SPEEDLINES, High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Committee, June

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SPEEDLINES, High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Committee, June SECTION NAME 1 Celebrate the past, Design the future. HIGSPEEDLINESH-SPEED INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL JUNE 2015 ISSUE #15 2 Celebrate the past, Design the future. CONTENTS SPEEDLINES MAGAZINE 3 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER 5 STATION REDEVELOPMENT 8 IN THE SPOTLIGHT 9 PRIVATE SECTOR INNOVATION 10 ACE MOVES FORWARD 13 NEW POLICY APPROACHES 15 PASSENGER RAIL SUMMIT » p. 24 17 PRIIA 212 On the front cover: 19 LEGISLATIVE NEWS UIC along with East Japan Railway Company is co-organising 9th World Congress on High-Speed 21 SHINKHANSEN Rail “UIC HIGHSPEED 2015”. It is the largest international congress and exhibition devoted to High-Speed Rail in the world, which has 23 NEC FUTURE been initiated by UIC and gathered up to 2,000 professionals once every few years since 1992, will finally come back to the birth place of High- 25 TRAIN FUN FACTS Speed Rail, Japan. 27 COMPETITIVE TRIP TIMES CHAIR: PETER GERTLER VICE CHAIR: AL ENGEL SECRETARY: ANNA BARRY OFFICER AT LARGE: DAVID CAMERON IMMEDIATE PAST-CHAIR: DAVID KUTROSKY EDITOR: WENDY WENNER PUBLISHER: AL ENGEL ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: KENNETH SISLAK LAYOUT DESIGNER: WENDY WENNER © 2011-2015 APTA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPEEDLINES is published in cooperation with: American Public Transportation Association 1666 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE 3 Dear HS&IPR Committee and Friends: It’s been a year since my appointment to Chair of APTA’s High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail APTA Rail Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah. At our Committee meeting we will review progress madeCommittee this year (HS&IPR). on several We haveareas had including a challenging, developing busy a but,new fulfilling Vision and year Mission culminating for the in Committee; the Annual Legislative and Advocacy activities and the Committee led and sponsored Return on Investment Study. At this year’s Rail Conference, the HS&IPR Committee will be sponsoring two exciting sessions that I hope you will be able to attend. At the session on International Success Stories you will hear about the exciting projects underway in California, the Northeast Corridor and from around the world. At the session on High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Corridors, you will hear about progress being made along other intercity corridors in Michigan, Texas, and the North East Maglev. As will be dis- cussed at these sessions, we have made great progress and we have a lot to be proud of and much to look forward in the advancement of high-speed and intercity passenger rail in North America. Many challenges lie ahead; however, including long-term and sustainable funding for passenger rail. While APTA and our committee have been active in working with Congress and the Administration to demonstrate the value of passenger rail and to work toward a bi-partisan effort to secure funding for future programs and projects, there is much to be done. I am also excited about our current edition of “Speedlines” which contains several informative arti- cles covering international and national current topics such as, a review of Japan’s highly successful Shinkansen Business Model; prospects for a national intercity passenger rail policy; legislative report on the state of high-speed and intercity rail; and reports from California and other statewide programs. We also carry the views of various professionals active in the legislative policy arena. Take note that at times these views do not coincide with the position or opinion of this publication or APTA’s posi- tion on an issue. We think it is important at times for you to know what others are thinking. I am looking forward to another fantastic Rail Conference this year and hope to see you all in Salt Lake City. Sincerely, CHAIRMANPeter Gertler APTA High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Committee The 2015 Rail Conference is scheduled for June 21-24, 2015, at the Grand America Hotel in Salt Lake City, UT. SPEEDLINES | March 2015 » p. 22 3 Natum vere numenis simus, od qui beribus siti con plautem 5 STATION REDEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTING TO RAIL PASSENGER GROWTH Contributed by Eric Peterson As intercity and commuter rail ridership continue to Washington, DC’s Union Station, Denver’s Union Station, grow across the United States, much credit can be given and the proposed Moynihan Station in New York City are to rail station rehabilitation and redevelopment initia- among the more widely known examples of passenger tives for making passenger rail a more attractive trans- rail station redevelopment, but there are dozens of other portation alternative. cities, small and large, where the rehabilitation and/or rede- velopment of rail station property has boosted the eco- Whether it’s a project completed a few years ago, or a nomic vitality of the neighborhood around the station and project just in the planning stage, the