Unit 11 Chalcolithic and Early Iron Age -11

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unit 11 Chalcolithic and Early Iron Age -11 UNIT 11 CHALCOLITHIC AND EARLY IRON AGE -11 Structure 11.0 Objectives 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Early Farming Settlements 11.2.1 Cultural Phases 11.2.2 Subsistence Economy 11.2.3 Material Culture 11.2.4 Burial Practices 11.3 Neolithic Surface Finds 11.4 Iron Age in South India 11.4.1 Megalithic Cultures 11.4.2 Origins of the Megalithic Cultures 11.4.3 Material Culture 11.4.4 Subsistence Economy 11.5 Letussumup 11.6 Keywords 11.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises This unit deals with the early farming communities and the subsequent Iron Age in the region of South India. After reading this unit, you will be able to know about: the successive phases of the early farming culture of southern India and their salient features, the nature of settlements, economy and other traits of these cultures, and the characteristic features of the Early Iron Age in this region. 11.1 INTRODUCTION By now you mwt be well familiar with the evolution of human beings hm hunter-gatherers into settled agricultural wmmunltia, You have also learnt about the &tence of the Harappan Civilhation and the various upectn relatgd to it. In the preview unit you have wnn how different cultura emerged ibllowing the decline of the HBtBppan CivUiaation, covering the time span from the mdmillannilun B.C. to flrst millennium B.C. In this' unit, we will review the developments in south India during the same period. The focus of the eNdy will be on the nature of the change8 that came about in thie period in material culture, in settlement patterns and social organisation. 11.2 EARLY FARMING SETIZEMENTS Settlements of the early farming communities in south India make a rather sudden appearance in the third millennium B.C. There is no evidence to discem a gradual evolution (as in West Asii) from a hunting-gathering economy to a food producing economy. The evidence for this region indicates some sort of colonization of favourable habitats in the Godavari, Krishna, Tungabhadra, Penneru and Kaveri river systems. These settlements, in majority of the cases, are scattered in the semi-arid, low rain fall and sandy loamy regions which are suitable for dry farming and pastoralism (cattle, sheep and goat). The distinguishing features of these settlements are: i) Sedentary village settlements with semi-permanent to permanent structures, the latter consisting of wattle and daub. ii) Stone axes (made of Bard rocks like dolerite and basalt) manufactured by grinding and polishing. Because of this technique the stone tool industry of these early farming cultures is referred to as the polished stone axe industry. iii) Long and thin blades made of hegrained rocks like chert, jasper, chalcedony and agate. These artefacts have a sheen on the cutting edge, indicating that they were used for harvesting crops. iv) Pottery which is hand made in the early stages and wheel made ih the later stages. v) An economy based on millet farming, and cattle and sheep/goat pastoralism. The economy, thus, is basically ago-pastoral. vi) The dietary needs are supplemented by wild game. Important Neolithic-Chalcollthie sitee in South India 11.2.1 Cultural Phases c On the basis of the overall evidence, we can distinguish three broad phases in the growth of the early farming communities in south India. I Phase I: The earliest settlements of these farming communities represent this phase. I * These were made on tops of granitoid hills, or on levelled terraces on hill sides, or in 1 the valleys between two or more hills. The material culture consists of a polished stone axe industry, blade industry and handmade pottery. 1 In pottery, grey or buff-brown ware is most common. A ware, which is less common, has a black or red burnished slip, often with purple painted decorations. These earliest settlements are associated with ash mounds some of which were excavated. TI.,,, TI.,,, --,,.., 6-2 ,,L ,-..-A -:A^- 1:1_- T~L-__- v___--1 TI- >-l.-l n-11- -.a 1.. I Evolotlon of Euly hd&n Maski and Brahmagiri have all revealed the first phase of settlements of these Sodely: 2400 B.C. to can 1000 B.C. agro-pastoral communities. This phase be ascribed between 2500-1800 B.C. on the basis of radiocarbon dates. Phase II: The settlement pattern of Phase-I continues without any change: settlements were still made on top of granitic hills, or on levelled surfaces on the hillsides. Nonetheless, there are some important developments. The settlements had circular hutments of wattle and daub on wooden frames with mud floors. SomC of the larger pits at Naga rjuna-Konda (in coastal Andhradesa) which are circular, oval, oblong and irregular, with post holes are interpreted as semi-subterranean pit dwellings. Pit dwellings were also found at Paiyampalli and Veerapuram. In