The World War Two Allied Economic Warfare: the Case of Turkish Chrome Sales

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The World War Two Allied Economic Warfare: the Case of Turkish Chrome Sales The World War Two Allied Economic Warfare: The Case of Turkish Chrome Sales Inaugural-Dissertation in der Philosophischen Fakultät und Fachbereich Theologie der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg Vorgelegt von Murat Önsoy Aus der Türkei D29 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15 April 2009 Dekan: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Jens Kulenkampff. Erstgutachter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Thomas Philipp Zweitgutachter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Şefik Alp Bahadır ACKNOWLEDGMENTS An interesting coincidence took place in the first year of my PhD study, I would like to share it here. Soon after I moved to Erlangen, I started thinking over my PhD thesis topic. I was searching for an appropriate subject. Turkish Chrome Sales was one of the few topics that I had in my mind. One day, I went to my Doktorvater Prof. Thomas Philipp’s office and discussed the topics with him. We decided to postpone the decision a few days while I wanted to consider the topics one last time and do the final elimination. Afterwards I went to the cafeteria of the Friedrich Alexander University to have lunch. After the lunch, just before I left the cafeteria building, I recognized somebody speaking Turkish and reflexively turned around. He was a Turkish guest worker with a large thick moustache; I paid attention to his name tag for a second. His name was Krom, the Turkish word for chrome, since, for the first time in my life I was meeting someone with the name Krom I asked him about his name. Perhaps he is the only person with this name in Turkey. He told me that, this name was given by his father, who was a worker of a chrome mine in Central Anatolia and that day, when Mr. Krom, was born; his father had a shift and could not accompany his wife. That night when he went back to home from work, he holds his child for the first time and decides to give him the name Krom, while the time Mr. Krom was born he was working in the chrome mine. A week after this interesting coincidence, I went to Prof. Philipp and told him that I decided to study Turkish Chrome Sales as my PhD thesis. Life is full of coincidences but I still don’t know to what extend this coincidence influenced my decision to study World War II Turkish Chrome Sales . I would like to express my deepest gratitude for my Doktorvater Herr Prof. Dr. Thomas Philipp for his patience, generosity and support throughout this study. Having the chance to be the PhD student of such an eminent Professor was a great privilege for me. By attaching priority to detailed research and giving utmost support, he paved the way for a better dissertation. My thanks go as well to Prof. Dr. Dr. hc Şefik Alp Bahadir. Without his guidance and moral support, I could not have written my PhD thesis in such a short period. Thanks to his helpfulness I easily overcame the burdens of being a foreign student in Germany. Besides that I feel myself lucky to be acquainted with such a personality. I would like to say thank you to the lovely secretary of our institute, Karin Rohde and Heiko Schuß i I would like to say thank you to all my family members one by one. First of all, I would like to remember my dear dad Prof. Dr. Rifat Önsoy with gratitude. I know how much he wanted me to chose this profession and how halfheartedly I started my career, but now I have started to love it. My mom Gülsen, and my three aunts, Mimi, Türkan and Nono, who are nothing less than my mom, I owe each of you a lot, you tolerated every mental state of a PhD candidate from beginning to end. My cousin (sister) Dilek, her husband Chris and lovely Kyra, thanks for opening your house to me in Washington DC and giving the opportunity to live with you a wonderful year and organic indeed. Without you I could not have the chance to conduct research in US. The last person I would like to say thank you from family is my grandma Emine, whom I will always remember with gratitude. I also want to say thank you to my colloquies and professors from the Hacettepe University Department of International Relations and my MA supervisor Hasan Ünal and his precious wife Evgenia. My special thanks go to Tuğba Özden, my love and best friend. She didn’t withhold his support for any single moment despite my mental instability throughout the thesis. Last but not least I would like to say thank you to all my friends, Ozan, Orkun, Sinem and Arcan for all the entertaining and sportive moments they shared with me, all the ‘Konutkent Tayfa’; Barış, Batu, Erdem, Ertan, Hakan, Koray and Türker. My school and later roommate, Önder, and Tolga. Ramajana Jasarspahic her brother Kenan and their lovely family, Görkem Uludüz and his wife Pınar, Emrah Safa Gürkan and his fiance Elif and Lara Panis and her family. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………………………i TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER I: THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND DEFINITIONS OF ECONOMIC WARFARE AND NEUTRALITY…………………………………………………………5 1.1. Economic Warfare………………………………………………………………………5 1.1.1. Definitions of Economic Warfare…………………………………………………5 1.1.2. History of Economic Warfare……………………………………………………..6 1.1.2.1. From Blockade to ‘Economic Warfare’, a Brief History…………………6 1.1.2.2. Pre-War Planning of Economic Warfare in Germany…………………….8 1.1.2.3. Pre-War Planning of Economic Warfare in Great Britain……………….11 1.1.2.4. Pre-War Planning of Economic Warfare in the USA…………………....15 1.1.3 Economic Warfare Measures………………………………………………………16 1.1.3.1. Choosing Economic Warfare Methods…………………………………..17 1.1.4. Cost of the Economic Warfare…………………………………………………....18 1.1.5. Effectiveness of the Economic Warfare…………………………………………..18 1.2. Neutrality……………………………………………………………………………....19 1.2.1. Definitions………………………………………………………………………...19 1.2.2. Types of Neutralities……………………………………………………………....22 1.2.3. Factors Determining the Cost to a Neutral of Severing its Trade with a Belligerent………………………………………………………………………………24 1.2.3.1. A Deterring Factor: The Fear of Military Intervention…………………..25 1.2.4. The Economic Rights and Obligations of Neutrals……………………………….25 1.2.5. Ways of Controlling Neutral Trade/Economic Warfare Methods………………..26 1.2.5.1. Shipping Control……………………………………………………...…26 1.2.5.1.1. Diverting the Ships in the Sea………………………………...….27 1.2.5.2. Blacklisting of Foreign Firms………………………………………...…28 1.2.5.3. Measures for Controlling Re-exports from Neutral Territories……..…28 1.2.5.3.1. Blockade……………………………………………………….…....29 1.2.5.3.2. Guarantees for the Final Destination. ……………………….……...29 iii 1.2.5.3.3.Embargo……………………………..…………..……................................29 1.2.5.3.4 Diverting Neutral Trade…...…………..………..………………………….30 1.2.5.3.5 Pre-Emptive Buying and Economic Cooperation in the Allocation of Critical Materials…………………………………………..……..…………………………..31 1.2.6. Neutrals in the Eye of Belligerents………………..…..…………………………....31 CHAPTER 2 NEUTRALITY AND TURKEY...…………………………………………..34 2.1. Roots of Turkish Foreign Policy of Neutrality…………………………………………34 2.1.1 Turkish State Elite and Their Contribution to the Neutrality…………………….36 2.1.1.1. Atatürk and His Foreign Policy of Neutrality……………………………….36 2.1.1.2. İnönü and His Foreign Policy of Neutrality…………………………………40 2.1.2. Guiding Principles of the Turkish Foreign Policy………………………………...43 2.1.2.1. The Impact of Kemalism on the Turkish Foreign Policy of Neutrality: The Priority of Peace, Sovereignty and National Development Over Expansionist Revisionism:44 2.1.2.2. Russia as the Primary Threat to the Security of the Republic………………….47 2.2. Relations with the Major Powers Prior to World War II……………………...………...49 2.2.1. Germany: Ever Increasing Dependence……………...…………………………...50 2.2.2. Italy and the New Enemy……………………………..………………………….54 2.2.3. The Soviet Union: the Archenemy…………………...…………………………...56 2.2.4. Great Britain: the Remittent Partner………………...……………………………58 2.2.5 The United States of America: Nothing but Diplomatic Cordiality……...……….62 2.3. Military Weakness as the main reason for Neutrality………………………...…………63 2.4. Turkish Neutrality in World War II…………………………………………...………...64 CHAPTER 3: ECONOMIC WARFARE in TURKEY REGARDING CHROME...……...74 3.1. Germany’s Dependency on Chrome from Abroad………………………………………77 3.1.1. Balkans and Germany’s Chrome Situation………………………………………..81 3.2. Turkey and Chrome……………………………………………………………………...83 3.2.1. Turkish Suppliers Value to Germany……………………………………………..85 3.2.2. Chrome ore Pre-emption in the Second World War……………………...………86 3.2.3. Allied Economic Warfare and the Turkish Chrome in the Second World War…..87 iv 3.2.4. Allied Economic Warfare Plans in The Case of a German Invasion of Turkey…115 3.2.5. Important Factors Affecting the Allied Economic Warfare Regarding Turkish Chrome……………………………………………………………………………………...116 3.2.5.1. The Turkish Policy of Neutrality and Tough Bargaining Strategy Regarding the Chrome Sales……………………………………………………………………………116 3.2.5.2. Role of Transportation Difficulties……………………………………....131 3.2.5.3. Role of the Mine Owners………………………………………………..139 3.3. British Chrome Policy and its Evolution Throughout the War………………………...142 3.3.1. First Period……………………………………………………………………....142 3.3.2. Second Period …………………………………………………………………..146 3.3.3. Third Period ………………………………………………………………….....150 3.4. The U.S. Foreign Policy and Chrome……………………………………………….....158 CHAPTER 4: REASONS FOR THE FAILURE OF ALLIED ECONOMIC WARFARE REGARDING CHROME IN TURKEY…………………...………………………………164 4.1. Reasons For The Failure Of Allied Economic Warfare Regarding Chrome In Turkey.164 4.1.1. Failure of the Tripartite Alliance…………………………………………...…...167 4.1.2. Shortsightedness of the Allied Governments in Limiting the Chrome Agreement of January 1940 to Two Years………………………………………………………………....169 4.1.3. Great Britain not Being Able to Replace Germany as a Trade Partner………….170 4.1.4. The Military Ineffectiveness of the Allies……………………………………….171 4.1.4.1.
