DOCSLIB.ORG

Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 MAY 2013 Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 MAY 2013 Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics Ministry of Counter Narcotics Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Banayee Bus Station, Jalalabad Main Road Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org 9th District, Kabul, Afghanistan Tel.: (+93) 799891851, www.mcn.gov.af AFGHANISTAN OPIUM SURVEY 2011 OPIUM SURVEY AFGHANISTAN Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 2013 MAY Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 ABBREVIATIONS AGE Anti-government Elements ANP Afghan National Police CNPA Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan GLE Governor-led Eradication ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) ISAF International Security Assistance Force MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the Afghanistan Opium Survey and to the preparation of this report: Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Mohammad Ibrahim Azhar (Deputy Minister), Haroon Rashid Sherzad (Deputy Minister), Mir Abdullah Sadat (Director of Narcotics Survey Directorate), Saraj Ahmad (Deputy Director of Narcotics Survey Directorate), Nasir Ahmad (Deputy Director of Narcotics Survey Directorate), Shiraz Khan Hadawe (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), Mohammad Sadiq Rizaee (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), , Mohammad Ajmal (Database Officer), Sayed Najibullah Ahmadi (Economic Specialist) ,Sahar Yousofzai (Data Entry Clerk), Mohammad Hakim Hayat (Data Entry Clerk), Sayed Shainsha Sadat (Data Entry Clerk), Fazel Karim Alimi (Admin/Finance Assistant) and Hamida Hussaini (Administrative Officer). Survey Coordinators: Sayed Eshaq Masumi (Central Region), Abdul Mateen (Eastern Region), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Western Region), Fida Mohammad (Northern Region), Mohammed Ishaq Anderabi (North-eastern Region), Khalil Ahmad Noori (Southern Region) and Khiali Jan Mangal (Eradication Verification and Opium Yield coordinator). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Kabul) Jean-Luc Lemahieu (Country Representative), Ashita Mittal (Deputy Representative, Programme), Devashish Dhar (International Project Coordinator), Ziauddin Zaki (National Project Coordinator), Abdul Manan Ahmadzai (Senior Survey Officer), Noor Mohammad Sadiq (Database Developer). Remote sensing analysts: Ahmad Jawid Ghiasee and Sayed Mehdi Sadat. Eradication reporters: Zia Ulhaq Sidiqi. Survey Coordinators: Abdul Basir Basiret (Eastern Region), Bashir Ahmad Shakir (Southern Region), Fawad Ahmad Alaie (Western Region), Sayed Emran Mehrwarz (North-eastern Region), Rahimullah Omar (Central Region). Provincial Coordinators: Mohammad Alam Ghalib (Eastern Region), Altaf Hussain Joya (Western Region), Lutfurhaman Lutfi (Northern Region). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Vienna) Sandeep Chawla (Director, Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs), Angela Me (Chief, Research and Trend Analysis Branch), Martin Raithelhuber (Programme Officer), Philip Davis (Statistician), Coen Bussink (GIS & Remote Sensing Expert), Irmgard Zeiler (Research Expert), Suzanne Kunnen (Public Information Assistant), Jonathan Gibbons (Editor). The implementation of the survey would not have been possible without the dedicated work of the field surveyors, who often faced difficult security conditions. The MCN/UNODC Illicit Crop Monitoring activities in Afghanistan were made possible by financial contributions from the Governments of Germany, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The support of aerial photographs provided by Alcis Ltd. for ground truth information is acknowledged. 2 Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 CONTENTS KEY FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 11 FACT SHEET AFGHANISTAN OPIUM SURVEY 2012 ........................................................ 13 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 17 2 OPIUM CULTIVATION ............................................................................................ 18 2.1 NATIONAL AND REGIONAL OPIUM CULTIVATION TRENDS................................. 18 2.2 REGIONAL BREAKDOWN ............................................................................................... 24 3 ERADICATION ........................................................................................................... 33 3.1 POPPY ERADICATION INCREASED BY 154% IN 2012 ............................................... 33 3.2 QUALITY CONTROL OF REPORTED ERADICATION WITH SATELLITE IMAGES 39 4 POTENTIAL OPIUM YIELD AND PRODUCTION .............................................. 