INFORMATION TO USERS
This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed.
The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction.
1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this.
2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap pears to indicate this.
3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format.*
4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format.*
*For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department.
T T A /T T Dissertation vJ l V l l Information Service
University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8626317
Houiti, Ahmed
INDUSTRIALIZATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF POST-INDEPENDENCE ALGERIA, 1962-1984
The American University Ph.D. 1986
University Microfilms
International 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106
Copyright 1985
by Houiti, Ahmed All Rights Reserved
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASE NOTE:
In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V .
1. Glossy photographs or pages______
2. Colored illustrations, paper or print______
3. Photographs with dark background_____
4. Illustrations aro poor copy ^
5. Pages with black marks, not original copy______
6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page______
7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages /
8. Print exceeds margin requirements______
9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine______
10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print______
11. Page(s)______lacking when material received, and not available from school or author.
12. Page(s)______seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows.
13. Two pages numbered . Text follows.
14. Curling and wrinkled pages______
15. Dissertation contains pages with print at a slant, filmed as received ^
16. Other______
University Microfilms International
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INDUSTRIALIZATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
THE EXPERIENCE OF POST-INDEPENDENCE ALGERIA
1962-1984
by
Ahmed Houiti
submitted to the
Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences
of The American University
in Partial Fulfillment of
The Requirements for the Degree
of
Doctor of Philosophy
in
Sociology
Signatures of Committee:
Chairman:
A/
Dean of the College 9 32* saamJqju- i
1985 The American University Washington, D.C. ?0016
THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © COPYRIGHT
BY
AHMED HOUITI
1985
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INDUSTRIALIZATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
THE EXPERIENCE OF POST INDEPENDENCE ALGERIA
1962-1984
by
Ahmed Houiti
ABSTRACT
This study deals with the problem of industrializa
tion and economic development in a Third World country,
Algeria. The main thesis of the study is that Algeria,
like most other Third World countries, is witnessing major
economic development and industrialization. Throughout
this process of industrialization Algeria is experiencing
dependent capitalist economic development. This thesis is
discussed through a detailed case study of the process of
industrialization and economic development over a period
of twenty-two years (1962-1984).
Moreover, the process of industrialization and econ
omic development is analyzed from a political economy
perspective and viewed within the international economic
order, whereby the major external political and economic
factors in shaping Algerian industrialization are dis
cussed .
ii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my sincere thanks to the members of
the committee for their general advice and counsel; spe
cial appreciation is further expressed to Chairman Dr.
Jurg Siegenthaler for his criticism, guidance, and encour
agement of the study from its outline stage to its comple
tion. Sincere gratitude is expressed to Dr. Esther N.
Chow for her constructive criticism, guidance and encour
agement throughout this investigation; sincere apprecia
tion also is due Dr. Ken Kusterer for his constant advice
and valuable guidance at various stages of the investiga
tion.
Acknowledgement is also due Dr. Khalid bin Sayeed,
Professor of Political Studies at Queen's University,
Canada, for his deep interest and critical review of this
study.
I am very grateful to Dr. Obouzar, Mr. Rouag at the
World Bank, and Dr. Labis M. Hassan, Advisor to the Execu
tive Director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
for their cooperation and assistance in obtaining the
necessary documents and reports for this research.
Finally, I am very thankful for my family for giving
me the necessary spiritual support throughout all these
iii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. years of study and research. Also, special thanks go to
the Algerian government and the Ministry of Higher Educa
tion (Ministere de 1'Enseignement et de la Recherche
Scientifique) for their material support which made this
work possible.
iv
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ...... ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... iii
LIST OF T A B L E S ...... viii
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS...... xii
I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1
Organization of the Study ...... 2 The Research Problem ...... 5 The Research Methodology ...... 11 Theoretical Framework ...... 13
II. GENERAL HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ...... 26
Algerian Social Formation under French Occupation, 1830-1962 ...... 28 Social, Economic and Political C o n d i t i o n s ...... 30 Agriculture...... 34 I n d u s t r y ...... 39 Birth of Nationalism and Political Struggle ...... 44
III. THE CHOICE OF THE ALGERIAN INDUSTRIAL MODEL AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES ...... 52
Ideological and Political Foundation.... 52 The Evian Agreement (March 1962) . . . . 53 The Tripoli Programme (June 1962).... 55 The March Decrees (March 1963) 57 The Algiers Charter (April 1964).... 62 Algerian Development Strategies ...... 67 Conclusion...... 77
IV. CONSTRUCTION OF THE POST-INDEPENDENCE ECONOMY ...... 78
The Period of Transition (1962-1966).... 78 The New Industrial Doctrine (1966-1969) 86
v
with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The Structure of Post-Independence E c o n o m y ...... 95 Private Sector ...... 97 Self-Management or Autogestion S e c t o r ...... 102 Public or State Sector ...... 109 Conclusion: The Algerian Social Class Structure...... 110
V. HYDROCARBONS INDUSTRIES ...... 115
Introduction ...... 115 The Strategic Importance of the Hydrocarbons Sector ...... 121 Oil I n d u s t r y ...... 130 Gas Industry ...... 143 Petrochemical Industries ...... 161 Conclusion...... 165
VI. HEAVY INDUSTRY ...... 169
Introduction ...... 169 Metallurgical Industries ...... 174 Mechanic Industries ...... 181 Construction Material Industries ...... 186 Mining Industries ...... 188 Electric Industries ...... 193 C o n c l u s i o n ...... 195
VII. LIGHT I N D U S T R Y ...... 199
Introduction ...... 199 Agro-alimentary Industries ...... 200 Textile Industries ...... 207 Tobacco Industries ...... 212 Paper and Wood Industries...... 213 Leather and Shoe Industries...... 217 Conclusion . 220
VIII. INDUSTRIALIZATION AND AGRICULTURE IN THE LIGHT OF DEVELOPMENT P L A N S ...... 222
Introduction ...... 222 Land and Climate Constraints...... 230 Human Resources ...... 230 Government Policy ...... 230 The First Three-Year Plan (1967-1969) . . . 238 The First Four-Year Plan (1970-1973) . . . 242 The Second Four-Year Plan (1974-1977) . . . 248 The First Five-Year Plan (1980-1984) . . . 253 C o n c l u s i o n ...... 272
vi
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. IX. ALGERIAN SOCIALISM AND FOREIGN DEPENDENCY...... 277
Introduction ...... 277 Technological and Scientific D e p e n d e n c y ...... 278 Algerian Development Strategies . . . .279 Technological Transfers Policy ...... 286 Effects of Technological Transfers . . . 293 Conclusion...... Foreign Capital Dependency ...... 297 Conclusion ...... 30P Foreign Skilled-Labor Dependency ...... 308 Educational and Training System . . . .312 Educational and Training Policies . . . 318 Conclusion...... 324 Algerian Socialism ...... 325 Deviation from Socialist Theory .... 332 Conclusion...... 336
X. OBSTACLES TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN A L G E R I A ...... 337
Population Growth ...... 338 M i g r a t i o n ...... 338 Land and Climate Constraints ...... 339 Mismanagement and Organization ...... 340 Underutilization of Technology ...... 342 Skilled Manpower ...... 342 Capital Shortage ...... 344 Underdeveloped Infrastructure ...... 344 Class Structure ...... 345
XI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 347
APPENDIX A. MAIN HYDROCARBONS INSTALLATIONS . . . .362
APPENDIX B. MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES AND THEIR DISTRIBUTIONS BY WILAYA AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS ...... 363
BIBLIOGRAPHY ...... 364
vii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF TABLES
1. Expansion of Vineyards and Wheat- Cultivated Land by Europeans ...... 36
2. Value of Exported Wine Production, by Thousands of French Francs ...... 36
3. Viniculture Expansion in Size and Production, 1921-1934 ...... 38
4. Movement of External Trade ...... 39
5. Workers, by Type of Industry, 1890 40
6. Jobs and Investment, 1958-1960 43
7. Approved Industrial Concerns, 1958-1960 .... 44
8. Investment for 1961 ...... 44
9. Employed, Unemployed and Active Population, 1966-77 73
10. Population Evolution ...... 75
11. Population Structure by Age G r o u p s ...... 76
12. Budget Revenues and Expenditures of 1963-1966 82
13. Employment and Underemployment in 1966 .... 83
14. Distribution of Industrial Investment, 1967-1969 ...... 89
15. Cultivable Land in 1964 ...... 98
16. Distribution of Privately-Owned Land by Size of H o l d i n g s ...... 99
17. Distribution of Privately Owned Land ...... 101
18. Proven Reserves of Crude O i l ...... 123
19. Proven Reserves of Natural G a s ...... 124
viii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 20. Oil and Gas Production, 1970-1978 125
21. National Production, Exports, and Consumption of Oil and Natural Gas, 1957-1979 127
22. Production of Oil by SONATRACH and Foreign Companies ...... 132
23. Evolution of Algerian Crude Oil Price .... 133
24. Crude and Refined Petroleum Products, 1973-1977 ...... 134
25. Algerian Oil Exports (Crude & Condensate) by Destination, 1972-1975 136
26. Exports and Domestic Consumption of Crude and Refined Petroleum Products, 1973-1977 ...... 137
27. Present Refining Capacity ...... 140
28. Algerian Exports of Various Oil Pr o d u c t s ...... 141
29. Production, Exports, and Domestic Consumption of Natural Gas, 1973-1977 .... 144
30. Algerian Exports of Natural Gas, 1973-1976 ...... 145
31. Major Algerian Gas Pipelines ...... 147
32. Algeria's Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) P l a n t s ...... 148
33. Liquified Natural Gas Plant Contractors . . . 150
34. Contracts of Gas Delivery to F r a n c e ...... 153
35. American LNG Contracts...... 156
36. Selected Petrochemical Production ...... 162
37. Production, Exports, and Domestic Consumption of Fertilizers, 1973-1977 .... 163
38. Output of Iron and Steel Products, 1973-1977 176
39. Main Metallurgical Production ...... 176
ix
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 40. Metallic Production ...... 178
41. Production of Cars and B u s e s ...... 182
42. Production of Tractors and Car Motors, 1974-1979 184
43. Major Products of Construction Material .... 189
44. Production and Exports of Minerals, 1973-1977 ...... 191
45. Output of Foodstuffs, Beverages and Tobacco Products, 1973-1977 ...... 201
46. Sugar Production ...... 203
47. Cereal Processing, 1963-1979 205
48. Production of Fat Matters ...... 206
49. Algerian Textile Products, 1966-1967 208
50. Textile Production, 1973-1977 ...... 212
51. Production of Paper and Boxes ...... 215
52. Output of Wood and Paper Products, 1973-1977 ...... 216
53. Output of Leather Products, 1973-1977 ...... 218
54. Shoe Production, 1970-1976 219
55. Percentage of Total Agricultural I n v e s t m e n t ...... 233
56. Investment by Sector and Year, 1970-1973 . . . 245
57. Development of National Consumption According to Rural and Urban Areas ...... 249
58. Investment by Sectors, 1974-77 251
59. Total Investment Allocations, 1980-84 ...... 255
60. Total Investment in Industry and Agriculture Throughout Development Plans . . . 256
61. Average Annual Amounts of Fixed I n v e s t m e n t ...... 259
62. LNG and Natural Gas Export Contracts ...... 260
x
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 63. Projected Imports of Selected Agricultural Commodities, 1985 ...... 264
64. Breakdown of Total Investment ...... 265
65. Algeria's Agricultural Imports, 1969-77 .... 269
66. Availability and Scarcity of Cadres in 1963 ...... 310
67. Deficit of Qualified Upper Level Cadres in the Industrial S e c t o r ...... 314
68. Deficit of Qualified Middle Level Cadres in the Industrial S e c t o r ...... 315
xi
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure
1. Organizational Structure of the Self-Management Sector ...... 108
2. Structure of Public Sector ...... 110
3. Algerian Social Class Structure ...... 113
4. Organizational Structure of SONATRACH ...... 118
Map
1. A l g e r i a ...... xiii
2. Main Hydrocarbons Installations ...... 362
3. Manufacturing by Wilaya and Public and Private S e c t o r s ...... 363
Graph
1. Trends in Hydrocarbons ...... 168
2. Trends in Manufacturing Production ...... 197
3. Foreign Dependency by Industrial Branches, 1974 198
4. General Investment Trend of Industry and Agriculture, 1967-84 275
5. Trends of Population and Agriculture ...... 276
xii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Algeria
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Socio-economic development in the Third World is not
only attracting widespread concern both nationally and
internationally, but it has become a main concern of
sociologists, economists, and political scientists during
the last three decades. The main question centers around
how to bring about an improvement in the quality of life
of underdeveloped countries through economic, social, and
political changes. Both economists and political scien
tists will find this study important as far as indus
trialization and economic development are concerned.
There are many societies in the Third World today at
various stages of development, attempting to become indus
trialized nations, and many of the major social, economic,
and political problems in these countries revolve around
the issue of industrialization. Therefore, the question
of industrialization in the Third World is worthy of
investigation, and the findings of this study will be
particularly significant for sociologists and students of
sociology who are interested in industrialization and
social change in developing countries.
1
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2
I have chosen Algeria as a case study simply because
I had the opportunity to live in that country and observe
closely its rapid development and social change during the
last twenty years. Most studies of Algeria in the field
of economic development and industrialization were carried
out by foreigners as a result of short visits to the
country. The importance of this study can be seen in
terms of its contribution to Marxist underdevelopment
theory, as an attempt to provide a better understanding of
a specific former colonial social formation in the context
of the Third World as well as in the international set
ting. Finally, it is hoped that the findings of this
research will be helpful to the Algerian government and
its economic institutions for carrying out its development
plans in the future.
Organization of the Study
In the first chapter, we will present the introduc
tion to the topic as well as the research questions to be
investigated throughout this study. Also, we will define
the concepts used in this research, such as economic
development, industrialization, and Third World. We will
present the main theoretical schools of development and
industrialization such as the Marxist school, the depen
dency school, the non-capitalist school and the "industri
alizing industries" theory. In addition, we shall develop
an appropriate theoretical framework in which the Algerian
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3
social formation may be studied with reference to these
different perspectives.
