DOCSLIB.ORG

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 Haverford College

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Image description. Cover Image End of image description. What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from all institutions that provide postsecondary education and are eligible to receive Title IV funding across the United States and other U.S. jurisdictions. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/), an online tool to aid in the college search process. Additional information about IPEDS can be found on the website at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? The figures in this report provide a selection of indicators for your institution to compare with a group of similar institutions. The figures draw from the data collected during the 2019-20 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. The inside cover of this report lists the pre-selected comparison group of institutions and the criteria used for their selection. The Methodological Notes at the end of the report describe additional information about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previously released Data Feedback Reports from 2005 and customize this 2020 report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To learn how to customize the 2020 report, visit this resource page https://nces.ed.gov/Ipeds/Help/View/2. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report, visit the ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds and click on Data Feedback Report. Haverford College Haverford, PA Haverford College COMPARISON GROUP Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s indicators. If your institution did not define a custom comparison group for this report by July 13, 2020 NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define the comparison group appears below.) The customized Data Feedback Report function available at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/ can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups. The custom comparison group chosen by Haverford College includes the following 48 institutions: Amherst College (Amherst, MA) Bates College (Lewiston, ME) Bowdoin College (Brunswick, ME) Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr, PA) Bucknell University (Lewisburg, PA) Carleton College (Northfield, MN) Centre College (Danville, KY) Claremont McKenna College (Claremont, CA) Colby College (Waterville, ME) Colgate University (Hamilton, NY) College of the Holy Cross (Worcester, MA) Colorado College (Colorado Springs, CO) Davidson College (Davidson, NC) Denison University (Granville, OH) Dickinson College (Carlisle, PA) Earlham College (Richmond, IN) Franklin and Marshall College (Lancaster, PA) Gettysburg College (Gettysburg, PA) Grinnell College (Grinnell, IA) Hamilton College (Clinton, NY) Juniata College (Huntingdon, PA) Kenyon College (Gambier, OH) Lafayette College (Easton, PA) Lawrence University (Appleton, WI) Macalester College (Saint Paul, MN) Middlebury College (Middlebury, VT) Mount Holyoke College (South Hadley, MA) Muhlenberg College (Allentown, PA) Oberlin College (Oberlin, OH) Occidental College (Los Angeles, CA) Pomona College (Claremont, CA) Reed College (Portland, OR) Rhodes College (Memphis, TN) Scripps College (Claremont, CA) Skidmore College (Saratoga Springs, NY) Smith College (Northampton, MA) Swarthmore College (Swarthmore, PA) The University of the South (Sewanee, TN) Trinity College (Hartford, CT) Union College (Schenectady, NY) Ursinus College (Collegeville, PA) Vassar College (Poughkeepsie, NY) Washington & Jefferson College (Washington, PA) Washington and Lee University (Lexington, VA) Wellesley College (Wellesley, MA) Wesleyan University (Middletown, CT) Whitman College (Walla Walla, WA) Williams College (Williamstown, MA) The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas: Topic Area Figures Pages 1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) 1 and 2 3 2) Student Enrollment 3, 4 and 5 3 and 4 3) Awards 6 4 4) Charges and Net Price 7 and 8 4 and 5 5) Student Financial Aid 9 and 10 5 6) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 5, 6, 7 and 8 8) Finance 18 and 19 8 9) Staff 20 and 21 9 10) Libraries* 22 and 23 9 *These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFRs), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 Haverford College Figure 1. Number of first-time undergraduate students who Figure 2. Percent of first-time undergraduate applicants admitted, applied, were admitted, and enrolled full and part time: and percent of admitted students enrolled full and part Fall 2019 time: Fall 2019 Image description. Image description. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of students. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of students. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Applied institution (N=48). 4963. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Admitted. institution 16. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Admitted (N=48). Group Median 6630. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Enrolled full Group time. Median (N=48) 32. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 810. Median 2082. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 45. Median (N=48) 29. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution full time 363. (N=48). ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution part time.0.01. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Enrolled part Group time Median (N=9). 510. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=48) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group No data.MedianAdmissions 0.01. measure line, Shape Label: Admissions measure Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=48) InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median 4,963 Applied 16 (N=48) 6,630 Admitted 32 Admitted 810 (N=48) 2,082 45 Enrolled full time 29 Enrolled full time 363 (N=48) 510 0 Enrolled part time Enrolled part time 0 (N=9) 0 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Number of students Percent of students Your institution Comparison Group Median Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=48) NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. See 'Use of Median Values for the comparison group. Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, in the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2019-20, Admissions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2019-20, Admissions component. Figure 3. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2019 Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled American Percent. Indian or Alaska Native. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=48) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Asian. institution 12. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Black or African Group American. Median (N=48) 6. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 6. Median (N=48) 5. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Hispanic/ institution Latino. 9. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Native Hawaiian Group or Median other Pacific(N=48) Islander. 9. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=48) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your White. institution 52. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Two or more Group races. Median (N=48) 62. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 7. Median (N=48) 5. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Race/ethnicity institution 2. unknown. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Nonresident Group alien. Median (N=48) 2. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 12. Median (N=48) 10. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Women. institution 53. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=48) 54. Race/ethnicityShape or gender line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=48) 90 80 70 62 60 52 53 54 50 Percent 40 30 20 12 12 9 9 10 7 10 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 American Indian or Asian Black or African Hispanic/ Native Hawaiian or White Two or Race/ethnicity Nonresident alien Women Alaska Native American Latino other Pacific Islander more races unknown Race/ethnicity or gender Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=48) NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See 'Use of Median Values for Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2020, Fall Enrollment component.
Recommended publications
  • Below Is a Sampling of the Nearly 500 Colleges, Universities, and Service Academies to Which Our Students Have Been Accepted Over the Past Four Years