excitement and helped attract new ridership for intercity and commuter foresight reflected in station preservation and redevel- rail providers. opment is providing a broad array of benefits for local economies and for the bottom lines of passenger rail Included in this mix of towns and cities are places like service providers. Lynchburg and Richmond, Virginia; communities along and adjacent to the Northeast Corridor; communities through- Encouraged by local leaders and supported with federal, out the spokes that reach to the Chicago hub; and, destina- state, and local grants and guidance, many communities tions all along the West Coast from San Diego all the way across the nation have launched or are in the process of north to Seattle. launching initiatives that create new value and distinc- tion to rail station properties that once were the cor- In each of these areas there are examples of recently nerstones of a robust transportation system, but over redeveloped and rehabilitated stations that have expe- time either lost their luster, or were forgotten altogether. rienced strong ridership improvements and significant Built in the Central Platte Valley at a cost of $525,000, A lower downtown Denver landmark, Union Station was Union Depot, as it was first known, opened June 1, 1881, recently renovated to serve as a regional transit hub and during the era when Colorado and the rest of the West the center of a new mixed-use neighborhood. was undergoing rapid industrialization through coal pro- duction and transcontinental railroad expansion. SPEEDLINES | June 2015 STATION REDEVELOPMENT 6 Richmond, Virginia, circa 1905. "Main Street Station." The clock tower will be familiar to trav- elers on I-95 where it pokes up over the ele- vated portion of expressway downtown. Richmond, Virginia’s Main Street Station is located in the Shockhoe Bottom district. It is a National Historic Landmark, and is a vital connection between this southern capital and the greater Northeast Corridor. Originally opened to serve as a union station for two major railroads, the Seaboard Air Line (SAL) Railroad, running north and south, and the Chesapeake and Ohio (C&O) Railroad, running east and west, the headhouse building and train shed were originally designed by Wilson, Harris, & Richards, three famous railroad terminal specialists from Philadelphia, prior to the Spanish-American War, in 1898. improvements in economic activity surrounding the Located at greatamericanstations.com, this on-line stations. toolbox provides community leaders a complete guide to launching, maintaining and succeeding in their efforts On the East Coast, Richmond, Virginia’s Main Street Station to restore their passenger rail depots. and Lynchburg, Virginia’s Kemper Street Station are stand- outs that show great passenger train ridership growth and Noting that, “approximately one-third of the more than tremendous contributions to the economic vitality of the 500 stations served by Amtrak are listed on the National areas around the two stations. Register of Historic Places, either individually or as con- tributing structures to historic districts,” and that, “many of Recognizing the relationship between local economic these same stations are also listed on state and local his- impact and the potential for growing passenger rail rid- toric registers” the Great American Stations website sug- ership, Amtrak has launched the Great American Stations gests that, “historic designation can be a powerful tool for program, a resource center that supports local initiatives a community contemplating the renovation or adaptive that seek to retain, repurpose, and rehabilitate their train reuse of a station.” stations. Amtrak, LIRR, and NJ TRANSIT are considering architectural improve- Amtrak ‘s expansion of New York Penn Station’s track and platform facili- ments to the existing New York Penn Station. The three agencies are ties will increase capacity in New York with the proposed Gateway Program. currently completing a Penn Station master plan that could guide aes- Plans under consideration include the construction of four new platforms thetic and layout improvements aimed at upgrading and expanding and seven new tracks to accommodate the additional intercity and com- the passenger waiting areas, creating new retail options, and making muter services that would be made possible with new Hudson River it easier to board trains and move through the station. tunneling. SPEEDLINES | June 2015 STATION REDEVELOPMENT 7 The Great American Stations website observes that, “while a train station’s primary purpose is to provide a point from which to depart or arrive, communities that fail to see their station’s full potential are missing a tremendous opportunity.” “Transforming a station into a place worth visiting, with shops, restaurants, museums and the like, enables towns to take advantage of the variety of people passing through every day by giving them something more – a reason to return. Additionally, if a station is more than a travel hub, locals will see the station as a place to relax and be enter- tained as well.” In 1903, Daniel H. Burnham, Principal Architect of the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair, was chosen to design Union Station.
