ENCYCLOPEDIA of HEBREW LANGUAGE and LINGUISTICS Volume 1 A–F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ENCYCLOPEDIA of HEBREW LANGUAGE and LINGUISTICS Volume 1 A–F ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HEBREW LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS Volume 1 A–F General Editor Geoffrey Khan Associate Editors Shmuel Bolokzy Steven E. Fassberg Gary A. Rendsburg Aaron D. Rubin Ora R. Schwarzwald Tamar Zewi LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 © 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-17642-3 Table of Contents Volume One Introduction ........................................................................................................................ vii List of Contributors ............................................................................................................ ix Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... xiii Articles A-F ......................................................................................................................... 1 Volume Two Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... vii Articles G-O ........................................................................................................................ 1 Volume Three Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... vii Articles P-Z ......................................................................................................................... 1 Volume Four Transcription Tables ........................................................................................................... vii Index ................................................................................................................................... 1 © 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-17642-3 640 cultural words: biblical hebrew names, or sentences that form the core of References any esoteric formula employed for the fab- De Leeuw, Karl and Jan Bergstra (eds.). 2007. The rication of talismans show to this very day history of information security. A comprehensive handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier. an easily detectable Hebrew patina, a very Glidden, Hope. 1987. “Polygraphia and the Renais- influential, and still reprinted manual for deci- sance sign: The case of Trithemius”. Neophilolo- phering cryptographies or slang in use among gus 71:183–195. Ofer, Yosef. 2008. “Methods of encoding in Sam- delinquents or members of marginal groups, uel de Archevolti’s Arugat ha-Bosem”. European illustrates this point. The author and Ger- Journal of Jewish Studies 2:45–63. man police officer Friedrich Christian Benedikt Schippers, Arie. 2000. “The work of Samuel Archi- Avé-Lallemant (1809–1892) published between volti (1515–1611) in the light of the classical traditions and cinquecento Italian literature”. Hel- 1858 and 1862 a groundbreaking book on mantica 51:121–138. the dialects of the underworld, under the title Das deutsche Gaunerthum in seiner social- Saverio Campanini politischen, literarischen und linguistischen (IRHT—CNRS, Paris) Ausbildung zu seinem heutigen Bestande ‘The German underworld in its social, political, lit- erary and linguistic formation to its contem- Cultural Words: Biblical Hebrew porary existence’. The definition of a specific language of the Gaunerthum ‘criminal under- The ancient Hebrew lexicon contains a con- world’, coinciding in large parts with Yiddish siderable number of Kulturwörter or Wan- (of which he provides a full-fledged grammati- derwörter, that is, lexical items whose origins cal description), is not a mere reflection of the cannot be identified with certainty, but which situation of impoverished Jews ensuring their are common to cultures throughout a particu- survival through illegal activities and of other lar region, as well as loanwords borrowed from delinquents finding it useful to communicate various languages used over a wide area (from by means of this ‘strange’ language to escape the Mediterranean to South Asia). No doubt the attention of the authorities (to no avail, so Israel’s geographical location—as the land it appears), it is far more a late manifestation bridge between the two great cultural centers of the perceived connection between Judaism of Egypt and Mesopotamia, along with access and ‘forbidden secrecy’, which celebrated its to the Mediterranean Sea to the west and the triumphs from the Renaissance onwards. Red Sea, and thence the Indian Ocean, to the The particular nature of Hebrew alphabetic south—was a major factor in the absorption of signs, always oscillating between normalcy numerous foreign words. and two extreme statuses—perfect language Among the most commonly recognized Kul- barzÆl ַבְּר ֶזל or perfect swindle—can be verified, even