DOCSLIB.ORG

19. Yüzyilda Osmanli Devleti'nin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
19. Yüzyilda Osmanli Devleti'nin T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANA BİLİM DALI 19. YÜZYILDA OSMANLI DEVLETİ’NİN İDARİ TAKSİMATI (1839-1914) DOKTORA TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Prof. Dr. Ahmet AKSIN Ela ÖZKAN ELAZIĞ-2017 II ÖZET Doktora Tezi 19. Yüzyılda Osmanlı Devleti’nin İdari Taksimatı (1839-1914) Ela ÖZKAN Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı Yakınçağ Tarihi Bilim Dalı Elazığ-2017, Sayfa: XXVIII+263 İdari yapı bir devletin temel birimidir. Bu birimin yanlış yapılanması ve işleyişi idari düzenin bozulmasında belirleyici bir etkendir. Bu nedenle bir devlet idari sistemini oluştururken idari taksimat birimlerini de doğru biçimlendirdiği sürece, güçlü ve sağlam bir idari sistemin temelleri atılır. Osmanlı Devleti de kurulduğu ilk yıllardan itibaren idari yapısını sürekli yenileyerek varlığını uzun süre korumayı başarmıştır. 19.yy dan itibaren ise siyasi vaziyetten kaynaklanan iç ve dış etkenler ile idari taksimat yeniden şekillenmiştir. Hazırladığımız tez 19.yy Osmanlı Devleti idari taksimat birimlerini yıllar arasındaki değişikliklerle ortaya çıkarmayı hedeflemiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: 19.yy, İdari Taksimat, Vilayet, Sancak III ABSTRACT Doctorate Thesis Administrative Division of The Ottoman Empire in the 19th Century (1839-1914) Ela ÖZKAN The University of Fırat The Institute of Social Science The Depertment of History Elazığ-2017, Page: XXVIII+263 Administirative system is the basic unit of the state. The wrong structure and functioning of the administrative system, has been a determining factor in the deterioration of the administrative order. Therefore, as long as the correct format while determining the administrative territorial units of the state administrative system, the foundations of a strong and robust administrative system will be taken. From the first years of the Ottoman Empire also established its presence by constantly innovative administrative structure has been successful for a long time protection. From the 19th century, internal and external factors resulting from the political situation and the administrative division have been reshaped. The thesis we prepared, aims to reveal the administrative divisions of the Ottoman State in the 19th century through changes between years. Key Words: 19. Century, Administrative Division, Province, Starboard IV İÇİNDEKİLER ÖZET .............................................................................................................................. II ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. III İÇİNDEKİLER ............................................................................................................. IV TABLOLAR LİSTESİ ................................................................................................. XI HARİTALAR LİSTESİ ......................................................................................... XVIII ÖNSÖZ ........................................................................................................................ XX KISALTMALAR .................................................................................................... XXIII KONU VE KAYNAKLAR ...................................................................................... XXV GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................... 1 I. OSMANLI DEVLETİ’NİN İDARİ TAKSİMAT BİRİMLERİ ................................ 1 II. TANZİMAT ÖNCESİNDE OSMANLI DEVLETİ’NİN İDARİ YAPISINA GENEL BAKIŞ ............................................................................................................. 3 III. 1839 TANZİMAT FERMANI VE İDARİ TEŞKİLATA ETKİSİ ......................... 8 IV. 1840 MUHASILLIK TEŞKİLATI VE İDARİ TAKSİMATTA DEĞİŞİM ........ 11 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM 1. OSMANLI DEVLETİ İDARİ TAKSİMATI (1839-1850) .................................... 19 1.1. 1839- 1850 Tarihleri Arasında Osmanlı Devleti’nin İdari Taksimatı .................. 19 1.1.1. Anadolu Eyaleti ............................................................................................. 21 1.1.2. Adana Eyaleti ................................................................................................ 24 1.1.3. Ankara Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 25 1.1.4. Aydın Eyaleti ................................................................................................. 27 1.1.5. Bağdat Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 28 1.1.6. Belgrad Eyaleti .............................................................................................. 29 1.1.7. Bolu Eyaleti ................................................................................................... 30 1.1.8. Bosna Eyaleti ................................................................................................. 31 1.1.9. Boğdan Eyaleti .............................................................................................. 32 1.1.10. Cezayir-i Bahri-i Sefid Eyaleti .................................................................... 33 1.1.11. Çıldır Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 35 1.1.12. Diyarbakır Eyaleti ....................................................................................... 36 1.1.13. Erzurum Eyaleti ........................................................................................... 