In the second chapter, we will provide a general
historical review for the study, concentrating on the
situation of agriculture and industry during the French
colonial period, 1830-1962. The nature of class conflict
that led to the Algerian revolution in 1954, and indepen
dence in 1962, will be analyzed. Finally, the French
development plan, the so-called Constantine Plan, 1959-
1964, and the major problems that Algerian industry inher
ited from the colonial order will be discussed.
In the third chapter, we shall present the problemat
ic choice of the socio-economic development strategy of
post-independence Algeria. More specifically, we will
discuss the ideological and political foundation of a
socialist choice by referring to the Evian Agreements of
March 1962, the Tripoli Programme of June 1962, the March
decrees of 1963, and the Algiers Charter of April 1964.
We will also discuss the Algerian economic development
strategy in general and industrialization policy in par
ticular.
In the fourth chapter, we will describe the structure
of post-independence economy, providing a brief descrip
tion of the period of economic transition and the new
industrial doctrine. A brief comparison between private,
public, and state sectors will be made.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4
In the fifth chapter, we will provide a comparative
and quantitative analysis of the three main branches of
the hydrocarbons industrial sector: the oil industry, the
gas industry, and the petrochemical industries.
In the sixth chapter, we will provide comparative and
quantitative analyses of the five main branches of the
heavy industrial sector: metallurgical industries, mech
anic industries, construction material industries,, mining
industries and electric industries.
In the seventh chapter, we will discuss the five
major branches of the light industrial sector: agro-
alimentary industries, textile industries, tobacco indus
tries, paper and wood industries, and leather and shoe
industries.
In the eighth chapter, we will examine, through
comparative and quantitative analysis, agriculture and
industrialization in the light of development plans.
These plans include the three-year plan, 1967-1969; the
first and second four-year plans, 1970-1973 and 1974-1977,
respectively; and Algeria's first five-year plan, 1980-
1984. We will also examine how the priority given to
industrialization at the expense of agriculture has
resulted in an uneven development.
In the ninth chapter, we will explore the problem of
foreign dependency and see how industrialization in
Algeria is financed. At the same time, we will explain
the contradiction between establishing socialism and the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5
participation of foreign capital in financing development,
and how this participation may lead to dependent develop
ment. Foreign skilled labor, technology and science will
be treated as variables of the dependency relationship
that links Algeria to the international economic setting.
In addition, we will attempt to trace the type of social
ism Algeria is adopting at this stage of economic and
industrial development.
In the tenth chapter, we will try to identify the
fundamental problems inherited from French colonialism and
those created by the process of industrialization and
economic development itself throughout the course of
application.
In the eleventh and last chapter, we will present our
conclusion as a result of the analysis presented in the
study. Some recommendations based on the above conclu
sions will also be provided.
The Research Problem
The focus of this study is the process of industrial
ization and economic development by a Third World country,
Algeria. It is a study of social change and transition
from a colonial capitalist social formation to a dependent
capitalist nation in the near future. Accordingly, the
research problem of this study centers around the follow
ing questions:
1. Can economic development in Algeria be inter preted as dependent development?
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6
2. Is there any contradiction between establishing socialism and the participation of foreign capital in financing the development?
3. Is dependent development avoidable if indus trialization occurs with the aid of foreign capital?
The main thesis is that Algeria, like other Third
World countries, is witnessing major economic development
and industrialization and that, throughout this process of
industrialization, Algeria is experiencing dependent
capitalist economic development.
To arrive at a sociological interpretation of econom
ic development and industrialization, it is necessary to
begin by providing the various definitions that will be
used in this research. To begin with, the term "economic
development" in this study is used to refer to the type of
social change described by Paul Baran: "Economic develop
ment has historically always meant a far-reaching trans
formation of society in economic, social, and political
structures."*
This study will be guided by the following two defi
nitions of development. First, M. Todaro gives the fol
lowing definition:
Development must...be conceived of as a multi dimensional process involving major changes in social structures, popular attitudes, and national institutions, as well as the accelera tion of economic growth, the reduction of
^Paul Baran, The Political Economy of Growth (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1957), p. 3.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 7
inequality, and the eradication of absolute poverty.
Second, the Algerian Charter of 1976 presented the concept
of economic development that was originally expressed in
both the Algiers Charter of 1964 and the Tripoli Programme
of 1962. The Charter defines economic development as
...the establishment of new and just socio economic structures, the recovery of natural riches and their exploitation, the rising up of the intellectual and political level of the masses, a substantial collective savings [sic], a strict planning of^of priorities, and equal division of revenues.
The reason for limiting ourselves to economic development
in general and industrialization in particular is simply
that economic development is the overriding priority among
the goals of government policies in the developing coun
tries, and industrialization is seen as the necessary
means for achieving economic development.
As far as industrialization is concerned, we adopt
the concept of industrialization in the sense that M.F.
Perroux has defined it:
A structuring of society by employing machinery in order to increase accumulatively and with decreasing individual effort, the power of human groups in obtaining the goods which are essen tial to their well-being. Industrialization is then the establishment of the process which consists of producing machines by using machines,
2 Michael Todaro, Economic Development in the Third World (New York: Longmans, 1977), p. 62. 3 John R. Nellis, The Algerian National Charter of 1976 (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University, 1980), p. 10.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8
such that the number of mechanical devices increases at an increasing rate and correlative- ly leads to a decrease in individual physical effort, therefore, a greater liberation of man from £he negative impact of the natural environ ment.
The term "non-capitalist development" in this study
will be used in the sense of V.G. Solodovnikov's defini
tion. Solodovnikov, director of the African Institute of
the USSR, sees the social system that most closely corres
ponds to objective conditions in the African countries as
...a system directing the development of society towards socialism, by-passing or terminating capitalism. Economically, backward countries of the African continent will require a whole transition epoch — one in which material and technological, social and political conditions will be created for the victory of socialism. Marxist-Leninists call Jbhat epoch one of non capitalist development.
Thus, according to him, non-capitalist development is a
transitional stage and a road of struggle for socialism in
countries where the proletariat has not yet become a
decisive force. By the same token, Yuri Popov argues
that "...both domestic and international conditions favour
the struggle of the newly free nations for the non-
4 Aissa Bennamane, The Algerian Development Strategy and Employment Policy (London: Geo-Abstracts, 1980), pp. 66-67. 5 V.G. Solodovnikov, "The Non-Capitalist Road of Development in Africa," in Marxism Today 13 (September 1969): 278.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9
capitalist, and then the socialist road of social and
economic development.
By "dependent development" we mean a situation in
which the economy of a developing country is dependent on
capitalist countries in the major spheres of economic
life; the process of development and industrialization is
linked directly to the capitalist mechanism of imperialist
countries and their own international and national needs.
In other words, the economy of a developing country be
comes integrated and geared primarily to the demands of
the world market through patterns of trade, investment,
technology, capital, and large-scale recruitment of for
eign specialists. As Dos Santos puts it (and I think
Samir Amin, Andre G. Frank, and Celso Furtado would agree),
it is "a situation in which the economy of certain coun
tries is conditioned by the development and expansion of 7 another economy to which the former is subjected."
The term "Third World" or "developing countries"
includes
...countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, mostly former colonies or semi-colonies. In the course of national liberation struggle the developing countries have attained political sovereignty, but being in the orbit of the world capitalist economy they remain to various extent unequal "partners of highly-developed capitalist
6Yuri Popov, Marxist Political Economy as Applied to the African Scene (Moscow: Novosti Press Agency, 1973) , p. 105.
^heotonio Dos Santos, "The Structure of Dependence," American Economic Review 60 (May 1970) : 231.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. lu
states. The developing countries include coun tries which...won political independence as a result of the collapse of the colonial system of imperialism after the Second World War.
The term "Third World" includes all the countries of Asia,
Africa, and Latin America that have appeared on the poli
tical map of the world and won their political indepen
dence in the last century. Despite differences in level
of socio-economic development, size and density of popula
tion, and ideological-political orientation of these
countries, they have many common features which justify
their definition as "Third World" or "developing coun
tries." These common features are the small scale of
per-capita production, low level of annual per capita
income, low productivity of labor, lack of capital, and
poor technology. However, the most important features are
similar socio-economic conditions and that these countries
have been subjected for a long time to colonialist exploi
tation. As Henri Alleg states: "All the countries con
sidered have some points in common, and first of all an
identical past of imperialist oppression that has left
them chained and in a state of economic and social back
wardness.
Finally, the concept of "foreign capital" means any
capital received from foreign sources (banks, governments,
g Political Terms (Moscow, Novosti Press Agency, 1982) , p.24. 9 Henri Alleg, "Perspectives of the National Libera tion Movement," Marxism Today 13 (September 1969): 259.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 11
private investors, and international organizations) by
means of loans or investment and used in financing domes
tic development. By foreign loans we mean "loans con
tracted in foreign money markets or extended by foreign
governments or international organizations."^ The varia
ble of "foreign capital" or "foreign loans" is very impor
tant in explaining the phenomenon of dependency, because
through foreign capital or loans, imperialist powers often
seize control of export markets and the raw material
sources of debtor countries which thus become economically
as well as politically dependent on the creditor coun
tries .
The Research Methodology
The research method to be used in this study will
entail an analytic procedure from the specific to the
general; the research will attempt to derive a general
conclusion from a particular case study based on available
data. These data will be analyzed within a historical
context over a period of twenty-two years, 1962-1984. The
year 1962 is selected because it marks the end of the
colonial period and capitalist social formation and the
beginning of a new era of political, economic and social
change. The date 1984 marks the end of Algeria's first
Five-Year Plan (1980-1984) .
^ABC Political Terms, p. 30.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 12
Due to the nature of the research and the research
questions under investigation, a comparative and quanti
tative analysis of the available data on economic develop
ment and industrialization of Algeria will be a useful
tool in explaining development processes. We will provide
a comparison between the different sectors of the economy,
such as industry and agriculture, and between the branches
of each sector, such as heavy industry and light industry.
Quantitative analysis will be carried out based on tables,
graphs, and statistics, allowing a final qualitative
assessment.
In considering our research questions, our analysis
will test the validity of De Bernis' theory of "indus
trializing industries" and to understand whether the trend
of economic development and industrialization experienced
by Algeria is moving toward establishing socialism or
building capitalism and thereby producing dependent devel
opment. Therefore, the main task is to study the process
of industrialization and economic development and its
direction. The selection of measurement for the major
variables of the study is essential as a starting point.
In this study, nationalization, percentage of imports,
volume of trade, foreign capital, capital-intensive and
labor-intensive industrialization, share of gross national
products, share of public ownership of the means of pro
duction, political and economic participation of the
working masses, and employment are the most important
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 13
indicators for explaining the process of this dependent
development. These indicators will enable us to determine
the destination of post-independence economic development
and industrialization in Algeria. The main sources of
available data are books, articles, government reports,
and documents published mainly between 1962-1984. These
sources are the most appropriate for examining the phenom
enon of development and industrialization in the Third
World.
Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework in which this study will be
carried out is that of political economy. The central
thesis which will guide the research and analysis is that
Algeria, like other Third World countries, is witnessing
major economic development and industrialization. Through
out this process of industrialization, Algeria is experi
encing dependent capitalist economic development.
There are different schools of thought and perspec
tives in dealing with the developing or newly independent
countries of the Third World. Some writers believe that
countries such as Algeria are in fact socialist countries,
while others maintain that they are state-capitalist, and
a third line of interpretation sees them as being on the
road of non-capitalist development toward socialism.
Since our thesis is to be studied within the theoretical
framework of political economy, it is necessary to discuss
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4
first the political economy approach to the study of
economic development and underdevelopment.
The main features of the political economy approach
are as follows:
1. It deals with the Third World countries and their
relationship to the imperialist world.
2. It is a historical approach in the sense that
development cannot be understood except in a historical
context.
3. It is concerned with wealth and income distribu
tion as key determinants of the kind of development the
society is experiencing.
4. Control of the economy is the key to power, and
hence the key to major economic decisions that determine
the kind of economic development.
Political economy sees revolution as the main vehicle
of social and economic change, and socialism as the next
stage of human development. There are two major schools
of thought within the political economy paradigm: the
orthodox Marxist school, and the dependency school. Both
schools agree in the sense that development and under
development cannot be understood except in a historical
context. The main difference between the two schools in
explaining underdevelopment is the emphasis of the ortho
dox Marxist school on internal class structure and the
emphasis of the dependency school on the relation between
capitalist and imperialist countries and controlling power
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5
in the Third World. In other words, the dependency theory
explains underdevelopment more through international
economic and political relations than through the internal
class structure.
Orthodox Marxist theory. This theory originated with
Karl Marx, and later was developed by Engels, Lenin, Mao,
Sweezy, Amin, Frank, John Gurley and Paul Baran. The
orthodox school will be represented here by John Gurley
and Paul Baran.
According to Gurley, the ruling classes in the devel
oping countries are directly responsible for underdevelop
ment in the Third World. Overthrowing the ruling classes
is a necessary condition for overcoming the phenomenon of
underdevelopment. Gurley emphasizes the role of class
structures in blocking development by asserting that the
ruling classes are usually afraid of revolutionary social
change, and therefore it is not in their interest to
establish a sound economic development program which will
raise the consciousness of the masses.^
For Baran, the phenomenon of underdevelopment is seen
as "the condition in which human and material resources
have been greatly underutilized or altogether unemployed,
^John Gurley, "Economic Development: A Marxist View", in Directions in Economic Development, eds. Kenneth P. Jameson and Charles K. Wilber (Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame University Press, 1979), p. 25.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 16
12 accompanied by low output." This condition is histori
cal, and it exists because of the penetration of capital
ism into Third World countries. According to Baran, Third
World states represent the property-owning classes, and
therefore no economic development occurs in the Third
World countries without fundamental changes in their
political structures through breaking the alliance between
feudal landlords, industrial and business leaders. Thus,
revolutionary change is necessary for development in the
Third World.
