Automotive Technology and IP Outlook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Automotive Technology and IP Outlook -AttorneyAutomotive Confidential- Technology and IP OutlookSTG April 2016 Strategy and Technology M&A STG Intellectual Property Strategy and M&A for Technology and IP Silicon Valley | Boston www.SherpaTechnologyGroup.com Email: [email protected] Telephone: (617) 248-0030 -Attorney Confidential- STG Technology is transforming the automotive industry The Connected Car The Electric Car The Self-Driving Car The Shared Car The car as a wireless device, The car that is powered electrically The car that drives autonomously The car as a service computer, and entertainment system Connected Car Global Electric Vehicle % of Cars Partially Ridesharing Services Revenues ($B) 50 Global Sales 300 or Fully 25 Revenue ($B) 4 (thousands of cars) Autonomous 45 250 40 20 3 35 200 30 15 25 150 2 20 10 100 15 1 10 5 50 5 0 0 0 0 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2014 2015 Sources: SBD automotive; BCG; Research and Markets; http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-ride-sharing-business-playing-pundit.html 2 -Attorney Confidential- STG Technologies from other industries are driving this change Automotive technologies on What the auto Where the technologies the rise (examples) industry is saying originated (not automotive) “Visteon is investing in in-car technology… 5G wireless communications: which will enable automakers to quickly Semiconductors transition to 5G without having to tear up Telecommunications used for connected car the vehicle architecture.” systems -Martin Green, Telematics & Connected Mobile Devices Car Technology Manager at Visteon (SAE, Internet of Things 2016) “Many in the industry are concluding that LiDAR: sensory technology you need a LiDAR sensor on each of the Aviation (e.g., gyroscopes) used for four corners of the vehicle, with a 120° Geology sweep. The idea is to generate a point- safety and autonomous cloud of information around the vehicle.” Software vehicles -Jeff Owens, CTO of Delphi (SAE, 2016) Sensors “In this ‘second phase’ of vehicle electrification, there’s an even greater focus on full-system development. My Lithium batteries: used for company is not just a battery cell supplier Chemistry electric vehicles going forward, but part of holistic Energy propulsion-system development.” -Denise Gray, CEO of LG Chem Power Consumer Electronics (SAE, 2016) 3 -Attorney Confidential- STG New players entering the space – not the usual suspects Automotive incumbents New entrants Automotive manufacturers Tech companies Semiconductor companies Electric vehicle companies Faraday Future Automotive Suppliers Ride sharing companies Note: exemplary companies shown; not comprehensive 4 -Attorney Confidential- STG We see 4 critical strategic technology/IP issues in automotive Technology ownership battles 1 Whether incumbent auto companies want it or not, auto patent conflict is almost certainly ahead – impacting product launches and profit pools Rise of non-practicing entity (“NPE”) litigation 2 Plan on getting sued by NPEs for patent infringement, but in the current environment it isn’t quite as scary as you might think Development of new technology standards 3 Standards and the associated patent pools will become even more critical, and if you don’t handle them properly you may lose your competitive advantage Emergence of China 4 Chinese companies are emerging in automotive, but they will struggle to enter Western markets if they don’t acquire IP rights in the necessary geographies 5 -Attorney Confidential- Attention: STG Senior Executives What are the implications for automotive players? Technology/IP issues What to do about it . Automotive incumbents: Carefully file and acquire patents to prevent entrants from gaining traction; use IP for partnerships/supply chain relationships, lock in Technology 1 favorable cross licenses, and enforce selectively to slow entrants ownership battles . New entrants: You need the right patents ASAP to level the playing filed – file, acquire patents, and partner for technology access . All automotive players: Fight NPEs in court and at the PTO – take advantage of Rise of non- new laws allowing you to challenge their patents (e.g., file inter partes reviews); 2 practicing entity rather than viewing