DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin TAS CAS Bulletin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin TAS CAS Bulletin Bulletin TAS CAS Bulletin 1 / 2011 Table des matières / Table of contents Message du Président du CIAS / Message of the ICAS President Message du Président du CIAS ...............................................................................................................................................1 Message of the ICAS President ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Articles et commentaires / Articles and commentaries The jurisprudence of the CAS in football matters (except Art. 17 RSTP) .......................................................................3 Jean-Phillipe Dubey Standing to sue, a procedural issue before the CAS ...........................................................................................................13 Estelle de La Rochefoucauld Status of the Player and Training Compensation ................................................................................................................21 Despina Mavromati Selected issues related to CAS jurisdiction in light of the jurisprudence of the Swiss Supreme Court ..................... 31 Despina Mavromati Jurisprudence majeure / Leading cases Arbitration CAS 2007/A/1396 & 1402 ................................................................................................................................ 41 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) & Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) v. Alejandro Valverde & Real Federación Española de Ciclismo (RFEC) 31 May 2010 Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1545 ..............................................................................................................................................58 Andrea Anderson, LaTasha Colander Clark, Jearl Miles-Clark, Torri Edwards, Chryste Gaines, Monique Hennagan, Passion Richardson v. International Olympic Committee (IOC) 18 December 2009 Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1545 ...............................................................................................................................................65 Andrea Anderson, LaTasha Colander Clark, Jearl Miles-Clark, Torri Edwards, Chryste Gaines, Monique Hennagan, Passion Richardson v. International Olympic Committee (IOC) 16 July 2010 Arbitrage TAS 2009/A/1828 & 1829 .................................................................................................................................... 75 Olympique Lyonnais c. US Soccer Federation (Sonia Bompastor) & US Soccer Federation (Camille Abily) 18 mars 2010 Arbitrage TAS 2009/A/1879 .................................................................................................................................................81 Alejandro Valverde Belmonte c. Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI) & Agence Mondiale Antidopage (AMA) & Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) 16 mars 2010 Arbitration CAS 2009/A/1880 & 1881 .................................................................................................................................99 FC Sion & E. v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) & Al-Ahly Sporting Club 1 June 2010 Arbitration CAS 2009/A/1881 ............................................................................................................................................. 118 E. v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) & Al-Ahly Sporting Club 7 October 2009 Arbitration CAS 2009/A/1909 .............................................................................................................................................124 RCD Mallorca SAD & A. v. FIFA & UMM Salal SC 25 January 2010 Arbitration CAS 2009/A/1912 & 1913 ...............................................................................................................................133 Claudia Pechstein & Deutsche Eisschnelllauf Gemeinschaft e.V. (DESG) v. International Skating Union (ISU) 25 November 2009 Arbitrage TAS 2009/A/1960 ...............................................................................................................................................148 Trabzonspor c. LOSC Lille Métropole & Arbitration TAS 2009/A/1961 LOSC Lille Métropole c. Trabzonspor & S. 5 mai 2010 Arbitration CAS 2009/A/1974 ............................................................................................................................................159 Nicolo Napoli v. S.C.F.C. Universitatea Craiova & Romanian Football Federation (RFF) 16 July 2010 Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2071 ............................................................................................................................................166 Irish Football Association (IFA) v. Football Association of Ireland (FAI), Daniel Kearns & Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 27 September 2010 Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2119 ..............................................................................................................................................177 International Federation of Body Building and Fitness (IFBB) v. International World Games Association (IWGA) 19 November 2010 Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2172 ............................................................................................................................................183 O. v. Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA) 18 January 2011 Jugements du Tribunal Fédéral / Judgments of the Federal Tribunal 4A_284/2009, Judgement of 24 November 2009, First Civil Law Court ....................................................................190 4A_624/2009, Arrêt du 12 avril 2010, Ire Cour de droit civil ........................................................................................196 4A_456/2009, Judgment of 3 May 2010, First Civil Law Court ....................................................................................200 4A_386/2010, Arrêt du 3 janvier 2011, Ire Cour de droit civil ......................................................................................209 Informations diverses / Miscellaneous Membres du CIAS 2011-2014/ICAS Members 2011-2014 ..............................................................................................223 ICAS Board/Bureau du CIAS ..............................................................................................................................................224 Publications récentes relatives au TAS/Recent publications related to CAS ...............................................................224 Message du Président du CIAS A la fin de l’année 2010, plusieurs changements mesures prises, un outil sera également utile à tous importants se sont produits au Conseil International les utilisateurs du TAS: le développement et la mise de l’Arbitrage en matière de Sport (CIAS): deux à jour de la base de données sur le site internet du nouveaux membres du CIAS, Me Göran Petersson TAS. La publication régulière du Bulletin TAS sera (Suède) et M. Patrick Baumann (Suisse), ont été également un important moyen pour diffuser les désignés; de plus un nouveau Bureau du CIAS a été informations du TAS. Le CIAS veillera également nommé, comité que j’ai le grand honneur de présider à ce que les arbitres et médiateurs du TAS puissent et qui se réunira plus souvent afin d’agir et de réagir consacrer le temps nécessaire pour se concentrer sur rapidement en dehors des réunions habituelles du leurs missions et les remplir conformément au Code CIAS. de l’arbitrage en matière de sport. La composition du nouveau Bureau du CIAS est la Le CIAS continuera à suivre avec attention les suivante: décisions rendues par le Tribunal fédéral suisse, qui est la seule instance capable d’annuler des décisions Me John Coates (Australie), Président; Me Gunnar du TAS. Dans la présente édition du Bulletin TAS, Werner (Suède), Premier Vice-Président; Me Michael vous constaterez que le Tribunal fédéral suisse a Lenard (Etats-Unis), Deuxième Vice-Président; rendu des décisions très importantes, en particulier Dr Nabil Elaraby (Egypte), Président de la Chambre au sujet du statut et de l’indépendance des arbitres d’arbitrage ordinaire; Dr Thomas Bach (Allemagne), du TAS et en ce qui concerne le pouvoir d’examen Président de la Chambre arbitrale d’appel. des formations du TAS en matière d’appel (Article R57 du Code; appel de novo). Enfin, le Tribunal fédéral Le Bureau du CIAS, en collaboration avec le suisse a également rappelé aux arbitres du TAS qu’il y Secrétaire général du TAS, Me Matthieu Reeb, avait certaines conditions et limites à la compétence contrôlera l’évolution du TAS et entreprendra toutes du TAS qui doivent être strictement observées. les réformes appropriées pour continuer à améliorer l’efficacité des services du TAS. Je vous souhaite une agréable lecture de cette nouvelle édition du Bulletin TAS. Parmi les mesures potentielles qui seront examinées dans un futur proche, le CIAS évaluera la tenue d’audiences du TAS par vidéo conférence. Bien qu’un tel système ne soit pas applicable en toutes circonstances, il peut favoriser des économies de temps et d’argent pour les parties, ainsi que pour John Coates le TAS. Le dépôt de mémoires écrits par courrier électronique sera également évalué mais un tel système devra être examiné avec soin étant donné qu’il devrait être accessible partout dans le monde et devrait garantir une sécurité totale lors du dépôt de documents. Le CIAS offrira également de nouvelles possibilités aux arbitres et médiateurs du TAS de poursuivre leur formation afin de garantir l’harmonisation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relation Between Exercise Performance and Blood Storage Condition and Storage Time in Autologous Blood Doping