if, turwörter in Biblical Hebrew are tannùr ‘oven’, which rank among ַתּנּוּר a posteriori, from a completely different field ‘iron’ and of knowledge, absolutely extraneous, at least the most well-traveled words in recorded linguis- apparently, to esoterism and magic. In his tic history. The former word occurs seventy-six choice to name ±alef and to use the correspond- times in the Bible. The irregular correspondence to desig- of the phonemes in Akkadian parzillu (Mari (א) ing letter of the Hebrew alphabet nate the transfinite, to give expression to the dialect barzillu), Ugaritic br≈l, Hebrew barzÆl, fact that some infinities are larger than others, Aramaic-Syriac parzel, Sabaean frzn, Arabic to skim with the tools of quantity the unfath- firzil (specifically ‘iron fetter’) indicates that this omable realm of quality, mathematician Georg word is of non-Semitic origin (and underwent Cantor anticipated, as it were, avant la lettre, borrowing within Semitic from one language the further history of ±alef in literature, epito- to another). Forms without suffixed -l include mized by Jorge Luis Borges’s short story by the Ge≠ez bërat, Amharic-Tigrinya-Harari brät, with same title (published in 1947), which gave new the same or similar forms in other Ethiopian dimensions to the autonomous dynamics of languages, as well as forms in various Cushitic polysemy in language and to the unique blend languages, e.g., Saho-Afar birtà, Khamir birät. of secrecy and revelation that affects Hebrew, Further afield, other perhaps related words for language and script, especially from an exog- metal, without a dental or fricative conso- enous perspective. nant in third position, are Egyptian bi3 ‘metal’ © 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-17642-3 cultural words: biblical hebrew 641 ’qò∫a≠ ‘helmet ַקוֹבע / ≠kò∫a ַכּוֹבע most likely ‘[meteoric] iron’ in the Pyramid (d) Hebrew) Texts), Ugaritic brr ‘tin’, and Sumerian BAR (note that the word occurs with two different (not attested as an independent lexeme, but see velars, evidence of a non-native lexeme): Hittite AN.BAR ‘iron’, ZABAR ‘bronze’, KUG.BABBAR ‘silver’, kupa•i ‘helmet’, Greek κύμβαχος kumbachos qwb≠, Syriac קובע etc.). Berber azzal ‘iron’ is probably a loanword ‘crest of helmet’; cf. Aramaic from Phoenician/Punic, in which the initial b- qubbë≠à, Arabic qubba≠a, Ge≠ez qob≠, Cushitic was misinterpreted as a preposition and -rz- was (e.g., Oromo) qobi, all denoting various types assimilated to -zz-. of head covering (e.g., the Ge≠ez term means Moving to Europe, we note that Latin *bher- ‘monk’s hood’). -kinnòr ‘lyre’: Akkadian kin ִכּנּוֹר som (or *fersom—either proto-form is possible) (e) Hebrew knr, Arabic כנר ferrum is also related. The ancient ironworks nàrum, Ugaritic knr, Aramaic < discovered at Fursill, in the Italian Dolomites, kannàrat, Sanskrit kinara, Hittite kinirri, Greek indicate that this toponym derives from our κιννύρα kinnura. pìlÆ:gÆš ‘concubine’: Greek ִפּ ֶיל ֶגשׁ word as well. Barsel ‘iron’ also appears in Rot- (f) Hebrew welsch (borrowed from Hebrew). In English, παλλακίς pallakis, Latin paelex; the Hebrew brazil denotes coal with an abnormally high word clearly is borrowed from an Indo-Euro- admixture of iron pyrites. Other connected pean language, though the source cannot be words include Anglo-Saxon braes (> Modern either the Greek or Latin forms cited. English ‘brass’), Old Friesian bress ‘copper’, The origins of some Kulturwörter are known, and Middle Dutch bras ‘metal’. but since they were borrowed into Hebrew tannùr ‘oven’ occurs fifteen already at the earliest stages of the language ַתּנּוּר The word times in the Bible, including in early texts such they also deserve to be noted here. These as Gen. 15.7 and Exod. 7.28. It is attested include three loanwords from Greek attested in .mëúèrå< (Gen ְמ ֵכָרה (in Late Egyptian as trr, later Coptic trir, and early biblical texts, viz., (a ַל ִפּיד (in the following Semitic languages: Akkadian 49.5) < μάχαιρα makhaira ‘sword’; (b tinùru (attested first at Alalakh in the Middle lappì≈ (Gen. 15.7; Exod. 20.18; five times in Babylonian period), Aramaic-Syriac tannùrà, Judges, etc.) < λαμπάς lampas ‘torch, lightning’; ,liškå< (1 Sam. 9.22; otherwise late ִל ְשׁ ָכּה (Arabic tannùr, and Mehri tënnawr. Despite and (c the similarity, this word has no connection to in 2 Kgs 23.11; Jeremiah; Ezekiel; Ezra-Nehe- the Semitic root n-w-r ‘light’, but is a regional miah; Chronicles) < λέσχη leschè ‘(wine-)hall’. Kulturwort. Beyond Egypto-Semitic, the word Names of spices, as one might expect, travel entered Middle Persian and hence Modern with the products themselves, and thus Hebrew mòr, Ugaritic ֹמר ,.Persian tanùr, Turkish tandır, Azeri tëndir, is awash with such terms, e.g Armenian t‘onir and, still further to the east, mr, Arabic murr, Greek μύρρα murra, Latin qëßì≠å< , Greek κασία ְק ִצ ָיﬠה ;’Urdu-Hindi tandùr (those familiar