Recommended publications
  • A Permanently Neutral State in the Security Council Heribert Franz Koeck
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Cornell Law Library Cornell International Law Journal Volume 6 Article 2 Issue 2 May 1973 A Permanently Neutral State in the Security Council Heribert Franz Koeck Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Koeck, Heribert Franz (1973) "A Permanently Neutral State in the Security Council," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 6: Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol6/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Permanently Neutral State in the Security Council HERIBERT FRANZ KOECK* On October 20, 1972, the Republic of Austria was elected, by the General Assembly of the United Nations, a non-permanent member of the Security Council.' This was the first time that a permanently neu- tral state had obtained a seat in the Council, which, since the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Competence of the General Assembly for the Admission of a State to the United Na- tions,2 must be considered the leading political organ of the United Nations. This recent step in the development of the United Nations position towards neutrality was certainly not foreseen by the founding fathers of the Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Tm 9-3305 Technical Manual Principles of Artillery Weapons Headquarters
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com TM 9-3305 TECHNICAL MANUAL PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4 MAY 1981 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com *TM 9-3305 Technical Manual HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 9-3305 Washington, DC, 4 May 1981 PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS REPORTING ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can help improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or if you know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your letter, DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Form 2028-2, located in the back of this manual, direct to: Commander, US Army Armament Materiel Readiness Command, ATTN: DRSAR-MAS, Rock Island, IL 61299. A reply will be furnished to you. Para Page PART ONE. GENERAL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1-1 1-1 2. HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2-1 II. Development of United States Cannon Artillery......................................................... 2-8 2-5 III. Development of Rockets and Guided Missiles ......................................................... 2-11 2-21 CHAPTER 3. CLASSIFICATION OF CURRENT FIELD ARTILLERY WEAPONS Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3-1
    [Show full text]
  • List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford
    List of exhibits at IWM Duxford Aircraft Airco/de Havilland DH9 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (Ex; Spectrum Leisure Airspeed Ambassador 2 (EX; DAS) Ltd/Classic Wings) Airspeed AS40 Oxford Mk 1 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (AS; IWM) Avro 683 Lancaster Mk X (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 100 Vampire TII (BoB; IWM) Avro 698 Vulcan B2 (AS; IWM) Douglas Dakota C-47A (AAM; IWM) Avro Anson Mk 1 (AS; IWM) English Electric Canberra B2 (AS; IWM) Avro Canada CF-100 Mk 4B (AS; IWM) English Electric Lightning Mk I (AS; IWM) Avro Shackleton Mk 3 (EX; IWM) Fairchild A-10A Thunderbolt II ‘Warthog’ (AAM; USAF) Avro York C1 (AS; DAS) Fairchild Bolingbroke IVT (Bristol Blenheim) (A&S; Propshop BAC 167 Strikemaster Mk 80A (CiA; IWM) Ltd/ARC) BAC TSR-2 (AS; IWM) Fairey Firefly Mk I (FA; ARC) BAe Harrier GR3 (AS; IWM) Fairey Gannet ECM6 (AS4) (A&S; IWM) Beech D17S Staggerwing (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Fairey Swordfish Mk III (AS; IWM) Bell UH-1H (AAM; IWM) FMA IA-58A Pucará (Pucara) (CiA; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress (CiA; IWM) Focke Achgelis Fa-330 (A&S; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress Sally B (FA) (Ex; B-17 Preservation General Dynamics F-111E (AAM; USAF Museum) Ltd)* General Dynamics F-111F (cockpit capsule) (AAM; IWM) Boeing B-29A Superfortress (AAM; United States Navy) Gloster Javelin FAW9 (BoB; IWM) Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (AAM; IWM) Gloster Meteor F8 (BoB; IWM) BoeingStearman PT-17 Kaydet (AAM; IWM) Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Branson/Lindstrand Balloon Capsule (Virgin Atlantic Flyer Grumman F8F-2P Bearcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC)
    [Show full text]
  • Art in Wartime