this phase new pottery types like the perforated and spouted vessels appeared. The discovery of such pottery types reveals contacts with regions in the north as similar pottery types have been found there. The technique of roughening the outer surface of pottery during this phase is reminiscent of technique employed in the early Harappan period. The polished stone axe and Made industries proliferated in this phase. Copper and bronze objects were also discovered for the first time and their numbers increased towards the end of this phase. Some of the sites where the Phase-I1 settlements were discovered are Piklihal, Brahmagiri, Sanganakallu, Tekkalakota, Hallur and T. Narsipur. The available radiocarbon dates for this phase suggest a timespan covering 1800-1500 B.C. Phase III: The important development in this phase is the increase in the number of copper and bronze tools. Such an increase is seen at Tekkalakota, Hallur, Piklihal, Sanganakallu, Brahmagiri and Paiyampalli. The stone axe and blade industries continue. In pottery a new grey and buff ware with a harder surface becomes common. Another ceramic type which is wheel made, unburnished and with purple paint also appears. This ware has affinities to the chalcolithic Jorwe ware of Maharashtra. On these grounds this phase can be ascribed to the period 1400-1050 B.C. 1 These three phases reveal how gradually the early farming-cum-pastoral settlements in south India emerged and expanded. There is continuity of occupation from Phase I to Phase 111 (as revealed at some sites in the excavations) and with no significant change in the economy. The only important difference is the absence of copper/bronze tools in Phase I. As the occupation of Pham I1 and I11 have yielded these metal tools, they are designated as Neolithic-Chalcolithic. From the distribution of these settlements, it can be seen that the preferred landforms' are low hill ranges away from major watersheds but in proximity to streams; the soil zones are tropical black clays, tropical red and black sandy loams, sandy or sandy loamy fermginous tropical soils, and deltaic alluvium. The average annual rainfall in which these settlements are located, as at present, falls in the range of 600-1200 mrn. , These sites are commonly dispersed in the castlellated hills and the habitations are usually on the tops of hills or at the foot of hills. 11.2.2 Subsistence Economy In view of the location of the sites in relation to physiography, it would appear that areas which were suited largely for gravity flow irrigation were generally colonised. However, there are some sites like Veerapuram on the bank of Krishna, Hahon r the Tungabhadra, T. Narsipur at the codhence of the Kaveri and Kapila and those in the alluvial zones of the Krishna, where there is scope for water management through canal irrigation. The available archaeobotanical evidenc~,indicates that millets and pulses were the main cultivated crops. These are various kinds of millet, horse gram, green gram and . 4 black gram. Hyacinth bean and barley have been recently identified at Ramapuram. Coming to the fauna, almost all the excavated Neolithic-Chalcolithic sites yielded remains which belong to both domesticated and wild species. The domesticated species consist of cattle, buffalo, sheep, goat, pig, dog and fowl. Cattle predominate at the majority of the sites indicating its importance in the economy of these communities. For instance in the Neolithic levels at Veerapuram, the faunal remains of which were subjected to meticulous study, cattle represent 48.68% of the domesticated animals whereas sheep/goat form only 5.4.9'0. If such was the case at Veerapuram situated on the right bank of the Krishna with potential for irrigation agriculture, then one should expect cattle pastoralism to have played a major role in the scores of sites located in the uplands. As the economy of these communities was a combination of agriculture and &al husbandry (cattle predominantly and sheep/goat to some extent), it can be termed agro-pastoral. In addition to these domesticated species these settlements have also yielded remains of wild game.These wild species are porcupine, black naped hare, nilgai, chinkara, blackbuck, sarnbar and chital. This would indicate that their meat requirements were supplemented by wild game. 11.2.3 Material Culture The material remains of this period include pottery, stone artefacts, copper/bronze object and other objects. i) Pottery Pottery in Phase I (2500-1800 B.C.) was predominantly handmade, grey or buff-brown. This grey ware is characterized by the use of bands of red ochre, applied after firing. What is interesting is that some of these pottery forms have applied ring feet and hollow pedestals which recall the pre-Harrappan types known from Amri and Kalibangan. The other ceramic type of Phase I had a black or red burnished slip, with a purple painted decoration.
