Burnt Corn a Town of Mystery
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Alabama Historical Association Is the Oldest Statewide Historical Society in Alabama
VOLUME 28 ISSUE 1 Alabama SPRING 2013 Historical Association 66th Annual Meeting April 11-13, 2013, Eufaula, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS AHA Executive Committee PRESIDENT Marty Olliff, Troy University Dothan Campus 3-4 President’s Message, Marty Olliff VICE PRESIDENT Gayle Thomas, Abbeville 5-8 Eufaula to Host Annual Meeting SECRETARY Mark Wilson, Auburn University 9 “Making History Public” Workshop MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY Debbie Pendleton, Alabama Department of Archives and History 10-11 Schedule of Events TREASURER John Hardin, Alabama Department of Archives and History 12 Meeting Sites and Accommodations IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Steve Murray, Alabama Department of Archives and History 13 Map AT-LARGE MEMBERS Valerie Burnes, Dorothy Walker 14-15 Pre-Meeting Tours: Chattahoochee AHA Editors Indian Heritage Center, Fort Mitchell, THE ALABAMA REVIEW Eufaula Barbour Chamber of R. Volney Riser, University of West Alabama AHA Newsletter Commerce, Fairview Cemetery, Carey Cauthen, University of Alabama at Birmingham Shorter Cemetery AHA Board of Directors 2012-2013 Jim Baggett, Birmingham Public Library 16-17 Reception: Fendall Hall Ramona Beck, Fort Payne Valerie Pope Burnes, The University of West Alabama 18-21 Tour Previews Lonnie Burnett, University of Mobile Nicholas Cobbs, Greensboro 22 Dothan’s Understudy Theater presents James Cox, Grove Hill Brad Creed, Samford University “Grits on the Side” at Annual Banquet; Harriet Amos Doss, University of Alabama at Birmingham Bertis English, Alabama State University John Hall Presents Breakfast Program April Folden, Florence James E. Foshee, Huntsville 23-27 2012 Historical Markers Kari Frederickson, University of Alabama John C. Hall, Tuscaloosa T. R. Henderson, Headland Martha Houston, Montgomery John Kvach, University of Alabama in Huntsville William Melton, Evergreen Chris McIlwain, Tuscaloosa Gwen Patton, Trenholm State Technical College Paul Pruitt, Tuscaloosa Doug Purcell, Eufaula David Robb, Huntsville J. -
Challenge Bowl 2020
Notice: study guide will be updated after the December general election. Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ...................................................................................................... -
Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error. -
The African American Experience and the Creek
The African American Experience and the Creek War, 1813-14: An Annotated Bibliography Task Agreement NumberP16AC01696 Under Cooperative Agreement Number P13AC00443 Between The United States Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service Horseshoe Bend National Military Park and Auburn University August 8, 2017 Report Prepared By Kathryn H. Braund Hollifield Professor of Southern History Auburn University Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................... 3 Essay on Sources .............................................................................. 4 Annotated Bibliography ............................................................. 38 Manuscript Primary Sources ..................................... 39 Published Primary Sources ........................................ 56 Primary Sources: Internet Databases .................... 78 Newspapers and Periodicals ..................................... 83 Illustrations, Maps, and Photographs .................... 86 Secondary Sources ......................................................... 89 Tertiary Sources .......................................................... 113 Note on Accompanying Documents ................................... 115 2 INTRODUCTION This project sought to identify primary, secondary, and tertiary sources related to the experience of African-Americans prior to, during, and after the Creek War (1813-1814) and the War of 1812. For the period immediately following the Creek War, the project also sought information -
The Creek War of 1813-1814
