Extended System Operations Studies for Automated Guideway Transit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extended System Operations Studies for Automated Guideway Transit i ' \ A-MA:-06-0C4S-8,7 12, ^rSC-UMlf,A-B1:-67‘ ' Extended' %eteni,;Cliereli5n Stydies'-for':; AiJ.to'M -B ' A/ '• ' 4 A 7V ' V f ;; .V :..L -. vAVi i.f. ’^' , 74v {' V (a'M'Trsnspprtaiion^Sy^-w.-rt .» » VI. I vw V»-.- C » • w . ;<?nMI *, /Geriferai Motors Oor po'*-3^»w ^ ''A ' , \(^jrv G Motors. Jschriica! Ceo'teM-' ; ’' 7 Warrer:, Michigan 43090- • ; :w^# - A - ,t ^ *' ' ' . A,'., Fehaiary 1982 ., • - • • -t t: \: ,,. Wsi HRPl , J/ ; F .l»- ; '’ ,1^ 'if''-' . ' ( B® ^ 4',-7 ' -A 7w=a '.v:;;.A, r''.' r t,; \ > vr; w' ' .' ^v ’ ’':''' * '-' ^ •AFjir'l'j,' '.' .;. v'?'*' '’fi''' ''f : - '-WV- ' ‘ . r ThiS'd^cument is available to the ipuWic ', ' through the l^'atiortal Technical' information , Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. j . ’ ' 'i^lP 'f ' I ' >> US' Depot imenf of Transporfolion .' Urban f.4ass Trcmsp'^rtatjon AcSttiinistroition ^Slfr • ' • ' Hi, • . .1 . ice of TechriQlocy De'veippn^ert>r' arp 'Depldyment ^ Office of! Nevv Svatems ahd vAutoma^ ~ A Vt''3shihcton -DC 20590 nils document is disseminated under the ft. sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. fnm P, .<<, - The contents of this report reflect the views L of General Ntotors Transportation Systems Center, which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. '.>?> Ykt ' (.'‘iW'i .'W fi . ‘.V 8 : /<<'. b Technical Report Documentation Page f\ 0 !• Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. i) OT- rsG UMTA-MA-06- 0048- 81- 12 PB 82-194119 4. Title and SwbtitI# 5. Report Dote /'i;7 February 1982 Extended System Operations Studies for 6. Performing Organization Code Automated Guideway Transit System^ DTS-723 S. Porforming Organization Report No. 7. Author's) J.D. Boldig, and J.T. Thompson DOT-TSC-UMTA-81-67 9. Performing Organization Nome ond Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) General Motors Corporation* MA- 06- 004 GM Transportation Systems Center 1 1 . Contract or Gront No. Warren, Michigan 48090 DOT-TSC-1783 13. Type of Report ond Period Covered Address 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome and Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation Sept. 1979-Sept. 1981 Urban Mass Transportation Administration 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Id. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20590 UTD-40 15. Supplementary Notes U.S. Department of Transportation Research & Special Programs Administration *Under contract to; Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 16. Abstract The objectives of the System Operations Studies (SOS) of the Automated Guideway Transit Technology (AGTT) program was to develop models for the analysis of system operations, to evaluate AGT system performance and cost, and to establish guidelines for the design and operation of AGT systems. This final report summarizes and documents the work accomplished by General Motors and the Transportation Systems Center in the fulfillment of the Extended System Operations Studies contract. The three main areas covered in this report are: 1) the development of a set of analysis procedures that are supported by the computer models developed during the SOS project; 2) the software changes made to the Discrete Event Simulation Model (DESM) to expand and improve its capability to model guideway transit systems; and 3) the A'aliUkLxou vl Liie ability of the DESM to accurately model vehicle merges an i o modeling custom designed dispatching algorithm. Also inc .u4'gAN®QJ®kT^'^^o is a description of three system level models and their p- »ssible applicatio i to the ahalysis of conventional transit. AUG LIBRARY 17. Key Word* Morgautowu PRT 18. Distribution Stotement System Operations Studies (SOS) Available to the Public through the AGT Systems Analysis Procedures National Technical Information Service, AGTT Conventional Transit Springfield, Virginia 22161. Models Failure Management System Level Models Software 19. Security Clossif. (of this report) 20. Security Clossif. (of this page) 21. No. of P oge* 22. Price 62 A04 Unclassified Unclassified , Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page outhorized ' ' . " »; V ,w^M iMi^*,4i>ii|W|f:t.' -»-;.