NPEs purely as threats, use them to your advantage – coopt (“NPE”) litigation them to get good deals on patents and/or partner with them . All automotive players: Get involved in standards bodies early to influence their Development of direction; build an IP portfolio that allows you to benefit from technology 3 new technology proliferation; and monetize your standard essential patents either through standards patent pools or other means . Emerging Chinese EV companies: Beef up your IP portfolios ASAP – file & buy Emergence of patents with global coverage 4 China . Automotive incumbents: Leverage your significantly larger patent portfolios to cut favorable deals with patent-poor Chinese EV companies, raise their technology costs, or shut them out of the market 6 -Attorney Confidential- STG Technology ownership battles Technology ownership battles 1 Whether incumbent auto companies want it or not, auto patent conflict is almost certainly ahead – impacting product launches and profit pools Rise of non-practicing entity (“NPE”) litigation 2 Plan on getting sued by NPEs for patent infringement, but in the current environment it isn’t quite as scary as you might think Development of new technology standards 3 Standards and the associated patent pools will become even more critical, and if you don’t handle them properly you may lose your competitive advantage Emergence of China 4 Chinese companies are emerging in automotive, but they will struggle to enter Western markets if they don’t acquire IP rights in the necessary geographies 7 -Attorney Confidential- 1 Technology ownership battles STG Automotive patent wars aren’t new – conflict in the early 1900s later drove cross-licensing stability for incumbents 1900 1899: Electric Vehicle Company purchased rights to George 1900: The Electric Selden’s patent for a three Vehicle Company cylinder, gas-powered motor launched patent vehicle infringement lawsuits against automotive 1904 1903: Organization licensing this companies patent became the Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers (“ALAM”); members of ALAM given a license and charged a 1.25% royalty on 1908 cars produced 1903: Ford denied a license and ALAM sued Ford 1909: Court ruled in favor for patent of the Selden patent infringement 1912 1911: Court of appeals found that the patent is invalid, thereby defeating the patent, but after ALAM had profited from years of licensing the rest of the industry Following the Selden automotive patent wars, there was a period of “patent peace” 8 -Attorney Confidential- 1 Technology ownership battles STG Telecom similarly experienced a period of stability, until disruption occurred with the advent of smartphones Examples – cases shown below only emphasize the most significant patent infringement lawsuits, but there were many others 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013+ The “smartphone wars” began in 2009 when Nokia sued Apple for patent infringement of 10 patents. Apple countersued and litigation in the space took off Litigation activity among the large smartphone companies declines as cases settle and cross-licensing agreements are reached US patent International International Licensed patents infringement Trade patent from lawsuit Commission infringement complaint lawsuit 9 -Attorney Confidential- 1 Technology ownership battles STG The smartphone patent wars were spawned by a shift in market leadership – incumbents were overtaken by new entrants Percentage of Global Mobile Phone Sales Other 21% 33% Other 4% 6% 7% 2% 3% 3% 13% 3% 4% 2% 4% 18% 10% 21% 33% 5% 10% 2005 2014 Source: http://www.statista.com/statistics/271574/global-market-share-held-by-mobile-phone-manufacturers-since-2009/ 10 -Attorney Confidential- 1 Technology ownership battles STG Most of the mobile device incumbents were overtaken 2002 Nokia releases the Nokia 7650 RIM releases Blackberry in June 2002, its first camera 5810, first smartphone phone and first phone to run optimized for wireless email on the Symbian OS Blackberry launches 2004 series of smartphones and begins to gain widespread adoption Nokia releases Nseries, Motorola Q released in 2005 as a thin first smartphone focused smartphone without a touchscreen on entertainment rather 2006 than business First iPhone released in 2007; In Nov. 2007, mobile devices become consumer Google announces products and not just business Android operating 2008 products system as open- source platform iPhone 3G released 2010 in 2008 and App HTC Dream, the first Store launched Android smartphone, released in 2008 2012 Motorola acquired by 2014 Google for $12.5B, In 2014, Microsoft announced in 2011 acquires Nokia’s phone business for $7.2B 11 -Attorney Confidential- 1 Technology ownership battles STG Will the same thing happen in automotive? Percentage of US Automobile Sales Other 21% ? 