Dependency school. This school of thought maintains
that the process of underdevelopment is a historical
process created by capitalist expansion that led to colon-
ialization and imperialism. To study underdevelopment, we
must begin by examining the historical factors that con
tributed to it and analyzing the relationships between
underdeveloped countries and the world. Underdevelopment
must be seen in relation to a world economic system. This
view has been discussed extensively in the work of Samir
Amin, Andre Gunder Frank, Celso Furtado, Theotonio Dos
Santos, and Keith Griffin. To Amin, state-capitalism is
nothing but a new form of the colonial dependency rela
tionship. In Unequal Development, he says:
Now these are, so far as relations between the developed and the underdeveloped parts of the
12 Paul Baran, The Political Economy of Growth, (New York, Monthly Review Press, 1957), p. 165.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7
world are concerned, structures of asymmetrical domination by the center of the world system over the periphery. External equilibrium...is possible only because the structures of the periphery are shaped so as meet the needs of accumulation at the center.
Amin attempts to explain underdevelopment through the
concept of "unequal development" which focuses on the
effects of the center on the periphery. He believes that
unless the peripheral countries break away entirely from
the capitalist system they have no chance of achieving
economic development. This implies that revolutionary
political and social change is required. By the same
token, Frank maintains that
...contemporary underdevelopment is in large part the historical product of past and continu ing economic and other relations between the satellite underdeveloped and the now developed metropolitan countries... these relations are an essential part of the structure and development of the-capitalist system on a world scale as a whole.
Here, instead of the concepts of "center" and "periphery",
Frank introduces the terms "metropolis" and "satellite" in
referring to capitalist countries and Third World coun
tries, respectively, to demonstrate the kind of relation
ship between the two worlds — center and periphery.
According to him, the underdevelopment phenomenon is the
13 Samir Amin, Unequal Development (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976), p. 104. 14 Andre G. Frank, "The Development of Underdevelop ment " in The Political Economy of Development and Under development, ed. Charles K. Wilber (New York: Random House, 1973), p. 95.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8
product of the historical development of the capitalist
system and the continuing economic and political relations
between the "metropolis" and "satellite" countries. Dos
Santos believes that
[i]n order to understand the system of dependent reproduction and the socio-economic institutions created by it, we must see it as part of a system of world economic relations based on monopolistic control of large-scale capital, on control of certain economic and financial centers over others, on a monopoly of a complex technology that leads to unequal and combined development at a national and international level.
He goes on to say, "in reality we can understand what is
happening in the underdeveloped countries only when we see
that they develop within the framework of a process of X 6 dependent production and reproduction."
For Furtado,
The relations between "central and peripheral" countries are, however, much more complex....A fundamental aspect which is usually overlooked is the fact that when certain countries got to be peripheral, they were transformed into importers of new consumer goods, which were the fruits of technical progress in the central countries. Furthermore, this process of adopt ing new patterns consumption was bound to be a very uneven one.
15 Theotonio Dos Santos, "The Structure of Depen dence," American Economic Review 60 (May 1970): 235. 16t, . , Ibid. 17 Celso Furtado, "The Concept of External Development in the Study of Underdevelopment," in The Political Econo my of Development and Underdevelopment, ed. Charles K. Wilber (New York: Random House, 1973), p. 118.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 9
According to Furtado, external dependency is a structural
situation in which such peripheral capitalism prevails in
certain countries. Griffin has also argued that we cannot
understand the origin of underdevelopment without studying
the forces of history. He has analyzed this phenomenon by
saying:
It is our belief that underdeveloped countries as we observe them today are a product of historical forces, especially of these forces released by European expansion and world ascen dancy. Thus, they are a relatively recent phenomenon. Europe did not discover the under developed countries; on the contrary, she created them.
Non-Capitalist School. Like the dependency school,
the school of non-capitalist development interprets under
development in the Third World as a historical process
caused by the colonial exploitation of the imperialist
countries. This school will be represented by two of its
thinkers, V.G. Solodovnikov, director of the African
Institute of the USSR, and Yuri Popov, specialist in the
socio-economic problems of the Third World and the devel
opment of economic thought in African countries.
Solodovnikov sees non-capitalist development in the newly
independent African countries as a path of advancement
toward socialism, by-passing or terminating capitalism.
For him, the road of non-capitalist development of the
liberated countries
18 Keith Griffin, "Underdevelopment in History," in The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment, ed. Charles K. Wilber (1973), p. 72.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 20
...is a practical possibility in all countries which have...a mass revolutionary movement which rejects capitalism, and the existence of a revolutionary democratic party which accepts the principles of scientific socialism and is capable of leading the revolutionary upsurge of the masses into a new society.
Solodovnikov stresses that the need for a transitional
stage of non-capitalist development is an objective law of
development necessitated by the fact that these countries
did not yet have the material, technical, social, and
political basis for the construction of socialism. These
countries still need to develop their productive forces in
industry and agriculture. Similarly, Popov says: "The
main cause of economic backwardness of the people of Asia,
Africa, and Latin America is the colonialist exploitation
to which they have been subjected." 20 He also argues that
non-capitalist development is opening the road to a tran
sition to socialism in the Third World. According to this
school, there are five elements by which revolutionary
democratic regimes lead Third World societies to social
ism:
1. They force imperialism to make concessions
through nationalization of raw material production and
producer-country cartels.
19 V.G. Solodovnikov, "The Non-Capitalist Road of Development in Africa" Marxism Today 13 (September 1969) : 280. 20 Yuri Popov, The Developing Countries from the Standpoint of Marxist Political Economy (Moscow: Novosti Press Agency, 1977), p. 13.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 21
2. They promote agrarian reform.
3. The revolutionary democratic regime promotes
industrialization through the anti-capitalist state sector
and central planning.
4. The regime encourages the political participation
of working people and is concerned with their welfare.
5. The transition to socialism will finally come
when the working class and its Marxist-Leninist Party
assume leadership of society. 21
The theorists of this school have made a distinction
between socialist-oriented countries and socialist coun
tries. Algeria, for example, is one of the socialist-
oriented countries. This school does not see any contra
diction between opening the path to socialism and the
participation of foreign capital in financing development.
The Socialist Perspective. The socialist perspective
is held by the political leaders of the developing coun
tries, such as Gamal Abdl-Nasser, Sekou Toure, Modibo
Keita, Kwame Nkrumah, and Ben Bella and Houari Boummediene,
who openly proclaim that their goal is socialism. In
their speeches, which are usually used as underlying
principles of party programs and documents of mass politi
cal organizations, they claim that their countries are
socialist countries. For example, the Algerian President
21 Karen Pfeifer, "State Capitalism and Development," MERIP Reports 78 (1979): 7.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 22
Chadli Bendjadid said to the Front of National Liberation
(FLN) and the Algerian people in his first speech:
I will strive to continue along the path traced by the late president Boummediene. I affirm that socialism is an irreversible option for our country. I pledge myself to fight for the maintenance of our national independence both politically and economically and-to maintain the mastery of our national wealth.
This view holds that these countries, at the internal
level, are trying to strengthen the public sector, to plan
economic development, to control the activities of foreign
capital, to speed the development of productive forces, to
build their own national industry, to encourage coopera
tion among peasants, and to carry out democratic transfor
mation in the interests of the working masses. At the
external level, the political-economic relations of these
countries resemble the relations of the socialist coun
tries in their position against imperialism and neo
colonialism. Henri Alleg, leader of the Algerian social
ist vanguard party, implies in his writings that these
nations can be seen as socialist nations while they are
building their scientific socialism. The reason is that
the choice is not socialism or capitalism; it is socialism
because socialism is the only choice left for them. Alleg
writes,
22 Harold C. Nelson (Ed.), Algeria: A Country Study (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1979), p. xii.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3
The colonial masses have had an entirely nega tive experience of capitalism. In their coun tries, it has never been an element of progress. It has not developed but, on the contrary, retarded productive forces...the majority of the people have the same hatred for both colonialism and the capitalist system that bred it.
Industrializing Industries Theory. The theory of
"industrializing industries," upon which the Algerian
development model is extensively based, departs from the
notion of producing machines by using machines, leading to
a greater liberation of man from nature. The accelerated
industrialization that Algeria has undertaken is often
considered the best illustration of the theory of economic
development by industrializing industries. The initiator
of this theory is the French economist M.G. De Bernis, who
is one of the most appreciated foreign consultants among
the Algerian economic authorities. De Bernis argues that
For the underdeveloped countries, the decisive fact in the industrialization process is the constitution of capital assets which are capable of feeding industry with the basic industrial products. Therefore, one has to start with the industries which produce the means of production and no£. with those which produce consumption goods.
The theory of industrializing industries rests on three
main features: large-scale industries, a very high capi
tal concentration, and production oriented to the means of
production rather than final consumption goods. It
23 Henri Alleg, "Perspectives of the National Libera tion Movement" Marxism Today 13 (September 1969): 261.
^4Jean-Claude Hazera, "Algerie: L'industrialisation acceleree", Les dossiers de Jeune Afrique 3 (1975): 118.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4
appears that the main concern of De Bernis' theory is with
the development of large-scale industry and above all
those branches which produce means of production.
This study assumes that throughout the actual econom
ic development and process of industrialization, Algeria
is experiencing dependent capitalist economic development.
From the beginning, in the Tripoli Programme of 1962,
socialist ideas and the demand to limit the ownership of
land were combined with the promise of favorable condi
tions for foreign capital investments and free transfer of
capital. One can argue that Algeria at that time, as a
newly independent country, was still under French colonial
pressure. However, even later on, under the Boummediene
regime, there was a strong tendency to use foreign capital
to develop industry. Boumediene declared:
It is in the national interest, within the framework of our (politico-economical) option ...not to exclude and especially not to discour age national private investment...likewise, foreign effort in investments, within the framework of our option.
As our brief theoretical review has shown, neither
the orthodox Marxist theory nor the dependency theory
alone can explain the process of economic development and
industrialization in the Algerian social formation. This
is true because, on the one hand, we cannot understand the
relationship between the center and periphery by studying
25 Marnia Lazreg, The Emergence of Classes in Algeria (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, Inc., 1976), p. 112.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5
only the internal class structure. On the other hand,
studying only the relationship between center and peri
phery will not help us much to understand the class struc
ture in the society under investigation. Although we
believe that the process of underdevelopment in Algeria
was maintained mainly by the internal class structure, we
also believe that this condition was partly helped by the
local or national bourgeoisie who appropriates a large
portion of the national income and who benefits directly
from the dependency relationship with imperialist coun
tries (see class analysis, p. 111).
In conclusion, we propose a new adjusted theoretical
framework in which Algeria — and perhaps most of the
third world countries — should be studied: a theoretical
framework joining both orthodox Marxist theory and Depen
dency theory. This means that the most appropriate theo
retical framework in which the current Algerian social
formation should be studied is that of both its internal
class structure and the relationship between its class
structure and the international economic setting. How
ever, the following analysis will finally determine wheth
er Algeria is indeed experiencing dependent capitalist
economic development.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. C H A P T E R I I
GENERAL HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
In this historical review we will discuss the situa
tion of agriculture and industry during the French coloni
al period, 1830-1962; the nature of the class conflict
that led to the Algerian revolution in 1954 and indepen
dence in 1962? and finally, the French development plan,
the so-called Constantine Plan, 1959-1964, and the major
problems that Algerian industry inherited from the coloni
al order.
Before we discuss Algerian society under French
occupation, it is necessary to shed some light on the
Algerian pre-colonial social formation. Due to the
various invasions that Algeria faced in its history, the
Algerian social structure cannot be reduced to any specif
ic pre-capitalist social formation. French military men
and colonial administrators saw the Algerian form of
property either as "communal" or "feudal," depending on
the purpose the interpretation was to serve. Algerian
landownership was claimed to be "communal" when French
immigrants needed land, and the only way to take it was to
declare that the indigenous population lived under a
"communal system" that was an obstacle to progress. It
26
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7
was considered "feudal" where the colonists needed labor
which they could get only by detaching small farmers from
landowners (local aristocracy). Rene Gallissot, in his
study L'Alqerie precolonial classes sociales en systeme
precapitaliste, argued that Turkish domination, combined
with the tribal mode of economic organization, formed a
special mode of production referred to as "Communal
Feudalism."* This type of feudalism was seen as somewhat
different from the accepted European feudal model, in that
it encompassed both town and country. The European model
was country-based and gradually produced an antagonistic
relationship between town and country, whereas in Algeria
the type of feudalism was based on the subordination of
the country to the town. Mahfoud Bennoune, in his dis
cussion of The Origin of the Algerian Proletariat, argued
that the Algerian pre-colonial social formation was a 2 semi-feudal state.
In reality, the Algerian pre-colonial social forma
tion was neither feudal nor semi-feudal nor communal;
neither was it made up of nomadic tribes roaming through a
vast land. It was customary for Algerian tribesmen to
leave part of their land in order to avoid exhausting it
*Rene Galissot, L'Alqerie precoloniale classes sociales en systeme precapitaliste (Paris: Centre d 1Etudes et de Recherches Marxistes, 1968), p. 26. 2 Mahfoud Bennoune, Algerian Peasants and National Politics (Washington D.C.: MERIP Reports, No. 48, 1976), p. 16.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8
and move on to cultivate new plots within a given terri
tory. This was wrongly interpreted by French colonists as
a sign of a generalized nomadic life style. Identifica
tion of the Algerian property structure is easier if it is
compared with the pre-capitalist economic formation
described by Marx. Marx distinguished between the Asiat- 3 ic, Germanic, and Ancient types of property. In compar
ing pre-capitalist Algeria to these three types of econom
ic formations, we can say that in the areas where Melk
property (private property) was predominant (as in
Mitidja), the Algerian socio-economic structure was of the
Ancient type. Wherever Arsh property (tribal property)
predominated, Algeria approximated the Asiatic type of
economic formation. Wherever Melk and Arsh coexisted in
such a way that Arsh was a simple supplement to Melk,
Algeria was closer to the Germanic type.