Recommended publications
  • Appointment As Senior Responsible Owner for the Crossrail Project
    From the Permanent Secretary From the Chief Executive Department for Transport Infrastructure and Projects Authority 33 Horseferry Road 1 Horse Guards Road London London SW1P 4DR SW1A 2HQ 28 April 2021 To: Matt Lodge Subject: Appointment as Senior Responsible Owner for the Crossrail Project We are pleased to confirm your reappointment as Senior Responsible Owner (SRO) of the Crossrail Project (“the Project”) which took effect from 01 October 2020. Prior to the governance transition to Transport for London (TfL) on 1 October 2020, you were the SRO from 7 December 2015 on an interim basis and from 3 March 2016 on a permanent basis. As SRO, you are directly accountable to Director General Rail Infrastructure Group, and the Department for Transport (DfT) Board, under the oversight of the Secretary of State. Given the recent changes made to the project governance and the delegation of delivery responsibilities to TfL, your overall time commitment to the project should be no less than 20%. This commitment will be combined with your wider management and leadership responsibilities within the Department and your other responsibilities as SRO of the Intercity Express Programme, the Great Western Route Modernisation programme, the Western Rail Link to Heathrow programme, the South Western Route Capacity programme and the Thameslink programme. Regular conversations with your Permanent Secretary and Directors General will take place to ensure an appropriate balance is maintained across your portfolio of activities and that you receive support as needed to carry out your responsibilities. This will take place as a minimum annually, but may be more frequent, with agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-041 Crosscountry Spanner Awards
    Press Release 04 December 2009 XC2009/041 (LW) CROSSCOUNTRY TOPS RAILWAY CHARTS It’s Gold and Silver for award-winning train operator CrossCountry has won two prestigious rail industry awards in recognition of its trains being one of the most improved and reliable fleets across Britain’s rail network. CrossCountry was awarded Gold and Silver at last week’s annual ‘Golden Spanner’ ceremony organised by industry magazine Modern Railways. The Golden Spanner went to the Class 221 Super Voyagers for taking first place in the ‘Modern DMU’ category as the most reliable fleet in its class. The Super Voyagers also took the Silver Spanner for being the most improved fleet thanks to reliability being up 118% on last year. The ‘Golden Spanner’ is an awards scheme aimed at promoting excellence in train maintenance within Britain. Sarah Kendall, Production Director at CrossCountry said: “We are extremely proud to win these nationally recognised awards. Since the start of our franchise in November 2007 the team at CrossCountry has worked very closely with Bombardier Transportation, our maintainer to take specific targeted steps to improve the reliability of our Voyager trains. Our focus now is to build on this significant progress and further improve our performance. Train reliability is vital for our customers and therefore of the highest priority for us.” All trains are ranked on the distance they cover between technical faults by the Association of Train Operating Companies’ (ATOC) National Fleet Reliability Improvement Programme. Using this league table (see below) CrossCountry’s Voyager trains outperformed all other intercity fleets across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling 5G for Rail
    Innovating for a connected rail future Enabling 5G for rail Funded by 5G Testbeds and Trials Programme The Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport’s (DCMS) 5G Testbeds and Trials programme is part of the government’s £740 million National Productivity Investment Fund (NPIF) activities, to support the next generation of digital infrastructure, including 5G and full fibre broadband. In November 2017, DCMS announced funding to create the 5G rail testbed at the Rail Innovation & Development Centre (RIDC) at Melton Mowbray in Leicestershire. This capability enhancement at RIDC Melton is currently being installed and once open in May 2019, will support trials and Alpha phase testing, as well as the preparation of technologies for early mainline rail Beta testing and infrastructure deployment. 5G opportunities in rail Passenger numbers have doubled in the last 20 years – Rail Technical Strategy much more than the current Capability Delivery Plan infrastructure was ever designed for. Railway infrastructure includes around 20,000 miles of track, 2,500+ stations, 6,000 level crossings, 30,000 bridges and viaducts and more. Passenger numbers are set to double again in the next 25 years. We can’t rely on more track to cater for this growth – engineering innovation and technology is the key to unlocking the railway, and in-turn GB productivity, for the 21st century. Click this image to access the Rail Technical Strategy Capability Delivery Plan. 2 When Network Rail considers how technology can help cater for this growth, it foresees two revolutionary intelligent initiatives: Delivering Revolutionary Initiatives in Rail Intelligent Operations Intelligent Infrastructure Increasing collection and exploitation of live operational Increasing environment and asset sensing to increase data to underpin operational enhancements.
