LIMUN 2018 Crisis Study Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LIMUN 2018 Crisis Study Guide LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018 1! LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018 Table of Contents Introduction Letter 3 Introduction to the Joint Cabinet Crisis 5 1937: The Crossroads of Diplomacy 8 Introduction: Understanding the Crisis behind Appeasement 8 The Political Economy of Europe 9 Timeline: The Rise of Nazism in Germany 13 Timeline: The Rise of Fascism in Italy 14 The United Kingdom 15 Economy and Trade 15 Treaties 18 Overview of Early 20th Century British History & Politics 18 Britain in the First World War 21 Italy 23 The Italian peninsula 23 A modern struggle for unity 23 Italy in the 20th century 25 Economy and Trade 26 Role in WWI and Treaties 29 France 33 History and Politics 33 Economy and Trade 35 Foreign Policy and Treaties 39 The League of Nations 43 History and Formation 43 The League of Nations in the Interwar Crisis 46 Current Challenges 48 Sources 51 Joint Cabinet Crisis London International Model United Nations 19th Session | 2018 2! LONDONLONDON INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL MODELMODEL UNITEDUNITED NATIONSNATIONS 20182018 Introduction Letter Dear Delegates, I would like to warmly welcome you to our Joint Cabinet Crisis committee which will be based on the Appeasement Years from May 1937. This Crisis is designed for both beginner and advanced delegates, whether you are a committed Crisis delegate or someone who prefers General Assembly debate and are interested in a new experience. You are all part of an ambitious project to simulate one of the most critical points of history in the Interwar period, not only to experience the issues European powers faced comprehensively but also to work towards alternatives which could potentially prevent the Second World War. The focus of this Crisis committee is to enable bring out the best in the Model United Nations experience through a combination of Crisis and General Assembly procedure; putting the Resolution into practice. While the League of Nations faced great power struggles and lack of implementation of its beliefs, delegates will face the same challenge the predecessor institution of the United Nations did – war. While 3! LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018 diplomacy is used as a mechanism to prevent conflict, this Crisis will also evaluate how leaders and ambassadors operate throughout numerous conflicts across Europe, such as that of the Spanish Civil War. We ask each and every delegate to challenge themselves in this new experience that is our historical journey, for we will surely challenge every cabinet and the League of Nations in approaching domestic and transnational crises. While it is surely not the inception of global diplomacy despite the first time many smaller countries are represented on such a scale, the consequences of this period will define the 20th century in trade, military capabilities and ultimately, the Western historical narrative of the origins of the Second World War. We look forward to meeting you all at LIMUN 2018 and this Study Guide proves useful in understanding our topic for this simulation. Yours Sincerely, Hamzah Sheikh (Crisis Director) Roberta Maggi and Muqqaddam Malik (Assistant Directors) 4! LONDONLONDON INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL MODELMODEL UNITEDUNITED NATIONSNATIONS 20182018 Introduction to the Joint Cabinet Crisis This crisis is based on the diplomatic crossroads of a continent that struggled with the long-term effects of the global crises of the Great Depression and the First World War. It is also known as the Appeasement Years in which the Great Powers failed to prevent Hitler’s regime from advancing on Eastern Europe, before Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain declared war on Germany for invoking their agreement that promised to keep Poland independent from Nazi control. While a century-old debate exists on whether the British should have intervened earlier to prevent the Second World War, the arguments between orthodox and revisionist perspectives as well as numerous counterfactual theories will be put to the test in this Crisis Committee. The starting point in this setting will be the 28th May 1937, the day Chamberlain assumed leadership over a new, National Government of the United Kingdom. This Crisis will be an opportunity for all delegates to engage with the underlying factors behind the process that began WW2. With the countries of Britain, France and Italy present as Cabinets along with the diplomatic body of the League of Nations, leaders, politicians and ambassadors are tasked to determine the direction of what 5! LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018 could have happened differently. It is hindsight that will provide the challenge for all delegates in hopes of advancing the interests of their country populations, whether it is Britain’s intention to maintain its global empire, Italy’s aspiration to dominate the Mediterranean, France’s drive to advance its Republic or the League of Nations chance to overcome its history of failure to provide