DOCSLIB.ORG

Opium Winter Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opium Winter Assessment cover_ras_afg2009:cover_ras_afghanistan3.qxd 28/01/2009 12:47 Page 1 Government of Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 500, A-1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43 1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43 1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Afghanistan Opium Winter Assessment January 2009 ABBREVIATIONS AGE Anti Government Elements GPS Global Positioning System ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) ORA Opium Winter Rapid Assessment Survey MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the 2008 Afghanistan Opium Survey and to the preparation of this report: Survey and Monitoring Directorate of the Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Eng. Mohammad Ibrahim Azhar (Director), Mir Abdullah (Deputy Director) Survey Coordinators: Abdul Mateen (Eastern Region), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Western Region), Fida Mohammad (Northern Region), Sayeed Esaq Masomi (Central region), Mohammed Ishaq Anderabi (North-eastern Region), and Hashmatullah Asek (Southern Region). Technical staff: Mohammad Khyber Wardak (Data Expert), Mohammad Ajmal (Data Clerk), Sahar (Data Clerk). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Kabul) Jean-Luc Lemahieu (Country Representative) Shirish Ravan (Project Coordinator, RAS/ICMP), Ziauddin Zaki (National Project Coordinator), Abdul Mannan Ahmadzai (Survey Officer), Sayed Mehdi (Remote Sensing Analyst), Ahmad Jawid (Remote Sensing Analyst), Ramin Sobhi and Zia Ulhaq (Verification Reporters), Devashish Dhar (International Consultant) Survey Coordinators: Abdul Basir Basiret (Eastern Region), Abdul Jalil (Northern Region), Abdul Qadir Palwal (Southern Region), Fawad Alaie (Western Region), Mohammad Rafi Kabiri (North- eastern Region), Rahimullah Omar (Central Region), Sayed Ahmad (Southern Region), Abdul Rahim Marikh (Eastern Region), Fardin Osmani (Northern Region) Provincial Coordinators: Fazal Mohammad Fazli (Southern Region), Mohammad Alam Ghalib (Eastern Region), Altaf Hussain Joya (Western Region), Mohammed Alem Yaqubi (North-eastern Region), Lutfi Rahman Lutfi (Northern Region) United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Vienna) Sandeep Chawla (Director, Division of Policy Analysis and Public Affairs) Angela Me (Chief, Statistics and Surveys Section - SASS) Fernanda Tripodi (Programme Officer, SASS/ICMP), Javier Teran (Statistician, SASS/ICMP), Coen Bussink (Remote Sensing Expert – SASS/ICMP), Patrick Seramy (Database management, SASS/ICMP), Thomas Pietschmann (Research Officer, SASS), The implementation of the survey would not have been possible without the dedicated work of the field surveyors, who often faced difficult security conditions. The UNODC Illicit Crop Monitoring activities in Afghanistan were made possible by financial contributions from the Governments of Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. GENERAL FINDINGS .................................................................................................... 1 1.2. DRIVING FORCES BEHIND OPIUM CULTIVATION TRENDS IN 2009............... 10 1.3. NUMBER OF VILLAGES GROWING OPIUM POPPY ............................................. 14 1.4. CASH ADVANCES RECEIVED FOR POPPY CULTIVATION ................................ 14 1.5. AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANCE ................................................................................ 14 1.6. FIELD SECURITY DURING ORA IMPLEMENTATION.......................................... 15 1.7. ERADICATION AND NON-CULTIVATION OF OPIUM.......................................... 16 1.8. PRICES........................................................................................................................... 17 1.9. OTHER FINDINGS ....................................................................................................... 19 2. FINDINGS BY PROVINCE ................................................................................................. 26 NORTH-EASTERN REGION..................................................................................................... 26 BADAKHSHAN PROVINCE.................................................................................................... 26 TAKHAR PROVINCE .............................................................................................................. 26 KUNDUZ PROVINCE ............................................................................................................. 27 EASTERN REGION.................................................................................................................... 28 NANGARHAR PROVINCE ...................................................................................................... 28 KUNAR PROVINCE ................................................................................................................ 28 LAGHMAN PROVINCE........................................................................................................... 28 NURISTAN PROVINCE........................................................................................................... 29 KAPISA PROVINCE ................................................................................................................ 