DOCSLIB.ORG

Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2010 Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2010 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2010/11 2009/10 % + / ( - ) 2010 2009 % + / ( - ) Enplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 25,519 19,792 28.9% 25,519 19,792 28.9% 123,342 106,591 15.7% American Airlines 16,593 16,140 2.8% 16,593 16,140 2.8% 107,297 86,244 24.4% Continental Airlines 14,658 14,288 2.6% 14,658 14,288 2.6% 94,379 98,856 (4.5%) Delta Airlines 36,317 19,603 85.3% 36,317 19,603 85.3% 184,669 117,759 56.8% Frontier Airlines 15,931 12,687 25.6% 15,931 12,687 25.6% 84,949 73,540 15.5% Hawaiian Airlines 7,536 7,616 (1.1%) 7,536 7,616 (1.1%) 49,307 50,683 (2.7%) Horizon Air 13,753 12,058 14.1% 13,753 12,058 14.1% 81,296 71,717 13.4% Jet Blue 10,453 10,669 (2.0%) 10,453 10,669 (2.0%) 64,002 53,048 20.6% Mesa/US Airways Express/YV 753 - 753 - 2,821 - Northwest - 13,184 (100.0%) - 13,184 (100.0%) - 66,533 (100.0%) Skywest/Delta Connection 5,818 5,689 2.3% 5,818 5,689 2.3% 31,982 30,524 4.8% Skywest/United Express 15,635 13,611 14.9% 15,635 13,611 14.9% 107,786 92,425 16.6% Southwest 205,786 214,471 (4.0%) 205,786 214,471 (4.0%) 1,380,693 1,410,965 (2.1%) United Airlines 29,249 32,626 (10.4%) 29,249 32,626 (10.4%) 173,518 199,056 (12.8%) US Airways 25,755 29,462 (12.6%) 25,755 29,462 (12.6%) 129,309 166,358 (22.3%) CHARTER - - - - - - 423,756 421,896 0.4% 423,756 421,896 0.4% 2,615,350 2,624,299 (0.3%) International Mexicana 5,303 6,524 (18.7%) 5,303 6,524 (18.7%) 33,480 32,327 3.6% 5,303 6,524 (18.7%) 5,303 6,524 (18.7%) 33,480 32,327 3.6% Total Enplaned 429,059 428,420 0.149% 429,059 428,420 0.1% 2,648,830 2,656,626 (0.3%) Deplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 25,320 19,192 31.9% 25,320 19,192 31.9% 119,085 106,048 12.3% American Airlines 16,953 16,399 3.4% 16,953 16,399 3.4% 110,514 86,713 27.4% Continental Airlines 14,549 14,175 2.6% 14,549 14,175 2.6% 93,439 97,362 (4.0%) Delta Airlines 35,024 19,306 81.4% 35,024 19,306 81.4% 177,333 116,296 52.5% Frontier Airlines 15,312 11,570 32.3% 15,312 11,570 32.3% 83,102 73,294 13.4% Hawaiian Airlines 7,264 7,538 (3.6%) 7,264 7,538 (3.6%) 48,880 50,589 (3.4%) Horizon Air 14,325 11,833 21.1% 14,325 11,833 21.1% 83,972 71,917 16.8% Jet Blue 12,047 10,471 15.1% 12,047 10,471 15.1% 64,033 51,260 24.9% Mesa/US Airways Express/YV 612 - 612 - 2,713 86 3054.7% Northwest - 12,952 (100.0%) - 12,952 (100.0%) - 64,606 (100.0%) Skywest/Delta Connection 5,890 5,729 2.8% 5,890 5,729 2.8% 32,052 32,307 (0.8%) Skywest/United Express 16,083 13,577 18.5% 16,083 13,577 18.5% 108,579 89,697 21.1% Southwest 207,311 214,597 (3.4%) 207,311 214,597 (3.4%) 1,380,972 1,410,164 (2.1%) United Airlines 29,904 33,189 (9.9%) 29,904 33,189 (9.9%) 172,399 198,428 (13.1%) US Airways 26,867 30,166 (10.9%) 26,867 30,166 (10.9%) 129,443 167,311 (22.6%) 427,461 420,694 1.6% 427,461 420,694 1.6% 2,606,516 2,616,078 (0.4%) International Mexicana 3,580 6,518 (45.1%) 3,580 6,518 (45.1%) 33,987 33,652 1.0% 3,580 6,518 (45.1%) 3,580 6,518 (45.1%) 33,987 33,652 1.0% Total Deplaned 431,041 427,212 0.9% 431,041 427,212 0.9% 2,640,503 2,649,730 (0.3%) ENPLANED AND DEPLANED PASSENGERS 860,100 855,632 0.5% 860,100 855,632 0.5% 5,289,333 5,306,356 (0.3%) 10/18/2012 10:41 AM Sacramento County Airport System Summary of Activity July 2010 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2010/11 2009/10 % + / ( - ) 2010 2009 % + / ( - ) Sacramento International Airport Passengers Enplaned 429,059 428,420 0.1% 429,059 428,420 0.1% 2,648,830 2,656,626 (0.3%) Deplaned 431,041 427,212 0.9% 431,041 427,212 0.9% 2,640,503 2,649,730 (0.3%) 860,100 855,632 0.5% 860,100 855,632 0.5% 5,289,333 5,306,356 (0.3%) Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) 530,456 559,106 (5.1%) 530,456 559,106 (5.1%) 3,577,225 3,540,943 1.0% # of Landings 4,543 5,140 (11.6%) 4,543 5,140 (11.6%) 33,142 30,763 7.7% Airmail (Pounds) On 152,966 157,511 (2.9%) 152,966 157,511 (2.9%) 1,163,461 1,140,508 2.0% Off 13,132 1,149 1042.9% 13,132 1,149 1042.9% 61,014 9,151 566.7% 166,098 158,660 4.7% 166,098 158,660 4.7% 1,224,475 1,149,659 6.5% Freight (Pounds) On 5,909,954 