    Below Is a Sampling of the Nearly 500 Colleges, Universities, and Service Academies to Which Our Students Have Been Accepted Over the Past Four Years

    Below is a sampling of the nearly 500 colleges, universities, and service academies to which our students have been accepted over the past four years. Allegheny College Connecticut College King’s College London American University Cornell University Lafayette College American University of Paris Dartmouth College Lehigh University Amherst College Davidson College Loyola Marymount University Arizona State University Denison University Loyola University Maryland Auburn University DePaul University Macalester College Babson College Dickinson College Marist College Bard College Drew University Marquette University Barnard College Drexel University Maryland Institute College of Art Bates College Duke University McDaniel College Baylor University Eckerd College McGill University Bentley University Elon University Miami University, Oxford Binghamton University Emerson College Michigan State University Boston College Emory University Middlebury College Boston University Fairfield University Morehouse College Bowdoin College Florida State University Mount Holyoke College Brandeis University Fordham University Mount St. Mary’s University Brown University Franklin & Marshall College Muhlenberg College Bucknell University Furman University New School, The California Institute of Technology George Mason University New York University California Polytechnic State University George Washington University North Carolina State University Carleton College Georgetown University Northeastern University Carnegie Mellon University Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Things Get Heated in the Kitchen: Sodexo Controversy Is Fueled by Moravian Students by Katie Makoski Reporter

    Things Get Heated in the Kitchen: Sodexo Controversy Is Fueled by Moravian Students by Katie Makoski Reporter

    t he Volume CXXIV, Issue NumberCOMENIAN 6 Moravian College’s Student Newspaper Thursday, March 3, 2011 Things Get Heated in the Kitchen: Sodexo Controversy is Fueled by Moravian Students By Katie Makoski Reporter Recently, miscommunications among students and staff have led to much confusion and controversy surrounding Moravian’s dining services. The tension finally came to a boil on February 10, when junior Armando Chapelliquen and adjunct political science professor Faramarz Farbod hosted a formal discussion concerning the allegations that Sodexo, Moravian’s food supplier, is guilty of human rights violations. Immediately upon hearing this, Don, a worker in the Marketplace, avidly defended his boss. He asserted that in the thirty-five years that he has worked for Sodexo, he has never had a problem with the company. He further stated that if Moravian were to cut ties with Sodexo there would be a chance that he and some of his coworkers would lose their jobs. photo courtesy of www.seiu21la.org Members of the dining services staff attended the discussion in order to voice these concerns. Another cause for confusion was the petition expressing dissatisfaction with Moravian’s dining services that was signed by four hundred students last semester. The petition, which called for an end to mandatory meal plans for freshman and residents of certain dorms, more options for people with dietary restrictions, and more respect for the workers, was unrelated to the discussion. In fact, these issues are not the fault of the Sodexo Sodexo is the twenty-first largest corporation in the years and has pledged to continue to donate millions of Corporation—it is Moravian College that determines world, with 380,000 workers in eighty different countries.
  • Scholarly Communications and the Role of the Liberal Arts College Library Diane J