29 NORTHERN REGION................................................................................................................ 30 BAGHLAN PROVINCE............................................................................................................ 30 BAMYAN PROVINCE.............................................................................................................. 30 BALKH PROVINCE................................................................................................................. 30 FARYAB PROVINCE ............................................................................................................... 31 JAWZJAN PROVINCE............................................................................................................. 31 SAMANGAN PROVINCE......................................................................................................... 31 SARI PUL PROVINCE............................................................................................................. 32 CENTRAL REGION ................................................................................................................... 33 GHAZNI PROVINCE ............................................................................................................... 33 KHOST PROVINCE................................................................................................................. 33 LOGAR PROVINCE................................................................................................................. 33 PAKTIKA PROVINCE ............................................................................................................. 34 PAKTYA PROVINCE ............................................................................................................... 34 PARWAN PROVINCE.............................................................................................................. 34 PANJSHIR PROVINCE............................................................................................................ 35 WARDAK PROVINCE ............................................................................................................. 35 KABUL PROVINCE................................................................................................................. 35 SOUTHERN REGION ................................................................................................................ 36 KANDAHAR PROVINCE......................................................................................................... 36 HILMAND PROVINCE............................................................................................................ 36 URUZGAN PROVINCE ........................................................................................................... 36 ZABUL PROVINCE ................................................................................................................. 37 DAY KUNDI PROVINCE......................................................................................................... 37 WESTERN REGION................................................................................................................... 38 HIRAT PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................38 FARAH PROVINCE................................................................................................................. 38 NIMROZ PROVINCE............................................................................................................... 39 GHOR PROVINCE .................................................................................................................. 39 BADGHIS PROVINCE............................................................................................................. 39 3. METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................. 40 2 MAPS Map 1: Expected opium poppy cultivation trends in 2009 (by province) ......................................2 Map 2: Expected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 26 August 2010
    SIOC – Afghanistan: UNITED NATIONS CONFIDENTIAL UN Department of Safety and Security, Afghanistan Security Situation Report, Week 34, 20 – 26 August 2010 JOINT WEEKLY SECURITY ANALYSIS Countrywide security incidents continued to increase compared to the previous week with the NER, NR, SR and SER, recording higher levels of security incidents. In the ER a minor downward trend continues to be observed over the last three weeks, in the WR and CR records dropped. The dynamics along the south and south-eastern belt of the country vary again with the SR reasserting as the most volatile area. Security incidents were more widespread countrywide with the following provinces being the focus of the week: Kunduz, Baghlan in the NER; Faryab in the NR, Hirat in the WR, Kandahar and Helmand in the SR; Ghazni and Paktika in the SER and Kunar in the ER. Overall the majority of the incidents are initiated by insurgents and those related to armed conflict – armed clashes, IED attacks and stand off attacks - continue to account for the bulk of incidents. Reports of insurgents’ infiltration, re-supply and propaganda are recorded in the NR, SR, SER, ER and CR. These reports might corroborate assumptions that insurgents would profit from the Ramadan time to build up for an escalation into the election and pre-election days. The end of the week was dominated by the reporting of the violent demonstration against the IM base in Qala-i-Naw city following a shoot out at the entrance of the base. Potential for manipulation by the local Taliban and the vicinity of the UN compound to the affected area raised concerns on the security of the UN staff and resulted in the evacuation of the UN building.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Atlas Part IV
