DOCSLIB.ORG

Partial Bibliography on Theism and Physical Cosmology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Partial Bibliography on Theism and Physical Cosmology Partial bibliography on theism and physical cosmology Hans Halvorson September , òýÔÔ References [Ô] A. Ashtekar. Loop quantum cosmology: an overview. General Relativity and Gravitation, ¥Ô(¥):ÞýÞ–Þ¥Ô, òýýÀ. [ò] EW Barnes. Discussion on the evolution of the universe. Nature, Ôò(çòç¥):ÞÔÀ–Þòò, ÔÀçÔ. [ç] S.M. Barr. Modern physics and ancient faith. University of Notre Dame Press, òýýç. [¥] M. Bojowald. Quantum gravity and the big bang. Arxiv preprint astro-ph/ýçýÀ¥Þ, òýýç. [ ] M. Bojowald. e early universe in loop quantum cosmology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume ò¥, page ÞÞ. IOP Publishing, òýý . [â] M. Bojowald. Universe scenarios from loop quantum cosmology. Annalen der Physik, Ô (¥- ):çòâ–ç¥Ô, òýýâ. [Þ] M. Bojowald. Singularities and quantum gravity. Arxiv preprint gr-qc/ýÞýòÔ¥¥, òýýÞ. [] M. Bojowald. Follow the bouncing universe. Scientic American, òÀÀ(¥):¥¥– Ô, òýý. [À] M. Bojowald. Harmonic cosmology: how much can we know about a universe before the big bang? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-A, ¥â¥(òýÀâ):òÔç –òÔ ý, òýý. [Ôý] M. Bojowald. Quantum nature of cosmological bounces. General Relativity and Gravitation, ¥ý(Ôò):òâ À–òâç, òýý. [ÔÔ] M. Bojowald and H. Morales-Técotl. Cosmological applications of loop quantum gravity. e Early Universe and Observational Cosmology, pages ¥òÔ–¥âò, òýý¥. [Ôò] Martin Bojowald. Zurück vor den Urknall. Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, òýýÀ. English transla- tion: Once before time: a whole story of the universe. [Ôç] David Burrell et al., editors. Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge University Press, New York, òýÔý. [Ô¥] J. Byl. e role of belief in modern cosmology. http://www.twu.cc/byl/belief.n.doc. [Ô ] J. Byl. God and cosmos. Banner of Truth Trust, Carlisle, PA, òýýÔ. Ô [Ôâ] Lawrence Cahoone. Arguments from nothing: God and quantum cosmology. Zygon, ¥¥(¥):ÞÞÞ–ÞÀâ, òýýÀ. [ÔÞ] Bernard Carr, editor. Universe or multiverse. Cambridge Univ Pr, òýýÞ. [Ô] S. Carroll. Why (almost all) cosmologists are atheists. Faith and Philosophy, òò( ):âòò, òýý . [ÔÀ] Sean Carroll. Does the universe need God? In James Stump and Alan Padgett, editors, e Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. Wiley-Blackwell, òýÔò. [òý] W. Carroll. omas Aquinas and big bang cosmology. Sapientia, À : ç–Þç, ÔÀÀ. [òÔ] W.E. Carroll. Big bang cosmology, quantum tunneling from nothing, and creation. Laval théologique et philosophique, ¥¥(ÔÀ): À–Þ , ÔÀ. [òò] G. Cleaver. Before the big bang: string theory, God, and the origin of the universe, òýýâ. Metanexus. [òç] I.B. Cohen. Isaac Newton’s papers and letters on natural philosophy and related documents. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, ÔÀÞ. [ò¥] Peter Coles. Cosmology: a very short introduction. Oxford Univ Pr, òýýÔ. [ò ] R. Collins. e argument from design and the many-worlds hypothesis. In W.L. Craig, editor, Philos- ophy of Religion: a Reader and Guide, pages Ôçý–Ô¥. Rutgers University Press, òýýò. [òâ] P. Copan and W.L. Craig. Creation out of nothing: a biblical, philosophical, and scientic exploration. Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, MI, òýý¥. [òÞ] W.Craig. eism and physical cosmology. In Philip Quinn and Charles Taliaferro, editors, A compan- ion to philosophy of religion, page ¥ÔÀ. Wiley-Blackwell, ÔÀÀÀ. [ò] W.L. Craig. ‘What place, then, for a creator?’: Hawking on God and creation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, ¥Ô(¥):¥Þç–¥ÀÔ, ÔÀÀý. [òÀ] W.L. Craig. God and the initial cosmological singularity: a reply to Quentin Smith. Faith and Philoso- phy, À:òç–¥, ÔÀÀò. [çý] W.L. Craig. e Origin and Creation of the Universe: a reply to Adolf Grünbaum. