DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 Annual Report School of Natural Resource Sciences Entomology Natural Resources Management Range Science Soil Science 2010 Annual Report College of Agriculture, Food Systems and Natural Resources Calendar Year January 1‐December 31, 2010 Annual Report School of Natural Resource Sciences January 1, 2010-December 31, 2010 Table of Contents I. Goals/Accomplishments Current Year A. Instruction and Student Success 1. Teaching Initiatives and Innovation .............................................................................. 3 2. Advising Initiatives, and Innovation .............................................................................. 4 3. Curriculum Development Including New Programs, Deletion of Programs, Administrative changes .......................................................................................... 14 4. Accreditation or Other Reviews ................................................................................. 17 5. Activities in Student Recruitment/Retention, Enrollment Management, and Other Student Activities .......................................................................................... 17 6. Distance Education (Including On-Line) Progress ..................................................... 18 7. Assessment ............................................................................................................... 19 B. Research and Creative Activity 1. Research and Creative Activities ............................................................................... 20 2. Grants/Contracts ........................................................................................................ 21 3. Articles/Books/Publications ........................................................................................ 28 4. Presentations ............................................................................................................. 46 5. Technology Transfer .................................................................................................. 50 C. Outreach 1. Professional Service .................................................................................................. 50 2. Alumni Events and Other Community-Related Activities ........................................... 63 3. Fund-raising Accomplishments .................................................................................. 63 4. Other Outreach Activities ........................................................................................... 64 D. Special Initiatives 1. Cooperative Programming/Interinstitutional Activities ................................................ 71 2. International Activities ................................................................................................ 72 3. Interdisciplinary Activities ........................................................................................... 72 4. Economic Development Efforts .................................................................................. 74 5. On-Line Courses and Programming .......................................................................... 74 E. Planning 1. School’s Future Plans, Future Challenges and Program Strengths .......................... 74 2. School Goals for 2011 ............................................................................................... 75 F. Enrollment and FTE Data ........................................................................................ 76 1 G. Other Relevant Data and Materials 1. Impact ........................................................................................................................ 83 2. Awards and Recognition of Faculty/Staff/Students .................................................. 105 3. Personnel in the School of Natural Resource Sciences .......................................... 107 4. Soil Testing Laboratory Annual Report (July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010) ..................... 111 5. 2010 Soil and Water Environmental Laboratory Annual Report .............................. 112 H. Diversity 1. Accomplishments to Create a Respected and Safe Environment ........................... 113 2. Progress to Increase Representation of Historically Underrepresented Groups Among Students, Staff and Faculty ..................................................................... 113 3. Strategical Planning Undertaken to address the NDSU Strategic Plan of Diversity 114 2 Annual Report School of Natural Resource Sciences January 1, 2010-December 31, 2010 I. GOALS/ACCOMPLISHMENTS CURRENT YEAR A. Instruction and Student Success 1. Teaching Initiatives, and Innovation Adnan Akyüz participated in the peer review of teaching workshop in summative evaluation. The purpose of this workshop was to assign a peer evaluator who works with him throughout the semester and attends his classes to evaluate his teaching methodologies in order to improve student learning. In addition, the peer evaluator wrote a formal evaluation to be used in his promotion and tenure portfolio. Adnan developed a website where students enter daily meteorological variables as a part of the required activity for the class. The students taking the course had to purchase a sling psychrometer to