International Women's Day/4-S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lithuanian Writers and the Establishment During Late Socialism: the Writers Union As a Place for Conformism Or Escape Vilius Ivanauskas
LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 15 2010 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 51–78 LITHUANIAN WRITERS AND THE EStabLISHMENT DURING LatE SOCIALISM: THE WRITERS UNION AS A PLACE FOR CONFORMISM OR ESCAPE Vilius Ivanauskas ABSTRACT This article analyses how the changes in the dominant attitude of local Soviet writers were encouraged, screened or restricted by the Writers Union [WU] through mechanisms of planning, control and even through measures of creating a secure daily environment. The author looks at the tensions and conflicts between writers of different generations, observing less ideology in the younger generation than in their predecessors since the development and dissemination of national images among the declared values of communism were increasing. The union as a system covered both aspects – conformism and the escape (manoeuvre). Though the WU had a strong mechanism of control, it managed to ensure for the writers such a model of adaptation where even those, who were subject to restrictions, had a possibility of remaining within the official structure, through certain compromises, while actually avoiding involvement in dissident activities or samizdat publishing. Introduction In August 1940 a group of Lithuanian intellectuals, most of whom were writers, went off to Moscow “to bring back Stalin’s Sunshine”, at the same time asking for Lithuania to be incorporated into the USSR. Forty eight years later in early June 1988 a few members of the local literary elite joined the initial Sąjūdis Group and from thenceforth stood in the vanguard of the National Revival. These two historic moments, witnessing two contrary breaking points in history, when Lithuanian writers were active participants in events, naturally give rise to the question of how the status and role of writers and their relationship with the Soviet regime changed. -
Conde, Jonathan (2018) an Examination of Lithuania's Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation
Conde, Jonathan (2018) An Examination of Lithuania’s Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation. Masters thesis, York St John University. Downloaded from: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/3522/ Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form. Copyright of the items stored in RaY reside with the authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full text items free of charge, and may download a copy for private study or non-commercial research. For further reuse terms, see licence terms governing individual outputs. Institutional Repository Policy Statement RaY Research at the University of York St John For more information please contact RaY at [email protected] An Examination of Lithuania’s Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation. Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Research MA History at York St John University School of Humanities, Religion & Philosophy by Jonathan William Conde Student Number: 090002177 April 2018 I confirm that the work submitted is my own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the works of others. This copy has been submitted on the understanding that it is copyright material. Any reuse must comply with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and any licence under which this copy is released. @2018 York St John University and Jonathan William Conde The right of Jonathan William Conde to be identified as the Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Acknowledgments My gratitude for assisting with this project must go to my wife, her parents, wider family, and friends in Lithuania, and all the people of interest who I interviewed between the autumn of 2014 and winter 2017. -
JEWISH HISTORICAL NOTES /7 / R/Zrn /F L/Siinr B Hi Cfrwi/^Stl 4 C Cr\Ri N F 1 Rtti CONTENTS
RHODE ISLAND JEWISH HISTORICAL NOTES /7 / r/zrn /f l/siinr b Hi cfrwi/^stl 4 c cr\ri n f 1 rtti CONTENTS Cover—Solomon Pareira first Jewish settler in Providence (1838), first President of the Congregation of the Sons of Israel and donor of the first and only Jewish cemetery in Providence. From a crayon portrait by his granddaughter. Preface—Rabbi William G. Braucle, Ph.I) 3 Introduction—Beryl Segal 4 Remarks—David C. Adelman, Esq 5 Jews in the Court Records of Providence (1739-1860) David C. Adelman, Esq 8 Naturalizations—David C. Adelman, Esq II U. S. Court to 1906 12 State Court to 1905 . 54 Jewish Community 1877, David C. Aclelman, Escj 72 Financial Report 75 Membership List 76 Rhode Island Jewish Historical Notes PREFACE In what way does the story of the Jew in America differ from the story of the Jew in other lands? In one important respect. In America, unlike other lands, the Jew was present at the very beginning of things. An Asser Levy in New Amsterdam, a Mordecai Campanall in Rhode Island, an Adolph Sutro arriving in a covered wagon in San Francisco. The number involved is not important. It is important that the Jew was there. It is important that he must be counted as one of the melange of peoples who began the building of America. In Providence, 1854 marks a dual anniversary: Lhe centennial of the first Jewish congregation in Providence and the Tercentenary of Jews in the United States. We observe these events—in part, at least— in order to remind our neighbors of our early presence in this land; and to remind ourselves that religious concernments stimulated the first organized endeavor by Jews in this land—whether it was a syna- gogue, an all-clay school or a cemetery, the concernment was religious. -