    PART IV 99 DESCRIPTION PART IV OF WATERSHEDS I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED II. AMU DARYA RIVER BASIN III. NORTHERN RIVER BASIN IV. HARIROD-MURGHAB RIVER BASIN V. HILMAND RIVER BASIN VI. KABUL (INDUS) RIVER BASIN VII. NON-DRAINAGE AREAS PICTURE 84 Aerial view of Panjshir Valley in Spring 2003. Parwan, 25 March 2003 100 I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED Part IV of the Watershed Atlas describes the 41 watersheds Graphs 21-32 illustrate the main characteristics on area, popu- defined in Afghanistan, which includes five non-drainage areas lation and landcover of each watershed. Graph 21 shows that (Map 10 and 11). For each watershed, statistics on landcover the Upper Hilmand is the largest watershed in Afghanistan, are presented. These statistics were calculated based on the covering 46,882 sq. km, while the smallest watershed is the FAO 1990/93 landcover maps (Shapefiles), using Arc-View 3.2 Dasht-i Nawur, which covers 1,618 sq. km. Graph 22 shows that software. Graphs on monthly average river discharge curve the largest number of settlements is found in the Upper (long-term average and 1978) are also presented. The data Hilmand watershed. However, Graph 23 shows that the largest source for the hydrological graph is the Hydrological Year Books number of people is found in the Kabul, Sardih wa Ghazni, of the Government of Afghanistan – Ministry of Irrigation, Ghorband wa Panjshir (Shomali plain) and Balkhab watersheds. Water Resources and Environment (MIWRE). The data have Graph 24 shows that the highest population density by far is in been entered by Asian Development Bank and kindly made Kabul watershed, with 276 inhabitants/sq.
    [Show full text]
  • First Edition Dec 2009 I
    First Edition Dec 2009 i Purpose To ensure that U.S. Army personnel have a relevant, comprehensive guide to use in capacity building and counterinsurgency operations while deployed in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ii TABLE OF CONTENTS History ....................................................................................................................... 1 Political ..................................................................................................................... 9 Flag of Afghanistan ............................................................................................ 11 Political Map ....................................................................................................... 12 Political Structure .............................................................................................. 13 Relevant Country Data .......................................................................................... 15 Location and Bordering Countries ................................................................... 16 Comparative Area .............................................................................................. 17 Social Statistics .................................................................................................. 18 Economy ............................................................................................................. 19 Land Use and Economic Activity ..................................................................... 20 Military Operational Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict First Quarter Update: 1 January to 31 March 2021
    AFGHANISTAN PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT FIRST QUARTER UPDATE: 1 JANUARY TO 31 MARCH 2021 Between 1 January and 31 March 2021, the United The increase in civilian casualties compared with the Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) first quarter of 2020 was mainly driven by the same documented 1,783 civilian casualties (573 killed and trends that caused the increase of civilian casualties in 1,210 injured), highlighting the urgent need for the last quarter of last year – ground engagements, measures to reduce violence and the ultimate, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and targeted overarching need to reach a lasting peace agreement. killings all continued to have an extreme impact on The number of civilians killed and injured increased by civilians during this year’s comparatively warm winter. 29 per cent compared with the first quarter of 2020; In addition, there was no agreement by the parties to this also included increases in both women (up 37 per reduce violence in the first three months of 2021, which cent) and child casualties (up 23 per cent).1 Of specific could have had a significant positive impact on concern, UNAMA documented a 38 per cent increase in civilians, as the reduction in violence week had in civilian casualties in the six months after the start of the February 2020.3 UNAMA has reiterated repeatedly that Afghanistan Peace Negotiations in September 2020 in it has documented measurable decreases in the comparison to the same period a year earlier, number of civilian casualties during ceasefires.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Opium Survey 2007
