Milch Casefertig.Rtf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Milch Casefertig.Rtf TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS BEFORE THE NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNALS UNDER CONTROL COUNCIL LAW No. 10 VOLUME II NUERNBERG OCTOBER 1946-APRIL 1949 ________ For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $2.75 (Buckram "The Milch Case " CASE NO. 2 MILITARY TRIBUNAL NO. II THE UNITED STATES OP AMERICA —against — ERHARD MILCH VII.JUDGMENT........................................................................................................................ 5 A. Opinion and Judgment of the United States Military Tribunal II* ................................... 5 COUNT TWO.................................................................................................................... 5 COUNT ONE..................................................................................................................... 9 COUNT THREE .............................................................................................................. 18 SENTENCE ............................................................................................................................. 22 B. Concurring Opinion by Judge Michael A. Musmanno.................................................... 23 COUNT ONE................................................................................................................... 23 COUNT TWO.................................................................................................................. 23 COUNT THREE .............................................................................................................. 23 I. SLAVE LABOR ............................................................................................................... 24 (a) Methods of Recruitment ............................................................................................. 24 (b) Treatment of Workers................................................................................................. 29 II. PRISONERS OF WAR ................................................................................................... 34 III. PARTICIPATION OF MILCH IN THE SLAVE LABOR PROGRAM ...................... 35 (a) Central Planning Board............................................................................................... 36 (b) Jaegerstab.................................................................................................................... 43 (c) Generalluftzeugmeister............................................................................................... 46 IV. MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS......................................................................................... 52 (a) High-Altitude Tests..................................................................................................... 52 (b) Were the Experiments Painful to the Subjects ........................................................... 55 (c) Results Achieved ........................................................................................................ 56 (d) Freezing Experiments................................................................................................. 57 V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................... 61 (a) Responsibility of Milch as to Count One of Indictment............................................. 61 (b) Count Two .................................................................................................................. 66 (c) Count Three ................................................................................................................ 68 C. Concurring Opinion by Judge Fitzroy D. Phillips........................................................... 70 "ARTICLE II.................................................................................................................... 72 COUNT NO. I.................................................................................................................. 77 SLAVE LABOR .......................................................................................................... 77 JAEGERSTAB............................................................................................................. 79 GENERALLUFTZEUGMEISTER ............................................................................. 80 COUNT NO. 2 ................................................................................................................. 81 MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS ....................................................................................... 81 CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................. 83 VIII. PETITIONS..................................................................................................................... 85 A. Extract from Petition for Clemency to Military Governor of United States Zone of Occupation ........................................................................................................................... 85 B. Petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for Writ of Habeas Corpus ............. 88 Substantiation................................................................................................................... 89 IX. AFFIRMATION OF SENTENCE BY THE MILITARY GOVERNOR OF THE UNITED STATES ZONE OF OCCUPATION......................................................................................... 