<<

THE IMMUNOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF OCULAR CICATRICIAL PEMPHIGOID

MARK J. ELDER1•2 and SUSAN LIGHTMANl.2 London

SUMMARY knowledge about the immune basis and pathophysiology Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid is an uncommon but of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. severe and potentially blinding systemic . It shares BULLOUS SKIN many pathophysiological features with the other bullous skin diseases such as dermatitis herpetiformis, bullous All of the bullous skin diseases may be associated with pemphigoid and vulgaris. All of these diseases cicatricial conjunctival changes but they are uncommon, have circulating antibodies that bind to the basement mild and frequently asymptomatic. These diseases membrane of mucous membranes. The individual dis­ include dermatitis herpetiformis,I,1 epidermolysis bull­ eases differ by each having a specific component of the osa,1,4-10 pemphigus vulgarus 1,3,11--16 and bullous pemphi­ - basement membrane complex as its antigen. In acute goid, 17 22 As a family of diseases, they all have circulating ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, the conjunctiva is infil­ antibodies to skin and mucous membrane basement mem­ trated with neutrophils, macrophages, Langerhans cells brane. Antibodies and complement are bound to the base­ and CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells while in the chronic disease ment membrane of lesional and non-Iesional skin, the conjunctiva is infiltrated mainly by CD8+ T-cells. However, the diseases differ by each having a unique CD4+ There is evidence of activation of these T-cells as component of the basement membrane as its antigen cells as shown by expression of the interleukin-2 receptor (Table I). The exceptions to this are that dermatitis herpeti­ and increased expression of major histocompatibility formis does not have a circulating antibod/ and the anti­ class II antigens within the tissue. The aetiology of the gen in pemphigus vulgaris is the intercellular cement fibrosis is unknown but increased amounts of several substance.12,13_ls The disease with the most severe ocular fibrogenic growth factors are demonstrable by consequences is ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. 1 immunohistochemistry. CLINICAL FEATURES OF OCULAR Clinically, cicatrising conjunctivitis may range from CICATRICIAL PEMPHIGOID asymptomatic subtarsal or canthal fibrosis to a complete obliteration of the fornices with total keratinisation of the Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) affects elderly 58-69 ocular surface. 1 The cicatrisiation may have a wide range patients, with a mean age at presentation of 66-77% of aetiologies including physical, chemical, pharmaceuti­ years.23-26 Ocular involvement occurs in of 7 cal, infectious, inflammatory and immune stimuli. 1 This cases.23-2 In an ophthalmic series, skin lesions were pres­ 9% cicatrisation may impair corneal function by a variety of ent in of cases.2S Other mucous membrane involve­ (15%), (12%) mechanisms. These include a dysfunction in any of the ment included the mouth nose and (9% three tear film layers, abnormal lid-globe contact or oeosphagus ).2S There is an association with HLA­ 1 *0301) movement, trichiasis, exposure, and a predisposition to DQw7 (DQB 28 and affected patients have a four­ blepharitis and keratitis. This paper summarises current fold increase in the prevalence of other autoimmune dis­ eases (p<0,01) - mainly rheumatoid arthritis but also From: 'Moorfields Eye Hospital, London; 'Institute of systemic erythematosus and polyarteritis nodosa.2s Ophthalmology, London, UK. Correspondence to: Mark Elder, MoorfieldsEye Hospital, City Road, The disease may be acute and associated with inflam­ London EC I V 2PD, UK. mation, or chronic and not associated with inflammation,

Eye (1994) 8, 196-199 © 1994 Royal College of Ophthalmologists OCULAR CICATRICIAL PEMPHIGOID 197

Table I. The immune-related cicatrising conjunctivitides brane are detected in about 50% of patients.30,32,34-38 This antibody is directed against basement membrane antigens Disease Antibody binding site of 230 kDa and/or 160-180 kDa. There is some cross­ Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid Lamina lucida of BMZ reactivity with bullous pemphigoid antigen.'8,33,39 Immu­ Dermatitis herpetiformis Sublamina densa region of BMZ noglobulins G and A and complement are bound to Epidermolysis bullosa Type VII procollagen in BMZ Pemphigus vulgarus Intercellular cement substance conjunctival basement membrane in up to 67% of Bullous pemphigoid 220 kDa glycoprotein in BMZ cases.25,33,36,40 The binding is strictly linear and is along the Stevens-Johnson syndrome Blood vessel wall superficial and deep aspects of the lamina lucida.'8 Vari­