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, ¥ç(ò):òçç–ò¥ý, ÔÀÀò. [çÔ] W.L. Craig. Prof. Grünbaum on creation. Erkenntnis, ¥ý(ç):çò –ç¥Ô, ÔÀÀ¥. [çò] W.L. Craig. Hartle-Hawking cosmology and atheism. Analysis, Þ(¥):òÀÔ–òÀ , ÔÀÀÞ. [çç] W.L. Craig. e ultimate question of origins: God and the beginning of the universe. Astrophysics and Space Science, òâÀ:ÞòÔ–Þç, ÔÀÀÀ. [ç¥] W.L.Craig. Naturalism and cosmology. In W.L.Craig and J.P. Moreland, editors, Naturalism: a critical analysis, pages òÔ –ò ò. Routledge, NY, òýýý. [ç ] W.L. Craig. J. Howard Sobel on the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, çâ(¥): â – ¥, òýýÞ. ò [çâ] W.L. Craig and Q. Smith. eism, atheism, and big bang cosmology. Oxford University Press, NY, ÔÀÀ . [çÞ] R.J. Deltete. Hawking on God and creation. Zygon, ò(¥):¥ – ýâ, ÔÀÀç. [ç] R.J. Deltete and R.A. Guy. Hartle-Hawking cosmology and unconditional probabilities. Analysis, Þ(¥):çý¥, ÔÀÀÞ. [çÀ] W.B. Drees. Beyond the big bang: quantum cosmologies and God. Open Court, Chicago, IL, ÔÀÀý. [¥ý] J. Earman. Bangs, crunches, whimpers, and shrieks: singularities and acausalities in relativistic space- times. Oxford University Press, NY, ÔÀÀ . [¥Ô] A.S. Eddington. New pathways in science. Macmillan, NY, ÔÀç . [¥ò] G.F.R. Ellis. e theology of the anthropic principle. In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy, and C. J. Isham, editors, Quantum cosmology and the laws of nature: scientic perspectives on divine action, pages çâÞ– ¥ý . Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State, ÔÀÀç. [¥ç] G.F.R. Ellis. Issues in the philosophy of cosmology. In J. Buttereld and J. Earman, editors, Philosophy of Physics, pages ÔÔç–Ôò . North Holland, òýýâ. [¥¥] G.F.R. Ellis. Multiverses and ultimate causation. In Fraser Watts, editor, Creation: Law and Probability, page À. Ashgate Publishing, òýý. [¥ ] John Farrell. e day without yesterday: Lemaître, Einstein, and the birth of modern cosmology. un- der’s Mouth Press, òýý . [¥â] H. Friedrich and J. Frauendiener. e conformal structure of spacetime: geometry, analysis, numerics. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, NY, òýýò. [¥Þ] G. Gasperini et al. Pre-big-bang in string cosmology. Astroparticle Physics, Ô(ç):çÔÞ–ççÀ, ÔÀÀç. [¥] M. Gasperini. e universe before the big bang: cosmology and string theory. Springer, NY, òýý. [¥À] M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano. e pre-big bang scenario in string cosmology. Physics Reports, çÞç(Ô-ò):Ô–òÔò, òýýç. [ ý] O. Godart and M. Heller. Un travail inconnu de Georges Lemaître. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, çÔ:ç¥ –ç À, ÔÀÞ. [ Ô] A. Grünbaum. e pseudo-problem of creation in physical cosmology. Philosophy of Science, â(ç):çÞç–çÀ¥, ÔÀÀ. [ ò] A. Grünbaum. Creation as a Pseudo-explanation in current physical cosmology. Erkenntnis, ç (Ô):òçç– ò ¥, ÔÀÀÔ. [ ç] A. Grünbaum. Some comments on William Craig’s ‘creation and big bang cosmology’. Philosophia naturalis, çÔ:òò –çâ, ÔÀÀ¥. [ ¥] A. Grünbaum. eological misinterpretations of current physical cosmology. Foundations of Physics, òâ: òç– ¥ç, ÔÀÀâ. ç [ ] A. Grünbaum. A new critique of theological interpretations of physical cosmology. e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Ô(Ô):Ô, òýýý. [ â] A. Grünbaum. e poverty of theistic cosmology. e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, (¥): âÔ, òýý¥. [ Þ] V.G. Gurzadyan and R. Penrose. Concentric circles in WMAP data may provide evidence of violent pre-big-bang activity. http://arxiv.org/abs/ÔýÔÔ.