DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species Summary Gastrolobium spinosum LC Taxonomic Authority: Benth. Global Assessment Regional Assessment Region: Global Endemic to region Synonyms Common Names PRICKLY POISON English (Primary) Upper Level Taxonomy Kingdom: PLANTAE Phylum: TRACHEOPHYTA Class: MAGNOLIOPSIDA Order: FABALES Family: LEGUMINOSAE Lower Level Taxonomy Rank: Infra- rank name: Plant Hybrid Subpopulation: Authority: This is an extremely variable species, in both leaf shape and size. It resembles Gastrolobium aculeatum, G. euryphyllum, G. triangulare, G. trilobum and G. wonganensis. There are several known varieties. General Information Distribution Gastrolobium spinosum is endemic to Australia, distributed in the state of Western Australia. Range Size Elevation Biogeographic Realm Area of Occupancy: Upper limit: 520 Afrotropical Extent of Occurrence: Lower limit: Antarctic Map Status: Depth Australasian Upper limit: Neotropical Lower limit: Oceanian Depth Zones Palearctic Shallow photic Bathyl Hadal Indomalayan Photic Abyssal Nearctic Population Total population size is not known but it was recently collected in 2008. Total Population Size Minimum Population Size: Maximum Population Size: Habitat and Ecology This prickly bushy to erect shrub grows in a wide range of habitats, from sand plains to mountain escarpment, on sandy soils to clay-loam soils in forest, woodland, malee and heathland. It is pollinated by insects and it is higly toxic to stock (Chandler et al. 2002). Mostly found in small colonies a little inland on heavier soils particularly with a rocky substrate, but usually within the agricultural zone (Archer 2009). System Movement pattern Crop Wild Relative Terrestrial Freshwater Nomadic Congregatory/Dispersive Is the species a wild relative of a crop? Marine Migratory Altitudinally migrant Growth From Definition Shrub - large Perennial shrub (>1m), also termed a Phanerophyte (>1m) Threats There are no major threats known to this species. This genus is highly toxic to stock which led to an eradication program in the wheat-belt region in Western Australia. Also in agricultural areas, fertilisers and herbicides greatly affected the species of this genus, by changing the nutrients in the soils and impeeding seed germination respectively. Most of the natural habitat of this region has been cleared for agriculture and farmland. Past Present Future 1 Habitat Loss/Degradation (human induced) 1.1 Agriculture 1.1.1 Crops 1.1.4 Livestock 5 Persecution 5.1 Pest control 6 Pollution (affecting habitat and/or species) 6.2 Land pollution 6.2.1 Agriculture Conservation Measures Across its range, several populations of this species occur within protected areas. Most notably known from Stirling Range National Park, Woondowing Nature Reserve and Avon Valley National Park. Several areas where this species occurs are undergoing restoration plans, Peniup Restoration Plan (Jonson 2009) and Moresby Range Drummondita Recovery Plan (Stack et al. 2004). This species is not listed as Threatened in the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The seeds for this species have been collected as part of the Millennium Seed Bank project. Seeds are located at: Wakehurst Place, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (UK) and Kings Park & Botanic Garden, Perth (Australia). In Place Needed 1 Policy-based actions 1.1 Management plans 1.1.1 Development 1.1.2 Implementation 4 Habitat and site-based actions 4.4 Protected areas 5 Species-based actions 5.7 Ex situ conservation actions 5.7.2 Genome resource bank Countries of Occurrence PRESENCE ORIGIN Year Breeding Non- Passage Possibly ExtinctPresence Native Introduced Re- Vagrant Origin Round Season breeding migrant extinct uncertain Introduced uncertain only season only Australia Western Australia General Habitats Score Description Major Importance 1 Forest 1UnsetSuitable 1.4 Forest - Temperate1Unset Suitable 2 Savanna 1UnsetSuitable 2.1 Savanna - Dry1Unset Suitable 3 Shrubland 1UnsetSuitable 3.8 Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation1Unset Suitable Species Utilisation Species is not utilised at all Trend in the level of wild offtake/harvest in relation to total wild population numbers over the last five years: Trend in the amount of offtake/harvest produced through domestication/cultivation over the last five years: CITES status: Not listed IUCN Red Listing Red List Assessment:(using 2001 IUCN system) Least Concern (LC) Red List Criteria: Date Last Seen (only for EX, EW or Possibly EX species): Is the species Possibly Extinct? Possibly Extinct Candidate? Rationale for the Red List Assessment G. spinosum is listed as Least Concern in view its wide distribution in south-west Western Australia. Also for the fact that it is known to occur within protected areas and that its seeds have been banked as an ex situ conservatin measure. Furthermore, there are no major threats known to this species, however, this genus is highly toxic to stock and in the past it was targetted in an eradication plan. Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: Genuine Change Nongenuine Change No Change Genuine (recent) New information Taxonomy Same category Genuine (since first assessment) Knowledge of Criteria Criteria Revisio and criteria Incorrect data used Other Same category but previously change in criteria Current Population Trend: Stable Date of Assessment: 29/07/2010 Name(s) of the Assessor(s): Malcolm, P. Evaluator(s): Notes: % population decline in the past: Time period over which the past decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): % population decline in the future: Time period over which the future decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): Number of Locations: Severely Fragmented: Number of Mature Individuals: Bibliography Archer, W., 2009, Prickly poison - Gastrolobium spinosum, Esperance wildflowers29 July 2010, , , Chandler, G.R., Crisp, M.D., Cayzer, L.W. Bayer, R.J., 2002, Monograph of Gastrolobium (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae)., Australian Systematic Botany5, 619-739, , Commonwealth of Australia, 1999, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)10 June 2010, , , Corrick, G.C. and Fuhrer, B.A., 1996, Wildflowers of Southern Western Australia, A.S. George, , The Five Mile Press Pty Ltd, Victoria Grieve, B.J., 1998, How to know Western Australian Wildflowers, , University of Western Australian Press, Nedlands Jonson, J., 2009, Peniup Restoration Plan, Greening Australia, , , Nevill, S. and McQuoid, N., 2006, Guide to the wildflowers of Western Australia, , Simon Nevill Publications, Fremantle Stack, G., Chant, A., English, V., 2004, Moresby Range Drummondita (Drummondita ericoides). Interim Recovery Plan., , Department of Conservation and Land Management., Wanneroo Wheeler, J., Marchant, N. and Lewington, M., 2002, Flora of the south west: Bunbury - Augusta - Denmark., , ABRS and W.A. Herbarium in association with UWA Press, Canberra.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Australian Bee Genus Trichocolletes Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Paracolletini)
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Batley, Michael, and Terry F. Houston, 2012. Revision of the Australian bee genus Trichocolletes Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Paracolletini). Records of the Australian Museum 64(1): 1–50. [Published 23 May 2012]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.64.2012.1589 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia © The Authors, 2012. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2012 Records of the Australian Museum (2012) Vol. 64: 1–50. ISSN 0067-1975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.64.2012.1589 Revision of the Australian Bee Genus Trichocolletes Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Paracolletini) Michael Batley1* and terry F. houston2 1 Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] 2 Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool D.C. WA 6986, Australia [email protected] aBstract. The endemic Australian bee genus Trichocolletes is revised. Forty species are recognised, including twenty-three new species: Trichocolletes aeratus, T. albigenae, T. avialis, T. brachytomus, T. brunilabrum, T. capillosus, T. centralis, T. dundasensis, T. fuscus, T. gelasinus, T. grandis, T. lacaris, T. leucogenys, T. luteorufus, T. macrognathus, T. micans, T. nitens, T. orientalis, T. platyprosopis, T. serotinus, T. simus, T. soror and T. tuberatus. Four new synonymies are proposed: Paracolletes marginatus lucidus Cockerell, 1929 = T. chrysostomus (Cockerell, 1929); T. daviesiae Rayment, 1931 = T. venustus (Smith, 1862); T. marginatulus Michener, 1965 = T. sericeus (Smith, 1862); T. nigroclypeatus Rayment, 1929 = T.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Secondary Metabolites in Legumes (Fabaceae)
    SAJB-00956; No of Pages 12 South African Journal of Botany xxx (2013) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Evolution of secondary metabolites in legumes (Fabaceae) M. Wink ⁎ Heidelberg University, Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, INF 364, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany article info abstract Available online xxxx Legumes produce a high diversity of secondary metabolites which serve as defence compounds against herbi- vores and microbes, but also as signal compounds to attract pollinating and fruit-dispersing animals. As Edited by B-E Van Wyk nitrogen-fixing organisms, legumes produce more nitrogen containing secondary metabolites than other plant families. Compounds with nitrogen include alkaloids and amines (quinolizidine, pyrrolizidine, indolizidine, piper- Keywords: idine, pyridine, pyrrolidine, simple indole, Erythrina, simple isoquinoline, and imidazole alkaloids; polyamines, Horizontal gene transfer phenylethylamine, tyramine, and tryptamine derivatives), non-protein amino acids (NPAA), cyanogenic gluco- Evolution of secondary metabolisms Molecular phylogeny sides, and peptides (lectins, trypsin inhibitors, antimicrobial peptides, cyclotides). Secondary metabolites without fl fl Chemotaxonomy nitrogen are phenolics (phenylpropanoids, avonoids, iso avones, catechins, anthocyanins, tannins, lignans, cou- Function of secondary metabolites marins and furanocoumarins), polyketides (anthraquinones), and terpenoids (especially
    [Show full text]
  • The New Genus Auritella from Africa and Australia (Inocybaceae, Agaricales): Molecular Systematics, Taxonomy and Historical Biogeography
