Neither Victor Nor Vanquished: America in the War of 1812

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neither Victor Nor Vanquished: America in the War of 1812 NEITHER VICTOR NOR VANQUISHED Related Titles from Potomac Books Redcoats’ Revenge: An Alternate History of the War of 1812 —Col. David Fitz-Enz, USA (Ret.) The Revolutionary Years, 1775–1789: The Art of American Power During the Early Republic —William Nester The Hamiltonian Vision, 1789–1800: The Art of American Power During the Early Republic —William Nester The Jeffersonian Vision, 1801–1815: The Art of American Power During the Early Republic —William Nester A Call to the Sea: Captain Charles Stewart of the USS Constitution —Claude Berube and John Rodgaard NEITHER VICTOR NOR VANQUISHED America in the War of 1812 WILLIAM WEBER Copyright © 2013 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska All rights reserved Potomac Books is an imprint of the University of Nebraska Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Weber, William, 1951– Neither victor nor vanquished : America in the War of 1812 / William Weber. — First edition. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-61234-607-6 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-61234-608-3 (electronic) 1. United States—History—War of 1812. I. Title. E354.W44 2013 973.5’2—dc23 2013001472 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standards Institute Z39-48 Standard. Potomac Books 22841 Quicksilver Drive Dulles, Virginia 20166 First Edition 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS List of Illustrations . .vii Acknowledgments . .xiii Introduction . .xv 1 The Need for New Narratives . .1 2 A Classical View of the Military Balance in the War of 1812 . .25 3 Invasions of 1814 and 1863 . .47 4 The Men Who Governed America during the War of 1812 . .73 5 Dueling Narratives: Henry Adams’s Alternative History of the War of 1812 . .99 6 The Battle of Bladensburg: Could Washington Have Been Saved? . .121 7 Victory or Defeat, and for Whom? Alternative Outcomes for the War of 1812 . .143 8 A Worst-Case Scenario for the War of 1812 . .167 9 What if the War of 1812 Had Never Occurred? . .185 Chronology . .205 Notes . .211 Bibliographic Note and Sources . .223 Index . .233 About the Author . .243 This page intentionally left blank ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES 1. Key Factors: Comparative Advantages . .42 2. Alternative Outcomes . .151 MAPS 1. The Northern Frontier . .viii 2. The Southern Frontier . .ix 3. Niagara River Area . .x 4. Chesapeake Bay Area . .xi 5. Battle of Gettysburg . .xii vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I owe many people a debt of gratitude for their assistance in writing this book. My parents, Jack and Fran, began my lifelong interest in history. Not a Christmas passed without another history book from the Landmark Books series that my siblings and I shared and fought over. Many years later, they also sup- ported my undergraduate education at Canisus College, where I majored in history and benefited greatly from the honors program run by Dr. James Valone and Dr. Walter Sharrow. Both professors taught me about the craft of history and discipline of historiography. My particular interest in the War of 1812 stems from having lived the major- ity of my life in Buffalo, New York, and Washington, D.C. Long aware that the British Army had captured both “villages” during the war sparked my interest in the conflict. Pierre Berton’s The Invasion of Canada, 1812–1813 was the first of many volumes that now occupy my shelves. I have enjoyed learning about the war through the writings of many other authors, such as Donald Hickey, J. Mackay Hitsman, Donald Graves, and J. C. A. Stagg—just to name a few. Several people were instrumental in the production of this book. Dr. Roger George of National Defense University provided a useful critique on an earlier draft, making suggestions for which I am truly grateful. At Potomac Books, Dr. Elizabeth Demers, Amanda Irle, Laura Briggs, Vicki Chamlee, and Elizabeth Norris were instrumental in turning my manuscript into a book. Ms. Beth F. MacKenzie, U.S. Army Center for Military History, pointed me to American Military History, Volume 1, The United States Army and the Forging of a Nation, 1775–1971 for the maps that appear in this book. Most important, this book would not have been possible without the patience and love of my wife, Pam, to whom it is dedicated. With two careers xiii xiv Acknowledgments and two sons, Sam and Daniel, consuming most of our waking moments, she provided the time and encouragement needed to research and write this vol- ume. Any errors of fact, interpretation, and omission in the pages that follow are, of course, mine. INTRODUCTION The bicentennial commemoration of the War of 1812 has raised popular aware- ness of this often forgotten and unappreciated conflict. Americans are already familiar