The Creek War of 1813-1814 Moderator’s Guide “In classrooms where teachers use deliberation, students learn to think critically, work through differences, and interact with people who may or may not share their point of view. Teaching through deliberation provides students with the skills and abilities to work with others as citizens to claim a better future for their communities.” - Stacie Molnar-Main, Deliberation in the Classroom This issue guide is designed for classroom deliberation on a period of Alabama history that deserves more of our attention: the Creek Indian Civil War of 1813-14. Deliberation is a form of discussion where participants weigh the pros and cons of different approaches to solving a complex problem. Participants work through various tradeoffs or consequences of actions with respect and passion, and, over time, they develop skills required for living in a democratic society: critical thinking, communication, judgment, and empathy. This classroom deliberation invites students to consider the difficult choices that faced Creek Indians in 1813. About the Project This issue guide was developed in collaboration with the Charles F. Kettering Foundation as part of a research project on integrating historical and civic education. Partners include the Caroline Marshall Draughon Center for the Arts & Humanities in the College of Liberal Arts at Auburn University; Clarke County Historical Museum; and the David Mathews Center for Civic Life. Special thanks to colleagues at the Alabama Department of Archives and History and the Alabama Bicentennial Commission, as well as Dr. Kathryn Holland Braund, History Department, Auburn University. This issue guide is dedicated to Robert Thrower (1961-2017), Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Poarch Creek Indians. -
Creek Indian War of 1813-1814
National Park Service Ocmulgee Mounds U.S. Department of Interior Ocmulgee Mounds NHP The Creek Indian War of 1813-1814 RIFT OF In the fall of 1811, the great Shawnee chief Tecumseh came to incite the Creeks of THE CREEK Georgia against the whites. He gave a speech at the town of Tuckabatchee challenging CONFEDERACY the Creeks to regain their former glory. In Florida, the Spanish encouraged the discord between Indians and settlers, hoping to gain politically and economically. A rift opened in the Creek Confederacy between those who wanted to remain loyal to the settlers and those who wanted to expel the whites. The latter group, called the Red Sticks because of the red-painted clubs they carried, needed more arms to accomplish their goals and in 1813 a contingent journeyed to Pensacola, Florida to purchase guns and gunpowder from the Spanish. On their return journey, they were attacked by militia and settlers who wanted to prevent the Red Sticks from acquiring ammunion. This skirmish, called the Burnt Corn incident because of the nearby Burnt Corn Creek, escalated the conflict to a point of no return for the Red Sticks. CREEK Two weeks after the Burnt Corn incident, Fort Sinquefield protected a group of RETALIATION the Red Sticks gathered on the banks of settlers, including refugees from the recent the Alabama River to discuss plans for trouble, friendly Creeks and 15 armed retaliation. It was decided to divide the men. Unaware of the approaching danger, Creeks into two sections and attack Fort the inhabitants, along with a contingent Mims and Fort Sinquefield. -
Project for a State Park System for Alabama Sam Findley Brewster University of Massachusetts Amherst
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1932 Project for a state park system for Alabama Sam Findley Brewster University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Brewster, Sam Findley, "Project for a state park system for Alabama" (1932). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1353. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1353 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. D UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS D LIBRARY M D 1932 B%8 O Archives Thesis — ——^^^^^^^===== L D ! This thesis is not to be loaned outside the library building. For this purpose, use the copy in the department where the work of the thesis was done. PROJECT FOB A STATE PARK SYSTEM FOR ALABAMA by SAM FINDLEY BREWSTER THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DECREE OF MASTER IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MASSAG1DBITTS STATE COLLEGE AMHERST, MASSACHUSETTS MAT, 1932 Graduate Committee PROJECT FOR A STATE PARK SYSTEM FOR ALABAMA A. introduction. B. History of State Park Development. C. Purposes, Functions, and Value of State Parks. D. Legislation for and Administration of State Parks. 1. Methods of acquiring state parks. 2. Methods of administering state parks. E. Location of State Parks. F. Financing State Park Systems. G. The Situation in Alabama. 1. Why the work has not gone forward. 2. Reasons irhy park work should go forward. H. -