    Activity: Saving Art during Wartime: A Monument Man’s Mission | Handouts Art in Wartime: Understanding the Issues At the age of 37, Walter Huchthausen left his job as a professor at the University of Minnesota and a designer and architect of public buildings to join the war efort. Several other artists, architects, and museum person- nel did the same. In December 1942, the director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, Francis Taylor, heard about the possibility of serving on a team of specialists to protect monuments in war zones. He wrote : “I do not know yet how the Federal Government will decide to organize this, but one thing is crystal clear; that we will be called upon for professional service, either in civilian or military capacity. I personally have ofered my services, and am ready for either.” Do you think it was a good use of U.S. resources to protect art? What kinds of arguments could be advanced for and against the creation of the MFAA? Arguments for the creation of the MFAA: Arguments against the creation of the MFAA: Walter Huchthausen lost his life trying to salvage an altarpiece in the Ruhr Valley, Germany. What do you think about the value of protecting art and architecture in comparison to the value of protecting a human life? Arguments for use of human lives to protect art during war: ABMCEDUCATION.ORG American Battle Monuments Commission | National History Day | Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media Activity: Saving Art during Wartime: A Monument Man’s Mission | Handouts Arguments against the use of human lives to protect art during war: Germany had purchased some of the panels of the famous Ghent altarpiece (above) before World War I, then removed other panels during its occupation of Belgium in World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuban Antifascism and the Spanish Civil War: Transnational Activism, Networks, and Solidarity in the 1930S
    Cuban Antifascism and the Spanish Civil War: Transnational Activism, Networks, and Solidarity in the 1930s Ariel Mae Lambe Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Ariel Mae Lambe All rights reserved ABSTRACT Cuban Antifascism and the Spanish Civil War: Transnational Activism, Networks, and Solidarity in the 1930s Ariel Mae Lambe This dissertation shows that during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) diverse Cubans organized to support the Spanish Second Republic, overcoming differences to coalesce around a movement they defined as antifascism. Hundreds of Cuban volunteers—more than from any other Latin American country—traveled to Spain to fight for the Republic in both the International Brigades and the regular Republican forces, to provide medical care, and to serve in other support roles; children, women, and men back home worked together to raise substantial monetary and material aid for Spanish children during the war; and longstanding groups on the island including black associations, Freemasons, anarchists, and the Communist Party leveraged organizational and publishing resources to raise awareness, garner support, fund, and otherwise assist the cause. The dissertation studies Cuban antifascist individuals, campaigns, organizations, and networks operating transnationally to help the Spanish Republic, contextualizing these efforts in Cuba’s internal struggles of the 1930s. It argues that both transnational solidarity and domestic concerns defined Cuban antifascism. First, Cubans confronting crises of democracy at home and in Spain believed fascism threatened them directly. Citing examples in Ethiopia, China, Europe, and Latin America, Cuban antifascists—like many others—feared a worldwide menace posed by fascism’s spread.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Neutrality: Spain, Sweden and Switzerland in the Second World War
    The Economics of Neutrality: Spain, Sweden and Switzerland in the Second World War Eric Bernard Golson The London School of Economics and Political Science A thesis submitted to the Department of Economic History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, 15 June 2011. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. ‐ 2 ‐ Abstract Neutrality has long been seen as impartiality in war (Grotius, 1925), and is codified as such in The Hague and Geneva Conventions. This dissertation empirically investigates the activities of three neutral states in the Second World War and determines, on a purely economic basis, these countries actually employed realist principles to ensure their survival. Neutrals maintain their independence by offering economic concessions to the belligerents to make up for their relative military weakness. Depending on their position, neutral countries can also extract concessions from the belligerents if their situation permits it. Despite their different starting places, governments and threats against them, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland provided similar types of political and economic concessions to the belligerents.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment
    Recent Slprt•• books World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1979 World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbooks 1968-1979, Cumulative Index Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation Other related •• 8lprt books Ecological Consequences of the Second Ihdochina War Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Environment Publish~d on behalf of SIPRI by Taylor & Francis Ltd 10-14 Macklin Street London WC2B 5NF Distributed in the USA by Crane, Russak & Company Inc 3 East 44th Street New York NY 10017 USA and in Scandinavia by Almqvist & WikseH International PO Box 62 S-101 20 Stockholm Sweden For a complete list of SIPRI publications write to SIPRI Sveavagen 166 , S-113 46 Stockholm Sweden Stoekholol International Peace Research Institute Warfare in a Fragile World Military Impact onthe Human Environment Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of disarmament and arms regulation. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden's 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed by the Swedish Parliament. The staff, the Governing Board and the Scientific Council are international. As a consultative body, the Scientific Council is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Dr Rolf Bjornerstedt, Chairman (Sweden) Professor Robert Neild, Vice-Chairman (United Kingdom) Mr Tim Greve (Norway) Academician Ivan M£ilek (Czechoslovakia) Professor Leo Mates (Yugoslavia) Professor
    [Show full text]
  • The Vulnerabilities of Developed States to Economic Cyber Warfare
    Working Paper The Vulnerabilities of Developed States to Economic Cyber Warfare Paul Cornish Head, International Security Programme and Carrington Professor of International Security, Chatham House June 2011 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication. Working Paper: The Vulnerabilities of Developed States to Economic Cyber Warfare INTRODUCTION The central features of the ‘cybered’ world of the early 21st century are the interconnectedness of global communications, information and economic infrastructures and the dependence upon those infrastructures in order to govern, to do business or simply to live. There are a number of observations to be made of this world. First, it is still evolving. Economically developed societies are becoming ever more closely connected within themselves and with other, technologically advanced societies, and all are becoming increasingly dependent upon the rapid and reliable transmission of ideas, information and data. Second, where interconnectedness and dependency are not managed and mitigated by some form of security procedure, reversionary mode or redundancy system, then the result can only be a complex and vitally important communications system which is nevertheless vulnerable to information theft, financial electronic crime, malicious attack or infrastructure breakdown.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bush - the Unauthorized Biography by Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin
    George Bush - The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin Introduction AMERICAN CALIGULA 47,195 bytes THE HOUSE OF BUSH: BORN IN A 1 33,914 bytes BANK 2 THE HITLER PROJECT 55,321 bytes RACE HYGIENE: THREE BUSH 3 51,987 bytes FAMILY ALLIANCES THE CENTER OF POWER IS IN 4 51,669 bytes WASHINGTON 5 POPPY AND MOMMY 47,684 bytes 6 BUSH IN WORLD WAR II 36,692 bytes SKULL AND BONES: THE RACIST 7 56,508 bytes NIGHTMARE AT YALE 8 THE PERMIAN BASIN GANG 64,269 bytes BUSH CHALLENGES 9 YARBOROUGH FOR THE 110,435 bytes SENATE 10 RUBBERS GOES TO CONGRESS 129,439 bytes UNITED NATIONS AMBASSADOR, 11 99,842 bytes KISSINGER CLONE CHAIRMAN GEORGE IN 12 104,415 bytes WATERGATE BUSH ATTEMPTS THE VICE 13 27,973 bytes PRESIDENCY, 1974 14 BUSH IN BEIJING 53,896 bytes 15 CIA DIRECTOR 174,012 bytes 16 CAMPAIGN 1980 139,823 bytes THE ATTEMPTED COUP D'ETAT 17 87,300 bytes OF MARCH 30, 1981 18 IRAN-CONTRA 140,338 bytes 19 THE LEVERAGED BUYOUT MOB 67,559 bytes 20 THE PHONY WAR ON DRUGS 26,295 bytes 21 OMAHA 25,969 bytes 22 BUSH TAKES THE PRESIDENCY 112,000 bytes 23 THE END OF HISTORY 168,757 bytes 24 THE NEW WORLD ORDER 255,215 bytes 25 THYROID STORM 138,727 bytes George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin With this issue of the New Federalist, Vol. V, No. 39, we begin to serialize the book, "George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography," by Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrich Berber and the Politics of International Law in Germany and India, 1920S-1960S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online K. Rietzler Journal of Global History, 11.1 (2016) Counter-Imperial Orientalism: Friedrich Berber and the Politics of International Law in Germany and India, 1920s-1960s