40 4.1 POTENTIAL OPIUM YIELD AND PRODUCTION DECREASED IN 2012 ................... 40 4.2 REVISION OF POTENTIAL OPIUM PRODUCTION IN AFGHANISTAN 2006-2009 .. 43 4.3 OPIUM POPPY VARIETIES .............................................................................................. 46 5 RESULTS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY .............................................. 47 5.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY 2012 .................................................................................. 47 5.2 THE LINK BETWEEN SECURITY AND OPIUM CULTIVATION ................................ 47 5.3 ACCESS TO MARKETS ..................................................................................................... 48 5.4 OPIUM POPPY CULTIVATION, ACCESS TO BASIC DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES AND AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANCE ............................................................................ 49 5.5 POPPY AND CANNABIS CULTIVATION ARE CLOSELY RELATED ........................ 52 5.6 REASONS FOR CULTIVATING OPIUM POPPY ............................................................ 54 5.7 DAILY WAGES FOR OPIUM LANCING ......................................................................... 56 5.8 OUTSTANDING LOANS ................................................................................................... 56 5.9 INCOME OF FARMING HOUSEHOLDS ......................................................................... 57 6 THE OPIATE ECONOMY ......................................................................................... 59 6.1 OPIUM PRICES ................................................................................................................... 59 6.2 FARM-GATE VALUE OF OPIUM PRODUCTION AND INCOME FROM OPIUM ...... 62 6.3 POTENTIAL VALUE OF THE OPIATE ECONOMY ....................................................... 64 7 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 71 7.1 ESTIMATION OF AREA UNDER OPIUM CULTIVATION ............................................ 71 7.2 SATELLITE IMAGE INTERPRETATION ........................................................................ 76 7.3 OPIUM YIELD AND PRODUCTION ................................................................................ 82 7.4 ERADICATION VERIFICATION METHODOLOGY ...................................................... 85 7.5 VILLAGE SURVEY METHODOLOGY ............................................................................ 86 7.6 AVERAGE FARM-GATE PRICE AND FARM-GATE VALUE OF OPIUM PRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 88 7.7 ESTIMATING THE VALUE OF THE AFGHAN OPIATE ECONOMY .......................... 88 ANNEX I: OPIUM POPPY CULTIVATION PER PROVINCE, 2002-2012 (HECTARES) 92 3 Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 ANNEX II: INDICATIVE DISTRICT LEVEL ESTIMATES OF OPIUM CULTIVATION, 2001-2012 (HECTARES) .............................................................................................................. 93 ANNEX III: ERADICATION FIGURES, BY DISTRICT (2012) ............................................ 99 ANNEX IV: ERADICATION SCENES, BY REGION ........................................................... 102 ANNEX V: SELECTED EXAMPLES OF ERADICATION OVER- AND UNDER- REPORTING .............................................................................................................................. 106 4 Afghanistan Opium Survey 2012 FIGURES Figure 1: Opium cultivation in Afghanistan, 1994-2012 (Hectares)................................................. 18 Figure 2: Global opium cultivation, 1997-2012 (Hectares) ............................................................... 21 Figure 3: Opium cultivation in Nangarhar province, 1994-2012 (Hectares) ................................... 25 Figure 4: Opium cultivation in Laghman, Kunar , Nuristan and Kapisa provinces, 1994-2012 (Hectares) ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 5: Opium cultivation in Badakhshan province, 1994-2012 (Hectares) ................................ 27 Figure 6: Opium cultivation in the Northern region, 2004-2012 (Hectares) ................................... 28 Figure 7: Opium cultivation in Day Kundi province, 1994-2012 ..................................................... 30 Figure 8: Opium cultivation in Hilmand, Kandahar and Uruzgan provinces, 2004-2012 (Hectares) ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 9: Opium cultivation in Badghis province, 2004-2012 (Hectares) ........................................ 32 Figure 10: Opium cultivation in Farah province, 1994-2012 (Hectares)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conflict Analysis: Baharak District, Badakhshan Province
