history: Spears, Maj.-Gen. Sir Edward Louis, 1st Baronet (1886-1974) Born 7 August 1886, son of Charles Spears and Marguerite Spears (née Hack). Educated privately. Joined Kildare Militia in 1903 and gazetted 8th Hussars in 1906; transferred 11th Hussars, 1910; temporary Captain 1914; Brevet Major; Brevet Lt-Col; Hon. Brig.- Gen.; Head of British Military Mission, Paris, 1917-1920; CBE 1919; retired in 1920; CB 1921; MP Loughborough Div. of Leicester as National Liberal during 1922-1924; MP (Unionist) Carlisle, 1931-1945: Major-General 1940; Prime Minister’s Personal Representative with French Prime Minister and Minister of Defence, May-June 1940; Head of British Mission to General de Gaulle, June 1940; Head of Spears Mission, Syria and the Lebanon, July 1941; KBE 1942; First Minister to Republics of Syria and the Lebanon, 1942-1944; Hon. Major-General, 1945; Chairman of Council, Institute of Directors until 1965; President, Ashanti Goldfields Ltd.; Life Pres., West End Bd, Commercial Union Assurance Co. Ltd., 1972. Married 1st, 1918, Mary Borden (d.1968): 1 son deceased; 2nd, 1969, Nancy Maurice (d.1975). Died on 27 January 1974. Biographical History from the 1975 catalogue General and Lady Spears were married in 1918 when General Spears was head of the British Mission to the French War Office and Lady Spears was Directrice of a mobile hospital which she had equipped and given to the French Army.
    [Show full text]