    [Show full text]
  • Series 2013 a and B OS (PDF)
    NEW ISSUEBOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Fitch: AA+ Standard & Poor's: AA (see "RATINGS" herein) In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, New York, New York, Bond Counsel to the City, under existing statutes and court decisions and assuming continuing compliance with certain tax covenants described herein, interest on the Series 2013A Bonds (i) is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code') and (ii) is not treated as a preference item in calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations under the Code; such interest, however, is included in the adjusted current earnings of certain corporations for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on such corporations. See " TAX MATTERS Series 2013A Bonds In the opinion of Bond Counsel to the City, interest on the Series 2013B Bonds is included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. See "TAXMAITEPS - Series 2013B Bonds In the opinion of Bond Counsel to the City, under existing statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia, interest on the Bonds is not includable in computing the Virginia income tax. $24,580,000 $15,350,000 City of Roanoke, Virginia, City of Roanoke, Virginia, General Obligation Public Taxable General Obligation , Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Public Improvement ROANOKE Series 2013A Refunding Bonds, (Tax-Exempt) Series 2013B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As Shown On Inside Cover This Official Statement has been prepared by the City of Roanoke to provide information on the above-referenced Series 2013A Bonds and Series 2013B Bonds (collectively, the "Bonds").
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State
    Final Report July 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Washington State Joint Transportation Committee Our ref: 23685001 Final Report July 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Washington State Joint Transportation Committee 2201 Cooperative Way, Suite 606 Columbia Street NW, 600 Suite 105, Herndon, VA 20171 Olympia, WA 98504-0937 +1 (703) 788-6500 Click here to enter text. www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23685001 Steer has prepared this material for Washington State Joint Transportation Committee. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State | Final Report Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... i Overview ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Uk's Intercity Express Programme
    Asia Pacific Projects Update CASE STUDY: THE UK'S INTERCITY EXPRESS PROGRAMME bidder by the DfT in February 2009. The solution selected KEY CONTACT by DfT was the Hitachi Super Express Train (SET) initially to be built and assembled by Hitachi in Japan Colin Wilson with later SETs being assembled at a state-of-the-art new Partner and London Head of Projects facility to be constructed for the project at Newton T +44 20 7796 6206 Aycliffe in Darlington, UK. [email protected] IEP is the most significant rolling stock investment program in the UK for 30 years, creating 730 new jobs in PPP FINANCING TO REPLACE THE EXISTING the rail industry, 200 in construction and thousands more INTERCITY 125 AND 225 ROLLING STOCK ON in the supply chain. THE UK NETWORK Given the size of the overall program, the transaction has The Intercity Express Programme (IEP) is the UK been split into two: (i) an initial funding for the Great Department for Transport (DfT) program to replace the Western Mainline (GWML) fleet, which has now reached older intercity trains currently running on the rail network financial close; and (ii) a second financing for the East in mainland UK with new trains in a major public-private Coast Mainline (ECML) fleet for which a commercial partnership (PPP) project that is both the biggest privately close has been achieved, and for which financial close is financed rolling stock deal in history, anywhere in the targeted for 2014. world, and one of the largest, most ambitious and complex PPP projects to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Passenger Rail System
