DOCSLIB.ORG

Big Sagebrush: a Sea Forest Service Rocky Mountain Fragmented Into Lakes, Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-144 Ponds, and Puddles March 2005 Bruce L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big Sagebrush: a Sea Forest Service Rocky Mountain Fragmented Into Lakes, Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-144 Ponds, and Puddles March 2005 Bruce L United States Department of Agriculture Big Sagebrush: A Sea Forest Service Rocky Mountain Fragmented into Lakes, Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-144 Ponds, and Puddles March 2005 Bruce L. Welch Distribution of big sagebrush in the State of Distribution of big sagebrush in the State of Washington before settlement. Washington after settlement Abstract ______________________________________ Welch, Bruce L. 2005. Big sagebrush: A sea fragmented into lakes, ponds, and puddles. Gen. Tech Rep. RMRS-GTR-144. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 210 p. Pioneers traveling along the Oregon Trail from western Nebraska, through Wyoming and southern Idaho and into eastern Oregon, referred to their travel as an 800 mile journey through a sea of sagebrush, mainly big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Today approximately 50 percent of the sagebrush sea has given way to agriculture, cities and towns, and other human developments. What remains is further fragmented by range management practices, creep- ing expansion of woodlands, alien weed species, and the historic view that big sagebrush is a worthless plant. Two ideas are promoted in this report: (1) big sagebrush is a nursing mother to a host of organisms that range from microscopic fungi to large mammals, and (2) many range management practices applied to big sagebrush ecosystems are not science based. Keywords: Artemisia tridentata, distribution, canopy cover relationships, fire interval, nutritive value The Author ____________________________________ Bruce L. Welch is a plant physiologist with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Provo, UT. He earned a B.S. degree from Utah State University in 1965 and an M.S. in 1969 and Ph.D. in 1974 from the University of Idaho. He has been a Forest Service scientist since 1977. The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service Pesticide Precautionary Statement This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. CAUTION: PESTICIDES Big Sagebrush: A Sea Fragmented into Lakes, Ponds, and Puddles Bruce L. Welch Preface ________________________ After studying the big sagebrush ecosystem for 30 years, I have come to three conclusions: Ode to Sagebrush 1. Much misinformation concerning the value and What an amazing plant; the sage, so many faces has it. ecology of big sagebrush exists in the land management The most versatile of our shrubs. High value must be placed upon it. community. So many creatures large and small get winter food source from it. 2. The perceived shortcomings of big sagebrush are a The pungent leaves forever fresh when others are dormant beside it. result of livestock grazing. Break the wind and catch the snow, the ground is safe around it. 3. Big sagebrush is a nursing mother to a host of What a conservationist this plant! Why don’t more people know it? organisms ranging from microscopic to large mammals. Caretaker of the soil, protecting dormant seeds beneath it. I hope that those who read this general technical report So the desert can once more bloom when conditions are right for it. will come to the conclusion that big sagebrush is a valuable And summer too receives a share of favors coming through it. plant species worth preserving. I am, Bruce L. Welch. The shade, the cover, and nests that birds have built within it. Insect galls on the limbs and burrows dug below it. What a vast variety of life, find home and solace in it. Acknowledgments ______________ Paintbrush, so beautiful and fine, could not survive without it. Pushing down roots to attached below, nourishment coming of it. I wish to thank those who provided peer reviews for In fall it blooms and beauty gives to all the land about it. various chapters of this publication. They were: three anony- The autumn days delight the air. Smell the aromas that cause it! mous reviewers (entire manuscript), Mr. Sherel Goodrich How often I have heard the phrase: “It’s just sagebrush, (entire manuscript), Mr. Stanley G. Kitchen; Drs. John W. let’s remove it.” Connelly, Larry S. Jeffery, Rudy King, E. Durant McArthur So naive these people are to fasten that opinion to it. (entire manuscript), Susan E. Meyer, David L. Nelson, I once thought of sage as drab before I really knew it. Thomas M. Quigley (entire manuscript), Michael F. Whiting, Now I view it in another light, and attach much beauty to it. Joel G. Peterson, Gerald Rehfeldt, Nancy L. Shaw, Carl L. Wambolt, and Darrell J. Weber. Their contributions were Dave Hanks, Biology Teacher—Burley High School, Idaho; reprinted invaluable and gratefully received. I received great quan- from the Idaho Wildlife, March/April 1985, page 16 tities of encouragement from the following: Mr. Craig Criddle, Mr. Robert L. Elderkin, Dr. Jordon C. Pederson, The above poem by a Burley High School biology Dr. Fred J. Wagstaff, and Mrs. Susan A. Welch. I give to teacher shows an incredible amount of insight into the them my deepest thanks. And to Dr. E. Durant McArthur, ecology and value of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Dr. Janine Powell, and Dr. Jack Wade, who have This general