Sunflower Insects.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sunflower Insects.Pdf Published 1997 5 Sunflower Insects LAURENCE D. CHARLET USDA-ARS Northern Crop Science Laboratory Fargo, North Dakota GARY J. BREWER North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota BERNARD A. FRANZMANN Queensland Department ofPrimary Industries Toowoomba 4350 Australia A diverse assemblage of insect species attack sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) worldwide (Rajamohan, 1976; Rogers, 1992). Since sunflower is native to North America, a large pest complex has evolved on wild sunflower and has moved from wild ancestors to commercial cultivars. In other countries and to a lesser extent in North America, some insects have adapted to utilize sunflower as an alternative host. Many of these insects develop or increase in number on adjacent or earlier-planted crops and then after senescence move to sunflower. The successful management of insect pests depends on correctly identify­ ing the pest, understanding the pest's biology, field sampling of pest densities, and selecting the appropriate control methods. The use of integrated pest man­ agement assures that control decisions will be based on economics and achieved with minimal disruption to the environment, the least possible harm to nontarget organisms, and reduced probability that secondary or minor pests will likely become a problem. The integrated pest management philosophy will assure that the most effective control strategies are management techniques that combine resistant cultivars, cultural control, biological control, and the application of insecticides only when pest populations have reached economic injury levels. Insecticides approved for usage on specific insects are constantly changing based on the registration of new products or loss of current registration, therefore the local county agent, crop consultant, or state extension service should be contact­ ed for current recommendations. The discussion of insects associated with sun­ flower that follows is organized by the continent or region in which they occur and by the part ofthe plant attacked (see insert with color plates). Copyright © 1997. American Society of Agronomy. Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711, USA. Sunflower Technology and Produc­ tion, Agronomy Monograph no. 35 . 183 184 CHARLET ET AL. INSECT PESTS OF THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND MEXICO Sunflower is utilized by a wide array of insect species, both as a food plant and as a source of pollen and nectar. Over 150 phytophagous insect species have been reported from cultivated and native species of sunflower in North America (Hilgendorf & Goeden, 1981; Rogers, 1988b). Sunflower is the only row crop in North America that coexists with its native congeners. This unique relationship has enhanced development of insect problems by providing monocultures of host plants where only isolated hosts were once available. A number of insect species have adapted to cultivated sunflower and have become consistent economic pests (Charlet et aI., 1987). STEM AND ROOT FEEDING SPECIES Cutworms [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] Cutwonns are perennial pests of sunflower occurring in isolated outbreaks. In the upper Great Plains of North America, four species are common. These are the dark-sided cutwonn [Euxoa messoria (Harris)], the red-backed cutwonn [E. ochrogaster (Guenee)], the pale western cutwonn (Agrotis orthogonia Morrison), and the dingy cutwonn (Feltia ducens Walker). Other cutwonn species attacking sunflower vary by region (Westdal, 1975). Description Dark-Sided Cutworm. The adult has forewings that are usually light, powdery, and grayish-brown with indistinct markings. Larvae are pale-brown dorsally, white on the ventral areas, and with indistinct stripes on the sides. At maturity, larvae are 25 to 32 mm in length. Red-Backed Cutworm. Forewings of the adult are reddish-brown with characteristic bean-shaped markings. The larvae are dull-gray to brown with soft fleshy bodies and are from 25 to 32 mm in length when grown. Larvae are char­ acterized by two dull-reddish stripes along the dorsal side. Pale Western Cutworm. Forewings on the adult are tan and mottled with light-colored primary wing veins. Hindwings are white, darkening distally. Larvae are grayish in color without spots or stripes, but the body has fine, flat granules. Dingy Cutworm. Adults have forewings with bean-shaped markings sim­ ilar to those found on the red-backed cutworm. The hind wings of males are whitish with a broad, dark margin along the outside while those o( females are unifonn dark gray in color. Larvae are a dull, dingy-brown color with a broad, dull-gray dorsal stripe, which is separated into triangular-shaped areas on each segment. A narrow, dark stripe is on each margin of the central stripe (Capinera & Schaefer, 1983; McBride et aI., 1985, 1994; Metcalf & Metcalf, 1993). SUNFLOWER INSECTS 185 Life History The dark-sided