Recommended publications
  • The Story of Millets
    The Story of Millets Millets were the first crops Millets are the future crops Published by: Karnataka State Department of Agriculture, Bengaluru, India with ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad, India This document is for educational and awareness purpose only and not for profit or business publicity purposes 2018 Compiled and edited by: B Venkatesh Bhat, B Dayakar Rao and Vilas A Tonapi ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad Inputs from: Prabhakar, B.Boraiah and Prabhu C. Ganiger (All Indian Coordinated Research Project on Small Millets, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India) Disclaimer The document is a compilation of information from reputed and some popular sources for educational purposes only. The authors do not claim ownership or credit for any content which may be a part of copyrighted material or otherwise. In many cases the sources of content have not been quoted for the sake of lucid reading for educational purposes, but that does not imply authors have claim to the same. Sources of illustrations and photographs have been cited where available and authors do not claim credit for any of the copy righted or third party material. G. Sathish, IFS, Commissioner for Agriculture, Department of Agriculture Government of Karnataka Foreword Millets are the ancient crops of the mankind and are important for rainfed agriculture. They are nutritionally rich and provide number of health benefits to the consumers. With Karnataka being a leading state in millets production and promotion, the government is keen on supporting the farmers and consumers to realize the full potential of these crops. On the occasion of International Organics and Millets Fair, 2018, we are planning before you a story on millets to provide a complete historic global perspective of journey of millets, their health benefits, utilization, current status and future prospects, in association with our knowledge partner ICAR - Indian Institute of Millets Research, with specific inputs from the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeobotany of Khao Sam Kaeo and Phu Khao Thong: the Agriculture of Late Prehistoric Southern Thailand (Volume 1)
    The Archaeobotany of Khao Sam Kaeo and Phu Khao Thong: The Agriculture of Late Prehistoric Southern Thailand (Volume 1) Cristina Castillo Institute of Archaeology University College London Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of University College London 2013 Declaration I hereby declare that this dissertation consists of original work undertaken by the undersigned. Where other sources of information have been used, they have been acknowledged. Cristina Castillo October 2013 Institute of Archaeology, UCL 2 Abstract The Thai-Malay Peninsula lies at the heart of Southeast Asia. Geographically, the narrowest point is forty kilometres and forms a barrier against straightforward navigation from the Indian Ocean to the South China Sea and vice versa. This would have either led vessels to cabotage the southernmost part of the peninsula or portage across the peninsula to avoid circumnavigating. The peninsula made easy crossing points strategic locations commercially and politically. Early movements of people along exchange routes would have required areas for rest, ports, repair of boats and replenishment of goods. These feeder stations may have grown to become entrepôts and urban centres. This study investigates the archaeobotany of two sites in the Thai-Malay Peninsula, Khao Sam Kaeo and Phu Khao Thong. Khao Sam Kaeo is located on the east whereas Phu Khao Thong lies on the west of the peninsula and both date to the Late Prehistoric period (ca. 400-100 BC). Khao Sam Kaeo has been identified as the earliest urban site from the Late Prehistoric period in Southeast Asia engaged in trans-Asiatic exchange networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Stability of Early Iron Age Folks of South India with Special Reference to Krishna-Tungabhadra- Kaveri, Karnataka; Their Past-Present-Future
