DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Issue A VIEW FRO)UO,THE '30S IBCs~DiTBlfe 8-···- i;EFi~ (ITV IDITO·R TUINIGUT (IU8 ~II Stanley Walker Stanley Walker 4:li~;I;i.. !:r:"-~ Ji)l~~~lt~o~·rlbJtAl~sanrlf~·CYoollcotf Olh.orl~~ctio,l hJ,A[vaJol~,lslo~l i "Walker writes about his craft in a "An extremely amllsinr! book ... b:I' style which seems fresh from the very bl·iskly and pleasantly rePo'ter's typewriter, written to catch wlitten.'---H. L. Mencken an edition."-SNrl~l~lnll Xe~,ien· of' T~e Night Clllb E,n offers a singulal·l Lite~ntl~,-e serious--though nevel· sobel~- As city editor of the N~~~lYo,~li Ne~nlrl history of New York City during 'I T~·iOll~le,Stanley Walker earned a Prohibition.I-Iel·e we meet muldelels /, repLltationas one of the city's 1170St and millionaires, gangstels, resoul·ceful and astute newspaper bal·tenders, celebrities of the stage, men. In Cit~:Etliro~·, he distillshis screen,and society,and a host of i* esperiences into a robust insider's other colol·fill characters who ~ accountofthejournalism ofhis day, populatedthe city's diverse night Sixty-five years after its first clubs, from El Fey to the Cottoll p"blication, it remains a lively, entel·- Club. taiIling, and valuable record of the $17.95 paperback yolden age of American journalism. $17.')5 paperback The Johns Hopkins University Press · 1-800-537-5487· www.press.jhu.edu ;fl ~t~ Bfg~i ~ t~B1P~f ~ lel BVI~ :1687~~ Taking Stock Dilemmas of Scale in America's AmericanGovernment in the Twentieth Federal Democracy Century Martha Derthick, Editor Morton Keller and Nationalist and localist traditions vie within the Shep Melnick, Editors American federal system and the American experi- What is American government lil<etoday! How ment with self-government. Bringing together has it changed--and how has it remained the contributions from history political science, and same--over the courseof the centurynow coming sociology, this book focuses primarily on the to a close! 7h/rillgSror/r seeks to provide the filllesr local, seeking to recapture its origins, explain its and most thoughtful answers yet offered to these current Impact, and assess its worth. questions. It brings tooetherb eminent historians Contributors: iillil,! ii. A(r~~i~~·,; C~,·i~ C~uksoil, il/jtllTIIN and politicalscientists to examinethe pastexperi- ence, cul·rent state, and filture prospects of five majorAmerican public issues: trade and ral·iff policy,immigration and aliens,conservation and Ril·~a,dn%I~iiel!l: ~i·egu,:i' i~ I~i~ei; ~liri,les CZ.li~iLoi~ environmentalism,civil rights, and social welfare. WOOn~'D"Wi~O" Ce"re, P,rss Se,ies Contributors:iC/ichiiclj. L/rl·r·l: iL/ol·io,l ki·Ne,; David 0-521-64039-3 Hardback 834.95 CIO~L'~Rr·i·c( ~c·c(il, ppto· Ske,l)i L)olinlri~I'iin,~i, R Si,e~ BOOKS IN THE WOODROW WILSON CENTER PRESS SERIES ARE AVAILABLE TO Woon,~ow Wilson Center PI·ess Se,·ies WOODROW WILSON ASSOCIATES 0-521-65228-6 Hardback 854.95 AT n 20% DISCOUNT. 0-521-65545-5 Paperback 817.95 qD~9'88iis ~g~R~j~~i ~;: ·"'7' a·~-·. -~~ ~8~; ea,~-g~~ R~". ~ R L-jr^ i .·, 5" ,~~ ~~6~9 s-- ~~4~~ I ~Bs '" O ~-t~tit--~ g 1:~P~S-;~r$"eR~ · ~ F" - "-` ~S ii r=r "r: ,-o ~~~SBeti.·r-9 a 3:~l~i~g -3~~v~ 'dC~I:: ; mP 5 aCe9 ,i~~~·" 9 8,0 s,B Bin OOn ·~ :a-"a,,:g,,a eB~ c- ~· ·:-'~ t ,B ;8-~'Y"": j's~·~~ P3-; -+g id ?~.:. g 1-Z '~ $ 8 ~~" . ii ~~·e ·=l'bi i~·s~; r~a:ilr?:;;·~-; '~BB:~ ;;Jeso~ ero ~B la e~ i: a· 1-4~i-~·51~' 7PIi~ ~~P :e .8 %4~-a"~ ?": i:~ as ~ :Xp 6~w~-~~w 5:~~Pg~~~~%~a ~.;;ag 3 C BsE~ 3 r oi· o 2: i· ~8L3o·t: '" k i--l-:l,·$B P-3 28= ~;, $;s~~ aa- -~" aB·-e a o_ 8~.Bs WE-r "r. saa~ 3 i~C;E;T;iO~n os RRF ~ F:? ::P-5:~ ~"a 3Ea!e- ".;-3~a w· i3 :· ·- wE.a·,i~ 7 BrP g~"~ "8· r i: M r----------------------------------------, i'-"~ ~@ s"o ;Dii ag Cn_ ~f"fj I ::~: a .3B 4,, i· 2 1 O ~"~s-·----· b~~Lg ~,C a ii:i~l~I B :: cn I x ,6:c w rB 9 -13 5 c r, d w d ""'s ' --~--- 3io5~~0?~ ini~i. irl·a r~n -r: u, ;TP-~6 a_3: O R ~t~f~ : B";~ "m i ..i P 3 ,8;;1" ;; ~ig B'd t~~ r " a" Fs~ ~ov, 1-3 ~c.o ;Ta ~i, zJ I " 6~ a 3 1. o ~ lc. n B ;~8 gs,,3hcin nj, z, -" Ii o~, O ~-5·- ,·; ; "'8ee,, IcCJ g·- :: I-;i.., Q~I6.W 12 5 3 B=~~ o I P '~" E: a q -B"- r· I 07 i d i: ~3 ~_a;C: 4cn 5.- % ill s iriiLU -·s E·4a~,_~; r~· w ~a,i I - ,i-"" R o ··~· Ai ,o s o~& -" - ~.3 ""r·- :' .