Recommended publications
  • Language of the Old Testament: Biblical Hebrew “The Holy Tongue”
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 4 No 1 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy March 2015 Language of the Old Testament: Biblical Hebrew “The Holy Tongue” Associate Professor Luke Emeka Ugwueye Department of Religion & Human Relations, Faculty of Arts, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025, Awka- Anambra State, Nigeria Email: [email protected] phone - 08067674763 Doi:10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n1p129 Abstract Some kind of familiarity with the structure and thought pattern of biblical Hebrew language enhances translation and improved ways of working with the language needed by students of Old Testament. That what the authors of the Scripture say also has meaning for us today is not in doubt but they did not express themselves primarily for us or in our language, and so it requires training on our part to understand them in their own language. The features of biblical Hebrew as combined in the language’s use of imagery and picturesque description of things are of huge assistance in this training exercise for a better operational knowledge of the language and meaning of Hebrew Scripture. Keywords: Language, Old Testament, Biblical Hebrew, Holy Tongue 1. Introduction Hebrew language is the language of the culture, religion and civilization of the Jewish people since ancient times. It belongs to the northwest ancient Semitic family of languages. The word Semitic, according to Kitchen (1992) is formed from the name Shem, Noah’s eldest son (Genesis 5:32). It is an adjective derived from ‘Shem’ meaning a member of any of the group of people speaking Akkadian, Phoenician, Punic, Aramaic, and especially Hebrew, Modern Hebrew and Arabic language.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Dialects: Are They Endangered?
    Academic Research Publishing Group English Literature and Language Review ISSN(e): 2412-1703, ISSN(p): 2413-8827 Vol. 2, No. 12, pp: 131-141, 2016 URL: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=9&info=aims Saudi Dialects: Are They Endangered? Salih Alzahrani Taif University, Saudi Arabia Abstract: Krauss, among others, claims that languages will face death in the coming centuries (Krauss, 1992). Austin (2010a) lists 7,000 languages as existing and spoken in the world today. Krauss estimates that this figure could come down to 600. That is, most the world's languages are endangered. Therefore, an endangered language is a language that loses her speakers within a few generations. According to Dorian (1981), there is what is called ―tip‖ in language endangerment. He argues that a language's decline can start slowly but suddenly goes through a rapid decline towards the extinction. Thus, languages must be protected at much earlier stage. Arabic dialects such as Zahrani Spoken Arabic (ZSA), and Faifi Spoken Arabic (henceforth, FSA), which are spoken in the southern region of Saudi Arabia, have not been studied, yet. Few people speak these dialects, among many other dialects in the same region. However, the problem is that most these dialects' native speakers are moving to other regions in Saudi Arabia where they use other different dialects. Therefore, are these dialects endangered? What other factors may cause its endangerment? Have they been documented before? What shall we do? This paper discusses three main different points regarding this issue: language and endangerment, languages documentation and description and Arabic language and its family, giving a brief history of Saudi dialects comparing their situation with the whole existing dialects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hebrew-Jewish Disconnection
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Master’s Theses and Projects College of Graduate Studies 5-2016 The eH brew-Jewish Disconnection Jacey Peers Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses Part of the Reading and Language Commons Recommended Citation Peers, Jacey. (2016). The eH brew-Jewish Disconnection. In BSU Master’s Theses and Projects. Item 32. Available at http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/32 Copyright © 2016 Jacey Peers This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. THE HEBREW-JEWISH DISCONNECTION Submitted by Jacey Peers Department of Graduate Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Bridgewater State University Spring 2016 Content and Style Approved By: ___________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Joyce Rain Anderson, Chair of Thesis Committee Date ___________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Anne Doyle, Committee Member Date ___________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Julia (Yulia) Stakhnevich, Committee Member Date 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my mom for her support throughout all of my academic endeavors; even when she was only half listening, she was always there for me. I truly could not have done any of this without you. To my dad, who converted to Judaism at 56, thank you for showing me that being Jewish is more than having a certain blood that runs through your veins, and that there is hope for me to feel like I belong in the community I was born into, but have always felt next to.