5,770,104 2.4% 5,909,954 5,770,104 2.4% 35,767,294 39,773,023 (10.1%) Off 6,419,542 6,257,658 2.6% 6,419,542 6,257,658 2.6% 43,475,331 43,284,838 0.4% 12,329,496 12,027,762 2.5% 12,329,496 12,027,762 2.5% 79,242,625 83,057,861 (4.6%) Aircraft Operations Air Carrier - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Air Taxi - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% General Aviation - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Military - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Mather Airport Passengers Enplaned 31 13 138.5% 31 13 138.5% 79 66 19.7% Deplaned 20 13 53.8% 20 13 53.8% 79 76 3.9% 51 26 96.2% 51 26 96.2% 158 142 11.3% Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) 22,758 40,094 (43.2%) 22,758 40,094 (43.2%) 164,622 256,604 (35.8%) # of Landings 259 885 (70.7%) 259 885 (70.7%) 2,787 4,496 (38.0%) Freight (Pounds) On 3,290,689 4,129,971 (20.3%) 3,290,689 4,129,971 (20.3%) 23,553,982 26,323,594 (10.5%) Off 3,729,901 4,077,301 (8.5%) 3,729,901 4,077,301 (8.5%) 25,763,245 26,080,742 (1.2%) 7,020,590 8,207,272 (14.5%) 7,020,590 8,207,272 (14.5%) 49,317,227 52,404,336 (5.9%) Operations Air Carrier - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Air Taxi - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% General Aviation - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Military - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Sacramento Executive Airport Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% # of Landings - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Freight (Pounds) On - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Off - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Operations Air Carrier - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Air Taxi - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% General Aviation - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Military - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% 10/18/2012 10:41 AM Sacramento International Airport Passenger Statistics Prior 12 Months Current Year Prior Year Year over Year Change Enplaned Deplaned Enplaned Deplaned Enplaned % Difference Deplaned % Difference August 2009 403,308 413,085 456,831 465,541 (53,523) -11.7% (52,456) -11.3% September 2009 371,103 364,380 385,116 385,913 (14,013) -3.6% (21,533) -5.6% October 2009 391,828 390,540 406,623 406,456 (14,795) -3.6% (15,916) -3.9% November 2009 360,966 365,184 371,698 371,964 (10,732) -2.9% (6,780) -1.8% December 2009 374,513 371,014 378,792 374,267 (4,279) -1.1% (3,253) -0.9% January 2010 326,458 328,187 326,879 328,982 (421) -0.1% (795) -0.2% February 2010 304,950 305,182 314,502 315,502 (9,552) -3.0% (10,320) -3.3% March 2010 376,794 368,407 370,622 372,823 6,172 1.7% (4,416) -1.2% April 2010 376,645 381,297 387,417 385,828 (10,772) -2.8% (4,531) -1.2% May 2010 399,265 401,407 394,048 396,567 5,217 1.3% 4,840 1.2% June 2010 435,659 424,982 434,738 422,816 921 0.2% 2,166 0.5% July 2010 429,059 431,041 428,420 427,212 639 0.1% 3,829 0.9% 4,550,548 4,544,706 4,655,686 4,653,871 (105,138) -2.3% (109,165) -2.3% Total Enplaned Passengers by Month 525,000 475,000 425,000 2007 2008 375,000 2009 2010 325,000 275,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 10/18/2012 10:41 AM SACRAMENTO COUNTY AIRPORT SYSTEM SACRAMENTO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - SMF PASSENGERS BY YEAR Y.T.D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2011
    Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2011 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2011/12 2010/11 % + / ( - ) 2011 2010 % + / ( - ) Enplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 25,451 25,519 (0.3%) 25,451 25,519 (0.3%) 137,442 123,342 11.4% American Airlines 21,359 16,593 28.7% 21,359 16,593 28.7% 125,549 107,297 17.0% Continental Airlines 13,524 14,658 (7.7%) 13,524 14,658 (7.7%) 91,916 94,379 (2.6%) Delta Airlines 34,719 36,317 (4.4%) 34,719 36,317 (4.4%) 165,845 184,669 (10.2%) Frontier Airlines 14,565 15,931 (8.6%) 14,565 15,931 (8.6%) 75,597 84,949 (11.0%) Hawaiian Airlines 7,573 7,536 0.5% 7,573 7,536 0.5% 50,427 49,307 2.3% Horizon Air 11,316 13,753 (17.7%) 11,316 13,753 (17.7%) 69,346 81,296 (14.7%) Jet Blue 11,909 10,453 13.9% 11,909 10,453 13.9% 67,313 64,002 5.2% Mesa/US Airways Express/YV - 753 (100.0%) - 753 (100.0%) 3,472 2,821 23.1% Skywest/Delta Connection 11,149 5,818 91.6% 11,149 5,818 91.6% 57,907 31,982 81.1% Skywest/United Express 13,461 15,635 (13.9%) 13,461 15,635 (13.9%) 97,706 107,786 (9.4%) Southwest 192,922 205,786 (6.3%) 192,922 205,786 (6.3%) 1,328,959 1,380,693 (3.7%) United Airlines 28,903 29,249 (1.2%) 28,903 29,249 (1.2%) 171,877 173,518 (0.9%) US Airways 25,959 25,755 0.8% 25,959 25,755 0.8% 129,707 129,309 0.3% CHARTER - - - - - - 412,810 423,756 (2.6%) 412,810 423,756 (2.6%) 2,573,063 2,615,350 (1.6%) International AeroMexico 1,583 - 1,583 - 1,583 - Alaska Airlines 1,665 - 1,665 - 12,220 - Mexicana - 5,303 (100.0%) - 5,303 (100.0%) -
    [Show full text]
  • Official Statement
    NEW ISSUE—BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: See “Rating” In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Series Twenty-One C Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, except that no opinion is expressed as to the status of interest on any Series Twenty-One C Bond for any period that such Series Twenty-One C Bond is held by a “substantial user” of the facilities refinanced by the Series Twenty- One C Bonds or by a “related person” within the meaning of Section 147(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Bond Counsel observes, however, that interest on the Series Twenty-One C Bonds is a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series Twenty-One C Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation by the State of Oregon. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Series Twenty-One C Bonds. See “Tax MaTTers.” $27,685,000 THE PORT OF PORTLAND, OREGON Portland International Airport Refunding Revenue Bonds Series Twenty-One C (AMT) Dated: Date of initial delivery Base CUSIP No.: 735240 Due: July 1, as shown on inside cover The Port of Portland (the “Port”) is issuing its Portland International Airport Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series Twenty-One C (AMT) (the “Series Twenty-One C Bonds”) to refund the Port’s outstanding Portland International Airport Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series Fifteen D, to make a deposit to the SLB Reserve Account and to pay costs of issuing the Series Twenty-One C Bonds, all as described herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Airlines Corporation: a Domestic Industry Analysis & Recommendation for Expansion
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2006 Southwest Airlines Corporation: A Domestic Industry Analysis & Recommendation for Expansion Joel LaSharon Thomas University of Tennessee-Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Marketing Commons Recommended Citation Thomas, Joel LaSharon, "Southwest Airlines Corporation: A Domestic Industry Analysis & Recommendation for Expansion" (2006). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1019 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Southwest Airlines Corporation: A Domestic Industry Analysis & Recommendation for Expansion Joel L. Thomas Chancellor's Honors Program University of Tennessee Senior Project May 2,2006 Joel L. Thomas Senior Honors Project Southwest Airlines May 2, 2006 2 Executive Summary After almost thirty years of service, Southwest Airlines has emerged as one of the world's premier airlines. The Southwest approach to business and the industry at large have enabled the company to continue to grow at profit in times of true economic downturn. Presently, the market for air carriers is saturated and highly fragmented. Overcapacity has led the major United States airlines to compete with Southwest's low fare pricing strategy. However, due to the company's brand image of efficient and effective low fare service, Southwest has been able to ward off its competitors (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus Regional Airport Authority
    COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY - PORT COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRAFFIC REPORT June 2014 7/22/2014 Airline Enplaned Passengers Deplaned Passengers Enplaned Air Mail Deplaned Air Mail Enplaned Air Freight Deplaned Air Freight Landings Landed Weight Air Canada Express - Regional 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 Air Canada Express Totals 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 AirTran 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 AirTran Totals 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 American 21,754 22,200 - - - 306 174 22,210,000 Envoy Air** 22,559 22,530 - - 2 ,027 2 ,873 527 27,043,010 American Totals 44,313 44,730 - - 2,027 3,179 701 49,253,010 Delta 38,216 36,970 29,594 34,196 25,984 36,845 278 38,899,500 Delta Connection - ExpressJet 2,888 2,292 - - - - 55 3,709,300 Delta Connection - Chautauqua 15,614 14,959 - - 640 - 374 15,913,326 Delta Connection - Endeavor 4 ,777 4,943 - - - - 96 5,776,500 Delta Connection - GoJet 874 748 - - 33 - 21 1,407,000 Delta Connection - Shuttle America 6,440 7,877 - - 367 - 143 10,536,277 Delta Connection - SkyWest 198 142 - - - - 4 188,000 Delta Totals 69,007 67,931 29,594 34,196 27,024 36,845 971 76,429,903 Southwest 97,554 96,784 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 Southwest Totals 97,554 96,784 - - 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 United 3 ,411 3,370 13,718 6 ,423 1 ,294 8 ,738 30 3,990,274 United Express - ExpressJet 13,185 13,319 - - - - 303 13,256,765 United Express - Mesa 27 32 - - - - 1 67,000 United Express - Republic 4,790 5,133 - - - - 88 5,456,000 United Express - Shuttle America 9,825 9,076 - - - - 151 10,919,112
    [Show full text]
  • 5 PAI.150.Noise Abt
    DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT FAR PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE CHAPTERINVENTORY A Inventory Introduction Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW) is an integral component of the transportation infrastructure serving the Detroit Metropolitan area, southeast Michigan, and northwest Ohio. Because of its airfield and facility capabilities, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport is also a vital part of the national system of airports. The Airport serves as not only the City of Detroit’s front door by providing visitors with an important first impression of the community, but also is the state's largest airport. The Airport provides transportation facilities that are an absolute necessity for some businesses, and a "required" convenience for others. Additionally, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport provides recreational and leisure traveler’s convenient access to air transportation with convenient non-stop and connecting service to many popular destinations. This Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Noise Compatibility Planning Study is an update of a 1992 Study that was adopted by Wayne County and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 1993. The Wayne County Airport Authority has implemented many of the recommendations contained in the previous FAR Part 150 Study. However, since completion of the previous study, there have been changes to the airfield, type of aircraft, and the number of aircraft operating at the airport. As such, many of these changes have likely resulted in changes to noise exposure and therefore the need for an update to the previous Study. The purpose of this airport facilities INVENTORY chapter of the Part 150 Study is to establish a baseline of information about existing airport facilities and operations, as well as local land use.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta April 2003 Worldwide Timetable