and red-backed cutworms have similar life histories. Larvae of these species emerge in May and early June and develop until about the end of June. Pupation lasts about 3 wk and takes place in the soil in earthen cells near the soil surface. Eggs are oviposited in the soil in late July and early August and remain dormant until the following spring. There is one generation per year. The pale western cutworm feeds underground and usually ceases feeding by late June. Eggs are laid singly or in small groups on the soil and hatch on warm winter days or in early spring. There is a single generation per year. The dingy cutworm is a northern species. They emerge as adults in August and are active until mid-October. Eggs are deposited and hatch in the fall. Dingy larvae develop to the second or third instar before overwintering in the soil. Pupation occurs in the spring to early summer. There is one generation per year (McBride et al., 1985, 1994; Metcalf & Metcalf, 1993). Damage Cutworms damage sunflower by cutting the stem of the plant from 2 to 5 mm above or below the soil line, although occasionally, damage may occur at greater distances from the soil line. Sometimes, larvae, especially the dark-sided, climb the plant to feed on foliage. Larvae are most active at night and hide in the soil during the day. Wilted and dead plants are evidence of cutworm damage. Severed plants wither and may blow away leaving distinct bare patches in the sunflower field. Cutworms have a wide host range and infest most row crops. In sunflower, a gap of 10 to 12 plants in a row is necessary before an economic loss is seen (McBride et al., 1985, 1994). Management Strategies Sampling should begin as soon as sunflower plants emerge and fields should be checked twice weekly until about mid-June. The soil around damaged plants should be inspected for cutworm larvae. Species that feed above the soil line can be controlled with the use of poison-bran baits. For other species, insec­ ticides have to be incorporated into the soil. Several insecticides are registered for cutworm control in the USA and Canada. Cutworms are parasitized by a variety of tachinid and hymenopteran parasitoids and insect predators consume a signif­ icant number of cutworm larvae. Disease and birds also limit cutworm damage (McBride et al., 1985, 1994; Metcalf & Metcalf, 1993). Sunflower Bud Moth, Suleima helianthana (Riley) [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae] The only lepidopterous species of potential economic concern as a stem pest is the sunflower bud moth. The moth is found on sunflower from Mexico to the central USA, occurring in all the sunflower growing areas (Pedraza-Martinez, 1990; Rogers, 1979). 186 CHARLET ET AL. Description Moths have gray to brown forewings with two dark bands and a light patch on the back half of the wing tip (Color Plate 1). The first band runs through the middle of the wing. The second band is located near the wingtip. The wingspan is about 17 mm. Eggs are ovoid and translucent-white in color. Sculpturing on the egg surface gives it a wrinkled appearance. Larvae have smooth, cream-colored bodies with yellow-brown head capsules and are about 15 mm in length at matu­ rity. There are five larval instars. Pupae are found in feeding tunnels near the lar­ val entrance hole into the stem (Ehart, 1974). Life History In the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota, first-generation adults emerge from late May to mid-June and deposit single eggs on the terminal portion of the plant (Ehart, 1974). Larvae tunnel into the stalk, leaf petiole, or receptacle to feed on the pith. Larval tunnels are usually less than 3 cm in length (Rogers, 1979). At maturity, larvae return to the entrance hole to pupate. Entrance holes are characterized by a protuding, black, sticky frass (Color Plate 2). They can be found in the stalk, leaf petiole, or less commonly, the bud. Second-generation adults appear in late July, oviposit on the sunflower bud or stalk, and are active until mid-August. Larvae of the second generation are more likely to feed in the receptacle of the capitula than the first generation. Larvae plug the entrance hole with frass and other material and burrow into undisturbed pith to overwinter (Ehart, 1974). In Texas, infestations can occur in early May. There are two generations per season in North Dakota and northern Texas and possibly three generations per season in south-central Texas (Phillips, 1972). Host species include wild and commercial H. annuus and 16 other species of Helianthus (Rogers, 1979). Damage Infestations are sporadic but can be heavy at times. Although larval feed­ ing sometimes produces malformed stalks, leaf petioles, and capitula, tunneling in stalks does not normally interfere with stem development. Economic damage is usually restricted to those plants in which infestation occurred in terminals of very small plants or in small capitula. Larvae do not feed on seeds but consume the pithy part of the head (Ehart, 1974; Rogers, 1979).
