Partial bibliography on theism and physical cosmology

Hans Halvorson

September , òýÔÔ

References

[Ô] A. Ashtekar. Loop quantum cosmology: an overview. General Relativity and Gravitation, ¥Ô(¥):ÞýÞ–Þ¥Ô, òýýÀ.

[ò] EW Barnes. Discussion on the evolution of the universe. Nature, Ôò—(çòç¥):ÞÔÀ–Þòò, ÔÀçÔ.

[ç] S.M. Barr. Modern physics and ancient faith. University of Notre Dame Press, òýýç.

[¥] M. Bojowald. Quantum gravity and the big bang. Arxiv preprint astro-ph/ýçýÀ¥Þ—, òýýç.

[ ] M. Bojowald. e early universe in loop quantum cosmology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume ò¥, page ÞÞ. IOP Publishing, òýý .

[â] M. Bojowald. Universe scenarios from loop quantum cosmology. Annalen der Physik, Ô (¥- ):çòâ–ç¥Ô, òýýâ.

[Þ] M. Bojowald. Singularities and quantum gravity. Arxiv preprint gr-qc/ýÞýòÔ¥¥, òýýÞ.

[—] M. Bojowald. Follow the bouncing universe. Scientic American, òÀÀ(¥):¥¥– Ô, òýý—.

[À] M. Bojowald. Harmonic cosmology: how much can we know about a universe before the big bang? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-A, ¥â¥(òýÀâ):òÔç –òÔ ý, òýý—.

[Ôý] M. Bojowald. Quantum nature of cosmological bounces. General Relativity and Gravitation, ¥ý(Ôò):òâ À–òâ—ç, òýý—.

[ÔÔ] M. Bojowald and H. Morales-Técotl. Cosmological applications of loop quantum gravity. e Early Universe and Observational Cosmology, pages ¥òÔ–¥âò, òýý¥.

[Ôò] Martin Bojowald. Zurück vor den Urknall. Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, òýýÀ. English transla- tion: Once before time: a whole story of the universe.

[Ôç] David Burrell et al., editors. Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge University Press, New York, òýÔý.

[Ô¥] J. Byl. e role of belief in modern cosmology. http://www.twu.cc/byl/belief.n.doc.

[Ô ] J. Byl. God and cosmos. Banner of Truth Trust, Carlisle, PA, òýýÔ.

Ô [Ôâ] Lawrence Cahoone. Arguments from nothing: God and quantum cosmology. Zygon, ¥¥(¥):ÞÞÞ–ÞÀâ, òýýÀ.

[ÔÞ] Bernard Carr, editor. Universe or multiverse. Cambridge Univ Pr, òýýÞ.

[ԗ] S. Carroll. Why (almost all) cosmologists are atheists. Faith and Philosophy, òò( ):âòò, òýý .

[ÔÀ] Sean Carroll. Does the universe need God? In James Stump and Alan Padgett, editors, e Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. Wiley-Blackwell, òýÔò.

[òý] W. Carroll. omas Aquinas and big bang cosmology. Sapientia, À : ç–Þç, ÔÀÀ—.

[òÔ] W.E. Carroll. Big bang cosmology, quantum tunneling from nothing, and creation. Laval théologique et philosophique, ¥¥(ÔÀ——): À–Þ , ÔÀ——.

[òò] G. Cleaver. Before the big bang: string theory, God, and the origin of the universe, òýýâ. Metanexus.

[òç] I.B. Cohen. Isaac Newton’s papers and letters on natural philosophy and related documents. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, ÔÀޗ.

[ò¥] Peter Coles. Cosmology: a very short introduction. Oxford Univ Pr, òýýÔ.

[ò ] R. Collins. e argument from design and the many-worlds hypothesis. In W.L. Craig, editor, Philos- ophy of Religion: a Reader and Guide, pages Ôçý–Ô¥—. Rutgers University Press, òýýò.

[òâ] P. Copan and W.L. Craig. Creation out of nothing: a biblical, philosophical, and scientic exploration. Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, MI, òýý¥.

[òÞ] W.Craig. eism and physical cosmology. In Philip Quinn and Charles Taliaferro, editors, A compan- ion to philosophy of religion, page ¥ÔÀ. Wiley-Blackwell, ÔÀÀÀ.