çÞýâ, òýÔý. [ ] Deborah Haarsma. Christian and atheist responses to Big Bang cosmology. In M. Stewart, editor, Science and religion in dialogue, pages ÔçÔ–Ô¥À. Wiley-Blackwell, òýý. [ À] I. Hacking. e inverse gambler’s fallacy: the argument from design. e anthropic principle applied to wheeler universes. Mind, Àâ(çç):ççÔ, ÔÀÞ. [âý] M. Heller. Cosmological singularity and the creation of the universe. Zygon, ç (ç):ââ –â , òýýý. [âÔ] M. Heller. Ultimate explanations of the universe. Springer, NY, òýýÀ. [âò] Michael Heller. Creative Tension: Essays on Science and Religion. Templeton Foundation Press, Radnor, PA, òýýç. [âç] N.S. Hetherington. Cosmology: historical, literary, philosophical, religious, and scientic perspectives. Garland, NY, ÔÀÀç. [â¥] R.D. Holder. Fine-tuning, multiple universes and theism. Nous, çâ(ò):òÀ –çÔò, òýýò. [â ] R.D. Holder. God, the multiverse, and everything: modern cosmology and the argument from design. Ashgate, òýý¥. [ââ] F. Hoyle. Home is where the wind blows: chapters from a cosmologist’s life. University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, ÔÀÀ¥. [âÞ] C.J. Isham. Quantum theories of the creation of the universe. In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy, and C. J. Isham, editors, Quantum cosmology and the laws of nature: scientic perspectives on divine action, pages ¥À–À. Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State, ÔÀÀç. [â] C. Juhl. Fine-tuning is not surprising. Analysis, ââ(¥):òâÀ, òýýâ. [âÀ] B. Kanitscheider. Philosophisch-historische Grundlagen der physikalischen Kosmologie. Kohlhammer, ÔÀÞ¥. [Þý] B. Kanitscheider. Does physical cosmology transcend the limits of naturalistic reasoning? In Paul Weingartner and Georg Dorn, editors, Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise, pages ççÞ–ç ý. Rodopi, ÔÀÀý. [ÞÔ] B. Kanitscheider. Kosmologie: Geschichte und Systematik in philosophischer Perspektive. Reclam, ÔÀÀÔ. [Þò] Douglas Kelly. Creation and change: Genesis Ô.Ô–ò.¥ in the light of changing scientic paradigms. Mentor (Christian Focus Publications), Ross-shire, Scotland, òýýý. [Þç] J. Khoury, B.A. Ovrut, P.J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok. Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang. Physical Review D, â¥(Ôò):Ôòç òò, òýýÔ. ¥ [Þ¥] C. Kiefer. Quantum Gravity – A Short Overview. Quantum Gravity, pages Ô–Ôç, òýýÞ. [Þ ] Claus Kiefer. Der Quanten-kosmos. Fischer, òýý. [Þâ] J. Koperski. Should we care about ne-tuning? e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, â(ò):çýç, òýý . [ÞÞ] K.J. Kraay. eism, possible worlds, and the multiverse. Philosophical studies, Ô¥Þ(ç):ç –çâ, òýÔý. [Þ] H. Kragh. Cosmology and controversy: the historical development of two theories of the universe. Prince- ton University Press, ÔÀÀÀ. [ÞÀ] H. Kragh. Matter and spirit in the universe: scientic and religious preludes to modern cosmology. Im- perial College Press, London, òýý¥. [ý] H. Kragh. Contemporary history of cosmology and the controversy over the multiverse. Annals of Science, ââ(¥): òÀ– ç, òýýÀ. [Ô] H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Cosmology," Organized by a Committee Chaired by David N