    biology Review Relation between Exercise Performance and Blood Storage Condition and Storage Time in Autologous Blood Doping Benedikt Seeger and Marijke Grau * Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, 50677 Cologne, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-221-4982-6116 Simple Summary: Autologous blood doping (ABD) refers to sampling, storage, and re-infusion of one’s own blood to improve circulating red blood cell (RBC) mass and thus the oxygen transport and finally the performance capacity. This illegal technique employed by some athletes is still difficult to detect. Hence knowledge of the main effects of ABD is needed to develop valid detection methods. Performance enhancement related to ABD seems to be well documented in the literature, but applied study designs might affect the outcome that was analyzed herein. The majority of recent studies investigated the effect of cold blood storage at 4 ◦C, and only few studies focused on cryopreservation, although it might be suspected that cryopreservation is above all applied in sport. The storage duration—the time between blood sampling and re-infusion—varied in the reported literature. In most studies, storage duration might be too short to fully restore the RBC mass. It is thus concluded that most reported studies did not display common practice and that the reported performance outcome might be affected by these two variables. Thus, knowledge of the real effects of ABD, as applied in sport, on performance and associated parameters are needed to develop reliable detection techniques. Abstract: Professional athletes are expected to continuously improve their performance, and some might also use illegal methods—e.g., autologous blood doping (ABD)—to achieve improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Track Superstar Marion Jones' Duty and Liability to Her Olympic Relay Teammates
    DePaul Journal of Sports Law Volume 5 Issue 1 Fall 2008 Article 4 Passing the Baton: Track Superstar Marion Jones' Duty and Liability to Her Olympic Relay Teammates Jolyn R. Huen Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jslcp Recommended Citation Jolyn R. Huen, Passing the Baton: Track Superstar Marion Jones' Duty and Liability to Her Olympic Relay Teammates, 5 DePaul J. Sports L. & Contemp. Probs. 39 (2008) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jslcp/vol5/iss1/4 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Sports Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PASSING THE BATON: TRACK SUPERSTAR MARION JONES' DUTY AND LIABILITY TO HER OLYMPIC RELAY TEAMMATES I. INTRODUCTION In October of 2007, millions of avid sports fanatics, track and field aficionados, and Marion Jones enthusiasts felt the pain of their hearts breaking as the gold medal track star admitted to taking performance enhancing drugs.' The Olympian confessed to ingesting the steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG or "the clear") before the 2000 Olympic Games in Sydney, Australia. 2 After seven years of denial, Marion Jones pled guilty to lying to federal investigators about using the ster- oids and was subsequently punished by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) and the International Olympic Com- mittee (IOC).3 The question then remains:
    [Show full text]
  • A Legal Analysis of the WADA-Code Beyond the Contador Case
    A legal analysis of the WADA-code beyond the Contador case Faculty: Tilburg Law School Department: Social Law and Social Politics Master: International and European Labour Law Author: Lonneke Zandberg Student number: 537776 Graduation date: March 14, 2012 Exam Committee: Prof. dr. M. Colucci Prof. dr. F.H.R. Hendrickx Table of contents: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5 1. HISTORY OF ANTI-DOPING .................................................................................................... 7 2. WADA .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 The arise of WADA .............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 World Anti Doping Code 2009 (WADA-code) ..................................................................... 8 2.3 The binding nature of the WADA-code ............................................................................. 10 2.4 Compliance and monitoring of the WADA-code .............................................................. 11 2.5 Sanctions for athletes after violating the WADA-code ..................................................... 12 3. HOW TO DEAL WITH A POSITIVE DOPING RESULT AFTER AN ATHLETE HAS EATEN CONTAMINATED
    [Show full text]
  • Ol Groupe Sommaire