    Mycol Progress (2006) 5: 2–17 DOI 10.1007/s11557-005-0001-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE P. Brandon Matheny . Neale L. Bougher The new genus Auritella from Africa and Australia (Inocybaceae, Agaricales): molecular systematics, taxonomy and historical biogeography Received: 10 January 2005 / Revised: 21 September 2005 / Accepted: 11 October 2005 / Published online: 14 February 2006 # German Mycological Society and Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract Recent phylogenetic evidence strongly supports a Introduction monophyletic group of Afro-Australian mushroom species with phenotypic affinities to the genus Inocybe (Agaricales, Progress towards generating a phylogenetic-based classi- Basidiomycota). In this study, this clade is proposed as the fication of Inocybe and allies in the Agaricales or euagarics new genus Auritella. Seven species are fully documented clade has been accelerated recently by several molecular with taxonomic descriptions and illustrations, four of which systematic studies of the group (Kropp and Matheny 2004; are described as new, including one sequestrate or truffle-like Matheny et al. 2002; Matheny 2005; Matheny and species. A key to genera and major clades of the Inocybaceae Ammirati 2003; Matheny and Watling 2004). In particular, and a key to species of Auritella are provided. A maximum Matheny (2005) demonstrated the monophyly of five likelihood tree using rpb2 and nLSU-rDNA nucleotide major lineages within Inocybe and provided strong sequences depicts the phylogenetic relationships of five of evidence for a sister relationship between the Inocybaceae, the seven species of the genus, of which the Australian taxa a monophyletic family of ectomycorrhizal species, and the form a monophyletic group. An ancient split between Crepidotaceae, a family of saprophytic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Filters to Seedling Establishment for Restoration in a Mediterranean Climate
    Ecological filters to seedling establishment for restoration in a Mediterranean climate Lauren M. Hallett B.Sc. (Biology), Yale University, USA This thesis is presented for the degree of Masters of Science by Research in Natural Resources The University of Western Australia School of Plant Biology 2010 ii Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research conducted during my period of enrollment at the University of Western Australia. It has not previously been submitted for a degree at this or any other university. As stated in the Acknowledgements, my ideas and research approach have been shaped through interactions with many people. However, any work done jointly with supervisors or co- workers is stated below: Chapter Two: This paper is in preparation for Restoration Ecology by myself with co- authors Justin Jonson, Rachel Standish and Richard Hobbs. It makes use of a restoration site designed and managed by Justin Jonson, and I developed the experimental design and collected the data jointly with him. I developed the questions, conducted the analysis and wrote the manuscript with the guidance of Rachel Standish and Richard Hobbs. Chapter Three: This paper is in preparation for Plant Ecology by myself with co-authors Rachel Standish and Richard Hobbs. I developed the questions, designed the experiment and analyzed the data with their guidance. Lauren M. Hallett iii iv Abstract Ecological filters are abiotic factors, such as limited rainfall, and biotic factors, such as competition, that over time reduce the number of species that can survive at a given site. The filters acting on a restoration site generally differ from those acting on a naturally regenerating community.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Flora and Fauna Habitat Survey of Proposed Development
    Targeted Flora and Fauna Habitat Survey of Proposed Development in Swan View Prepared for Statewest Planning Ref: T18022 Terratree Pty Ltd ABN 48 159 6065 005 Unit 3, No. 42 Victoria Street, Midland WA 6056 Telephone: (08) 9250 1163 Mobile: 0400 003 688 Email: [email protected] www.terratree.com.au Document Control Revision Details Date Author Reviewer Rev 0 Internal Review 10/01/2019 G. Maslen J. Grehan Rev A Draft for Submission to Client for Review 23/01/2019 G. Maslen J. Grehan Rev B Final Submission to Client 07/02/2019 G. Maslen S. O’Hara Joseph Grehan Director and Principal Ecologist Targeted Flora and Fauna Survey of Proposed Development in Swan View for Statewest Planning i DISCLAIMER This document is prepared in accordance with and subject to an agreement between Terratree Pty Ltd (“Terratree”) and the client for whom it has been prepared (“Statewest Planning”) and is restricted to those issues that have been raised by the client in its engagement of Terratree and prepared using the standard of skill and care ordinarily exercised by Environmental Scientists in the preparation of such documents. Any organisation or person that relies on or uses this document for purposes or reasons other than those agreed by Terratree and the client without first obtaining the prior written consent of Terratree, does so entirely at their own risk and Terratree denies all liability in tort, contract or otherwise for any loss, damage or injury of any kind whatsoever (whether in negligence or otherwise) that may be suffered as a consequence of relying on this document for any purpose other than that agreed with the client.