    Government of Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics Afghanistan Opium Survey 2007 Executive Summary August 2007 ABBREVIATIONS AEF Afghan Eradication Force ANP Afghan National Police GPS Global Positioning System ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics RAS Research and Analysis Section (UNODC) UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the 2007 Afghanistan Opium Survey and to the preparation of this report: Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Eng. Ibrahim Azhar (Director, Survey and Monitoring Section), Mir Abdullah (Deputy Director, Survey and Monitoring Section), Khiali Jan (Survey Coordinator for the central region), Sayed Mehdi (Remote Sensing Analyst), Ghulam Abbas (Remote Sensing Analyst), Abdul Mateen (Survey Coordinator for Nangarhar province), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Survey Coordinator for Hirat province), Fida Mohammad (Survey Coordinator for Balkh province), Mohammed Ishaq Anderabi (Survey Coordinator for Badakhshan province), Mohammad Khyber Wardak (Data Expert), Arzo Omid (Data Clerk), Mohammad Ajmal (Data Clerk), Sahar (Data Clerk). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Kabul) Christina Oguz (Country Representative), Hakan Demirbüken (Regional Illicit Crop Monitoring Expert for South-West Asia and Survey Project Manager, RAS/ICMP), Shirish Ravan (International Project Coordinator, RAS/ICMP), Nazir Ahmad Shah (National Project Coordinator), Ziauddin Zaki (Data Analyst), Abdul Mannan Ahmadzai
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Opium Survey 2011
    Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics Ministry of Counter Narcotics Banayee Bus Station, Jalalabad Main Road 9th District, Kabul, Afghanistan Tel.: (+93) 799891851, www.mcn.gov.af AFGHANISTAN OPIUM SURVEY 2011 OPIUM SURVEY AFGHANISTAN Afghanistan Opium Survey 2011 Summary findings OCTOBER 2011 ABBREVIATIONS AGE Anti-government Elements ANP Afghan National Police CNPA Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan GLE Governor-led eradication ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) ISAF International Security Assistance Force MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics SMD Survey and Monitoring Directorate (MCN) UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the 2011 Afghanistan Opium Survey and to the preparation of this report: Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Mohammad Ibrahim Azhar (Deputy Minister), Haroon Rashid Sherzad (Director General), Policy &Coordination, Mir Abdullah (Deputy Director of Survey and Monitoring Directorate), Saraj Ahmad (Deputy Director of Survey and Monitoring Directorate), Mohammad Khyber Wardak (Database officer), Mohammad Sadiq Rizaee (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), Shiraz Khan Hadawe (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), Mohammad Ajmal (Data entry clerk), Sahar Yousofzai (Data entry clerk), Mohammad Hakim Hayat (Data entry clerk). Survey Coordinators: Sayed Eshaq Masumi (Central Region), Abdul Mateen (Eastern Region), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Western Region), Fida Mohammad (Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 MAY 2013 Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012
    Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics Ministry of Counter Narcotics Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Banayee Bus Station, Jalalabad Main Road Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org 9th District, Kabul, Afghanistan Tel.: (+93) 799891851, www.mcn.gov.af AFGHANISTAN OPIUM SURVEY 2011 OPIUM SURVEY AFGHANISTAN Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 2013 MAY Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 ABBREVIATIONS AGE Anti-government Elements ANP Afghan National Police CNPA Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan GLE Governor-led Eradication ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) ISAF International Security Assistance Force MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the Afghanistan Opium Survey and to the preparation of this report: Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Mohammad Ibrahim Azhar (Deputy Minister), Haroon Rashid Sherzad (Deputy Minister), Mir Abdullah Sadat (Director of Narcotics Survey Directorate), Saraj Ahmad (Deputy Director of Narcotics Survey Directorate), Nasir Ahmad (Deputy Director of Narcotics Survey Directorate), Shiraz Khan Hadawe (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), Mohammad Sadiq Rizaee (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), , Mohammad Ajmal (Database Officer), Sayed Najibullah Ahmadi (Economic Specialist) ,Sahar Yousofzai (Data Entry Clerk), Mohammad Hakim Hayat (Data Entry Clerk), Sayed Shainsha Sadat (Data Entry Clerk), Fazel Karim Alimi (Admin/Finance Assistant) and Hamida Hussaini (Administrative Officer). Survey Coordinators: Sayed Eshaq Masumi (Central Region), Abdul Mateen (Eastern Region), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Western Region), Fida Mohammad (Northern Region), Mohammed Ishaq Anderabi (North-eastern Region), Khalil Ahmad Noori (Southern Region) and Khiali Jan Mangal (Eradication Verification and Opium Yield coordinator).