2010 Annual Report
2010 Annual Report INCLUDESSPECIALPHOTORETROSPECTIVE CONTACT US AT: NCSJ 2020 K Street NW, Suite 7800 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 898-2500 (202) 898-0822 fax Email: [email protected] Web: www.ncsj.org © 2011 NCSJ. All rights reserved. All photographs are from the archives of NCSJ except where otherwise credited. Front cover: Top row, center, and third row, left-hand side, photos by Ron Sachs/CNP. Back cover: Map © David Swanson/Equator Graphics, Inc. Contents Mission and Background Interview with the Chairman of the Board of Governors .................................................2 From the President . .3 From the Executive Director .......................................................5 Programs and Activities ..............................................6 Highlights of the Year ..................................................7 SPECIAL PHOTO RETROSPECTIVE: 40 YEARS OF HISTORY ....................................................9 Celebrating 40 Years of History Rallies and Protests Activists and Prisoners of Zion Meetings . .15 Jewish Life Reborn .............................16 . .18 .........................................20 Board of Governors Meetings ...............................22 Financial Statement ...........................................24 Donors and Program Funders ....................................................26 ..........................................27 NCSJ Annual Report for 2010 1 Mission and Background MISSION To empower and ensure the security of Jews in the 15 successor states of the former Soviet Union -
The Baltic States
SAULIUS GRYBKAUSKAS – VLADAS SIRUTAVIČIUS The Baltic States Cultural opposition: Controversies of the Concept Several problems arise when discussing the historiography of cultural opposi- tion in the Baltic States First, and most importantly, Baltic academics and histo- rians have not offered any clear scientific definition of what constitutes cultural opposition. As a result, we are left to consider what the concept of cultural op- position does not mean. In our view, this unclear definition is the product of various factors. As the three Baltic states each fought for and won state inde- pendence, historians from these nations have dedicated most of their attention to discussions of the armed resistance, the operation of Soviet repressive struc- tures and the repression of peaceful civilians. The selection of these themes as research topics can be explained by the fact that such subjects were off limits during the Soviet period, and academics were to conduct academic research according to the prevailing ideological and political parameters. In addition, in the post-Soviet scholarly environment, the positions of various social groups and individuals were described in a simplistic way, with the help of three sche- matic categories: collaborators who expressed active support for the Soviet re- gime; the freedom fighters, who are usually identified with the armed resist- ance movement; and conformists, who have received limited attention thus far. Research agendas were also heavily influenced by the Cold War totalitarian paradigm that postulated that Soviet-type political regimes in Eastern Europe were all monolithic and totalitarian, and there were only minor and insignifi- cant differences between them. -
The Political and Social Consequences of Romas Kalanta's
A Death Transformed: The Political and Social Consequences of Romas Kalanta’s Self Immolation, Soviet Lithuania, 1972 Amanda Jeanne Swain A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Glennys Young, Chair James Felak Guntis Smidchens Program Authorized to Offer Degree: History © Copyright 2013 Amanda Jeanne Swain University of Washington Abstract A Death Transformed: The Political and Social Consequences of Romas Kalanta’s Self Immolation, Soviet Lithuania, 1972 Amanda Jeanne Swain Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Glennys Young History “A Death Transformed: The Political and Social Consequences of Romas Kalanta’s Self- Immolation, Soviet Lithuania, 1972” explores Soviet and post-Soviet interpretive narratives and political practices in response to two days of street demonstrations that followed the 1972 suicide of a nineteen-year-old man in Soviet Lithuania. My analysis reveals that Communist authorities and participating youth viewed the demonstrations as a struggle over the acceptable boundaries and content of modern Soviet youth culture. Despite extensive evidence that by 1972 youth were actively negotiating the boundaries of what were acceptable activities, Communist authorities and young people operated within an ideological framework that denied young people’s capacity to express discontent with the Soviet system. In post-Communist Lithuania, social and political elites constructed narratives of May 1972 that reclaimed agency by representing the demonstrations alternatively as nationalist dissent, civil resistance or Sixties-style youth protest. The diversity of narratives reflected on-going debates about the nature of post-Communist Lithuanian identity. This work seeks to make significant contributions to the historiography of the Soviet Union and to scholarship on the politics of memory and European integration. -