17% 16% ? 100% 14% ? 13% 10% ? 9% 2013 Future Sources: http://www.statista.com/statistics/343162/market-share-of-major-car-manufacturers-in-the-united-states/; http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-autosales.html 12 -Attorney Confidential- 1 Technology ownership battles STG Smartphone entrants realized they needed patents – so they spent billions on IP acquisitions Companies Involved Deal Type Date Deal Size Description of Patent Acquisition Google acquired Motorola Mobility, Google; Motorola Company 8/15/11 $12.5B largely
Recommended publications
  • HVRC's Guide to Phevs & Bevs in NY
    HVRC’s Guide to PHEVs & BEVs in NY hp://hudsonvalleyregionalcouncil.org/ev_guide (December 6, 2018) Baery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) ◮ BEVs/EVs have no gasoline engine ◮ have both an electric motor & a gasoline engine • 3x more eicient than gasoline cars, 100+ MPGe normal • still requires oil changes, emissions checks, etc. • no: oil changes, spark plugs, transmission, etc. • longer lasting regenerative brakes • longer lasting regenerative brakes • much beer mileage (MPG) than conventional vehicles Funding/Grants in N.Y. GHG Emissions ◮ cars Drive Clean Rebate - Point of Sale CO2/mile comparison for sedans: • • > 120 mi all-electric range $2000 o BEV 0.17 lbs • • PHEV 0.39 lbs 40-119 mi all-electric range $1700 o • • 20-39 mi all-electric range $1100 o ICE - regular car 0.96 lbs ◮ cars DEC’s ZEV rebate Garbage Truck GHG reductions in Metric Tons/yr • • CO2 72 10-50 mi. electric range $2,500 per vehicle • • 50+ mi. electric range $5,000 per vehicle NOx -0.0237 • PM10 -0.0010 trucks Class 3-8 NY Truck Voucher Incentive Program closed, re-opens Q1 2019 Municipalities Using BEVs & PHEVs Cost Savings - Light Duty ◮ Town of Bethel, NY - Smart Fortwo BEV ◮ Chula Vista, CA - 12 Ioniqs & 3 Bolts ◮ Switch to BEV saves $1,061/year in NY ◮ Hyasville, MD Police: Bolt ◮ L.A. estimates BEV save $0.16/mile ◮ $.37/mi vs $.21/mi BEV Transfer Station Truck in Chatauqua County ◮ Garbage Trucks • Motiv Power Systems: Chicago, L.A. & Sacramento • BYD: Palo Alto, CA saves 6,000 gallons/yr BEV Sedans MSRP PHEV Vehicles MSRP
    [Show full text]
  • Chargedevs.Com Electric Vehicles Magazine
    ELECTRIC VEHICLES MAGAZINE CHARGEDEVS.COM 2014 MEDIA KIT v1402 ISENTROPIC MEDIA ELECTRIC VEHICLES MAGAZINE EVs are here. Try to keep up. Industry activity and public interest in electric vehicles are at an all-time high, and we are dedicated to help bring EVs to prime time. Charged is a mirror for the EV industry, shining a light on the good ideas and innovators where we can find them, in our best effort to help connect the dots. Editorial Overview: Charged splits industry coverage into three categories: The Vehicles - In-depth features highlighting auto maker electrification strategies, fleet options, well-suited EV niches, racing, and other marketing efforts. The Tech - A closer look at pushing the limits of EVs through the beauty of well-engineered products - batteries, power electronics, and other EV-optimized automotive systems. The Infrastructure - Charging at home, at work, in public, and the implications for the utilities. Frequency: 6x Distribution: Charged is distributed to over 12,000 qualified subscribers. Hard copies are mailed direct to subscribers in North America and distributed at all of the leading industry events. International readers receive the popular digital edition, averaging over 78,000 views per issue. (All the digital issues, with current view counts, can be found at issuu.com/chargedevs/docs) Readership: Charged qualified subscribers are key decision makers throughout the electric vehicle industry, from small start-ups to the biggest automakers, independent design firms to Tier One suppliers, government officials
    [Show full text]
  • (ARRA): Plug-In Electric Vehicle and Infrastructure Analysis