38 1.1.14. Edirne Eyaleti .............................................................................................. 39 V 1.1.15. Eflak Eyaleti ................................................................................................ 40 1.1.16. Girit Eyaleti ................................................................................................. 41 1.1.17. Halep Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 42 1.1.18. Habeş Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 43 1.1.19. Hüdavendigar Eyaleti .................................................................................. 44 1.1.20. Harput Eyaleti .............................................................................................. 45 1.1.21. Kars Eyaleti ................................................................................................. 47 1.1.22. Konya (Karaman) Eyaleti ............................................................................ 48 1.1.23. Kandiye Eyaleti ........................................................................................... 49 1.1.24. Kastamonu Eyaleti ....................................................................................... 50 1.1.25. Kürdistan Eyaleti ......................................................................................... 51 1.1.26. Maraş Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 53 1.1.27. Musul Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 54 1.1.28. Mısır Eyaleti ................................................................................................ 55 1.1.29. Niş Eyaleti ................................................................................................... 56 1.1.30. Rumeli Eyaleti ............................................................................................. 56 1.1.31. Rakka Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 57 1.1.32. Sayda Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 59 1.1.33. Selanik Eyaleti ............................................................................................. 60 1.1.34. Silistire Eyaleti ............................................................................................ 61 1.1.35. Sivas Eyaleti ................................................................................................ 61 1.1.36. Sırp Eyaleti .................................................................................................. 62 1.1.37. Şehri-Zor Eyaleti ......................................................................................... 64 1.1.38. Şam Eyaleti .................................................................................................. 65 1.1.39. Trabzon Eyaleti ........................................................................................... 67 1.1.40. Trablusgarp Eyaleti ..................................................................................... 67 1.1.41. Trablusşam Eyaleti ...................................................................................... 68 1.1.42. Tunus Eyaleti ............................................................................................... 69 1.1.43. Üsküp Eyaleti .............................................................................................. 70 1.1.44. Van Eyaleti .................................................................................................. 70 1.1.45. Vidin Eyaleti ................................................................................................ 71 1.1.46. Yanya Eyaleti .............................................................................................. 72 VI 1.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cole Collection
    THE COLE COLLECTION If you would like more information on the collection or would like to access one of the documents, please send an email to [email protected] with the accompanying file number. A Zoryan Institute representative will get back to you within 48 hours. _________________________________________________________ THE COLE COLLECTION Journals, Letters, Lectures, Documents, Photographs, and Artifacts of Royal M. Cole and Lizzie C. Cole American Missionaries in Armenian and Kurdistan Turkey in the years 1868-1908 (c) 1996, M. Malicoat --------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS --------------- I. Royal Cole's journals: (a) Bound copy-book journals . p. 1 (b) Three smaller journals: 1. ‘Erzeroom Journal: War Times, 1877 - 1878’ . p. 7 2. ‘Travel Reminiscences’ . p. 7 3. Royal Cole’s personal diary of 1896: events at Bitlis, Van, and Moush; the Knapp affair: the persecution of American missionaries; relief work for Garjgan refugees . p. 7 II. Royal Cole’s copy-book journals: loose sheets: (a) Handwritten . p. 8 (b) Typed . p. 12 III. Drafts and notes for two projected volumes by Rev. Cole: (a) Dr. Cole’s Memoirs: ‘Interior Turkey Reminiscences, Forty Years in Kourdistan (Armenia)’ . p. 14 (b) ‘The Siege of Erzroom’; miscellaneous notes on The Russo-Turkish War . p. 15 IV. Newspaper articles by Royal Cole; miscellaneous newspaper articles on the subject of Armenian Turkey, in English, by various writers . p. 16 V. Lectures, essays, and letters by Mrs. Cole (Lizzie Cobleigh Cole) (a) Lectures . p. 17 (b) Copy-book journal loose-sheet essays and copy-book journal entries . p. 19 (c) Letters . p. 20 VI. Massacres in the Bitlis and Van provinces, 1894 - 1896: Sasun; Ghelieguzan; Moush; Garjgan sancak: charts, lists, maps .