    OL GROUPE SOMMAIRE PROFIL & PANORAMA FINANCIER III INTERVIEW DU PRÉSIDENT IV-V ÉQUIPE MASCULINE VI-VII ÉQUIPE FÉMININE / ÉQUIPES JEUNES VIII-IX REVUE DES ACTIVITÉS 2013/2014 X CESSIONS, ACQUISITIONS ET MUTATIONS TEMPORAIRES DE JOUEURS XI STRATÉGIE ET PERSPECTIVES XII ÉQUIPES ET STAFF XIII CENTRE DE FORMATION XIV-XV RSE - AU CONFLUENT DES AXES STRATÉGIQUES DU GROUPE XVI-XVII PARC OLYMPIQUE LYONNAIS XVIII-XXI RÉSULTATS FINANCIERS XXII-XXIII LE CARNET DE L'ACTIONNAIRE XXIV-XXV EXERCICE 2013/2014 1 OLYMPIQUE LYONNAIS 2014 CONCEPTION : Actus, Zebrand CRÉDITS PHOTOS : S. Guiochon – R. Mouillaud / Le Progrès - © Populous - Intens - Cité Groupe AIA / Buffi / II PROFIL ORGANISÉ AUTOUR DE L’OLYMPIQUE LYONNAIS, CLUB DE FOOTBALL FONDÉ EN 1950 ET DIRIGÉ PAR JEAN-MICHEL AULAS DEPUIS 1987, OL GROUPE EST UN ACTEUR LEADER DU SECTEUR DU DIVERTISSEMENT ET DES MÉDIAS EN FRANCE. Depuis sa création en 1999, OL Groupe bâtit son développement sur un modèle précurseur qui allie récurrence et solidité financière autour de 5 produits d’activités complémentaires : • BILLETTERIE • PARTENARIATS ET PUBLICITÉ • DROITS MARKETING ET TV • PRODUITS DE LA MARQUE (produits dérivés, OL Images…) • TRADING DE JOUEURS PANORAMA FINANCIER 2013/2014 En juillet 2013, OL Groupe a lancé la construction, en pleine propriété, du Grand Stade. Ce stade ultra-moderne • PRODUITS DES ACTIVITÉS.................................120,5 M€ générera une nouvelle dynamique de croissance et de pérennisation des revenus du Groupe lui permettant • EXCÉDENT BRUT D’EXPLOITATION .................... - 7,5 M€ d’accroître sa compétitivité sportive et économique sur • RÉSULTAT OPÉRATIONNEL COURANT............. -24,9 M€ le plan européen. Le Groupe poursuit également sa stratégie de capitalisation sur son Centre de Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tdf 1996-2005.Pdf
    Tour de France Top Overall Three Finishers Noting Anti-Doping Rule Violations and Allegations Year First Second Third 1996 Bjarne Riis on May 25, 2007 Riis issued a press release that he Jan Ullrich Implicated in Operación Puerto and was barred from the Richard Virenque On October 24, 2000, he admits in a also had made "mistakes" in the past, and in the following press 2006 Tour de France and fired by his T-Mobile team. He received a French court to doping knowingly but not willingly. The conference confessed to taking EPO, growth hormone and two-year suspension for Puerto involvement (8/22/11 – 8/21/13), Swiss cycling association suspended him for nine months cortisone for 5 years, from 1993 to 1998, including during his and results disqualified since 5/1/2005. victory in the 1996 Tour de France. 1997 Jan Ullrich Implicated in Operación Puerto and was barred from Richard Virenque On October 24, 2000, he admits in a French court Marco Pantani In the 1999 Giro d'Italia, he was expelled the 2006 Tour de France and fired by his T-Mobile team. He to doping knowingly but not willingly. The Swiss cycling association due to his irregular blood values. Although he was received a two-year suspension for Puerto involvement (8/22/11 suspended him for nine months disqualified for "health reasons", it was implied that – 8/21/13), and results disqualified since 5/1/2005. Pantani's high hematocrit was the product of EPO use. Later, it was revealed he had a hematocrit level of 60 per cent after his crash in 1995, above the later limit of 50.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Olympic Trials
    Volume 7, No. 40 July 11, 2008 Version 1 Anderson 10.98w; 5. Joyce 11.16w; 6. Roseby 11.19w; 7. Layne 11.27w; 8. — Women’s Olympic Trials — Jordan 11.29w. II(0.7)–1. Jeter 10.97 PR; 2. Felix 10.98; EUGENE, OREGON 11.16; 3. A. Williams 11.06; 4. Knight 11.07 PR (5, JUNe 27–30, JULy 3–6 6. Tawanna Meadows (Troy) 11.48. =5 WJ; 2, 2 AJ); 5. Weatherspoon 11.08 PR; II(3.5)–1. Felix 11.01w; 2. Gloria Asumnu 6. Solomon 11.16; (adidas) 11.10w; 3. Lynne Layne (Tn) 11.18w; 7. Gaines 11.24; 8. M. Barber 11.29. — 100 METERS — 4. Alexis Joyce (unat) 11.21w; III(2.3)–1. Edwards 10.85w (0.143); 2. Lee FINAL 5. Amber Robinson (unat) 11.38w; 6. 10.89w (0.149); 3. Asumnu 11.02w; 4. Moore (June 28; wind +0.5) Melinda Smedley (unat) 11.42w; 7. Juanita 11.04w; 5. L. Barber 11.10w; 1. Muna Lee (Nike) ........................... 10.85 Broaddus (LSU) 12.44w. 6. Guy 11.17w; 7. Myrick 11.19w; 8. PR (9, x A) III(1.1)–1. Edwards 11.16 (rt 0.112); 2. A. Durst 11.26w. Williams 11.26; 3. Alexis Weatherspoon (unat) 2. Torri Edwards (Nike) ..................... 10.90 11.30 PR; 4. Wyllesheia Myrick (unat) 11.33; SEMIS (defending US champ) 5. Stephanie Durst (unat) 11.34; (June 28; qualify 4) 3. Lauryn Williams (Nike) ................. 10.90 6. Jessica Onyepunuka (USC) 11.48; 7. I(3.2)–1.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOMI-NET Working Paper No. 1