a diplomatic solution to global crisis. It is strongly recommended both advanced and beginner delegates read the Crisis guides available on the LIMUN website (https://limun.org.uk/help_guides) to become more informed on Rules of Procedure, what to expect in crisis committees and how to engage with all mechanics of the simulation. Messages, news updates and directives will be facilitated by Deus Crisis Platform, a system created by crisis experts that has improved the operation of Crisis Committees and all delegates will be given a tutorial on how to use it on the first day of committee session. Roles and Responsibilities Delegates have all been given roles that entail a character’s history, position of power and objectives in the simulation. It is important that every delegate learns and researches their character in order to understand what they are capable of when submitting directives, along with acknowledging the history, allegiances and limitations of that of their character in May 1937. Simply having the ability to take certain action comes with consequences for a character and has to be realistic, especially within the framework of a historical crisis. All characters are not immortal and could possibly endure travel logistics, political scandal and conspiracy and assassination. Death will not be as frequent as it was in the trenches of the First World War, however in the case it will happen, it will be monumental in determining character and country relations, shifts in power and change in public opinion, all variables for each delegate to consider when submitting directives. The Crisis Team will be responsible for personally responding to your directives by updating the news and simulated countries and characters that are not represented by 6! LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018 Chairs or delegates. When engaging with this simulation of historical events, we ask you consider the culture and technology of society at the time when submitting directives and evaluating the effects. This is a particular stage of globalisation where despite rapid development of science and industry radically changing the behaviour of countries within the span of decades, it is still far from the standard of accessibility we have today and therefore this needs to be considered in this ‘alternate reality’ we will provide for you in the committee. The same applies to how government institutions choose to operate and how news is reported and delivered to mass audiences, as well as the numerous advantages of air power and sound technology, practicality correlating with innovation. Crisis Chairs will assume characters that were leaders of the countries represented as cabinets. Chairs will act with their own interests and that of the Crisis Team, however will be excluded on most information limited to what their character realistically has access to throughout the period. They will assert the agenda on the first day of committee session, assisting you in understanding and engaging the crisis simulation and guiding everyone to reach the objectives of their respective cabinets. Their prime objective is to lead the cabinet and every delegate’s progress, even if it creates clashes with the motives and methods of another character including their own. 7! LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018 1937: The Crossroads of Diplomacy Introduction: Understanding the Crisis behind Appeasement The consolidation of power from both Nazi and Fascist leaders had posed issues for the League of Nations. Not only did Hitler withdraw from the League in October 1933 but he also introduced two-year conscription and the development of the German air force, which was not only a violation of the Treaty of Versailles but also a threat to Chamberlain, who as Chancellor, had always prioritised funding for power in the skies over the Royal Navy. A militaristic Germany was a threat to Central and Eastern Europe and its goals to expand territorial interests in connection to German domination of Jews and Slavs alarmed its neighbours. In March 1936, the Nazis established control and remilitarised the Rhineland while Europe focused on Mussolini’s conquest for the Mediterranean in hopes of reviving Italy’s symbolic history of the Roman Empire with the goal of invading Abyssinia, which he succeeded in doing despite Emperor Haile Selassie’s protest to the League of Nations (Best, 2008, 162-165). The Appeasement policy was not only limited to the British Empire. Italy had entertained diplomatic treaties from the Locarno powers, where Mussolini wanted to prevent Hitler from becoming an enemy in anticipation of German troops in Austria. However, when Mussolini moved towards Abyssinia, he was met with sanctions from the League before he eventually succeeded in securing his invasion in 1936. Hitler 8! LONDON INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018 offered neutrality to Italy, which in turn gave the Germans a free-hand to work with Austrian fascists while both countries supported Franco’s nationalist regime in the Spanish Civil War. While Europe was gripped in crisis, both the British and the French were reluctant to start another war.