BMZ, basement membrane zone, ous components of complement are bound to the basement membrane including Clq, C3, C4 and properdin/o,31,39,40 Progression of the ocular cicatrisation occurs in 75% of and complement may be activated via both the classical patients not receiving treatment.26,29 The cicatrisation may and the alternative pathway.41 Lysis of the desmosomal occur as a gradual event not associated with inflammation attachments of the basal layer of the epithelium causes the or in a stepwise manner during periods of acute inflam­ subepithelial bullae, which may be clinically manifest, mation.24,30,31 Surgically induced inflammation can cause especially involving the skin or mouth.42,43 rapid progression, such as may occur with entropion cor­ Further evidence for an autoimmune basis of the , - rection or cryotherapy. 26 30 33 disease comes from the development of an animal model Clinically, the sequence of progression is usually that of in rabbits,45 The injection of a monoclonal antibody into progressive shrinkage of the conjunctiva with symblepha­ basement membrane of conjunctival epithelium (MAb63) ron, development of cicatricial entropion of both upper causes conjunctival inflammation, neutrophil infiltration and lower lids, trichiasis, obliteration of the fornices, and basement membrane deposition of IgG in a pattern ocular surface keratinisation, diminution of the tear film similar to that seen in acute OCP. and eventual keratopathy. At any point there may be an Immunohistochemical studies25,33,40,44 have shown that exacerbation of conjunctival inflammation. the acute, ulcerative phase affects both the conjunctival IMMUNE FEATURES IN OCULAR epithelium and the substantia propria. The stromal CICATRICIAL PEMPHIGOID Circulating antibodies to conjunctival basement mem-

"

..,. • . ,

". I .. ,+ .

I '0 . :, .. .

. ' , \)

Fig. 2. Subacute ocular cicatricial pemphigoid stromal con­ Fig. 1. Acute ocular cicatricial pemphigoid showing intense junctiva showing T-cells staining positive for interleukin 2 infiltration with neutrophils in the conjunctival stroma and epi­ receptor suggesting activation. x500, (Courtesy of Dr W. thelium. x125. (Courtesy of Dr W. Bernauer.) Bernauer.) 198 M. J. ELDER AND S. LIGHTMAN

with a growth factor similar to the effect produced by TGF-�, PDGF, TNF or IL-l. This is consistent with immu­ nohistochemical findings of raised levels of TGF-� in acute disease and of TGF-�, PDGF and fibroblastgrowth factor in subacute OCP.33 The origin of these fibrogenic cytokines is unknown, but it is probable that they are pro­ duced by both acute and chronic inflammatory cell types.