92 Order with Respect to Sentence ....................................................................................... 92 X. ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 20 OCTOBER 1947, DENYING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS............................................................................. 93 APPENDIX ...................................................................................................................... 94 List of Witnesses in Case 2 .................................................................................................. 94 List of Witnesses Cont'd....................................................................................................... 95 INDEX OF DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY................................................................ 95 TESTIMONIES.......................................................................................................... 102 VII.JUDGMENT A. Opinion and Judgment of the United States Military Tribunal II* The indictment in this case contains three counts, which may be summarized as follows: Count One : War crimes, involving murder, slave labor, deportation of civilian population for slave labor, cruel and inhuman treatment of foreign laborers, and the use of prisoners of war in war operations by force and compulsion. Count Two: War crimes, involving murder, subjecting involuntary victims to low- pressure and freezing experiments resulting in torture and death. Count Three: Crimes against humanity, involving murder and the same unlawful acts specified in counts one and two against German nationals and nationals of other countries. For reasons of its own, the Tribunal will first consider counts two and one, in that order, followed by consideration of count three. COUNT TWO More in detail, this count alleges that the defendant was a principal in, accessory to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting part in and was connected with, plans and enterprises involving medical experiments without the subjects' consent, in the course of which experiments, the defendant, with others, perpetrated murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, and other inhuman acts. The so-called medical experiments consisted of placing the subject in an airtight chamber in which the air pressure is mechanically reduced so that it is comparable with the pressure to which an aviator is subjected at high altitudes, and in experimenting upon the effect of extreme dry and wet cold upon the human body. For these experiments inmates of the concentration camp at Dachau were selected. These inmates presented a motley group of prisoners of war, dissenters from the philosophy of the National Socialist Party, Jews, both from Germany and the eastern countries, rebellious or indifferent factory workers, displaced civilians from eastern occupied countries, and an undefined group known as "asocial or undesirable persons." __________ * Concurring opinions were filed by Judge Muamanno, see pp. 797-859, and by Judge Phillips, see pp. 860-878. {773} In approaching a judicial solution of the questions involved in this phase of the case, it may be well to set down seriatim the controlling legal questions to be answered by an analysis of the proof. (1) Were low-pressure and freezing experiments carried on at Dachau? (2) Were they of a character to inflict torture and death on the subjects? (The answer to these two questions may be said to involve the establishment of the corpus delicti .) (3) Did the defendant personally participate in them? (4) Were they conducted under his direction or command? (5) Were they conducted with prior knowledge on his part that they might be excessive or inhuman? (6) Did he have the power of opportunity to prevent or stop them? (7) If so, did he fail to act, thereby becoming particeps criminis and accessory to them? The periods during which these experiments were conducted become extremely significant in determining the responsibility of the defendant. The evidence is uncontradicted that the low-pressure experiments were inaugurated in March 1942,
Recommended publications
  • Neue Adels-Bibliographie: Neuerscheinungen 1
    Bill: Neue Adels-Bibliographie: Neuerscheinungen 1. Quartal 2021 und Nachträge 2000-2020 (Supplement) Dr. phil. Claus Heinrich Bill, M.A., M.A., B.A.: NeueNeue Adels-Adels- BibliographieBibliographie Arbeitspapier der Neuerscheinungen des 1. Quartals (Jänner bis März) 2021 mitsamt Nachträgen für 2000 bis 2020 der Monographien, Sammelbände und Aufsätze zum Adel in den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Die Inhalte dieser Quartals-Liste werden bei ihrem Erscheinen zugleich in den Hauptband eingefügt. Zweck der vorliegenden Liste ist es, Forschenden ein aktuelles Monitoring über die Novitäten zu geben. Herausgegeben vom Institut Deutsche Adelsforschung Forstweg 14 in 24105 Kiel - Düsternbrook im Selbstverlag des Instituts Deutsche Adelsforschung in Sonderburg © April 2021 1 / 8 Bill: Neue Adels-Bibliographie: Neuerscheinungen 1. Quartal 2021 und Nachträge 2000-2020 (Supplement) Achnitz, Wolfgang (Hg.): Wappen als Zeichen. Mittelalterliche Heraldik aus kommunikations- und zeichentheoretischer Perspektive, Berlin 2006, 209 Seiten [Aufsatzband mit sieben Beiträgen, die naturgemäß auch den Adel tangieren]. Aichinger, Philipp: Mit Adelstitel in den Arrest? Was künftig passieren kann. Wird das Adelsaufhebungsgesetz weiter- hin nicht novelliert, darf man Verstöße entweder gar nicht oder nur noch sehr hart sanktionieren, in: Die Presse (Wien), Ausgabe vom 7. November 2019, Seite 4 [betrifft den Fall Karl Habsburg und dessen Vorgehen wider das Adelsaufhe- bungsgesetz von 1919]. Aichinger, Philipp: Wo die Prinzenrolle noch erlaubt ist, in: Die Presse (Wien), Ausgabe vom 27. Dezember 2019, Seite 4 [betrifft Grundbucheinträge mit ehemaligem Adelstitel in Österreich; ferner den Fall von Karl Habsburg und dessen Klage wider das Adelsaufhebungsgesetz 1919]. Andermann, Kurt: Die Vornehmen in der Gemeinde. Überlegungen zu dörflichen Oberschichten im deutschen Südwes- ten während des späten Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, in: Gustav Pfeifer / Kurt Andermann (Hg.): Soziale Mobili- tät in der Vormoderne.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of Armed Conflict