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semitic Component in Yiddish and Its Ideological Role in Yiddish Philology
    philological encounters � (�0�7) 368-387 brill.com/phen The Semitic Component in Yiddish and its Ideological Role in Yiddish Philology Tal Hever-Chybowski Paris Yiddish Center—Medem Library [email protected] Abstract The article discusses the ideological role played by the Semitic component in Yiddish in four major texts of Yiddish philology from the first half of the 20th century: Ysroel Haim Taviov’s “The Hebrew Elements of the Jargon” (1904); Ber Borochov’s “The Tasks of Yiddish Philology” (1913); Nokhem Shtif’s “The Social Differentiation of Yiddish: Hebrew Elements in the Language” (1929); and Max Weinreich’s “What Would Yiddish Have Been without Hebrew?” (1931). The article explores the ways in which these texts attribute various religious, national, psychological and class values to the Semitic com- ponent in Yiddish, while debating its ontological status and making prescriptive sug- gestions regarding its future. It argues that all four philologists set the Semitic component of Yiddish in service of their own ideological visions of Jewish linguistic, national and ethnic identity (Yiddishism, Hebraism, Soviet Socialism, etc.), thus blur- ring the boundaries between descriptive linguistics and ideologically engaged philology. Keywords Yiddish – loshn-koydesh – semitic philology – Hebraism – Yiddishism – dehebraization Yiddish, although written in the Hebrew alphabet, is predominantly Germanic in its linguistic structure and vocabulary.* It also possesses substantial Slavic * The comments of Yitskhok Niborski, Natalia Krynicka and of the anonymous reviewer have greatly improved this article, and I am deeply indebted to them for their help. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi �0.��63/�45�9�97-��Downloaded34003� from Brill.com09/23/2021 11:50:14AM via free access The Semitic Component In Yiddish 369 and Semitic elements, and shows some traces of the Romance languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Biblical Aramaic
    TITLE: BS400 READING BIBLICAL ARAMAIC WORKLOAD: Duration: 4 Terms Teaching (1 hr p.w.): 26 hrs Language exercises and set reading: 30 hrs Text preparation: 40 hrs Examination preparation and writing: 24 hrs Total commitment: 120 hrs STATUS: Elective CO/PREREQUISITE(S): At least 60% in BS300 Hebrew 3, or at least 70% in BS200 Hebrew 2 if Hebrew 3 is taken concurrently. GENERAL AIM: This unit aims to build on students’ knowledge of Biblcal Hebrew by imparting a working knowledge of biblical Aramaic, enabling them to read all the passages in the Old Testament where Aramaic is employed. The unit focuses on building a comprehensive vocabulary of biblical Aramaic, understanding its grammar and syntax, and applying this knowledge to the translation of the relevant texts in Daniel and Ezra. The purpose of this unit is not only to enable students to work from the original language in all parts of the Old Testament, but also to lay a linguistic foundation for any subsequent study involving Aramaic texts. LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of this course students should be able to: • Recognise and distinguish biblical Aramaic from biblical Hebrew; • Translate all biblical Aramaic texts into good, accurate English; • Parse and reproduce regular forms of the biblical Aramaic verbal system; • Analyse and explain most grammatical and phrase-level syntactical constructions. CONTENT: Part 1: Biblical Aramaic Grammar • Introduction to biblical Aramaic: occurrences; name; relationship to Hebrew; vocalization and phonology • Aramaic Nouns, pronouns, and adjectives • Prepositions and conjunctions • The Aramaic verbal system & conjugations • Strong verbs • Weak verbs • Syntax • Numerals Part 2: Reading of set texts • Reading of Daniel 2 – 7 • Reading of Ezra 4 – 7 TEACHING AND Classroom teaching and tutorials; LEARNING METHODS: Private preparation of homework assignments, reviewed in class; Class tests and oral participation; Strong emphasis on peer learning and collaborative group work.