    [Show full text]
  • Ayaş'in Xix.Yüzyil Ortalarinda Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Yapisi
    AYAŞ’IN XIX.YÜZYIL ORTALARINDA SOSYAL VE EKONOMİK YAPISI ÜZERİNE TESPİTLER VE SONUÇLAR Şennur ŞENEL-Ali Fuat KARAMAN Özet Bu çalışmada Ankara iline bağlı Ayaş kazasının 19. yüzyıl ortalarındaki sosyal ve ekonomik yapısı, döneme ait temettuat defterleri kullanılarak ortaya konulmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmanın metodunu oluşturan ana unsur, Türk Tarih Kurumu çatısı altında 1995–2000 yılları arasında yapılan Tüsoktar projesi kapsamında yer alan çalışmada oluşturulmuş veri tabanı sistemidir. Bu sistem kullanılarak Ayaş’a ait temettuat defterlerindeki veriler, söz konusu veri tabanına girilmiş ve daha sonra sorgulanmıştır. Sonuçta elde edilen rakamlar, gerek temettuat verileriyle ilgilenen araştırmacılar, gerekse genel itibariyle Osmanlı sosyal ve ekonomi tarihi ile ilgilenen akademisyenlerin bilgilerine sunulmaktadır. Bu çerçevede başlıklar altında incelediğimiz konular şu şekildedir: Kazanın 19.yüzyıl ikinci yarısındaki idari yapısı ve yerleşim düzeni, aynı dönemde kazanın nüfusuna ait tespitler, çalışma hayatı ve buna bağlı olarak gelir dağılımı ile taşınır ve taşınmaz mülklerin nüfusa göre dağılımları, kazada yapılan hayvancılık. Nihai olarak da bütün bu gelir kalemlerine bağlı olarak kazanın Osmanlı vergi düzenindeki yeri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Anahtar kelimleler: Ayaş (Ankara), Osmanlı sosyal ve ekonomik hayatı(19. yüzyıl) , temettuat defterleri. Findings and Conclutions on the Socio-Economic Structure of the Town of Ayaş (Ayasch) in the Midst of 19th Century Absract This study puts before you the socio-economic structure of the town of Ayaş, appertaining to Ankara city, in the midst of 19th century following a perusal over the inventories about the collected taxes on the earnings of people in that time. The main element that formulates the method of this study is the database system that was created in the framework of Tüsoktar Project that was carried out by the Turkish Historical Society (TTK) in the years between 1995 and 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Pax Britannica and the Anti-Systemic Movement of Viceroy Mehmet Ali Pasha of Egypt
    PAX BRITANNICA AND THE ANTI-SYSTEMIC MOVEMENT OF VICEROY MEHMET ALI PASHA OF EGYPT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY OKYANUS AKIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DECEMBER 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kondakçı Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Oktay Tanrısever Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Çınar Özen (Ankara Uni., IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Okyanus Akın Signature: iii ABSTRACT PAX BRITANNICA AND THE ANTI-SYSTEMIC MOVEMENT OF VICEROY MEHMET ALI PASHA OF EGYPT Akın, Okyanus M.S., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur December 2019, 234 pages The Pax Britannica, as a system, defined the political-economy of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • TANZIMAT in the PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) and LOCAL COUNCILS in the OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840S to 1860S)
    TANZIMAT IN THE PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) AND LOCAL COUNCILS IN THE OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840s TO 1860s) Dissertation zur Erlangung der Würde einer Doktorin der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Historischen Fakultät der Universität Basel von ANNA VAKALIS aus Thessaloniki, Griechenland Basel, 2019 Buchbinderei Bommer GmbH, Basel Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentenserver der Universität Basel edoc.unibas.ch ANNA VAKALIS, ‘TANZIMAT IN THE PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) AND LOCAL COUNCILS IN THE OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840s TO 1860s)’ Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Historischen Fakultät der Universität Basel, auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Maurus Reinkowski und Assoc. Prof. Dr. Yonca Köksal (Koç University, Istanbul). Basel, den 05/05/2017 Der Dekan Prof. Dr. Thomas Grob 2 ANNA VAKALIS, ‘TANZIMAT IN THE PROVINCE: NATIONALIST SEDITION (FESAT), BANDITRY (EŞKİYA) AND LOCAL COUNCILS IN THE OTTOMAN SOUTHERN BALKANS (1840s TO 1860s)’ TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………..…….…….….7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………...………..………8-9 NOTES ON PLACES……………………………………………………….……..….10 INTRODUCTION -Rethinking the Tanzimat........................................................................................................11-19 -Ottoman Province(s) in the Balkans………………………………..…….………...19-25 -Agency in Ottoman Society................…..............................................................................25-35 CHAPTER 1: THE STATE SETTING THE STAGE: Local Councils