[ò—] W.L. Craig. ‘What place, then, for a creator?’: Hawking on God and creation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, ¥Ô(¥):¥Þç–¥ÀÔ, ÔÀÀý.

[òÀ] W.L. Craig. God and the initial cosmological singularity: a reply to Quentin Smith. Faith and Philoso- phy, À:òç—–¥—, ÔÀÀò.

[çý] W.L. Craig. e Origin and Creation of the Universe: a reply to Adolf Grünbaum. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, ¥ç(ò):òçç–ò¥ý, ÔÀÀò.

[çÔ] W.L. Craig. Prof. Grünbaum on creation. Erkenntnis, ¥ý(ç):çò –ç¥Ô, ÔÀÀ¥.

[çò] W.L. Craig. Hartle-Hawking cosmology and atheism. Analysis, Þ(¥):òÀÔ–òÀ , ÔÀÀÞ.

[çç] W.L. Craig. e ultimate question of origins: God and the beginning of the universe. Astrophysics and Space Science, òâÀ:ÞòÔ–Þç—, ÔÀÀÀ.

[ç¥] W.L.Craig. Naturalism and cosmology. In W.L.Craig and J.P. Moreland, editors, Naturalism: a critical analysis, pages òÔ –ò ò. Routledge, NY, òýýý.

[ç ] W.L. Craig. J. Howard Sobel on the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, çâ(¥): â – —¥, òýýÞ.

ò [çâ] W.L. Craig and Q. Smith. eism, atheism, and big bang cosmology. Oxford University Press, NY, ÔÀÀ .

[çÞ] R.J. Deltete. Hawking on God and creation. Zygon, ò—(¥):¥— – ýâ, ÔÀÀç.

[ç—] R.J. Deltete and R.A. Guy. Hartle-Hawking cosmology and unconditional probabilities. Analysis, Þ(¥):çý¥, ÔÀÀÞ.

[çÀ] W.B. Drees. Beyond the big bang: quantum cosmologies and God. Open Court, Chicago, IL, ÔÀÀý.

[¥ý] J. Earman. Bangs, crunches, whimpers, and shrieks: singularities and acausalities in relativistic space- times. Oxford University Press, NY, ÔÀÀ .

[¥Ô] A.S. Eddington. New pathways in science. Macmillan, NY, ÔÀç .

[¥ò] G.F.R. Ellis. e theology of the anthropic principle. In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy, and C. J. Isham, editors, Quantum cosmology and the laws of nature: scientic perspectives on divine action, pages çâÞ– ¥ý . Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State, ÔÀÀç.

[¥ç] G.F.R. Ellis. Issues in the philosophy of cosmology. In J. Buttereld and J. Earman, editors, Philosophy of Physics, pages Ôԗç–Ôò— . North Holland, òýýâ.

[¥¥] G.F.R. Ellis. Multiverses and ultimate causation. In Fraser Watts, editor, Creation: Law and Probability, page À. Ashgate Publishing, òýý—.

[¥ ] John Farrell. e day without yesterday: Lemaître, Einstein, and the birth of modern cosmology. un- der’s Mouth Press, òýý .

[¥â] H. Friedrich and J. Frauendiener. e conformal structure of spacetime: geometry, analysis, numerics. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, NY, òýýò.

[¥Þ] G. Gasperini et al. Pre-big-bang in string cosmology. Astroparticle Physics, Ô(ç):çÔÞ–ççÀ, ÔÀÀç.

[¥—] M. Gasperini. e universe before the big bang: cosmology and string theory. Springer, NY, òýý—.

[¥À] M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano. e pre-big bang scenario in string cosmology. Physics Reports, çÞç(Ô-ò):Ô–òÔò, òýýç.

[ ý] O. Godart and M. Heller. Un travail inconnu de Georges Lemaître. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, çÔ:ç¥ –ç À, ÔÀޗ.

[ Ô] A. Grünbaum. e pseudo-problem of creation in physical cosmology. Philosophy of Science, â(ç):çÞç–çÀ¥, ÔÀ—À.

[ ò] A. Grünbaum. Creation as a Pseudo-explanation in current physical cosmology. Erkenntnis, ç (Ô):òçç– ò ¥, ÔÀÀÔ.