Recommended publications
  • Summary 7 (2017)
    Japan Border Review, No.Summary 7 (2017) Summary Austria-Hungary’s Ultimatum of 23 July 1914 Reconsidered: The Background of Vienna’s Decision-Making in the Memorandum of Friedrich von Wiesner MURAKAMI Ryo The immediate cause of the First World War was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo on 28 June 1914. Gavrilo Princip, who killed Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie, was a Serbian nationalist and a member of the Black Hand Society. The Austrian government thought that Serbia was behind the affair. In its response, Vienna sought to settle its decade-long dispute with Serbia. On 23 July 1914, the Austrian government gave an ultimatum to the Serbian government. Many researchers argue that Austria deliberately made demands that it knew Serbia could not accept. Furthermore, it is often indicated that Vienna’s ultimatum was not aimed at the Black Hand Society, but at the National Defense (in Serbian, Narodna Odbrana). Many researchers have carried out research into the diplomatic crisis (the so-called July Crisis) between the assassination at Sarajevo and the British declaration of war against Germany. Although Vienna’s declaration of war caused a chain reaction in Europe, historiographic studies still do not pay sufficient attention to either the process that led to the ultimatum, or to the Austrian justification for war against Serbia. In this article, I point out the importance of Friedrich von Wiesner, adviser on international law at the Austrian foreign ministry, during the July Crisis in Vienna. He participated by drawing up the ultimatum and he wrote the document (a memorandum) detailing charges against Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • When Fear Is Substituted for Reason: European and Western Government Policies Regarding National Security 1789-1919
    WHEN FEAR IS SUBSTITUTED FOR REASON: EUROPEAN AND WESTERN GOVERNMENT POLICIES REGARDING NATIONAL SECURITY 1789-1919 Norma Lisa Flores A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2012 Committee: Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Dr. Mark Simon Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Michael Brooks Dr. Geoff Howes Dr. Michael Jakobson © 2012 Norma Lisa Flores All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Although the twentieth century is perceived as the era of international wars and revolutions, the basis of these proceedings are actually rooted in the events of the nineteenth century. When anything that challenged the authority of the state – concepts based on enlightenment, immigration, or socialism – were deemed to be a threat to the status quo and immediately eliminated by way of legal restrictions. Once the façade of the Old World was completely severed following the Great War, nations in Europe and throughout the West started to revive various nineteenth century laws in an attempt to suppress the outbreak of radicalism that preceded the 1919 revolutions. What this dissertation offers is an extended understanding of how nineteenth century government policies toward radicalism fostered an environment of increased national security during Germany’s 1919 Spartacist Uprising and the 1919/1920 Palmer Raids in the United States. Using the French Revolution as a starting point, this study allows the reader the opportunity to put events like the 1848 revolutions, the rise of the First and Second Internationals, political fallouts, nineteenth century imperialism, nativism, Social Darwinism, and movements for self-government into a broader historical context.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • When Diplomats Fail: Aostrian and Rossian Reporting from Belgrade, 1914
    WHEN DIPLOMATS FAIL: AOSTRIAN AND ROSSIAN REPORTING FROM BELGRADE, 1914 Barbara Jelavich The mountain of books written on the origins of the First World War have produced no agreement on the basic causes of this European tragedy. Their division of opinion reflects the situation that existed in June and July 1914, when the principal statesmen involved judged the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Habsburg throne, and its consequences from radically different perspectives. Their basic misunderstanding of the interests and viewpoints 'of the opposing sides contributed strongly to the initiation of hostilities. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of diplomatic reporting, particularly in the century before 1914 when ambassadors were men of influence and when their dispatches were read by those who made the final decisions in foreign policy. European diplomats often held strong opinions and were sometimes influenced by passions and. prejudices, but nevertheless throughout the century their activities contributed to assuring that this period would, with obvious exceptions, be an era of peace in continental affairs. In major crises the crucial decisions are always made by a very limited number of people no matter what the political system. Usually a head of state -- whether king, emperor, dictator, or president, together with those whom he chooses to consult, or a strong political leader with his advisers-­ -decides on the course of action. Obviously, in times of international tension these men need accurate information not only from their military staffs on the state of their and their opponent's armed forces and the strategic position of the country, but also expert reporting from their representatives abroad on the exact issues at stake and the attitudes of the other governments, including their immediate concerns and their historical background.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrich Berber and the Politics of International Law in Germany and India, 1920S-1960S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online K. Rietzler Journal of Global History, 11.1 (2016) Counter-Imperial Orientalism: Friedrich Berber and the Politics of International Law in Germany and India, 1920s-1960s Katharina Rietzler1 This is the peer reviewed, accepted manuscript of an article which will be published in final form in the Journal of Global History, Vol. 11.1 (March 2016), doi:10.1017/S1740022815000303 Abstract: The most trenchant critiques of Western international law are framed around the legacy of its historic complicity in the imperial project of governing non-European peoples. International law organised Europe and its ‘others’ into a hierarchy of civilizational difference that was only ever reconfigured but never overturned. But when analysing the complex relationship between international law and imperialism the differences within Europe—as opposed to a dyadic opposition of Europe versus the ‘rest'—also matter. Within the historical and political constellations of the early and mid-twentieth century, German difference produced a set of arguments that challenged dominant discourses of international law by posturing as anti- imperial critique. This article focuses on the global career of Friedrich Berber (1898-1984) who, as a legal adviser in Nazi Germany and Nehru’s India, was at the forefront of state-led challenges to liberal international law. Berber fused notions of German civilizational superiority with an appropriation of Indian colonial victimhood, and pursued a shared politics of opposition. He embodies a version of German-Indian entanglement which did not abate after the Second World War, emphasizing the long continuities of empire, power differentials, civilizational hierarchies and developmental logics under the umbrella of international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Disarmament Conference 1932-1933 Orange Rows: Abyssinia Crisis 1935
    Key: Blue rows: Manchuria 1931 Green rows: Disarmament Conference 1932-1933 Orange rows: Abyssinia Crisis 1935 Date Event Significance September 1931 Japanese Army claims Chinese troops sabotaged the “Plausible” reason to invade: in self-defence, not invasion per se railway (belonging to the Japanese), invaded Manchuria and expelled Chinese troops February 1932 Creation of the puppet state of Manchukuo, with Henry Pu “Puppet State” meant that the League of Nations could not Yi installed as the emperor directly accuse the Japanese of taking over Manchuria, since it is technically an independent state July 1932 Germany proposes option of allowing Germany to rearm to Shows that other countries did not see Germany as an equal, but the level of other powers in the Disarmament Conference. as a defeated nation Proposal rejected, Germany walks Late 1932 Japanese Imperial Army attached Shanghai with warplanes - and gunships, ignored civilian government’s instructions to withdraw. China appealed to the League to take action (banking on idea of collective security) September 1932 LoN officials present report after field trip; Japan was to - withdraw from Manchuria December 1932 Agreement to treat Germany equally Indecisiveness of League: took 5 months just to decide to treat Germany as an equal January 1933 Germany returns to the Conferences - February 1933 Hitler becomes Chancellor (quite obvious, no?) February 1933 Japan announced further expansion plans in China - 24 February 1933 League votes 42:1 on the subject (with the one being Japan, Illustrated
    [Show full text]
  • Black Internationalism and African and Caribbean
