DOCSLIB.ORG

System Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
System Overview Transit Strategic Plan Greater Lynchburg Transit Company FISCAL YEARS 2019-2028 MAY 2020 FINAL Prepared By: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Overview of Greater Lynchburg Transit Company Services and Strategic Vision ................................................ 1-1 1.1. System Overview ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2. Strategic Vision .............................................................................................................................. 1-3 2. System Performance and Operations Analysis .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1. System and Service Data.................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2. Evaluation of Transit Market Demand and Underserved Areas ............................................................ 2-16 2.3. Performance Evaluation ................................................................................................................ 2-33 2.4. Operating and Network Efficiency Evaluation ................................................................................... 2-40 2.5. Analysis of Opportunities to Collaborate with Other Transit Providers .................................................. 2-46 3. Planned Improvements and Modifications ................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1. Planned Service Improvements......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2. Prioritization of Planned Service Improvements ................................................................................ 3-33 3.3. Service Development .................................................................................................................... 3-34 3.4. Unconstrained Improvements ........................................................................................................ 3-38 4. Implementation Plan ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1. Asset Management ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2. Capital Implementation ................................................................................................................... 4-2 5. Financial Plan............................................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1. Operating and Maintenance Costs and Funding Sources....................................................................... 5-1 5.2. Bus Purchase Costs and Funding Sources ........................................................................................... 5-8 5.3. Facility Improvement and Other Capital Costs and Funding Sources ....................................................... 5-8 5.4. Potential New Sources for Additional Revenue ................................................................................. 5-11 ii GREATER LYNCHBURG TRANSIT COMPANY: FISCAL YEAR 2019-2028 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: GLTC Bus Routes ............................................................................................................................ 1-2 Figure 2-1: 2016 Population Density ................................................................................................................. 2-3 Figure 2-2: 2015 Employment Density ............................................................................................................... 2-4 Figure 2-3: City of Lynchburg Future Land Use Designations ................................................................................. 2-5 Figure 2-4: Monthly Ridership .......................................................................................................................... 2-6 Figure 2-5: City Routes and Paratransit Monthly Ridership ................................................................................... 2-7 Figure 2-6: Peak Vehicle Requirements............................................................................................................ 2-10 Figure 2-7: What could GLTC do to encourage you to ride the bus more often?..................................................... 2-12 Figure 2-8: What could GLTC do to attract you to use public transit? ................................................................... 2-13 Figure 2-9: Priorities for Frequent Riders ......................................................................................................... 2-14 Figure 2-10: Priorities for Non-Riders .............................................................................................................. 2-15 Figure 2-11: Existing Activity Density ............................................................................................................... 2-18 Figure 2-12: Year 2028 Employment ............................................................................................................... 2-19 Figure 2-13: Year 2028 Population .................................................................................................................. 2-20 Figure 2-14: Year 2028 Population Growth....................................................................................................... 2-21 Figure 2-15: 2013-2017 American Community Survey Population 65 Years and Older ............................................ 2-23 Figure 2-16: 2013-2017 American Community Survey Minority Populations ......................................................... 2-24 Figure 2-17: 2013-2017 American Community Survey Populations with Low English Proficiency .............................. 2-25 Figure 2-18: 2013-2017 American Community Survey Households Experiencing Poverty ........................................ 2-26 Figure 2-19: 2013-2017 American Community Survey Populations with Disabilities ............................................... 2-27 Figure 2-20: Frequent Trips by Bus.................................................................................................................. 2-29 Figure 2-21: Frequent Trips by Other Modes that Could Potentially be Served by Bus ............................................ 2-31 Figure 2-22: Ridership Trend Analysis .............................................................................................................. 2-33 Figure 2-23: Net Cost Per Passenger Trend Analysis........................................................................................... 2-34 Figure 2-24: Fare Box Recovery Ratio Trend Analysis ......................................................................................... 2-35 Figure 2-25: Passengers Per Revenue Hour Trend Analysis ................................................................................. 2-35 Figure 2-26: Passengers Per Revenue Mile Trend Analysis .................................................................................. 2-36 Figure 2-27: Population Density within 1/4 Mile of Transit ................................................................................. 2-37 Figure 2-28: Employment Density within 1/4 Mile of Transit ............................................................................... 