measure air temperature and wet bulb temperature. Using formulas, they had to calculate relative humidity and dew point temperature. This way the students exercised the fundamentals of meteorology and climatology observations. Mark Boetel developed and coordinated a graduate-level 1-credit course in Biological Control (insects). Frank Casey was on developmental leave in spring 2010 and his graduate student, Xuelian Bai, taught his Soil 480/680 – Soil and Waste Disposal course. He provided Xuelian with all his lecture notes and visuals and advised and provided her with guidance on a weekly basis via Skype. Dr. Tom DeSutter helped teach the graduate portion of the course by directing and overseeing the graduate projects. Frank taught a one-week short course on Soil-Water Relationships and Basic Soil Physics to researchers and graduate students at the Teagasc Research Centre at Johnstown Castle, Wexford Ireland. Frank is working on developing a laboratory manual for Soil Physics. During his developmental leave he worked on several exercises for soil physics. He is hoping to be able to publish the exercises for soil physics courses throughout English-speaking countries. Larry Cihacek revised and placed class materials into PowerPoint presentations for SOIL 782 – Advanced Soil Fertility. New equipment was purchased for the SOIL 210-Introduction to Soil Science lab sessions, which allowed for improvement of the lab on soil water. Students now measure water contents of soil by three methods (TDR, tensiometer, and gypsum block). The funds from the College to buy this equipment were greatly appreciated. A lab on comparative effects of N and P deficiency on wheat was also developed. Complete documentation of the set-up of every lab, including every student station, was accomplished. This was done so that the content of our labs can be offered to other colleges in the NDUS who offer Soil 210, and to provide a complete documentation of the labs should someone else be assigned to teach the labs in the future. 3 Stephen Foster canvassed Entomology faculty and some graduate students concerning a new course on chemical ecology starting Fall 2011. After discussion he decided to proceed with a temporary 400/600 two-credit course titled “Chemical Ecology of Insects” taught fall each in even-numbered years. Depending upon its initial success, the course may be expanded to a 3- credit course titled “Chemical Ecology” Amy Ganguli conducted a major revision of RNG 336 Introduction to Range Management. A new textbook and supplemental readings were used, new material was added, the range plant identification portion of this course was re-designed, and new forms of assessment were utilized (via. blackboard). She also revised RNG 458/658 Grazing Ecology. New readings and new material were introduced, new assignments were created, and students participated in a group project, which involved developing a management plan for the NDSU sheep facility. Graduate students in David Hopkins’ Soils 644 – Soil Genesis and Survey class were given a choice of a preparing a standard term paper/lecture or a field-based learning project. Several students favored a field-based approach. The class decided to focus on the Nahon series, a widely distributed sodium-affected soil in eastern North Dakota, but one lacking detailed characterization data. Conversations with landowners that farmed the Nahon soil were held in September to locate parcels of these soils proximate to Fargo. A producer near Wheatland gave his permission for students to investigate the morphologic and soil chemical properties of a Nahon delineation, and mentioned that he was considering installing tile drainage. The students were able to investigate and sample soils in the field, which complimented the laboratory field experiences they gained during the formal lab period. In addition, students made GIS maps illustrating pedon sampling sites as well as portraying results of Veris salinity surveys which were conducted in October. All of the graduate students participated in Veris work and calibration sampling. Local experts dealing with drainage were identified on and off campus so that students could assess how soil chemistry patterns were being addressed prior to the installation of tile. Laboratory work was also performed to measure salinity trends
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus
    SECTION 9 SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) 1. Taxonomy of the Genus Helianthus, Natural Habitat and Origins of the Cultivated Sunflower A. Taxonomy of the genus Helianthus The sunflower belongs to the genus Helianthus in the Composite family (Asterales order), which includes species with very diverse morphologies (herbs, shrubs, lianas, etc.). The genus Helianthus belongs to the Heliantheae tribe. This includes approximately 50 species originating in North and Central America. The basis for the botanical classification of the genus Helianthus was proposed by Heiser et al. (1969) and refined subsequently using new phenological, cladistic and biosystematic methods, (Robinson, 1979; Anashchenko, 1974, 1979; Schilling and Heiser, 1981) or molecular markers (Sossey-Alaoui et al., 1998). This approach splits Helianthus into four sections: Helianthus, Agrestes, Ciliares and Atrorubens. This classification is