2013 01 Echoes
The January Meeting Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 3:00 p. m. At THE NEWSLE TTER FOR The Poarch Creek Indian Cultural Museum in Atmore THE ESCAMBIATHE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER AND JOURNAL FOR AND JOURNAL NEWSLETTER ECHOES Escambia Escambia The Poarch Creek Indian Cultural THE Museum and Welcome Center The Program: A guided tour of the Poarch Creek Indian Cultural THE ESCAMBIA COUNTYHISTORICAL SOCIETY Museum and Welcome Center by Museum Archivist Dr. Deidre Dees and Tribal Historical Preservation Officer Robert Thrower Car Pool from Brewton: Meet at the Thomas E. McMillan Museum at 2:00 p.m. Traveling on Your Own: The Museum is located on County Road 1 (Jack Springs Road) in Atmore. When coming from north to south on Interstate 65, exit on County Road 1 (Exit 54) and turn right. When coming from south to north on the Interstate, exit on County Road 1 (Exit 54) and turn left. Dinner after the Meeting: For those interested, Dr. Dees has arranged for a private room at the Wind Creek Casino for dinner. The dinner will be a buffet and will be "Dutch Treat." The Buffet is $15.95 per person, plus the cost of drinks. Contents The February ECHS Meeting Poarch Band of Creek Indians Open February 26, 2013 2 Cultural Center 3:00 p. m. Poarch Museum Exhibits 2 The Thomas E McMillan Museum Historic Check Donated to Museum 4 ECHS Loses Member & 6 The Program: Mr. John Shiver of Atmore, a WWII News and Announcements 7 vet who has just published the memoir Digging for History 7 Symbol of the Poarch of his experiences as a flight engineer/ Creek Indians Snapshots of ECHS Christmas Party 8 gunner, will be our speaker. -
Civilizing” Influence of Slavery
The “Civilizing” Influence of Slavery The Introduction of African-American Slavery into the Creek Nation and the Spread of American Slave Society into the Southern Frontier Jacob Goldenberg Advisor: Professor Alan Brinkley Second Reader: Professor Barbara J. Fields April 2013 Columbia University in the City of New York Department of History Abstract Prior to its founding as an English colony, modern-day Georgia was populated largely by members of what the English termed to be the Creek Confederacy, a loosely unified conglomeration of various tribes and language groups. Over the course of a century, from Georgia’s founding in 1733 until the removal of the Creeks to lands west of the Mississippi in the early 1830s, Creek lands were slowly adopted into southern slave society. This thesis will focus on the evolving attitudes of American slave-owners towards the presence of slavery among the Creeks of Georgia, and how slavery’s growth affected Creek society and sovereignty east of the Mississippi. During the colonial period, the Creek country was an uncontrolled cultural breeding ground on which a new and unique society with slaves began to emerge. It was during this period that some Creeks themselves first came to own slaves and European slave-owners first came to live among the Creeks. Despite the incongruence of native Creek social life with this system of slavery based on racial difference, African slavery became a recognizable part of life in the Creek country, for Creeks and the new foreigners among them. The years following the Revolutionary War saw slave-owners shift gears as they looked towards colonizing more Creek lands and expanding their slave society into the interior. -
Gertrude J" Stephens for C/O Mr, John M. SNOOK, President Foley
THE BALDWIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC, QUARTERLY ,-. " ' . cy~ ';:,- nc.:m,c ir::flitl PUBLISHED BY: Gertrude J" Stephens for THE BALDWIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC,. c/o Mr, John M. SNOOK, President Foley, Alabama VOLUME III,No. 2 JANUARY 1976 • THE BALDWIN COUN!Y HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC. VOLUME III NUMBER 2· January 1976 The Baldwin County Historical Society was founded in Fairhope, Alabama on September 12, 1923, as a nonprofit organization. Contributions are deductible from Federal Income Tax because of the tax exempt status granted the Society by t_he U, S. Treasury Department. Membership in the Society is $5,00 per year single and $7.00 per year family. Single copies of the Quarterly can be purchased for $1"25 each - special rate of 50¢ each to members. Remit payments to