CLINICAL RESPONSE TO SYSTEMIC DRUGS Further insight into the mechanisms involved in fibrosis can be gleaned from the response to various drug treat­ ments in OCP. Both dapsone25,37,49,5o and cyclophospha­ mide25,29,5o have been shown to reduce inflammation and impair or halt the progression of the fibrosis compared Fig. 3. Chronic ocular cicatricial pemphigoid stromal conjunctiva showing CD4+ T-cell infiltration. x312. (Courtesy with untreated controls. of Dr W Bernauer.) Dapsone is a sulphone and both inhibits the myelo­ peroxidase in polymorphonuclear leucocytes and stabil­ changes in acute disease are characterised by a marked ises lysosomal membranes. This reduces the release of infiltration of neutrophils (Fig. 1), macrophages, Langer­ lysosomal enzymes.51 It also suppresses migration of neu­ hans/dendritic cells and T lymphocytes compared with trophils to extravascular sites through inhibition of the normal controls. In addition, there is significantly adhesion required for neutrophil recruitment.52 Therefore, increased expression of the major histocompatibility class a response to dapsone is mainly due to inhibition of neu­ II antigen (HLA-DR), there are equal numbers of CD4+ trophil recruitment and function. and CD8+ T-cells and 4-10% of the T-cells stain positive Moderate doses of cyclophosphamide suppress both for interleukin 2 receptor, suggesting that they are acti­ B-cell and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. This leads to a sup­ vated33,40,44 (Fig. 2). Staining for transforming growth fac­ pression of both T-cell-mediated and humoral responses.53 tor-beta (TGF-�) is significantly increased. Therefore fibrosismay be inhibited by suppressing any or The subacute phase of the disease is histologically all of these cell lines. This points to a complex set of mech­ similar to acute disease although the CD4+/CD8+ ratio anisms that are involved in the aetiology of the fibrosis in drops to 0.4. The chronic phase is characterised by an infil­ OCP. This is further complicated by the number of growth tration with T lymphocytes (Fig. 3), HLA-DR expressing factors demonstrated by immunohistochemistry.33Further cells and macrophages which are mildly increased in research is necessary to dissect in detail the mechanisms number. The CD4+/CD8+ ratio is 0.5.33 Mild to severe of cicatrisation in these inflammatory processes. This subepithelial fibrosis may be found in any of the three would be expected to lead to much more effective thera­ clinical phases. peutic regimes that may have fewer systemic side effects. For the conjunctival epithelium, the acute disease reveals marked infiltration with neutrophils and Langer­ The authors are thankful to Dr W. Bernauer for his permission to hans cells. In chronic disease there is a similar cell profile include his work in this paper.

to normal conjunctiva. T-cell infiltrateand upregulation of Key words: T-cells, Cicatricial pemphigoid, Conjunctiva, Fibrogenic HLA-DR expression are not a feature of the epithelial cytokines, HLA-DR. disease. The epithelium may become thickened, metaplas­ REFERENCES tic and may keratinise at any phase. Overall, the popula­ tion of B-cells and plasma cells is no different to normal 1. Wright P. Cicatrizing conjunctivitis. Trans Ophthalmol Soc conjunctival epithelium or stroma at any stage of the UK 1986;105:1-17. 2. Hall RP. The pathogenesis of dermatitis herpetiformis: disease.33 recent advances. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16: 1129-44. Fibrosis results from the stimulation of fibroblasts, 3. Moschella SL, Pillsbury DM, Hurley HJ. Dermatology. often by fibrogenic growth factors. When quiescent fibro­ Vol. 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975:460-76. blasts are stimulated to proliferate by these modulators, 4. Gruis NA, Bavinck IN, Steijlen PM, Schroeff JG van der, there is transient expression of proto-oncogenes, includ­ Haeringen A van, Happle R et ai. Genetic linkage between the collagen VII (COL7Al) gene and the autosomal domi­ ing c-fos, c-myc and c-myb. These are a series of genes that nant form of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in two Dutch are transducers of external growth factors and probably kindreds. J Invest Dermatol 1992;99:528-30. trigger the activation of genes that are required for pro­ 5. Mooney E, Falk RJ, Gammon WR. Studies on complement liferation.46 Experimentally, c-fos and c-myc are expressed deposits in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and bullous after application of TGF-�, platelet-derived growth factor pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128:58-60. (PDGF), tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin 1 6. McDonnell PJ, Schofield OM, Spalton OJ, Eady RA. Eye involvement in junctional epidermolysis bullosa. Arch Oph­ (IL_1).46,47,54 Conjunctival fibroblasts from patients with 48 thaImol 1989;107:1635-7. active cicatricial pemphigoid express c-myc in vitro. 7. Richter HH, McNutt S. The spectrum of epidermolysis bull­ This suggests that these fibroblasts have been stimulated osa acquisita. Arch DermatoI1979;1l5:1325-8. OCULAR CICATRICIAL PEMPHIGOID 199

