Quidditas Volume 20 Article 3 1999 Inventing the Wicked Women of Tudor England: Alice More, Anne Boleyn, and Anne Stanhope Retha M. Warnicke Arizona State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Warnicke, Retha M. (1999) "Inventing the Wicked Women of Tudor England: Alice More, Anne Boleyn, and Anne Stanhope," Quidditas: Vol. 20 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol20/iss1/3 This Special Gathering is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected]. Inventing the Wicked Women of Tudor England: Alice More, Anne Boleyn, and Anne Stanhope Retha M. Warnicke Arizona State University n Tudor histories, perhaps more than in other histories, writers have failed to distinguish, as Judith Shapiro has pointed out with reference Ito anthropological literature, “consistently between the sex bias ema- nating from the observer and the sex bias characteristic of the community under study.”1 The sex and gender bias of early modern society was, of course, pervasive and ubiquitous. Prescriptive works instructed women to confine their activities to domestic and family matters. Even as litigators in the courts of law, they were disadvantaged.2 Generally defining women as the inferior sex, their male contemporaries judged women’s worth by their chastity, silence, piety, obedience, and household efficiency and accused them of being garrulous, materialistic, and driven by lustful intentions.