    INL/EXT-15-35708 Plug-in Electric Vehicle and Infrastructure Analysis September 2015 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. INL/EXT-15-35708 Plug-in Electric Vehicle and Infrastructure Analysis Jim Francfort1 Brion Bennett1 Richard “Barney” Carlson1 Thomas Garretson2 LauraLee Gourley1 Donald Karner2 Mindy Kirkpatrick1 Patti McGuire1 Don Scoffield1 Matthew Shirk1 Shawn Salisbury1 Stephen Schey2 John Smart1 Sera White1 Jeffery Wishart3 September 2015 Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 http://avt.inl.gov Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 1 Idaho National Laboratory 2 Electric Applications Incorporated 3 Intertek Center for the Evaluation of Clean Energy Technology ABSTRACT Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC, is the managing and operating contractor for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport Data Revolution Investigation Into the Data Required to Support and Drive Intelligent Mobility March 2015
    The Transport Data Revolution Investigation into the data required to support and drive intelligent mobility March 2015 The Transport Data Revolution Acknowledgements This report has been prepared for the Transport Systems Catapult by Integrated Transport Planning Ltd, together with the expertise of White Willow Consulting, Advancing Sustainability, and the Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute at the University of Nottingham. The Catapult would like to express their gratitude to the project team for undertaking this work, which consisted of: Neil Taylor, Ian Stott, Jon Parker, Jim Bradley – Integrated Transport Planning Ltd. Andy Graham – White Willow Consulting Chris Tuppen – Advancing Sustainability Jeremy Moreley – Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute This research involving staging a number of workshops exploring the data requirements for intelligent mobility. The Catapult would like to express their gratitude to following persons who kindly spared their time for the purposes of this study: Frank Baxter – Southampton City Council Philip Kirk – Oxford Bus Company Roger Beecham – City University Robery Lee – BAE Systems Keith Bevis – Hertfordshire University Peter Lilley – Igeolise Nick Bromley – Greater London Authority Peter Miller – ITO! World Neil Brown – Sustainable Environment Vishnu Muralidharan – SBD Dan Clarke – Connecting Cambridgeshire Lee Omar – Red Ninja Studios Brad Cooper – DARTT Shane O’Neill – Elgin Mark Crosier – Prophesy Partners Carl Partridge – Fat Attitude Charlie Davies – Igeolise Maurizio Pilu
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD & Radio Disney School Assemblies
    South Natomas TMA Tim Taylor Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District [email protected] (916) 874-4814 Sacramento Clean Cities Coalition cleancitiessacramento.org Electric Vehicle Service Equipment (aka EVSE = Charging Stations) There are over 120 EVSE in Sacramento and the number is growing every day EVSE Level 1: 110v Level 2: 220v Level 3: 440v DC Fast Charge DriveClean.ca.gov Battery Electric Vehicles Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles CODA Chevrolet Volt Fiat 500e Ford C-MAX Energi Ford Focus Honda Accord Honda FIT Toyota Prius Mitsubishi I-MiEV Ford Fusion Energi Nissan LEAF VIA Motors (PU & Van) SmartFORTWO Tesla S Toyota RAV4 Toyota Scion IQ EVI (LHD Truck) State Vouchers from $900 - $2,500 Fed Tax Credits up to $7,500 Some Commercial PEVs Coda Nissan LEAF Ford Fusion Chevy Volt Mitsubishi i-MiEV Ford C-Max Energi Electric Vehicle Ride & Drive(s) • UC Davis 4/16 • VSP in Rancho Cordova 4/17 • Convention Center 4/19 • 11am – 2pm at Each Site Hot Italian EV Commitment Sacramento Region Pubic Access Natural Gas Infrastructure Sites Existing New Facilities • Sacramento: PG&E @ 5555 Florin • Sacramento: RT At McClellan Park (NE Perkins Rd Corner of Dudley Blvd. & Winters • Davis: PG&E @ 316 “L” St. – Davis Street • Elk Grove: Clean Energy @ 9050 • Sacramento: SATS at Fruitridge and Elkmont Dr Florin-Perkins (opening April, 2013) • Woodland: Yolo Transit @ 350 Industrial • Sacramento: RT at 29th and “O” Way (opening this summer) • Vacaville: PG&E @ 158 Peabody Rd. • Sacramento: Paratransit at 26th and • Auburn: PG&E @ 333 Sacramento St. Florin (opening in December 2013) • Marysville: PG&E @ 18 7th St.