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • Talaat Pasha's Report on the Armenian Genocide.Fm
    Gomidas Institute Studies Series TALAAT PASHA’S REPORT ON THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE by Ara Sarafian Gomidas Institute London This work originally appeared as Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1917. It has been revised with some changes, including a new title. Published by Taderon Press by arrangement with the Gomidas Institute. © 2011 Ara Sarafian. All Rights Reserved. ISBN 978-1-903656-66-2 Gomidas Institute 42 Blythe Rd. London W14 0HA United Kingdom Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction by Ara Sarafian 5 Map 18 TALAAT PASHA’S 1917 REPORT Opening Summary Page: Data and Calculations 20 WESTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 22 Constantinople 23 Edirne vilayet 24 Chatalja mutasarriflik 25 Izmit mutasarriflik 26 Hudavendigar (Bursa) vilayet 27 Karesi mutasarriflik 28 Kala-i Sultaniye (Chanakkale) mutasarriflik 29 Eskishehir vilayet 30 Aydin vilayet 31 Kutahya mutasarriflik 32 Afyon Karahisar mutasarriflik 33 Konia vilayet 34 Menteshe mutasarriflik 35 Teke (Antalya) mutasarriflik 36 CENTRAL PROVINCES (MAP) 37 Ankara (Angora) vilayet 38 Bolu mutasarriflik 39 Kastamonu vilayet 40 Janik (Samsun) mutasarriflik 41 Nigde mutasarriflik 42 Kayseri mutasarriflik 43 Adana vilayet 44 Ichil mutasarriflik 45 EASTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 46 Sivas vilayet 47 Erzerum vilayet 48 Bitlis vilayet 49 4 Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide Van vilayet 50 Trebizond vilayet 51 Mamuretulaziz (Elazig) vilayet 52 SOUTH EASTERN PROVINCES AND RESETTLEMENT ZONE (MAP) 53 Marash mutasarriflik 54 Aleppo (Halep) vilayet 55 Urfa mutasarriflik 56 Diyarbekir vilayet
    [Show full text]
  • Political and Economic Transition of Ottoman Sovereignty from a Sole Monarch to Numerous Ottoman Elites, 1683–1750S
    Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. Volume 70 (1), 49 – 90 (2017) DOI: 10.1556/062.2017.70.1.4 POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION OF OTTOMAN SOVEREIGNTY FROM A SOLE MONARCH TO NUMEROUS OTTOMAN ELITES, 1683–1750S BIROL GÜNDOĞDU Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Historisches Institut, Osteuropäische Geschichte Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10, Haus D Raum 205, 35394 Gießen, Deutschland e-mail: [email protected] The aim of this paper is to reveal the transformation of the Ottoman Empire following the debacles of the second siege of Vienna in 1683. The failures compelled the Ottoman state to change its socio- economic and political structure. As a result of this transition of the state structure, which brought about a so-called “redistribution of power” in the empire, new Ottoman elites emerged from 1683 until the 1750s. We have divided the above time span into three stages that will greatly help us com- prehend the Ottoman transition from sultanic authority to numerous autonomies of first Muslim, then non-Muslim elites of the Ottoman Empire. During the first period (1683–1699) we see the emergence of Muslim power players at the expense of sultanic authority. In the second stage (1699–1730) we observe the sultans’ unsuccessful attempts to revive their authority. In the third period (1730–1750) we witness the emergence of non-Muslim notables who gradually came into power with the help of both the sultans and external powers. At the end of this last stage, not only did the authority of Ottoman sultans decrease enormously, but a new era evolved where Muslim and non-Muslim leading figures both fought and co-operated with one another for a new distribution of wealth in the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodrow Wilson Boundary Between Turkey and Armenia