    Lesson 1 THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT Basic knowledge International Committee of the Red Cross Unit for Relations with Armed and Security Forces 19 Avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T +41 22 734 60 01 F +41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org Original: English – June 2002 INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT BASIC KNOWLEDGE LESSON 1 [ Slide 2] AIM [ Slide 3] The aim of this lesson is to introduce the topic to the class, covering the following main points: 1. Background: setting the scene. 2. The need for compliance. 3. How the law evolved and its main components. 4. When does the law apply? 5. The basic principles of the law. INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT 1. BACKGROUND: SETTING THE SCENE Today we begin a series of lectures on the law of armed conflict, which is also known as the law of war, international humanitarian law, or simply IHL. To begin, I’d like to take a guess at what you’re thinking right now. Some of you are probably thinking that this is an ideal opportunity to catch up on some well-earned rest. “Thank goodness I’m not on the assault course or on manoeuvres. This is absolutely marvellous. I can switch off and let this instructor ramble on for 45 minutes. I know all about the Geneva Conventions anyway – the law is part of my culture and our military traditions. I really don't need to listen to all this legal ‘mumbo jumbo’.” The more sceptical and cynical among you might well be thinking along the lines of a very famous orator of ancient Rome – Cicero.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Kammler, Hitler's Last Hope, in American Hands
    WORKING PAPER 91 Hans Kammler, Hitler’s Last Hope, in American Hands By Frank Döbert and Rainer Karlsch, August 2019 THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES Christian F. Ostermann and Charles Kraus, Series Editors This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources from all sides of the post-World War II superpower rivalry. Among the activities undertaken by the Project to promote this aim are the Wilson Center's Digital Archive; a periodic Bulletin and other publications to disseminate new findings, views, and activities pertaining to Cold War history; a fellowship program for historians to conduct archival research and study Cold War history in the United States; and international scholarly meetings, conferences, and seminars. The CWIHP Working Paper series provides a speedy publication outlet for researchers who have gained access to newly-available archives and sources related to Cold War history and would like to share their results and analysis with a broad audience of academics, journalists, policymakers, and students. CWIHP especially welcomes submissions which use archival sources from outside of the United States; offer novel interpretations of well-known episodes in Cold War history; explore understudied events, issues, and personalities important to the Cold War; or improve understanding of the Cold War’s legacies and political relevance in the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • 9900 $8900 $8900
    Sale 2015 A-R 1-800-786-6210 Prices good through July 31, 2015 $ 00 $ 00 99Black Each 89Green Each M-35 German Combat Helmet Made from heavy gauge mild steel, our "Stahlhelm" helmets feature all of the important details, including rolled shell edges, correct type separately applied air vents, and proper original markings. The genuine leather M-31 liners are attached with 3 split-rivets and include correct leather chinstraps and buckles. Painted in proper green or black color, each helmet comes with a FREE set of decals of your choice. Available in 2 liner & shell sizes that will fit most heads. Great for reenactors and collectors alike! 0102-009-358 Green - Size 57/58 0102-009-360 Green - Size 59/60 0102-009-758 Black - Size 57/58 0102-009-760 Black - Size 59/60 WWI German Stahlhelm and Cut-Out Helmet Our helmet maker is now producing these nice quality replicas of the World War I German Stahlhelm. These accurate reproductions feature rolled rims and the well-known vent lugs on each side, and are fitted with the correct style, 3-piece padded liners and 2-piece leather chinstrap of that period. Paint color is dark green and they are available in large size, which fits up to about size 60.The M-16 is the standard style while the M-18 features ear cut- outs and was also known as the “telephone operator” or “cavalry helmet” A 0102-010-260 M-18 "Cut-Out" B 0102-010-160 M-16 " "Stahlhelm" $ 00 89Each A B General Field Marshall Formal Batons - Museum Quality These exquisite pieces are museum grade copies of the formal baton, or Marschallstab, presented to Field Marshals Erwin Rommel and Erhard Milch upon promotion to Generalfeldmarschall.