*«*•'• ri] jti. T i /^C>' -j '» .;„ - ; .„ li'. •' :' " • f If ,vv (i w 1 ^^ . ^i‘ •* ..ji ,• . • -’ i, V A'i V«*rM I. \i'* :i \ l1 . A^'fv ^ 4» i ^.r< A*. — :t.-v' • .. , f, s^.'.i *' ' ;-»i»vk4 , f 'ST r' *'. .’ - ^,'. , .. X,,r;. , ..... -J . .«-- a..^ ,J' ^ J ,' 1?‘*' r N'i'- ' M•!•'' 1' "> •.%' Ttchnicol Report Documentotion Poge 1 . R«porf No. 2. Gov«rnm*n> Accet&ion No. 3. Pectp'enf t Cotolog No UMTA-MA-06-0048-81-12 4. Titl« ortd Subtifl* 5. Repo'f Oof* Extended System Operations Studies for Automated February 1982 Guideway Transit Systems 6- Pe^fo^ming Ofgonixo^'on Code DTS-723 8. Performing 0 r g on i i o» i ori Pepo^^ No 7 . Aut+\o'' t) J.D. Boldig and J.T. Thompson DOT-TSC-UMTA-81-67 9. Performing Orgonizofion Nome ond Address ^ 10 Work Unit No (TRAIS) GM Transportation Systems Center UM268/R2670 General Motors Corporation H. Con»foc» O' G'ont No. General Motors Technical Center DOT-TSC-1783 Warren MI 48090 13. Type of Report ond Period 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome ond Address Final Report Department of Transportation U.S. Sept. 1979 to Sept. 1981 Urban Mass Transportation Administration Office of Technoloqy Development and Deoloyment 14 Sponsoring Agency Code Office of New Systems and Automation Washington DC 20590 UTD-40 15 Soppiemenrory Notes jj.S. Department of Transportati on Research and Soecial Programs Administration ‘Under contract4. to;4. Transportation' Systems Center Cambridge MA 02142 16 Abst'oc* The accomplishments under the Extended System Operations Studies contract are summarized in this report. The three primary areas covered are; the development of a set of analysis procedures which are supported by the simulation models developed during the I AGTT-SOS project, the software changes made to the Discrete Event Simulation Model (DESM) to expand and improve its capability to model ACT systems and the validation of the ability of the DESM to accurately model vehicle merges and the dispatching algorithm used by the Morgantown PRT System. I I Also included in this report is a description of three system level models developed during the AGTT-SOS program and their possible application to the analysis of conventional transit. 17. K«y Wofds 16. Distribution Statement tothe public Software document is available System Level Models, THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL Modifications, Failure Management, information service, SPRINGFIELD, Analysis Procedure, Validation, VIRGINIA 22161 Conventional Transit 21» No. of P oget 22. Price 19. Security Clotiif. (of tKi» report) 20. spcurity Clossif. (of this pogpl 62 Unclassi fied Unci assi fied Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed poge outhorixed ' I * t • '»•< *1 -•p^ ' * .V >j :«—.-'»+ <'i> >v^i *'*> i, -'i S?»B* • ~ -ii !<'^V7 t,{, Un» A*j^ ' ^ - - - . -y .>iiijp;f w.ii 1^ » » fl*i'**< idj t (I'l r iC; ; Vj- PO ^ l| •- ^0n5*^ afh §', "’^ ’ Si *'' ‘ : r 4r'r{'v^.71 'h>‘r I - '•’iS nm 'M Q iW. <.t - --.i Tit j • ^,'n'?in^ : -l^^i m- •f^i ' .»,; .f-rtj,' -flf V .,*a : « t^of^b':;#;: an .,r 'vv^ 'It,-T1 - j #:-;> •' USB ^ 'VPj :<» .U. 1. I ^tk-T^ IfSt. 'if if '^V' ... ?lrt/ ..(ij:.int»»^ vi«i ?i#3 ‘,V!.“ ,t;'. "'i.j.-W^.lt^, ilWr, \ ':.^(5'S j-k i • PREFACE To examine specific Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) developments and concepts and to build a data base for future decision-making, the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) undertook a program of studies and technology investigations called the UMTA Automated Guideway Transit Tech- nology (AGTT) program. The objectives of one segment of the AGTT program, the System Operations Studies (SOS), was to develop models for the analysis of system operations, to evaluate AGT system performance and cost, and to establish guidelines for the design and operation of AGT system. This program resulted in a comprehensive set of AGT system planning and system development models. In order to maximize the benefits resulting from the availability of these models, the model research, development and analysis activity was continued by the issuance of Contract DOT-TSC-1783 in September 1979 for the Extended System Operations Studies (XSOS) to GM Transportation Systems