8. Woodley DT, Briggaman RA, O'Keefe El, Inman AO, phenomena inocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Am 1 Ophthal­ Queen LL, Gammon WR. Identification of the skin base­ mol 1977;83:443-50. ment-membrane autoantigen in epidermolysis acquisita. N 33. Bernauer W, Wright P, Dart lKG, Leonard IN, Lightman S. Engl 1 Med 1984;310:1007-13. The conjunctiva in acute and chronic mucous membrane 9. Yancey KB, Lawley TJ. The immunology of the skin. In: pemphigoid: an immunohistochemical analysis. Ophthal­ Middleton E, Reed CE, Ellis EF, editors. Allergy: principles mology 1993;100:339-46. and practice. St Louis: Mosby, 1988:206-23. 34. Dabelsteen E, Ullman S, Thomsen K. Demonstration of 10. Zierhut M, Theil Hl, Weidle EG, Steudhl KP, Sonnichsen K, basement membrane autoantibodies in patients with benign Schaumburg-Lever G. Ocular involvement in epidermolysis mucous membrane pemphigoid. Acta Denn Venereol bullosa acquisita. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:398-40l. 1974;54: 189-92. II. Bean SF, Halubar K, Gillett RB. Pemphigus involving the 35. Franklin RM, Fitzmorris CT. Antibodies against conjunc­ eyes. Arch DermatoI1975;111:1484-6. tival basement membrane zone. Arch Ophthalmol 12. Grando SA, Tennan AK, Stupina AS, Glukhenky BT, 1983;101:1611-13. Romanenko AB. Ultrastructural study of clinically unin­ 36. Leonard IN, Hobday CM, Haffenden GP. Immunofluores­ 1 volved skin of patients with pemphigus vulgaris. Clin Exp cent studies in ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Br Dermatol DennatoI 1991;16:359-63. 1988;118:209-17. 37. Person lR, Rogers RS III. Bullous and cicatricial pemphi­ 13. ludd K, Lever W. Correlation of antibodies in skin and goid: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic cor­ serum with disease severity in pemphigus. Arch Dermatol relations. Mayo Clin Proc 1977;52:54-66. 1979;115:428-32. 38. Waltman SR, Yarian D. Circulating autoantibodies in ocular 14. Kaplan R, Callen 1. Pemphigus associated diseases and pemphigoid. Am 1 OphthalmoI1974;77:891-94. induced pemphigus. Clin Dermatol 1983;1:42-7l. 39. Niimi Y, Zhu Xl, Bystryn le. Identification of cicatricial 15. Korman N. Pemphigus. 1 Am Acad Dermatol pemphigoid antigens. Arch Dennatol 1992;128:54-7. 1988;18: 1219-38. 40. Rice BA, Foster CS. Immunopathology of cicatricial pem­ 16. Moy R, lordan R. Immunopathology in pemphigus. Clin phigoid affecting the conjunctiva. Ophthalmology Dennatol 1983;1 :72-83. 1990;97: 1476-83. 17. Venning V, Frith P, Bron A, Millard P, Wojnarowska F. 41. lordan RE, Schroeter AL, Good RA. The complement Mucosal involvement in bullous and cicatricial pemphigoid: system in bullous pemphigoid. II. Immunofluorescent evi­ a clinical and immunopathological study. Br 1 Dermatol dence for both classical and alternate-pathway activation. 1988;118:7-15. Clin ImmunollmmunopathoI 1975;3:307-14. 18. Fine ID, Neises GR, Katz SI. Immunofluorescence and 42. Holubar K, Wolff K, Konrad K. Ultrastructural localization immunoelectron microscope studies in cicatricial pemphi­ of immunoglobulins in bullous pemphigoid skin. 1 Invest goid. 1 Invest Dermatol 1984;82:39-43. Dennatol 1975;64:220-27. 19. Zillikens D, Ambach A, Schuessler M, Dummer R, Hart­ 43. Diaz LA, Calvanico Nl, Tomasi TB. Bullous pemphigoid mann AA, Burg G. The interleukin-2 receptor in lesions and antigen: isolation from normal human skin. 1 Immunol serum of bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dennatol Res 1977;118:605-8. 1992;284:141-5. 