    Conflict analysis: Baharak district, Badakhshan province ACKU Cole Hansen, Christian Dennys and Idrees Zaman CPAU February 2009 Cooperation for Peace and Unity Acknowledgment The conflict analysis is one of 5 provincial studies focusing on Badakhshan, Kunduz, Kabul, Wardak and Ghazni conducted by CPAU with the financial support of Trocaire. The views expressed in the papers are the sole responsibility of CPAU and the authors and are not necessarily held by Trocaire. The principal researcher for this provincial study of Badakhshan would like to thank the other members of the research team in London for their support and the CPAU staff in Kabul who collected the primary data from the field and offered feedback on successive drafts of the study. Copies of this paper can be downloaded from www.cpau.org.af For further information or to contact CPAU please email: Idrees Zaman [email protected] Christian Dennys [email protected] ACKU Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Definitions and Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Primary sources .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 26 August 2010
    SIOC – Afghanistan: UNITED NATIONS CONFIDENTIAL UN Department of Safety and Security, Afghanistan Security Situation Report, Week 34, 20 – 26 August 2010 JOINT WEEKLY SECURITY ANALYSIS Countrywide security incidents continued to increase compared to the previous week with the NER, NR, SR and SER, recording higher levels of security incidents. In the ER a minor downward trend continues to be observed over the last three weeks, in the WR and CR records dropped. The dynamics along the south and south-eastern belt of the country vary again with the SR reasserting as the most volatile area. Security incidents were more widespread countrywide with the following provinces being the focus of the week: Kunduz, Baghlan in the NER; Faryab in the NR, Hirat in the WR, Kandahar and Helmand in the SR; Ghazni and Paktika in the SER and Kunar in the ER. Overall the majority of the incidents are initiated by insurgents and those related to armed conflict – armed clashes, IED attacks and stand off attacks - continue to account for the bulk of incidents. Reports of insurgents’ infiltration, re-supply and propaganda are recorded in the NR, SR, SER, ER and CR. These reports might corroborate assumptions that insurgents would profit from the Ramadan time to build up for an escalation into the election and pre-election days. The end of the week was dominated by the reporting of the violent demonstration against the IM base in Qala-i-Naw city following a shoot out at the entrance of the base. Potential for manipulation by the local Taliban and the vicinity of the UN compound to the affected area raised concerns on the security of the UN staff and resulted in the evacuation of the UN building.
    [Show full text]
  • Schnellrecherche Der SFH-Länderanalyse Vom 23
    Schnellrecherche der SFH-Länderanalyse vom 23. August 2017 zu Afghanistan: Rekrutierung und Reflexverfolgung im Distrikt Khanabad, Provinz Kunduz Fragen an die SFH-Länderanalyse: Inwiefern laufen junge Männer in Khanabad/Kunduz Gefahr, durch die Tali- ban, IS/Daesh oder andere Gruppen rekrutiert zu werden? Welche Informationen gibt es über die Verfolgung von Familienangehörigen von Polizisten durch die Taliban, IS/Daesh oder andere Gruppen in Khana- bad/Kunduz? Die Informationen beruhen auf einer zeitlich begrenzten Recherche (Schnellrecher- che) in öffentlich zugänglichen Dokumenten, die uns derzeit zur Verfügung stehen, sowie auf den Informationen von sachkundigen Kontaktpersonen. 1 Aktuelle Präsenz der Taliban in Kunduz einschliesslich Khanabad Taliban sollen aktuell grosse Teile des Distrikts Khanabad sowie anderer Dis- trikte in der Provinz Kunduz kontrollieren, weitere Teile sind umkämpft. Laut einem Artikel des Long War Journal (LWJ) vom 9. Mai 2017 standen die Taliban zu diesem Zeitpunkt kurz davor, die Kontrolle über den Distrikt Khanabad wieder zu erlangen. Nach eigenen Angaben kontrollierten sie 80 Prozent von Khanabad ein- schliesslich des Distriktzentrums sowie grosse Teile von weit eren Distrikten in der Provinz Kunduz. Zwar seien die Angaben der Taliban bezüglich Gebietskontrolle schwierig zu bewerten. LWJ hält sie allerdings für glaubhaft. Darüber hinaus unter- schieden sie sich nicht grundlegend von einer entsprechenden Einschätzung des US-amerikanischen Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). Zuvor hatten die Taliban laut Reuters (20. August 2016) die Kontrolle über den Dis- trikt Khanabad im August 2016 erlangt. Im Oktober 2016 eroberten sie laut NYT (3. Oktober 2016) mehrere Quartiere im Zentrum der Provinzhauptstadt Kunduz. Bereits im Oktober 2015 gehörte Khanabad gemäss LWJ (13.