Recommended publications
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Integrated Pest Management of the Sunflower Stem
    E-821 (Revised) Biology and Integrated Pest Management of the SunflowerSunflower StemStem WeevilsWeevils inin thethe GreatGreat PlainsPlains Janet J. Knodel, Crop Protection Specialist Laurence D. Charlet, USDA, ARS Research Entomologist he sunflower stem weevil, Cylindrocopturus adspersus T(LeConte), is an insect pest that has caused economic damage to sunflower in the northern and southern Great Plains of the USA and into Canada. It belongs in the order Coleoptera (beetles) and family Curculionidae (weevils), and has also been called the spotted sunflower stem weevil. It is native to North America and has adapted to wild and cultivated Figure 1. Damage caused by sunflower stem weevil – sunflower lodging and stalk breakage. sunflowers feeding on the stem and leaves. The sunflower stem weevil was first reported as a pest in 1921 from severely wilted plants in fields grown for silage in Colorado. In North Dakota, the first sunflower stem weevil infestation ■ Distribution was recorded in 1973, causing 80% The sunflower stem weevil has been reported from most states yield loss due to lodging (Figure 1). west of the Mississippi River and into Canada. Economically Populations of sunflower stem weevil damaging populations have been recorded in Colorado, Kansas, have fluctuated over the years with high Nebraska, North Dakota, Minnesota, South Dakota, and Texas. numbers in some areas from the 1980s The black sunflower stem weevil can be found in most sunflower production areas with the greatest concentrations in to early 1990s in North Dakota. southern North Dakota and South Dakota. Another stem feeding weevil called the black sunflower stem weevil, Apion occidentale Fall, also occurs throughout the Great Plains, and attacks sunflower as a host.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Lace Bugs of Namibia (Heteroptera, Tingoidea, Tingidae)1
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Lace bugs of Namibia (Heteroptera, Tingoidea, Tingidae)1 J. DECKERT & U. GÖLLNER-SCHEIDING Abstract: This paper provides locality records and host plant data for 85 species in 32 genera of Namib- ian Tingidae. Three new species are described: Ammianus ernsti nov.sp., Cysteochila bassoni nov.sp., and Cysteochila rusti nov.sp. Forty-three species are recorded for the first time from Namibia. A key to the genera found in Namibia is presented. Key words: Afrotropical Tingidae, distribution, key, Namibia. Introduction oligophagous on a group of related plants, but some species are polyphagous and feed More than 2000 species of lace bugs in on species of several different plant families. approximately 270 genera are known world- wide. One third of all known lace bugs oc- The lion’s share of Tingidae, more than curs in Africa, which amounts to more than 95 % of the described species, belongs to the 600 species in 121 genera (GÖLLNER-SCHEI- subfamily Tinginae. Many genera of Tingi- DING 2004a). Forty-two species of Tingidae nae remain poorly defined and several are have been recorded previously from Namib- almost certainly not monophyletic. LIS ia and the present study increases this num- (1999) and GUILBERT (2001, 2004) dis- ber to 85 species in 32 genera. cussed two contradicting views of the family and subfamily level classification of Tin- Tingidae are mainly distributed in the goidea. One of the main differences be- tropical and temperate zones. All species are of small size. Their total length is usually be- tween these two classifications is the posi- tween two and four millimetres, but a few tion and treatment of Cantacader and some species measure less than two or up to eight related species groups as either a separate millimetres.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-REGULATED PESTS (Non-Actionable)
    Import Health Standard Commodity Sub-class: Fresh Fruit/Vegetables Grape, Vitis vinifera from Australia ISSUED Issued pursuant to Section 22 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 Date Issued: 20 December 2000 1 NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL PLANT PROTECTION ORGANISATION The official contact point in New Zealand for overseas NPPOs is the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI). All communication pertaining to this import health standard should be addressed to: Manager, Import and Export Plants Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 Wellington NEW ZEALAND Fax: 64-4-894 0662 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.mpi.govt.nz 2 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ALL PLANT PRODUCTS All plants and plant products are PROHIBITED entry into New Zealand, unless an import health standard has been issued in accordance with Section 22 of the Biosecurity Act 1993. Should prohibited