Historical Memories of Apartheid-Era Swaziland

University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Anthropology Scholarship Anthropology 2-2015 Border-situations: Historical Memories of Apartheid-era Swaziland Casey Golomski University of New Hampshire, Durham, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/anth_facpub Part of the African History Commons, African Languages and Societies Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, Cultural History Commons, Oral History Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Casey Golomski. 2015. “Border-situations: Historical Memories of Apartheid-era Swaziland." Johannesburg Salon, “Archives of the Non-Racial” issue, 8: 13-22. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Scholarship by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BORDER-SITUATIONS: HISTORICAL MEMORIES “This essay briefly considers how transnational we feel a sense of ambivalence. It is a limit we recognize OF APARTHEID-ERA SWAZILAND and historical processes of race with regards to that defines and curtails us when it becomes apparent South African apartheid have played out in the that a particular situation in which we find ourselves is Casey Golomski memory of a few contemporary Swazi, and how one for which we are unprepared (or “unconditioned” University of the Witwatersrand // University of for the majority of ordinary Swazi these memories in his terms) to work through. However, this recogni- Massachusetts Boston are made opaque in the culture of their own ethno- tion of limit is one where new forms of self-conscious- national history.” ness and self–realization become possible. Grenze also Swaziland has a shadowed post-colonial history of translates as border, frontier, or edge, thus the psy- race, bound up in intricate ways with culture. Writing a culture of their own ethno-national history. Indeed, to chic twins to the geographic when conceptualized on a racial history of Swaziland represents a relatively new read and write a post-colonial ethnic and racial history broader, indeed transnational scope. historiography (Nyeko 2005), one that is complicated of Swaziland that gives undue weight to South Africa’s The border between Swaziland and South Africa in but not impossible. Contemporary perceptions of or- racial history would miss the complexity of this par- post-independence Swaziland represents diverse am- dinary Swazi citizens do not overtly register an endur- ticular social world and its multiple global constitu- biguities and scales of self-other recognition that were ing violent history of white racist colonial domination, tions. This case speaks to me as one evincing a “border simultaneously racial, sexual, gendered, national, and especially in comparison to powder-keg cases like situation” for ordinary Swazis, one where the collective cultural. Membership and identification within these South Africa, Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of memory of apartheid traces toward a psychic, bodi- two groups—South African or non-Swazi and Swazi—is the Congo, and Kenya. Yet, like Jemima Pierre shows ly, and geographic border, but one that pushes back fluid, yet difference and distinctions rendered between in her study of race in Ghana (2013), immaterial and against practices of mass reflection or reconciliation them are marked by mutuality and circumspection. profoundly transnational forms of race play out in ev- for South Africa and its place in Swazi history. Case While siSwati is recognized as an official language of eryday life in post-colonial places like Swaziland even if material derives from my own ethnographic research, South Africa and the nation has many citizens, South they are not always readily acknowledged or laid out in conversations, and experiences with ordinary yet cos- Africans tend to see Swazis as country-bumpkin types. claims for global political and economic inclusion. This mopolitan and mostly non-progressive Swazi (i.e., not Majority Swazi perceive South Africa as a criminally penumbral dynamism points to what Omi and Winant actively involved in state protest or a quest for a po- dangerous place that is also resourceful for work op- (1994, cited in Pierre 2013:4) refer to in their concept litical revolution) from 2008 onward, as well as docu- portunities and advanced healthcare (Simelane and of racial formation or racialization, “a process that is mentation of a public roundtable called “Swaziland: A Crush 2004). Historical, geopolitical-economic forces always historically situated,” and one “of racial catego- Place of Refuge from Apartheid” at House on Fire in have structured peoples’ movement or aspirations for ries and meanings as fluid, unstable, decentered, and Malkerns in July 2014 as part of the Johannesburg movement across this border, largely pulling Swazis constantly transformed by changing historical, social Workshop on Theory and Criticism’s (JWTC) program into South Africa in migratory systems of wage labor and political relationships.” This points to the ever- “Archives of the Non-Racial.” and pushing South Africans into Swaziland seeking shifting ways that race comes to subtly characterize Karl Jaspers’ (1919) notions of die Grenze and gren- alternative political, social, and moral livelihoods be- ordinary lives. zensituation is useful to think about this conjuncture yond the former apartheid state. While the border has This essay briefly considers how transnational of geography, history, culture, and memory. Jaspers’ been highly porous in practice throughout the twenti- and historical processes of race with regards to South philosophy of religion and humanism centers on the eth century, for majority Swazi the collective memory African apartheid have played out in the memory of a notion of “the limit” (die Grenze), that which presents of South Africa’s apartheid regime and those moving few contemporary Swazi, and how for the majority of itself as a phenomenological affront to our subjective into Swaziland because of it evoke conceptual ambiv- ordinary Swazi these memories are made opaque in the flourishing which we come to recognize and over which alence for this “border” or “limit” which also speaks 13 to a broader self-consciousness and realization as an mobility of Swazis in their movement across the border Ellen Mary Magongo’s (2009) magisterial overview of ethno-nation. into South Africa due to extractive capitalist regimes the kingship’s transition period from the 1970s-1980s Swaziland’s socio-historical origins and further in- of migrant labor up until the neoliberal present (Crush shows how state politics were the more immediate, tegration as an ethno-national polity unfolded from 1987, Simelane and Crush 2004, Hickel 2012). For consuming concern for the nation at large. The critical the mid-nineteenth century onward in collusive proj- many South African political oppositionists, including history of apartheid-era political mobility and memo- ects of the Dlamini, Ndwandwe, and Matsebula clans, famous figures like Oliver Tambo, Ruth First, Desmond ry from the perspective of “the ordinary” is only just amongst others, with the British against neighboring Tutu, Phindile Mfeti, Chris Hani, Winnie Madikizela- emerging in public history forums like South African groups. This alliance was also continually remade in Mandela and Nelson Mandela, Thabo Mbeki, and History Online, works like Number 43 Trelawney contradistinction to encroaching Dutch-Boer settlers. Jacob Zuma, their traffic over the border was done out Park: kwaMaGogo (Masilela 2007), and in social me- Passing subsequently through a violent period of ex- of necessity and fear for of their own and families’ lives dia. Likewise, the ethnography of Swazi collective or propriation in land concessions by these settlers at the as they engaged in the struggle against the state. In personal memories about apartheid is inchoate. turn of that century (Bonner 1983), the British negoti- Swaziland they undertook underground military train- My own ethnographic research in Swaziland has ated colonial protectorate claims over the Swazi to pre- ing, communication networks, and tactical operations. not explicitly focused on apartheid era memories, but vent the polity’s incorporation into the Transvaal and The private school in Mbabane, Waterford Kamhlaba, I see there to be very little everyday conversation or emerging Republic of South Africa. Through a cultural became a haven for elite oppositionists’ children in public discourse about the political lives of exiled or “triumph of tradition” (MacMillan 1985) cohered by in education and social reproduction, and for many more underground South Africans in Swaziland between the the political and economic tactics of the Dlamini roy- less-famous activists’ children, the Catholic Salesian 1960s and 1990s. In my collection of almost three years alists house, and riding the concurrent continent-wide school in Manzini. daily field-notes, a search for the word “apartheid” only wave of decolonization, Swaziland became an indepen- The historiography of apartheid-era Swaziland turned up three times in unsolicited repartee. Two ex- dent state as a “kingdom” under Sobhuza II in 1968. has thus far privileged macro-level, progressivist, and amples follow. It was around this time also that

Load more