    BLACK INTERNATIONALISM AND AFRICAN AND CARIBBEAN INTELLECTUALS IN LONDON, 1919-1950 By MARC MATERA A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Professor Bonnie G. Smith And approved by _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2008 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Black Internationalism and African and Caribbean Intellectuals in London, 1919-1950 By MARC MATERA Dissertation Director: Bonnie G. Smith During the three decades between the end of World War I and 1950, African and West Indian scholars, professionals, university students, artists, and political activists in London forged new conceptions of community, reshaped public debates about the nature and goals of British colonialism, and prepared the way for a revolutionary and self-consciously modern African culture. Black intellectuals formed organizations that became homes away from home and centers of cultural mixture and intellectual debate, and launched publications that served as new means of voicing social commentary and political dissent. These black associations developed within an atmosphere characterized by a variety of internationalisms, including pan-ethnic movements, feminism, communism, and the socialist internationalism ascendant within the British Left after World War I. The intellectual and political context of London and the types of sociability that these groups fostered gave rise to a range of black internationalist activity and new regional imaginaries in the form of a West Indian Federation and a United West Africa that shaped the goals of anticolonialism before 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Rijeka 2020, European Capital of Culture, Candidate City.Pdf
    Rijeka 2020 ECOC Candidate City BID Book 1. naziv cijeline 1 Rijeka 2020 ECOC Candidate City Port of Diversity Nešto → 2 ⁄ Bid Book Rijeka 2020 ECOC Candidate City 0. Introduction— General considerations p. 6 1. Contribution to long-term strategy p. 17 2. European dimension p. 27 3. Cultural & artistic content p. 32 4. Capacity to deliver p. 42 5. Outreach p. 52 6. Management p. 58 a— Finance p. 58 b— Organisational structure p. 62 c— Contingency planning p. 65 d— Marketing & communication p. 66 7. Additional information p. 73 ← Courtesy of: Benčić Youth Council, 2013 → A barren, uninhabited island that was the site of a political prison in the former Yugoslavia Photographs from the archives of the City of Rijeka, 2013 → ⁄ Port of Diversity Rijeka 2020 ECOC Candidate City Rijeka 2020 ECOC Candidate City BID Book ⁄ 3 Rijeka 2020 ECOC Candidate City Port of Diversity ⁄ → 4 ⁄ Bid Book Rijeka 2020 ECOC Candidate City DEAR JURY, DEAR READER The City of Rijeka announces its candidacy for the Euro- The Primorje and Gorski Kotar County, the City of Opatija pean Capital of Culture 2020 at the time when the City, and the University of Rijeka, as political, strategic and op- region and Europe are faced with numerous crises: eco- erational project partners, give mandate to Rijeka's can- nomic, political, social and moral. This is as well the mo- didacy for the title. By jointly executing the agreement, ment when distinctive voices can be heard emphasizing we mutually agreed to undertake the responsibility of the critical role of culture for sustainable community conducting and developing concrete cultural activities in growth, its cohesion and economic development, but line with the vision and programme of Rijeka ECoC 2020 also warning of perils of instrumentalisation of culture with municipalities and cities on the County's territory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buildup of the German War Economy: the Importance of the Nazi-Soviet Economic Agreements of 1939 and 1940 by Samantha Carl I
    The Buildup of the German War Economy: The Importance of the Nazi-Soviet Economic Agreements of 1939 and 1940 By Samantha Carl INTRODUCTION German-Soviet relations in the early half of the twentieth century have been marked by periods of rapprochement followed by increasing tensions. After World War I, where the nations fought on opposite sides, Germany and the Soviet Union focused on their respective domestic problems and tensions began to ease. During the 1920s, Germany and the Soviet Union moved toward normal relations with the signing of the Treaty of Rapallo in 1922.(1) Tensions were once again apparent after 1933, when Adolf Hitler gained power in Germany. Using propaganda and anti-Bolshevik rhetoric, Hitler depicted the Soviet Union as Germany's true enemy.(2) Despite the animosity between the two nations, the benefits of trade enabled them to maintain economic relations throughout the inter-war period. It was this very relationship that paved the way for the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939 and the subsequent outbreak of World War II. Nazi-Soviet relations on the eve of the war were vital to the war movement of each respective nation. In essence, the conclusion of the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact on August 23, 1939 allowed Germany to augment its war effort while diminishing the Soviet fear of a German invasion.(3) The betterment of relations was a carefully planned program in which Hitler sought to achieve two important goals. First, he sought to prevent a two-front war from developing upon the invasion of Poland. Second, he sought to gain valuable raw materials that were necessary for the war movement.(4) The only way to meet these goals was to pursue the completion of two pacts with the Soviet Union: an economic agreement as well as a political one.