~: -+j Rqig s-_ "8' ~s~ LI:n- ~S"% Sa 8;1 I F L---------__________-____________________~ EDITOR’S COMMENT he media hoopla surrounding the millennium has already gained the intensity of a tropical storm, and the WQ is not going to toss more Treams of intellectual confetti into the tempest. Yet there is a paradox about this milestone that calls out for attention. With the 20th century, we have capped a thousand years of stupendous material and, yes, moral progress with the hundred bloodiest years in the history of humankind. Not only have we endured two world wars and innumerable smaller ones but the unimagin- able human devastation wrought by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and their imitators. Not one of the nine centuries that came before can rival our own in blood. Apart from the almost accidental tragedy of World War I, the great clash- es of our bloody century have not been provoked by the hunger for land, or riches, or other traditional sources of national desire, but by ideas— about the value of individual dignity and freedom, about the proper organi- zation of society, and ultimately about the possibility of human perfection. These conflicts were not incidental to the moral progress of the past thou- sand years but a tragic part of the quest, as societies cast off all traditional sources of moral and political authority and embraced new ideas and ide- ologies that led to radical evil. So while the world faces many concrete challenges in the future, from controlling nuclear and biological weapons to coming to terms with the possibilities of genetic engineering, our own recent history should remind us that our destiny will be most powerfully influenced by the larger ideas to which we give our allegiance. At the WQ, this millennial reminder of the urgency of ideas fortifies our sense of mission, and we hope that read- ers, too, will take from the history of the 20th century a fresh appreciation of the often questioned “relevance” of the mind. Editor: Steven Lagerfeld The Wilson Quarterly (ISSN-0363-3276) is published in Deputy Editor: Missy Daniel January (Winter), April (Spring), July (Summer), and Managing Editor: James H. Carman October (Autumn) by the Woodrow Wilson International Senior Editor: Robert K. Landers Center for Scholars at One Woodrow Wilson Plaza, 1300 Literary Editor: Stephen Bates Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004–3027. Editor-at-Large: Jay Tolson Complete article index now available online at Copy Editor: Vincent Ercolano http://wwics.si.edu/WQ/WEBIND.HTM. Subscriptions: Contributing Editors: Martha Bayles, one year, $24; two years, $43. Air mail outside U.S.: one year, Linda Colley, Denis Donoghue, Max Holland, $39; two years, $73. Single copies mailed upon request: $7; Stephen Miller, Jeffery Paine, Walter Reich, outside U.S. and possessions, $8; selected back issues: $7, Alan Ryan, Edward Tenner, Charles Townshend, including postage and handling; outside U.S., $8. Alan Wolfe, Bertram Wyatt-Brown Periodical postage paid at Washington, D.C., and additional mailing offices. All unsolicited manuscripts should be Assistant Editor: Justine A. Kwiatkowski accompanied by a self-addressed stamped envelope. Researchers: Erin E. Bair, Jennifer A. Dowdell Members: Send changes of address and all subscription corre- Librarian: Zdenek˘ V. David spondence with Wilson Quarterly mailing label to Editorial Advisers: K. Anthony Appiah, Subscriber Service, The Wilson Quarterly, P.O. Box 420406, Robert Darnton, Nathan Glazer, Harry Harding, Palm Coast, FL 32142–0406. (Subscriber hot line: Robert Hathaway, Elizabeth Johns, Michael Lacey, 1-800-829-5108.) Postmaster: Send all address changes to Jackson Lears, Seymour Martin Lipset, The Wilson Quarterly, P.O. Box 420406, Palm Coast, Robert Litwak, Wilfred M. McClay, Richard Rorty, FL 32142–0406. Microfilm copies are available from Blair Ruble, Ann Sheffield, Martin Sletzinger, Bell & Howell Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb S. Frederick Starr, Joseph Tulchin Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106. U.S. newsstand distribution Founding Editor: Peter Braestrup (1929–1997) by Eastern News Distributors, Inc., 2020 Superior Street, Publishing Director: Warren B. Syer Sandusky, Ohio 44870 (for information, call 1-800-221-3148). Publisher: Kathy Read Advertising: Hank Arizmendi, Tel.: (800) 801-8558), Fax: Business Manager: Suzanne Napper (954) 730-8404. Publisher/Mail Order: Kalish, Quigley & Circulation: Cary Zel, ProCirc, Miami, Fla. Rosen, Tel.: (212) 399-9500, Fax: (212) 265-0986. 2 WQ Autumn 1999 AUTUMN 1999 THE WILSON QUARTERLY Published by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars WQ Online: http://wwics.si.edu/WQ 35 THE LONG ROAD TO BETTER SCHOOLS Tom Loveless •Chiara R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Treaty of Versailles I