Membership Chairman, Mrs. Lynn H. Jones, P. 0. Box 69, Stockton, Alabama 36579. Articles. and queries to be considered for publication in the Quarterly should be addressed to,the Editor, Mrs. Gertrude J. Stephens, 2 Lee Circle, Spanish Fort, Alabama 365270 Correspondence relating to information, projects, and other matters of the Society should be addressed to the President, Mr. John M. Snook, Foley, Alabama 36535, or to such project chairman. Neither the Editor nor The Baldwin County Historical Society assumes responsi bility for errors of fact or opinion expressed by contributors. All meetings wiU be .on 3rd Sunday at 2:30 p.m. at respective places noted in yearbook, unless otherwise notified - October through May. We owe it to our ancestors to preserve entire those rights, which they have delivered to our care, We owe it to our posterity, not to suffer their dearest inheritance to be destroyed" -Author unknown. -
Instruments of Empire: Colonial Elites and U.S. Governance In
INSTRUMENTS OF EMPIRE: COLONIAL ELITES AND U.S. GOVERNANCE IN EARLY NATIONAL LOUISIANA, 1803-1820 A Dissertation by MICHAEL KELLY BEAUCHAMP Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2009 Major Subject: History INSTRUMENTS OF EMPIRE: COLONIAL ELITES AND U.S. GOVERNANCE IN EARLY NATIONAL LOUISIANA, 1803-1820 A Dissertation by MICHAEL KELLY BEAUCHAMP Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, April Hatfield Committee Members, Walter Kamphoefner Colleen Murphy James Rosenheim Head of Department, Walter Buenger December 2009 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT Instruments of Empire: Colonial Elites and U.S. Governance in Early National Louisiana, 1803-1820. (December 2009) Michael Kelly Beauchamp, B.A., The University of Dallas; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. April Hatfield The United States confronted new problems of territorial expansion with the Louisiana Purchase, as it involved, for the first time, the transfer in sovereignty of a territory that contained a population who by birth, language and religion differed substantially from the inhabitants of the United States, but who had been guaranteed the rights of full citizens. A series of other colonial powers faced these same problems on the North American continent, notably the Spanish in Louisiana. As with those earlier powers, ultimately the United States pursued processes that both brought Louisiana government and law into line with its institutions, and allowed for continued local control. -
Report to Congress on the Historic Preservation of Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Sites in the United States (P.L
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Report to CoCongressngress oonn tthehe HiHistoricstoric PrPreservadoneservation ooff RRevolutionaryevolutionary War anandd War ooff 1812 SiSitestes in the UUnitednited StStatesates Prepared for The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate The Committee on Resources United States House of Representatives Prepared by American Battlefield Protection Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC September 2007 Front Cover Brandywine Battlefield (PA200), position of American forces along Brandywine Creek, Chester County, Pennsylvania. Photo by Chris Heisey. Authorities The Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Historic The American Battlefield Protection Act of 1996, as Preservation Study Act of 1996 amended (P.L. 104-333, Sec. 604; 16 USC 469k). (P.L. 104-333, Section 603; 16 USC 1a-5 Notes). Congress authorized the American Battlefield Protection Congress, concerned that “the historical integrity of Program of the National Park Service to assist citizens, many Revolutionary War sites and War of 1812 sites is at public and private institutions, and governments at all risk,” enacted legislation calling for a study of historic levels in planning, interpreting, and protecting sites where sites associated with the two early American wars. The historic battles were fought on American soil during the purpose of the study was to: “identify Revolutionary War armed conflicts that shaped the growth and development sites and War of 1812 sites, including sites within units of the United States, in order that present and future of the National Park System in existence on the date of generations may learn and gain inspiration from the enactment of this Act [November 12, 1996]; determine the ground where Americans made their ultimate sacrifice.