    [Show full text]
  • German History Reflected
    The Detlev Rohwedder Building German history reflected GFE = 1/2 Formathöhe The Detlev Rohwedder Building German history reflected Contents 3 Introduction 44 Reunification and Change 46 The euphoria of unity 4 The Reich Aviation Ministry 48 A tainted place 50 The Treuhandanstalt 6 Inception 53 The architecture of reunification 10 The nerve centre of power 56 In conversation with 14 Courage to resist: the Rote Kapelle Hans-Michael Meyer-Sebastian 18 Architecture under the Nazis 58 The Federal Ministry of Finance 22 The House of Ministries 60 A living place today 24 The changing face of a colossus 64 Experiencing and creating history 28 The government clashes with the people 66 How do you feel about working in this building? 32 Socialist aspirations meet social reality 69 A stroll along Wilhelmstrasse 34 Isolation and separation 36 Escape from the state 38 New paths and a dead-end 72 Chronicle of the Detlev Rohwedder Building 40 Architecture after the war – 77 Further reading a building is transformed 79 Imprint 42 In conversation with Jürgen Dröse 2 Contents Introduction The Detlev Rohwedder Building, home to Germany’s the House of Ministries, foreshadowing the country- Federal Ministry of Finance since 1999, bears wide uprising on 17 June. Eight years later, the Berlin witness to the upheavals of recent German history Wall began to cast its shadow just a few steps away. like almost no other structure. After reunification, the Treuhandanstalt, the body Constructed as the Reich Aviation Ministry, the charged with the GDR’s financial liquidation, moved vast site was the nerve centre of power under into the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949
    THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 AUGUST 12 OF CONVENTIONS THE GENEVA THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 0173/002 05.2010 10,000 ICRC Mission The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an impartial, neutral and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide them with assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suffering by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863, the ICRC is at the origin of the Geneva Conventions and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. It directs and coordinates the international activities conducted by the Movement in armed conflicts and other situations of violence. THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949 1 Contents Preliminary remarks .......................................................................................................... 19 GENEVA CONVENTION FOR THE AMELIORATION OF THE CONDITION OF THE WOUNDED AND SICK IN ARMED FORCES IN THE FIELD OF 12 AUGUST 1949 CHAPTER I General Provisions ....................................................................................................... 35 Article 1 Respect for the Convention ..................................................................... 35 Article 2 Application of the Convention ................................................................ 35 Article 3 Conflicts not of an international
    [Show full text]
  • I.G. Farben's Petro-Chemical Plant and Concentration Camp at Auschwitz Robert Simon Yavner Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Summer 1984 I.G. Farben's Petro-Chemical Plant and Concentration Camp at Auschwitz Robert Simon Yavner Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Economic History Commons, and the European History Commons Recommended Citation Yavner, Robert S.. "I.G. Farben's Petro-Chemical Plant and Concentration Camp at Auschwitz" (1984). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/7cqx-5d23 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/27 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1.6. FARBEN'S PETRO-CHEMICAL PLANT AND CONCENTRATION CAMP AT AUSCHWITZ by Robert Simon Yavner B.A. May 1976, Gardner-Webb College A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 1984 Approved by: )arw±n Bostick (Director) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by Robert Simon Yavner 1984 All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT I.G. FARBEN’S PETRO-CHEMICAL PLANT AND CONCENTRATION CAMP AT AUSCHWITZ Robert Simon Yavner Old Dominion University, 1984 Director: Dr. Darwin Bostick This study examines the history of the petro­ chemical plant and concentration camp run by I.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Field-Marshal Albert Kesselring in Context
    Field-Marshal Albert Kesselring in Context Andrew Sangster Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy University of East Anglia History School August 2014 Word Count: 99,919 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or abstract must include full attribution. Abstract This thesis explores the life and context of Kesselring the last living German Field Marshal. It examines his background, military experience during the Great War, his involvement in the Freikorps, in order to understand what moulded his attitudes. Kesselring's role in the clandestine re-organisation of the German war machine is studied; his role in the development of the Blitzkrieg; the growth of the Luftwaffe is looked at along with his command of Air Fleets from Poland to Barbarossa. His appointment to Southern Command is explored indicating his limited authority. His command in North Africa and Italy is examined to ascertain whether he deserved the accolade of being one of the finest defence generals of the war; the thesis suggests that the Allies found this an expedient description of him which in turn masked their own inadequacies. During the final months on the Western Front, the thesis asks why he fought so ruthlessly to the bitter end. His imprisonment and trial are examined from the legal and historical/political point of view, and the contentions which arose regarding his early release.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America V. Erhard Milch