    Treaty of Versailles I. Wilson’s Vision forWorld Peace A. Fourteen Points to End All Wars 1. Wilson’s first goal was to eliminate the causes of wars by calling for an end to secret agreements and alliances, protecting freedom of the seas, and reducing armaments. 2. Wilson’s second goal was to ensure the right to self-determination so ethnic groups and nationalities could live under governments of their own choosing. 3. The last of the fourteen points called for setting up a League of Nations to ensure world peace. B. Wilson’s Unusual Decisions 1. Wilson broke with tradition by traveling out of the United States while president to lead the U.S. delegation to the peace conference in Paris. 2. Wilson weakened his position when he asked Americans to support Democrats in the 1918 midterm elections, but then the Republicans won a majority in Congress. 3. Wilson made matters worse by choosing all Democrats and only one Republican to serve as the other delegates to the peace conference. II. Ideals Versus Self-Interest at Versailles A. Peace Without Victory Gives Way to War Guilt and Reparations 1. Wilson’s vision for a peaceful world was different from the vision of other Big Four leaders. 2. France’s Georges Clemenceau was most concerned about French security. 3. David Lloyd George wanted Germany to accept full responsibility for the war through a warguilt clause and reparations. 4. Wilson tried to restrain from punishing Germany but ultimately agreed to gain support for the League of Nations. B. Self-Determination Survives, but Only in Europe 1.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives
    AP European History: Period 4.1 Teacher’s Edition World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives I. Long-term causes of World War I 4.1.I.A INT-9 A. Rival alliances: Triple Alliance vs. Triple Entente SP-6/17/18 1. 1871: The balance of power of Europe was upset by the decisive Prussian victory in the Franco-Prussian War and the creation of the German Empire. a. Bismarck thereafter feared French revenge and negotiated treaties to isolate France. b. Bismarck also feared Russia, especially after the Congress of Berlin in 1878 when Russia blamed Germany for not gaining territory in the Balkans. 2. In 1879, the Dual Alliance emerged: Germany and Austria a. Bismarck sought to thwart Russian expansion. b. The Dual Alliance was based on German support for Austria in its struggle with Russia over expansion in the Balkans. c. This became a major feature of European diplomacy until the end of World War I. 3. Triple Alliance, 1881: Italy joined Germany and Austria Italy sought support for its imperialistic ambitions in the Mediterranean and Africa. 4. Russian-German Reinsurance Treaty, 1887 a. It promised the neutrality of both Germany and Russia if either country went to war with another country. b. Kaiser Wilhelm II refused to renew the reinsurance treaty after removing Bismarck in 1890. This can be seen as a huge diplomatic blunder; Russia wanted to renew it but now had no assurances it was safe from a German invasion. France courted Russia; the two became allies. Germany, now out of necessity, developed closer ties to Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE CIVILIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 1990-91 GULF WAR THROUGH THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET By CHARLES IMBRIANI A Dissertation submitted to the Interdisciplinary Program in the Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2012 Charles Imbriani defended this dissertation on October 4, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Peter Garretson Professor Directing Dissertation Jonathan Grant University Representative Dennis Moore Committee Member Irene Zanini-Cordi Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to Fred (Freddie) Bissert 1935-2012. I first met Freddie over forty years ago when I stared working for Pan American World Airways in New York. It was twenty-two year later, still with Pan Am, when I took a position as ramp operations trainer; and Freddie was assigned to teach me the tools of the trade. In 1989 while in Berlin for training, Freddie and I witnessed the abandoning of the guard towers along the Berlin Wall by the East Germans. We didn’t realize it then, but we were witnessing the beginning of the end of the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of American Political Institutions