44. Sacks EH, Wieczorek R, lakobiec FA, Knowles DM. Lym­ 20. Stanley lR. Bullous pemphigoid. In: legasothy BV, Lazarus phocytic subpopulations in the nonnal human conjunctiva: a GS, editors. Symposium on blistering disease. Dermato­ monoclonal antibody study. Ophthalmology 1986;93: logic clinics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1983:205-16. 1276-83. 21. Stanley lR, Woodley D, Katz S. Identification and partial 45. Roat MI, Sossi G, Thoft RA. Hyperproliferation of con­ characterisation of pemphigoid antigen extracted from junctival fibroblasts from patients with cicatricial pemphi­ 1 normal human skin. Invest Dennatol 1984;82:108-11. goid. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107: 1064-7. 22. Regnier M, Vaigot P, Michel S, Prunieras M. Location of 46. Liboiroat E, Pelosi E, Di Francesco P, Gallanari P, Petrini bullous pemphigoid antigen in isolated human keratino­ M, Sposi NM. The EL2 rat fibroblast line: differential cytes. 1 Invest DermatoI1985;85:187-90. effects of growth factors (EGF, PDGF, FGF, TPA and 23. Hardy KM, Perry HO, Pingree GC. Benign mucous mem­ TGF-�) on cell proliferation and c-fos expression. Ann NY brane pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol 1971; 104:467-75. Acad Sci 1987;511:318-28. 24. Foster CS, Wilson LA, Ekins MB. Immunosuppressive ther­ 47. Muller R, Bravo R, Burckhardt 1, Curran T. Induction of apy for progressive ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Ophthal­ c-fos gene and protein by growth factors precedes activation mology 1982;89:340-53. of c-myc. Nature 1984;312:716-20. 25. Foster CS. Cicatricial pemphigoid. Trans Am Ophthalmol 48. Hunt LE, Vergnes JP, Roat MI. Altered proto-oncogene soc 1986;84:527-663. expression by conjunctival fibroblasts in cicatricial pemphi­ 26. Mondino Bl, Brown SI. Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. goid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32(Suppl):938. Ophthalmology 1981;88:95-1 00. 49. Rogers RS III, Seehafer lR, Perry HO. Treatment of cicatri­ 27. Lever WF. Pemphigus and pemphigoid: a review of the­ cial (benign mucous membrane) pemphigoid with dapsone. advances made since 1964. 1 Am Acad Dermatol JAm Acad DermatoI1982;6:215-23. 1979;1:2-31. 50. Tauber J, Jabbur N, Foster CS. Improved detection of 28. Ahmed AR, Foster S, Zaltas M, Notani G, Awdeh Z, Alper disease progression in ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Cor­ CA, Yunis El. Association of DQw7 (DQBl *0301) with­ nea 1992;11:446-51. ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 51. Lang PG. Sulfones and sulfonarnides in dermatology today. 1991;88:11579-82. J Am Acad Dennatol 1979; 1:479-92. 29. Mondino Bl. Cicatricial pemphigoid and erythema multi­ 52. Booth SA, Moody CE, Dahl MV, Herron MJ, Nelson RD. forme. Ophthalmology 1990;97:939-52. Dapsone suppresses integrin-mediated neutrophil adher­ 30. Mondino Bl, Brown SI, Rabin BS. Autoimmune phenom­ ence function. J Invest Dermatol 1992;98:135-40. enon of the external eye. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol 53. Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rail TW, Murad F. The pharmac­ 1978;85:80 I. ological basis of therapeutics. New York: Macmillan, 1985. 31. Mondino Bl, Brown SI, Lempert S, lenkins MS. The acute 54. Lin JX, Vilcek J. Tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-l manifestations of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid: diagnosis cause a rapid and transient stimulation of c-fos and c-myc and treatment. Ophthalmology 1979;86:543-52. mRNA levels in human fibroblasts. J Bioi Chern 1987; 32. Mondino Bl, Ross AN, Rabin BS, Brown SI. Autoimmune 262:1 1908-11.