[ ç] A. Grünbaum. Some comments on William Craig’s ‘creation and big bang cosmology’. Philosophia naturalis, çÔ:òò –çâ, ÔÀÀ¥.

[ ¥] A. Grünbaum. eological misinterpretations of current physical cosmology. Foundations of Physics, òâ: òç– ¥ç, ÔÀÀâ.

ç [ ] A. Grünbaum. A new critique of theological interpretations of physical cosmology. e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Ô(Ô):Ô, òýýý.

[ â] A. Grünbaum. e poverty of theistic cosmology. e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, (¥): âÔ, òýý¥.

[ Þ] V.G. Gurzadyan and R. Penrose. Concentric circles in WMAP data may provide evidence of violent pre-big-bang activity. http://arxiv.org/abs/ÔýÔÔ.çÞýâ, òýÔý.

[ —] Deborah Haarsma. Christian and atheist responses to Big Bang cosmology. In M. Stewart, editor, Science and religion in dialogue, pages ÔçÔ–Ô¥À. Wiley-Blackwell, òýý—.

[ À] I. Hacking. e inverse gambler’s fallacy: the argument from design. e anthropic principle applied to wheeler universes. Mind, Àâ(ç—ç):ççÔ, ÔÀ—Þ.

[âý] M. Heller. Cosmological singularity and the creation of the universe. Zygon, ç (ç):ââ –â— , òýýý.

[âÔ] M. Heller. Ultimate explanations of the universe. Springer, NY, òýýÀ.

[âò] Michael Heller. Creative Tension: Essays on Science and Religion. Templeton Foundation Press, Radnor, PA, òýýç.

[âç] N.S. Hetherington. Cosmology: historical, literary, philosophical, religious, and scientic perspectives. Garland, NY, ÔÀÀç.

[â¥] R.D. Holder. Fine-tuning, multiple universes and theism. Nous, çâ(ò):òÀ –çÔò, òýýò.

[â ] R.D. Holder. God, the multiverse, and everything: modern cosmology and the argument from design. Ashgate, òýý¥.

[ââ] F. Hoyle. Home is where the wind blows: chapters from a cosmologist’s life. University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, ÔÀÀ¥.

[âÞ] C.J. Isham. Quantum theories of the creation of the universe. In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy, and C. J. Isham, editors, Quantum cosmology and the laws of nature: scientic perspectives on divine action, pages ¥À–—À. Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State, ÔÀÀç.

[â—] C. Juhl. Fine-tuning is not surprising. Analysis, ââ(¥):òâÀ, òýýâ.

[âÀ] B. Kanitscheider. Philosophisch-historische Grundlagen der physikalischen Kosmologie. Kohlhammer, ÔÀÞ¥.

[Þý] B. Kanitscheider. Does physical cosmology transcend the limits of naturalistic reasoning? In Paul Weingartner and Georg Dorn, editors, Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise, pages ççÞ–ç ý. Rodopi, ÔÀÀý.

[ÞÔ] B. Kanitscheider. Kosmologie: Geschichte und Systematik in philosophischer Perspektive. Reclam, ÔÀÀÔ.

[Þò] Douglas Kelly. Creation and change: Genesis Ô.Ô–ò.¥ in the light of changing scientic paradigms. Mentor (Christian Focus Publications), Ross-shire, Scotland, òýýý.

[Þç] J. Khoury, B.A. Ovrut, P.J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok. Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang. Physical Review D, â¥(Ôò):Ôòç òò, òýýÔ.

¥ [Þ¥] C. Kiefer. Quantum Gravity – A Short Overview. Quantum Gravity, pages Ô–Ôç, òýýÞ.

[Þ ] Claus Kiefer. Der Quanten-kosmos. Fischer, òýý—.

[Þâ] J. Koperski. Should we care about ne-tuning? e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, â(ò):çýç, òýý .

[ÞÞ] K.J. Kraay. eism, possible worlds, and the multiverse. Philosophical studies, Ô¥Þ(ç):ç –çâ—, òýÔý.

[ޗ] H. Kragh. Cosmology and controversy: the historical development of two theories of the universe. Prince- ton University Press, ÔÀÀÀ.

[ÞÀ] H. Kragh. Matter and spirit in the universe: scientic and religious preludes to modern cosmology. Im- perial College Press, London, òýý¥.