with some basic facts. Francis Scott Key penned the lyrics of the “Star- Spangled Banner” as he stood on the deck of a British warship observing the ferocious bombardment of Fort McHenry in 1814. The Battle of New Orleans, the Americans’ most decided victory, took place shortly after the British and the Americans signed the Treaty of Ghent, an agreement to end the conflict, on Christmas Eve 1814. The War of 1812 is also the source of two of the most famous quotes in American naval history: “Don’t give up the ship” (or words to that effect), which a dying Capt. James Lawrence uttered aboard the frigate USS Chesapeake; and “We have met the enemy and they are ours,” which began Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry’s report of his victory on Lake Erie. His flagship, the brig USS Lawrence, also flew a banner honoring its namesake’s last words. Government and private organizations have undertaken much of this pub- lic education effort. Fort McHenry, for example, distributes a brochure listing thirty historic locations in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia along a Star-Spangled Banner Driving Tour, as well as nineteen related organi- zational websites. At many of these and similar locations in other states, reenact- ments of battles draw participants and onlookers alike. Frigates such as the USS Chesapeake in Baltimore and USS Constitution in Boston also provide compa- rable educational experiences. Despite these well-conceived and executed efforts, the War of 1812 will likely slip back into the recesses of national memory after the anniversary. For one, public attention will be diverted to a plethora of other historic anniversaries. The bicentennial of the War of 1812 coincides with the sesquicentennial of the xv xvi Introduction American Civil War. In the national imagination, Gettysburg receives more attention than Baltimore, Vicksburg more than New Orleans, and Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant far more than Andrew Jackson and Jacob Brown. The centennial anniversary of World War I, the Great War, begins in 2014. The sinking of RMS Lusitania on May 7, 1915, is a particularly somber mark, and the deaths of 128 (out of 139) American passengers tipped American sen- timents toward Britain. In 2015, attention (particularly that of grognards, or war game aficionados) will shift from the Battle of New Orleans to the 200th commemoration of the Battle of Waterloo, where the Duke of Wellington’s victory sent Napoleon Bonaparte into exile, and to the 50th anniversary of the introduction of major U.S. ground forces into Vietnam. Attention to the War of 1812 struggles against the larger and continually growing literature devoted to other American conflicts. Despite a steady stream of books and articles that cover the war’s major campaigns, battles, and per- sonalities, far more has been written on World War II, the American Civil War, the Gulf War, and the American Revolutionary War as a visit to any online or brick-and-mortar bookstore will attest. The Oxford Companion to American Military History provides summary articles on all U.S. conflicts among its more than one thousand entries, but the volume has only one entry on a spe- cific battle from the War of 1812, the Battle of New Orleans. Similarly, John Keegan’s Fields of Battle: The Wars for North America focuses on James Wolfe’s capture of Quebec, the Battle of Yorktown, the Peninsular Campaign of 1862, and the Battle of the Little Bighorn. The War of 1812 receives only a passing glance from this eminent historian. Finally, Kevin Phillips’s The Cousins’ Wars: Religion, Politics, and the Triumph of Anglo-America provides modest coverage of 1812 in its detailed and compelling analysis of the linkage between three major civil wars: the English Civil War, the American Revolutionary War, and the American Civil War.1 This relative neglect seems odd given Gordon S. Wood’s succinct assess- ment of the war in his history of the early American republic, Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815: “The War of 1812 is the strangest war in American history . it was nonetheless one of the most important wars in American history.”2 Wood argues that the War of 1812 was more important to the development of the United States than its reputation for “strangeness” suggests. Far from being a footnote to the Napoleonic wars in Europe, the War of 1812 played a vital role in setting the stage for the Civil War by securing the Louisiana Purchase, crippling the Federalist Party, bringing to power Andrew Introduction xvii Jackson and his like-minded protégés, accelerating the spread of Jeffersonian democracy, and opening the fertile lands of the Southeast to plantations and slavery. Moreover, the United States would have been a decidedly different country had the war not occurred, had it been fought differently, or had it resulted in something other than a strategic draw.