set out in Table 1.18. Section Helianthus This section comprises 12 species, including H. annuus, the cultivated sunflower. These species, which are diploid (2n = 34), are interfertile and annual in almost all cases. For the majority, the natural distribution is central and western North America. They are generally well adapted to dry or even arid areas and sandy soils. The widespread H. annuus L. species includes (Heiser et al., 1969) plants cultivated for seed or fodder referred to as H. annuus var. macrocarpus (D.C), or cultivated for ornament (H. annuus subsp. annuus), and uncultivated wild and weedy plants (H. annuus subsp. lenticularis, H. annuus subsp. Texanus, etc.). Leaves of these species are usually alternate, ovoid and with a long petiole. Flower heads, or capitula, consist of tubular and ligulate florets, which may be deep purple, red or yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudotsuga Menziesii
    SPECIAL PUBLICATION 4 SEPTEMBER 1982 INVERTEBRATES OF THE H.J. ANDREWS EXPERIMENTAL FOREST, WESTERN CASCADE MOUNTAINS, OREGON: A SURVEY OF ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CANOPY OF OLD-GROWTH Pseudotsuga Menziesii D.J. Voegtlin FORUT REJEARCH LABORATORY SCHOOL OF FORESTRY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Since 1941, the Forest Research Laboratory--part of the School of Forestry at Oregon State University in Corvallis-- has been studying forests and why they are like they are. A staff or more than 50 scientists conducts research to provide information for wise public and private decisions on managing and using Oregons forest resources and operating its wood-using industries. Because of this research, Oregons forests now yield more in the way of wood products, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Wood products are harvested, processed, and used more efficiently. Employment, productivity, and profitability in industries dependent on forests also have been strengthened. And this research has helped Oregon to maintain a quality environment for its people. Much research is done in the Laboratorys facilities on the campus. But field experiments in forest genetics, young- growth management, forest hydrology, harvesting methods, and reforestation are conducted on 12,000 acres of School forests adjacent to the campus and on lands of public and private cooperating agencies throughout the Pacific Northwest. With these publications, the Forest Research Laboratory supplies the results of its research to forest land owners and managers, to manufacturers and users of forest products, to leaders of government and industry, and to the general public. The Author David J. Voegtlin is Assistant Taxonomist at the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Host Plant Resistance Against Sunflower Moth, <I
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations and Student Research in Entomology Entomology, Department of 8-2017 Evaluation of host plant resistance against sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Hulst), in cultivated sunflower in western Nebraska Dawn M. Sikora University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologydiss Part of the Entomology Commons Sikora, Dawn M., "Evaluation of host plant resistance against sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Hulst), in cultivated sunflower in western Nebraska" (2017). Dissertations and Student Research in Entomology. 50. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologydiss/50 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Student Research in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Evaluation of host plant resistance against sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Hulst), in cultivated sunflower in western Nebraska by Dawn Sikora A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Entomology Under the Supervision of Professors Jeff Bradshaw and Gary Brewer Lincoln, Nebraska August, 2017 Evaluation of host plant resistance against sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Hulst), in cultivated sunflower in western Nebraska Dawn Sikora, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2017 Advisors: Jeff Bradshaw and Gary Brewer Sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum, is a serious pest of oilseed and confection sunflowers. In this study, we determine efficacy of resistance against this pest. Thirty commercial hybrids, inbreds, and varieties of sunflowers were tested in replicated field and laboratory studies.
    [Show full text]
  • E1457 Integrated Pest Management of Sunflower Insect Pests in The