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, p. 4765, June 1993 Colloquium Paper This paper serves as an introduction to the following papers, which were presented at a colloquium entitled "Physical Cosmology," organized by a committee chaired by David N. Schramm, held March 27 and 28, 1992, at the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Physical cosmology DAVID N. SCHRAMM Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 The Colloquium on Physical Cosmology was attended by 180 much notoriety. The recent report by COBE of a small cosmologists and science writers representing a wide range of primordial anisotropy has certainly brought wide recognition scientific disciplines. The purpose of the colloquium was to to the nature of the problems. The interrelationship of address the timely questions that have been raised in recent structure formation scenarios with the established parts of years on the interdisciplinary topic of physical cosmology by the cosmological framework, as well as the plethora of new bringing together experts of the various scientific subfields observations and experiments, has made it timely for a that deal with cosmology. high-level international scientific colloquium on the subject. Cosmology has entered a "golden age" in which there is a The papers presented in this issue give a wonderful mul- tifaceted view of the current state of modem physical cos- close interplay between theory and observation-experimen- mology. Although the actual COBE anisotropy announce- tation. Pioneering early contributions by Hubble are not ment was made after the meeting reported here, the following negated but are amplified by this current, unprecedented high papers were updated to include the new COBE data.
    [Show full text]
  • 01. Pre-Socratic Cosmology and Plato I. Basic Issues (1) Metaphysical (A) What Do Things Consist Of? • One Substance (Monism) Socrates ("SOH-Kra-Teez") Died: 399 B.C
    01. Pre-Socratic Cosmology and Plato I. Basic Issues (1) Metaphysical (a) What do things consist of? • one substance (monism) Socrates ("SOH-kra-teez") Died: 399 B.C. • many substances (pluralism) Problem of the One and the Many - How is diversity derived from unity? - How is unity derived from diversity? (b) What is the nature of change? (2) Epistemological (a) What is the nature of knowledge? (b) How is knowledge obtained? Three questions to keep in mind: 1. What counts as a "scientific" explanation of a phenomenon? • An account of the causes of the phenomenon? • An account that places the phenomenon within a larger explanatory framework? • An account of the phenomenon that indicates how it follows from basic laws of nature? 2. What counts as "scientific" knowledge? • Knowledge of causes, natural laws, and/or general physical principles? • Knowledge based on observation and inductive inference? • Knowledge that makes no appeal to supernatural causes? 3. What distinguishes a natural explanation from a supernatural explanation? • testability? • reliability? • accuracy? • repeatability? II. Pre-Socratics (~6th - 5th cent. B.C.) 1. Milesians and Monism (Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes) Thales ("THAY-leez") ~585 B.C. • The Earth rests on water. • Water is the archê (source) of all things. • All things are full of gods. • The magnet has a soul. Anaximander ("Ah-NAX-ee-mander") ~550 B.C. • Monism based on "apeiron". • "apeiron" = the infinite/indeterminate/unlimited. • lacking in qualities (boundedness, determinateness, limits, etc). Possible motivation • Observable phenomena are constituted from earth, air, fire, water. • But the elements are opposed to each other. • Thus, there must be some basic neutral substratum devoid of qualities out of which everything, including the elements, is constituted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of (Exclusively) Local Beables