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS Department of Political Science, Johns Hopkins University AS.190.632 Spring 2021 Tuesdays, 2:00 PM Adam Sheingate Daniel Schlozman [email protected] [email protected] Office hours by appointment Office hours by appointment This course explores institutional development in American national politics, from the Founding until the present. It traces parties, Congress, the presidency, bureaucracy, and courts, and also examines how those institutions have interacted with one another, and shaped and been shaped by the mass public, across American history. Throughout the course, we will consider how ideas, interests, procedures, and sequence together shape institutions as they collide and abrade over time. Finally, although it hardly covers the entire corpus across the subfield, the course is also designed to prepare students to sit for comprehensive examinations in American politics. While the authors come from a variety of theoretical vantage points, combining classic and newer readings, this course is, in a sense, a very traditional one. We examine the formal sites where power is exercised, and the political elites who exercise it. By the end of the semester, you should have a better sense of the virtues – and limits – of such an approach. For three classes, you will write short (up to 5 pages) papers, succinctly bringing together the reading for a particular week. Avoid summary. Instead, specify the core theoretical, methodological, or interpretive issues at stake, and make clear how the various authors have approached them. Papers should be circulated via e-mail to the entire class by 4PM on Monday.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Development of Legitimate Party Opposition in the United States, 1793–1828
    Rethinking the Development of Legitimate Party Opposition in the United States, 1793–1828 JEFFREY S. SELINGER Writing in 1813 to his old friend and political adversary Thomas Jefferson, John Adams vividly described the scene in Philadelphia when the French Revolutionary Wars broke out: “You certainly never felt the Ter- rorism excited by Genêt, in 1793, when ten thousand People in the Streets of Philadelphia, day after day threatened to drag Washington out of his House, and effect a Revolution in the Government, or compell it to declare War in favour of the French Revolution and against England.”1 Adams and Washington had witnessed firsthand this “terrorism” incited by Edmond Genêt, Foreign Minister from France, and it powerfully influenced their appraisal of the risks political parties and other extra-constitutional amalgamations posed to the young Republic. Just a few years after the Genêt Affair, President George Washington issued his often-quoted Farewell Address, in which he admonished the American people to avoid foreign entanglements and be wary of the “baneful effects of the spirit of party.”2 These two recommendations went hand-in-hand: political parties, in Washingtonʼsview,wouldonlycontinuetopolarizeapolitydivided by foreign war.3 The first President was particularly suspicious of the Jeffersonian Republican Party, which he believed had encouraged Francophile partisans to take up arms in support of the French revolutionary struggle against Britain and other powers. With limited resources at its disposal, his administration 1 “Adams to Thomas Jefferson, 30 June 1813” in Lester J. Cappon, ed., The Adams–Jefferson Letters. 2 vols. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1959), 2: 346–347.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditors: Market Concentration and Their Role
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on Economic Affairs 2nd Report of Session 2010–11 Auditors: Market concentration and their role Volume I: Report Ordered to be printed 15 March 2011 and published 30 March 2011 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £13.50 HL Paper 119–I Select Committee on Economic Affairs The Economic Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session with orders of reference “to consider economic affairs”. Current Membership Lord Best Lord Currie of Marylebone Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Lord Hollick Baroness Kingsmill Lord Lawson of Blaby Lord Levene of Portsoken Lord Lipsey Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market (Chairman) Lord Moonie Lord Shipley Lord Smith of Clifton Lord Tugendhat Declaration of Interests See Appendix 1. A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests Publications All publications of the Committee are available on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/hleconomicaffairs Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the Committee’s meeting are available at www.parliamentlive.tv General Information General Information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee Staff The current staff of the Committee are Bill Sinton (Clerk), Stephen Seawright (Policy Analyst) and Karen Sumner (Committee Assistant). Contact Details All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Select Committee on Economic Affairs, Committee Office, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW.