Algerian Social Formation Under French Occupation, 1830-1962
Algerian history has been characterized by various
invasions such as those of the Romans, Byzantines, Arabs,
Turks, and finally the French. In 1830, France began its
conquest of Algeria and proceeded to colonize the terri
tory. However, the French military conquest could not
control the entire country until 1848. The history of
3 Karl Marx, Pre-Capitalist Economic Formation, tr. Jack Cohen (New York: International Publishers, 1965) , pp. 65 ff.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9
Algeria for the next quarter of a century is mainly
concerned with the gradual reduction of continuing opposi
tion against colonization. A policy of widespread confis
cation of land and its transfer to settler groups was
pushed forward. Many French people were attracted to
Algeria; most of them engaged in business and agriculture.
However, the rural "traditional" sector where the Algerian
population lived remained separate from the modern econom
ic infrastructure of the European community. After 1848
the influx of colonists increased greatly, with the
approval of the government of the second republic. A
further stimulus to colonization was provided by the
widespread confiscation of lands. By 1860, much of the
best land in Algeria was in French hands, and French
settlers rapidly became the dominant power in the land.
After the Algerian revolt of 1871, the situation was
normalized by the new French administration. From that
time until the end of the nineteenth century, Algeria was
the scene of considerable economic progress and increasing
European immigration, especially from Italy. The main
feature of this period was the growth of large-scale
agriculture, concentrated in the hands of the settlers.
Thus, after more than 300 years of subjection to
Turkish rule, the French colonial regime aimed at destroy
ing Algerian society for the purpose of realizing capital
accumulation. The 1833 African Committee reported: "The
question, above all, for France, is to colonize part of
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0
North Africa for providing a market outlet to its industry 4 and trade." The further advancement of capitalism in
France required two main factors: (1) a new market for
the European capitalist export countries, and (2) control
of the sources of raw material. Accordingly, Algeria was
seen as a vital potential market where capital could be
realized, as in other social formations in the Third World
such as Latin America and India. Algeria was not only
meant to be a new market for French goods; it was also to
become a settlement colony. The French began an official,
systematic policy of settlement, encouraging immigration
from Alsace-Lorraine and southeastern France as well. The
expropriated land was given to large private investment
companies in the hope that they would stimulate immigra
tion and establish more settlement. The flow of European
settlers continued for the next 30 years.
Social, Economic, and Political Conditions
The French rule that emerged after the invasion aimed
at changing the social, economic, and political activities
of pre-colonial Algeria that had been devoted to produc
tion for use rather than commodities for exchange. This
was most evident in the rural communities; in the urban
4 A. Benachenhou, Formation du Sous-Developpement en Algerie: essai sur les limites de developpement du capitalisme 1830-1962 (Algiers: Office des Publications Universitaires, 1976), p. 53.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1
centers, artisans and merchants had been involved to a
certain extent in production for exchange.
The majority of the Algerian people lived in rural
conditions, mainly on small farms and often on marginal
land. Some of them were literally landless, while others
were underemployed, as their own land would not yield
enough for them to live upon; they had to work for Euro
pean farms. Not only did Algerians have the poorer land,
but they were far behind in education, having an illiter
acy rate in 1954 of about 90 percent, with about 9 percent
being able to read and write. The European community in
Algeria was generally much better off than the Algerians,
owning about 90 percent of the industry and 40 percent of
the best land in the country; all of them were either
large colons, landowners, or administrators.
The most important act of the French government
concerned the destruction of the indigenous property
system. Three major decisions put an end to the Algerian
form of property. These were the 1844-46 ordinances and
the 1863 and 1873 laws. In the 1844-46 ordinances, the
administration declared the expropriation of all land that
appeared to be uncultivated, regardless of Habus property
(religious property). It claimed that Habus constituted
an obstacle to the development of industry. French
colonists moved into tribal land. The tribal communal
pastures became the property of the French state. The
1863 law proposed to distribute the inventoried Arsh
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2
property among individual members of the tribes. The
intention was to create individual property of the Euro
pean kind. Land was divided into three categories:
(1) collective cultivation lands, (2) collective pasture-
land, declared to be property of the tribes, and (3) Melk
land.
The 1873 law constituted a third historic measure in
terms of the destruction of the tribal organization of
Algeria. This law undertook to determine the individual
property of the tribesmen and to enforce the use of French
law in all land transaction, not only between Algerian and
Europeans, but among Algerians as well. These laws
accelerated the process of destroying Algerian social
formation and resulted in social change. This change can
be examined on three levels: (1) the level of the indi
vidual's relation to property, (2) the structural level,
and (3) the institutional level. The first consequence of
the 1846 ordinance was a sharp decline in cattle because
of the expropriation of cattle land. The natives were
forced to give up this traditional form of their activity.
They sold their cattle and sought work with the new
European landowners. As a consequence, Khammasa and wage
laborers emerged as two new social categories. Rural wage
labor was comprised of semi-permanent and permanent
workers. They were hired by individual colonists and
private companies. Under this category, the Khammasa
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3
existed as those who worked seasonally and got paid in
kind, receving one-fifth of the production.
The radical change in the structure of Algerian
property naturally affected the social organization of the
tribes. The process of dislocation replaced kinship
tribes with locality-tribes. Fractions of different
tribes were combined to form a single Duar. This disloca
tion of tribal organization was necessarily reflected in
the composition of the social groups that made up the
tribes. For example, the old aristocracy was displaced by
a new, composed of those who fought in the ranks of the
French army and those appointed to serve in the military
administration. In urban centers, where the rise of
industry and the expansion of trade took place, the old
handcraft workshops declined. Leather and copper crafts
men, along with wood workers, disappeared as independent
producers and became wage laborers. The small traditional
bourgeoisie became hostile to the French and gradually
became a marginal social class. In its place there
emerged a new social category comprised of businessmen,
exporters of farm production, wholesale and retail grain
dealers, tobacco dealers, oil manufacturers, and land
lords .
At the institutional level, the policy of cantonment
resulted in the breakdown and ultimately the disappearance
of those tribal institutions that had helped individuals.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4
The appropriation of Habus estates by the French adminis
tration resulted in the abolition of the Zawias (religious
institutions) as provident institutions which used to
advance grain to the poor peasants.
Agriculture
Until about 1880, the emergence of capitalism in
Algeria was still limited because the destruction of the
traditional mode of production was not achieved until
1871. The emergence of capitalism was characterized in
the rural areas by "formalist capitalism" and in the urban
areas by "primary industrial stages."*’ The fundamental
departure of capitalism as a dominant mode of production
in Algeria occurred only after 1880.
Confiscation of the means of production took differ
ent forms. Sometimes it took the form of outright confis
cation, sometimes that of purchase by force. Algerian
economic history was marked by the transformation of land
into a commodity for sale. This situation was described
by Lerry Beaulier, who stated that Algeria became for the
European capitalists an agricultural colony in which they
purchased and sold crop land. We find, for example, that
Debonno had bought 1,000 hectares of crop land; Chiris
owned 710 hectares; the real estate agricultural company
^Benachenhou, Formation du sous-developpement en Algerie, p. 125.
^Ibid., p. 145.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5
of El-Harrach possessed 460 hectares; and Le Chapeau de
Gendarme possessed 500 hectares. As a consequence, the
French administration thought it was necessary to create a
company specializing in the purchase and sale of land.
The Lyon Agricultural Company of North Africa was estab
lished in 1900 and owned 397 hectares in the first year.
As a result of the policy of separating the workers
from their means of production, confiscating land, and
destroying the traditional mode of production, the peas
ants described their social and economic conditions as
follows:
We have been submitted to all kinds of pres sures. We used to own the land but the colons bought it from us by force. After that we were obliged to sell even our cattle and work for them. In any way, we ar§ not the ones who created the property law.
The two dominant sectors in colonial agriculture were
wine and wheat. These two sectors were the source of
capital accumlation throughout the period of French
occupation. Table 1 shows the significant increase in the
number of vineyards and wheat-cultivated land. The
vinicultural sector had two main features: (1) its
domination within Algerian capitalist agriculture, and (2)
its capital concentration. Accordingly, we can say that
capital accumulation in viniculture was the fundamental
factor for the development of capitalism because of the
large number of workers being hired in this sector and the
®Ibid., p. 83.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6
TABLE 1
EXPANSION OF VINEYARDS AND WHEAT- CULTIVATED LAND BY EUROPEANS (Hectares)
Years Vineyards Wheat
1880 23,724 372,722 1885 70,886 535,931 1890 110,048 435,759 1895 122,186 417,624 1900 154,430 532,091 1905 179,950 591,091 1910 152,129 752,750 1914 180,735 887,521
SOURCE: A. Benachenhou, Formation du sous-developpement en Algerie (Alger, Office des Publications Universi- taires, 1976), pp. 140, 149.
TABLE 2
VALUE OF EXPORTED WINE PRODUCTION, BY THOUSANDS OF FRENCH FRANCS
Value of Years export
1905 51,091 1906 58,587 1907 75,964 1908 81,326 1909 95,512 1910 214,095 1911 203,475 1912 35,475 1913 164,166 1914 97,920
SOURCE: A. Benachenhou, Formation du sous-developpement en Algerie (Alger, Office des Publications Universi- taires, 1976), p. 142.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 7
role it played in external trade. In regard to external
trade, Table 2 indicates the increase in the value of
exported wine. The export of wine was very significant in
terms of the total Algerian export. For example, the
export of wine during the ten years indicated in Table 2
reached a value of one-third of all Algerian exports.
Statistically, the value of exported wine exceeded the
value of wheat by 15 percent.
Between 1920 and 1934, viniculture had expanded
significantly, due to the expansion of wine markets and
the increase in prices. The output of wine in this period
exceeded that of France. For example, in France in 1932,
131 companies produced less than 250 thousand hectolitres,
whereas Algeria in the same year, with only 113 companies,
produced for the French market a quantity of 2,087
thousand hectolitres. In 1939, the production of wine
reached its highest stage. Table 3 shows the expansion of
viniculture in size, production, and export for the period
1921-1934. In the same period, wheat agriculture did not
expand in terms of area, because the labor force was
attracted by viniculture which was encouraged by the
French administration. For example, the value of European
agricultural production in 1934 in wine was 961,000 French Q Francs, whereas the value of wheat was only 696,000 FF.
9 A. Benachenhou, Formation du sous-developpement en Algerie, p. 174.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 8
TABLE 3
VINICULTURE EXPANSION IN SIZE AND PRODUCTION (1921-1934)
Area Production Export Years (hectares) - - - (hectolitres) - - -
1921 168,742 7,034,267 1924 180,757 10,141,589 7,394,048 1927 207,367 8,402,618 7,121,531 1930 234,916 12,821,141 10,939,434 1934 373,292 16,631,032 11,652,304
SOURCE: A. Benachenhou, Formation du sous- developpement en Algerie (Alger, Office des Publications Universitaires, 1976), p. 163.
Thus, wine production constituted 46 percent of Algerian
agricultural production, while wheat production constitut
ed only 33 percent. In other words, both wine and wheat
production constituted 79 percent of the entire agricul
tural production of Algeria. This means that those who
controlled wine and wheat agriculture controlled public
opinion and made the political and economic decisions.
The second dominant sector in colonial agriculture
was wheat agriculture. Between 1885 and 1900, as Table 1
shows, there was a significant reduction in wheat-
cultivated land because of the large quantity of wheat
imported to Europe from Canada, India, and Australia.
From 1900 to 1915 the wheat situation improved because of
a change in cultivation methods. The Europeans began to
use the "dry-farming" method in most of the regions of the
country.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 9
Due to the first world war, the demand for Algerian
agricultural production (wine, wheat, fruits, vegetables,
wood, and leather) rapidly increased. This increase in
export, as Table 4 shows, led to a high profit among
traders and those who controlled wine and wheat agricul
ture. We can conclude that the colonial agricultural
development was dominated by two main sectors of produc
tion: wine and wheat.
TABLE 4
MOVEMENT OF EXTERNAL TRADE (Thousands of French Francs)
Years Exports
1914 374,624 1915 537,107 1916 631,694 1917 856,269 1918 794,074
SOURCE: A. Benachenhou, Formation du sous-developpement en Alge'rie (Alger, Office des Publications Uni- versitaires, 1976), p. 154.
Industry
From the beginning it was French policy that the
country should provide an outlet for the industrial
products of France. Accordingly, few industries, and none
of any magnitude, were established in Algeria in the
nineteenth century, the accent being on encouraging the
colons to concentrate upon agriculture. This policy began
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4 0
to change in the twentieth century, but industry in
Algeria did not develop to any great extent until after
World War II. Some small industies, especially those
making consumer goods, were established, but still within
a primarily agricultural economic base. Table 5 indicates
the distribution of workers by types of industries in
1890.
TABLE 5
WORKERS, BY TYPE OF INDUSTRY, 1890
Number of Types of industry Workers
Food 6,191 Chemical production 536 Construction 4,040 Wood industries 2,342 Textiles 15,023 Mine workers 2,429 Clothing 1,187 Leather 691 Paper industries 771 Divers 1,627
SOURCE: A . Benachenhou, Formation du sous-developpement en Algerie (Alger: Office des Publications Uni- versitaires, 1976), p. 124.
NOTE: Original source: Statistique gene'ral de l'Alcjerie publiee par le gouvernement general. No further details given.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 41
The military conquest of Algeria was characterized by
violence. The socio-economic consequence of this conquest
was the destruction of the traditional industries or
artisans. In 1868, a law was passed by the French admini
stration to destroy, by every means, the artisan system,
sometimes by putting restrictions on getting raw materi
als, at other times by increasing their prices. In this
way, the Algerian craftsmen were deprived of their own raw
materials, which were put at the service of French indus
try. We should take into account the historical transfor
mation of the peasants into workers selling their labor
power, which led to the separation of the craftsmen and
their clients because of the decline in the purchasing
power of the peasants. As a result, many handcraft
workers had no other alternative but to be hired on a
day-to-day basis. A large number became dockworkers in
the port of Algiers.