    [Show full text]
  • Amharic-Arabic Neural Machine Translation
    AMHARIC-ARABIC NEURAL MACHINE TRANSLATION Ibrahim Gashaw and H L Shashirekha Mangalore University, Department of Computer Science, Mangalagangotri, Mangalore-574199 ABSTRACT Many automatic translation works have been addressed between major European language pairs, by taking advantage of large scale parallel corpora, but very few research works are conducted on the Amharic-Arabic language pair due to its parallel data scarcity. Two Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) based Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models are developed using Attention-based Encoder-Decoder architecture which is adapted from the open-source OpenNMT system. In order to perform the experiment, a small parallel Quranic text corpus is constructed by modifying the existing monolingual Arabic text and its equivalent translation of Amharic language text corpora available on Tanzile. LSTM and GRU based NMT models and Google Translation system are compared and found that LSTM based OpenNMT outperforms GRU based OpenNMT and Google Translation system, with a BLEU score of 12%, 11%, and 6% respectively. KEYWORDS Amharic, Arabic, Neural Machine Translation, OpenNMT 1. INTRODUCTION "Computational linguistics from a computational perspective is concerned with understanding written and spoken language, and building artifacts that usually process and produce language, either in bulk or in a dialogue setting." [1]. Machine Translation (MT), the task of translating texts from one natural language to another natural language automatically, is an important application of Computational Linguistics (CL) and Natural Language Processing (NLP). The overall process of invention, innovation, and diffusion of technology related to language translation drive the increasing rate of the MT industry rapidly [2]. The number of Language Service Provider (LSP) companies offering varying degrees of translation, interpretation, localization, language, and social coaching solutions are rising in accordance with the MT industry [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Semitic Vocalisation and Reading Traditions
    Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures Hornkohl and Khan (eds.) Studies in Semitic Vocalisation and Studies in Semitic Vocalisation Reading Traditions and Reading Traditions Aaron D. Hornkohl and Geoffrey Khan (eds.) EDITED BY AARON D. HORNKOHL AND GEOFFREY KHAN This volume brings together papers rela� ng to the pronuncia� on of Semi� c languages and the representa� on of their pronuncia� on in wri� en form. The papers focus on sources representa� ve of a period that stretches from late an� quity un� l the Middle Ages. A large propor� on of them concern reading tradi� ons of Biblical Hebrew, especially the vocalisa� on nota� on systems used to represent them. Also discussed are orthography and the wri� en representa� on of prosody. Beyond Biblical Hebrew, there are studies concerning Punic, Biblical Aramaic, Syriac, and Arabic, as well as post-biblical tradi� ons of Hebrew such as piyyuṭ and medieval Hebrew poetry. There were many parallels and interac� ons between these various language Studies in Semitic Vocalisation tradi� ons and the volume demonstrates that important insights can be gained from such a wide range of perspec� ves across diff erent historical periods. As with all Open Book publica� ons, this en� re book is available to read for free on the publisher’s website. Printed and digital edi� ons, together with supplementary digital material, can also be found here: www.openbookpublishers.com Cover image: Detail from a bilingual La� n-Punic inscrip� on at the theatre at Lepcis Magna, IRT 321 (accessed from h� ps://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Inscrip� on_Theatre_Lep� s_Magna_Libya.JPG).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Using Hebrew Language Tools Syllabus Institute