2-38 Figure 2-29: Fixed Route Weekday Average Daily Ridership by Time of Day .......................................................... 2-43 Figure 2-30: Fixed Route Weekend Average Daily Ridership by Time of Day .......................................................... 2-43 Figure 2-31: Paratransit Weekday Average Daily Ridership by Time of Day ........................................................... 2-44 Figure 2-32: Paratransit Weekend Average Daily Ridership by Time of Day ........................................................... 2-44 Figure 2-33: Weekday Average Fixed Route Speeds by Time of Day ..................................................................... 2-46 Figure 3-1: Alignment of Existing Routes 1A and 1B and Proposed Routes 1A and 1B ............................................... 3-2 Figure 3-2: Alignment of Existing Route 2 and Proposed Route 2A and Route 2B ..................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-3: Alignment of Existing Route 3A and Proposed Route 3A ....................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3-4: Alignment of Existing Route 3B and Proposed Route 3B ....................................................................... 3-7 Figure 3-5: Alignment of Existing Route 4A/4B and Proposed Route 4 .................................................................... 3-9 Figure 3-6: Alignment of Proposed Route 11 .................................................................................................... 3-11 Figure 3-7: Alignment of Existing Route 6 and Proposed Route 6 ......................................................................... 3-12 Figure 3-8: Alignment of Existing Route 6/7 and Proposed Route 10 .................................................................... 3-14 iii GREATER LYNCHBURG TRANSIT COMPANY: FISCAL YEAR 2019-2028 Figure 3-9: Alignment of Existing Route 7 and Proposed Route 7 ......................................................................... 3-15 Figure 3-10: Alignment of Existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Series 2013 a and B OS (PDF)
    NEW ISSUEBOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Fitch: AA+ Standard & Poor's: AA (see "RATINGS" herein) In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, New York, New York, Bond Counsel to the City, under existing statutes and court decisions and assuming continuing compliance with certain tax covenants described herein, interest on the Series 2013A Bonds (i) is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code') and (ii) is not treated as a preference item in calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations under the Code; such interest, however, is included in the adjusted current earnings of certain corporations for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on such corporations. See " TAX MATTERS Series 2013A Bonds In the opinion of Bond Counsel to the City, interest on the Series 2013B Bonds is included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. See "TAXMAITEPS - Series 2013B Bonds In the opinion of Bond Counsel to the City, under existing statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia, interest on the Bonds is not includable in computing the Virginia income tax. $24,580,000 $15,350,000 City of Roanoke, Virginia, City of Roanoke, Virginia, General Obligation Public Taxable General Obligation , Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Public Improvement ROANOKE Series 2013A Refunding Bonds, (Tax-Exempt) Series 2013B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As Shown On Inside Cover This Official Statement has been prepared by the City of Roanoke to provide information on the above-referenced Series 2013A Bonds and Series 2013B Bonds (collectively, the "Bonds").
    [Show full text]
  • SMART BUS to RAIL CONNECTOR SERVICE Daily Bus Service Connects
    Dec. 2013 SMART BUS to RAIL CONNECTOR SERVICE Daily bus service connects the Roanoke Civil Center and The Bedford Welcome Center (816 Burks Hill Road at the intersection of Routes 460 & 122) Bedford, VA 24523; www.visitbedford.com), to the AMTRAK Station in Lynchburg. Cost is four dollars ($4) each way and you need to have correct change since drivers carry no cash. This service is designed to serve the Northeast Regional Train Service, NOT The Crescent, so keep this in mind when making AMTRAK reservations. Service Design: Via Route U.S. 460 originates from the Roanoke Civic Center (LOT - C) in Roanoke to the Kemper Street Station in Lynchburg with one intermediary stop in Bedford at the Bedford Area Welcome Center. Passengers are able to connect with Greyhound bus service in Lynchburg; Valley Metro routes; Greater Lynchburg Transit Company routes; and Amtrak Northeast Regional train service. There is additional service that continues west to Virginia Tech Fridays through Sundays. Check the website for this schedule as well as any updates to this schedule: www.smartwaybus.com or www.valleymetro.com. Please plan to arrive at least ten minutes in advance of schedule times. The Smart Way Bus to Rail Inter-City Connector (Weekend schedule is on the reverse side) WEEKDAYS Morning Route Schedule DEPART ARRIVE DEPART ARRIVE DEPART ARRIVE DEPART ARRIVE ROANOKE BEDFORD BEDFORD LYNCHBURG LYNCHBURG BEDFORD BEDFORD ROANOKE M onday- Monday- Friday: Monday- Monday- Friday: Monday- Friday: Monday- Fri: Monday- 8:45 am Friday: 5:50 am 6:30am Friday:6:35am 7:15 am 7:20 am 7:55 am Friday: 8:00 Mondays-Fridays EVENING Route Schedule DEPART ARRIVE BEDFORD LYNCHBURG 8:20 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    Kemper Street Industrial Historic District City of Lynchburg, Virginia 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) Category of Property (Check only one box) X private ___ building(s) ___ public-local _x_ district ___ public-State ___ site ___ public-Federal ___ structure ___ object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing __5__ __0__ buildings __0__ __0__ sites __1__ __0__ structures __0__ __0__ objects __6__ __0__ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register __0__ Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) ___n/a____ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: INDUSTRY Sub: Manufacturing Facility INDUSTRY Industrial Storage DOMESTIC Institutional Housing TRANSPORTATION Rail-related Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: INDUSTRY Sub: Industrial Storage TRADE Specialty Store WORK IN PROGESS VACANT TRANSPORTATION Rail-related 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Georgian Revival 20th Century Industrial Vernacular Art Deco Materials (Enter categories from instructions) Foundation Concrete roof Built-up walls Brick, Concrete/Stucco other n/a Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Kemper Street Industrial Historic District City of Lynchburg, Virginia 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing) X A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. ____ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.