Colonial administrators were alarmed that this shift
of native people into the proletariat might constitute a
great danger for the future. The rapid development of
colonization pulled a large number of people from the
tribal communities into the European colonial farms and
plants as wage laborers. Thus the French state succeeded
not only in tying a large number of agricultural workers
to the plantation of the settlers, but also in attracting
many migrant workers to metropolitan France itself, where
they were transformed into an industrial labor force.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 42
Heavy industry was not established until the late
1950s and early 1960s, after the discovery of oil at
Hassi-Massoud and gas at Hassi-R'mel in 1956 and the
implementation of the Constantine plan in 1959. Because
of the large sums of capital and technical problems
involved, the setting-up rate of heavy industry was
normally slower than that of the conversion industries.
For this reason, special attention was given to the
processing industries in the industrialization programs.
The processing industries were expected to furnish 400,000
new jobs needed to reduce unemployment and absorb the
increasing numbers of rural people emigrating to the
cities.
During the first two years of the plan, four heavy
industries were approved — one in 1959 and three in 1960.
In 1960, a total of 500 companies applied for approval to
locate in Algeria and 417 concerns had already been
approved, representing a potential investment of about
$200 million and the creation of 30,000 jobs. The major
heavy industrial projects began to take shape in 1961. A
start was made in the mining of the Djebel Onk phosphate
deposits; work began on the Annaba Steel Plant and the
Algiers Petroleum Refinery; and the a large petrochemical
complex using natural gas was established at Arzew.
If 1959 was the year for petroleum, 1960 opened up
the age of gas. The gas deposits at Hassi-R'Mel are among
the largest known in the world. The recoverable reserves
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4 3
under the technical conditions of that time were estimated
at over 35 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. A petro
chemical complex planning to utilize the higher grades of
methane for export was made possible by the liquefaction
of natural gas. A nitrate fertilizer factory had already
been officially approved under this industrialization
plan. Accordingly, the Arzew-Mostaganem region had became
the center for the development of heavy industry using
natural gas, and Hassi-R'Mel was treated by the French as
one of the important sources of energy for Western Europe.
TABLE 6
JOBS AND INVESTMENT (1958-1960)
Total Investment (millions of Years New Jobs French francs)
1958 1,208 6.7 1959 14,933 79.7 1960 13,514 115.2
Total 29,665 201.6
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Housing, The Con- stantine Plan for Algeria (Washington D.C., 1961), p. 32.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 44
TABLE 7
APPROVED INDUSTRIAL CONCERNS (1958-1960)
Years Number Approved New Companies
1958 17 6 1959 176 76 1960 224 139
Total 417 221
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Housing, The Con- stantine Plan for Algeria (Washington D.C. , 1961), p. 32.
TABLE 8
INVESTMENT FOR 1961 (Millions of Dollars)
Source of Funds France Algeria Total
Public investment 292 90 382 Private investment 170 280 450
Total 462 370 832
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Housing, The Con- stantine Plan for Algeria (Washington D.C. , 1961) , p. 34.
Birth of Nationalism and Political Struggle
The spirit of nationalism emerged among the Algerian
as a force to be counted after the First World War.
Nationalist aspirations began to be voiced not only by
resident Algerians, but also by Algerians who went to
France to study or work. In 1924 one of these students,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4 5
Messali Hadj, founded the first Algerian nationalist
newspaper in Paris, in collaboration with the French
Communist Party. His movement called for total indepen
dence, the recall of French troops, the establishment of a
revolutionary government, large-scale reforms in land
ownership, and the nationalization of industrial enter
prises. More moderate doctrines were put forward in the
post-war years by an influential body of French-educated
Algerians, formalized in 1930 as the Federation of Muslim
Councillors. Under the leadership of Farhat Abbas, this
group called for integration with France on a basis of
complete equality.
The years immediately prior to World War II were
marked by growing nationalist discontent, in which Messali
Hadj played a significant part with the formation of the
Party of the Algerian People (PPA). Although the Vichy
administration in Algeria, strongly supported by French
settlers, opposed nationalist sentiments, the Allied
landings in North Africa in 1942 provided an opportunity
for the Algerian nationalists to put forward their consti
tuent demands. A group headed by Farhat Abbas in 1942
presented to the French authorities and Allied Military
Command a memorandum calling for the post-war establish
ment of an Algerian constituent assembly, to be elected by
universal suffrage. These proposals were followed early
in 1943 by the "Manifesto of the Algerian People", which
called for immediate reforms. Further proposals submitted
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 46
emphasized the post-war creation of an Algerian state with
a constitution to be determined by a constituent assembly,
and looked forward to an North African union, comprising
Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco. But the French administra
tion in Algiers rejected the manifesto and the subsequent
proposals out of hand. Farhat Abbas shortly afterward
founded the Friends of the Manifesto of Freedom (AML), to
work for the foundation of an autonomous Algerian republic
linked federally with France. The new movement was based
mainly on the support of middle-class Algerians. Despite
the suppression and the dissolution of the AML, the
attempts to reach a compromise solution continued for some
time. In 1946 Farhat Abbas launched the Democratic Union
of the Algerian Manifesto (UDMA), with a program providing
for the creation of an autonomous secular Algerian state
within the French union. But the UDMA failed to achieve
any of its objectives.
In one of its compromise attempts, the French
government introduced a new constitution which became law
in 1947. This constitution gave all Algerian citizens,
including women, the right to vote and recognized the
Arabic language as equal in status to French. However,
this new constitution was never brought fully into opera
tion. The government's aim was to drive the main forces
of nationalism underground, and to destroy opposition to
French rule. After this political struggle, when the
Algerians could not obtain equal political rights, they
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 47
declared revolution against France in November 1954. The
revolution was launched by nine members of national
leaders organized into the National Liberation Front
(FLN) . The Algerian revolution was a part of the vast
movement which achieved the successive liberation of
former subject people throughout the world in the 20th
century. The struggle for national independence in
Algeria was not an isolated movement, but part of a world
wide struggle.
A secret congress of the FLN, held at Soummam, formed
a central committee, and the national council of the
Algerian revolution drew up a socialist program for the
future Algerian republic. This program will be fully
discussed in the next chapter. In 1958, General de Gaulle
came to power, believing that he would further the French
aim of complete integration of Algeria into France.
Although he pushed more military action against the FLN1s
capacity to continue fighting, the FLN responded in August
1958 by establishing in Tunisia the Provisional Government
of the Algerian Republic (GPRA), headed by Farhat Abbas,
including Ben Bella and other leaders.
Due to the rise of nationalist consciousness among
the Algerian people, the declaration of revolution, and
the strength of political struggle, the French government
decided to improve the social and economic conditions in
Algeria in order to attract the revolutionary leaders to
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4 8
compromise negotiations and maintain political and econom
ic control over the Algerian people. The French govern
ment devised a long-range program known as the Constantine
Plan, which was put into operation in 1959. In this year,
Charles de Gaulle visited Algeria and introduced this plan
to the Algerian people:
Before the end of those five years, the first phase of the plan for the agricultural and industrial development of Algeria will be brought to its conclusion. This phase includes in particular, the delivery and the distribution of oil and gas from the Sahara; the setting up, on this soil, of great metallurgical and chemi cal complexes; the construction of housing for a million people; the corresponding development of health services, of roads, ports, means of communication. In short, the regular employment of 400,000 new workers...gradually in the course of those five years, more than two thirds of the girls and boys will be enrolled in school and, during the three years after that, complete school enrollment of all Algerian youth will be achieved.
The goals of this plan were as follows:
1. The development of Algerian agriculture which
will promote the income of the rural population .
2. Increasing the family revenue of small farmers
and raising their standard of living within a short time .
3. Under the land reform, the rural landholding
system will be improved by means of land redistribution .
4. Increasing crop production by 25 percent.
^U.S. Department of Housing, The Constantine Plan for Algeria (Washington, D.C., 1961), p. 2.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4 9
5. Establishing industry that will provide 400,000
new jobs and reduce unemployment and absorb the rapid
population growth and the rural migration to the towns.
6. Increase activities in the field of construction,
public works, and housing.
7. Improving public services: education, health,
administration and communication.
8. Establishing heavy industry.
In reality, social and political stability was the French
government's major goal.
Despite the introduction of the Constantine plan and
its implications, the FLN rejected this offer and contin
ued the struggle. At this stage, De Gaulle recognized the
right of the Algerian people to self-determination and
moved cautiously towards accepting FLN demands. The
provisional government stated in its first declaration on
September 1958 that "the provisional government of the
Algerian republic is ready to begin negotiation. To
achieve this, it is ready at any moment to meet with
representatives of the French government."'*'^ In 1961,
direct negotiations between French and FLN representatives
began. After these protracted negotiations, a cease-fire
was signed by the French and the FLN in March 1962, at
Evian (on the French-Swiss border). Then a referendum was
■*^FLN, Algeria: Questions and Answers (New York, 1960), p. 15.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 0
held in Algeria, and France declared Algeria an indepen
dent state in July 1962.
Before we conclude this chapter, it is necessary to
look at the major problems that Algeria inherited from the
French colonial order. In 1962, Algeria appeared to be
emerging from a dark era of its history after more than a
century of colonial domination and almost eight years of
bloody war. However, with the departure of more than
nine-tenths of its European population in the months just
following independence, Algeria lost over half of its
skilled and trained work force, such as entrepreneurs,
managers, supervisors, technicians, professional persons,
office workers and skilled laborers. In 1964, the labor
force was estimated at four million; of those, nine-tenths
were unskilled and for the most part illiterate, and
two-thirds were in the agricultural sector and seriously
underemployed. The non-agricultural unemployement rate
probably reached as much as 50 percent. Henry Jackson
comments on this situation:
Because of the country's serious unemployment problem, high unemployment, under-employment affected the entire urban labor force in 1963. For every four employed workers, there we^re three either under-employed or unemployed.
At the same time there was a shortage of skilled workers,
qualified white collar employees, and professional people.
12 Henry F. Jackson, The FLN in Algeria (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1977), p. 141.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 1
It was clear that the French colonization had a disastrous
effect on the immediate situation of the Algerian economy.
Algeria inherited some serious problems from the French
colonial order. These major problems included a mass of
under-employed or totally unemployed in both urban and
rural areas, a lack of professionals and experts, of a
highly centralized bureaucratic apparatus, and a structure
suited to capitalist forms of government. In this situa
tion, industrial production was set back almost a decade;
internal markets were severely disrupted; and the economy
continued to suffer from a severe lack of capital for
development, as well as a bureaucratic structure attempt
ing to impede the socialist goal and perpetuate capitalist
norms. The question of how to overcome these problems has
been at the center of Algerian policy since independence
and will be the focus of the next chapter.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER III
THE CHOICE OF THE ALGERIAN INDUSTRIAL MODEL AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
The choice of a development model and new socio
economic and political institutions at the time of inde
pendence was itself problematical because, on the most
vital issue, opinions were divided. In this chapter, we
will discuss the problematic choice of the socio-economic
development path of post-independence Algeria, specific
ally, the ideological and political foundation of the
socialist choice that referred to the Evian Agreement, the
Tripoli Programme, the March Decrees and the Algiers
Charter. We will also present the Algerian development
strategy in general and industrialization policy in
particular.
Ideological and Political Foundation
After the Second World War, and throughout the course
of the national liberation war that started in 1954, ideas
on the course of the national economy were born. Since
the period of armed struggle, some theses of economic
development and the means applicable to the independent
Algeria were presented. Between 1960 and 1962, in El-
Moudjahid, a journal edited by the National Front of
52
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 3
Liberation (FLN), these theses were clearly discussed, in
an attempt, to introduce the theory for constructing an
integrated national economy. With political independence
in 1962, these theses were refined to give birth to the
"Algerian Model of Development."
The most important official documents of the Algerian
revolution that defined the main tasks which were to be
undertaken at independence, and that outlined the coun
try's future development, were the' Evian agreement, the
Tripoli Programme, the Decrees of March, and the Algiers
Charter.
The Evian Agreement (March 1962)
The economic situation we traced in the previous
chapter was the background to the Evian Agreement signed
in March 1962. The negotiation of independence was only
acceptable with the condition that French economic inter
ests must be respected. For example, France was to keep a
military presence in Algeria and maintain control over the
Sahara which means to retain possession of the oil fields.
In fact, French complete domination over the Algerian
economy lasted from 1962 to 1964, when France finally
abandoned its claims. But oil and natural gas resources
remained under French control until 1971, when the Algeri
an government under Boumediene decided to nationalize 51
percent of the whole Hydrocarbons sector and 100 percent
of natural gas. At independence, the Algerian economy was
completely dependent on France. The Evian Agreement
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 4
stated in its first article that "Algeria will allow
France to continue its exploitation of the Sahara riches"^
until Algeria became able to carry out these activities by
itself.
At independence, the neo-colonialist authorities
tried to promote the formerly indigenous colonial civil
servants into managerial and administrative posts. About
50 percent of the personnel of the newly formed Algerian
government consisted simply of ex-colonial civil servants.
The major problems facing the FLN at independence were the
lack of qualified personnel to fill the administrative
machinery of the state and the drop in tax revenues that
left the newly formed government heavily in deficit and
reliant on external aid simply to cover its administrative
costs. It has been estimated that "the French government
was paying around 700,000 pound sterling a year to keep o the Algerian colonial administration functioning."
In the industrial and commercial sectors, the neo
colonial capital was dominant. According to the Evian
Agreement, Algeria must guarantee to the French enter
prises as well as to enterprises of which the large part
of capital was owned by the French, a normal exercise
*A. Decoufle, "Aspects socio-politique de 1'Accord Franco-Algerien du 29 Juillet 1965 sur,les hydrocarbures et le developpement de 1 'Algerie" in Economie Appliquee XIX (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966), p. 35. 2 Ian Clegg, Workers' Self-Management in Algeria (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971), p. 81.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 55
of their activities within excellent conditions and
without any discrimination. Also, the transfer of capital 3 from Algeria to France must enjoy a regime of freedom.
In the agricultural sector, the colonial authorities
thought that by granting political independence to the
national bourgeoisie and by placing it in power, they
would protect their interests and continue to benefit from
Algerian agriculture.