    Introduction to Using Hebrew Language Tools Syllabus 15 March to 10 May 2016 Whitney Oxford Institute of Grace Grace Immanuel Bible Church Jupiter, Florida I. Course Description and Objectives Jesus came—and will come again—to fulfill the Law and the Prophets (Matt 5:17). How, then, can we understand Him or His task if we do not know the contents of the Law and the Prophets? The better we understand “whatever was written in earlier times” (Rom 15:4), the more intimately we can know our God and Savior. Indeed, the apostle Paul testified that he stated “nothing but what the Prophets and Moses said was going to take place; that the Christ was to suffer, and that by reason of His resurrection from the dead He would be the first to proclaim light both to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles” (Acts 26:22-23). Introduction to Using Hebrew Language Tools seeks to introduce believers to biblical Hebrew and the language tools that facilitate its proper understanding. This introduction seeks to help believers: become acquainted with the Hebrew aleph beth become acquainted with frequently-occurring words in the Hebrew Scriptures become acquainted with the categories and use of Hebrew language tools recognize key terms and abbreviations used in Hebrew language tools better understand the author’s intended meaning better understand the New Testament, since its the foundation is the Old Testament recognize deviant teaching II. Course Requirements Participate in class activities and take a final assessment. 1 WEEK TOPIC 15 Introduction to course
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARIC for More Information BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    AMHARIC For more information BOSTON UNIVERSITY http://deseta.net/?attachment_id=70 About Ethiopia & Prof. Fallou Ngom Amharic Director, African Language Program Ethiopia is one of the oldest locations of [email protected] human existence. Scientists consider it the 617-353-3673 region from which Homo sapiens first set out for the Middle East and points beyond. Ethiopia traces its roots to the Aksumite http://www.bu.edu/africa/alp/ Empire circa 300BC-800AD. It has been a monarchy for most of its history. Alongside Rome, Persia, China, and India, the Kingdom of Aksum was one of the great world powers of the 3rd century and the one of the first major empires in the world to officially adopt Christianity as a state religion in the 4th century. Amharic is a Semitic language spoken in Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Djibouti. It is the second-most spoken Semitic language in the world after Arabic and is the language of some 2.7 million emigrants, including people in Europe, the US, and Canada. Amharic has a growing body of literature in many genres: novels, poetry, government proclamations and records, educational African Studies Center books, religious material, proverb collections, dictionaries, technical manuals, 232 Bay State Road and books about medical topics. Boston, MA 02215 www.bu.edu/africa Did you know? Jamaica has an Amharic connection! Roots of the word “Rastafari” actually come from Amharic, and many Rastafarians learn Amharic because they consider it a sacred language. After Ethiopian emperor Haile Selassie visited the island of Jamaica in 1966, Jamaicans Photo clipped from Fun with Phonics on Ethiopia TV organized study circles in Amharic—a parallel of sorts to the contemporary movement for MU 340 - Musical Cultures of the World civil rights in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrew Language
    A HISTOI'{Y OF TFIE HEBREW LANGUAGE ANGEL SAENZ-BADILLOS Translated by IOHN ELWOLDE Department of BtuIical Sludies' Uniaer s i t y of Shellizl d CavrnRrDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Acknozaledgements progressed and prepared a prelirninary version of the Index, and Chapter F{EBREW {I{ T E CCb{TEXT OF THE SEMITIC I-ANGT-TAGES '1.1 ASB Flehrezu, a Semitic language Madrid F{ebrew is a Semitic dialect or tranguage which developed in the northvsestern part of the Near East between the River jordan and the Mediterranean Sea during the latter half of tl'te second milienniurn tsCE. The country cornprising this area was known as Canaan, a nan'ne that is aiso associated witl'l the language in its earLiest written sources: Jllp nDq 6"p^! kena'an) 'the language of Canaan' (Xs 19:18). Eisewhere, the language is called n'Tln1 (ye-lru{i!) 