    [Show full text]
  • Traveling In, Out, and Around the Roanoke Area
    TTravelingraveling IIn,n, OOut,ut, aandnd AAroundround FREE TThehe RRoanokeoanoke AArearea June 2013 People who are hearing impaired may call Virginia Relay at 711 to contact agencies directly for more information and to make reservations. We Wish You Safe Travels Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission 313 Luck Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24016 (540) 343-4417 www.rvarc.org RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES BICYCLE RENTAL SERVICES Amtrak www.amtrak.com 1-800-872-7245 River Greenway Bicycle Rental Wasena Park [email protected] Every day three trains depart the Lynchburg Kemper Street Station. Connecting bus service to Roanoke and Blacksburg is provided by Cyclo+Ward [email protected] 540-344-1499 Corner of Jefferson Street and Franklin Road, Downtown Roanoke the Smart Way Connector bus in coordination with the Northeast Regional train’s arrival and departure times. UnderDog Bikes [email protected] 540-204-4276 1113 Piedmont Street SE, Roanoke The ͞EŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚZĞŐŝŽŶĂů͟ƚƌĂŝŶ originates in Lynchburg every morning, heads north, and every evening a train returns. The LIMOUSINE AND TOWN CAR SERVICES “Northeast Regional” train travels between the following stations: 540-345-7710 x Boston, MA – x Newark, NJ – x Newark, DE Roanoke Airport South Station Penn Station x Aberdeen, MD Transportation Service www.roanokeats.com x Boston, MA – x Newark, NJ – x Baltimore, MD – Roanoke Airport Transportation Service provides service to the Back Bay Airport Penn Station Roanoke Regional Airport and surrounding areas with town cars x Westwood, MA – x Iselin, NJ – x BWI Airport, MD – and vans. A town car to Downtown Roanoke is $17 for up to three Route 128 Metropark BWI Thurgood people, and a van trip for up to 10 people with luggage or 15 x Providence, RI x New Brunswick, NJ Marshall Airport people without luggage is $48.
    [Show full text]
  • NARP News National Association of Railroad Passengers February 2012
    NARP News National Association of Railroad Passengers February 2012 www.narprail.org Trains: A Travel Choice Americans Want House Transportation Bill Threatens Transit, PTC, Cal. HSR The “American Energy and Infra- be once the $40 billion runs out. NARP, Partners Back structure Jobs Act” (H.R. 7), passed by The T&I committee, on a party-line Gov. Brown’s HSR the House Transportation & Infrastruc- 15-22 vote, rejected Rep. Earl Blume- Commitment ture (T&I) Committee early Feb. 3, is nauer’s (D-OR) amendment in opposi- a fi ve-year mostly-highway reauthori- tion to this unfortunate proposal. In a joint letter, NARP, Californians for High-Speed Rail and the Midwest zation. The House Ways and Means Also on a party-line vote, 22-17, High-Speed Rail Association praised Committee approved the revenue pro- the Committee adopted an amendment Gov. Jerry Brown’s (D) continuing visions, also Feb. 3. (www.bit.ly/denhamhsr) by Rep. Jeff commitment to high speed rail. The NARP and the U.S. Chamber of Denham (R-CA), making any Califor- groups urged Brown to move forward Commerce are among 600 organiza- nia high-speed rail project ineligible with construction of the fi rst segment tions that signed a Transportation for for the bill’s funds. between Merced and Bakersfi eld. America letter opposing the troubling The bill extends by fi ve years, to transit provisions. The letter comes after a Jan. 18 State Dec. 31, 2020, the deadline by which of the State Address in which Brown Transit—including commuter rail— most lines carrying passengers must gave greater prominence to a passenger gets about 80% of its federal funds have Positive Train Control and elimi- train project than perhaps any governor from the Highway Trust Fund’s transit nates the requirement for hazmat lines in recent memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Strategies for State Sponsored Intercity and High Speed Passenger Rail [SJR 63 (2010)]
    REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Funding Strategies for State Sponsored Intercity and High Speed Passenger Rail [SJR 63 (2010)] TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA SENATE DOCUMENT NO. 14 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND 2010 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (804) 786-4440 THELMA D. DRAKE 600 EAST MAJN STREET, SUITE 2102 FAX (804) 225-3752 Director RICHMOND, VA 23219-2416 VIRGINIA RELAY CENTER 1-800-828-1120 (TDD) November 23,2010 The Honorable Robert F. McDonnell Governor ofVirginia Patrick HeillY Building, 3rd Floor 1111 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Honorable Yvonne B. Miller Chairman, Senate Transportation Committee General Assembly Building, Room 315 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Honorable Joe T. May Chairman, House Transportation Committee General Assembly Building P.O. Box 406 Richmond, Virginia 23218 Lady and Gentlemen: Attached for your review is the "Funding Strategies for State Sponsored Intercity and High Speed Passenger Rail" as requested by the 2010 General Assembly session in Senate Joint Resolution 63. This report is provided by the Virginia Department ofRail and Public Transportation on behalfofthe Secretary ofTransportation, and responds to the General Assembly's direction to: 1. Assess the most efficient and beneficial method by which high speed and intercity passenger rail operations should be funded. 