    E1457 Integrated Pest Management of Sunflower Insect Pests in the Northern Great Plains Janet J. Knodel, Extension Entomologist Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Laurence D. Charlet, Research Entomologist USDA, ARS, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, ND John Gavloski, Extension Entomologist Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives, Crops Branch, Carman, MB ultivated sunflowers, Helianthus annuus L., are native to North America and include 50 species in the genus Helianthus. Because sunflowers are Cnative, associated insects have coevolved with the plants for centuries. When sunflowers were altered from a wild to a cultivated state, the changes had an impact on the insects associated with sunflowers in their native home. Plant architecture, growth phenology and plant community were altered when sunflowers were changed from wild to cultivated. For plant architecture, sunflowers changed from multiple to a single head, from branched to a single stem and from small to large seeds. The growth phenology also changed from variable emergence and extended periods of flowering in the wild type sunflower to discrete emergence and a short flowering period in cultivated sunflower. The plant community changed from small patches of mixed species of wild sunflowers to large acreage of a monoculture of cultivated sunflowers. A number of insects made the transition from the wild plant type to the cultivated plant to feed and develop. Some of these species affect the producers’ ability to increase seed production and thus have become economic pests. In the major sunflower-producing areas of the Dakotas, Minnesota and Manitoba, approximately 15 species of insects can cause plant injury and economic loss to sunflowers, depending on the severity of infestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Oilseed Crops in Western Canada Alfalfa Looper Aphids
    Oilseed Crops Western Committee on Crop Pests Guide to Integrated Control of Insect Pests of Crops Insect Management In Oilseed Crops in Western Canada (Canola, mustard, flax, sunflowers, safflower) John Gavloski; Manitoba Agriculture and Resource Development Last Updated: August 2021 Note: For pesticide toxicity to bees see the chapter in this guide on: "Hazards and Safeguards in Applying Insecticides to Crops in Bloom"; the link for this reads “Bee Poisoning”. Alfalfa Looper Autographa californica (Speyer) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Alfalfa Looper (canola) Economic threshold - No thresholds have been determined for the alfalfa looper in canola but check threshold levels for the Bertha armyworm as a guideline. Chemical Control – IPM status of insecticides – All the insecticides registered in Canada for alfalfa looper in oilseed crops are more general in their impact on insect communities, also being harmful to pollinators, parasitoids and predaceous insects. Insecticide Rate Rate Preharvest (vol/acre) (vol/ha) Interval (days) References Chlorpyrifos1 Lorsban/ Pyrinex 0.3 - 0.4 L 0.75-1.0 L 21 1-3 /Nufos /Citadel /Warhawk References - 1. Dolinski et al., Pest. Res. Rep. 1973:136. 2. Jacobson et al., Pest. Res. Rep. 1973:137. 3. McDonald, Pest. Res. Rep. 1973:252. 1Registration of chlorpyrifos has been cancelled. Existing stocks in Canada are being phased-out. The last date of sale by retailers is December 10, 2022. All use of chlorpyrifos must cease by December 10, 2023. Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Main species of aphids on crop: Flax: Potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thos.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Canola: Turnip aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kltb.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) 1 WCCP Guide to Integrated Control of Insect Pests o f Crops Monitoring- Flax - Flax should be sampled for aphids when the crop is in full bloom, and assessed again at the green boll stage if aphid densities are near the threshold but not controlled (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Categorisation of Non‐EU Tephritidae
    SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 21 November 2019 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5931 Pest categorisation of non-EU Tephritidae EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), Claude Bragard, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Francesco Di Serio, Paolo Gonthier, Marie-Agnes Jacques, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Christer Sven Magnusson, Panagiotis Milonas, Juan A Navas-Cortes, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Philippe Lucien Reignault, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Wopke Van der Werf, Antonio Vicent Civera, Jonathan Yuen, Lucia Zappala, Eleftheria Maria Bali, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Stella Papanastassiou, Ewelina Czwienczek and Alan MacLeod Abstract The Panel on Plant Health performed a group pest categorisation of non-EU Tephritidae, a large insect family containing well-studied and economically important fruit fly species and little studied species with scarce information regarding their hosts and species that do not feed on plants. Information was saught on the distribution of each species and their hosts. Tephritidae occur in all biogeographic regions except in extreme desert and polar areas, where their hosts are scarce or absent. Non- European Tephritidae are listed in 2000/29 EC as Annex 1/A1 pests whose introduction into the EU is prohibited. Non-EU Tephritidae are regularly intercepted in the EU. Interceptions mainly occur on fruits although there is potential for entry on other plant parts. Beginning with over 5,000 recognised species, factors relevant for pest categorisation were sequentially used to narrow down the list of species to create a list of Tephritidae not known to be established in the EU yet which occur in countries with some EU climate types and which feed on plants that occur in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH of the UNITED STATES (Diptera: Tephritidae)