    The Theory of (Exclusively) Local Beables Travis Norsen Marlboro College Marlboro, VT 05344 (Dated: June 17, 2010) Abstract It is shown how, starting with the de Broglie - Bohm pilot-wave theory, one can construct a new theory of the sort envisioned by several of QM’s founders: a Theory of Exclusively Local Beables (TELB). In particular, the usual quantum mechanical wave function (a function on a high-dimensional configuration space) is not among the beables posited by the new theory. Instead, each particle has an associated “pilot- wave” field (living in physical space). A number of additional fields (also fields on physical space) maintain what is described, in ordinary quantum theory, as “entanglement.” The theory allows some interesting new perspective on the kind of causation involved in pilot-wave theories in general. And it provides also a concrete example of an empirically viable quantum theory in whose formulation the wave function (on configuration space) does not appear – i.e., it is a theory according to which nothing corresponding to the configuration space wave function need actually exist. That is the theory’s raison d’etre and perhaps its only virtue. Its vices include the fact that it only reproduces the empirical predictions of the ordinary pilot-wave theory (equivalent, of course, to the predictions of ordinary quantum theory) for spinless non-relativistic particles, and only then for wave functions that are everywhere analytic. The goal is thus not to recommend the TELB proposed here as a replacement for ordinary pilot-wave theory (or ordinary quantum theory), but is rather to illustrate (with a crude first stab) that it might be possible to construct a plausible, empirically arXiv:0909.4553v3 [quant-ph] 17 Jun 2010 viable TELB, and to recommend this as an interesting and perhaps-fruitful program for future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Cvi, 1999: 5-24
    Nicholas Huggett OFFICE: HOME: Department of Philosophy, M/C 267, 3730 N. Lake Shore Drive, #3B University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60613 601 South Morgan St, Chicago, IL 60607-7114 Telephone: 312-996-3022 773-818-5495/773-281-5728 Fax: 312-413-2093 Email: [email protected] EMPLOYMENT: 2015- : LAS Distinguished Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago. Spring 2018: Visiting Associate Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago. 2009-15: Full Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago. 2001-9: Associate Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago. 1996-2001: Assistant Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago. 1995-6: Visiting Assistant Professor, Brown University. 1994-5: Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky. EDUCATION: Rutgers University: PhD, 1995. (Dissertation: The Philosophy of Fields and Particles in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, including The Problem of Renormalization. Supervised by Robert Weingard.) Oxford University: BA Hons in Physics and Philosophy, 1988. AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS: Foundational Questions Institute Member, 2017-. Outstanding Graduate Mentor Award, Graduate College, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2015. Professorial Fellow, Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Studies, University of London, April-May 2011. American Council of Learned Societies Collaborative Fellowship, 2010-13. Grant for full-time research. University of Illinois at Chicago Humanities Institute Fellow, 2005-6. Grant for full-time research. University of Illinois at Chicago, University Scholar, 2002-5. National Science Foundation Science and Technology Studies Scholars Award, 2001-2002. Grant for full-time research. !1/!13 Nicholas Huggett University of Illinois at Chicago Humanities Institute Fellow, 1999 -2000. Grant for full-time research.