    Scholarly Communications and the Role of the Liberal Arts College Library Diane J

    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Library Faculty Research Coates Library 2013 Scholarly Communications and the Role of the Liberal Arts College Library Diane J. Graves Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/lib_faculty Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Repository Citation Graves, D.J. (2013). Scholarly communications and the role of the liberal arts college library. In P. Hernon & J.R. Matthews (Eds.), Reflecting on the future of academic and public libraries (114-119). Chicago, IL: American Library Association. This Post-Print is brought to you for free and open access by the Coates Library at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Library Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scholarly communications and the role of the liberal arts college library By Diane J. Graves University Librarian and Professor Trinity University, San Antonio TX1 A little economic history The conversation on scholarly communication (often referred to as a “crisis”) has its origins in the mid- 1980s. At that time, the balance of trade between the United States and its trading partners in Europe was so far out of balance that American products could not compete internationally. The Reagan Administration, seeking to correct the problem, devalued the dollar at the so-called Plaza Accord on September 22, 1985.i In that moment, the price of journals in many Scientific, Technical, Engineering and Medical (STEM) fields, jumped—in some cases by as much as 25%. Many of the top journals were published by British or European for-profit houses, such as Pergamon, Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, Blackwell’s, Taylor & Francis, and others.
  • Lafayette College: Staying Ahead of the Game

    Lafayette College: Staying Ahead of the Game

    Vol. 15 LAFAYETTE COLLEGE: STAYING AHEAD OF THE GAME Lafayette College’s football history is as rich as it is varied, from laying claim to the the first use of the helmet in 1896, to the long standing rivalry with nearby Lehigh University dating back to 1884. But these days, it is the Leopards’ future that has taken on even greater importance. With the opening of the Bourger Varsity Football House, Lafayette’s team has entered into a league all its own. The 24,000 square-foot building, part of a $23 million stadium renovation, contains the team’s locker room, strength and conditioning areas, and sports medicine facilities, including a hydrother- apy room. The upper level houses coaches’ offices, each with a flat screen display for reviewing games, several meeting rooms equipped with custom control systems and full presentation capabilities, and one room large enough to accommodate the entire team. That area, which can also be divided into four separate units, features the same level of class- room technology found across the campus. “The experience we have with our smart classroom tech- nology allowed us to easily adapt to this rather unique setting with great results, ” stated E.J. Hudock, Academic Technology Facilities Manager for Lafayette. One of the very special features of the Bourger Varsity Football House is the highly personalized conference room on the second floor. The program- ming team at Vistacom worked with Lafayette to develop special graphic elements for the control system interface such as helmets for source buttons and a log in system utilizing the jersey numbers which are displayed on top of a Leopard’s jersey graphic.
  • College Fair RSVP 2019

    College Fair RSVP 2019

    College & Career Fair Representatives (as of 9/13/19) Texas Colleges & Universities: Out of State Colleges & Universities Continued: Art, Culinary, Design, Fashion and Film: Abilene Christian University* Abilene,TX Juniata College* Huntingdon, PA Columbus College of Art & Design Columbus, Ohio Angelo State University San Angelo, TX Kansas State University Manhattan KS Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts Austin, TX Austin College* Sherman, TX Lehigh University* Bethlehem PA FIDM Los Angeles, CA Austin Community College Austin, TX Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA Full Sail University Winter Park, FL Baylor University* Waco, TX Loyola University New Orleans* New Orleans, LA New York Film Academy New York, NY Dallas Baptist University* Dallas, TX Miami University Oxford, Ohio Hardin-Simmons University* Abilene, TX Michigan State University East Lansing, MI International Colleges & Universities: Howard Payne University Brownwood, TX Millsaps College* Jackson, MS IE University, Spain Madrid/Segovia, Spain Our Lady of the Lake University* San Antonio, TX Mississippi State University Starkville, MS Nottingham Trent University Nottingham, England Schreiner University* Kerrville, TX Missouri University of Science & Technology Rolla, MO University of St Andrews St Andrews, Scotland Southern Methodist University* Dallas, TX Northeastern University Boston, MA University of Strathclyde Scotland, UK Southwestern University* Georgetown, TX Northwestern University* Evanston, IL Franklin University Switzerland Lugano, Switzerland St. Edward's
  • FICE Code List for Colleges and Universities (X0011)