    1.0 1/11/2.5 2.2 1.1 1.1 111111.25 11111 1.4 111111.6 11111 1.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A NATIDNAL BUREAU OF STANDAROS-1963-A i 6~~ ~_. - (; ~> I' \, ," '" <> Q -i'. .D « 0" ',' '" p P 'J -:. y~.' /'.',,": :$, ,/ -l,; .C ~ r;;;:. ';. ,~ .., .. , {~ 0 , FRUIT FLY GENERA SOLJTH OF TH E UNITED STATES (Diptera: Tephritidae) by RICHARD H. FOOTE F\ UNITED STATES TECHNICAL PREPARED BY I\U.~), DEPARTMENT OF BULLETIN SCIENCE AND ~ AGRICULTURE NUMBER 1600 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION ABSTRACT Foote, Richard H. 1980. Fruit fly genera south of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1600,79 pp. The 88 genera of fruit flies in Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America are discussed. Keys to all genera are pre­ sented, and a synonymy, diagnosis, and discussion of each genus follow. Included for each genus is information about its distribution, its rela­ tionship to other genera, its composition in terms of the species belong­ ingto it, aids to its recognition, and references for identifying its species. Several diagnostic characteristics and the wing of at least one species in almost every genus have been illustrated. Four genera, previously re­ garded as valid, have been synonymized with others, and three addi­ tional genera, long recorded from the region, are shown not to occur in the New World or to belong to other fly families. Fruit flies comprise the most economically important family of plant-inhabiting Diptera, consid­ ering the potential for agricultu"'al damage by species of such genera as Anast-repha, Ceratitis, Dacu.s, andRhagoletis.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods Gary L Parsons Gerasimos Cassis Andrew R. Moldenke John D. Lattin Norman H. Anderson Jeffrey C. Miller Paul Hammond Timothy D. Schowalter U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon November 1991 Parson, Gary L.; Cassis, Gerasimos; Moldenke, Andrew R.; Lattin, John D.; Anderson, Norman H.; Miller, Jeffrey C; Hammond, Paul; Schowalter, Timothy D. 1991. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An annotated list of insects and other arthropods. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-290. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 168 p. An annotated list of species of insects and other arthropods that have been col- lected and studies on the H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. The list includes 459 families, 2,096 genera, and 3,402 species. All species have been authoritatively identified by more than 100 specialists. In- formation is included on habitat type, functional group, plant or animal host, relative abundances, collection information, and literature references where available. There is a brief discussion of the Andrews Forest as habitat for arthropods with photo- graphs of representative habitats within the Forest. Illustrations of selected ar- thropods are included as is a bibliography. Keywords: Invertebrates, insects, H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, arthropods, annotated list, forest ecosystem, old-growth forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Oilseed Crops in Western Canada (Canola, Mustard, Flax, Sunflowers, Safflower)
    Oilseed Crops Western Committee on Crop Pests Guide to Integrated Control of Insect Pests of Crops Insect Management In Oilseed Crops in Western Canada (Canola, mustard, flax, sunflowers, safflower) John Gavloski; Manitoba Agriculture and Resource Development Last Updated: January 2020 Note: For pesticide toxicity to bees see the chapter in this guide on: "Hazards and Safeguards in Applying Insecticides to Crops in Bloom"; the link for this reads “Bee Poisoning”. Alfalfa Looper Autographa californica (Speyer) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Alfalfa Looper (canola) Economic threshold - No thresholds have been determined for the alfalfa looper in canola but check threshold levels for the Bertha armyworm as a guideline. Chemical Control – IPM status of insecticides – All the insecticides registered in Canada for alfalfa looper in oilseed crops are more general in their impact on insect communities, also being harmful to pollinators, parasitoids and predaceous insects. Insecticide Rate Rate Preharvest (vol/acre) (vol/ha) Interval (days) References Chlorpyrifos 0.3 - 0.4 L 0.75-1.0 L 21 1-3 Lorsban/ Pyrinex /Nufos /Citadel /Warhawk/ Sharphos/ MPower Krypton References - 1. Dolinski et al., Pest. Res. Rep. 1973:136. 2. Jacobson et al., Pest. Res. Rep. 1973:137. 3. McDonald, Pest. Res. Rep. 1973:252. Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Main species of aphids on crop: Flax: Potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thos.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Canola: Turnip aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kltb.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Monitoring- Flax - Flax should be sampled for aphids when the crop is in full bloom, and assessed again at the green boll stage if aphid densities are near the threshold but not controlled (3). Sample 25 plants at full 1 WCCP Guide to Integrated Control of Insect Pests of Crops bloom or 20 plants at early green boll growth stage (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Scouting Protocols for Sunflower Pests, 2010