Recommended publications
  • Draft Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual - Vol
    FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL - VOL. 1 PROJECT #: FMFADA -101-2009 Submitted to the: By: Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority Interpretive Solutions, Inc. West Chester, PA 19382 Old Quarters #1 151 Bernard Road In association with: Fort Monroe, VA 23651 Leisure Business Advisors, LLC Richmond, VA 23223 and Trudy O’Reilly Public Relations JUNE 24, 2010 Hampton, VA 23661 Cover illustration credit: "Fortress Monroe, Va. and its vicinity". Jacob Wells, 1865. Publisher: Virtue & Co. Courtesy the Norman B. Leventhal Map Center at the Boston Public Library Fort Monroe Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual June 24, 2010 Interpretive Solutions, Inc. FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL Table of Contents Executive Summary . 6 Three Urgent Needs . 7 Part 1: Introduction . 8 1.1. Legislative Powers of the Fort Monroe Authority . 9 1.2. The Programmatic Agreement . 9 1.3 Strategic Goals, Mission and Purpose of the FMA . 10 1.3 The Interpretive Master Plan . 10 1.3.1 Project Background . 11 1.3.2 The National Park Service Planning Model . 12 1.3.3 Phased Approach . 13 1.3.4 Planning Team Overview . 13 1.3.5 Public Participation . 14 Part 2: Background . 16 2.1 The Hampton Roads Setting . 16 2.2 Description of the Resource . 17 2.3 Brief Historical Overview . 19 2.4 Prior Planning . 22 2.5 The Natural Resources Working Group . 22 2.6. The African American Culture Working Group . 22 Part 3: Foundation for Planning . 24 3.1 Significance of Fort Monroe . 24 3.2 Primary Interpretive Themes .
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Historical Association Is the Oldest Statewide Historical Society in Alabama
    VOLUME 28 ISSUE 1 Alabama SPRING 2013 Historical Association 66th Annual Meeting April 11-13, 2013, Eufaula, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS AHA Executive Committee PRESIDENT Marty Olliff, Troy University Dothan Campus 3-4 President’s Message, Marty Olliff VICE PRESIDENT Gayle Thomas, Abbeville 5-8 Eufaula to Host Annual Meeting SECRETARY Mark Wilson, Auburn University 9 “Making History Public” Workshop MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY Debbie Pendleton, Alabama Department of Archives and History 10-11 Schedule of Events TREASURER John Hardin, Alabama Department of Archives and History 12 Meeting Sites and Accommodations IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Steve Murray, Alabama Department of Archives and History 13 Map AT-LARGE MEMBERS Valerie Burnes, Dorothy Walker 14-15 Pre-Meeting Tours: Chattahoochee AHA Editors Indian Heritage Center, Fort Mitchell, THE ALABAMA REVIEW Eufaula Barbour Chamber of R. Volney Riser, University of West Alabama AHA Newsletter Commerce, Fairview Cemetery, Carey Cauthen, University of Alabama at Birmingham Shorter Cemetery AHA Board of Directors 2012-2013 Jim Baggett, Birmingham Public Library 16-17 Reception: Fendall Hall Ramona Beck, Fort Payne Valerie Pope Burnes, The University of West Alabama 18-21 Tour Previews Lonnie Burnett, University of Mobile Nicholas Cobbs, Greensboro 22 Dothan’s Understudy Theater presents James Cox, Grove Hill Brad Creed, Samford University “Grits on the Side” at Annual Banquet; Harriet Amos Doss, University of Alabama at Birmingham Bertis English, Alabama State University John Hall Presents Breakfast Program April Folden, Florence James E. Foshee, Huntsville 23-27 2012 Historical Markers Kari Frederickson, University of Alabama John C. Hall, Tuscaloosa T. R. Henderson, Headland Martha Houston, Montgomery John Kvach, University of Alabama in Huntsville William Melton, Evergreen Chris McIlwain, Tuscaloosa Gwen Patton, Trenholm State Technical College Paul Pruitt, Tuscaloosa Doug Purcell, Eufaula David Robb, Huntsville J.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge Bowl 2020
    Notice: study guide will be updated after the December general election. Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
    THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.