    [Show full text]
  • Usama Bin Ladin's
    Usama bin Ladin’s “Father Sheikh”: Yunus Khalis and the Return of al-Qa`ida’s Leadership to Afghanistan Harmony Program Kevin Bell USAMA BIN LADIN’S “FATHER SHEIKH:” YUNUS KHALIS AND THE RETURN OF AL‐QA`IDA’S LEADERSHIP TO AFGHANISTAN THE COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER AT WEST POINT www.ctc.usma.edu 14 May 2013 The views expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of the Combating Terrorism Center, the U.S. Military Academy, the Department of Defense or the U.S. government. Author’s Acknowledgments This report would not have been possible without the generosity and assistance of the director of the Harmony Research Program at the Combating Terrorism Center (CTC), Don Rassler. Mr. Rassler provided me with the support and encouragement to pursue this project, and his enthusiasm for the material always helped to lighten my load. I should state here that the first tentative steps on this line of inquiry were made during my time as a student at the Program in Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University. If not for professor Şükrü Hanioğlu’s open‐minded approach to directing my MA thesis, it is unlikely that I would have embarked on this investigation of Yunus Khalis. Professor Michael Reynolds also deserves great credit for his patience with this project as a member of my thesis committee. I must also extend my utmost appreciation to my reviewers—Carr Center Fellow Michael Semple, professor David Edwards and Vahid Brown—whose insightful comments, I believe, have led to a substantially improved and more thoughtful product.
    [Show full text]
  • The ANSO Report (16-30 September 2010)
    The Afghanistan NGO Safety Office Issue: 58 16-30 September 2010 ANSO and our donors accept no liability for the results of any activity conducted or omitted on the basis of this report. THE ANSO REPORT -Not for copy or sale- Inside this Issue COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 2-7 The impact of the elections and Zabul while Ghazni of civilian casualties are 7-9 Western Region upon CENTRAL was lim- and Kandahar remained counter-productive to Northern Region 10-15 ited. Security forces claim extremely volatile. With AOG aims. Rather it is a that this calm was the result major operations now un- testament to AOG opera- Southern Region 16-20 of effective preventative derway in various parts of tional capacity which al- Eastern Region 20-23 measures, though this is Kandahar, movements of lowed them to achieve a unlikely the full cause. An IDPs are now taking place, maximum of effect 24 ANSO Info Page AOG attributed NGO ‘catch originating from the dis- (particularly on perceptions and release’ abduction in Ka- tricts of Zhari and Ar- of insecurity) for a mini- bul resulted from a case of ghandab into Kandahar mum of risk. YOU NEED TO KNOW mistaken identity. City. The operations are In the WEST, Badghis was The pace of NGO incidents unlikely to translate into the most affected by the • NGO abductions country- lasting security as AOG wide in the NORTH continues onset of the elections cycle, with abductions reported seem to have already recording a three fold in- • Ongoing destabilization of from Faryab and Baghlan.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme/Harsh Weather Weekly Situation Report, 1 February-12 March 2017
    HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME EXTREME/HARSH WEATHER WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT, 1 FEBRUARY-12 MARCH 2017 Highlights 33 affected provinces 8,209 affected families reported 553 houses completely destroyed 2,282 houses severely damaged 501 houses partially damaged 202 individual deaths 127 individuals injured 3,439 affected families verified following assessments 1,998 families assisted by IOM Distribution of relief items to avalanche-affected families in Badakhshan on 21 February. © IOM 2017 Situation Overview Extreme weather conditions, including avalanches, floods, and heavy snowfall have affected 33 provinces of Afghanistan as of 3 February 2017. Badakhshan and Nooristan provinces were severely hit by two avalanches, resulting in causalities and destruction of houses, followed by flash floods on 18 February that significantly impacted Herat, Zabul and Nimroz provinces. An estimated 8,209 families were reportedly affected across Afghanistan, with 202 deaths and 127 persons sustaining injuries across the country. The majority of the reported caseloads have been assessed, with a total 3,439 families in need of assistance, while the distribution of relief items is underway and expected to be completed by 15 March 2017. Snow and flash floods damaged major roads in Afghanistan, delaying assessments and the dispatching of relief assistance to affected families. Rescuers were unable to reach snow-hit districts in the north, northeast, central, central highland, west, and eastern regions. The majority of the highways and roads linking to various districts that were initially closed have since reopened; however, some roads to districts in Badakhshan, Nooristan, Daikundi, Bamyan and Paktika are still closed. IOM RESPONSE Northeast Region Badakhshan: At least 83 families were affected by avalanches triggered by heavy snowfall in Maimai district on 3 February 2017, with 15 persons killed and 27 wounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Aid Afghanistan Education Assessment of Learning Outcomes