Center. To achieve the objectives of the Extended System Operations Studies project, the model research and development activity was continued through the implementation of software improvements and design changes to the models. Additional model validation activities were accomplished and an analysis procedure which is supported by the SOS models was developed. FACTORS CONVERSION METRIC i V TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2.0 MODEL CAPABILITIES 2-1 2.1 Model Types 2-1 2.1.1 System Level Models 2-1 2.1.2 Subsystem Level Models 2-2 2.1.3 Analysis Support Models 2-2 2.2 Model Overview 2-2 2.2.1 Discrete Event Simulation Model (DESM) 2-2 2.2.2 System Availability Model (SAM) 2-5 2.2.3 System Cost Model (SCM) 2-8 3.0 SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS 3-1 3.1 Failure Management 3-1 3.1.1 Scheduled Service Vehicle Spacing Algorithms 3-1 3.1.2 Scheduled Service Active Fleet Size Management Modification 3_3 3.1.3 Enhanced Failure Management Modeling 3-6 3.2 DESM Model Validation 3-11 3.3 Timeout/Group Demand Responsive Service Validation
Recommended publications
  • Introduction of Electronic Commerce
    Orf 467 – Transportation Systems Analysis Fall 2018/19 Enhancing Mobility Through Technology in a Congested Urban Environment Evolution of Ground Transport Technology: From the Omnibus through Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) to autonomousTaxis (aTaxis) The Problem: Urban Congestion Snarls Mobility Also issues about accessibility and equality of access Orf 467 – Transportation Systems Analysis Fall 2018/19 Over the years technology has evolved… From: To: Omnibus on Blackfriar’s Bridge, 1798 Hummers ~2007 (Pre Crisis) To: Prius & Tesla 2017 (?????) To: GoogleCars ~ 2017+ ??? Orf 467 – Transportation Systems Analysis Fall 2018/19 Evolution of the OmniBus for intra-urban mass transportation Start: Geo Enhancement: London,1798 NYC, 1830 Technology Elements: • Capacity: ~10 Seated Passengers • Propulsion: Horses or Mules • Externalities: Disease and non-operating revenue from pollution • Suspension: Steel Sprung Wooden Wheel with solid axel • Way: “Flat” Pavement (stone, wood, compacted earth) • Headway & Lateral Control: Human Capacity Enhancement: Propulsion Enhancement: Support Enhancement: Double Decker, London Steam, London Iron (Steel) Rails Orf 467 – Transportation Systems Analysis Fall 2018/19 Growth of Horse-Drawn Street Railway Technology 1850: NYC 1860: London 1875: Minneapolis 1890: Broadway NYC 1908: Washington , GA Week 8 Orf 467 – Transportation Systems Analysis Fall 2018/19 Evolution of Horse-Drawn Street Railway Technology Today: DisneyWorld Orf 467 – Transportation Systems Analysis Fall 2018/19 Growth of Cable Street Railway Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation in Public Transportation
    W Co'" Sf*rts o* A DIRECTORY OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS Fiscal Year 1975 U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.80 Stock No. 050-014-00006-1 Introduction This annual publication contains descriptions of through contracts with private firms, or through tion Act of 1964, as amended. The principal current research, development and demonstration working agreements with other Federal depart- method of reporting is through annual publication (RD&D) projects sponsored and funded by the ments and agencies. UMTA generally initiates of the compilation of reports on the status of U.S. Department of Transportation's Urban Mass and plans these RD&D projects and performs individual projects. Transportation Administration (UMTA). analytical tasks as well. The volume dated June 30, 1972 constituted an These projects are conducted under the author- Research projects are intended to produce infor- historical record of all projects funded under the ity of Section 6(a) of the Urban Mass Transporta- mation about possible improvements in urban Act to that point as well as projects funded tion Act of 1964, as amended (78 Stat. 302, 49 mass transportation. The products of research earlier under authorization of the Housing Act of U.S.C. 1601 et. seq.). This statute authorizes the projects are reports or studies. 1961. This volume is available from the National Secretary of Transportation "to undertake re- Technical Information Service (NTIS), access num- Development projects involve fabrication, testing, search, development, and demonstration projects ber PB-2 13-228.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Personal Rapid Transit in Ithaca, New York: Final Report
