Virginia's Historical Highway Markers & the War of 1812

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Virginia's Historical Highway Markers & the War of 1812 Virginia’s Historical Highway Markers & The War of 1812 Produced by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources for the 2014 Legacy Symposium Fort Monroe & Hampton University June 19–21, 2014 War of 1812 Historical Markers he following compilation presents markers alphabetically by jurisdiction, then by marker title Twithin each locality. Many of these markers, specifically those created by VDHR in part- nership with the Virginia Bicentennial of the American War of 1812 Commission, have the text below on their reverse side. These bicentennial affiliated markers are flagged in this guide with an asterisk (*). The War of 1812 Impressment of Americans into British service and the violation of American ships were among the causes of America’s War of 1812 with the British, which lasted until 1815. Beginning in 1813, Virginians suffered from a British naval blockade of the Chesapeake Bay and from British troops plundering the countryside by the Bay and along the James, Rappahannock, and Potomac rivers. The Virginia militia deflected a British attempt to take Norfolk in 1813 and engaged British forces throughout the war. By the end of the war, more than 2000 enslaved African Americans in Virginia had gained their freedom aboard British ships. • Erected Markers Accomack County City of Chesapeake Tangier Island Q-7-a Craney Island K-266 The island was visited in 1608 by Captain John Smith, Seven miles northeast in the Elizabeth River is Craney who gave it the name. A part was patented by Ambrose Island, a landmark of two wars. During the War of White in 1670. It was settled in 1686 by John Crockett 1812, the British attacked its fortifications on 22 June and his sons’ families. In 1814, it was the headquarters 1813, but were repulsed by its defenders including the of a British fleet ravaging Chesapeake Bay. From here Portsmouth artillery. During the Civil War, while aban- the fleet sailed to attack Fort McHenry near Baltimore. doning Norfolk in April 1861, the Union forces scut- The Rev. Joshua Thomas, in a prayer, predicted the tled the USS Merrimack. The Confederates refloated failure of the expedition. It was in this attack that the it and transformed it into their first ironclad, the CSS Star-Spangled Banner was written. Virginia. Famous for its duel to a draw with the USS Monitor, the Virginia was scuttled at Craney Island on 11 May 1862, when the Confederates evacuated Nor- Bedford County folk. Joel Leftwich KM-6 Within a few miles of here lived and died Joel Left- City of Hampton wich, militia general, legislator, justice of the peace, and Revolutionary War veteran. In the War of 1812, he Admiral Sir George Cockburn on the Chesapeake commanded a brigade of Virginia militia that marched WY-102* in the winter of 1812-1813 to assist Gen. William Hen- During the War of 1812, a British naval squadron ry Harrison defeat the British in Ohio. While there, his arrived in Hampton Roads on 4 Feb. 1813 to establish men helped build Fort Meigs, the largest wooden- pal- a naval blockade of the Chesapeake Bay. Later com- isaded fort in North America. In the summer of 1814, manded by Adm. Sir George Cockburn, the squadron he also commanded a militia brigade that marched to remained in the Bay for two years. Its missions were the outskirts of Baltimore to assist in protecting Wash- to seize USS Constellation, to occupy Norfolk, and to ington and Baltimore from further British threats. harass, seize, and destroy commercial traffic on the Bay and its tributaries. Although the attempt to take Nor- —2— Virginia Department of Historic Resources folk failed, Cockburn’s squadron carried out numerous Historic Hampton W-87 raids on the James, Rappahannock, York, and Potomac The Native American village of Kecoughtan stood rivers. In Aug. 1814, British forces burned Washing- across the Hampton River in 1607. Soon after the ton, but were later defeated at Baltimore. English forcibly removed the inhabitants in 1610, the colonists settled there and the village grew. By the early British Approach to Hampton WY-104* eighteenth century, the royal customhouse, wharves, Following the British defeat at Craney Island on 22 warehouses, and taverns were located in the bustling June 1813, Adm. Sir John B. Warren sought revenge seaport town of Hampton. In an early Revolutionary and ordered Adm. Sir George Cockburn and Gen. War engagement, militiamen repulsed a British naval Sir Sidney Beckwith to attack Hampton. This port attack against Hampton on 24 Oct. 1775. During the town was defended by Maj. Stapleton Crutchfield’s Revolution, Hampton was the home port of the Vir- 436 militiamen and a 7-gun water battery. During the ginia