plants or plant products be intercepted by MPI, the importer will be offered the option of reshipment or destruction of the consignment. The national plant protection organisation of the exporting country is requested to inform MPI of any change in its address. The national plant protection organisation of the exporting country is required to inform MPI of any newly recorded organisms which may infest/infect any commodity approved for export to New Zealand. Pursuant to the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996, proposals for the deliberate introduction of new organisms (including genetically modified organisms) as defined by the Act should be referred to: IHS Fresh Fruit/Vegetables. Grape, Vitis vinifera from Australia. (Biosecurity Act 1993) ISSUED: 20 December 2000 Page 1 of 16 Environmental Protection Authority Private Bag 63002 Wellington 6140 NEW ZEALAND Or [email protected],nz Note: In order to meet the Environmental Protection Authority requirements the scientific name (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Artemisia Californica Less
    I. SPECIES Artemisia californica Less. [Updated 2017] NRCS CODE: Subtribe: Artemisiinae ARCA11 Tribe: Anthemideae (FEIS CODE: Family: Asteraceae ARCAL) Order: Asterales Subclass: Asteridae Class: Magnoliopsida flowering heads spring growth seedling, March 2009 juvenile plant photos A. Montalvo flowering plant, November 2005 mature plant with flower buds August 2010 A. Subspecific taxa None. Artemisia californica Less. var. insularis (Rydb.) Munz is now recognized as Artemisia nesiotica P.H. Raven (Jepson eFlora 2017). B. Synonyms Artemisia abrotanoides Nuttall; A. fischeriana Besser; A. foliosa Nuttall; Crossostephium californicum (Lessing) Rydberg (FNA 2017). C. Common name California sagebrush. The common name refers to its strong, sage-like aroma and endemism to California and Baja California. Other names include: coastal sage, coast sage, coast sagebrush (Painter 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships The FNA (2017) places this species in subgenus Artemisia . The molecular phylogeny of the genus has improved the understanding of relationships among the many species of Artemisia and has, at times, placed the species in subgenus Tridentadae; morphology of the inflorescences and flowers alone does not place this species with its closest relatives (Watson et al. 2002). The detailed phylogeny is not completely resolved (Hayat et al. 2009). E. Related taxa in region There are 18 species and a total of 31 taxa (including infrataxa) of Artemisia in southern California, all of which differ clearly from A. californica in habitat affinity, structure, or both (Munz 1974, Jepson eFlora 2017). Within subgenus Artemisia (as per FNA 2017), A. nesiotica from the Channel Islands is the most similar and was once considered part of A. californica ; it can be distinguished by its wider leaves with flat leaf margins (not rolled under).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    Proceedings of the United States National Museum SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION • WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 112 I960 Number 3431 LACE-BUG GENERA OF THE WORLD (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE) « By Carl J. Drake and Florence A. Ruhoff Introduction A treatise of the generic names of the family Tingidae from a global standpoint embodies problems similar to those frequently encountered in corresponding studies in other animal groups. The more im- portant criteria, including such basic desiderata as fixation of type species, synonyms, priority, and dates of technical publications implicate questions concomitant with recent trends toward the clarification and stabilization of zoological nomenclature. Zoogeography, predicated and authenticated on the generic level by the distribution of genera and species, is portrayed here by means of tables, charts, and maps of the tingifauna of the world. This visual pattern of distribution helps one to form a more vivid concept of the family and its hierarchic levels of subfamilies and genera. To a limited extent the data indicate distributional concentrations and probable centers of evolution and dispersal paths of genera. The phylogenetic relationship of genera is not discussed. The present treatise recognizes 216 genera (plus 79 synonyms, homonyms, and emendations) of the Tingidae of the world and gives 1 Research for this paper was supported In part by the National Science Foundation, grant No. 4095. 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 112 the figure of 1,767 as the approximate number of species now recog- nized. These figures, collated with similar categories in Lethierry and Severin (1896), show that there has been an increase of many genera and hundreds of species of Tingidae during the past three- quarters of a century.