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Christ University Bengaluru: Open Journal Systems Artha J Soc Sci, 13, 4 (2014), 47-62 ISSN 0975-329X|doi.org/10.12724/ajss.31.4 Understanding the Stability of Early Iron Age folks of South India with Special Reference to Krishna-Tungabhadra- Kaveri, Karnataka; Their Past-Present-Future Arjun R* Abstract There are about 1933 Early Iron Age Megalithic sites spread across South India. The Early Iron Age of South India is implicit either in the form of burial sites, habitation sites, habitation cum burial sites, Iron Age rock art sites, and isolated iron smelting localities near a habitation or burials. This paper is an attempt to take a rough computation of the potentiality of the labour, technology and quantity of artifact output that this cultural phase might have once had, in micro or in macro level. Considering the emergence of technology and its enormous output in Ceramics, Agriculture, Metallurgy and Building up Burials as industries by themselves, that has economic, ethnographic and socio-technique archaeological imprints. This helps in understanding two aspects: one, whether they were nomadic, semi settled or settled at one location; two, the Diffusion versus Indigenous development. A continuity of late Neolithic phase is seen into Early Iron Age and amalgamation of Early Iron Age with the Early Historic Period as evident in the sites like Maski, Brahmagiri, Sanganakallu, Tekkalakota, T-Narasipur. In few cases, Iron Age folks migrated from one location to the other and settled on the river banks in large scale like that in Hallur and Koppa.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Geographical Setting and Pre-Historic Cultures of India
    MODULE - 1 Ancient India 2 Notes THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING AND PRE-HISTORIC CULTURES OF INDIA The history of any country or region cannot be understood without some knowledge of its geography. The history of the people is greatly conditioned by the geography and environment of the region in which they live. The physical geography and envi- ronmental conditions of a region include climate, soil types, water resources and other topographical features. These determine the settlement pattern, population spread, food products, human behaviour and dietary habits of a region. The Indian subcontinent is gifted with different regions with their distinct geographical features which have greatly affected the course of its history. Geographically speaking the Indian subcontinent in ancient times included the present day India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Pakistan. On the basis of geographical diversities the subcontinent can be broadly divided into the follow- ing main regions. These are: (i) The Himalayas (ii) The River Plains of North India (iii) The Peninsular India OBJECTIVES After studying this lesson, you will be able to: explain the physical divisions of Indian subcontinent; recognize the distinct features of each region; understand why some geographical areas are more important than the others; define the term environment; establish the relationship between geographical features and the historical devel- opments in different regions; define the terms prehistory, prehistoric cultures, and microliths; distinguish between the lower, middle and upper Palaeolithic age on the basis of the tools used; explain the Mesolithic age as a phase of transition on the basis of climate and the 10 HISTORY The Geographical Setting and pre-historic MODULE - 1 Ancient India tools used; explain the Neolithic age and its chief characteristics; differentiate between Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods and learn about the Prehistoric Art.