State Navy. On 25 June 1813, during the War of evening of 24 June Beckwith’s 2,400 men landed near 1812, the British sacked the town. Confederates burned here at Indian Creek. The next day, Beckwith’s troops it in Aug. 1861 to prevent its use by Union troops and engaged Crutchfield’s command on the road to Hamp- slaves. ton. Capt. Servant’s company of riflemen slowed the British advance until Beckwith could use artillery to Little England W-88-1 force Servant’s withdrawal. Hampton was then open to In 1634 Capps Point, later known as Little England, British occupation. was patented by William Capps, a prominent planter who maintained a lucrative saltworks. He served as a An artist’s depiction of the occupation and burning of Washington D.C. from a book published in 1876. It shows “an inaccurate render- ing of U.S. Capitol [as] there was no center building or pediment in 1814,” according to the Library of Congress. (Library of Congress) —3— Virginia’s Historical Highway Markers & The War of 1812 burgess in the 1619 General Assembly, the first rep- resentative legislative body in the New World. On 25 June 1813, during the War of 1812, British Admiral George Cockburn sailed into the mouth of Hampton River and shelled Hampton. A complement of 450 Vir- ginia militiamen tried in vain to hold the British at bay with several small cannons mounted in the fortification at Little England. Afterward the British occupied and plundered the town. Old Point Comfort Light W-93 The lighthouse, built in 1802, is the oldest standing structure at Fort Monroe. It remains an active navi- gational aid, the property of the U.S. Coast Guard. During the War of 1812, the tower was used as a lookout by a British invasion force while they attacked Washington. The adjacent house was the lightkeepers’ quarters until the light was automated in 1973 when the house became Army property. Sack of Hampton WY-103* A marker in Lancaster County erected in 1998. (Photo: VDHR) As British Gen. Sidney Beckwith dispersed the local Henrico County militia on 25 June 1813, Adm. Sir George Cockburn feigned an attack with barges at the mouth of the Malvern Hill V-4 Hampton River. Hampton’s water battery was aban- Nearby stood the Malvern Hill manor house built for doned and the British occupied the town. Their ini- Thomas Cocke in the 17th century. The Marquis de tial march in the town became known as the Sack of Lafayette camped here in July-August 1781, and ele- Hampton. There were reports that “at little Hampton, ments of the Virginia militia encamped nearby during every horror was committed with impunity—rape, mur- the War of 1812. During the Civil War, 1 July 1862, der, pillage.” These outrages became a rallying cry for Gen. Robert E. Lee attacked Maj. Gen. George B. the defense of the Chesapeake. By the end of June, the McClellan’s Union Army of the Potomac here as it British left to raid elsewhere. retreated to the James River from the gates of Rich- mond. Although he dealt Lee a bloody defeat, McClel- lan continued his withdrawal to Harrison’s Landing. War of 1812 Military Legacy WY-105* The Malvern Hill house survived the battle as a Federal After damaging British coastal attacks during the War headquarters but burned in 1905. of 1812, Pres. James Madison recognized the need to improve the nation’s coastal defense and naval power. In 1816, Congress created the Board of Engineers for Lancaster County Fortifications and in 1818, former Napoleon aide Gen. Simon Bernard became its chief. Bernard planned a Capture of the Dolphin J-107* series of masonry fortifications, later known as the Third On 3 April 1813, one of the largest naval engagements in System, to defend every major U.S. harbor. Fort Monroe Virginia waters during the War of 1812 took place at the was the first of these forts to be constructed, beginning in mouth of Corrotoman River. One hundred five British 1819. Named for Pres. James Monroe, it protected the naval and marine forces under Lt. Polkinghorne managed entrance to Hampton Roads and the forerunner of the to subdue four American privateers: Arab, Dolphin, Lynx, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, the Gosport Navy Yard. and Racer. The largest ship, Dolphin, out of Baltimore, had twelve guns and one hundred men commanded by Capt. W.J. Stafford. Stafford stubbornly refused to give up —4— Virginia Department of Historic Resources when the other ships were taken, and defended his ship of 1812 and rose to the rank of brigadier general while until he was severely wounded and his ship boarded. commanding militia forces in Norfolk. A prominent attorney in Loudoun and Fauquier counties, he served Corotoman J-85 in the Virginia House of Delegates (1810-1817) and in This place was three miles south. Little remains of the the U.S. Congress (1817-1839), where he was among house.