'judaean, Judahite' (2Kn8:26,28, etc.). In the Hellenistic period, writers refer to it by the Greek terwv Hebraios, Hebrar'sti (Josephus, Antiquities tr, 1:2 etc.),1 and under the Rornan Ernpire it was known as fillJJ ('ibrr!) 'F{ebrew' or (f"l)'lJ$ litU! (la6on 'ibri[!l) 'Hebrew language' (Mishnah, Gittin 9:8, etc.), terms that recalled Eber (Gn 77:14), ancestor of the people that would become known,like Abraharn (Gn 74:73), by the narne'Flebrew'.2 Frorn a cultural perspective, this language was to ptray an extremely important r6le, not only in the history of the peoptre rvkro spoke it, but also wifhin Western culture in general. It was fo be 1 .l) How"u"r, C.H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arabic Language: a Latin of Modernity? Tomasz Kamusella University of St Andrews
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics Volume 11 Issue 2 DOI 10.1515/jnmlp-2017-0006 The Arabic Language: A Latin of Modernity? Tomasz Kamusella University of St Andrews Abstract Standard Arabic is directly derived from the language of the Quran. The Ara- bic language of the holy book of Islam is seen as the prescriptive benchmark of correctness for the use and standardization of Arabic. As such, this standard language is removed from the vernaculars over a millennium years, which Arabic-speakers employ nowadays in everyday life. Furthermore, standard Arabic is used for written purposes but very rarely spoken, which implies that there are no native speakers of this language. As a result, no speech com- munity of standard Arabic exists. Depending on the region or state, Arabs (understood here as Arabic speakers) belong to over 20 different vernacular speech communities centered around Arabic dialects. This feature is unique among the so-called “large languages” of the modern world. However, from a historical perspective, it can be likened to the functioning of Latin as the sole (written) language in Western Europe until the Reformation and in Central Europe until the mid-19th century. After the seventh to ninth century, there was no Latin-speaking community, while in day-to-day life, people who em- ployed Latin for written use spoke vernaculars. Afterward these vernaculars replaced Latin in written use also, so that now each recognized European lan- guage corresponds to a speech community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aksumites in South Arabia: an African Diaspora of Late Antiquity
    Chapter 11 The Aksumites in South Arabia: An African Diaspora of Late Antiquity George Hatke 1 Introduction Much has been written over the years about foreign, specifically western, colo- nialism in sub-Saharan Africa, as well as about the foreign peoples, western and non-western alike, who have settled in sub-Saharan Africa during the modern period. However, although many large-scale states rose and fell in sub- Saharan Africa throughout pre-colonial times, the history of African imperial expansion into non-African lands is to a large degree the history of Egyptian invasions of Syria-Palestine during Pharaonic and Ptolemaic times, Carthagin- ian (effectively Phoenician) expansion into Sicily and Spain in the second half of the first millennium b.c.e, and the Almoravid and Almohad invasions of the Iberian Peninsula during the Middle Ages. However, none of this history involved sub-Saharan Africans to any appreciable degree. Yet during Late Antiquity,1 Aksum, a sub-Saharan African kingdom based in the northern Ethi- opian highlands, invaded its neighbors across the Red Sea on several occasions. Aksum, named after its capital city, was during this time an active participant in the long-distance sea trade linking the Mediterranean with India via the Red Sea. It was a literate kingdom with a tradition of monumental art and ar- chitecture and already a long history of contact with South Arabia. The history of Aksumite expansion into, and settlement in, South Arabia can be divided into two main periods. The first lasts from the late 2nd to the late 3rd century 1 Although there is disagreement among scholars as to the chronological limits of “Late Antiq- uity”—itself a modern concept—the term is, for the purposes of the present study, used to refer to the period from ca.
    [Show full text]