    WILLIAMS, J. (2011), “Women’s Football, Europe and Professionalization 1971-2011: Global Gendered Labor Markets”, foomi-net Working Papers No. 1, http://www.diasbola.com/uk/foomi-source.html FOOMI-NET www.diasbola.com Working Paper No. 1 Author: Jean Williams Title: Women’s Football, Europe and Professionalization 1971-2011: Global Gendered Labour Markets Date: 20.09.2011 Download: http://www.diasbola.com/uk/foomi-source.html Women’s Football, Europe and Professionalization 1971- 2011: Global Gendered Labour Markets Jean Williams Introduction A recently-published survey aimed at Britain's growing number of family historians, had, as its primary aim, to convey 'the range and diversity of women's work spanning the last two centuries - from bumboat women and nail-makers to doctors and civil servants - and to suggest ways of finding our more about what often seems to be a 'hidden history'.i Professional women football players are part of this hidden history. More surprisingly, no athletes were listed among the 300 or so entries, either in a generalist or specific category: perhaps, because of the significance of amateurism as a prevailing ethos in sport until the 1960s. Another newly-released academic survey by Deborah Simonton Women in 1 WILLIAMS, J. (2011), “Women’s Football, Europe and Professionalization 1971-2011: Global Gendered Labor Markets”, foomi-net Working Papers No. 1, http://www.diasbola.com/uk/foomi-source.html European Culture and Society does makes reference to the rise of the female global sports star, beginning with Suzanne Lenglen's rather shocking appearance in short skirt, bandeau and sleeveless dress at Wimbledon in 1919 onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Track Referee Examination 2009-2012 Olympiad Edition
    USATF National Officials Committee Master Track Referee Examination 2009-2012 Olympiad Edition nstructions: This is an open book test but it is required that you take it as an individual. The questions are I not in any particular order. You should not discuss your answers with anyone else. You should use the 2008 or later USATF Competition Rules and NCAA Rules to complete this test. You will need to give the appropriate rule references when completing the questions in Section 3. Section 1 contains true-false or multiple choice questions. Generally each question is worth one point unless otherwise indicated. Section 2 contains various rule applications. The value of each question is shown in the parenthesis. Section 3 contains situations that you might rule on as a referee. To get full credit for these discussion questions, please list as many alternatives as you can think of, indicate your chosen decision, reference the appropriate rule by number and explain why you have made the decision you have chosen. Some questions have no clear right answer. The goal of this examination is to assess your approach to refereeing and your application of the rules when there is no direct answer in the book. The rational for your answer is the most important element of your answer. This section contains the majority of the points. Please write or type your answers clearly on the ANSWER SHEET provided and return it to your Certification Chair for review and grading. If you need more room for a particular answer, clearly label any additional sheets with the question number and indicate on the main answer sheet that there is additional discussion on an attached sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Contents
    Summary Contents Authors’ preface ............................................................................................................ V Contents ....................................................................................................................... XV Bibliography ................................................................................................................. XXXIX List of Abbreviations LXXIII Chapter 1 Introduction and Basic Principles ................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 The Arbitration Agreement and the Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal 73 Chapter 3 The Arbitral Tribunal ................................................................................... 173 Chapter 4 The Arbitral Procedure .................................................................................. 243 Chapter 5 Conditions of Admissibility .......................................................................... 339 Chapter 6 The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Case ......................................... 391 Chapter 7 The Award .................................................................................................... 423 Chapter 8 Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards ...................................... 521 Chapter 9 Treaty-based Investment Arbitration........................................................... 575 Chapter 10 Sports Arbitration ........................................................................................ 613 Table of Cases
    [Show full text]
  • December 31, 2010}