    [Show full text]
  • String Theory and Pre-Big Bang Cosmology
    IL NUOVO CIMENTO 38 C (2015) 160 DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2015-15160-8 Colloquia: VILASIFEST String theory and pre-big bang cosmology M. Gasperini(1)andG. Veneziano(2) (1) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Bari - Via G. Amendola 173, 70126 Bari, Italy and INFN, Sezione di Bari - Bari, Italy (2) CERN, Theory Unit, Physics Department - CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and Coll`ege de France - 11 Place M. Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France received 11 January 2016 Summary. — In string theory, the traditional picture of a Universe that emerges from the inflation of a very small and highly curved space-time patch is a possibility, not a necessity: quite different initial conditions are possible, and not necessarily unlikely. In particular, the duality symmetries of string theory suggest scenarios in which the Universe starts inflating from an initial state characterized by very small curvature and interactions. Such a state, being gravitationally unstable, will evolve towards higher curvature and coupling, until string-size effects and loop corrections make the Universe “bounce” into a standard, decreasing-curvature regime. In such a context, the hot big bang of conventional cosmology is replaced by a “hot big bounce” in which the bouncing and heating mechanisms originate from the quan- tum production of particles in the high-curvature, large-coupling pre-bounce phase. Here we briefly summarize the main features of this inflationary scenario, proposed a quarter century ago. In its simplest version (where it represents an alternative and not a complement to standard slow-roll inflation) it can produce a viable spectrum of density perturbations, together with a tensor component characterized by a “blue” spectral index with a peak in the GHz frequency range.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Bang Blunder Bursts the Multiverse Bubble
    WORLD VIEW A personal take on events IER P P. PA P. Big Bang blunder bursts the multiverse bubble Premature hype over gravitational waves highlights gaping holes in models for the origins and evolution of the Universe, argues Paul Steinhardt. hen a team of cosmologists announced at a press world will be paying close attention. This time, acceptance will require conference in March that they had detected gravitational measurements over a range of frequencies to discriminate from fore- waves generated in the first instants after the Big Bang, the ground effects, as well as tests to rule out other sources of confusion. And Worigins of the Universe were once again major news. The reported this time, the announcements should be made after submission to jour- discovery created a worldwide sensation in the scientific community, nals and vetting by expert referees. If there must be a press conference, the media and the public at large (see Nature 507, 281–283; 2014). hopefully the scientific community and the media will demand that it According to the team at the BICEP2 South Pole telescope, the is accompanied by a complete set of documents, including details of the detection is at the 5–7 sigma level, so there is less than one chance systematic analysis and sufficient data to enable objective verification. in two million of it being a random occurrence. The results were The BICEP2 incident has also revealed a truth about inflationary the- hailed as proof of the Big Bang inflationary theory and its progeny, ory. The common view is that it is a highly predictive theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 275 Lecture Notes, Spring 2015 C@Edward L. Wright, 2015
    Astronomy 275 Lecture Notes, Spring 2015 c Edward L. Wright, 2015 Cosmology has long been a fairly speculative field of study, short on data and long on theory. This has inspired some interesting aphorisms: Cosmologist are often in error but never in doubt - Landau. • There are only two and a half facts in cosmology: • 1. The sky is dark at night. 2. The galaxies are receding from each other as expected in a uniform expansion. 3. The contents of the Universe have probably changed as the Universe grows older. Peter Scheuer in 1963 as reported by Malcolm Longair (1993, QJRAS, 34, 157). But since 1992 a large number of facts have been collected and cosmology is becoming an empirical field solidly based on observations. 