    [Show full text]
  • First Reports and Generic Descriptions of the Achlorophyllous Holoparasites Apodanthaceae (Cucurbitales) of Colombia
    González y Pabón-Mora Actual Biol Volumen 36 / Número 101, 2014 First reports and generic descriptions of the achlorophyllous holoparasites Apodanthaceae (Cucurbitales) of Colombia Primeros registros y descripciones genéricas de la familia de holoparásitos aclorófilos Apodanthaceae (Cucurbitales) de Colombia Favio González1, 3, Natalia Pabón-Mora2, 4 Abstract The Apodanthaceae (Cucurbitales) are one of the 12 parasitic clades of flowering plants and the only holoparasitic family with a vegetative phase entirely endophytic, growing primarily on Fabaceae and Salicaceae stems. The two genera of the family, Apodanthes and Pilostyles, are broadly distributed in Colombia, although they remain extremely under-collected and poorly known. Based on field and herbarium work, and a review of the literature, we provide detailed generic-level descriptions of the family. We also update the records of the family in Colombia and discuss the homology and taxonomic implications of floral characters such as perianth scales, pollen sacs, and the central column. Finally, we provide photographic records of Colombian Apodanthaceae, and some guidelines for properly collecting these plants. Key words: Apodanthaceae, Apodanthes, Cucurbitales, Colombian flora, parasitic flowering plants,Pilostyles Resumen Apodanthaceae (Cucurbitales) es uno de los doce clados de angiospermas parasíticas, y la única familia de especies holoparasíticas con la fase vegetativa completamente endofítica en tallos principalmente de especies de Fabaceae y Salicaceae. Los dos géneros de la familia, Apodanthes y Pilostyles están ampliamente distribuidos en Colombia, aunque han sido muy poco recolectados y permanecen poco conocidos. Con base en trabajo de campo y de herbario, y una extensa revisión bibliográfica, se describen en detalle los caracteres genéricos de la familia.
    [Show full text]
  • Wojciechowski Quark
    Wojciechowski, M.F. (2003). Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): an early 21st century perspective In: B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau (editors). Advances in Legume Systematics, part 10, Higher Level Systematics, pp. 5–35. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. RECONSTRUCTING THE PHYLOGENY OF LEGUMES (LEGUMINOSAE): AN EARLY 21ST CENTURY PERSPECTIVE MARTIN F. WOJCIECHOWSKI Department of Plant Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287 USA Abstract Elucidating the phylogenetic relationships of the legumes is essential for understanding the evolutionary history of events that underlie the origin and diversification of this family of ecologically and economically important flowering plants. In the ten years since the Third International Legume Conference (1992), the study of legume phylogeny using molecular data has advanced from a few tentative inferences based on relatively few, small datasets into an era of large, increasingly multiple gene analyses that provide greater resolution and confidence, as well as a few surprises. Reconstructing the phylogeny of the Leguminosae and its close relatives will further advance our knowledge of legume biology and facilitate comparative studies of plant structure and development, plant-animal interactions, plant-microbial symbiosis, and genome structure and dynamics. Phylogenetic relationships of Leguminosae — what has been accomplished since ILC-3? The Leguminosae (Fabaceae), with approximately 720 genera and more than 18,000 species worldwide (Lewis et al., in press) is the third largest family of flowering plants (Mabberley, 1997). Although greater in terms of the diversity of forms and number of habitats in which they reside, the family is second only perhaps to Poaceae (the grasses) in its agricultural and economic importance, and includes species used for foods, oils, fibre, fuel, timber, medicinals, numerous chemicals, cultivated horticultural varieties, and soil enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastrolobium Spp. Poisoning in Sheep—A Case Report