    FICE Code List for Colleges and Universities (X0011)

    FICE Code List For Colleges And Universities ALABAMA ALASKA 001002 ALABAMA A & M 001061 ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY 001005 ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY 066659 PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND C.C. 001008 ATHENS STATE UNIVERSITY 011462 U OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE 008310 AUBURN U-MONTGOMERY 001063 U OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS 001009 AUBURN UNIVERSITY MAIN 001065 UNIV OF ALASKA SOUTHEAST 005733 BEVILL STATE C.C. 001012 BIRMINGHAM SOUTHERN COLL ARIZONA 001030 BISHOP STATE COMM COLLEGE 001081 ARIZONA STATE UNIV MAIN 001013 CALHOUN COMMUNITY COLLEGE 066935 ARIZONA STATE UNIV WEST 001007 CENTRAL ALABAMA COMM COLL 001071 ARIZONA WESTERN COLLEGE 002602 CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY 001072 COCHISE COLLEGE 012182 CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY 031004 COCONINO COUNTY COMM COLL 012308 COMM COLLEGE OF THE A.F. 008322 DEVRY UNIVERSITY 001015 ENTERPRISE STATE JR COLL 008246 DINE COLLEGE 001003 FAULKNER UNIVERSITY 008303 GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 005699 G.WALLACE ST CC-SELMA 001076 GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLL 001017 GADSDEN STATE COMM COLL 001074 GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY 001019 HUNTINGDON COLLEGE 001077 MESA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 001020 JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIV 011864 MOHAVE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 001021 JEFFERSON DAVIS COMM COLL 001082 NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIV 001022 JEFFERSON STATE COMM COLL 011862 NORTHLAND PIONEER COLLEGE 001023 JUDSON COLLEGE 026236 PARADISE VALLEY COMM COLL 001059 LAWSON STATE COMM COLLEGE 001078 PHOENIX COLLEGE 001026 MARION MILITARY INSTITUTE 007266 PIMA COUNTY COMMUNITY COL 001028 MILES COLLEGE 020653 PRESCOTT COLLEGE 001031 NORTHEAST ALABAMA COMM CO 021775 RIO SALADO COMMUNITY COLL 005697 NORTHWEST
  • College/University Visit Clusters

    College/University Visit Clusters

    COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY VISIT CLUSTERS The groupings of colleges and universities below are by no means exhaustive; these ideas are meant to serve as good starting points when beginning a college search. Happy travels! BOSTON/RHODE ISLAND AREA Large: Boston University University of Massachusetts at Boston Northeastern University Medium: Bentley University (business focus) Boston College Brandeis University Brown University Bryant College (business focus) Harvard University Massachusetts Institute of Technology Providence College University of Massachusetts at Lowell University of Rhode Island Suffolk University Small: Babson College (business focus) Emerson College Olin College Rhode Island School of Design (art school) Salve Regina University Simmons College (all women) Tufts University Wellesley College (all women) Wheaton College CENTRAL/WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS Large: University of Massachusetts at Amherst/Lowell Medium: College of the Holy Cross Worcester Polytechnic Institute Small: Amherst College Clark University Hampshire College Mount Holyoke College (all women) Smith College (all women) Westfield State University Williams College CONNECTICUT Large: University of Connecticut Medium: Fairfield University Quinnipiac University Yale University Small: Connecticut College Trinity College Wesleyan University NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND Large: University of New Hampshire University of Vermont Medium: Dartmouth College Middlebury College Small: Bates College Bennington College Bowdoin College Colby College College of the Atlantic Saint Anselm College
  • Using Institutional Characteristics to Estimate Return on College Education