1. Cosmological Observations 1.1. Recession velocities Modern cosmology has been driven by observations made in the 20th century. While there were many speculations about the nature of the Universe, little progress was made until data were obtained on distant objects. The first of these observations was the discovery of the expansion of the Universe. In the paper “THE LARGE RADIAL VELOCITY OF NGC 7619” by Milton L. Humason (1929) we read that “About a year ago Mr. Hubble suggested that a selected list of fainter and more distant extra-galactic nebulae, especially those occurring in groups, be observed to determine, if possible, whether the absorption lines in these objects show large displacements toward longer wave-lengths, as might be expected on de Sitter’s theory of curved space-time. During the past year two spectrograms of NGC 7619 were obtained with Cassegrain spectrograph VI attached to the 100-inch telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • DARK AGES of the Universe the DARK AGES of the Universe Astronomers Are Trying to fill in the Blank Pages in Our Photo Album of the Infant Universe by Abraham Loeb
    THE DARK AGES of the Universe THE DARK AGES of the Universe Astronomers are trying to fill in the blank pages in our photo album of the infant universe By Abraham Loeb W hen I look up into the sky at night, I often wonder whether we humans are too preoccupied with ourselves. There is much more to the universe than meets the eye on earth. As an astrophysicist I have the privilege of being paid to think about it, and it puts things in perspective for me. There are things that I would otherwise be bothered by—my own death, for example. Everyone will die sometime, but when I see the universe as a whole, it gives me a sense of longevity. I do not care so much about myself as I would otherwise, because of the big picture. Cosmologists are addressing some of the fundamental questions that people attempted to resolve over the centuries through philosophical thinking, but we are doing so based on systematic observation and a quantitative methodology. Perhaps the greatest triumph of the past century has been a model of the uni- verse that is supported by a large body of data. The value of such a model to our society is sometimes underappreciated. When I open the daily newspaper as part of my morning routine, I often see lengthy de- scriptions of conflicts between people about borders, possessions or liberties. Today’s news is often forgotten a few days later. But when one opens ancient texts that have appealed to a broad audience over a longer period of time, such as the Bible, what does one often find in the opening chap- ter? A discussion of how the constituents of the universe—light, stars, life—were created.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Cosmology Physics 6010, Fall 2017 Lam Hui
    Physical Cosmology Physics 6010, Fall 2017 Lam Hui My coordinates. Pupin 902. Phone: 854-7241. Email: [email protected]. URL: http://www.astro.columbia.edu/∼lhui. Teaching assistant. Xinyu Li. Email: [email protected] Office hours. Wednesday 2:30 { 3:30 pm, or by appointment. Class Meeting Time/Place. Wednesday, Friday 1 - 2:30 pm (Rabi Room), Mon- day 1 - 2 pm for the first 4 weeks (TBC). Prerequisites. No permission is required if you are an Astronomy or Physics graduate student { however, it will be assumed you have a background in sta- tistical mechanics, quantum mechanics and electromagnetism at the undergrad- uate level. Knowledge of general relativity is not required. If you are an undergraduate student, you must obtain explicit permission from me. Requirements. Problem sets. The last problem set will serve as a take-home final. Topics covered. Basics of hot big bang standard model. Newtonian cosmology. Geometry and general relativity. Thermal history of the universe. Primordial nucleosynthesis. Recombination. Microwave background. Dark matter and dark energy. Spatial statistics. Inflation and structure formation. Perturba- tion theory. Large scale structure. Non-linear clustering. Galaxy formation. Intergalactic medium. Gravitational lensing. Texts. The main text is Modern Cosmology, by Scott Dodelson, Academic Press, available at Book Culture on W. 112th Street. The website is http://www.bookculture.com. Other recommended references include: • Cosmology, S. Weinberg, Oxford University Press. • http://pancake.uchicago.edu/∼carroll/notes/grtiny.ps or http://pancake.uchicago.edu/∼carroll/notes/grtinypdf.pdf is a nice quick introduction to general relativity by Sean Carroll. • A First Course in General Relativity, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy (ASTR) 1
