5 PAI.150.Noise Abt
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Economic Impact of Willow Run Airport 2014
The Economic Impact of Willow Run Airport 2014 Wayne County Airport Authority Board: Michael J. Jackson, Sr., chairperson; Suzanne K. Hall, vice chairperson; Reginald M. Turner, secretary; Nabih H. Ayad Esq.; Irma Clark-Coleman; Michael Garavaglia; Ronald Hall, Jr. Thomas J. Naughton, CEO Christopher J. Mullin, Director, Willow Run Airport WCAA Photos by Vito Palmisano and Jeff Ellis Lee Redding, Project Director Tim Davis, Director of iLabs 2 The Economic Impact of Willow Run Airport 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 II. Assessing Economic Impact of Willow Run .......................................................................... 5 II.1 The Scope of Economic Impact Analysis ........................................................................ 5 II.1.1 Types of Economic Activities ................................................................................... 5 II.1.2 Geographic Scope of Economic Impact ................................................................... 6 II.2 Quantifying Economic Impact ......................................................................................... 7 II.3 Broader Importance of Willow Run ................................................................................. 9 III. Economic Impact of Cargo Transportation ........................................................................... 10 IV. Economic Impact of Visitors ............................................................................................... -
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Notices 27803 Safety, Adversely Affecting the Efficient Procedural and Substantive ACTION: Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Notices 27803 safety, adversely affecting the efficient procedural and substantive ACTION: Notice. use and management of the navigable requirements of the Act and FAR Part airspace and air traffic control systems, 150 have been satisfied. The overall SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation or adversely affecting other powers and program, therefore, was approved by the Administration (FAA) announces that it responsibilities of the Administrator Assistant Administrator for Airports is reviewing a proposed revision to the prescribed by law. effective July 25, 1994. noise compatibility program that was Specific limitations with respect to Outright approval was granted for all submitted by the Regional Airport the FAA's approval of an airport noise of the specific program elements with Authority of Louisville and Jefferson compatibility program are delineated in the exception of Item 1b, Development County (RAA) under the provisions of FAR Part 150, section 150.5. Approval of SIDS and STARS (Standard Title I of the Aviation Safety and Noise is not a determination concerning the Instrument Departure and Standard Abatement Act of 1979 (Public Law 96± acceptability of land uses under Federal, Arrival Procedures), which was 193) and 14 CFR Part 150. The existing state, or local law. Approval does not by disapproved pending submittal of noise compatibility program was itself constitute an FAA implementing additional information. approved April 8, 1994. The proposed action. A request for Federal action or The approved items are: revision to the noise compatibility approval to implement specific noise program will be approved or compatibility measures may be Noise Abatement Procedures disapproved on or before November 13, required, and an FAA decision on the 1a. -
Monroe County Developers Streamlining Guide
Prepared by the Monroe County Economic Development Corporation Revised March 2018 Table of Contents Monroe County Board of Commissioners ......................................................................... i Monroe County Economic Development Corporation ..................................................... i Monroe County Economic Development Corporation ..................................................... ii Streamlining Development Task Force .............................................................................. ii Streamlining Development User’s Guide .......................................................................... iii Mission Statement ............................................................................................................. iii Goals ................................................................................................................................... iii Keeping this Guide Up to Date ..........................................................................................iv 1. Partnership Pledge ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Streamlining Development Partnership Signatories ......................................................1-1 2. Partnership Assistance & Web Links .............................................................................. 2-1 County & State Organizations ......................................................................................... 2-1 Monroe County Municipalities -