    FEASIBILITY OF PERSONAL RAPID TRANSIT IN ITHACA, NEW YORK Final Report Prepared for THE NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Albany, NY Joseph D. Tario, P.E. Senior Project Manager and THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Albany, NY Gary Frederick, P.E. Office of Technical Services, Director Prepared by C&S ENGINEERS, INC. Syracuse, NY Aileen Maguire Meyer, P.E., AICP Principal Investigator and CONNECT ITHACA Ithaca, NY Robert Morache Principal Investigator Contract Nos. 11101 / C-08-25 September 2010 [blank] NOTICE This report was prepared by C&S Engineers, Inc. and Connect Ithaca in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority and the New York State Department of Transportation (hereafter the “Sponsors”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors and the State of New York make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. The Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no representation that the use of any product, apparatus, process, method, or other information will not infringe privately owned rights and will assume no liability for any loss, injury, or damage resulting from, or occurring in connection with, the use of information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Rapid Transit (Prt)
    ATRA 1989 PRT Report digital format PERSONAL RAPID TRANSIT (PRT) ANOTHER OPTION FOR URBAN TRANSIT? A Report by the Technical Committee on Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) of the Advanced Transit Association, Inc. 1200 18th Street NW, Suite 610 Washington, D.C. 20036 March 1989 ATRA 1989 PRT Report digital format PERSONAL RAPID TRANSIT (PRT) ANOTHER OPTION FOR URBAN TRANSIT? A Report by the Technical Comittee on Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) of the Advanced Transit Association, Inc. 1200 18th Street NW, Suite 610 Washington, D.C. 20036 March 1989 ATRA 1989 PRT Report digital format Officers of the Advanced Transit Association Edward S. Neumann, President George Raikalis, Vice President Jarold A. Kieffer, Treasurer Board Officers Thomas H. Floyd Jr., Chairman Byron Johnson, Chairman, 1986-1989 Jarold A. Kieffer, Secretary The Advanced Transit Association exists to focus attention on unmet urban transportation needs and the ways in which advanced transit concepts can help satisfy them. One of these unmet needs results from the gap between the poor quality of transit service in medium and low-density locations within urban areas and the availability of transit technology that can furnish high quality service at affordable costs. ATRA’s objectives, with particular respect to this report, are to: § Focus public attention on the medium and low density transit problem and the ways in which advanced transit concepts can help solve it; § Seek wider agreement on the main features that advanced transit should possess to cope with this problem, including
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Personal Rapid Transit
    October 30, 2009 Evolution of Personal Rapid Transit J. Edward Anderson, Ph.D., P. E. PRT International, LLC Abstract The paper reviews the evolution of the PRT concept from its modern beginning in 1953. The early inventors, the projects, and the response of government are discussed. PRT ac- tivity diminished to almost nothing by 1980, but then revived strongly as a result of activ- ity by the Northeastern Illinois Regional Transportation Authority. Their interest ignited enthusiastic activity on a growing front to the point that today one can truly say that the concept is coming of age. Contents Page Introduction 2 Early Beginnings in the United States 4 The Urban Mass Transportation Administration 8 Activities in Other Countries 10 The Aerospace Corporation 14 U. S. Government Involvement 16 Page from Congressional Record 17 Morgantown 19 Transpo 72 19 1974-1981 21 1981-1990 22 The PRT Program of the Northeastern Illinois Regional 22 Transportation Authority The Future – an RTA Publication 24 An Editorial from the Chicago Tribune 25 Post RTA 25 Today 27 What Have We Learned? 