    [Show full text]
  • ROAD TECH Addressing the Challenges of Traffic Growth
    ROAD TECH Addressing the challenges of traffic growth Written by: Road Tech Addressing the challenges of traffic growth 2 CONTENTS Perspectives 04 Foreword 07 Executive summary 08 Introduction 10 Chapter 1: Growing traffic concerns 13 Chapter 2: Advances in technology to address traffic growth 19 Chapter 3: Accelerating adoption of road technology 33 Conclusion 39 3 Road Tech Addressing the challenges of traffic growth PERSPECTIVES Road Tech: Addressing the challenges of traffic growth is an Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) report, commissioned by Abertis, which examines the role of technology and smart engineering in addressing issues arising from the growth in traffic. The findings are based on desk research and interviews with innovators and subject matter experts. The Economist Intelligence Unit would like to thank the following experts who participated in the interview programme (listed alphabetically): James Anderson, director of Greg Archer, Hari Balakrishnan, the Institute for Civil Justice in director, clean vehicles, chief technology officer RAND Justice, Infrastructure, Transport & Environment of Cambridge Mobile and Environment at RAND Telematics, and MIT professor Corporation “ Unless we get to grips “ Innovators are turning to “ It is a really hard with the growth in transport emissions from smartphones for traffic challenge because road data collection. “In a lot budgets are maintained vehicles, whether they be cars, vans or trucks, of places, the economics by so many different do not justify the entities with so many we
    [Show full text]
  • US Heavy-Duty Vehicle High Efficiency Technology Suppliers
    US Heavy-Duty Vehicle High Efficiency Technology Suppliers An Industry Segment Spanning America CALSTART Industry White Paper July 2016 PREFACE This report was researched and produced by CALSTART, which is solely responsible for its content. The report was researched primarily by Stephanie Yu with assistance from CALSTART technical and member service staff and written by Stephanie Yu and Bill Van Amburg, who also provided oversight. Information developed from the Innovators Roundtable and its resulting Synthesis findings document were part of collaboration between CALSTART and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Funding for this work was provided by the Energy Foundation. © 2016 CALSTART 2 CONTENTS PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................4 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................6 Need and Value of Industry Segment ....................................................................................................... 7 2. COMPANIES BY TECHNOLOGY AND REGION .............................................................................. 10 Major Category Breakdowns .................................................................................................................. 11 Observations on the Scale of the High
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet Greening Challenges & Opportunities
    Fleet Greening Challenges & Opportunities 2018 CIPMM Fleet Management Workshop November 6-7, 2018 Welcome! § Dan Stechysin – Managing Director § Adrian Cernea – Senior Consultant § CFS is a leading Canadian fleet management consulting firm providing specialized fleet consulting and analysis to public and private sector organizations since 1999. Latest News Update Quebec is piloting an electricOntario vehicle cutting back on incentivesCanadaenvironmental reaffirming program programs for used cars itsEV Incentivescommitment Program to- cancelled th Applicationseffectivethe Paris Julyaccepted 11Agreement, 2018through December Driveat the Clean31 G7 – discontinuedsummit in from st st the 1000AprilJune, limit1 , 2019 has2018, 2018 been even reached. though Latest News Update MORE LONG-RANGE FORDBP INVESTING AND GM IN GREEN BATTERY ELECTRIC