    Astronomy (ASTR) 1 ASTR 5073. Cosmology. 3 Hours. Astronomy (ASTR) An introduction to modern physical cosmology covering the origin, evolution, and structure of the Universe, based on the Theory of Relativity. (Typically offered: Courses Spring Odd Years) ASTR 2001L. Survey of the Universe Laboratory (ACTS Equivalency = PHSC ASTR 5083. Data Analysis and Computing in Astronomy. 3 Hours. 1204 Lab). 1 Hour. Study of the statistical analysis of large data sets that are prevalent in the Daytime and nighttime observing with telescopes and indoor exercises on selected physical sciences with an emphasis on astronomical data and problems. Includes topics. Pre- or Corequisite: ASTR 2003. (Typically offered: Fall, Spring and Summer) computational lab 1 hour per week. Corequisite: Lab component. (Typically offered: Fall Even Years) ASTR 2001M. Honors Survey of the Universe Laboratory. 1 Hour. An introduction to the content and fundamental properties of the cosmos. Topics ASTR 5523. Theory of Relativity. 3 Hours. include planets and other objects of the solar system, the sun, normal stars and Conceptual and mathematical structure of the special and general theories of interstellar medium, birth and death of stars, neutron stars, and black holes. Pre- or relativity with selected applications. Critical analysis of Newtonian mechanics; Corequisite: ASTR 2003 or ASTR 2003H. (Typically offered: Fall) relativistic mechanics and electrodynamics; tensor analysis; continuous media; and This course is equivalent to ASTR 2001L. gravitational theory. (Typically offered: Fall Even Years) ASTR 2003. Survey of the Universe (ACTS Equivalency = PHSC 1204 Lecture). 3 Hours. An introduction to the content and fundamental properties of the cosmos. Topics include planets and other objects of the solar system, the Sun, normal stars and interstellar medium, birth and death of stars, neutron stars, pulsars, black holes, the Galaxy, clusters of galaxies, and cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Evolution of the Universe Baryogenesis
    Physics 224 Spring 2008 Origin and Evolution of the Universe Baryogenesis Lecture 18 - Monday Mar 17 Joel Primack University of California, Santa Cruz Post-Inflation Baryogenesis: generation of excess of baryon (and lepton) number compared to anti-baryon (and anti-lepton) number. in order to create the observed baryon number today it is only necessary to create an excess of about 1 quark and lepton for every ~109 quarks+antiquarks and leptons +antileptons. Other things that might happen Post-Inflation: Breaking of Pecci-Quinn symmetry so that the observable universe is composed of many PQ domains. Formation of cosmic topological defects if their amplitude is small enough not to violate cosmological bounds. There is good evidence that there are no large regions of antimatter (Cohen, De Rujula, and Glashow, 1998). It was Andrei Sakharov (1967) who first suggested that the baryon density might not represent some sort of initial condition, but might be understandable in terms of microphysical laws. He listed three ingredients to such an understanding: 1. Baryon number violation must occur in the fundamental laws. At very early times, if baryon number violating interactions were in equilibrium, then the universe can be said to have “started” with zero baryon number. Starting with zero baryon number, baryon number violating interactions are obviously necessary if the universe is to end up with a non-zero asymmetry. As we will see, apart from the philosophical appeal of these ideas, the success of inflationary theory suggests that, shortly after the big bang, the baryon number was essentially zero. 2. CP-violation: If CP (the product of charge conjugation and parity) is conserved, every reaction which produces a particle will be accompanied by a reaction which produces its antiparticle at precisely the same rate, so no baryon number can be generated.
    [Show full text]
  • NIETZSCHE and NIHILISM Brian Gilbert a Thesis Submitted In
    NIETZSCHE AND NIHILISM Brian Gilbert A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education Department of Theory and Policy Ontario hstitute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto O Copyright by Brian Gilbert (1999) National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON KtA ON4 canada canada Your Me Votre reference Our Ne Notre ref6rence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, ban, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. NIETZSCHE AND NIHILISM Brian Howard Gilbert, Ed. D., 1999 Department of Theory and Policy Studies University of Toronto ABSTRACT The failure of Hegel's attempt at a 'grand' synthesis of Platonic and Christian thought has forced upon continental philosophy a radical rethinking and reevaluation of both metaphysics and theology -what Heidegger has called the onto-theological tradition.
    [Show full text]