    Volume 12, Number 2 {coverage from July 1 Æ December 31, 2010} AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION DECISIONS United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) v. LaShawn Merritt, AAA No. 771900029310 (Oct., 2010). Merritt tested positive for the prohibited substance DHEA and pregnenolone three separate times. Merritt claims that he ingested the substance by accident, but he does admit that he tested positive as a result of ingesting ExtenZe, a product used for enhanced sexual performance. USADA agreed that the positive results were caused by ExtenZe, and as such represent an accidental ingestion. The panel found that Merritt was not significantly negligent and reduced the required two-year ineligibility status to twenty-one months, starting October 28, 2009 and ending July 27, 2011. He is also prohibited from participating in and accessing the U.S. Olympic Training Facilities during this period. United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) v. Kirk O’Bee, AAA No. 771900051509JENF (Oct., 2010). Cyclist O’Bee committed his second anti-doping violation when he tested positive for recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), eight years after testing positive for testosterone. USADA was also able to prove that O’Bee either used or possessed HGH as early as September 2005, and used testosterone after his first suspension. The panel imposed a lifetime suspension and disqualified his cycling results from October 3, 2005 through July 29, 2009, the date of his suspension from the sport. ANTITRUST LAW Race Tires Am., Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp., 614 F.3d 57 (3d Cir. 2010). Plaintiff, a specialty tire manufacturer filed a complaint, naming Hoosier (a competitor tire manufacturer) and DMS (a motorsports sanctioning body) as Defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • EL MUNDO Biografía No Autorizada De Alberto Contador (Solomillo
    EL MUNDO Biografía no autorizada de Alberto Contador (solomillo incluido) 7/08/2017 Luis Fernando López Podría ocurrir: Alberto Contador, en su última carrera y en su último día, el próximo 10 de septiembre, sube al podio final de la Vuelta a España y el público le abuchea. Podría ocurrir, pero no va a ocurrir; no veremos a Contador sufrir una escena como las vividas estos días en el Mundial de atletismo, donde el público ha despreciado a Gatlin por su pasado de dopaje con recurrentes pitadas (el silencio a veces es más sonoro). No es el público español más respetuoso que el inglés, no, pues también aquí gusta mucho silbar; basta repasar las finales de Copa del Rey, el cariño que una parte de la grada le dispensa a Piqué cuando acude con la selección o algunas sinfonías antes de partidos de La Roja (oé, oé). Pero a Contador no se le pitará. Madrid/España no es Londres. Y bien está. Pero, ¿le aplaudimos como si nada? Más preguntas: ¿Tiene derecho al perdón quien se ha dopado? Si somos capaces de 'olvidar' crímenes u ofensas mayores, ¿por qué no íbamos a hacerlo con un deportista que se equivocó/nos engañó una vez? Pero, claro, depende. ¿Cuántas veces se equivocó y nos engañó Contador? Una noche de julio de 2006, apenas un mes después de ser detenido en la 'operación Puerto' como cabecilla de una trama de dopaje, Eufemiano Fuentes, un 'teórico' de las autotransfusiones con EPO, acudió a 'El Larguero' para explicarse, al fin. De lo que dijo, a quien esto escribe, que es periodista pero no de los especializados en ciclismo, le sorprendió algo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Characteristics of an Offer in CISG and PECL, 14 Pace Int'l L
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Pace Pace International Law Review Volume 14 Article 4 Issue 1 Spring 2002 April 2002 The hC aracteristics of an Offer in CISG and PECL Predrag Cvetkovic Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation Predrag Cvetkovic, The Characteristics of an Offer in CISG and PECL, 14 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 121 (2002) Available at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol14/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAYS THE CHARACTERISTICS OF AN OFFER IN CISG AND PECL Predrag Cvetkovict I. Animus Contrahendi .............................. 122 II. The "Sufficient Definition" of an Offer ............. 122 III. The Determination of Offer Ad Personam ......... 130 Both CISG Article 14(1) and PECL Article 2.101 recognize the traditional "offer-acceptance" model of contracting.' The PECL also has a provision, Article 2.211, which deals with con- tracts not concluded through the traditional offer and accept- ance mode. Offer-acceptance, the only model explicitly addressed in the CISG, is the principal model in most legal systems of the world. However, it seems to be universally agreed that rules on the traditional model of offer-acceptance can be applied by way of analogy to other models, insofar as this is reasonable and with appropriate adaptations.
    [Show full text]