The Tripoli Programme (June 1962)
The FLN had not officially considered a socialist
policy until the Tripoli Programme was issued in June
1962, a month before independence. Although the Tripoli
Programme, which came to be adopted as the new platform of
the post-independence FLN, was considered the first for
mulation of the conception of development, its socialist
principles were stated in vague terms. The programme
called for political and economic independence, social
transformation and the destruction of colonialism. It
also advocated the construction of a socialist society
devoted to the service of man.
Although the program raised the aspirations of the
landless peasants and the urban proletarian masses, it
remained the platform of the petty bourgeois nationalists.
The entire program "overlooked the possibility that in the
3 Decoufle, Aspects socio-politique, pp. 35-39.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 56
post-independence period these classes could become antag- 4 onistic competitors for political and economic power."
In reality that was exactly what happened. Instead of
cooperating, the indigenous antagonistic classes were
competing for economic resources and political positions
on the eve of independence.
The Tripoli Programme was the first authoritative
document that gave some indication of the model of devel
opment to be implemented in post-independence Algeria. It
also expressed the controversy over this model of develop
ment which focused on the problematical choice between
heavy and light industrialization in particular, and
between the socialist and capitalist model of development
in general. The program states:
The true and lasting development of the country depends on the implantation of the basic indus tries which are necessary for the modern agri cultural sector. In this respect, Algeria has huge possibilities for promoting oil and metal lurgical industries. In this field, it is up to the state to create the conditions that are necessary for heavy industrialization.
Although the programme mentioned clearly the neces
sity of industrialization, it did not provide a clear and
decisive industrial policy because of the social conflict
in the choice between capital-intensive industries and
4 Mahfoud Bennoune, "Algerian Peasants and National Politics" in MERIP Reports 48 (June 1976): 8. 5 The text of the Tripoli Programme as an Appendix to Thomas L. Blaire, The Land to Those Who Work it (Garden City: Doubleday, 1970), pp. 258-259.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 7
labor-intensive industries. This controversy reflected
the major conflict of interests between the nationalist
bourgeois forces and the workers' socialist forces. As a
consequence, and despite the ambiguous nature of the
ideological principles of the programme, it stated: "The
state must not, at any cost, help to create a local
bourgeoisie which will benefit from industrialization.
Indeed it must limit such a development by the appropriate „6 measures.
Finally, we can conclude that the Tripoli Programme
provided a general outline for the development of Algeria
through nationalization, agrarian reform, and industrial
ization.
The March Decrees (March 1963)
It was not until the end of August that the govern
ment finally arrived at some decisions about what to do
with the abandoned French properties. A decree published
on August 24 put all vacant farms, factories, houses and
shops under the state control. The French owners were
given thirty days from the publication of the decree to
come back and resume management of their farms and factor
ies. If the owners failed to return by the end of this
period, the prefects were authorized to appoint managers
to run the enterprises. This decree was, therefore, an
^Ibid.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 8
emergency measure aimed at resuming the country's economic
activity.
The document that was to put Algeria in the vanguard
of socialism was composed of three decrees which became
known as the "March decrees." These decrees were a turn
ing point for the country and for the workers. The
expression "state management" entered the official lan
guage, as did "self-management," which became the main
feature of the government and particularly of the Ben
Bella regime. Also, as a result of the March decrees, the
probability of the return of the French was greatly
reduced, since the owners were obliged to accept co
management with the workers. These decrees were issued in
March 1962.
The first, of March 18, dealt with the state's
appropriation of abandoned assets and self-management 7 enterprises. It defined the meaning of vacancy as
applied to French properties in the country: any enter
prise that ceased regular production and any house or
apartment left unoccupied by the owner or his legal tenant
for more than two months was to be declared vacant and put
under the control of the state. As a consequence, several
hundred thousand French properties were nationalized.
7 The text of the March Decrees as an Appendix to Clegg, Workers' Self-Manaqement, p. 201.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 9
The second decree, of March 22, dealt with the
administration and organization of the self-managed
enterprises. It established that the vacant enterprises
O would be run by the workers through the following bodies:
1. The Workers' General Assembly. The workers
assembly is composed of all permanent workers of an
enterprise. It deals with general policy matters affect
ing the enterprise. It adopts the enterprise's annual
plans for production, supply, marketing, and distributing
of tasks among the workers.
2. The Workers' Council. The workers' council is
elected by the Workers' General Assembly. It is a body
that includes at least two-thirds of the workers in a
given enterprise. It adopts the internal regulation of
the enterprise and decides on the purchase and sale of
material equipment. The council also decides on the
exclusion of members and the admission of new permanent
workers and supervises the management committee.
3. The Management Committee. The management commit
tee is responsible for the general running of the enter
prise. It is composed of three to eleven members or
cadres elected by the Workers Council. The management
committee draws up the budget and all plans to be submit
ted to the vote of the General Assembly and Workers'
Council. It also makes decisions concerning short-term
®Ibid.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 60
loans, marketing and buying of equipment and materials.
Also, the management committee designates each year one of
its members as president. He presides over and directs
the discussions of the management committee, the Council,
and the General Assembly.
4. The Director. The director of the enterprise is
appointed by the government. He represents the state
within the enterprise and assures the legality of its
operations as well as their conformity with the national
development plan. He controls the treasury and directs
daily operations.
The third and last decree, of March 28, regulated the
income distribution in the workers' self-managed enter
prises. In other words, it established the principle that
the profit of the enterprise should be shared among the
Q workers. However, the highly complex and sophisticated
system of management set up by the March decrees required
for its success a degree of education and experience which
the Algerian peasants did not have. Moreover, the system
of management had not been carefully studied. Many
decrees created conflict within the enterprise. For
example, the decrees led to strife between the permanent
workers, who were members of the General Assembly and
shared in the profit, and the seasonal laborers, who did
not participate in either the management or the sharing of
9 Ibid., p. 203.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 61
profits. A second example was the conflict between the
elected management committees and the state-appointed
director. Ottaway stated in this respect:
A sharp conflict developed between the elected management committee and the state-appointed director. Although the system was supposed to give power to the workers, it had in fact given the greatest authority to the director ov^ whose activities the workers had no control.
In addition, the decrees failed to explain the role
of the government agency in charge of the socialist
sector. According to the text of the decrees, this agency
was charged only with naming the directors and with making
sure that the plan of each enterprise would fit into the
national plan. But on April 18, 1963, Ben Bella signed
another decree, which obliged the self-managed farms to
market their production through the same organization that
was financing them, and recommended that these farms no
longer use private channels for marketing but only the
state-run SAP (Societes Agricoles de Prevoyance) and the
CCSA (Caise Centrale des Societes Agricoles). This decree
was, of course, a violation of the March decrees, which
explicitly stated that the workers' management committee
"chooses the channel for the marketing of the produce."^
This decree was followed a week later by another, which
■^M. Ottaway, Algeria: The Politics of a Socialist Revolution (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970), pp. 61-62.
"^Ibid., p. 63.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6 2
put the SAP and the CCSA directly under the control of the
ONRA (Office National de la Reforme Agraire) and estab
lished that only ONRA could grant loans and credits to the
socialist firms. Thus, just one month after the publica
tion of the March decrees, the so-called self-managed
enterprises had lost all rights of decision over two
crucial matters: financing and marketing of their pro
duce. As a result,
Self-management was largely a myth...and the reality gave little ground for enthusiasm. While the farms had been deprived of much of their autonomy, the factories of the socialist sector were left totally to. ±hemselves and were hardly able to keep afloat.
The Algiers Charter (April 1964)
The third major event, and the most important at the
political and ideological levels, was the FLN's first
congress, held in Algiers in April 1964. The significance
of this congress lies in the fact that it represented the
conflict between the indigenous forces and produced the
first official document of the Algerian revolution which
came to be known as "The Algiers Charter." The present
regime still claims to believe in its principles and
respect its general guidelines. The basic question the
congress was supposed to answer was whether the socio
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6 3
economic and political system to be chosen was to be
socialism or capitalism.
Ben Bella called for the first FLN congress in April
1964 in order to clarify the ideological, political, and
socio-economic conflicts that prevailed between the
antagonistic national forces after independence. In spite
of the congress decision to make Algeria a truly democrat
ic socialist country, the Charter warned that the means of
production were not yet fully socialized and the revolu
tion was not strong enough to achieve this.13 Therefore,
it was suggested that a transitional period of the private
sector would be needed, while detailed plans were made for
total nationalization. During this period, it was felt
that it was necessary to keep the state as a managerial
rather than a fully democratic organ. In addition to
this, the Charter stressed that during the transitional
phase the basic questions the new society must ask itself
are these:
Who controls and sections the obligation to work? Who establishes the norms? If the answer indicates a separation between the social group charged with controlling the work of others and the di j | c t producers, then socialism is compro mised.
13 The text of the Algiers Charter as an appendix to Clegg, Workers' SeIf-Management, pp. 210-220.
14Ibid., pp. 219-220.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6 4
To prevent the creation of a bureaucratic state, the
Charter demanded the establishment of a radical adminis
tration with the aim of making the commune the basis of
political, economic, and social organization. It saw the
best mode of economic development as one that provided an
immediate solution to the problem of unemployment. For
this reason, the newly independent state under Ben Bella
supported the wide-spread use of labor power rather than
the use of foreign capital, involving advanced technology,
for long-term projects. The Charter also emphasized the
significance of industrialization in general and heavy
industry in particular. According to the Charter, indus
trialization must respond to three fundamental objectives:
1. The satisfaction of national consumption needs
and a reduction in the import of consumption goods
2. The preparation and supply of agriculture for
establishing the basis of an integrated economic develop
ment
3. The creation of new jobs and the absorption of
unemployment and underemployment
Concerning unemployment and underemployment, the Charter
indicated that
One of the [main] factors limiting accumulation is underemployment, which means that an impor tant percentage of the population consumes without producing. The entry of this "reserve army" into the cycle of economic production would certainly raise levels of consumption but this would be less than the concomitant increase
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 65
in production. The result5could be a very large increase in accumulation.
The Charter conceived the creation of new jobs, the
satisfaction of consumption needs, the reduction of
imported consumption goods, and the absorption of unem
ployed and underemployed workers as the logical basis of
giving priority to industrialization.
Moreover, the Charter recognized that the main
solution to the problem of economic organization and the
management of the production system lay in integration and
establishment of the socialist self-management system. It
stressed that growth must be carried out by the national
self-managed firms within the state development plan in
order to achieve the establishment of a socialist demo
cratic society. The Charter rejected the capitalist path
of development for the following reasons:
1. It hides a structure of social classes where
labor is simply a commodity subject to the market law
2. It brings about the crisis of overproduction and
unemployment, and gives rise to imperialism
3. It tends to spread in the contemporary world
through state intervention in economic affairs, thereby
creating state capitalism to protect the interests of
capitalists
15Ibid., p. 219.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 66
The alternative was the socialist path of development
which
...is not defined only by the nationalization of the means of production (but) also and especial ly by autogestion, a real solution to the double contradiction of private property and the separation^£etween decision making and decision execution.
At the theoretical level, the Algiers Charter may be
viewed as a further step towards the construction of an
Algerian socialist society. But in reality, it led
directly or indirectly to the institutionalization of
state capitalism and abolition of all previous socialist
achievements. Therefore, in spite of the congress'
acceptance of the Charter as the theoretical basis of the
FLN policy, this recognition remained largely formal.
According to Ian Clegg, despite the temporarily successful
attempt to placate the right wing functions and to make
them accept the socialist policy, it was the left wing
forces that were dominated by the bourgeois forces in that
they were administratively, economically, and militarily 17 powerless. We can conclude that the writers of the
charter had underestimated the task of constructing a
democratic socialist society. This, of course, could not
be achieved through a decision favoring either light or
^M.E. Benissad, Economie du developpement de 1 1Algerie (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 20. 17 Clegg, Workers1 Self-Manaqement, pp. 138-139.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 67
heavy industries. They also overlooked the fact that a
socialist revolution cannot be achieved simply by formu
lating highly sophisticated socialist theories and pro
grammes .
Algerian Development Strategies
The controversy over the choice of socialist or
capitalist development, heavy or light industries, and
capital-intensive or labor-intensive industrialization
resulted in the adoption of an economic development
strategy. From 1962 to 1965 and under the Ben Bella
regime, a strategy of labor-intensive and light industri
alization policy was adopted. But since 1965, under the
Boumediene regime, this strategy of development was
changed. The government began the adoption of capital-
intensive and accelerated heavy industrialization to the
extent that some major sectors of the national economy
became completely neglected. Thus, the tendency of the
Algerian economic development strategy shifted and changed
from labor-intensive to capital-intensive, from light
industries to heavy industries and, as a result, from a
socialist-oriented path of development to a state-
capitalist style of development.
Besides the three historical documents presented at
the beginning of this chapter, there are no other official
documents that could provide us with the general princi
ples of the Algerian development strategy except the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 68
National Charter of 1976 and the speeches of the president
in which he outlined the strategy of economic development
in Algeria and the need for establishing industrializa
tion. With reference to these official documents, we can
sum up the general fundamental principles of economic
development as follows:
1. National economic and political independence,
2. Integration of the national economy,
3. Satisfaction of the total national demand,
4. The increase of employment, and
5. The construction of a socialist democratic
society.
The Algerian economic development strategy aimed at
state exploitation of national resources and control over
the economic means of production. The strategy of accel
erated industrialization — which has been in the course
of application since 1967, the first three-year plan —
originated in the assumption that Algeria was an oil and
gas producing country. The use of oil and gas revenues
was an immediate necessity in order to finance, establish,
and achieve socio-economic development. Therefore, the
country should have a "take-off" in the course of the
decade 1980-1990 and preferably before 1985. That means
the country would be able to rely more on itself and on
its own production with less dependency on foreign capi
tal .
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6 9
In regard to industrialization, the revolutionary
council in 1968 indicated that Algerian economic develop
ment must be carried out through giving priority to basic
industries and establishing heavy industry. It set three
fundamental objectives:
1. In the long run, Algeria should reach the stage
of innovation, that is the effective economic "take-off",
which would enable Algeria to carry out its own develop
ment.
2. The consumption goods of industry should be able
to satisfy the national demand.