[—ý] H. Kragh. Contemporary history of cosmology and the controversy over the multiverse. Annals of Science, ââ(¥): òÀ– ç, òýýÀ.

[—Ô] H. Kragh. Continual fascination: the oscillating universe in modern cosmology. Science in Context, òò(ý¥): —Þ–âÔò, òýýÀ.

[—ò] Helge Kragh. Conceptions of cosmos: from myths to the accelerating universe. Oxford Univ Pr, òýýÞ.

[—ç] D. Lambert. Un atome d’univers: la vie et l’oeuvre de Georges Lemaître. Lessius, òýýý.

[—¥] Georges Lemaître. L’hypothèse de l’atome primitif. Editions Culture et Civilisation, ÔÀÞò.

[— ] J. Leslie. No inverse gambler’s fallacy in cosmology. Mind, ÀÞ(ç—â):òâÀ, ÔÀ——.

[—â] J. Leslie. Universes. Routledge, ÔÀÀâ.

[—Þ] John Leslie. How to draw conclusions from a ne-tuned cosmos. In Robert Russell et al., editors, Physics, philosophy, and theology: a common quest for understanding, pages çý¥–. Vatican Observatory Press, ÔÀ——.

[——] John Leslie, editor. Modern cosmology and philosophy. Prometheus books, ÔÀÀ—.

[—À] John Leslie. Cosmology and theology. In Charles Tandy, editor, Death and anti-death, volume â, pages ÔòÞ–Ô â. Ria University Press, Palo Alto, CA, òýý—.

[Àý] J.P. Luminet. L’invention du Big Bang. Ed. du Seuil, òýý¥.

[ÀÔ] N.A. Manson and M.J. rush. Fine-tuning, multiple universes, and the “this universe” objection. Pacic Philosophical Quarterly, —¥(Ô):âÞ–—ç, òýýç.

[Àò] N. Markosian. On the argument from quantum cosmology against theism. Analysis, (¥):ò¥Þ, ÔÀÀ .

[Àç] E.L. Mascall. Christian theology and natural science: some questions on their relations. Longmans, Green, & Co., London, ÔÀ â.

[À¥] C.S. McConnell. Twentieth-century cosmologies. In Gary Ferngren, editor, Science and religion: a historical introduction, pages çÔ¥–çòÔ. Johns Hopkins Univ Pr, òýýò.

[À ] PJ McGrath. e inverse gambler’s fallacy and cosmology–a reply to Hacking. Mind, ÀÞ(ç—â):òâ , ÔÀ——.

[Àâ] E. McMullin. How should cosmology relate to theology? In Arthur Peacocke, editor, e sciences and theology in the twentieth century, pages ÔÞ– Þ. Notre Dame University Press, Chicago, IL, ÔÀ—Ô.

[ÀÞ] Ernan McMullin. Cosmology and religion. In Noriss Hetherington, editor, Cosmology: historical, literary, philosophical, religious, and scientic perspectives, pages —Ô–âýâ. Taylor and Francis, ÔÀÀç.

[À—] Jacques Merleau-Ponty. Cosmologie du XX. Siècle. Gallimard, ÔÀâ .

[ÀÀ] Jacques Merleau-Ponty. La science de l’univers a l’âge du positivisme. Vrin, ÔÀ—ç.

[Ôýý] Cyrille Michon. omas d’Aquin et la controverse sur L’Éternité du monde. Flammarion, òýý¥.

[ÔýÔ] C.W. Misner. Absolute zero of time. Physical Review, ԗâ( ):Ôçò—–Ôççç, ÔÀâÀ.

[Ôýò] B. Monton. God, ne-tuning, and the problem of old evidence. e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Þ(ò):¥ý , òýýâ.

[Ôýç] Wes Morriston. Creation ex nihilo and the big bang. Philo, , òýýò.

[Ôý¥] Jayant V. Narlikar. e concepts of “beginning” and “creation” in cosmology. Philosophy of Science, À(ç):çâÔ–çÞÔ, ÔÀÀò.

[Ôý ] H.H. Oliver. e complementarity of theology and cosmology. Zygon, Ôç(Ô):ÔÀ–çç, ÔÀޗ.