    Airline Listing 3M Silver Airways Corporation KE Korean Air Lines Co. Ltd. 6G Sun Air Express, LLC KL KLM Royal Dutch Airlines AA American Airlines LH Deutsche Lufthansa AG AC Air Canada LW Pacific Wings, L.L.C AF Air France NH All Nippon Airways AM Aeromexico Aerovias OS Austrian Airlines AG dba Austrian de Mexico S.A. de C.V. PD Porter Airlines Inc. AS Alaska Airlines QR Qatar Airways (Q.C.S.C.) AV Aerovias del Continente Americano SA South African Airways S.A. AVIANCA SK Scandinavian Airlines System B6 Jetblue Airways Corporation SN Brussels Airlines N.V. BA British Airways SU JSC Aeroflot Russian Airlines CA Air China Limited SV Saudi Arabian Airlines CM Compania Panamena SY MN Airlines LLC de Aviacion, S.A. (COPA) TK Turkish Airlines, Inc. DL Delta Air Lines, Inc. UA United Airlines, Inc. EK Emirates US US Airways ET Ethiopian Airlines Enterprise VS Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited EY Etihad Airways VX Virgin America Inc. F9 Frontier Airlines, Inc. WN Southwest Airlines FI Icelandair DOMESTIC DOMESTIC Stops/ Stops/ Stops/ Stops/ Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq AKRON/CANTON, OH (CAK) To AKRON/CANTON, OH (CAK) From AKRON/CANTON, OH (CAK) To ALBUQUERQUE, NM (cont) From ALBUQUERQUE, NM (cont) From National To National From Dulles (cont) To Dulles (cont) 2 00p 3 20p US5151* CRJ 0 6 6 30a 7 42a US5226* CRJ 0 7 12 31p 4 56p UA1090/UA4914* DEN 125 1 10p 9 02p UA3655*/UA652 DEN 6 Operated By US Airways Express - PSA Airlines Operated
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • General Aviation Activity and Airport Facilities
    New Hampshire State Airport System Plan Update CHAPTER 2 - AIRPORT SYSTEM INVENTORY 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the existing airport system in New Hampshire as of the end of 2001 and early 2002 and served as the database for the overall System Plan. As such, it was updated throughout the course of the study. This Chapter focuses on the aviation infrastructure that makes up the system of airports in the State, as well as aviation activity, airport facilities, airport financing, airspace and air traffic services, as well as airport access. Chapter 3 discusses the general economic conditions within the regions and municipalities that are served by the airport system. The primary purpose of this data collection and analysis was to provide a comprehensive overview of the aviation system and its key elements. These elements also served as the basis for the subsequent recommendations presented for the airport system. The specific topics covered in this Chapter include: S Data Collection Process S Airport Descriptions S Airport Financing S Airport System Structure S Airspace and Navigational Aids S Capital Improvement Program S Definitions S Scheduled Air Service Summary S Environmental Factors 2.2 DATA COLLECTION PROCESS The data collection was accomplished through a multi-step process that included cataloging existing relevant literature and data, and conducting individual airport surveys and site visits. Division of Aeronautics provided information from their files that included existing airport master plans, FAA Form 5010 Airport Master Records, financial information, and other pertinent data. Two important element of the data collection process included visits to each of the system airports, as well as surveys of airport managers and users.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Airlines Internships
    Piedmont Airlines Internships Piedmont Airlines, a wholly owned subsidiary of American Airlines (formerly US Airways), offers 2 paid internships per semester in their Safety department. • Winter (usually January – April), • Summer (May – August) and • Fall (September – December) A few other details to note: - Actual internship dates vary based on each individual intern and their school requirements. - Along with exposure to Safety Programs, the positions include regular data entry and clerical work. - Interns are expected to work normal business hours Monday – Friday weekly. - All candidates must be legally able to work in the United States. We do not sponsor anyone due to the short period of employment. - The intern has the ability to fly as a non-revenue passenger during the course of their internship which includes all flights within the American Airlines system. - We do not provide housing assistance and each position requires the intern to supply their ground transportation as there is no available public transportation to either office. The Fall internship resumes and cover letters need to be submitted through http://piedmont- airlines.com/Careers by July 17th for consideration. Please email any questions to [email protected]. Safety Internship Job Description Job Title: Operational Safety Intern (Based in Middletown, PA) Organization: Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (d.b.a. US Airways Express and American Eagle) Dates of Position: Available Every Semester Time Commitment: Monday – Friday, Regular Business Hours Summary of Position: Assist in achieving the corporate mission of providing a safe environment for employees and customers. Interns will have the opportunity to learn about and be exposed to each function of an airline safety department.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PDX) Monthly Traffic Report August, 2008
    PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PDX) Monthly Traffic Report August, 2008 This Month Calendar Year to Date 2008 2007 %Chg 2008 2007 %Chg Total PDX Flight Operations * 23,458 24,228 -3.2% 175,619 177,612 -1.1% Military 596 304 96.1% 2,797 2,844 -1.7% General Aviation 2,680 3,064 -12.5% 18,010 19,240 -6.4% Hillsboro Airport Operations 24,518 25,136 -2.5% 187,925 161,528 16.3% Troutdale Airport Operations 9,785 10,907 -10.3% 70,577 62,419 13.1% Total System Operations 57,761 60,271 -4.2% 434,121 401,559 8.1% PDX Commercial Flight Operations ** 19,084 19,960 -4.4% 147,954 149,334 -0.9% Cargo 2,464 2,974 -17.1% 20,448 22,322 -8.4% Charter 0 0 44 30 46.7% Major 8,452 8,672 -2.5% 62,830 63,264 -0.7% National 424 372 14.0% 3,060 2,708 13.0% Regional 7,744 7,942 -2.5% 61,572 61,010 0.9% Domestic 18,332 19,190 -4.5% 142,360 143,690 -0.9% International 752 770 -2.3% 5,594 5,644 -0.9% Total Enplaned & Deplaned Passengers 1,433,616 1,460,804 -1.9% 9,991,327 9,776,078 2.2% Charter 0 0 3,271 1,920 70.4% Major 1,017,802 1,077,496 -5.5% 6,955,783 7,067,583 -1.6% National 62,497 59,692 4.7% 454,539 414,932 9.5% Regional 353,317 323,616 9.2% 2,577,734 2,291,643 12.5% Total Enplaned Passengers 716,454 732,664 -2.2% 4,981,517 4,880,384 2.1% Total Deplaned Passengers 717,162 728,140 -1.5% 5,009,810 4,895,694 2.3% Total Domestic Passengers 1,366,154 1,404,415 -2.7% 9,537,487 9,390,729 1.6% Total Enplaned Passengers 683,255 704,644 -3.0% 4,757,367 4,689,043 1.5% Total Deplaned Passengers 682,899 699,771 -2.4% 4,780,120 4,701,686 1.7% Total International Passengers
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Airline Business Strategy
    CHAPTER 6 AIRLINE BUSINESS STRATEGY Gui Lohmann and Bojana Spasojevic Airlines are notorious for providing lower returns on investment when compared with other corporations. As a result, airline executives implement business strategies aiming to obtain higher than normal financial returns. With the liberalisation process that airlines have enjoyed around the world, some carriers have been quite creative in fostering new approaches in terms of their business models, product differentiation and cost reduction. In addition, because of the international multiple-business related nature of airline operations (which includes aircraft manufacturers and maintenance, distribution channels, and airport logistics), these characteristics make airline strategic management a very complex exercise. A number of approaches have been used to explain strategic issues related to airlines. One of them is Shaw’s (2011) application of Porter's classic Five Forces model to the airline industry, a framework for analysing competitive forces, for instance, rivalry, substitution, new entry, power of customers, and power of suppliers. Scholars have also focused their attention on analysing airline strategic decisions relating to a number of managerial issues, with a particular emphasis on mergers and alliances (Gudmundsson and Lechner, 2011; Iatrou and Oretti, 2016). This chapter is structured into four main sections. The first one provides some generic strategies. The second section focuses on airline differentiation strategies and niche products, mainly charter and leisure carriers. The third section tackles growth strategies, examining the four distinct strategies proposed by Ansoff’s Matrix: market penetration, product development, market development and diversification. The fourth section considers different strategic growth methods, including organic growth, mergers and acquisitions, industry cooperation, franchising.
    [Show full text]