    Field Scouting Protocols for Sunflower Pests, 2010 Goals: There are two major goals for these protocols: To get a good sense of which insect pests are present in sunflower fields across Vermont, of when their life stages occur, and of their typical populations. To gain an understanding of where economic thresholds lie for significant pests, and establish a rough idea of the pests’ life history and potential populations based on our observations. Procedure: The following procedures for monitoring adult populations of Sunflower Receptacle Maggot (Gymnocarena diffusa), Sunflower Stem Maggot (Strauzia longipennis), and Sunflower Seed Maggot (Neotephritis finalis) will be used at State Line Farm in North Bennington and at the Scott farm in Newbury; field arrangement at the Borderview Farm doesn’t allow use of the same technique. Set Up: Select two random locations in the field, at least 75 feet (23m) from the field edge. For each location, hang five ammonium-baited yellow sticky traps on wire hangers in an X pattern, with each corner spaced from the others 35 meters (115 ft.), and the middle card placed where the diagonals cross. It is important to get the traps into the field as soon after planting as is feasible, no later than June 1. Data Collection – Adults: Every other week (preferably on the same day) for eighteen weeks (9 sampling dates), collect traps, wrap them in Saran wrap, and identify Sampling area layout and count the insects of each species. Be sure to mark the date, the trap number, the species collected, and the number of each species. This is most important for the three sunflower maggot species that we’re concerned with, but identifying the others on the trap will be helpful when possible.
    [Show full text]
  • FRUIT FLY BIBLIOGRAPHY 302 MYIA Volume 9 Bibliography
    FRUIT FLY BIBLIOGRAPHY 302 MYIA Volume 9 Bibliography by Lynn E. Carroll, Allen L. Norrbom, F. Christian Thompson, & Neal L. Evenhuis. The following bibliography gives full references to the works Journals/Serials: Journal titles are usually abbreviated fol- cited in the catalog as well as many other works dealing with lowing the standards of the Serial Sources for the BIOSIS Tephritidae. All together 5,368 works are included in this database, Biosciences Information Service, and the Interna- bibliography. A concerted effort was made to examine as many tional Standard (ISO). Abbreviations for journals not found in of the cited references as possible in order to ensure accurate these sources have been formed on the same principles. All the citation of authorship, date, title, and pagination. References abbreviations used are given herein. Additional information, are listed alphabetically by author and chronologically for such as series number or name, is given in parentheses but not multiple articles with the same authorship. italicized. New series and equivalents like Neue Folge are abbreviated (n.s.). Volume and plate numbers are given in Author's names: Names of authors are cited in the bibliog- Arabic numbers irrespective of whether or not Roman numerals raphy the same as they are in the text for proper association of were used in the work cited. Issue or part numbers are included literature citations with entries in the catalog. Because of the in parentheses after the volume number only if each issue is differing treatments of names, especially those containing arti- separately paginated. In cases where there is no volume cles such as de, del, van, Le, etc., these names are cross-indexed number, but the volume pertains to a particular year, that year in the bibliography under the various ways they may be treated is used as the volume number even though the actual date of elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico Ware Potato RA.Docx
    Importation, from Mexico into the United States, of Potato, Solanum tuberosum, Tubers Intended for Consumption A Pathway-initiated Commodity Risk Assessment April 2011 Agency contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Ware Potato, Solanum tuberosum, from Mexico Executive Summary In this document we present results of an assessment of the risks associated with the importation, from Mexico into the United States (the 50 states and Caribbean territories), of ware potatoes (i.e., potatoes for consumption only), Solanum tuberosum L. A search of available sources of information and APHIS, PPQ port interception records identified eight quarantine pests of S. tuberosum that occur in Mexico and could be introduced into the United States in consignments of that commodity. Consequences of Introduction were estimated by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate/host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact, resulting in the calculation of a risk value. Likelihood of Introduction was estimated by considering both the quantity of the commodity to be imported annually and the potential for pest introduction, resulting in the calculation of a second risk value. The two values were summed to estimate an overall Pest Risk Potential, which is an estimation of risk in the absence of mitigation. Quarantine pests considered likely to follow the import pathway are presented in the following table, indicating their risk ratings.
    [Show full text]