01/21/2021 Page 1 MICHIGAN AERONAUTICS COMMISSION
MICHIGAN AERONAUTICS COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting Lansing, Michigan January 21, 2021 Pursuant to Section 31 of Act 327 of the Public Acts of 1945, Public Act 254 of 2020, and recommendations to prevent the spread of Covid-19, the Commissioners of the Michigan Aeronautics Commission (MAC) met via video conference call, on Thursday, January 21, 2021. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT and LOCATION ATTENDING FROM Rick Fiddler, Chair – Ada, Michigan Russ Kavalhuna, Vice Chair – Dearborn, Michigan Dr. Brian Smith, Commissioner – Detroit, Michigan Roger Salo, Commissioner – Plymouth, Michigan Kelly Burris, Commissioner – Pleasant Ridge, Michigan Brig. Gen, Bryan Teff, Designee MDMVA – Lansing, Michigan Laura Mester, Designee MDOT – Clinton County, Michigan Kevin Jacobs, Designee MDNR – Roscommon, Michigan F/Lt. Brian Bahlau, Designee MSP – Lansing, Michigan Mike Trout, Director – Clarklake, Michigan Bryan Budds, Commission Advisor – Howell, Michigan Alicia Morrison, Commission Analyst – Lansing, Michigan COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT None I. OPENING REMARKS Director Mike Trout began by explaining the meeting was being held via video conference call in accordance with recommendations to slow the spread of COVID-19. He welcomed all who were participating and thanked the Commissioners for coming together in the virtual format. He then turned the meeting over to Chairperson Rick Fiddler. The January 21, 2021 MAC meeting was officially called to order by Chair Rick Fiddler at 10:02 am. Chair Fiddler thanked the Commissioners and all in attendance on the call for participating. He then led the attendees in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Chair Fiddler asked for a formal roll call. Roll call was taken. It was announced all nine (9) Commissioners were present for a quorum. -
Monroe County Streamlining Guide
Prepared by the Monroe County Economic Development Corporation Revised March 2018 Table of Contents Monroe County Board of Commissioners ......................................................................... i Monroe County Economic Development Corporation ..................................................... i Monroe County Economic Development Corporation ..................................................... ii Streamlining Development Task Force .............................................................................. ii Streamlining Development User’s Guide .......................................................................... iii Mission Statement ............................................................................................................. iii Goals ................................................................................................................................... iii Keeping this Guide Up to Date ..........................................................................................iv 1. Partnership Pledge ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Streamlining Development Partnership Signatories ......................................................1-1 2. Partnership Assistance & Web Links .............................................................................. 2-1 County & State Organizations ......................................................................................... 2-1 Monroe County Municipalities -
10468-WCAA Report.Qxd
ALTITUDE Gaining through New Leadership and Growth WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY Report to Key Stakeholders VISION STATEMENT MISSION STATEMENT “To be the best major hub and “To build and maintain, through teamwork, reliever airports in the world.” innovation and dedication, the safest, friendliest, cleanest, most convenient airports in the world.” VALUES Safety and Security We maintain our facilities and conduct our operations in the safest possible manner. We are vigilant about the safety and security of the traveling public, our tenants and our employees. Quality/Customer Service We provide world-class facilities that are properly maintained to ensure a positive travel experience. Employees are respectful, courteous and helpful at all times to our customers. Professionalism (Learning/Conduct/Work Ethic/Respect/Attitude) We employ, develop and retain employees motivated to achieve the mission and vision of the organization. We treat each employee with the same respect that we expect to receive. We recognize and embrace our common interests as well as our differences. Integrity/Honesty We will perform our duties in an exemplary manner, making the best possible business decisions for the users and stakeholders of the Airports. Efficiency (Cost Effective/Streamlined Processes) We manage the facilities and operations of the Airports in a manner that is consistent with the best practices of the industry. We strive to provide a seamless experience for the traveling public, ensure value and quality for our tenants, and meet the needs of our employees. Innovation (Best Practices) We establish and use the best practices and standards available. We are committed to using our resources to provide the best possible travel experience and highest level of customer satisfaction. -