Recommended publications
  • Draft Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual - Vol
    FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL - VOL. 1 PROJECT #: FMFADA -101-2009 Submitted to the: By: Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority Interpretive Solutions, Inc. West Chester, PA 19382 Old Quarters #1 151 Bernard Road In association with: Fort Monroe, VA 23651 Leisure Business Advisors, LLC Richmond, VA 23223 and Trudy O’Reilly Public Relations JUNE 24, 2010 Hampton, VA 23661 Cover illustration credit: "Fortress Monroe, Va. and its vicinity". Jacob Wells, 1865. Publisher: Virtue & Co. Courtesy the Norman B. Leventhal Map Center at the Boston Public Library Fort Monroe Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual June 24, 2010 Interpretive Solutions, Inc. FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL Table of Contents Executive Summary . 6 Three Urgent Needs . 7 Part 1: Introduction . 8 1.1. Legislative Powers of the Fort Monroe Authority . 9 1.2. The Programmatic Agreement . 9 1.3 Strategic Goals, Mission and Purpose of the FMA . 10 1.3 The Interpretive Master Plan . 10 1.3.1 Project Background . 11 1.3.2 The National Park Service Planning Model . 12 1.3.3 Phased Approach . 13 1.3.4 Planning Team Overview . 13 1.3.5 Public Participation . 14 Part 2: Background . 16 2.1 The Hampton Roads Setting . 16 2.2 Description of the Resource . 17 2.3 Brief Historical Overview . 19 2.4 Prior Planning . 22 2.5 The Natural Resources Working Group . 22 2.6. The African American Culture Working Group . 22 Part 3: Foundation for Planning . 24 3.1 Significance of Fort Monroe . 24 3.2 Primary Interpretive Themes .
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    ENVIRONMENTAL APPENDIX NORFOLK HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT VIRGINIA APPENDIX E1: Biological Assessment U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service May 2018 E1 -1 NORFOLK HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Submitted To: Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Virginia Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Norfolk District 803 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510 March 5, 2018 E1 -2 [This page intentionally left blank.] E1 -3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction, Purpose, and, Need ...................................................................................... 3 2.0 Project Scope ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Current Norfolk Harbor Project Dredging and Dredged Material Placement/Disposal Practices ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Dredging and Dredged Material Placement Practices For The Preferred Alternative .... 8 2.3 Project Schedule and Dredging Frequencies ............................................................... 11 2.4 Action Area ................................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Federally LIsted Species With the Potential to Occur in the Action Area ..................... 11 2.6 Alternate Monitoring Methods for Unexploded Ordinance/Munitions of Explosive Concern Screening ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The War of 1812
    Grade 2 Core Knowledge Language Arts® • New York Edition • Listening & Learning™ Strand Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Supplemental Guide Supplemental Read-Aloud Again!™ It Tell The War of 1812 of War The The War of 1812 Transition Supplemental Guide to the Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand GRADE 2 Core Knowledge Language Arts® New York Edition Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts, Listening & Learning, and Tell It Again! are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Design, Feasibility and Cost Analysis of Sea Barrier Systems in Norfolk, Virginia and the Comparative Cost of Shoreline Barriers by Charles H
    The Design, Feasibility and Cost Analysis of Sea Barrier Systems in Norfolk, Virginia and the Comparative Cost of Shoreline Barriers by Charles H. Hasenbank Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Naval Engineer and Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2020 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author................................................................ Department of Mechanical Engineering May 15, 2020 Certified by. Daniel Frey Professor of Mechanical Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Nicolas Hadjiconstantinou Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Theses 2 The Design, Feasibility and Cost Analysis of Sea Barrier Systems in Norfolk, Virginia and the Comparative Cost of Shoreline Barriers by Charles H. Hasenbank Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on May 15, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Naval Engineer and Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract Protecting a coastline from the damage of a storm surge, or tidal flooding associ- ated with sea level rise, is a challenging and costly engineering endeavor. Low lying properties located directly on an ocean coastline are limited in protective solutions to include constructing shoreline barriers, increasing building elevations, or relocation. However, shoreline properties on an estuary are afforded the additional protective option of a dynamic sea barrier spanning the mouth of the bay or river. The Delta Works projects in the Netherlands pioneered the design and construc- tion of large scale dynamic sea barriers. Although similar projects have been built or proposed, the high costs have minimized wide spread implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
    THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Yeardley's Fort (44Pg65)
    CHAPTER 2 YEARDLEY'S FORT (44PG65) INTRODUCTION In this chapter the fort and administrative center of Flowerdew at 44PG65 are examined in relation to town and fortification planning and the cultural behavior so displayed (Barka 1975, Brain et al. 1976, Carson et al. 1981; Barka 1993; Hodges 1987, 1992a, 1992b, 1993; Deetz 1993). To develop this information, we present the historical data pertaining to town development and documented fortification initiatives as a key part of an overall descriptive grid to exploit the ambiguity of the site phenomena and the historic record. We are not just using historic documents to perform a validation of archaeological hypotheses; rather, we are trying to understand how small-scale variant planning models evolved regionally in a trajectory away from mainstream planning ideals (Beaudry 1988:1). This helps refine our perceptions of this site. The analysis then turns to close examination of design components at the archaeological site that might reveal evidence of competence or "mental template." These are then also factored into a more balanced and meaningful cultural interpretation of the site. 58 59 The site is used to develop baseline explanatory models that are considered in a broader, multi-site context in Chapter 3. Therefore, this section will detail more robust working interpretations that help lay the foundations for the direction of the entire study. In short, learning more about this site as a representative example of an Anglo-Dutch fort/English farmstead teaches us more about many sites struggling with the same practical constraints and planning ideals that Garvan (1951) and Reps (1972) defined.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC Placet MULTIPLE PROPERTY
    NFS Form 10-900-b 4-0018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACEt SHGISfER, HISTORY MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION F RM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources C. Form Prepared by name/title John S. Salmon organization _Virginia Department of Historic Resources street & number 2801 Kensington Avenue telephone 804-367-2323 ext. 117 city or town Richmond_____________ state VA zip code 23221 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (__ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature and title of certifying official Date of tate or FeaeraHgency and ureau I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • USS Constitution Vs. HMS Guerriere
    ANTICIPATION 97 Anticipation What do sailors feel as they wait for battle to begin? Fear – Sailors worry that they or their friends might not survive the battle. What frightens you? Excitement – The adrenaline pumps as the moment the sailors have been training for arrives. How do you feel when something you’ve waited for is about to happen? Anxiety – Sailors are nervous because no one knows the outcome of the battle. What makes you anxious? Illustration from the sketchbook of Lewis Ashfield Kimberly, 1857-1860 Kimberly was Lieutenant on board USS Germantown in the 1850s Collection of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston 98 Gun Crew’s Bible As sailors waited for battle to begin, they were alone with their thoughts. They had time to dwell on the fear that they might never see their families again. Some gun crews strapped a Bible like this one to their cannon’s carriage for extra protection. Bible issued by the Bible Society of Nassau Hall, Princeton, New Jersey Bible was strapped to the carriage of a gun nicknamed “Montgomery” on board USS President, 1813 Collection of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston 99 ENGAGEMENT 100 What are the characteristics of a brave sailor? Courage – Sailors push fear aside to do their job. What have you done that took courage? Responsibility – Each sailor has to do his duty to his country, ship, and shipmates. What are your responsibilities to your community, school, or family? Team Player – Working together is critical to succeed in battle. How do you work or play as part of a team? 101 Engagement USS Constitution vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Medallic History of the War of 1812: Catalyst for Destruction of the American Indian Nations by Benjamin Weiss Published By