    [Show full text]
  • Tionsrijeka – Candidate City for European Capital of Culture
    Rijeka 2� 2� : Port of DiveR sity—Wa teR woR k migra Rijeka – Candidate City for European tions Capital of Culture Table of contents Warm welcome to this important publication 0. Introduction – general considerations 2 The opportunity for Rijeka to compete in the final round for the title of European Capi- tal of Culture has given us great pleasure. The first step was to fully understand the 1. contribution to the long-term strategy 9 We have achieved good alignment between the existing clear and sustainable strategy of Rijeka and the boost it is given by a project such as ECOC and its 2. european dimension 17 Naturally it was very stimulating to coalesce with more than hundred international part- ners in developing and structuring of great 3. cultural & artistic content 21 that is not only a collection of serious artistic pro- ductions and projects but also a broader take on the totality of human condition. Deep underlying concept of Port of Diversity was translated to topics of Work, Water and Migrations and a number of great initia- tives. The ambitious programme will be a test for our 4. capacity to deliver 73 but we are confident that the heterogeneous cul- tural scene of Rijeka – fully supported by the City Council – will prove again it's seriousness and stamina. Existing and new infrastructures will host cultural programmes that are not merely there to be adored but are ushering a new era of 5. outreach 80 that is extended to dimensions of learning and participation. We are preparing a genuinely inclusive and invigorating set of frameworks and platforms that will change the way in which each citizen and visitor of Rijeka sees her or his own partici- pation in the public sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The League of Nations in the 1930S
    The League of Nations in the 1930s This is a transcript of The League of Nations in the 1930s podcast from www.mrallsophistory.com While my last podcast considered the League of Nations in the 1920s, we could argue that the League’s problems and ultimate failure in the 1930s stems from the last major world event of the 20s. Due to the Wall Street crash, the world was plunged into huge economic depression which ultimately led to strained relations between countries as they tried to survive at all costs. While the 1920s saw presented a mix of both success and failure for the League of Nations, the 1930s arguably saw its complete collapse. The first failure of the League in the 1930s was a dispute over the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. In an attempt to overcome the effects of the worldwide depression, Japan took over this area of China after claiming Chinese aggression against their railway there. In response, China asked the League of Nations for help, as specified in the Covenant of the League. The first problem with the League’s response to Manchuria was that it took their representative, Lord Lytton, over a year to reach a judgement. This delay showed their inefficiency at responding to crises, and when they finally did reach a judgement in February 1933 by ordering Japan to leave Manchuria the Japanese refused. As a result of not liking the decision, Japan left the League instead and stayed in Manchuria! The League was left in a precarious situation. Britain and France, the leading powers within the League, were reluctant to impose trade sanctions or even a ban on weapons for fear of further damaging their own economies by losing valuable trade.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORIAL MEDAL of the RIJEKA EXPEDITION (Medaglia
    Prister: Spomen-medalja ekspedicije u Rijeku Num. vijesti, broj 72., Zagreb, 2019. SUMMARY MEMORIAL MEDAL OF THE RIJEKA EXPEDITION (Medaglia commemorativa della spedizione di Fiume) The Croatian Sabor (parliament) broke off state links with the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy on 29 October 1918. On that day the Croatian National Council in Rijeka received the order from Zagreb to take over rule in the city. Dr Rikard Lenac (1869- 1943) was appointed Governor of Rijeka, but this did not resolve the situation. The newly-created State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs, founded on 29 October 1918, could not defend Croatia’s rule in Rijeka. Conflict broke out between Croatia and Italy, and to prevent it the Joint Allied Command was established on 3 November 1918. The regular Italian army was also part of the international forces, and this showed itself decisive for the further fate of the city. On 16 November 1918, units of the Italian army broke into the Governor’s Palace, evicted Dr Rikard Lenac from it, took over Rijeka and occupied Sušak. A serious dispute broke out among the Allies because of Rijeka, and the situation in the city was at boiling point because in the spring of 1919 almost twenty thousand armed Italians were stationed there, and also several battalions of British, French and American soldiers. Under international pressure, the Italian National Council was disbanded and the members of the Rijeka Legion were banished from the city. On 27 August 1919, the First Regiment of Sardinian Grenadiers also had to leave Rijeka. This military unit was transferred to Ronchi near Trieste.
    [Show full text]