    Using Institutional Characteristics to Estimate Return on College Education

    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2018 Using Institutional Characteristics to Estimate Return on College Education Nate Choukas Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Econometrics Commons Recommended Citation Choukas, Nate, "Using Institutional Characteristics to Estimate Return on College Education". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2018. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/710 Running Head: ESTIMATING RETURN ON COLLEGE EDUCATION Using Institutional Characteristics to Estimate Return on College Education Nathaniel R. Choukas Trinity College ESTIMATING RETURN ON COLLEGE EDUCATION 2 Abstract Since the 1980s, the college wage-premium in the United States has reached all time highs. As a result, college education is a critical benchmark in securing high paying jobs. While the bachelor’s degree serves as a gateway into more lucrative careers, postsecondary education can be very costly, with some taking on substantial amounts of debt to finance their schooling. Despite the increasing wage-premium, there is an even wider earnings disparity amongst college graduates than between graduates and non-graduates. Research on higher education returns suggests that most individuals – even those ranked as having low ability – benefit financially from their investment in education. At the institutional level; however, some schools produce median returns on investment that are well below zero. This begs the question, why are a considerable number of the nation’s higher education institutions underserving their students? I use OLS to test the hypothesis that schools in rural settings displaced from major cities, and with religious affiliation will be critical variables in explaining college return on investment.
  • Swarthmore College Athletics Department

    Swarthmore College Athletics Department

    Swarthmore College Department of Athletics, Physical Education & Recreation Student-Athlete Manual A reference guide of policies and procedures for Swarthmore College Intercollegiate Athletes [1] Table of Contents GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE Department Directory 2 Other Important Numbers 3 Coaches’ Directory 3 Introduction 4 Sports Sponsorship 5 Conference Affiliations 5 MISSION & PHILOSOPHY Mission Statement 6 NCAA DIII Philosophy Statement 7-8 Advisory Committee 9 Multi-Sport Participation 9 Post Season Participation 9 CONDUCT & POLICIES Student Athlete Expectations & Social Media 10 Sexual Misconduct Policy 13 Hazing Policy 14 Drug and Alcohol Policy 14 Uniforms and Equipment 15 Academic Eligibility and Financial Aid 15 Scheduling Conflicts 16 Team Travel Policy 16 Grievance Policy 17 Dismissal from Athletic Teams 17 NCAA Regulations 17 SUPPORT SERVICES Athletic Communications 18 Sports Medicine 18-19 Student Athlete Advisory Committee 19 Overnight Host Policy 19 Strength & Conditioning 19 Academic Support Services 20 APPENDIXES A. Guidelines on Academic Conflicts B. NCAA Student Athlete Statement C. NCAA Summary of Regulations D. NCAA Drug Testing Consent E. NCAA Banned Drugs List F. HIPPA/Buckley Consent Form G. Permission to Contact/Self-Release H. SAAC Constitution [1] [2] Directory ADMINSTARTION & SERVICES Name & Position Email (@swarthmore.edu) Extension (610/ 328-xxxx) Sharon Green sgreen1 8218 Administrative Assistant Marian Fahy mfahy1 8213 Administrative Assistant Adam Hertz Marian Ware Director of Athletics, ahertz1 8325 Physical
  • Opening Set for 2002 Uring the May Lumni Memorial D18 Trustee-Fac- Gymnasium Is Ulty Dinner, Alan W

    Opening Set for 2002 Uring the May Lumni Memorial D18 Trustee-Fac- Gymnasium Is Ulty Dinner, Alan W