    AID AFGHANISTAN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES FINAL REPORT Submitted by Stephen McLaughlin, Ed.D. Consultant to The Asia Foundation-Afghanistan September 24, 2011 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 6 Assessment Approach and Methods 6 Extent to which the AAE Mission is Fulfilled by AAE Schools 7 Extent to which the AAE Learning Environment Yields Effective Results 9 The Extent to which AAE Education is Cost-Effective 17 Future Issues and Opportunities for AAE Schools 18 Conclusion 21 Recommendations 22 Appendices 23 3 Executive Summary This assessment applies to theAid Afghanistan Education Program (AAE)portion of the project Strengthening Education in Afghanistan, funded under a cooperative agreement between The Asia Foundation and USAID Afghanistan. It assesses the programmatic impact of AAE’s schools for mostly female disadvantaged students, which is defined by research questions relating to: the (1) current and future need for AAE schools’ services; (2) extent that AAE schools create a learning environment that produces effective results; (3) extent that AAE-delivered education is commensurate with government-school education; and (4) cost-effectiveness of AAE schools. The AAE Program consists of 13 schools with combined primary and secondary grade levels currently located in Kabul and eight other provinces, mostly, in the North: Badakhshan, Balkh, Bamyan, Ghazni, Jazjan, Parwan, Samangan, and Serepul.All but one school, in Jazjan Province with 114 boys, enrolls girls and young women who have been unable to begin or complete their education in government schools. Total AAE enrollment is 3,500, while the most recent total of actively attending students is 2,786.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Atlas Part IV
    PART IV 99 DESCRIPTION PART IV OF WATERSHEDS I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED II. AMU DARYA RIVER BASIN III. NORTHERN RIVER BASIN IV. HARIROD-MURGHAB RIVER BASIN V. HILMAND RIVER BASIN VI. KABUL (INDUS) RIVER BASIN VII. NON-DRAINAGE AREAS PICTURE 84 Aerial view of Panjshir Valley in Spring 2003. Parwan, 25 March 2003 100 I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED Part IV of the Watershed Atlas describes the 41 watersheds Graphs 21-32 illustrate the main characteristics on area, popu- defined in Afghanistan, which includes five non-drainage areas lation and landcover of each watershed. Graph 21 shows that (Map 10 and 11). For each watershed, statistics on landcover the Upper Hilmand is the largest watershed in Afghanistan, are presented. These statistics were calculated based on the covering 46,882 sq. km, while the smallest watershed is the FAO 1990/93 landcover maps (Shapefiles), using Arc-View 3.2 Dasht-i Nawur, which covers 1,618 sq. km. Graph 22 shows that software. Graphs on monthly average river discharge curve the largest number of settlements is found in the Upper (long-term average and 1978) are also presented. The data Hilmand watershed. However, Graph 23 shows that the largest source for the hydrological graph is the Hydrological Year Books number of people is found in the Kabul, Sardih wa Ghazni, of the Government of Afghanistan – Ministry of Irrigation, Ghorband wa Panjshir (Shomali plain) and Balkhab watersheds. Water Resources and Environment (MIWRE). The data have Graph 24 shows that the highest population density by far is in been entered by Asian Development Bank and kindly made Kabul watershed, with 276 inhabitants/sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    global witness “We are at risk of the curse of plenty, [the] curse of resources.” Ashraf Ghani, President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan1 “The mine belongs to the whole nation. It is for all of us.” ‘Haji Anwar’, a miner from Badakhshan2 “This mine is itself a general (…) It will make people fight.” ‘Haji Bashir’, an elder from the district of Kuran wa Munjan3 WAR IN THE TREASURY OF THE PEOPLE | JUNE 2016 3 70°30'0"E 71°0'0"E Kokcha River Faizabad District Arghanjkhwa R Faizabad District RAryan Baharak RArgo Shuhada Argo District Baharak District N N " " 0 0 ' District R ' 0 M 0 ° Khash ° 7 7 3 R 3 Deodarra n a l h Ì M Pul e Ali Mughul g Darayem a Teshkan R Khash B R Darayem Jurm & District Keb z R ( u District d n u Keshem K R a i v l Warduj u Pul e Such M b Teshkan a Keshem Firgamiru Jurm District K District ( District Ob e Roghak M District Teer Garan Khostak valley R Ob e Khestak M Ob e Djokham M Yamgan N N " M R " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 3 Tagab 3 ° ° 6 Mir Kan Kokcha River 6 3 R District Yamgan 3 District B a d a k h s h a n Zebak B a d a k h s h a n District Farkhar P r o v ii n c e District Robat e Bolo ( Jangalak block Sar e Sang Junduk and Petawuk M Ì block T a k h a r P r o v ii n c e ( Lajwardshoh Ì Chelemuk block Warsaj PAKISTAN Kuran wa Munjan Chitral District District Skazer( N R N " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 ° ° 6 6 3 3 ( Anjuman Kuran wa Munjan Anjuman Pass District N u r ii s tt a n P a n jj s h ii r P r o v ii n c e Barg e Matal r e P r o v ii n c e h s District j n a P a i Paryan District v l Mandol District u b a K 70°30'0"E 71°0'0"E Legend 0 10 20 30 40 50 Km M Checkpoints/incidents (2014) Primary road network ° Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 Ì Mining sites Major rivers/water R District Center Rivers/streams Date Created: 27 April 2015 Data Source(s): ( Town/village mentioned in text Provincial boundaries UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA), Lajwardeen contract concession blocks District boundaries AGCHO, CSO, AIMS, MISTI.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics
    Government of Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Afghanistan Opium Survey 2010 Summary Findings September 2010 ABBREVIATIONS AGE Anti-government Elements ANP Afghan National Police CNPA Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan GLE Governor-led eradication ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) ISAF International Security Assistance Force MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the 2009 Afghanistan Opium Survey and to the preparation of this report: Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Mohammad Ibrahim Azhar (Deputy Minister), Mohammad Zafar (Deputy Minister), Ahmad Haroon Shirzad (Director General), Policy &Coordination, Mir Abdullah (Deputy Director of Survey and Monitoring Directorate), Saraj Ahmad (Deputy Director of Survey and Monitoring Directorate). Survey Coordinators: Eshaq Masumi (Central Region), Abdul Mateen (Eastern Region), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Western Region), Fida Mohammad (Northern Region), Mohammed Ishaq Anderabi (North- Eastern Region), Khalil Ahmad (Southern Region), Khiali Jan Mangal (Eradication Verification Reporter), Mohammad Khyber Wardak (Database officer), Mohammad Sadiq Rizaee (Remote Sensing), Shiraz Khan Hadawe (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), Mohammad Ajmal (Data entry), Sahar (Data entry), Mohammad Hakim Hayat (Data entry). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Kabul) Jean-Luc Lemahieu (Country Representative), Ashita Mittal (Deputy Representative, Programme), Devashish Dhar (International Project Coordinator), Ziauddin Zaki (National Project Coordinator), Abdul Mannan Ahmadzai (Survey Officer), Noor Mohammad Sadiq (Database Developer) Remote sensing analysts: Ahmad Jawid Ghiasee and Sayed Sadat Mehdi Eradication reporters: Ramin Sobhi and Zia Ulhaq.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Assistance Programme (HAP) Weekly Summary Report
    Humanitarian Assistance Programme (HAP) Weekly Summary Report “On New Responses to Natural Disasters and Follow-up” Reporting Period: 7 February 2013 – 13 February 2013 Donor: OFDA/USAID Submission Date: 13 February 2013 Incidents Update: During the reporting period three natural disaster incidents were reported. Central Region: • Parwan Province: On the 3rd of February, ANDMA reported 44 families affected by heavy rainfall in four districts of Parwan province: Sayd Khel, Bagram, Chaharikar, Surkh Parsa. One person was injured and three persons caught in an avalanche did not survive the incident in Shekh Ali district, Dara Botyan village. Consequently, the joint assessment conducted by IOM, ANDMA, CARE, ARCS, and DoRR on the 6th of February identified 27 families for immediate assistance (nine houses destroyed, 18 houses severely damaged). IOM provided winter warm clothing and blankets to these 27 families, while CARE provided nine tents and ANDMA assisted with food items. A separate assessment carried out by ANDMA recommended additional 22 families for assistance. UNICEF committed to assist 22 families with NFIs and hygiene kits. • Logar Province: On the 5th of February, ANDMA and IRC reported heavy snowfall and harsh winter affecting around 15 families in Kharwar district. Six casualties, including those of two children were also reported. Families in other districts of the province were also severely affected. In response, IOM and IRC conducted an assessment in six districts: Baraki Barak, Kharwar, Khoshi, Pul-e-Alam, Mohammad Agha and center, on the 10th of February. 152 families were confirmed for an assistance (houses severely damaged). IOM will provide winter warm clothing to all families, while IRC will provide tarpaulins, in addition to 27 latrine kits and kitchen sets to female headed families.
    [Show full text]