[Ôýâ] G. Oppy. On some alleged consequences of ‘the Hartle-Hawking cosmology’. Sophia, çâ(Ô):—¥–À , ÔÀÀÞ.

[ÔýÞ] D.N. Page. Predictions and tests of multiverse theories. Arxiv preprint hep-th/ýâÔýÔýÔ, òýýâ.

[Ôý—] D.N. Page. Does God so love the multiverse? In M. Stewart, editor, Science and religion in dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, òýý—.

[ÔýÀ] R. Penrose. Before the big bang: an outrageous new perspective and its implications for particle physics. European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC ýâ), Edinburgh, Scotland, pages òÞ À–òÞâò, òýýâ.

[ÔÔý] R. Penrose. Black holes, quantum theory and cosmology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, ÔÞ¥:ýÔòýýÔ, òýýÀ.

[ÔÔÔ] Roger Penrose. e basic ideas of conformal cyclic cosmology. In Charles Tandy, editor, Death and anti-death, volume â, pages òòç–ò¥ò. Ria University Press, Palo Alto, CA, òýý—.

[ÔÔò] Roger Penrose. Cycles of time: an extraordinary new view of the universe. Bodley Head, London, òýÔý.

[ÔÔç] A. Philippidis. Cosmic Controversy: e Big Bang and Genesis. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, ¥Þ:ÔÀý–ÔÀ¥, ÔÀÀ .

[ÔÔ¥] Herman Philipse. God in an age of science: a critique of religious reason. Oxford University Press, NY, Forthcoming.

[ÔÔ ] J.B. Pitts. Why the big bang singularity does not help the kalam¯ cosmological argument for theism. e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, À(¥):âÞ , òýý—.

â [ÔÔâ] P. Quinn. Creation, conservation and the Big Bang. In J. Earman et al., editors, Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds, pages —À–âÔò. University of Pittsburgh Press, ÔÀÀç.

[ÔÔÞ] Graeme Rhook and Mark Zangari. Should we believe in the big bang? A critique of the integrity of modern cosmology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, ÔÀÀ¥:òò—–òçÞ, ÔÀÀ¥.

[Ôԗ] H. Ross and J. Rea. Big bang – e Bible taught it rst! Facts for Faith, ç, òýýý.

[ÔÔÀ] Hugh Ross. A beginner’s – and expert’s – guide to the big bang: siŸing facts from ctions. http://www.reasons.org/rtbs-creation-model/tcm-big-bang.

[Ôòý] Carlo Rovelli. Quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press, NY, òýý¥.

[ÔòÔ] R.J. Russell. t = ý, is it theologically signicant? In W. Mark Richardson and Wesley J. Wildman, editors, Religion and science: history, method, dialogue, pages òýÔ–òò¥. Routledge, ÔÀÀâ.

[Ôòò] R.J. Russell. Did God create our universe? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, À ý(Ô):Ôý—–ÔòÞ, òýýÔ.

[Ôòç] R.J. Russell. Cosmology: from alpha to omega: the creative mutual interaction of theology and science. Fortress Pr, òýý—.

[Ôò¥] T. Schick. e big-bang argument for the existence of God. In David Ohreen, editor, Introduction to Philosophy: Knowledge, God, Mind, Morality. omson-Nelson, Toronto, òýýÀ.

[Ôò ] G.L. Schroeder. Genesis and the Big Bang: e discovery of harmony between modern science and the Bible. Bantam Books, ÔÀÀý.

[Ôòâ] H. Schwarz. Eschatology. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI, òýýý.

[ÔòÞ] Kevin Sharpe. e origin of the big bang universe in ultimate reality with special reference to the cosmology of Stephen Hawking. Ultimate Reality and Meaning, òý:âÔ–ÞÔ, ÔÀÀÞ.

[Ôò—] J. Silk. e big bang. Times Books, òýýý.

[ÔòÀ] Chris Smeenk. Approaching the absolute zero of time: theory development in early universe cosmology. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, òýýç.

[Ôçý] Gerrit Smith and Robert Weingard. Quantum cosmology and the beginning of the universe. Philosophy of Science, Þ(¥):ââç–ââÞ, ÔÀÀý.