    WOODROW WILSON BOUNDARY BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA The publication of this book is sponsored by HYKSOS Foundation for the memory of General ANDRANIK – hero of the ARMENIAN NATION. Arbitral Award of the President of the United States of America Woodrow Wilson Full Report of the Committee upon the Arbitration of the Boundary between Turkey and Armenia. Washington, November 22nd, 1920. Prepared with an introduction by Ara Papian. Includes indices. Technical editor: Davit O. Abrahamyan ISBN 978-9939-50-160-4 Printed by “Asoghik” Publishing House Published in Armenia www.wilsonforarmenia.org © Ara Papian, 2011. All rights reserved. This book is dedicated to all who support Armenia in their daily lives, wherever they may live, with the hope that the information contained in this book will be of great use and value in advocating Armenia’s cause. Woodrow Wilson (December 28, 1856 – February 3, 1924) 28th President of the United States of America (March 4, 1913 – March 4, 1921) ARBITRAL AWARD OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WOODROW WILSON FULL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE UPON THE ARBITRATION OF THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA WASHINGTON, NOVEMBER 22ND, 1920 PREPARED with an introduction by ARA PAPIAN Yerevan – 2011 Y Z There was a time when every American schoolboy knew of Armenia, the entire proceeds of the Yale-Harvard Game (1916) were donated to the relief of “the starving Armenians,” and President Woodrow Wilson’s arbitration to determine the border between Armenia and Ottoman Turkey was seen as natural, given the high standing the 28th President enjoyed in the Old World.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from Vidin: a Study of Ottoman Governmentality and Politics of Local Administration, 1864-1877
    LETTERS FROM VIDIN: A STUDY OF OTTOMAN GOVERNMENTALITY AND POLITICS OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, 1864-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Mehmet Safa Saracoglu ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Carter Vaughn Findley, Adviser Professor Jane Hathaway ______________________ Professor Kenneth Andrien Adviser History Graduate Program Copyright by Mehmet Safa Saracoglu 2007 ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the local administrative practices in Vidin County during 1860s and 1870s. Vidin County, as defined by the Ottoman Provincial Regulation of 1864, is the area that includes the districts of Vidin (the administrative center), ‛Adliye (modern-day Kula), Belgradcık (Belogradchik), Berkofça (Bergovitsa), İvraca (Vratsa), Rahova (Rahovo), and Lom (Lom), all of which are located in modern-day Bulgaria. My focus is mostly on the post-1864 period primarily due to the document utilized for this dissertation: the copy registers of the county administrative council in Vidin. Doing a close reading of these copy registers together with other primary and secondary sources this dissertation analyzes the politics of local administration in Vidin as a case study to understand the Ottoman governmentality in the second half of the nineteenth century. The main thesis of this study contends that the local inhabitants of Vidin effectively used the institutional framework of local administration ii in this period of transformation in order to devise strategies that served their interests. This work distances itself from an understanding of the nineteenth-century local politics as polarized between a dominating local government trying to impose unprecedented reforms designed at the imperial center on the one hand, and an oppressed but nevertheless resistant people, rebelling against the insensitive policies of the state on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • The World War and the Turco-Armenian Question
    THE WORLD WAR AND THE TURCO-ARMENIAN QUESTION BY AHMED RUSTEM BEY Formerly Turkish Ambassador in Washington Berne 1918 translated by Stephen Cambron PERSONAL EXPLANATION OF THE AUTHOR The son of a Pole, who having been harbored in Turkey after the Hungarian abortive Revolution of 1848, served this country as an officer and was the object of government favors till his death, I was infeoffed to the Turkish people as much out of thankfulness as because of their numerous, amiable qualities. In writing this book intended to defend turkey against the Western public opinion concerning the Turco-Armenian question, I have only given way to my grateful feelings towards the country where I was born and which made me, in my turn, the object of her benevolence. These feelings expressed themselves by acts of indubitable loyalty and there is they reason why I fought twice in duel to maintain her honor and served her as a volunteer during the Turco-Greek War. It is after having ended my career and assured a long time ago of the kind feelings of the Ottoman Government and of my Turkish fellowmen’s that I publish this work under my name. Thereby I mean to say that I am only obeying my love towards the country. As to the degree of conviction with which I put my pen to her service in this discussion, where the question is to prove that Turkey is not so guilty as report goes and in which passions are roused to the utmost is sufficiently fixed by my signing this defense in which I speak the plain truth to the Armenian committees and the Entente.