    [Show full text]
  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER History
    PARIPEX - INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH VOLUME-6 | ISSUE-7 | JULY-2017 | ISSN - 2250-1991 | IF : 5.761 | IC Value : 79.96 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER History Understanding the Evolution of Southern KEY WORDS: Society- Neolithic Society Archaeology- Neolithic- South India Avantika Sharma University of Delhi Contemporaneous to Indus Civilization, the southern Neolithic Culture dominated south India from 3000 BCE to 1400 BCE. This vast timeline was further divided into three phases by Allchins. In their opinion, the three phases saw a transition from a predominantly pastoral society to a settled agricultural one. In this paper, we revisit the three phases and attempt to understand the development of society in each phase. For this purpose, we rely on anthropological concepts of band, tribes, chiefdom and state. ABSTRACT 1.1 Introduction: 1.2 Phase I The period between 3000 BCE to 1400 BCE, the southern From stratigraphy and radiocarbon dates available, we can infer landscape was dominated by Neolithic culture. The significance that the earliest settlements involved founding of ashmound sites of the Neolithic phase was first diagnosed by Gordon Childe,1 who like Utnur, Piklihal, Kupgal, Kodekal, Kudatini, and Watgal. In the saw it as nothing less than a revolution. The most important recent years, Fuller and his team have sub-divided the phase into a changes of this phase were animal and plant domestication. It has non-ashmound phase (IA) and ashmound phase (IB).14 Sub-phase been argued that they created the economic base for surplus (IA) dated between 3000- 2500 BCE was discovered at Utnur, production from which further complex societies could emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Pattern and Study of Neolithic Sites in Andhradesa
    DISTRIBUTION PATTERN AND STUDY OF NEOLITHIC SITES IN ANDHRADESA MARUTHI CHANDRA CHEJARLA Research Scholar, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur (AP) INDIA In the cultural process of human being Neolithic culture is represented with many new inventions. Term Neolithic is for the first time coined by John Lubbock in 1865i. Term Neolithic means new stone age; this word is derived from two Greek words i.e Neo means New and Lithos means Stone. Neolithic period flourished in world in various phases at different times. INTRODUCTION For the first time V Gordon Childe propounded a new term Neolithic Revolution for Neolithic period since it is recorded with the emergence of agriculture practices in large scale in entire world. He mentioned that climatic and environmental changes are reason for the starting of cultivation and agricultural practices; as the world environment has changed from Pleistocene to Holocene. He used the term revolution to describe the changes took place in the social and economic sectors of human beings; with the wide spread practice of agriculture. Before going to discuss about the Neolithic culture of Andhra it is important to know common features of Neolithic culture in various regions of the world. Though there are regional differences in Neolithic cultural characteristics but some of the common features are there in all the regions. Most of the researchers and scholars accepted that wide range of changes took place in the lives of during Neolithic period. Domestication of animals and plants, incensement in the population, settled life, village system, potter’s wheel, economical and cultural interaction within the people, proper and suitable diet are some of the major innovations taken place during Neolithic phase of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Dispersal of Millet Cultivation in India
    Interregional Contacts in the Later Prehistory of Northeastem Africa Poznari 1996 Purushottam Singh The origin and dispersal of millet cultivation in India Millet is a group name of cereals known as coarse grains. They comprise plants belonging to different genera and species with widely varying habits and characters. Millets are warm-weather cereals with small grains and include six genera, i.e. Panicum miliaceum - Indian millet (Chesna, Sawan) and Panicum miliare - Little fox - tailed millet, Echinochloa - Barnyard millet, Pennisetum typhoies - Pearl millet, Paspalum scrobiculatum L. - Kodo millet, Eleusine cora- cana - Ragi (African millet), Sorghum vulgare - Great millet (Jowar). Archaeobotanical studies of plant and grain remains obtained from ar- chaeological sites during the past two decades have resulted in an almost con- tinuous history of millet cultivation in India. Various types of millets have been reported from the pre-Harappan culture at Rohira, the Late Harappan culture at Hulas in western Uttar Pradesh, in the same context at several sites in Guarajat (Rangpur, Surkodta, Rojdi) and in the Neolithic levels at Hallur (Karnataka), besides Pirak in Pakistan. These grains were grown in the Chalcolitihic culture at Ahar (south-eastern Rajasthan) and at Paunar in northern Maharasthra. The evidence from these sites is as follows: Evidence for the cultivation of jowar millet (Sorghum vulgare L.) at Rohira has been obtained from Period IA (pre-Harappan, ca. 2300-2000 B.C.) along with that of barley, wheat, lentil and horse gram (IAR, 1983-84:188). The Late Harappan crops at Hulas (district Saharanpur) comprised barley and several varieties of wheat and pulses. A single subglobos seed with vaguely rugose ornamentation was provisionally identified as ragi (Eleusine coracana) (IAR, 1982-83:149).