    War Crimes Trials Special List No. 38 Records of Case II United States of America v. Erhard Milch National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. 1975 Special List No. 38 Nuernberg War Crimes Trials Records of Case II United States of America v. Erhard Milch Compiled by John Mendelsohn National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1975 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data United States. National Archives and Records Service. Nuernberg war crimes trial records. (Special list - National Archives and Records Service; no. 38) Includes index. l. War crime trials--N emberg--Milch case,l946-l947. I. Mendelsohn, John, l928- II. Title. III. Series: United States. National Archives and Records Service. Special list; no.38. Law 34l.6'9 75-6l9033 Foreword The General Services Administration, through the National Archives and Records Service, is· responsible for administering the permanently valuable noncurrent records of the Federal Government. These archival holdings, now amounting to more than I million cubic feet, date from the <;lays of the First Continental Congress and consist of the basic records of the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of our Government. The presidential libraries of Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson contain the papers of those Presidents and of many of their - associates in office. These research resources document significant events in our Nation's history , but most of them are preserved because of their continuing practical use in the ordinary processes of government, for the protection of private rights, and for the research use of scholars and students.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011
    Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011 Overview: Protecting the Byzantine Empire and the Lieber Code The Red Cross Vulnerable in War used during the United States Civil War. and International International humanitarian law (IHL) is The development of modern Humanitarian Law a set of rules that seek for humanitarian international humanitarian law is The Red Cross and the Geneva reasons to limit the effects of armed credited to the efforts of 19th century Conventions were born when Henry conflict. IHL protects persons who are Swiss businessman Henry Dunant. In Dunant witnessed the devastating not or who are no longer participating in 1859, Dunant witnessed the aftermath consequences of war at a battlefield hostilities and it restricts the means and in Italy. In the aftermath of that battle, of a bloody battle between French methods of warfare. IHL is also known Dunant argued successfully for the and Austrian armies in Solferino, Italy. as the law of war and the law of armed creation of a civilian relief corps to The departing armies left a battlefield respond to human suffering during conflict. littered with wounded and dying men. conflict, and for rules to set limits on A major part of international Despite Dunant’s valiant efforts to how war is waged. humanitarian law is contained in the mobilize aid for the soldiers, thousands Inspired in part by her work in the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 that died. Civil War, Clara Barton would later have been adopted by all nations in found the American Red Cross and In “A Memory of Solferino,” his book also advocate for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians Against the Effects of Hostilities Under Customary International Law and Under Protocol I Waldemar A
    American University International Law Review Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 8 1986 Protection of Civilians Against the Effects of Hostilities Under Customary International Law and Under Protocol I Waldemar A. Solf Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Solf, Waldemar A. "Protection of Civilians Against the Effects of Hostilities Under Customary International Law and Under Protocol I." American University International Law Review 1, no. 1 (1986): 117-135. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS AGAINST THE EFFECTS OF HOSTILITIES UNDER CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND UNDER PROTOCOL I Waldemar A. Solf* INTRODUCTION Humanitarian law is the outgrowth of centuries of warfare from which the rules and customs governing the conduct of hostilities have developed. Its development was stimulated by military men who recog- nized that violence and destruction, which are superfluous to actual military necessity, are not only immoral and wasteful of scarce re- sources, but are also counter-productive to the attainment of the politi- cal objectives for which military force is used. The purpose of this presentation is to outline the historical develop- ment of restraints on the methods and means of warfare, their accept- ance as customary law binding on all states, and the relation of custom- ary law to the codifications of international law in the Hague Conventions of 1907,1 the Geneva Conventions of 1949,2 and the 1977 * Adjunct Professor of Law, Washington College of Law, The American University, Member, U.S.
    [Show full text]