11. Submit a report to the governor and the General Assembly communicating its findings and recommendations. Sincerely, Thelma D. Drake Director cc: Honorable Sean T. Connaughton, Secretary ofTransportation The Smartest Distance Between Two Points wilJW. drpt. virginia.gov Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation November 2010 Table of Contents Acronyms, and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................iii Executive Summary....................................................................................................................v 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction he City of Lynchburg lies at a significant crossroads of major traffic corridors within the State of Virginia. Nevertheless, it is the largest metropolitan area in the Commonwealth without interstate access. Primary highways to the City include US Route 29, US Route 460, and US Route 501. Historically, these traffic corridors have been focused on routing traffic through the City of Lynchburg rather than around it. Such traffic patterns and trends can have profound impacts, both positive and negative, on neighborhoods, access corridors and the economic viability of the City and the region. The City also has a long history of providing mass transit for its residents, beginning in the 1890s. Today, the Greater Lynchburg Transit Company provides bus service from a central hub at the Plaza Shopping Center. During the development of this plan, public input on transportation issues focused principally on certain specific aspects of the existing and projected transportation system; “gateway” issues related to the US Route 29 bypass and its effect on access to downtown and the City in general; isolated areas of congestion during high traffic periods; cut-through traffic at the neighborhood level; integration of various alternative transportation modes including rail, transit, bicycle and pedestrian; access to the City's historic and cultural resource using the various transportation modes and aesthetic design standards for roadway and other transportation improvements. The City recognizes the critical relationship between transportation and land use planning. The primary goal of this transportation element is to provide the citizens of Lynchburg with safe, efficient, effective and well planned development and redevelopment opportunities while preserving the integrity and character of the affected neighborhoods, historic districts and natural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Commending Garland Harper ​ ​ WHEREAS, Garland Harper Retired on July 24, 2020, After Diligently Working for 45 Years As an Amtrak Station Agent; And
    Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940 Agenda item # New Business RESOLUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD September 16, 2020 MOTION Made By: , Seconded By: ​ Mr. Dodson ​ ​ Mr. Rucker Action: Motion Carried, Unanimously Title: Commending Garland Harper ​ ​ WHEREAS, Garland Harper retired on July 24, 2020, after diligently working for 45 years as an Amtrak station agent; and WHEREAS, Mr. Harper’s passion for the railroad began when he was a child, watching the trains as they passed by along the James River in Lynchburg, with that passion continuing during his time as an undergraduate at the College of William and Mary, where it was his ritual to watch the trains pulling through the Williamsburg station each evening; and WHEREAS, Mr. Harper fulfilled his dream of working for the railroad after graduating from the College of William & Mary in 1975, when he took his first job as a station agent in Williamson, West Virginia, when the Chicago-Norfolk Mountaineer began service; and ​ ​ WHEREAS, shortly thereafter, Mr. Harper returned to Lynchburg, the Hill City, at first ​ dividing his time between Lynchburg and Charlottesville to tend to passengers traveling on the New Orleans-New York City Crescent and eventually dedicating his time and services in ​ Lynchburg to passengers traveling on both the Crescent and then the Lynchburg-Boston ​ ​ Northeast Regional that launched in 2009 and was extended to Roanoke in 2017; and ​ WHEREAS, Mr. Harper’s service to Amtrak and the Commonwealth extended for decades and touched millions, as he welcomed residents home and assisted strangers finding their way; and WHEREAS, before the crack of dawn on a snowy January morning in 1993, as the ​ Crescent arrived at the Kemper Street Station, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, July 11, 2012. 6:00 P.M. Charley's Restaurant. 707 Graves
    Vol. 20 July 2012 No.7 From the iron ore region of Minnesota, across the high plains of Montana, to the Cascade Mountains of Washington, the Great Northern Railway of the 50’s and 60’s will be the subject of Fred Mayer’s program for the July meeting of the Blue Ridge Chapter, NRHS. Shown above is GN 2505, a Class P2 4-8-2, which once pulled the Oriental Limited and the Empire Builder, in 1955 finishing out her life in freight service. Wednesday, July 11, 2012. 6:00 p.m. Charley’s Restaurant. 