    [Show full text]
  • Were Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt the True Architects of the United Nations?
    Faculty of Arts and Philosophy Department of literary studies Were Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt the True Architects of the United Nations? Jens Vermeulen (01309561) Master of Arts in American Studies 2014-2015 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ken Kennard Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Vision of Peace and Prosperity ........................................................................................................ 6 Negotiations and Results ................................................................................................................ 19 The Creation of the United Nations: The San Francisco Conference ............................................ 34 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................... 41 1 Introduction The United Nations (UN) was founded after the Second World War by 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security. Besides collective security, it is also an environment where countries meet and develop friendly relationships. It promotes social progress and advocates for better living standards and human rights. The UN has four main purposes: to keep the peace throughout the world; to develop friendly relations
    [Show full text]
  • What Were the Aims of the 'Big Three' at the Paris Peace Conference? Interleaving
    Paper 1, Section B Conflict and Tension, 1918-1939 The Treaty of Versailles What were the aims of the 'Big Three' at the Paris Peace Conference? Interleaving . low stakes questions. 1. When was the German Empire created? P31 2. Who was the Kaiser? P31 3. What is militarism? P31 4. What did Kaiser Wilhelm want to make Germany? 5. What was Germany like before 1871? Pink box p31 Challenge 6. Why did the Kaiser dislike democracy? P31 2. Who was the Kaiser? P31 The person in charge of Germany, inherited his position and ruled like a King. 3. What is militarism? P31 The strengthening of Germany’s military eg the army and the navy and using it to increase Germany’s influence. 4. What did Kaiser Wilhelm want to make Germany? A world power. 5. What was Germany like before 1871? Pink box p31 Lots of small states. Challenge 6. Why did the Kaiser dislike democracy? P31 He thought it was weak and didn’t like working with the Reichstag. He preferred to put his trust in the army. World War One had devastated Europe economically, industrially and socially. About 8 million soldiers and 8 million civilians were dead. Towns and villages were flattened, farms were destroyed and railways had been blown up. It seemed that the world would not be the same again. At the end of the war, the leaders of the winning countries met to decide how to deal with the losing countries - this would be a huge task. The leaders of the winning countries could try to seek revenge or they could try to build a better and more peaceful world.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PARIS 1919 Study Guide About The
    PARIS 1919 Study Guide About the Film Inspired by Margaret MacMillan’s landmark book, Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed The World, this film takes viewers inside the Paris Peace Conference offering a compelling reflection on post‐WWI history and how the decisions made during those six fateful months in 1919 continue to haunt us, for better or worse. In January 1919, Paris became the centre of the world. Armistice had been declared just a few months earlier in the most devastating war of all time. Almost ten million were dead. Two empires had collapsed. The old world order lay in tatters and a new one desperately needed to be created. Driven by unprecedented urgency, delegations from over 30 nations descended upon Paris for the most ambitious peace talks in history. The French capital became the destination of emirs and presidents, newsmen and royalty, ambitious socialites and enterprising arms dealers, each with their own agenda. At the helm of the conference were the “Big Four” of the allied victors: U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau, British Prime Minister David Lloyd George and Italian Prime Minister Vittorio Orlando. They endeavoured to engineer a peace treaty for all time. While the Big Four staggered under this mind‐boggling agenda, separate committees assessed war reparations and realigned national borders, forming new countries such as Iraq and Yugoslavia with little chance for reflection. Meanwhile, the streets were teeming with starving widows and war amputees – and Germany was rearming. In viewing Paris 1919 audiences will gain insight into the monumental task that lay before the Big Four and their diplomatic teams, the lasting legacies that were accomplished in the peace settlement, and the inherent weaknesses of the Paris Peace Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday August 22, 1996