    Appendix 3 Intercity Passenger Rail System Introduction passenger rail system, including: The Pennsylvania Intercity Passenger and Freight Rail Plan provides a High-Speed Rail Corridors (110 mph and above) – Corridors under strategic framework for creating a 21st-century rail network. The Plan 500 miles with travel demand, population density, and congestion on visualizes the passenger and competing modes that warrant high-speed rail service. freight rail network in 2035 Regional Corridors (79 to 110 mph) – Corridors under 500 miles, with and offers strategies and frequent, reliable service competing successfully with auto and air objectives to achieve its vision. travel. The purpose of Appendix 3 is Long-Distance Service – Corridors greater than 500 miles that provide to provide background basic connectivity and a balanced national transportation system. information on existing passenger rail service in In a report to Congress, Vision for High-Speed Rail in America, dated April Pennsylvania with a 2009, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) provided the following concentration on existing definitions: intercity passenger rail service and performance. High-Speed Rail (HSR) and Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) HSR – Express. Frequent, express service between major population Intercity Rail Definitions centers 200 to 600 miles apart, with few intermediate stops.1 Top There are numerous interpretations of what constitutes “intercity speeds of at least 150 mph on completely grade-separated, dedicated passenger rail.” In a recent publication, Achieving the Vision: Intercity rights-of-way (with the possible exception of some shared track in Passenger Rail, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) urged Congress to enact a National Rail Policy that should address the development of a national intercity 1 Corridor lengths are approximate; slightly shorter or longer intercity services may still help meet strategic goals in a cost-effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Class 800/801 High-Speed Rolling Stock for UK Intercity Express Programme
    646 Hitachi Review Vol. 63 (2014), No. 10 Featured Articles Development of Class 800/801 High-speed Rolling Stock for UK Intercity Express Programme Andrew Rogers OVERVIEW: Hitachi was formally awarded a rolling stock manufacturing Chris Robinson and maintenance contract for the UK IEP project in July 2012 through Koji Agatsuma Agility Trains Ltd. Including additional orders, the contract covers the manufacture of a total of 866 cars and the provision of maintenance services Mitsuo Iwasaki for a period of 27.5 years. With a total value of 5.8 billion pounds, the IEP Satoru Inarida, Dr. Eng. is the largest project in the history of British railways, and is intended to Takahisa Yamamoto replace the aging rolling stock on the UK’s East Coast Main Line and Great Kenta Konishi Western Main Line, which run between London and other major cities in the Toshihiko Mochida UK. The Class 800/801 rolling stock for the IEP was developed based on the A-train concepts of lightweight aluminum carbodies and self-supporting interior modules by taking technologies developed in Japan to provide lighter weight and higher speed and applying them to UK railway systems. It will contribute to the provision of high-quality and reliable railway services, with commercial operation scheduled to commence in 2017, following operation trials in the UK that will start in 2015. (ECML) and Great Western Main Line (GWML), that INTRODUCTION have been in service for more than 30 years(1). The IEP HITACHI developed the Class 800/801 rolling stock is an initiative of the UK Department for Transport.