Columbus Regional Airport Authority
COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY - PORT COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRAFFIC REPORT June 2014 7/22/2014 Airline Enplaned Passengers Deplaned Passengers Enplaned Air Mail Deplaned Air Mail Enplaned Air Freight Deplaned Air Freight Landings Landed Weight Air Canada Express - Regional 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 Air Canada Express Totals 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 AirTran 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 AirTran Totals 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 American 21,754 22,200 - - - 306 174 22,210,000 Envoy Air** 22,559 22,530 - - 2 ,027 2 ,873 527 27,043,010 American Totals 44,313 44,730 - - 2,027 3,179 701 49,253,010 Delta 38,216 36,970 29,594 34,196 25,984 36,845 278 38,899,500 Delta Connection - ExpressJet 2,888 2,292 - - - - 55 3,709,300 Delta Connection - Chautauqua 15,614 14,959 - - 640 - 374 15,913,326 Delta Connection - Endeavor 4 ,777 4,943 - - - - 96 5,776,500 Delta Connection - GoJet 874 748 - - 33 - 21 1,407,000 Delta Connection - Shuttle America 6,440 7,877 - - 367 - 143 10,536,277 Delta Connection - SkyWest 198 142 - - - - 4 188,000 Delta Totals 69,007 67,931 29,594 34,196 27,024 36,845 971 76,429,903 Southwest 97,554 96,784 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 Southwest Totals 97,554 96,784 - - 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 United 3 ,411 3,370 13,718 6 ,423 1 ,294 8 ,738 30 3,990,274 United Express - ExpressJet 13,185 13,319 - - - - 303 13,256,765 United Express - Mesa 27 32 - - - - 1 67,000 United Express - Republic 4,790 5,133 - - - - 88 5,456,000 United Express - Shuttle America 9,825 9,076 - - - - 151 10,919,112 -
Delta April 2003 Worldwide Timetable
Airline Listing 3M Silver Airways Corporation KE Korean Air Lines Co. Ltd. 6G Sun Air Express, LLC KL KLM Royal Dutch Airlines AA American Airlines LH Deutsche Lufthansa AG AC Air Canada LW Pacific Wings, L.L.C AF Air France NH All Nippon Airways AM Aeromexico Aerovias OS Austrian Airlines AG dba Austrian de Mexico S.A. de C.V. PD Porter Airlines Inc. AS Alaska Airlines QR Qatar Airways (Q.C.S.C.) AV Aerovias del Continente Americano SA South African Airways S.A. AVIANCA SK Scandinavian Airlines System B6 Jetblue Airways Corporation SN Brussels Airlines N.V. BA British Airways SU JSC Aeroflot Russian Airlines CA Air China Limited SV Saudi Arabian Airlines CM Compania Panamena SY MN Airlines LLC de Aviacion, S.A. (COPA) TK Turkish Airlines, Inc. DL Delta Air Lines, Inc. UA United Airlines, Inc. EK Emirates US US Airways ET Ethiopian Airlines Enterprise VS Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited EY Etihad Airways VX Virgin America Inc. F9 Frontier Airlines, Inc. WN Southwest Airlines FI Icelandair DOMESTIC DOMESTIC Stops/ Stops/ Stops/ Stops/ Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq Depart/Arrive Flight Equip Via Freq AKRON/CANTON, OH (CAK) To AKRON/CANTON, OH (CAK) From AKRON/CANTON, OH (CAK) To ALBUQUERQUE, NM (cont) From ALBUQUERQUE, NM (cont) From National To National From Dulles (cont) To Dulles (cont) 2 00p 3 20p US5151* CRJ 0 6 6 30a 7 42a US5226* CRJ 0 7 12 31p 4 56p UA1090/UA4914* DEN 125 1 10p 9 02p UA3655*/UA652 DEN 6 Operated By US Airways Express - PSA Airlines Operated -
General Aviation Activity and Airport Facilities
New Hampshire State Airport System Plan Update CHAPTER 2 - AIRPORT SYSTEM INVENTORY 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the existing airport system in New Hampshire as of the end of 2001 and early 2002 and served as the database for the overall System Plan. As such, it was updated throughout the course of the study. This Chapter focuses on the aviation infrastructure that makes up the system of airports in the State, as well as aviation activity, airport facilities, airport financing, airspace and air traffic services, as well as airport access. Chapter 3 discusses the general economic conditions within the regions and municipalities that are served by the airport system. The primary purpose of this data collection and analysis was to provide a comprehensive overview of the aviation system and its key elements. These elements also served as the basis for the subsequent recommendations presented for the airport system. The specific topics covered in this Chapter include: S Data Collection Process S Airport Descriptions S Airport Financing S Airport System Structure S Airspace and Navigational Aids S Capital Improvement Program S Definitions S Scheduled Air Service Summary S Environmental Factors 2.2 DATA COLLECTION PROCESS The data collection was accomplished through a multi-step process that included cataloging existing relevant literature and data, and conducting individual airport surveys and site visits. Division of Aeronautics provided information from their files that included existing airport master plans, FAA Form 5010 Airport Master Records, financial information, and other pertinent data. Two important element of the data collection process included visits to each of the system airports, as well as surveys of airport managers and users. -