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANSO REPORT -Not for Copy Or Sale
    The Afghanistan NGO Safety Office Issue: 67 1-15 February 2011 ANSO and our donors accept no liability for the results of any activity conducted or omitted on the basis of this report. THE ANSO REPORT -Not for copy or sale- Inside this Issue COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 2 Historically, February pre- dislodgement of AOG in fluid context where the 7 Northern Region sents as one of the least light of these operations various groups (arbakis- Western Region 14 ‘kinetic’ months of the year, will need to be monitored ALP-AOG) are beginning partially due to the harsh cli- in the short term. to clash due to competing Eastern Region 16 mactic conditions that ham- In contrast, AOG opera- interests, and the resulting Southern Region 19 per all parties to the conflict. tions, beyond the standard power struggle is creating a However, following an ex- paradoxical destabilising ANSO Info Page 23 tactical efforts of IEDs and tremely active January, this close range attacks, were element. It is advised that month will likely break with highlighted by the focus on NGOs monitor the pro- this trend as armed opposi- regional centres this period. gress of these programs as YOU NEED TO KNOW tion has accounted for 380 The concentrated IED they will be a defining dy- incidents this period alone. namic, particularly at a lo- • Security force operations in campaign in Jalalabad and Put into perspective, by mid- the shopping centre suicide cal level, for the upcoming the North, South, and Cen- month, 70% of the February year. tral attack in Kabul (the 2nd 2010 total has been reached this year), while notewor- This period also accounted • AOG focused attacks (see graph p.5).
    [Show full text]
  • “Democracy” in Afghanistan
    Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Synthesis Paper Series DECONSTRUCTING “DEMOCRACY” IN AFGHANISTAN Anna Larson May 2011 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Synthesis Paper Series DECONSTRUCTING “DEMOCRACY” IN AFGHANISTAN Anna Larson This study was partially funded by the Foundation of May 2011 the Open Society Institute, Afghanistan (FOSIA) AREU Synthesis Paper Series Editing and Layout: Oliver Lough Cover Photograph: Election posters near Pul-i-Sokhta, Kabul, 2010 (Farid Ahmad, AREU) AREU Publication Code: 1110E © 2011 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Some rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted only for non-commercial purposes and with written credit to AREU and the author. Where this publication is reproduced, stored or transmitted electronically, a link to AREU’s website (www. areu.org. af) should be provided. Any use of this publication falling outside of these permissions requires prior writtenpermission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be sought by emailing [email protected]. af or by calling +93 (0) 799 608 548. Deconstructing “Democracy” in Afghanistan About the Author Anna Larson is an independent consultant on governance and democratisation in Afghanistan. Between 2006 and 2010 she was a researcher with the gender and later governance teams at the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, and has been working in Afghanistan on governance and gender issues since 2004. She has an MSc in Violence, Conflict and Development from SOAS, University of London, and is a PhD candidate at the Post-war Recovery and Development Unit (PRDU) at York University, where she is studying democratisation processes in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • (KABUL Province) District Assessment
    NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA ISAF Joint Command District Assessments 100408 NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA As of: 081955DAPR10 NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA IJC District Assessments • Focused on Key Terrain and Area of Interest Districts • Based on “Bottom-Up” RC Analysis and Inputs • Statistical Data to support Trends Development • Collaborative Supporting Analysis • Operational Assessment Process • Assessment Packet – Base Assessment Slide – Written Assessment – Data Charts – Other Supporting Material NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA As of: 081955DAPR10 NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA Key Terrain and Area of Interest Districts Key Terrain Districts (80) Area of Interest Districts (41) Other ISAF Presence Unfinished Road NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA As of: 081955DAPR10 NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA IJC Overall District Assessments Percentage of Key Terrain Districts Neutral 35% Sympathy for Sympathy for INS Not Assessed GIRoA Support INS 32% Population actively Population Population Population actively 0% Population neutral/on Not Assessed* 26% 7% supporting Govt and sympathizing w/ Govt sympathizing with supporting the fence Support GIRoA Security Forces and Security Forces Insurgents Insurgency 0% NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA As of: 081955DAPR10 NATO/ISAF UNCLASSIFIED REL GIROA District Governance Assessments Percentage of Key Terrain Districts Unproductive Dysfunctional 35% 23% Non-existent Full authority Unproductive Non-existent Not Assessed Emerging Emerging Dysfunctional 14% 24% Not Assessed Full Authority
    [Show full text]
  • The ANSO Report (1-15 November 2011)
    CONFIDENTIAL— NGO use only No copy, forward or sale © INSO 2011 Issue 85 REPORT 1‐15 November 2011 Index COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 1-5 With echoes of mid-year 2010, the recent for comparative graphs). Northern Region 6-10 spate of NGO staff abductions in Faryab In broader conflict dynamics, IED’s re- Western Region 11-12 provided the defining dynamic affecting main a keystone tactical element with this the NGO community this period, with 4 period being no exception. Despite minor Eastern Region 13-16 separate incidents (including 3 actual ab- periodic fluctuations, the detonation (both ductions and one near miss) reported in Southern Region 17-21 actual and premature) to discovery rate just over a fortnight. The death of 2 NGO ANSO Info Page 22 remains relatively stable at roughly 50/50, a national staff members in one incident also rate that also is generally unaffected by the proved to be the most significant occur- changing volumes (+/-) of device deploy- rence resulting from these. While the exact ment. Of note, civilians remain the most HIGHLIGHTS causative factors of this short-term trend affected, accounting for 55% of all IED remains shrouded, it is likely a mix result- related deaths this period with the ANP NGO abductions in ing from the fluid operational environment Faryab second to this for a further 38%. These in which these incidents happened (AOG statistics bear out the reality that with the migrations, indigenous vs. exogenous 2 NGO staff fatalities continued expansive use of victim operated this period groups, and security force operations), devices, particularly when coupled with the command and control issues related to the high exposure rate these 2 groups experi- Civilians remain most mixed nature of AOG elements through- ence, this will continue to be the case affected by IED detona- out the North, as well as possible local through to the conclusion of 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Structures in Nimroz Province
    Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series Governance Structures in Nimroz Province Anna Larson November 2010 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Editing and layout: Oliver lough © 2010 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Some rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted only for non-commercial purposes and with written credit to AREU and the author. Where this publication is reproduced, stored or transmitted electronically, a link to AREU’s website (www.areu.org.af) should be provided. Any use of this publication falling outside of these permissions requires prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be sought by emailing [email protected] or by calling +93 (0) 799 608 548. ii Governance Structures in Nimroz Province About the Author Anna Larson is a researcher with the governance team at AREU, and has been working in Afghanistan on governance and gender issues since 2004. She has an MSc in Violence, Conflict and Development from SOAS, University of London, and is an MPhil candidate at the Post-war Recovery and Development Unit (PRDU) at York University, where she is studying democratisation processes in Afghanistan. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research institute based in Kabul. AREU’s mission is to inform and influence policy and practice through conducting high-quality, policy-relevant research and actively disseminating the results, and to promote a culture of research and learning. To achieve its mission AREU engages with policymakers, civil society, researchers and students to promote their use of AREU’s research and its library, to strengthen their research capacity, and to create opportunities for analysis, reflection and debate.
    [Show full text]