Katharina Rietzler1 This is the peer reviewed, accepted manuscript of an article which will be published in final form in the Journal of Global History, Vol. 11.1 (March 2016), doi:10.1017/S1740022815000303 Abstract: The most trenchant critiques of Western international law are framed around the legacy of its historic complicity in the imperial project of governing non-European peoples. International law organised Europe and its ‘others’ into a hierarchy of civilizational difference that was only ever reconfigured but never overturned. But when analysing the complex relationship between international law and imperialism the differences within Europe—as opposed to a dyadic opposition of Europe versus the ‘rest'—also matter. Within the historical and political constellations of the early and mid-twentieth century, German difference produced a set of arguments that challenged dominant discourses of international law by posturing as anti- imperial critique. This article focuses on the global career of Friedrich Berber (1898-1984) who, as a legal adviser in Nazi Germany and Nehru’s India, was at the forefront of state-led challenges to liberal international law. Berber fused notions of German civilizational superiority with an appropriation of Indian colonial victimhood, and pursued a shared politics of opposition. He embodies a version of German-Indian entanglement which did not abate after the Second World War, emphasizing the long continuities of empire, power differentials, civilizational hierarchies and developmental logics under the umbrella of international law.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of German-Scandinavian Relations
    A History of German – Scandinavian Relations A History of German-Scandinavian Relations By Raimund Wolfert A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Raimund Wolfert 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Table of contents 1. The Rise and Fall of the Hanseatic League.............................................................5 2. The Thirty Years’ War............................................................................................11 3. Prussia en route to becoming a Great Power........................................................15 4. After the Napoleonic Wars.....................................................................................18 5. The German Empire..............................................................................................23 6. The Interwar Period...............................................................................................29 7. The Aftermath of War............................................................................................33 First version 12/2006 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations This essay contemplates the history of German-Scandinavian relations from the Hanseatic period through to the present day, focussing upon the Berlin- Brandenburg region and the northeastern part of Germany that lies to the south of the Baltic Sea. A geographic area whose topography has been shaped by the great Scandinavian glacier of the Vistula ice age from 20000 BC to 13 000 BC will thus be reflected upon. According to the linguistic usage of the term
    [Show full text]
  • Disarmament Conference 1932-1933 Orange Rows: Abyssinia Crisis 1935
    Key: Blue rows: Manchuria 1931 Green rows: Disarmament Conference 1932-1933 Orange rows: Abyssinia Crisis 1935 Date Event Significance September 1931 Japanese Army claims Chinese troops sabotaged the “Plausible” reason to invade: in self-defence, not invasion per se railway (belonging to the Japanese), invaded Manchuria and expelled Chinese troops February 1932 Creation of the puppet state of Manchukuo, with Henry Pu “Puppet State” meant that the League of Nations could not Yi installed as the emperor directly accuse the Japanese of taking over Manchuria, since it is technically an independent state July 1932 Germany proposes option of allowing Germany to rearm to Shows that other countries did not see Germany as an equal, but the level of other powers in the Disarmament Conference. as a defeated nation Proposal rejected, Germany walks Late 1932 Japanese Imperial Army attached Shanghai with warplanes - and gunships, ignored civilian government’s instructions to withdraw. China appealed to the League to take action (banking on idea of collective security) September 1932 LoN officials present report after field trip; Japan was to - withdraw from Manchuria December 1932 Agreement to treat Germany equally Indecisiveness of League: took 5 months just to decide to treat Germany as an equal January 1933 Germany returns to the Conferences - February 1933 Hitler becomes Chancellor (quite obvious, no?) February 1933 Japan announced further expansion plans in China - 24 February 1933 League votes 42:1 on the subject (with the one being Japan, Illustrated
    [Show full text]