    [Show full text]
  • SMART BUS to RAIL CONNECTOR SERVICE Daily Bus Service Connects
    Dec. 2013 SMART BUS to RAIL CONNECTOR SERVICE Daily bus service connects the Roanoke Civil Center and The Bedford Welcome Center (816 Burks Hill Road at the intersection of Routes 460 & 122) Bedford, VA 24523; www.visitbedford.com), to the AMTRAK Station in Lynchburg. Cost is four dollars ($4) each way and you need to have correct change since drivers carry no cash. This service is designed to serve the Northeast Regional Train Service, NOT The Crescent, so keep this in mind when making AMTRAK reservations. Service Design: Via Route U.S. 460 originates from the Roanoke Civic Center (LOT - C) in Roanoke to the Kemper Street Station in Lynchburg with one intermediary stop in Bedford at the Bedford Area Welcome Center. Passengers are able to connect with Greyhound bus service in Lynchburg; Valley Metro routes; Greater Lynchburg Transit Company routes; and Amtrak Northeast Regional train service. There is additional service that continues west to Virginia Tech Fridays through Sundays. Check the website for this schedule as well as any updates to this schedule: www.smartwaybus.com or www.valleymetro.com. Please plan to arrive at least ten minutes in advance of schedule times. The Smart Way Bus to Rail Inter-City Connector (Weekend schedule is on the reverse side) WEEKDAYS Morning Route Schedule DEPART ARRIVE DEPART ARRIVE DEPART ARRIVE DEPART ARRIVE ROANOKE BEDFORD BEDFORD LYNCHBURG LYNCHBURG BEDFORD BEDFORD ROANOKE M onday- Monday- Friday: Monday- Monday- Friday: Monday- Friday: Monday- Fri: Monday- 8:45 am Friday: 5:50 am 6:30am Friday:6:35am 7:15 am 7:20 am 7:55 am Friday: 8:00 Mondays-Fridays EVENING Route Schedule DEPART ARRIVE BEDFORD LYNCHBURG 8:20 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Rail Industry: a Showcase of Excellence 1 the UK Rail Industry: a Showcase of Excellence
    The UK Rail Industry: A Showcase of Excellence 1 The UK Rail Industry: A Showcase of Excellence Today, nearly 20% of all European passenger journeys take place within the UK The UK Rail Industry: A Showcase of Excellence 01 UK rail: the facts Track kilometres 32,000 Stations 2,500 Trains 4,000 Daily services 20,000 Passenger kilometres 58 billion A World- Passenger journeys 1.5 billion Class Rail Freight tonnes 110 billion Network The UK rail industry has undergone a radical transformation over recent years to become one of the safest, most reliable and most punctual rail networks anywhere in the world. In a regional context these achievements are reflected in higher passenger approval and safety rankings than key European competitors. Today, nearly 20 per cent of all European passenger journeys take place in the UK. This also makes the network the fastest growing in Europe. Rail passenger growth has outperformed population and employment growth and is double the rate of growth of GDP. 02 The UK Rail Industry: A Showcase of Excellence Passenger and workforce fatality rates - major Europe’s most European railways satisfied rail customers Fatalities per billion train kilometres (2007-11) Europe’s most improved Finland 80% UK 2.6 railways UK 78% Germany st 12.3 1 UK France 74% th 7 Germany France 1 7. 3 10th France Germany 51% rd 31.3 23 Italy Italy 39% Italy Source: European Commission Source: European Commission Source: Eurostat Best for Best for Best for improvement customers safety Britain’s railways are the The UK’s railways are ranked The UK has one of the safest most improved in Europe, as one of the best major railways in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    Kemper Street Industrial Historic District City of Lynchburg, Virginia 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) Category of Property (Check only one box) X private ___ building(s) ___ public-local _x_ district ___ public-State ___ site ___ public-Federal ___ structure ___ object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing __5__ __0__ buildings __0__ __0__ sites __1__ __0__ structures __0__ __0__ objects __6__ __0__ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register __0__ Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) ___n/a____ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: INDUSTRY Sub: Manufacturing Facility INDUSTRY Industrial Storage DOMESTIC Institutional Housing TRANSPORTATION Rail-related Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: INDUSTRY Sub: Industrial Storage TRADE Specialty Store WORK IN PROGESS VACANT TRANSPORTATION Rail-related 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Georgian Revival 20th Century Industrial Vernacular Art Deco Materials (Enter categories from instructions) Foundation Concrete roof Built-up walls Brick, Concrete/Stucco other n/a Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Kemper Street Industrial Historic District City of Lynchburg, Virginia 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing) X A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. ____ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Guidance: Detailed Coverage for Supported Transit Systems
    Urban Guidance: Detailed coverage for supported transit systems Andorra .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Argentina ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Austria .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Brazil ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Chile ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Colombia .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Croatia .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]