27 Acknowledgements 29 Evolution of this Paper 30 References 31 1 October 30, 2009 Introduction The evolution of Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) can be traced back to at least 1953. Some of the ideas embodied in PRT go back even to the last century, but were premature, briefly flowered and died. Since 1953 the evolution has been continuous, though fluctuating − continuous per- haps mainly because the concept of automatic control, essential to PRT, had been firmly estab- lished by the early 1950’s; and fluctuating for reasons that had little or nothing to do with the technical feasibility of the idea or its potential value to urban society.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure for the Analysis of Representative AGT Deployments
    . HE 10 Extended System Operations ; 1 8.5 5 . A3 7 no Studies for Automated DOT- ransit ISC- Guideway T Systems UMTA- 81-55 Procedure for the Analysis of Representative AGT Deployments R. A. tee GM Transportation Systems Division General Motors Technical Center Warren Ml 48090 DEPARTMENT OF TRATTSFOHTATK>H JUL 81982 LIBRARY FOB 10A BRANCH December 1981 Final Report This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Administration Office of Technology Development and Deployment Office of New Systems and Automation Washington DC 20590 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manu- facturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. " /&ST .A 37 Technical Report Documentation Page syvO • 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 7SC- UMTA-MA-06-0048-81 -10 77f 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date EXTENDED SYSTEM OPERATIONS STUDIES FOR AUTOMATED December 1981 GUIDEWAY TRANSIT SYSTEMS - Procedure for the Analysis 6. Performing Organization Code DTS-723 of Representative AGT Deployments 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) R.A. Lee DOT-TSC-UMTA-81 -55 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (T RAIS) GM Transportation Systems Division* R2670/UM268 General Motors Corporation 11. Contract or Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Guideway Transit: an Assessment of PRT and Other New Systems
    Automated Guideway Transit: An Assessment of PRT and Other New Systems June 1975 NTIS order #PB-244854 UNITED STATES CONGRESS Office of Technology Assessment AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT AN ASSESSMENT OF PRT AND OTHER NEW SYSTEMS INCLUDING SUPPORTING PANEL REPORTS PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE w JUNE 1975 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE S4+70 o WASHINGTON : 1975 For sale by the Superintendent of DOCIUIN@S, U.S. Government Printing Oflice Washington, D.C. 20402- Prtce $3.65 Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment Washington, D.C. 20510 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT BOARD OLIN E. TEAGUE, Texas, Chairman CLIFFORD P. CASE, New Jersey, Vice Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts MORRIS K. UDALL, Arizona ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina GEORGE E. BROWN, Jr, California HUBERT H. HUMPHREY, Minnesota CHARLES A. MOSHER, Ohio RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania MARVIN L. ESCH, Michigan TED STEVENS, Alaska MARJORIE S. HOLT, Maryland EMILIO Q. DADDARIO EMilio Q. DADDAO, Director DANIEL V. DESiMONE, Deputy Direclor URBAN MasS TRANSIT ADVISORY PANEL WALTER J. BiERWAGEN, Amalgamated Transit Union Dr DORN MC GRATH, George Washington Univer- ROBERT A. Buaco, Public Policy Research Associa- Sity tion Dr. BERNARD M. OLWER, Hewlett-Packard Corp. JEANNE J. Fox, Joint Center for Political Studies SIMON REICH, Gibbs and Hill DR. LAWRENCE A. (Goldmuntz Economics and PROF. THOMAS C. SUTHERLAND, Jr., Princeton Science Planning University. GEORGE KRAMBLES , Chicago Transit Authority FREDERICK P. SALVUCCI, Massachusetts DOT DR. STEWART F. TAYLOR, Sanders and Thomas, Inc. OTA T RANSPORTATION A SSESSMENT S TAFF M EMBERS MARY E. AMES Dn. GRETCHEN S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case for Mobility As a Service (Maas)