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Heritage in Karnataka with Particular Reference to Geographical Setting
    Trans.Inst.Indian Geographers ISSN 0970-9851 Archaeological heritage in Karnataka with particular reference to Geographical setting Hema Thakur, Bangalore. Abstract Karnataka has given extremely rich evidence for archaeological remains. The landscape of Karnataka seems to have been suitable for human habitation from the pre-historic through the proto-historic and historic period as evidence for all the three phases is available almost all over the state. In this paper the geographical landscape of Karnataka has been discussed. The drainage of Karnataka is based on three notable rivers - Krishna on the north, the Kaveri on the south, the two Pennars (North Pennar and South Pennar) and the Palar on the east. The drainage of Karnataka is mentioned as settlements from the neolithic period onwards are located close to the rivers and rivers played a crucial role in sustaining human habitation. Similarly, Karnataka enjoys the benefit of numerous mountain ranges. Mountains are a source of economically viable rocks and minerals. There is evidence for the exploitation of metals and minerals since prehistoric period. Other important geographical aspects which may have had a bearing on the historical development such as soil types, flora and fauna, climate, etc. have been examined. Key words: landscape, rivers, mountains, metals and minerals The discipline of archaeology is extremely culture complex in Karnataka were first relevant for the Deccan, especially Karnataka noticed by Col. Colin Mackenzie. They were as this region has a rich assemblage of explored, excavated and analysed by amateur antiquities ranging from pre-historic through archaeologists and other scholars, prominent the proto-historic to early historic period.
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, Bijapur, Part XII-B, Series-11
    CENSUS OF INDIA 1991 Series -11 KARNATAKA DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK BUAPUR DISTRICT PART XII-B VILLAGE AND TOWN WISE PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT SOBnA NAMBISAN­ Director of Census Operations, Kamataka CONTENTS Page No. FOREWORD V - VI PREFACE VII - VIII IMPORTANT STATISTICS IX - XII ANALYTICAL NOTE 1 - 39 PRIMARY CENsus ABSTRACT Explanatory Notes 43 - 46 A. District Primary Census Abstract 48 - 65 (i) Villageffown Primary Census Abstract Alphabetical List of Villages - Badami C.D.Block 69 - 72 Primary Ce::t~us Abstract - Badami C.D.Block 74 - 93 Alphabetical List of Villages - Bagalkot C.D.Block 97-99 Primary Census Abstract - Bagalkot C.D.Block 100 - 111 Alphabetical List of Villages - Basavana Bagevadi C.D.Block 115 - 117 Primary Census Abstract - Basavana Bagevadi C.D.Block 118 - 133 Alphabetical List of Villages - Bijapur C.D.Block 137 - 139 Primary Census Abstract - Bijapur C.D.Block 140 - 155 Alphabetical ~ist of Villages - Bilgi C.D.Block 159 - 160 Primary Census Abstract - Bilgi C.D.Block 162 - 173 Alphabetical List of Villages - Hungund C.O.Block 177 - 180 Primary Census Abstract - Hungund C.D.Block 182 - 201 Alphabetical List of Villages '" Jndi C.D.Block 205 - 208 Primary Census Abstract - Indi C.D.Block 210 - 225 Alphabetical List of Villages - Ja~khandi C.D.Block 229 - 230 Primary Census Abstract - Iamkhandi C.D.Block 232 - 243 Alphabetical List. of Villages - Muddebihal C.D.Block 247 - 250 Primary Census. Abstract . - Muddebihal C.D.Block 252 - 271 Alphabetical List of Villages - Mudhol C.D.Block • 275 - 277 Primary Census Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • Class 6 History Chapter 3 from Gathering to Growing Food
    Class 6 History Chapter 3 From Gathering to Growing Food 1. Why do people who grow crops have to stay in the same place for a long time? Answer : People who grow crops have to stay in the same place for a long time because they had to look after the crops. The plants had to be watered and had to be protected from birds and animals so that they could grow and the seeds would ripen. 2. Look at the table on page 25. If Neinuo wanted to eat rice, which are the places she should have visited? Answer : If Neinuo wanted to eat rice, she should have visited Koldihwa and Mahagara (both are in present-day Uttar Pradesh). 