    [Show full text]
  • KATRE SAYI 4 .Indd
    Hadis Özel Sayısı • Yıl: 2017 Sayı: 4 GASTUMANNA’DAN KASTAMONYA’YA BİR ŞEHİR O. Erdal ŞAHİN Uludağ Üniversitesi Özet Kastamonu Kuzey Anadolu’nun engebeli bir coğrafyasında kadim geçmişi olan bir şehirdir. Anadolu’nun birçok şehri gibi eski bir tarihe sahip olan Kastamonu çeşitli devletlerin ve kültürlerin özelliklerini barındırmıştır. Şehrin adı kendisi gibi eski dönemlere kadar gider. Mekânsal olarak Hititlerden Romalılara, Bey- likler döneminden Osmanlı ve Cumhuriyete kadar zengin bir hafızaya sahip- tir. Bu çalışmada Kastamonu’nun tarihsel süreçlerde geçirmiş olduğu yönetsel, mekânsal ve kültürel gelişimleri ele alınmış ve kendisine has geleneksel yapıları yanında siyasal ve kültürel yönleri incelenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Kastamonu, Şehir, Kültür, Vilayet Şehrin Siyasi Tarihçesi Karadeniz bölgesinin batı kısmında yer alan Kastamonu ilk olarak adını Gas’ların şehri anlamına gelen Gas ve Tumanna kelimelerinden oluşan ‘Gastumanna’ isminden dönüşerek almıştır. Şehir, ismini Bizans hanedanı Komenlerden aldığı da rivayet edit- lir. Komenlerin Kalesi anlamına gelen Castra Comneni isminden dönüşerek Castam- bol ve Castamouni şeklinde anılmıştır.1 Osmanlı dönemine ait bazı seyhatnamelerde ise Kestomuniya, Kastamonya olarak ifade edilse de Kâtip Çelebi bu şehri Kastamoni şeklinde ifade etmiştir. Osmanlı devrinde ki resmi yazışmalarda Kastamoni olarak geçen şehrin adı Cumhuriyet döneminde Kastamonu olarak resmileştirilmiştir.2 1 Kemal Kutgün Eyüpgiller, Bir Kent Tarihi Kastamonu, Eren Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 1999, s.37. 2 Türkiye Ansiklopedisi, Kaynak Kitaplar Yayını, Cilt 3, İstanbul, 1975, s.892. 247 Gastumanna’dan Kastamonya’ya Bir Şehir / Erdal ŞAHİN Kastamonu coğrafi yapısının dağlık olması sebebiyle ilk çağlardan beri Anado- lu’nun önemli ulaşım yollarının dışında kalmış ve birçok istilalardan korunmuştur. Gölköy Enstitüsünün çevresinde yapılan araştırmalarda Kastamonu’da ki yerleşim ilk çağa kadar gittiği anlaşılmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Fables Which L•Re- Ent a Summary of the Finance and Commerce of the Unit
    INDEX THIS Index contains no reference to the Introductory 'fables which l•re• ent a summary of the Finance and Commerce of the United Kingdom, British India., the British Colanies, the various countries of Europe, the United States of America, and Japan, and various other matters, as well as Additions and Con-ections ; nor will reference to such topics as Gold, Wheat, &c., be found otherwise than under the producing countries. AAC AFG ACHEN (Prussia), 829 Achaia, 920 A Aalborg (Denmark), 725 Achole (Uganda), 174 Au.len (Wurtemberg}, 915 Acklin's Island (Baha.mas), 264 Aalesund (Norwu.y), 1064 Aconcagua (Chili), 676 Aargu.u (cu.nton), 1249, 1251 Acre Ter. (Brazil), 659 Aarhus (Denmu.rk), 725 Adana (vilayet), 1266, 1275 Abaca Islu.nd (Baham&l!}, 264 Adelaide, 281, 312 ; University, Abu.ngarez mines (Costa Rica), 714 313 Abbas Hilmi, Khedive, 1287 Aden, 99. 119 ; boundary, 99, 12 Abeokuta (W. Africa), 230 Adis Ababa, 563 Abercorn (Rhodesia), 192 Adjame (Ivory Coast), 807 Aberdeen, 19; University, 28, 29 Admiralty Island (W. Pacific), 863 Aberystwith College, 29 Adolf Friedrich (Grand-duke, Meck- Abeshr (Wadai), 797 lenburg-Strelitz), 888 Abo (Finlu.nd), 1163, 1164, 1186 Adrar (Spanish Sahara), 1229 Abomey, 808 Adriu.nople (town), 1267 Abrnzzi e M.olise, 946 - (vilayet), 1266 Abuua. (Coptic), 664 Adua (Abyssinia), 564 Abyssinia, area, 663 lEgean Islands, 924 -army, 663 Afghanistan, area, 567, 568 - books of reference, 666-6 : - army, 568-9 - commerce, 664-6 - books of reference, 570 - education, 664 - commerce, 569-70 -gold, 564 - currency,
    [Show full text]