    WORKING PAPER ITLS-WP-18-04 Emerging transport technologies and the modal efficiency framework: A case for mobility as a service (MaaS) By Yale Z Wong, David A Hensher and Corinne Mulley Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS), The University of Sydney Business School February 2018 ISSN 1832-570X INSTITUTE of TRANSPORT and LOGISTICS STUDIES The Australian Key Centre in Transport and Logistics Management The University of Sydney Established under the Australian Research Council’s Key Centre Program. NUMBER: Working Paper ITLS-WP-18-04 TITLE: Emerging transport technologies and the modal efficiency framework: A case for mobility as a service (MaaS) ABSTRACT: The land passenger transport sector lies on the cusp of a major transformation, guided by collaborative consumption, next generation vehicles, demographic change and digital technologies. Whilst there is widespread enthusiasm across the community for this nexus of disruptors, the wholescale implications on road capacity, traffic congestion, land use and the urban form remains unclear, and by extension, whether this emerging transport paradigm will bring a net benefit to the transport system and our communities. Some issues include the proliferation of point-to-point transportation, a continuation of universal vehicle ownership, and the demise of fixed route public transport—all envisaged by various industry leaders in technology and transportation. In this paper, we develop the modal efficiency framework, with axes representing spatial and temporal efficiency to illustrate why some of these developments may be geometrically incompatible with dense urban environments. We then investigate three potential scenarios likely to emerge and explain why they may be problematic with reference to this framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Guideway Transit: an Assessment of PRT and Other New Systems
    Automated Guideway Transit: An Assessment of PRT and Other New Systems June 1975 NTIS order #PB-244854 UNITED STATES CONGRESS Office of Technology Assessment AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT AN ASSESSMENT OF PRT AND OTHER NEW SYSTEMS INCLUDING SUPPORTING PANEL REPORTS PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE w JUNE 1975 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE S4+70 o WASHINGTON : 1975 For sale by the Superintendent of DOCIUIN@S, U.S. Government Printing Oflice Washington, D.C. 20402- Prtce $3.65 Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment Washington, D.C. 20510 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT BOARD OLIN E. TEAGUE, Texas, Chairman CLIFFORD P. CASE, New Jersey, Vice Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts MORRIS K. UDALL, Arizona ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina GEORGE E. BROWN, Jr, California HUBERT H. HUMPHREY, Minnesota CHARLES A. MOSHER, Ohio RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania MARVIN L. ESCH, Michigan TED STEVENS, Alaska MARJORIE S. HOLT, Maryland EMILIO Q. DADDARIO EMilio Q. DADDAO, Director DANIEL V. DESiMONE, Deputy Direclor URBAN MasS TRANSIT ADVISORY PANEL WALTER J. BiERWAGEN, Amalgamated Transit Union Dr DORN MC GRATH, George Washington Univer- ROBERT A. Buaco, Public Policy Research Associa- Sity tion Dr. BERNARD M. OLWER, Hewlett-Packard Corp. JEANNE J. Fox, Joint Center for Political Studies SIMON REICH, Gibbs and Hill DR. LAWRENCE A. (Goldmuntz Economics and PROF. THOMAS C. SUTHERLAND, Jr., Princeton Science Planning University. GEORGE KRAMBLES , Chicago Transit Authority FREDERICK P. SALVUCCI, Massachusetts DOT DR. STEWART F. TAYLOR, Sanders and Thomas, Inc. OTA T RANSPORTATION A SSESSMENT S TAFF M EMBERS MARY E. AMES Dn. GRETCHEN S.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation and Public Policy: the Case of Personal Rapid Transit", Based on Research, Carried on As Part of the Doctoral Program at UCLA from 1973-1977