3. The industrial sector should create 40,000 new
jobs per year.
It seemed that the Algerian government strategy of
development agreed with the Korean development strategy in
many aspects, as pointed out by M. Andre Marchal. Accord
ing to him, the construction of an independent national
economy necessitated the establishment of an industriali
zation based on heavy industry:
1. From a political point of view by the essential rupture with imperialist exploitation which is the center of the debate and the setting up of a popular government, independent of any form of foreign interference. 2. From a military point of view, it is neces sary to establish a heavy industry, in order to safeguard (militarily if it is necessary) the independence of the sovereignty against imper ialistic aggression. 3. From an economic point of view, as declared by Kim II Sung, the president of the Korean People's Republic, only heavy industry is capable of "producing and providing for the country the essential tools, raw materials,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 70
combustibles, energy and economic plants that are necessaryfor the development of our nation al economy."
In a Leninist-Stalinist scheme of economic growth,
heavy industrialization is seen as a transitional phase
towards socialism. However, if heavy industrialization is
a necessary condition, it is not a sufficient condition
for the transition towards socialism. It, therefore, must
be accompanied by a radical socialist mode of production
and relations of production. As a consequence of the lack
of this radical socialist measure, the complete break with
the Algiers Charter principles, and the abolition of the
self management system, the choice of heavy industrializa
tion did not reflect the dedication to socialist objec
tives that are stated in the previous Algerian official
documents. It was thus merely a justification of a system
which benefitted, in the first place, the nationalist
bourgeoisie. Finally, before we conclude this chapter, it
is necessary to provide a brief discussion of the question
of employment and the structure of the Algerian popula
tion.
The solution of the unemployment and underemployment
problem is among the major goals of the Algerian economic
development plan. This goal constitutes one of the main
factors against which economic development will be tested,
18 v ✓ Hammid Temmar, Structures et modele de devel- oppement de l'economie de 1 'Algerie (Alger: SNED, 1974), pp. 206-207.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 71
because employment is the key factor that determines the
success or failure of the economic development of the
country. Therefore, the satisfaction of this fundamental
need is the essential and concrete indication for the
success of development and the real transformation of the
society during this decisive stage (1966-1980).
The situation of employment in the first year after
independence was characterized by a tendency toward
unemployment and underemployment. In 1966, the male labor
force increased at a rhythm of 70,000 persons or more per
year. This rhythm exceeded 100,000 in 1973 and 140,000 in
1980. Meanwhile, the economic structure of 1966 could not
create more than a few new employment opportunities.
During the seven-year period 1966-73, the labor force
(including workers 18 to 59 years old) of those looking
for work comprised 690,000 persons with an annual average
increase of 100,000 person. During the period of the
second four-year plan (1974-77), it increased by 470,000
person with an annual average increase of 120,000. From
1978 to 1980, it increased by 890,000 persons, with an
annual average augmentation of 140,000 persons per year.
The female labor force increased by only 50,000
persons during the same seven years (1966-73). During the
period of the second four-year plan (1974-77) , the male
labor force in the agricultural economy did not increase
more than 85,000 compared with 385,000 in the non-
agricultural economy.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 72
The slight improvement in creating new jobs was a
result of the implementation of the first and second
four-year plans. The number of jobs created by the
development of non-agricultural activities was 480,000, of
which 330,000 were created during the first four-year plan
(1970-1973).
In general, during the period 1966-77, changes in the
structure of the active population remained modest. It is
also evident from the following table that the number of
the active population was increasing very slowly. While
the percentage of unemployment in the urban areas was
decreasing, the opposite was true concerning the rural
areas where the number of underemployed people grew.
The more important role of industry — making jobs
available — was a new element of the employment policy
that began with the second four-year plan (1974-77) .
Ideally, the number of jobs to have been created during
the period of the second plan was 450,000 in the non-
agricultural sector, with an annual progress rhythm of 8
percent.
In the industrial sector, the achievement of employ
ment objectives was dependent upon the implementation of
the actual units of production in the construction materi
al, metallurgical, and petrochemical industries. The
growth of the population employed in industrial activities
was 1,950,000 in 1977 compared with 1,400,000 in 1973,
with an augmentation of more than 38 percent.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 7 3
TABLE 9
EMPLOYED, UNEMPLOYED AND ACTIVE POPULATION, 1966-77 (In Thousands)
1966 1969 1976 1977
Total population 11,820 13,200 16,700 17,200 Active population 2,565 2,912 3,590 3,740 Active urban population 1,017 1,212 2,055 2,195 Unemployed 33 30% 10% 8% Active rural population 1,548 1,698 1,535 1,545 Underemployed 40-43% 50% 63% 63%
' 0 SOURCE: M.E. Benissad, Economie du developpement de l'Algerie 1962-1978 (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 254.
According to the 1966 census, the total population in
the agricultural sector was estimated at 6,300,000 per
sons. The active labor force was 1,270,000, of which
970,000 were between 18 and 59 years old. Among the
active labor force, only 450,000 had permanent jobs
(170,000 in the self-managed sector, and 280,000 in the
private sector). The remaining 820,000 were seasonal
workers in the agricultural sector.
At the end of the second four-year plan (1977), the
introduction of the agrarian revolution also improved the
revenue and employment situation of 50,000 peasants
organized in new cooperatives. The application of the
second four-year plan (1974-77) was marked by an essential
augmentation of employment in the agricultural sector by
20 percent. But we have to understand that the second
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 74
plan did not solve the problem of unemployment in the
country. The real objective was to create more than one
million new jobs by 1980.
During the period 1978-1980, the conditions were not
favorable for creating the necessary employment because of
the absence of an existing plan as well as the disruption
of the political system caused by the death of President
Boumediene. The growth of new jobs during this period was
supposed to exceed the annual rhythm of more than 11
percent (against 7.5% achieved during the seven years
1966-73, and 8% during the second plan, 1974-77). The new
economic structure of 1980, therefore, was supposed to
create more than 200,000 jobs per year in order to satisfy
the needs of the increased number of young people entering
the labor market.
Algeria thus suffered from high unemployment and
underemployment (50-25% of the labor force) during the
immediate post-independence period. The growth of unem
ployment in the rural area brought about a labor force
movement to the urban industrial area. Although employ
ment in agriculture was stagnant, the agricultural sector
in Algeria continued to be important as a source of
employment (it employs 30% of the labor force) , food,
foreign exchange, and potential growth. Still its rela
tive importance declined as other sectors developed more
rapidly.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 75
The structure of the Algerian population is charac
terized by two dominant factors: a high annual rate of
growth and a young population. The 1966 census estimated
the population of Algeria to be 11,820,000 persons. The
evolution of the population (including immigrants) during
the seven years 1966-1973 raised it to an estimated
14,700,000 persons, with an average annual growth rate of
3.4 percent. In 1977, the population was estimated at
17,200,000. In 1980 the population was 18,524,000 (see
Table 10).
TABLE 10
POPULATION EVOLUTION (Millions)
Year Population
1954 9,530 1960 9,602 1966 11,820 1967 12,567 1968 12,951 1969 13,200 1970 13,749 1971 14,178 1972 14,495 1973 15,065 1974 15,534 1975 16,016 1976 16,700 1977 17,200 1978 17,624 1980 18,524 1982 20,300 1984 21,200
SOURCE: Previous tables and Jacques Schnetz- ler, Le developpement alge'rien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 12; QER 1 (1984,1985):2; Ministere de la planification, Statistigues 1967-68 (Alger: Direction des statistiques et de la comptabilite nationale, 1980), pp. 2-4.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 76
The share of young population (less than 18 years of
age) in the total population was 52.8 percent in 1966;
54.5 percent in 1973; and 54.2 percent in 1977 and 1980.
This is an important indicator for the size of the inac
tive population in Algeria. Table 11 shows the population
structure of Algeria by age groups.
TABLE 11
POPULATION STRUCTURE BY AGE GROUPS
Years 1966 1973 1977 1980
00-17 52.8 54.5 54.2 54.2 18-59 40.7 39.3 40.1 40.3 60 and above 6.5 6.2 5.7 5.5
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
SOURCE: Secretariat d'Etat au Plan, II Plan Quadriennal 1974-1977 (Alger: Imprimerie Offi- cielle, 1974), p. 50.
During the seven years 1966-73, 39 percent of the
total population lived in urban and semi-urban areas, and
61 percent lived in rural areas. The structure of the
population during the second four-year plan 1974-1977 was
as follows: 42 percent of the total population lived in
the urban and semi-urban areas, and 58 percent lived in
the rural areas. The significance of this evolution
resides essentially in the increasing demand for urban
jobs. The movement of the rural population toward the
cities (excluding the rural movement toward foreign
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 77
countries, i.e., France) during 1966-1973 was estimated at
840,000 persons. During the period of the second four-
year plan (1974-1977) the growth of the urban population
was 1,360,000 persons. This growth was due to the natural
growth of the urban and semi-urban population, and to a
rural migration toward urban areas.
Conclusion
Generally speaking, we can conclude that the social
ist option under both the Ben Bella and Boumediene regimes
was compromised in many respects. First, it was compro
mised by the continuous violation of the socialist princi
ples stated in the official revolutionary documents;
second, it was compromised from the beginning by eliminat
ing the workers' participation in political and economic
decision making; third and finally, it was compromised by
the choice of a development policy that sacrificed employ
ment generation for capitalist industrial development.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER IV
CONSTRUCTION OF THE POST-INDEPENDENCE ECONOMY
In this chapter, we will discuss the structure of the
post-independence economy. We will discuss the period of
economic transition, the new industrial doctrine, and
finally provide a comparison between the private, public,
and self-management sectors.
The Period of Transition (1962-1966)
According to the Algiers Charter, the transition
period was a necessary stage in realizing the material and
social conditions of socialism. The Charter defined the
transitional period as follows:
The period of transition is when the political organization of the society prepares for social ism, starting with the abolition of the exploi tation of man by man, the establishment of the material and social bases for a rapid develop ment of the forces of production, and the freeing of the workers' creative activity.
The Charter also indicated that
In the period of transition, the country must solve the contradiction between town and country side and therefore must work to unite the poor peasantry with the workers of the towns and
The text of The Algiers Charter as an Appendix to Ian Clegg, Workers' Self-Management in Algeria (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971) p. 218.
78
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 7 9
realize one of the most important conditions for the victory of socialism.
However, following independence, the existing social
forces failed to achieve a sound economic development
during the period 1962-1966. To understand why the public
and self-managed sectors did not develop, and why this
period was conceived of as a period of economic stagna
tion, we have to analyze the political, economic, and
financial situation, as well as the situation of different
social forces.
At the political level, it is obvious that the state
was new and needed to establish its proper administration
and political institutions. It tried to regulate economic
activities such as foreign trade, the foreign oil compa
nies, and the management of the agricultural sector.
There was no clear economic doctrine to be followed in
undertaking economic development. In regard to the
self-management or autogestion sector, though the Summam
congress had admitted the principle of a "radical agrarian
reform," the Tripoli Programme "the collectivity of the
means of production," and the Algiers Charter that "auto
gestion is the basic principle of this society," the state
had pursued the policy of managing the self-managed
sector. In practice, and generally speaking, the sector
^Ibid., p. 212.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8 0
3 of agriculture continued to live under anarchy. Until
the end of this period, the autogestion sector was limited
to small enterprises playing a marginal role in economic
activities. In other words, it was composed of almost 330 4 small and weak enterprises using 3000 workers in 1964.
This shows that the large foreign companies continued
their industrial activities and were not nationalized, for
example, "Renault and Berliet" in automobile construction;
"Durafour" for metallic construction; "SNAP" for iron
material; "Neyrpic" for mechanical construction; "ALTEMEL,
CABLAF, and PHILIPS for electric construction; "SOTUBAL
and ALTUMEL" for pipes, and finally "ALLUMAF" for
laminating and aluminum transformation. However, in the
metallurgy of steel, mechanic, and electrical industrial
branches, only a few important enterprises were abandoned
and put in the industrial autogestion sector, such as
"ACILOR" in Oran, and "ENCM" in Rouiba. It was mainly the
small enterprises of individual entrepreneurs with weak
capital and providing low salaries that were nationalized
in this period. The food, construction material, and wood
industries were the main domain of these small enterpris
es. They belonged to French entrepreneurs who abandoned
3 ' M.E. Benissad, Economie du developpement de 1 'Algerie (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 7. 4 ' A. Benachenhou, Planification et developpement en Algerie 1962-1980 (Alger: CREA, 1980), p. 15.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 81
them at independence for the benefit of the industrial
autogestion sector. According to Temmar, during this
period (1962-1966) , Algerian industry was mainly made up
of light industrial concerns. It was oriented toward the
production of consumer goods. The industries created in
this period were as follows: textiles, five projects;
leather and tannery, two projects; shoes, four projects; 5 and food industries, three projects.
Likewise, in the public (state) sector, economic
doctrine was still vague. The creation of a national
company, SONATRACH, in 1963, was not seen as a means to
compete with foreign capital, but was simply to undertake
some vital projects which the foreign companies refused to
undertake, such as the construction of new pipelines for
developing oil production.
At the economic level, despite the political indepen
dence of Algeria, the country was still completely depen
dent. Consequently, the economic situation was charac
terized by low productivity in agriculture, weak capacity
of accumulation, disorganized management, and finally and
more important a domination of foreign companies over the
main production, oil and gas, which was guaranteed by the
Evian agreements during the transitional period of the
country.
5 ' ' , H . Temmar, Structures et modele de developpement de l'economie de l'Algerie (Alger: SNED, 1974), p. 218.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 82
If we take a look at the budget situation and expen
ditures shown in Table 12, we will find that the slight
increase of revenues at the end of this period was due to
the increase of oil production and the increased demand
for the social and economic infrastructural equipment.
TABLE 12
BUDGET REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES OF 1963-1966 (Unit = 10 DA)
1963 1964 1965 1966
Final budget revenues 3,289 3,200 3,038 3,517 Expenditures of operations 2,237 2,070 2,757 2,846 Saving budget 1,052 1,130 281 671 Expenditures of equipment 434 741 492 945 Deficit + 618 + 389 - 211 - 174
SOURCE: A. Benachenhou, Planification et developpe- ment en Alqerie 1962-1980 (Alger: CREA, 1980), p. 19.