[ÔçÔ] Q. Smith. A big bang cosmological argument for God’s nonexistence. Faith and Philosophy, À(ò):òý – òòý, ÔÀÀò.

[Ôçò] Q. Smith. Stephen Hawking’s cosmology and theism. Analysis, ¥(¥):òçâ, ÔÀÀ¥.

[Ôçç] Q. Smith. Why Steven Hawking’s cosmology precludes a creator. Philo, ÔÀÀ—.

[Ôç¥] Q. Smith. e reason the universe exists is that it caused itself to exist. Philosophy, Þ¥(òÀý): ÞÀ– —â, ÔÀÀÀ.

Þ [Ôç ] Q. Smith. Problems with John Earman’s attempt to reconcile Theism with general relativity. Erkenntnis, ò(Ô):Ô–òÞ, òýýý.

[Ôçâ] Q. Smith. Why the big bang is no help to theists. In Science and religion: are they compatible?, page âÞ. Prometheus Books, òýýç.

[ÔçÞ] L. Smolin. ree roads to quantum gravity. Basic Books, òýýò.

[Ôç—] Paul J. Steinhardt and Neil Turok. Endless universe: beyond the big bang. Doubleday, NY, òýýÞ.

[ÔçÀ] P.J. Steinhardt and N. Turok. A cyclic model of the universe. Science, òÀâ( Þò):Ô¥çâ–Ô¥çÀ, òýýò.

[Ô¥ý] William Stoeger. e big bang, quantum cosmology and creation ex nihilo. In David Burrell et al., editors, Creation and the God of Abraham, pages Ô ò–ÔÞ . Cambridge University Press, New York, òýÔý.

[Ô¥Ô] William Stoeger. God, physics and the big bang. In Peter Harrison, editor, e Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion, pages ÔÞç–ԗÀ. Cambridge University Press, òýÔý.

[Ô¥ò] WR Stoeger, GFR Ellis, and U. Kirchner. Multiverses and cosmology: philosophical issues. Arxiv preprint astro-ph/ý¥ýÞçòÀ, òýý¥.

[Ô¥ç] R. Swinburne. Is there a God? Oxford University Press, NY, ÔÀÀâ.

[Ô¥¥] F.J. Tipler. e physics of immortality. Doubleday New York, ÔÀÀ .

[Ô¥ ] F.J. Tipler and J. Barrow. e anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford University Press, ÔÀ—â.

[Ô¥â] P. Tod. Penrose’s Weyl curvature hypothesis and conformally-cyclic cosmology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume òòÀ, page ýÔòýÔç. IOP Publishing, òýÔý.

[Ô¥Þ] Rüdiger Vaas. Hawkings neues Universum: Wie es zum Urknall kam. Kosmos, òýý—.

[Ô¥—] G. Veneziano. A simple/short introduction to pre-big-bang physics/cosmology. Arxiv preprint hep- th/À—ýòý Þ, ÔÀÀ—.

[Ô¥À] G. Veneziano. e myth of the beginning of time. Scientic American, pages ¥–â , May òýý¥.

[Ô ý] G. Veneziano. Did time have a beginning? A meeting point for science and philosophy. In Ernesto Carafoli, Gian Antonio Danieli, and Giuseppe O. Longo, editors, e two cultures: shared problems, pages ç–Ôò. Springer, NY, òýýÀ.

[Ô Ô] S. Weinberg. Living in the multiverse. In B. Carr, editor, Universe or multiverse, pages òÀ–¥ò. Cambridge University Press, NY, òýýÞ.

[Ô ò] R. White. Fine-tuning and multiple universes. Nous, ç¥(ò):òâý–òÞâ, òýýý.

[Ô ç] M.W. Worthing. God, creation, and contemporary physics. Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN, ÔÀÀâ.

[Ô ¥] Christian Wüthrich. Approaching the Planck scale from a generally relativistic point of view. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, òýýâ.

[Ô ] Wolfgang Yourgrau and Allen Breck, editors. Cosmology, history and theology. Plenum Press, ÔÀÞÞ.

— [Ô â] H. Zinkernagel. Did time have a beginning? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, òò(ç):òçÞ–ò —, òýý—.

[Ô Þ] Ješrey A. Zweerink. Who’s afraid of the multiverse? Reasons to Believe, òýý—.

À