    8±22±96 Thursday Vol. 61 No. 164 August 22, 1996 Pages 43301±43410 Briefings on How To Use the Federal Register For information on briefings in New York, NY and Washington, DC, see announcement on the inside cover of this issue. federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 164 / Thursday, August 22, 1996 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), by General online information 202±512±1530 the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Single copies/back copies: Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the Paper or fiche 512±1800 regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC FEDERAL AGENCIES 20402. Subscriptions: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 523±5243 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 523±5243 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and For other telephone numbers, see the Reader Aids section Executive Orders and Federal agency documents having general applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published at the end of this issue. by act of Congress and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless FEDERAL REGISTER WORKSHOP earlier filing is requested by the issuing agency.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II
    ADDRESSES UPON THE AMERICAN ROAD BY Herbert Hoover World War II 1941-1945 NEW YORK D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY, INC. 25O FOURTH AVENUE 1946 COPYRIGHT, 1946 BY D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY, INC. All Rights Reserved This book, or any parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without written permission from the author and the publishers. PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents PART I: MAKING PEACE DECLARATION OF WAR 3 [Press Statement, New York City, December 8, 1941] FINLAND 4 [Press Statement, New York City, November 4, 1941] THE APPROACHES TO PEACE 5 [Executives' Club and other Clubs, Chicago, Illinois, December 16, 1943] FURTHER NEW APPROACHES TO LASTING PEACE 14 [Jointly with Hugh Gibson—Articles appearing in Collier's, May-June, 1943] ON PRIME MINISTER CHURCHILL'S ADDRESS 56 [Jointly with Hugh Gibson – Press Statement, New York City, March 22, 1943] AN APPROACH TO A LASTING PEACE 57 [Jointly with Hugh Gibson – The New York Times Magazine, New York City, April 4, 1943] v HISTORY'S GREATEST MURDER TRIAL 64 [Jointly with Hugh Gibson – This Week Magazine, New York City, August 29, 1943] NEW APPROACHES TO PEACE 71 [Joint Session of the St. Paul-Minneapolis branches of the Foreign Policy Association and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September 3, 1943] THE TRANSITION TO LASTING PEACE 85 [Kansas City, Missouri, October 28, 1943] THE FUTILITY OF MILITARY ALLIANCES 97 [Jointly with Hugh Gibson—Collier's, November 6, 1943] ON FINNISH QUESTION 108 [Press Statement, New York City, March 25, 1944] GOOD NEIGHBOR POLICY 110 [Press Statement, New York City, December 8, 1943] SOME ADDITIONS TO THE DUMBARTON OAKS PROPOSALS 111 [Four Articles appearing in press, March 25-28, 1945] THE SAN FRANCISCO CONFERENCE AND PEACE 124 [Foreign Policy Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 17, 1945] vi THE SAN FRANCISCO CHARTER AND THE PROGRESS TOWARD ENDURING PEACE 137 [San Francisco, California, July l8, 1945] PART II: ORGANIZATION OF THE HOME FRONT ORGANIZATION OF WAR ECONOMIC CONTROLS 147 [Senate Committee on Banking and Currency – Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodrow Wilson and “Peace Without Victory”: Interpreting the Reversal of 1917
    Woodrow Wilson and “Peace without Victory”: Interpreting the Reversal of 1917 John A. Thompson In a speech to the Senate on January 22, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson called for the European war to be brought to an end through “a peace without victory.” This, he argued, was the only sort of peace that could produce a lasting settlement: Victory would mean peace forced upon the loser, a victor’s terms imposed upon the vanquished. It would be accepted in humiliation, under duress, at an intolerable sacrifice, and would leave a sting, a resentment, a bitter memory President Woodrow Wilson upon which the terms of peace would rest, not permanently, but only as upon quicksand. 1 Wilson went on to outline what he saw as the other “essential” elements of a lasting peace. Such a settlement would need to be based on such principles “as that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed and that no right anywhere exists to hand peoples about from sovereignty to sovereignty as if they were property,” recognition of the rights of small nations, freedom of the seas, and limitation of armaments on both land and sea. Above all, it required that the settlement be underwritten “by the guarantees of a universal covenant,” that it be “a peace made secure by the organized major force of mankind.” 2 John A. Thompson is emeritus reader in American History and an emeritus fellow of St Catharine’s College, University of Cambridge. He thanks Ross A. Kennedy for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
    [Show full text]