707 Graves Mill Rd. Lynchburg, VA Blue Ridge Chapter, National Railway Historical Society Minutes of Meeting June 13, 2012 President Rick Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. at Charley’s Restaurant and welcomed 27 members and 5 guests. The May minutes were approved as distributed and then treasurer John Tanner made his report. Rick reported that Chuck Haldik was in the hospital again. Ed Fielding announced that he and Skip Hansberry would give the VBR program on Sunday at the Massie Mill Ruritan Club for the Nelson County Historical Society and again on Monday at Hull Street Station in Richmond for the Old Dominion Chapter. Ed also asked members to consider helping the Old Dominion Chapter with their Buckingham Branch excursions in the fall; they need manpower. Lee Hawkins spoke briefly about the Manassas trip on August 25. Charlie Long updated members on the N&WHS Annual Meeting in Lynchburg. Skip Hansberry reported that Kenny Kennier told him work would begin on the Amherst Station project shortly and also said that his friend George Hamlin, who has done several programs for the chapter in the past, had just published a new book on trains in the Chicago area.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Conditions Existing Transportation Elements
    3 Chapter 3: Existing Conditions Existing Transportation Elements ...................................................................................................24 Roadway .........................................................................................................................................24 Non-Motorized Travel .................................................................................................................27 Transit .............................................................................................................................................28 Passenger Rail and Bus .................................................................................................................29 Coordinate Human Services Mobility Plan ..............................................................................29 Aviation ..........................................................................................................................................30 Freight ............................................................................................................................................31 Distribution Centers .....................................................................................................................31 Population Demographics ...............................................................................................................33 Expected Population Growth .....................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Funding Strategies for State Sponsored Intercity and High
    REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Funding Strategies for State Sponsored Intercity and High Speed Passenger Rail TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA SENATE DOCUMENT NO. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND 2010 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation November 2010 Table of Contents Acronyms, and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................iii Executive Summary....................................................................................................................v 1. Introduction and Purpose ..................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose.........................................................................................................................3 2. Passenger Rail in Virginia ..................................................................................................4 2.1 Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail Service .......................................................................4 2.1.1 Amtrak Regional Service.......................................................................................5 2.1.2 Amtrak Intercity/Long Distance Routes .................................................................8 2.1.3 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Service........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Station Needs Assessment
    Virginia Station Needs Assessment DRPT initiated a study to identify the condition and needs at Virginia’s Amtrak stations. Study goals and objectives • Identify state of good repair (SGR) needs, capacity needs, and associated costs • Provide local station stakeholders with the data to inform capital spending decisions regarding improvements • Secure a dedicated funding source for strategic statewide coordination of improvements • Provide amenities, features, and services to enable a consistent Amtrak customer experience throughout Virginia Alexandria Station looking west. State of Good Repair Needs A State of Good Repair Need is a feature that is rated as “poor” or “marginal” as per the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM). Capacity Needs A Capacity Need is a feature or addition that is required to accommodate the expected number of passengers and employees according to the Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines. Note: Study did not include Lorton Auto Train Station. Auto Train is a separate business line under Amtrak and DRPT has limited control or influence over the Auto Train station and infrastructure. Virginia Station Needs Assessment, 2019 Study Overview Page 1 Study process The study involved: • Performing assessments of existing conditions on day of visit at all Virginia Amtrak stations except Lorton Auto Train • Developing an inventory of station subcomponents including detailed condition information • Identifying subcomponents not in a SGR • Reviewing Amtrak Station Program
    [Show full text]