    [Show full text]
  • The African American Experience and the Creek
    The African American Experience and the Creek War, 1813-14: An Annotated Bibliography Task Agreement NumberP16AC01696 Under Cooperative Agreement Number P13AC00443 Between The United States Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service Horseshoe Bend National Military Park and Auburn University August 8, 2017 Report Prepared By Kathryn H. Braund Hollifield Professor of Southern History Auburn University Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................... 3 Essay on Sources .............................................................................. 4 Annotated Bibliography ............................................................. 38 Manuscript Primary Sources ..................................... 39 Published Primary Sources ........................................ 56 Primary Sources: Internet Databases .................... 78 Newspapers and Periodicals ..................................... 83 Illustrations, Maps, and Photographs .................... 86 Secondary Sources ......................................................... 89 Tertiary Sources .......................................................... 113 Note on Accompanying Documents ................................... 115 2 INTRODUCTION This project sought to identify primary, secondary, and tertiary sources related to the experience of African-Americans prior to, during, and after the Creek War (1813-1814) and the War of 1812. For the period immediately following the Creek War, the project also sought information
    [Show full text]
  • The Creek War of 1813-1814
    The Creek War of 1813-1814 Moderator’s Guide “In classrooms where teachers use deliberation, students learn to think critically, work through differences, and interact with people who may or may not share their point of view. Teaching through deliberation provides students with the skills and abilities to work with others as citizens to claim a better future for their communities.” - Stacie Molnar-Main, Deliberation in the Classroom This issue guide is designed for classroom deliberation on a period of Alabama history that deserves more of our attention: the Creek Indian Civil War of 1813-14. Deliberation is a form of discussion where participants weigh the pros and cons of different approaches to solving a complex problem. Participants work through various tradeoffs or consequences of actions with respect and passion, and, over time, they develop skills required for living in a democratic society: critical thinking, communication, judgment, and empathy. This classroom deliberation invites students to consider the difficult choices that faced Creek Indians in 1813. About the Project This issue guide was developed in collaboration with the Charles F. Kettering Foundation as part of a research project on integrating historical and civic education. Partners include the Caroline Marshall Draughon Center for the Arts & Humanities in the College of Liberal Arts at Auburn University; Clarke County Historical Museum; and the David Mathews Center for Civic Life. Special thanks to colleagues at the Alabama Department of Archives and History and the Alabama Bicentennial Commission, as well as Dr. Kathryn Holland Braund, History Department, Auburn University. This issue guide is dedicated to Robert Thrower (1961-2017), Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Poarch Creek Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Creek Indian War of 1813-1814
    National Park Service Ocmulgee Mounds U.S. Department of Interior Ocmulgee Mounds NHP The Creek Indian War of 1813-1814 RIFT OF In the fall of 1811, the great Shawnee chief Tecumseh came to incite the Creeks of THE CREEK Georgia against the whites. He gave a speech at the town of Tuckabatchee challenging CONFEDERACY the Creeks to regain their former glory. In Florida, the Spanish encouraged the discord between Indians and settlers, hoping to gain politically and economically. A rift opened in the Creek Confederacy between those who wanted to remain loyal to the settlers and those who wanted to expel the whites. The latter group, called the Red Sticks because of the red-painted clubs they carried, needed more arms to accomplish their goals and in 1813 a contingent journeyed to Pensacola, Florida to purchase guns and gunpowder from the Spanish. On their return journey, they were attacked by militia and settlers who wanted to prevent the Red Sticks from acquiring ammunion. This skirmish, called the Burnt Corn incident because of the nearby Burnt Corn Creek, escalated the conflict to a point of no return for the Red Sticks. CREEK Two weeks after the Burnt Corn incident, Fort Sinquefield protected a group of RETALIATION the Red Sticks gathered on the banks of settlers, including refugees from the recent the Alabama River to discuss plans for trouble, friendly Creeks and 15 armed retaliation. It was decided to divide the men. Unaware of the approaching danger, Creeks into two sections and attack Fort the inhabitants, along with a contingent Mims and Fort Sinquefield.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D- Agency Correspondence
    HRCS; Ms. Ms. Julie V. Langan; April 1, 2016 Page 2 of 14 Background The purpose of the HRCS is to relieve congestion at the I-64 Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel in a manner that improves accessibility, transit, emergency evacuation, and military and goods movement along the primary transportation corridors in the Hampton Roads region, including the I-64, I-664, I-564, and Route 164 corridors (Figure 1). The four build alternatives (A, B, C, and D) that have been retained for full analysis in the SEIS were described in detail in our February 2016 letter. The location and configuration of each is shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 depicts the 500-foot-wide Study Area Corridors associated with each build alternative (along with expanded areas at the locations of potential interchange improvements) which, for the purposes of Section 106, constitute the Area Potential Effects (APE) for direct effects. We would like to emphasize that the 500-foot Study Area Corridors are so-called “worst-case scenarios” for direct impacts. As work on the SEIS proceeds, more realistic and presumably narrower Limits of Disturbance will be delineated for each alternative based on early preliminary engineering. For example, VDOT and FHWA have already agreed that improvements proposed in the HRCS SEIS to the I-64 corridor largely would be confined to existing highway right-of- way. In general, in undeveloped areas or in areas where alternatives cross water, VDOT defined the APE for indirect effects (e.g., visual or auditory effects) as extending 500 feet beyond each side of the 500-foot Study Area Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 01 Echoes