technical report supports the ecological earned my deepest respect for their courageous sup- principles and value of big sagebrush as expressed in the port of this work, my many thanks. poem. Over 1,600 scientific and nonscientific articles concerning big sagebrush have been reviewed; many are cited within these pages. Dedication _____________________ The subject matter covered in this general technical report can be obtained by scanning the table of contents Whatever honor there may be in this publication, I wish and need not be repeated here. to dedicate it to the following: Drs. Alan A. Beetle, Rexford F. Daubenmire, Howard R. Leach, and Arthur D. Smith— all pioneers in big sagebrush research. You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and number. Telephone (970) 498-1392 FAX (970) 498-1396 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/rm Mailing Address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 Contents Page Chapter I: Getting acquainted with big sagebrush. .............................................. 1 Distribution .......................................................................................................1 Climate .......................................................................................................1 Woodrat middens .......................................................................................2 Pollen spectrum from lakes, bogs, and peats ............................................4 Historic accounts of big sagebrush ............................................................5 Modern distribution .....................................................................................8 Has big sagebrush invaded grasslands? ................................................. 12 Relationship between grazing and big sagebrush canopy cover................... 12 How much of the big sagebrush ecosystem is left?....................................... 15 Life expectancy ..............................................................................................15 Morphology and anatomy ..............................................................................16 Inflorescence versus vegetative branches ...............................................16 Floral development ...................................................................................17 Embryo, seed development, and anatomy ...............................................17 Leaf anatomy and development ...............................................................17 Stem anatomy and development ..............................................................18 Root morphology ......................................................................................19 Soils of big sagebrush ...................................................................................20 Big sagebrush taxonomy and origin ..............................................................25 References ....................................................................................................27 Chapter II: Birds, mammals, and reptiles associated with big sagebrush .......... 47 Birds ............................................................................................................47 Obligate bird species ................................................................................47 Sage grouse ........................................................................................47 Sage thrasher, Brewer’s sparrow, sage sparrow ................................ 53 Facultative birds species ..........................................................................54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Plant Press
    Special Symposium Issue continues on page 14 Department of Botany & the U.S. National Herbarium The Plant Press New Series - Vol. 20 - No. 3 July-September 2017 Botany Profile Plant Expeditions: History Has Its Eyes On You By Gary A. Krupnick he 15th Smithsonian Botani- as specimens (living or dried) in centuries field explorers to continue what they are cal Symposium was held at the past. doing. National Museum of Natural The symposium began with Laurence T he morning session began with a History (NMNH) and the U.S. Botanic Dorr (Chair of Botany, NMNH) giv- th Garden (USBG) on May 19, 2017. The ing opening remarks. Since the lectures series of talks focusing on the 18 symposium, titled “Exploring the Natural were taking place in Baird Auditorium, Tcentury explorations of Canada World: Plants, People and Places,” Dorr took the opportunity to talk about and the United States. Jacques Cayouette focused on the history of plant expedi- the theater’s namesake, Spencer Baird. A (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) tions. Over 200 participants gathered to naturalist, ornithologist, ichthyologist, and presented the first talk, “Moravian Mis- hear stories dedicated col- sionaries as Pioneers of Botanical Explo- and learn about lector, Baird was ration in Labrador (1765-1954).” He what moti- the first curator explained that missionaries of the Mora- vated botanical to be named vian Church, one of the oldest Protestant explorers of at the Smith- denominations, established missions the Western sonian Institu- along coastal Labrador in Canada in the Hemisphere in the 18th, 19th, and 20th tion and eventually served as Secretary late 1700s.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Witcher Meadow Area, Inyo National Forest California Native Plant Society Bristlecone Chapter