    Psychology_2001.qxd 5/9/03 2:13 PM Page 1 PSYCHOLOGY LAFAYETTE COLLEGE SUMMER 2001 ■ Vol.6 CHILDS WINS JAMES P. CRAWFORD AWARD Opening Set for 2002 uring the May lumni Memorial D18 trustee-fac- Gymnasium is ulty dinner, Alan W. currently being Childs, associate transformed into professor, received the Aa state-of-the-art home for James P. Crawford Lafayette’s programs in psy- Award for his out- chology and neuroscience. standing ability in The new facility will pro- classroom instruction. vide 45,000 square feet of Childs is known for his ability space on five levels including to lead classroom discussions, par- teaching laboratories, faculty ticularly in his First-Year Seminar research laboratories, shared “Human Aggression and Social faculty- student research lab- Pathology,” and his Values and oratories, and faculty offices. Science/Technology Seminar “Patient- Completion is expected to be Practitioner Interaction: The Role of sometime in 2002. Medical Technology,” noted Provost Members of the depart- June Schlueter in her remarks. ment were involved in “It was an honor to have been reviewing the plans and given an award named after some- meeting with the architects one whose career at the college I as the space was designed. have greatly admired,” says Childs. They provided advice based In a department of excellent teach- on experience in the current An architectural rendering of psychology’s new home. ers, it is a little embarrassing to be location and on exploring singled out in this way, and I think psychology facilities at other colleges. Some features include an animal of it as a compliment to the depart- research area on the lower level, common meeting spaces off the entryway ment as much as to me.
  • 2009-2010 (Pdf)

    2009-2010 (Pdf)

    MUHLENBERG C O L L E G E Source Book 2009-2010 Source Book 2009-2010 • Edited By: Nicole Hammel • Director, Institutional Research & Records • Published October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2009-2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE COLLEGE 4 I. Description 4 1. A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE COLLEGE ............................................................................................. 4 2. MISSION STATEMENT OF THE COLLEGE ...............................................................................................5 3. DIVERSITY STATEMENT OF THE COLLEGE…………………………………………………………...5 4. THE YEAR IN REVIEW, 2008-2009 ............................................................................................................. 6 5. CENTERS AND INSTITUTES .................................................................................................................... .7 6. PROGRAMS OF STUDY ............................................................................................................................. .8 7. SPECIAL ACADEMIC PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 9 8. DEPARTMENTAL MAJOR PROGRAMS ...................................................................................................11 9. THE WESCOE SCHOOL OF MUHLENBERG COLLEGE......………………………………………….. 15 II. Facilities 16 1. MAJOR FACILITIES ....................................................................................................................................16 2. MUHLENBERG COLLEGE PROPERTIES
  • Lafayette College Climate Action Plan 2.0

    Lafayette College Climate Action Plan 2.0

    Lafayette College Climate Action Plan 2.0 Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary 4 I. Vision 8 II. Progress to Date 9 A. Climate Action Plan 1.0 Accomplishments 9 1. We measured emissions and energy. 2. We reduced emissions. 3. We conserved energy. B. Additional Achievements 12 1. We introduced composting to campus. 2. We established LaFarm. 3. We built sustainably. 4. We minimized waste and expanded reuse and recycling. 5. We improved transportation. 6. We reinforced the College’s commitment to sustainability. II. Climate Action Plan 2.0 18 A. Buildings and Facilities Energy Use 19 1. Recommendations 2. Timeline a) Phase 1: Immediate Opportunities for 2019-2020 b) Phase 2: Recommendations for 2021-2025 c) Phase 3: Recommendations for 2026-2035 B. Minimize Waste 26 1. Recommendations 2. Timeline a) Phase 1: Immediate Opportunities for 2019-2020 b) Phase 2: Recommendations for 2021-2025 c) Phase 3: Recommendations for 2026-2035 C. Transportation 29 1. Recommendations 2. Timeline a) Phase 1: Immediate Opportunities for 2019-2020 b) Phase 2: Recommendations for 2021-2025 c) Phase 3: Recommendations for 2026-2035 D. Curricular Integration 32 1. Accomplishments 2. Goals IV. Conclusion and Next Steps 37 V. References 38 1 Acknowledgements Lafayette College’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) is the result of a collaborative process, in which faculty, staff, and students were actively involved and enthusiastically engaged. Committee members attended meetings throughout spring semester 2018 and provided ongoing feedback as the plan was drafted. We appreciate their commitment to helping create this comprehensive plan. We also are grateful to faculty and students in Economics 408 and Engineering Studies 451 who contributed research and recommendations through their capstone projects.