    Medallic History of the War of 1812: Catalyst for Destruction of the American Indian Nations by Benjamin Weiss Published by Kunstpedia Foundation Haansberg 19 4874NJ Etten-Leur the Netherlands t. +31-(0)76-50 32 797 f. +31-(0)76-50 32 540 w. www.kunstpedia.org Text : Benjamin Weiss Design : Kunstpedia Foundation & Rifai Publication : 2013 Copyright Benjamin Weiss. Medallic History of the War of 1812: Catalyst for Destruction of the American Indian Nations by Benjamin Weiss is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.kunstpedia.org. “Brothers, we all belong to one family; we are all children of the Great Spirit; we walk in the same path; slake our thirst at the same spring; and now affairs of the greatest concern lead us to smoke the pipe around the same council fire!” Tecumseh, in a speech to the Osages in 1811, urging the Indian nations to unite and to forewarn them of the calamities that were to come (As told by John Dunn Hunter). Historical and commemorative medals can often be used to help illustrate the plight of a People. Such is the case with medals issued during the period of the War of 1812. As wars go, this war was fairly short and had relatively few casualties1, but it had enormous impact on the future of the countries and inhabitants of the Northern Hemisphere. At the conclusion of this conflict, the geography, destiny and social structure of the newly-formed United States of America and Canada were forever and irrevocably altered.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the War of 1812 Sources
    Source Guide to the War of 1812 Table of Contents I. Military Journals, Letters and Personal Accounts 2 Service Records 5 Maritime 6 Histories 10 II. Civilian Personal and Family Papers 12 Political Affairs 14 Business Papers 15 Histories 16 III. Other Broadsides 17 Maps 18 Newspapers 18 Periodicals 19 Photos and Illustrations 19 Genealogy 21 Histories of the War of 1812 23 Maryland in the War of 1812 25 This document serves as a guide to the Maryland Center for History and Culture’s library items and archival collections related to the War of 1812. It includes manuscript collections (MS), vertical files (VF), published works, maps, prints, and photographs that may support research on the military, political, civilian, social, and economic dimensions of the war, including the United States’ relations with France and Great Britain in the decade preceding the conflict. The bulk of the manuscript material relates to military operations in the Chesapeake Bay region, Maryland politics, Baltimore- based privateers, and the impact of economic sanctions and the British blockade of the Bay (1813-1814) on Maryland merchants. Many manuscript collections, however, may support research on other theaters of the war and include correspondence between Marylanders and military and political leaders from other regions. Although this inventory includes the most significant manuscript collections and published works related to the War of 1812, it is not comprehensive. Library and archival staff are continually identifying relevant sources in MCHC’s holdings and acquiring new sources that will be added to this inventory. Accordingly, researchers should use this guide as a starting point in their research and a supplement to thorough searches in MCHC’s online library catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Archaeological Examination of a Battlefield Landscape: an Example from the American Civil War Battle of Wilson's Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2003 An historical archaeological examination of a battlefield landscape: An Example from the American Civil War Battle of Wilson's Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia Jameson Michael Harwood College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Harwood, Jameson Michael, "An historical archaeological examination of a battlefield landscape: An Example from the American Civil War Battle of Wilson's Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia" (2003). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626393. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-bkaa-yg82 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF A BATTLEFIELD LANDSCAPE: An Example From The American Civil War Battle Of Wilson’s Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Jameson Michael Harwood 2003 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Jameson MichaefHarwood Approved, May 2003 t Norman Barka Dennis Blanton MarleyBrown, III DEDICATION To the soldiers who fought and died the Wilson’s Wharf battlefield landscape TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements v List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Abstract ix Introduction 2 Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
    [Show full text]