    [Show full text]
  • ROLE of COLOR and ODOR on the ATTRACTION of INSECT VISITORS to SPRING BLOOMING TRILLIUM a Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of
    ROLE OF COLOR AND ODOR ON THE ATTRACTION OF INSECT VISITORS TO SPRING BLOOMING TRILLIUM A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology. By Natasha Marie Shipman Director: Dr. Laura DeWald Professor of Biology Biology Department Committee Members: Dr. Beverly Collins, Biology Dr. Amy Boyd, Biology Summer 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was supported by grants from the Southern Appalachian Botanical Society Earl Core Graduate Student Research Award and North Carolina Native Plant Society Tom and Bruce Shinn Grant. I thank Jay Kranyik, director of the Botanical Gardens at Asheville for allowing me to use this location as my study site. Many Thanks to Warren Wilson College undergraduate students Manday Monroe, Alison LaRocca and Laura Miess for their constant help with field work; Shaun Moore for his support and help with development of experimental flowers and field work; Dr. Paul Bartels for his support and expertise in PRIMER-E; Dr. David Alsop (Professor, retired, Department of Biology, Queens College, The City University of New York) for his expertise and ability to help identify insects collected; my adviser Dr. Laura DeWald for her continued encouragement, advise and support; the rest of my committee Dr. Amy Boyd and Dr. Beverly Collins for advise and support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables……………………………………………………………………. iv List of Figures…………………………………………………………………… v Abstract………………………………………………………………………….. vi Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………..... 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review…………………………………………………... 3 Floral Cues and Insect Response…………………………………….. 3 Plant-Pollinator Interactions: Specializations - Generalizations Continuum……………................ 10 Trillium…………………………………………………………………… 14 Chapter 3: Manuscript………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • 197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus
    SECTION 9 SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) 1. Taxonomy of the Genus Helianthus, Natural Habitat and Origins of the Cultivated Sunflower A. Taxonomy of the genus Helianthus The sunflower belongs to the genus Helianthus in the Composite family (Asterales order), which includes species with very diverse morphologies (herbs, shrubs, lianas, etc.). The genus Helianthus belongs to the Heliantheae tribe. This includes approximately 50 species originating in North and Central America. The basis for the botanical classification of the genus Helianthus was proposed by Heiser et al. (1969) and refined subsequently using new phenological, cladistic and biosystematic methods, (Robinson, 1979; Anashchenko, 1974, 1979; Schilling and Heiser, 1981) or molecular markers (Sossey-Alaoui et al., 1998). This approach splits Helianthus into four sections: Helianthus, Agrestes, Ciliares and Atrorubens. This classification is set out in Table 1.18. Section Helianthus This section comprises 12 species, including H. annuus, the cultivated sunflower. These species, which are diploid (2n = 34), are interfertile and annual in almost all cases. For the majority, the natural distribution is central and western North America. They are generally well adapted to dry or even arid areas and sandy soils. The widespread H. annuus L. species includes (Heiser et al., 1969) plants cultivated for seed or fodder referred to as H. annuus var. macrocarpus (D.C), or cultivated for ornament (H. annuus subsp. annuus), and uncultivated wild and weedy plants (H. annuus subsp. lenticularis, H. annuus subsp. Texanus, etc.). Leaves of these species are usually alternate, ovoid and with a long petiole. Flower heads, or capitula, consist of tubular and ligulate florets, which may be deep purple, red or yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Idell Weydemeyer's Native Plants TREES SHRUBS & SUBSHRUBS
    Idell Weydemeyer’s Native Plants 11-04 Note: • All plants on here are drought resistant except those originating in moist areas. Some will die if given summer water. Sun required unless shade is mentioned. • “LOCAL” means found growing in Idell’s garden or within 100 yards; “Local” means growing within ten miles from the garden. • Thr & Endgr refers to plant posting on Threatened or Endangered List. • There is disagreement among authors as to the range or locations for various plants. TREES Native Plant Common Name Location Aesculus californica California Buckeye LOCAL; Central Coast Ranges to Sierras & Tehachapis; in woodlands, forests & chaparral; on dry slopes & canyons near water; takes clay; deciduous by July or August Arbutus menziesii Madrone Coast Ranges from Baja