    Gastrolobium spp. Poisoning in Sheep—A Case Report Roy Butler1, Samantha Tai2, Jeremy G. Allen2, Daniel Cook3, and Stephen T. Lee3* 1Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, Merredin, Western Australia, 6415, Australia 2 Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, South Perth, Western Australia, 6151, Australia 3 USDA-ARS Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory, Logan, Utah, USA *Corresponding author: Stephen T. Lee, [email protected] Abstract This report describes the history and investigation of a suspected plant poisoning event in Western Australia where 15 sheep died. One of the poisoned sheep was necropsied, and gross and microscopic pathology of the poisoned sheep is described. Monofluoroacetate was detected in rumen contents from the necropsied sheep. The case history, pathological changes, and detection of monofluoroacetate in the rumen contents support a diagnosis of monofluoroacetate intoxication. A review of the literature suggests this is the first example of detection of monofluoroacetate in the rumen contents of an animal poisoned by a plant containing monofluoroacetate. Keywords: Gastrolobium spp., monofluoroacetate, poisoning, sheep Introduction Many plants found primarily in the southern highest in reproductive tissues such as pods, flowers, continents of Africa, Australia, and South America, and young leaves and much lower in mature leaves belonging to the Fabaceae, Rubiaceae, and wood (Aplin 1971, Hall 1972, Twigg et al. Bignoniaceae, Malpighiaceae, and Dichapetalaceae 1996b, Twigg et al. 1999). There are varying degrees families, contain monofluoroacetate and adversely of evidence for toxicity in 39 species of Gastrolobium affect livestock production on these continents (Lee (Bennetts 1935, Gardner and Bennetts 1956, Gardner et al. 2014). Australian species of Gastrolobium and 1964, Aplin 1971, Twigg et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastrolobium Appressum
    Interim Recovery Plan No. 356 Scale-leaf Poison Gastrolobium appressum Interim Recovery Plan 2015–2020 Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia November 2015 Interim Recovery Plan for Gastrolobium appressum List of Acronyms The following acronyms are used in this plan: BGPA Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority CALM Department of Conservation and Land Management CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CR Critically Endangered DEC Department of Environment and Conservation DAA Department of Aboriginal Affairs DPaW Department of Parks and Wildlife (also shown as Parks and Wildlife) DRF Declared Rare Flora (also known as Threatened Flora) EN Endangered EPBC Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation IBRA Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia IRP Interim Recovery Plan IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGA Local Government Authority MDTFRT Moora District Threatened Flora Recovery Team MRWA Main Roads WA NP National Park NRM Natural Resource Management PEC Priority Ecological Community PICA Public Information and Corporate Affairs PTA Public Transport Authority SCB Species and Communities Branch SWALSC South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council TEC Threatened Ecological Community TFSC Threatened Flora Seed Centre UNEP-WCMC United Nations Environment Program World Conservation Monitoring Centre VU Vulnerable WA Western Australia 2 Interim Recovery Plan for Gastrolobium appressum Foreword Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife (Parks and Wildlife) Policy Statement No. 35 and Corporate Guideline No. 36 (DPaW 2015). Plans outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened flora or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Subfamily Classification of The
    LPWG Phylogeny and classification of the Leguminosae TAXON 66 (1) • February 2017: 44–77 A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) Recommended citation: LPWG (2017) This paper is a product of the Legume Phylogeny Working Group, who discussed, debated and agreed on the classification of the Leguminosae presented here, and are listed in alphabetical order. The text, keys and descriptions were written and compiled by a subset of authors indicated by §. Newly generated matK sequences were provided by a subset of authors indicated by *. All listed authors commented on and approved the final manuscript. Nasim Azani,1 Marielle Babineau,2* C. Donovan Bailey,3* Hannah Banks,4 Ariane R. Barbosa,5* Rafael Barbosa Pinto,6* James S. Boatwright,7* Leonardo M. Borges,8* Gillian K. Brown,9* Anne Bruneau,2§* Elisa Candido,6* Domingos Cardoso,10§* Kuo-Fang Chung,11* Ruth P. Clark,4 Adilva de S. Conceição,12* Michael Crisp,13* Paloma Cubas,14* Alfonso Delgado-Salinas,15 Kyle G. Dexter,16* Jeff J. Doyle,17 Jérôme Duminil,18* Ashley N. Egan,19* Manuel de la Estrella,4§* Marcus J. Falcão,20 Dmitry A. Filatov,21* Ana Paula Fortuna-Perez,22* Renée H. Fortunato,23 Edeline Gagnon,2* Peter Gasson,4 Juliana Gastaldello Rando,24* Ana Maria Goulart de Azevedo Tozzi,6 Bee Gunn,13* David Harris,25 Elspeth Haston,25 Julie A. Hawkins,26* Patrick S. Herendeen,27§ Colin E. Hughes,28§* João R.V. Iganci,29* Firouzeh Javadi,30* Sheku Alfred Kanu,31 Shahrokh Kazempour-Osaloo,32* Geoffrey C.
    [Show full text]