3. Why do archaeologists think that many people who lived in Mehrgarh were hunters to start with and that herding became more important later? Answer : Archaeologists think that many people who lived in Mehrgarh were hunters to start with and that herding became more important later because at earlier levels of the excavation site bones of wild animals such as the deer and pig were found but at later levels more bones of sheep, goat and cattle bones are most common. 4. State whether true or false: (a) Millets have been found at Hallur. ► True (b) People in Burzahom lived in rectangular houses. ► False (c) Chirand is a site in Kashmir. ► False (d) Jadeite, found in Daojali Hading, may have been brought from China. ► True 5. List three ways in which the lives of farmers and herders would have been different from that of hunter-gatherers.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Human Colonization of India
    Prehistoric human colonization of India V N MISRA G-2, B Wing, Ganga Park, Mundhwa Road, Pune 411 036, India (Email, [email protected]) Human colonization in India encompasses a span of at least half-a-million years and is divided into two broad periods, namely the prehistoric (before the emergence of writing) and the historic (after writing). The prehistoric period is divided into stone, bronze and iron ages. The stone age is further divided into palaeolithic, mesolithic and neolithic periods. As the name suggests, the technology in these periods was primarily based on stone. Economically, the palaeolithic and mesolithic periods represented a nomadic, hunting-gathering way of life, while the neolithic period represented a settled, food-producing way of life. Subsequently copper was introduced as a new material and this period was designated as the chalcolithic period. The invention of agriculture, which took place about 8000 years ago, brought about dramatic changes in the economy, technology and demography of human societies. Human habitat in the hunting-gathering stage was essentially on hilly, rocky and forested regions, which had ample wild plant and animal food resources. The introduction of agriculture saw it shifting to the alluvial plains which had fertile soil and perennial availability of water. Hills and forests, which had so far been areas of attraction, now turned into areas of isolation. Agriculture led to the emergence of villages and towns and brought with it the division of society into occupational groups. The first urbanization took place during the bronze age in the arid and semi-arid region of northwest India in the valleys of the Indus and the Saraswati rivers, the latter represented by the now dry Ghaggar–Hakra bed.
    [Show full text]
  • Finger Millet (Ragi, Eleusine Coracana L.): a Review of Its Nutritional Properties, Processing, and Plausible Health Benefits
    CHAPTER ONE Finger Millet (Ragi, Eleusine coracana L.): A Review of Its Nutritional Properties, Processing, and Plausible Health Benefits S. Shobana*, K. Krishnaswamy*,1, V. Sudha*, N.G. Malleshi*, R.M. Anjana*, L. Palaniappan†, V. Mohan* *Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, WHO Collaborating Centre for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Control, IDF Centre of Education, Gopalapuram, Chennai, India †Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA 1Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. History of Finger Millet 3 3. Millet Consumption in India 4 4. Nutritional Significance of Structural Features of Finger Millet 5 5. Nutrient Composition of Finger Millet 6 5.1 Carbohydrates 6 5.2 Proteins 6 5.3 Fat 10 5.4 Micronutrients 10 6. Phytonutrients/Phytochemicals 11 6.1 Phenolics compounds 11 7. Processing and Utilization 12 7.1 Milling 13 7.2 Decortication 13 7.3 Malting 15 7.4 Popping 15 8. Health Benefits of Finger Millet 17 9. In Vitro Studies on the Carbohydrate Digestibility of Finger Millet 26 10. Glycemic Response (GR) studies on Finger Millet (Human Studies) 28 11. Gaps in the Knowledge and Future Directions for Research 30 12. Conclusion 31 References 32 # Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, Volume 69 2013 Elsevier Inc. 1 ISSN 1043-4526 All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410540-9.00001-6 2 S. Shobana et al. Abstract Finger millet or ragi is one of the ancient millets in India (2300 BC), and this review focuses on its antiquity, consumption, nutrient composition, processing, and health benefits.
    [Show full text]