ANNOUNCINGTECHNOLOGIES ELECTRIC VEHICLES REACHING PICKUPBP HAS RECENTLY TRUCKS AQUIRED THESEVERAL CANADIAN COMPANIES THAT MARKET FORDARE INVOLVEDF-150 PLUG-IN WITH HYBRID TO BE MOSTINTRODUCEDBATTERY MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURERS IN 2020 MODEL YEAR ARE NOWLINEUPAND OFFERING RAPID CHARGING PLUG-IN AND BATTERY ELECTRICSYSTEMS VEHICLE VERSIONS REDESIGNED CHEVROLET SILVERADO MADE-TO-FIT-ALL TYPES OF POWERTRAINS Outline Part 1: GHG Emissions and Fleet Greening Part 2: Green Planning to 2030 and Beyond Part 3: The Future of Green Vehicles - Discussion GHG Emissions and Fleet Greening Audience Question 1 Where does the term “Greenhouse Gas” come from? a. From the idea that these gases are emitted by the vegetation cultivated in greenhouses. b. From the fact that certain gases trap heat like the glass walls of a greenhouse. c. Before the Industrial Revolution, these gases were only found in greenhouses, hence the name. d. Dr. Hans Grünhaus was the one who discovered the effect of these gases on the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Per Hour of Charge
    THE COST TO CHARGE AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE POWERED BY Older model cars may not be on this list. Please refer to our EVSE Selector tool at www.clippercreek.com/charging-station-selector-tool/ COST PER HOUR OF CHARGE - RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICAL RATES Acceptance Cost Per Hour of Charge Miles per Hour Acceptance Cost Per Hour of Charge Miles per Hour Vehicle Rate (kW) $0.1269** per kWh of Charge* Vehicle Rate (kW) $0.1269** per kWh of Charge* Audi A3 E-Tron Nissan LEAF Cadillac ELR Nissan LEAF Plus 6.6 $0.84 26 Chevy Volt Toyota RAV4 Prime XSE Premium Fisker Karma Ford C Max Energi BMW ActiveE Ford Escape 2020 Jaguar I-Pace 7 $0.89 27 Ford Fusion Energi Range Rover P400e Hyundai Ioniq Plug-In Hybrid Hyundai Sonata Chevy Bolt Kia Niro Chevy Volt LT Upgrade and Premier Kia Optima Hyundai Ioniq 2020 Mercedes C350 Hybrid 3.3 $0.42 13 Hyundai Kona Mercedes GLE 550e Jeep Wrangler 4xe Mercedes S550 Hybrid Kia Niro 7.2 $0.91 28 MINI Cooper S E Countryman ALL4 Kia Soul Mitsubishi Outlander Porsche Cayenne S E-Hybrid Upg Nissan LEAF Porsche Panamera S E-Hybrid Upg Smart Car Porsche Panamera 4 E-Hybrid Upg Subaru Crosstrek Smart ForTwo Toyota Prius EV VW e-Golf Toyota Prius Prime EV Toyota RAV4 Prime SE, XSE BMW i3 7.4 $0.94 29 Volvo V60 Mercedes GLC 350e 2020 7.4 $0.94 13 Volvo XC90T8 MINI Cooper SE 7.4 $0.94 13 Polestar 2 7.4 $0.94 29 BMW 330e Volvo XC40 Recharge 7.4 $0.94 29 BMW 530e BMW 740e Audi Q5 Plug-In Hybrid 7.7 $0.98 11 BMW 745e Tesla Model 3 Standard 7.7 $0.98 30 BMW i8 BMW X3 xDrive30e Audi e-tron SUV BMW X5 xDrive40e Mercedes B Class B250e Porsche
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis
    Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis Richard Raustad Electric Vehicle Transportation Center Florida Solar Energy Center 1679 Clearlake Road Cocoa, FL 32922-5703 [email protected] Submitted as: Final Research Project Report EVTC Project 6 – Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis Submitted to: Ms. Denise Dunn Research and Innovative Technology Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 E-mail: [email protected] Contract Number: DTRT13-G-UTC51 EVTC Report Number: FSEC-CR-2053-17 February 2017 The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 1 Acknowledgements This report is a final research report for the Electric Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Analysis project of the Electric Vehicle Transportation Center (EVTC) at the University of Central Florida (UCF). The Electric Vehicle Transportation Center is a University Transportation Center funded by the Research and Innovative Technology Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The EVTC is a research and education center whose projects prepare the U.S. transportation system for the influx of electric vehicles into a sustainable transportation network and investigate the opportunity these vehicles present to enhance electric grid modernization efforts. The EVTC is led by UCF's Florida Solar Energy Center partners from UCF’s Departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, the University of Hawaii, and Tuskegee University.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicles & Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicles
    ELECTRIC VEHICLES & PLUGIN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CITY & BOROUGH OF WRANGELL, ALASKA April 26, 2013 Report Volume 1 Alaska Energy Authority Grant Agreement Number 7040070 Alaska Energy Authority GRANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 7040070 FINAL REPORT A feasibility study was conducted for the City of Wrangell regarding the use of electric vehicles (EV) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) as alternative modes of transportation for the city’s vehicles. This report is submitted in fulfillment of the Grant Agreement between the City of Wrangell and the Alaska Energy Authority. Alaska Energy Authority | Wrangell Electric Vehicle Feasibility Study Disclaimer This report has been prepared at the request of the City of Wrangell, Alaska, and the observations, conclusions, and recommendations contained herein constitute the opinions of WHPacific, Inc. WHPacific has prepared this report using in part web-based sources including information from private, public and government sectors. WHPacific does not take responsibility for errors or omissions within these sources. Our purpose was to provide the City of Wrangell with information that was the most current, relevant and reliable in an effort help the City develop a more comprehensive plan for the potential acquisition and implementation of electric vehicles, plug-in electric vehicles and the various derivatives within this evolving technology. WHPacific, Inc. Alaska Energy Authority | Wrangell Electric Vehicle Feasibility Study Purpose and Limitations of the Feasibility Study A feasibility study is an analysis of the viability of an idea. The development of this feasibility study focuses on helping answer the essential question of “should we proceed with the proposed project idea?” All activities of the study are directed toward helping answer this question.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Alternative Fuel & Advanced Technology Vehicle
    NORTH CAROLINA 2013-2014 CLEAN TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY DIRECTORY Note: Inclusion in this document does not confer product validation or endorsement. In addition, this document may not include all available alternative fuel options and suppliers. If you would like to be included in this list of technology providers contact [email protected]. This fact sheet contains information about: Click on following categories to jump to specific section Biodiesel Electric Vehicles Hybrid Electric Vehicles (Light Duty) Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles (Light Duty) Electric Low-Speed Vehicles Ethanol Natural Gas and Propane (CNG/LPG) Heavy Duty Vehicles Diesel Retrofit Technologies Idle Reduction Technologies Motor Oils Conservation BIODIESEL Biodiesel is a clean burning alternative fuel, produced from renewable resources. Pure biodiesel (B100) can be blended at any level with petroleum diesel to create a biodiesel blend. B20 (20 percent biodiesel and 80 percent petroleum diesel) and higher blends are widely available in North Carolina through a State Purchasing Contract (http://www.doa.state.nc.us/PandC/dynfuels/fuelcost.asp) in all 100 NC Counties and a network of local producers and distributors. Biodiesel fact sheet and NC biofuel retail & distributors: www.cleantransportation.org under Fact Sheets National Biodiesel Board: www.biodiesel.org Most diesel vehicles are currently operating on up to a 5 percent biodiesel blend (B5). Over the last several years, manufacturers have been designing for increased compatibility with
    [Show full text]