to British Columbia & N. Sierras; wooded slopes & canyons; full sun to high afternoon shade, well drained acidic soil Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar Oregon to Baja, Nevada & Utah; sandy to clay soil Cercidium floridum Palo Verde California, Arizona, Mexico & Central America; Southern California desert in creosote bush Blue Palo Verde scrub & Colorado Desert (in CA) below 3,000 feet; by dry creeks with water in summer & winter, perfect drainage, no summer water; deciduous part of year Pinus (possibly jeffreyi) Jeffrey Pine Platanus racemosa California Sycamore Coast Ranges & foothills in warmer parts of CA; along creeks; drought tolerant only with high Western Sycamore water table or along coast, tolerates full sun, part shade, seasonal flooding, sand & clay soil; deciduous in fall & winter Populus Cottonwood Regular water; deciduous in winter Prunus ilicifolia Holly-leaved Cherry Coast Ranges from Napa southward into Mexico & to Santa Catalina & San Clement Islands; on dry slopes & flats of foothills Prunus subcordata Klamath Plum Southern California Sierras, Northern California into Oregon; some moisture; deciduous in Sierra Plum winter Prunus virginiana (probably demissa) Chokecherry Most of the West into S.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho PM Technical Note 2B (Revise): Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho - Spokane, Washington ______________________________________________________________________________ TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 2B OCTOBER 2011 REVISION Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Pamela Pavek, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Richard Fleenor, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Mark Stannard, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Tim Dring, State Biologist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Jim Cane, Bee Biology and Systematics Lab, ARS, Logan, Utah Karen Fullen, State Biologist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Loren St. John, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Brownbelted bumble bee (Bombus griseocollis) visiting a blanketflower (Gaillardia aristata). Pamela Pavek The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide guidance for the design and implementation of conservation plantings to enhance habitat for pollinators including: bees, wasps, butterflies, moths and hummingbirds. Plant species included in this document are adapted to the Inland Northwest, which encompasses northern Idaho, northeastern Oregon and eastern Washington. For species adapted to southern Idaho, southeastern Oregon, northern Nevada and northern Utah, refer to Idaho Plant Materials Technical Note 2A. For lists of species adapted to western Washington and western Oregon, refer to the Oregon
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency Home > Plants > Plants with Novel Traits > Applicants > Directive 94­08 > Biology Documents > Helianthus Annuus L
    Canadian Food Inspection Agency Home > Plants > Plants With Novel Traits > Applicants > Directive 94­08 > Biology Documents > Helianthus annuus L. The Biology of Share this page Helianthus annuus L. This page is part of the Guidance Document Repository (GDR). Looking for related documents? Search for related documents in the Guidance Document Repository Biology Document BIO2005­01: A companion document to the Directive 94­08 (Dir94­08), Assessment Criteria for Determining Environmental Safety of Plant with Novel Traits Table of Contents Part A General Information A1. Background A2. Scope Part B The Biology of H. annuus L. B1. General Description, Cultivation and Use as a Crop Plant B2. The Centres of Origin of the Species B3. The Reproductive Biology of H. annuus B4. Breeding, Seed Production and Agronomic Practices for Sunflower B5. Cultivated H. annuus as a Volunteer Weed Part C Related species of H. annuus L. C1. Inter­species/Genus Hybridization C2. Potential for Introgression of Genetic Information from Cultivated H. annuus into Relatives C3. Summary of Ecology of Relatives of H. annuus Part D Potential Interactions of H. annuus L. Table 1. Examples of Potential Interactions of H. annuus L. with Other Life Form During its Life Cycle. Part E Acknowledgements Part F Bibliography Part A ­ General Information A1. Background The Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA) Plant Biosafety Office (PBO) is responsible for regulating the intentional introduction of plants with novel traits (PNTs) into the Canadian environment. PNTs are plants containing traits not present in plants of the same species already existing as stable, cultivated populations in Canada, or are expressed outside the normal statistical range of similar existing traits in the plant species.
    [Show full text]