    The January Meeting Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 3:00 p. m. At THE NEWSLE TTER FOR The Poarch Creek Indian Cultural Museum in Atmore THE ESCAMBIATHE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER AND JOURNAL FOR AND JOURNAL NEWSLETTER ECHOES Escambia Escambia The Poarch Creek Indian Cultural THE Museum and Welcome Center The Program: A guided tour of the Poarch Creek Indian Cultural THE ESCAMBIA COUNTYHISTORICAL SOCIETY Museum and Welcome Center by Museum Archivist Dr. Deidre Dees and Tribal Historical Preservation Officer Robert Thrower Car Pool from Brewton: Meet at the Thomas E. McMillan Museum at 2:00 p.m. Traveling on Your Own: The Museum is located on County Road 1 (Jack Springs Road) in Atmore. When coming from north to south on Interstate 65, exit on County Road 1 (Exit 54) and turn right. When coming from south to north on the Interstate, exit on County Road 1 (Exit 54) and turn left. Dinner after the Meeting: For those interested, Dr. Dees has arranged for a private room at the Wind Creek Casino for dinner. The dinner will be a buffet and will be "Dutch Treat." The Buffet is $15.95 per person, plus the cost of drinks. Contents The February ECHS Meeting Poarch Band of Creek Indians Open February 26, 2013 2 Cultural Center 3:00 p. m. Poarch Museum Exhibits 2 The Thomas E McMillan Museum Historic Check Donated to Museum 4 ECHS Loses Member & 6 The Program: Mr. John Shiver of Atmore, a WWII News and Announcements 7 vet who has just published the memoir Digging for History 7 Symbol of the Poarch of his experiences as a flight engineer/ Creek Indians Snapshots of ECHS Christmas Party 8 gunner, will be our speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Craney Island Bicentennial 22 June 2013
    Norfolk Historical Society and Portsmouth History Commission Battle of Craney Island Bicentennial 22 June 2013 Bicentennial of a Virginian Victory NORFOLK – (MAY 13, 2013) – Portsmouth and Norfolk will celebrate the bicentennial of the Battle of Craney Island in a series of events on both banks of the Elizabeth River June 8-23. On June 22, historic Fort Norfolk will ring with the sounds of a bygone era as uniformed reenactors, civilian and military officials commemorate the exact bicentennial of the War of 1812's Battle of Craney Island. The free, public event will feature a victory ceremony; 21-gun salute; a three minute victory bell peal from participating Norfolk and Portsmouth churches; an Anglo- American wreath laying; and a mayoral Victory Proclamation, said Chris Melhuish, chairman of the Battle of Craney Island Bicentennial Committee. The fort will be open throughout the weekend and the public will be able to observe live cannon and musket fire demonstrations. Since the commemoration represents the collaborative efforts of the Portsmouth History Commission and the Norfolk Historical Society, Melhuish described the overall bicentennial as a “tale of two cities.” Capt. Arthur Emmerson, a Portsmouth hero of the battle, will be honored June 14 at Trinity Episcopal Church in Portsmouth, while the final bicentennial event will take place June 23 at the Hoffler Creek Wildlife Preserve, where a public picnic replete with reenactors, music and family activities will be held a short distance from where the British force first landed. In the summer of 1813, Craney Island was then a barren plot of land some 900 yards long by 250 yards wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Note to Teachers: This War of 1812 Unit Was Originally Created For
    Note to Teachers: This War of 1812 Unit was originally created for a 5th grade class in Baltimore, Maryland. The activities may be edited to meet the needs of your classroom. The War of 1812 Due: Student Name _________________________________________________ Homeroom Teacher ___________________________________________ Task 1: CAUSES (Due: ) 1. In Your own words describe the various causes of the War of 1812. _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Civilizing” Influence of Slavery
    The “Civilizing” Influence of Slavery The Introduction of African-American Slavery into the Creek Nation and the Spread of American Slave Society into the Southern Frontier Jacob Goldenberg Advisor: Professor Alan Brinkley Second Reader: Professor Barbara J. Fields April 2013 Columbia University in the City of New York Department of History Abstract Prior to its founding as an English colony, modern-day Georgia was populated largely by members of what the English termed to be the Creek Confederacy, a loosely unified conglomeration of various tribes and language groups. Over the course of a century, from Georgia’s founding in 1733 until the removal of the Creeks to lands west of the Mississippi in the early 1830s, Creek lands were slowly adopted into southern slave society. This thesis will focus on the evolving attitudes of American slave-owners towards the presence of slavery among the Creeks of Georgia, and how slavery’s growth affected Creek society and sovereignty east of the Mississippi. During the colonial period, the Creek country was an uncontrolled cultural breeding ground on which a new and unique society with slaves began to emerge. It was during this period that some Creeks themselves first came to own slaves and European slave-owners first came to live among the Creeks. Despite the incongruence of native Creek social life with this system of slavery based on racial difference, African slavery became a recognizable part of life in the Creek country, for Creeks and the new foreigners among them. The years following the Revolutionary War saw slave-owners shift gears as they looked towards colonizing more Creek lands and expanding their slave society into the interior.
    [Show full text]