    Plants of Witcher Meadow Area, Inyo National Forest California Native Plant Society Bristlecone Chapter PTERIDOPHYTES (Ferns and Allies) EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail E. laevigatum Smooth scouring rush GYMNOSPERMS (Coniferous Plants) CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Juniperus grandis (J. occidentalis v. australis) Mountain juniper EPHEDRACEAE - Ephedra family Ephedra viridis Green ephedra PINACEAE - Pine Family Pinus jeffreyi Jeffrey pine P. monophylla Single-leaf pinyon pine ANGIOSPERMS (Flowering Plants) APIACEAE - Carrot Family Cymopterus aborginum White cymopteris APOCYNACEAE - Dogbane Family Apocynum cannabinum Indian hemp ASTERACEAE - Sunflower family Achillea millefolium Yarrow Agoseris glauca Mountain dandelion Antennaria rosea Pussy toes Arnica mollis Cordilleran arnica Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort A. dracunculus Tarragon/Lemon sage A. ludoviciana Silver wormwood A. tridentata v. tridentata Great basin sage Balsamorhiza sagittata Balsamroot Chrysothamnus nauseosus Rubber rabbitbrush C. viscidiflorus Yellow or Wavy-leaf rabbitbrush Crepis intermedia Hawksbeard Erigeron sp. Fleabane Hulsea heterochroma Red-rayed hulsea Layia glandulosa ssp. glandulosa Tidytips Madia elegans ssp. wheeleri Common madia Tetrademia canescens Soft-leaved horsebrush Tragopogon dubius Goat's beard (WEED) Wyethia mollis Mule ears 1 BETULACEAE - Birch Family Betula occidentalis Western water birch BORAGINACEAE - Borage Family Cryptantha circumscissa v. circumscissa Capped cryptantha C. pterocarya C. utahensis Fragrant
    [Show full text]
  • CDFG Natural Communities List
    Department of Fish and Game Biogeographic Data Branch The Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program List of California Terrestrial Natural Communities Recognized by The California Natural Diversity Database September 2003 Edition Introduction: This document supersedes all other lists of terrestrial natural communities developed by the Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). It is based on the classification put forth in “A Manual of California Vegetation” (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995 and upcoming new edition). However, it is structured to be compatible with previous CNDDB lists (e.g., Holland 1986). For those familiar with the Holland numerical coding system you will see a general similarity in the upper levels of the hierarchy. You will also see a greater detail at the lower levels of the hierarchy. The numbering system has been modified to incorporate this richer detail. Decimal points have been added to separate major groupings and two additional digits have been added to encompass the finest hierarchal detail. One of the objectives of the Manual of California Vegetation (MCV) was to apply a uniform hierarchical structure to the State’s vegetation types. Quantifiable classification rules were established to define the major floristic groups, called alliances and associations in the National Vegetation Classification (Grossman et al. 1998). In this document, the alliance level is denoted in the center triplet of the coding system and the associations in the right hand pair of numbers to the left of the final decimal. The numbers of the alliance in the center triplet attempt to denote relationships in floristic similarity. For example, the Chamise-Eastwood Manzanita alliance (37.106.00) is more closely related to the Chamise- Cupleaf Ceanothus alliance (37.105.00) than it is to the Chaparral Whitethorn alliance (37.205.00).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Cienega Mining District, Northwestern Yuma County, Arizona
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations 1965 Geology of Cienega Mining District, Northwestern Yuma County, Arizona Elias Zambrano Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Department: Recommended Citation Zambrano, Elias, "Geology of Cienega Mining District, Northwestern Yuma County, Arizona" (1965). Masters Theses. 7104. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7104 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY OF CIENEGA MINING DISTRICT, NORTHWESTERN YUM.1\, COUNTY, ARIZONA BY ELIAS ZAMBRANO I J'i~& A THESIS submitted to the faculty of the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT ROLLA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN GEOLOGY Rolla, Missouri 1965 ~!'Approved by ~2/~advisor) ~ ~·-~~ ii ABSTRACT In the mapped area three metamorphic units crop out: calc-silicates and marble, gneiss, and a conglomerate- schist section. The first one consists of a series of intercalations of calc-silicate rocks, local marbles, and greenschist. Quartzite appears in the upper part of the section. This section passes transitionally to the gneiss, which is believed to be of sedimentary origin. Features indicative of sedimentary origin include inter­ calation with marble, relic bedding which can be observed locally, intercalation of greenschist clearly of sedimentary origin, lack of homogeneity in composition with both lateral and vertical variation occurring, roundness of zircon grains, and lack of zoning in the feldspars.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY and MANAGEMENT of MORMON CRICKET, Anabrus Simplex Haldeman
    • ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF MORMON CRICKET, Anabrus simplex Haldeman Final report to the National Park Service submitted by John Capinera and Charles MacVean, Department of Entomology Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 April, 1987 INTRODUCTION The Mormon cricket, Anabrus simplex Haldeman, is a flightless, shield-backed grasshopper which occurs primarily in the Great Plains and sagebrush-dominated regions of the United States and Canada. It is a gregarious insect and is probably best known for its huge migratory aggregations, or bands. These typically develop in permanent breeding areas in broken, mountain habitat and then spread, by walking, to surrounding areas, including agricultural lowlands and valleys (Wakeland and Shull 1 936). Dating to the early encounter in 1848 between hordes of this insect and Mormon settlers in the Salt Lake Valley - from which the name "Mormon crickets" stems - sporadic outbreaks of crickets have caused severe damage to crops, especially wheat and alfalfa (Cowan 1929, Wakeland 1959, Evans 1985). Though crickets normally feed on a wide diversity of rangeland plants, crops are highly preferred (Swain 1944). Homesteaders were forced to abandon farming in northwest Colorado due to the yearly invasions of crickets during the 1920's. Damaging numbers of crickets persisted into the late thirties, with the peak of the epidemic occurring in 1938. Damage by crickets to rangeland plants has been much more difficult to assess than crop damage (Swain 1940, 1944). While crickets do feed on range grasses, particularly the inflorescences, they clearly prefer broad-leaf, succulent species of lesser forage value when these are present (Cowan 1929, Swain 1 944, Wakeland 1959).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    49398 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR time. The information on candidate taxa Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New will be revised and updated continually Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Fish and Wildlife Service by the Regional Offices identified as Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West having lead responsibility for the Virginia. 50 CFR Part 17 particular taxa. The Service anticipates Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Endangered and Threatened Wildlife publishing annually an update of the Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035± and Plants; Review of Plant and candidate notice of review, annual notice of findings on recycled petitions, 9589 (413/253±8615). Animal Taxa That Are Candidates or Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Proposed for Listing as Endangered or and annual description of progress on listing actions. Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Threatened, Annual Notice of Findings Utah, and Wyoming. on Recycled Petitions, and Annual ADDRESSES: Interested persons or organizations should submit comments Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Description of Progress on Listing Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Actions regarding a particular taxon to the Regional Director of the Region Denver Federal Center, Denver, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, identified as having the lead Colorado 80225±0486 (303/236±7398). Interior. responsibility for that taxon. Comments Region 7. Alaska. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and ACTION: Notice of review. of a more general nature may be Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, submitted to the Chief, Division of Anchorage, Alaska 99503±6199 (907/ SUMMARY: In this document, the Fish Endangered Species, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tate Plant Board
    LIBRARY TATE PLANT BOARD E-479 June 1939 United States Department of Agriculture Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine AIDS TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE MORMON AND COULEE CRICKETS AND THEIR ALLIES (ORTHOPTERA; TETTIGONIIDAE, GRYLLACRIDIDAE) By Ashley B. Gurney, Division of Insect Identification Introduction In field work with the Mormon cricket (Anabrus simplex Hald.) and the coulee cricket (Peranabrus scabricollis (Thos.)), it is important to distinguish the two species from each other and from several allied genera and species of Orthoptera. In this paper identification keys, descriptions, notes on known distribution, and illustrations are presented for the purpose of aiding in the identification of these species. In some cases it is inm- possible at present to be sure whether certain specimens which have been studied represent two distinct species or whether they are subspecies of the same one. An attempt has been made to explain such difficulties, and to suggest what specimens will be most helpful in adding to our knowledge of the taxonomic position and geographical distribution of those forms. The principal genera discussed, in addition to the most important ones, Anabrus and Peranabrus, are Apote, Steiroxys, Pediodectes, and Eremopedes. The present paper will be more useful to field workers if a short time is given to studying identified material of several species, so that the important distinctions may be learned by comparison with specimens. The paper is the outgrowth of a study of collections made in 1938 by field work— ers in 10 Western States, who brought together large and important series of several species and genera. Caudell (1907) monographed the Decticinae of North America, and, as regards the species of immediate concern to the Mormon cricket problen, there have been few taxonomic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montana's Glaciated
    Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Prepared by: Stephen V. Cooper, Catherine Jean and Paul Hendricks December, 2001 Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report 2001 Montana Natural Heritage Program Montana State Library P.O. Box 201800 Helena, Montana 59620-1800 (406) 444-3009 BLM Agreement number 1422E930A960015 Task Order # 25 This document should be cited as: Cooper, S. V., C. Jean and P. Hendricks. 2001. Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains. Report to the Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Pro- gram, Helena. 24 pp. plus appendices. Executive Summary Throughout much of the Great Plains, grasslands limited number of Black-tailed Prairie Dog have been converted to agricultural production colonies that provide breeding sites for Burrow- and as a result, tall-grass prairie has been ing Owls. Swift Fox now reoccupies some reduced to mere fragments. While more intact, portions of the landscape following releases the loss of mid - and short- grass prairie has lead during the last decade in Canada. Great Plains to a significant reduction of prairie habitat Toad and Northern Leopard Frog, in decline important for grassland obligate species. During elsewhere, still occupy some wetlands and the last few decades, grassland nesting birds permanent streams. Additional surveys will have shown consistently steeper population likely reveal the presence of other vertebrate declines over a wider geographic area than any species, especially amphibians, reptiles, and other group of North American bird species small mammals, of conservation concern in (Knopf 1994), and this alarming trend has been Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened and Endangered Species Coorespondence
    APPENDIXF THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES CORRESPONDENCE INTRODUCTION Forest Service policy regarding Biological Evaluaitons is summarized in Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2672.4. The intent of the Bilogical Evaluation process is to assess the potential impacts of propsed management activities, and ensure that such activities will not jeopardize the continued existence of: 1. Species listed, or proposed to be listed, as Engangered or Threatened by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and 2. Species designated as sensitive by the Regional Forester. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Project Area The Sioux Ranger District proposes to update allotment management plans for 11 domestic livestock allotments on National Forest System lands in the North and South Cave Hills and East Short Pine land units. The decision associated with this proposal and analysis wi" determine where livestock can graze, when grazing wi" occur and what specific guidelines will be established to regulate the intensity (timing and duration) of grazing. The analysis area includes about 17,700 National Forest acres. The climate is continental and semi-arid, with large seasonal and daily temperature variations being common. Most of the rainfall during the summer is from thunderstorms; flash flooding can occur form the more severe thunderstorms. Streamflow is erratic with most streams being intermittant in nature. Ecological units include hardwood draws, Ponderosa bench and slope, upland, rolling, and table top grassland, rockland, and rimrocks. Detailed information regarding plant community composition and location is found elsewhere in the environmental analysis for this proposed action. Field surveys have been conducted within or adjacent to the project area by Linda Spencer, Kim Reid, Jeff DiBenedetto, and Tim McGarvey during the 2001 field season (s).
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Years of Research at the United States Department of Agriculture
    United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 150 Years of Research at June 2013 the United States Department of Agriculture: Plant Introduction and Breeding I Cover photo: The stately building that once housed the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C., ca. 1890. (This photo is preserved in the USDA History Collection, Special Collections, National Agricultural Library.) II United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 150 Years of Research at June 2013 the United States Department of Agriculture: Plant Introduction and Breeding R.J. Griesbach Griesbach is Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Technology Transfer, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD. i Abstract Griesbach, R.J. 2013. 150 Years of Research at the While supplies last, single copies of this publication United States Department of Agriculture: can be obtained at no cost from Robert J. Griesbach, Plant Introduction and Breeding. U.S. Department USDA-ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1159, Beltsville, MD Washington, DC. 20705; or by email at [email protected]. The U.S. Department of Agriculture celebrated its Copies of this publication may be purchased in various 150th anniversary in 2012. One of the primary formats (microfiche, photocopy, CD, print on demand) functions of the USDA when it was established in 1862 from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 was “to procure, propagate, and distribute among the people new Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (800) 553- and valuable seeds and plants.” The U.S. Government first 6847, www.ntis.gov. became involved in new plant introductions in 1825 when President John Quincy Adams directed U.S.
    [Show full text]