Piedmont Airlines Internships
Piedmont Airlines Internships Piedmont Airlines, a wholly owned subsidiary of American Airlines (formerly US Airways), offers 2 paid internships per semester in their Safety department. • Winter (usually January – April), • Summer (May – August) and • Fall (September – December) A few other details to note: - Actual internship dates vary based on each individual intern and their school requirements. - Along with exposure to Safety Programs, the positions include regular data entry and clerical work. - Interns are expected to work normal business hours Monday – Friday weekly. - All candidates must be legally able to work in the United States. We do not sponsor anyone due to the short period of employment. - The intern has the ability to fly as a non-revenue passenger during the course of their internship which includes all flights within the American Airlines system. - We do not provide housing assistance and each position requires the intern to supply their ground transportation as there is no available public transportation to either office. The Fall internship resumes and cover letters need to be submitted through http://piedmont- airlines.com/Careers by July 17th for consideration. Please email any questions to [email protected]. Safety Internship Job Description Job Title: Operational Safety Intern (Based in Middletown, PA) Organization: Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (d.b.a. US Airways Express and American Eagle) Dates of Position: Available Every Semester Time Commitment: Monday – Friday, Regular Business Hours Summary of Position: Assist in achieving the corporate mission of providing a safe environment for employees and customers. Interns will have the opportunity to learn about and be exposed to each function of an airline safety department. -
Pilot 1 Watch the Flightdeck for Information About the Airline Piloting Profession and Airline Aviation News
SeasonPage 22 of Ice ALPA Testifies Known There’s an App On NextGen Crewmember For That Page 17 Update Page 26 Page 20 November 2011 Air Line Pilot 1 Watch The FlightDeck for information about the airline piloting profession and airline aviation news. Simply scan the QR code with your phone, sit back, and enjoy. flightdeck.alpa.org We’ll ask you a question from each episode, and you can send in your answer for a chance to win a Sennheiser HMEC 26-T headset valued at $850. Enter to win at flightdeck.alpa.org. New to QR technology? Down load a QR reader to your phone, scan the code, and watch The FlightDeck. A member service of Air Line Pilot. NOVEMBER 2011 • VOluME 80, NuMBER 9 22 34 Cleared to Dream First Aviation-themed High School Breaks Ground in Seattle 35 Our Stories Pilot Does Double Duty as ) Community Firefighter icronesia M 36 Shaping History IR A Excerpts from Flying the Line I and II ontinental (C 37 The landing rown 38 We Are AlPA Y L. B Y L. ALPA Resources and EFFRE About the Cover . J . Contact Numbers apt C As winter approaches, an all-too- familiar picture: a United B-757- 222 undergoing COMMENTARY deicing before taxiing at JFK. 5 Aviation Matters Photo by F/O What Would Steve Jobs Do? Josef R. Kunzel (United). To view 6 Weighing In a page-turning Turning the Corner version of this issue, scan the QR code with your smartphone. FEATURES New to this technology? Download a QR reader to your 17 AlPA: Future smartphone, scan the code, of u.S. -
Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2010
Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2010 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2010/11 2009/10 % + / ( - ) 2010 2009 % + / ( - ) Enplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 25,519 19,792 28.9% 25,519 19,792 28.9% 123,342 106,591 15.7% American Airlines 16,593 16,140 2.8% 16,593 16,140 2.8% 107,297 86,244 24.4% Continental Airlines 14,658 14,288 2.6% 14,658 14,288 2.6% 94,379 98,856 (4.5%) Delta Airlines 36,317 19,603 85.3% 36,317 19,603 85.3% 184,669 117,759 56.8% Frontier Airlines 15,931 12,687 25.6% 15,931 12,687 25.6% 84,949 73,540 15.5% Hawaiian Airlines 7,536 7,616 (1.1%) 7,536 7,616 (1.1%) 49,307 50,683 (2.7%) Horizon Air 13,753 12,058 14.1% 13,753 12,058 14.1% 81,296 71,717 13.4% Jet Blue 10,453 10,669 (2.0%) 10,453 10,669 (2.0%) 64,002 53,048 20.6% Mesa/US Airways Express/YV 753 - 753 - 2,821 - Northwest - 13,184 (100.0%) - 13,184 (100.0%) - 66,533 (100.0%) Skywest/Delta Connection 5,818 5,689 2.3% 5,818 5,689 2.3% 31,982 30,524 4.8% Skywest/United Express 15,635 13,611 14.9% 15,635 13,611 14.9% 107,786 92,425 16.6% Southwest 205,786 214,471 (4.0%) 205,786 214,471 (4.0%) 1,380,693 1,410,965 (2.1%) United Airlines 29,249 32,626 (10.4%) 29,249 32,626 (10.4%) 173,518 199,056 (12.8%) US Airways 25,755 29,462 (12.6%) 25,755 29,462 (12.6%) 129,309 166,358 (22.3%) CHARTER - - - - - - 423,756 421,896 0.4% 423,756 421,896 0.4% 2,615,350 2,624,299 (0.3%) International Mexicana 5,303 6,524 (18.7%) 5,303 6,524 (18.7%) 33,480 32,327 3.6% 5,303 6,524 (18.7%) 5,303 6,524