    PREFACE (Including License to Download and Restrictions on Distribution) Prepared June, 2008, by the Author, Catherine G. Burke. In 1979 Lexington Books (belonging to D. C. Heath and Company) published the book "Innovation and Public Policy: The Case of Personal Rapid Transit", based on research, carried on as part of the doctoral program at UCLA from 1973-1977. I had become acquainted with the research on PRT at The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, California, and wondered why such a seemingly attractive system was not being adopted. I examined other research efforts in Japan, England, France and Germany and discovered their research began far more successfully, but in non-transportation agencies. As the projects appeared ready for implementation, the various Ministries and agencies controlling public transport took over the research and there they died. In the U.S., the only potential funding came from the US Department of Transportation or Transit Authorities, so Aerospace was also forced to abandon its highly promising project. At the time of publication, Lexington Books/D. C. Heath was the copyright holder. Aerospace Corporation, MITI in Japan, Cabinentaxi in Germany, and MATRA in France gave me permission to use their photos and maps which were also part of the copyright. Several years later when the book went out of print, D. C. Heath assigned the copyright to me. At the time the book was published I waived my royalty rights to keep the price of the book at a minimum so that even impecunious students could afford it. I personally bought the remaining copies of the book which were given to interested parties and to College and University Libraries at a price that simply covered my costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Transit Networks (ATN): a Review of the State of the Industry and Prospects for the Future, MTI Report 12-31
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 9-1-2015 Automated Transit Networks (ATN): A Review of the State of the Industry and Prospects for the Future, MTI Report 12-31 Burford Furman San Jose State University, [email protected] Sam Ellis Lawrence Fabian Peter Muller Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Burford Furman, Sam Ellis, Lawrence Fabian, and Peter Muller. "Automated Transit Networks (ATN): A Review of the State of the Industry and Prospects for the Future, MTI Report 12-31" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2015). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Automated Networks Transit (ATN) Transportation and California Automated Transit Networks Department of Transportation (ATN): A Review of the State of the Industry and Prospects for the Future MTI ReportMTI 12-31 MTI Report 12-31 September 2014 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies was established by Congress in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). The Institute’s Board of Trustees revised the name to Mineta
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Transit Networks (Atn): a Review of the State of the Industry and Prospects for the Future
    MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Automated Networks Transit (ATN) Transportation and California Automated Transit Networks Department of Transportation (ATN): A Review of the State of the Industry and Prospects for the Future MTI ReportMTI 12-31 MTI Report 12-31 September 2014 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies was established by Congress in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). The Institute’s Board of Trustees revised the name to Mineta MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Transportation Institute (MTI) in 1996. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Congress through the Founder, Honorable Norman Thomas Barron (TE 2015) Ed Hamberger (Ex-Officio) Michael Townes* (TE 2014) United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the California Legislature Mineta (Ex-Officio) Executive Vice President President/CEO Senior Vice President through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Secretary (ret.), US Department of Strategic Initiatives Association of American Railroads National Transit Services Leader Transportation Parsons Group CDM Smith Vice Chair Steve Heminger (TE 2015) The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Hill & Knowlton, Inc. Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Executive Director Bud Wright (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Metropolitan Transportation Executive Director transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs Honorary Chair, Honorable Bill Amtrak Commission American Association of State and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home.
    [Show full text]