The employment situation is worse. The census of
1966 sheds some light on this matter (see Table 13). We
must keep the decline of unemployment in perspective:
statistics do not take into account the 260,000 workers
who sought jobs for the first time, 180,000 of them in
agriculture; neither do the statistics include the con
siderable number of unemployed females in the cities,
since the definition of the "active labor force" here
excludes females of working age; nor do they take into
account children under 18 years old.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8 3
TABLE 13
EMPLOYMENT AND UNDEREMPLOYMENT IN 1966 (Millions of persons)
Agriculture Other Total
Population 6,300 5,520 11,820 Active labor forces 1,300 1,180 2,480 Population employed 870 850 1,720 Population unemployed 430 330 760 Rate of unemployment 33% 28% 30.6%
SOURCE: A. Benachenhou, Planification et developpement en Algerie 1962-80 (Alger: CREA, 1980) , p. 20.
In terms of the employed population/ the rate of
underemployment is very important. More than three-
fourths of 530,000 agricultural wage-earners were seasonal
workers. As a result of the demographic growth and
economic stagnation during this period, the social and
economic conditions of the great majority of the Algerian
population had not changed. Capital accumulation in the
hydrocarbons sector did not affect the rest of the econo
my; work conditions for the general population did not
improve.
The country remained financially dependent on foreign
sources in carrying out its economic development in both
the self-management and public sectors. The state had
insufficient financial resources, because the key produc
tive resources of the country, oil and gas, were still in
the hands of French companies. The main accumulation of
productive capital was achieved by the foreign firms in
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 84
the hydrocarbons sector which received almost 60 percent
out of the total investments of enterprises for this
period. Despite this, the volume of investment in the
hydrocarbons sector did not witness a considerable growth
during this period; the French oil companies felt unsecure
and continued to export their capital back to France. The
lack of accumulation in the public sector was due to the’
absence of important financial means. For the whole
period, the investment in the industrial public sector was
equal to 900 millions of dinars which constituted only 12
percent out of a total of 7,100 million investments in the
productive sector. Almost 60 percent of this investment
came from foreign companies and went to the hydrocarbon
sector.®
However, all these political, economic, and financial
facts alone cannot explain entirely the phenomenon of
economic stagnation and the absence of a dynamic develop
ment in this period. The fundamental factor, and the most
important, is the absence of integrated social forces
capable of promoting a real economic and industrial
development. Although the foreign bourgeoisie could not
claim any political power, without doubt its economic
domination was still strong. The activity of foreign
capital was protected by the Evian agreements. This
6 / A. Benachenhou, Planification et developpement, p. 21.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 85
determined the monopoly of French companies over the
hydrocarbons sector. In fact, during this period, the
hydrocarbons sector constituted the privileged place for
the implantations of the foreign bourgeoisie. The local
bourgeoisie, a potential source of bourgeois ideology
hostile to socialism, filled a more important position in
agriculture, retail trade, and the main technical admini
strative and intellectual grades. This bureaucratic
bourgeoisie was rapidly forming in the machinery of the
administration, the state, and the economy. This is due
to the fact that the Algerian state maintained the admin
istrative structures established by colonialism when it
was called to assume an economic role.
As a consequence of the decline of agricultural
production, the absence of radical, integrated social
forces, the lack of financial sources, the dependency on
foreign capital, the high rate of unemployment, and
ultimately foreign control of the key resources of produc
tion oil and gas, stagnation struck the Algerian economy,
and the state failed to foster sound economic development.
Economic progress could not be achieved only by slight
growth in industrial production and by putting into
operation the industrial projects of the Constantine plan.
In fact, the large projects of the Constantine plan, such
as the "Siderurgie de Annaba" and the primary transforma
tion of hydrocarbons did not fundamentally change the
social and economic conditions of the country. The French
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 86
companies still monopolized the market for the equipment,
the production, and the transportation of products of this
sector. We can conclude that the political economic
situation, the financial system, and the social forces
were not prepared for establishing a strong economic
development after independence. The Algiers Charter
admitted that "during this period [transitional period] it
is impossible to create immediately a situation any better 7 than the one the country inherited."
The New Industrial Doctrine (1966-1969)
Despite the clarity of the ideas of the Algiers
Charter, it did not reflect the economic and political
situation in Algeria between 1962 and 1965. Only since
1966 did the Algerian model of economic growth receive its
final formulation and was carried out to some extent by
coherent policies of investment. A brief analysis of the
distribution of investment since the beginning of the
first three-year Plan (1967-1969) indicates that Algeria
has adopted a new industrial doctrine. This new doctrine
lay in the establishment of heavy industry as a precondi
tion for achieving a sound and independent economic
development. This new tendency manifested itself in state
action which established two main goals: (1) the libera
tion of the economy from foreign dependency and the
7 The Algiers Charter, in Clegg, Workers' Self- Management, p. 220.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8 7
recuperation of national wealth; and (2) the construction
of a strong national economy in general and Algerian heavy
industry in particular.
The socio-economic and political guidelines of the
period 1966-1969 are explained and justified in President
Boumediene's speeches and in the different Charters (the
Algiers Charter, 1964, and the National Charter, 1976).
According to Boumediene, "development [is the] condition
...of social, cultural, and economic progress, and the
national independence to which the Algerian people are
O deeply attached." In 1968, the revolutionary council
announced that the economic development of Algeria should
give priority to heavy industry. It defined three funda
mental objectives:
1. In the long term (horizon 1980), Algeria should
attain the stage of innovation. This implies the immedi
ate launching of heavy industry and ■'-he production of the
means of production
2. The consumption goods industry must be able to
satisfy national demands by then
3. The industrial sector must create 40,000 new jobs
per year
In order to achieve these objectives, two fundamental
conditions must be fulfilled:
8 Discours du President Boumediene, Vol. VIII (Algiers: SNED, 1979) p. 63.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 88
1. A large increase in the production of steel,
fertilizers, energy and cement
2. The production of the means of production within
national boundaries. By means of production is meant,
concretely, tractors, trucks, agricultural machines, and
machine-tools
When these conditions are fulfilled, the consumption goods
industries can be created. However, the consumption goods
industries cannot come into existence by themselves, but
must be brought about by:
1. The implantation of the metallurgical and petro
chemical industries (heavy industry)
2. The development of the mechanical industries upon
which the development of the agricultural sector depends
The largest part of investment during this period was
devoted to heavy industry, which constituted 89 percent of
total industrial investment, as Table 14 indicates.
There is no doctrinal text enabling us to identify
the main elements of the industrialization policy which
was started after 1966. It is only in the speeches of
President Boumediene that the elements of the new indus
trial doctrine can be found. These elements constituted a
new approach to the phenomenon of industrialization.
Industrialization has two major strategic dimensions:
political and economic.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 89
TABLE 14
DISTRIBUTION OF INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT, 1967-1969 (Unit = 10 DA)
1967 % 1968 % 1969 % Total %
Heavy industry 655 83 1,621.5 93 1,933 90 4,209.5 89.5 Consumption goods industries 115 14 109 6 171 8 395 8.5 Other light industries 28 3 24 1 56 2 108 2
Total 798 100 1,754.5 100 216 100 4,712.5 100
SOURCE: H . Temmar , Structures et Modele de Developpe- ment de 1 'e'conomie de 1 'Alge'rie (Alger: SNED, 1974) , p. 222.
Politically, industrialization is a condition for the
liberation of the Third World from the imperialistic
control exercised upon it by the advanced countries.
President Boumediene said:
Our policy is based upon the industrialization of the country and the construction of a nation al economy which excludes all forms of exploita tion.... The construction of the national economy means, after all, the recovery and the exploitation of the country's resources for the benefit of the Algerian people.
In this sense, the nationalization of French oil firms in
1970-71 was considered one of the major first steps of the
recovery of the national economy by the state. It marked
9 . Boumedienne, Discours du President Boumediene, Vol. II (Constantine: El-Baath, 1970), p. 63.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 90
the decisive phase of liberation of the Algerian economy
from dependency on the French. So the essential objec
tives of industrialization, according to President
Boumediene, are
...the increase of the national revenues, the improvement of the level of technique of the workers, the increase of employment and the widening of the national markets, which. means less dependency on the foreign markets.
Economically, industrialization is conceived as the
intersectoral integration of the national economy. The
desire to build an integrated industry is explained in
terms of the liberation from any form of dependency on the
advanced countries. The Algerian authorities believe that
the advanced countries will always try to sell their
machinery and technology at high prices in order to main
tain the inequality between the rich and the poor coun
tries. In this respect, President Boumediene said:
Industrialization will realize a symbiosis between the industrial and agricultural sectors and achieve a real complementarity within our national economy... With this industrial- agricultural complementarity, we are not only going to be able to develop our agriculture and ensure our industrialization, but we will also be able to save the foreign exchange we need in order^±o finance our imported material equip ment.
10Ibid., p. 150.
11Speech delivered by President Boumediene on the occasion of the XlVth anniversary of 1st November, 1954, cited in Bennamane, 1980, p. 69.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9 1
Industrialization is considered the key to a real
economic development. Therefore, in this period Algeria
adopted a new industrial doctrine. It is industrializa
tion in the sense that M.F. Perroux has defined it. For
him, industrialization is
a structuring of society by employing machinery in order to increase accumulatively and with decreasing individual effort, the power of human groups in obtaining the goods which are essen tial to their well-being. Industrialization is then the establishment of the process which consists of producing machines by using ma chines, such that the number of mechanical devices increases at an increasing rate and correlatively leads to a decrease in individual physical effort, therefore, a greater liberation of man from .jt^ie negative impact of the natural environment.
Accordingly, the concept of "industrializing industries"
upon which the Algerian development model is extensively
based was adopted. As a result, the experience of accel
erated industrialization which Algeria has undertaken is
often considered the best illustration of the theory of
economic development by "industrializing industries". The
initiator of this concept was the French economist M.G. de
Bernis, one of the most appreciated foreign consultants
among Algerian economic authorities. De Bernis argued
that
[for] the underdeveloped countries, the decisive fact in the industrialization process is the constitution of capital assets which are capable of feeding industry with the basic industrial
12 Temmar, Structure et Modele, p. 208.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9 2
products. Therefore, one has to start with the industries which produce the means of production and not with those which produce consumption goods.
The theory of "industrializing industries" rests on three
main features: large-scale industries, a very high
capital concentration, and production oriented toward the
means of production rather than final consumption goods.
According to de Bernis, the industrializing industries
consist of metallurgy, mechanical industries (not deriving
from metallurgy), chemical, and electro-mechanic indus
tries. According to this definition, the "industrializing
industries" are, of course, the heavy industries (les
industries de base), including the hydrocarbons indus
tries. The theory of "industrializing industries" rejects
the view of economists who advocate the necessity of
balanced growth among the different sectors of the econo
my. Although the theory of "industrializing industries"
provides us with a more operational development theory, it
does not justify the neglect of employment generation.
After the revolutionary readjustment in 1965, the
state achieved complete control of all land resources in
1966, except for the hydrocarbons sector. In 1968, 45
foreign enterprises were nationalized in order to rein
force this "statist" policy. By 1974, and due to the
, ^Jean-Claude Hazera, "Algerie: 1'Industrialisation acceleree," Les Dossiers Jeune Afrique: 1 1Industrialisa tion du Tiers Monde 3 (1975) : 118.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9 3
process of state economic expansion, all the self
management enterprises came completely under state con
trol. The state sector, or the state-firms (called
societes nationales), were created by capital provided by
the state. Authority within the state-firms was central
ized in the hands of the general director who acted on
behalf of the concerned ministry.
Besides the nationalization of the mining sector and
of heavy industries, the Algerian government also nation
alized the banking system and reorganized public finance
and foreign trade as well. In 1966, all the existing
banks were nationalized and reorganized into three major
banks:
1. The BNA (Algerian National Bank) regulates the
financial relations with the external world. It also
provides loans to private national industrialists and
agricultural self-management enterprises
2. The BEA (Algerian Foreign Bank) helps implement
export policy and provides export-oriented national
enterprises with the necessary financial means
3. The Popular Credit Bank finances industrial
mid-size and small enterprises
As a result, France was no longer the primary trade
partner of Algeria. In fact, Algeria turned all its
monetary deposits in French banks into gold and dollars in
1967-1968. This state domination of the banking system
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9 4
and reconstruction of public finance enabled the govern
ment to reorganize the foreign trade sector. It took over
foreign trade by 1969 and controlled directly or indirect
ly about 90 percent of total imports and about 80 percent 14 of total exports. Moreover, the government adopted a
new investment code in 1966. It gave financial advantages
to private national and foreign investments. For example,
it guaranteed that no nationalization will be made for at
least a period of 10 years; rights of profit transfers
were permitted. However, there remained only about 100
foreign enterprises in 1970, as compared with about 800
enterprises in 1962, representing about 15 percent of
total industrial employment and about 20 percent of the 15 turn-over of all enterprises.
The French-Algerian agreements of July 1965 improved
the oil receipts of Algeria and initiated the participa
tion of SONATRACH in development research which had been,
until then, undertaken exclusively by the French. Since
then, SONATRACH has progressively expanded its activities
to cover all the stages of oil exploitation. This econom
ic policy has led to a significant increase in the state's
financial resources and its ability to use these resources
in a relatively autonomous manner. As a consequence of
14 Aissa Bennamane, The Algerian Development Strategy and Employment Policy (London: Geo-Abstracts, 1980), p. 60. 15T. . . Ibid.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9 5
this "statist" policy, the June 19th regime realized the
most important conditions for a state-capitalist economic
development. But this capitalist development was not
adopted until 1971 when these conditions had become fully
established.
The Structure of the Post-Independence Economy
In general, the structure of the post-independence
economy is characterized by a combination of public,
private, and self-management models of production.
Therefore, we need here a concept which expresses what is
common to the three modes of production coexisting in the
Algerian social formation. That concept is the mode of
appropriation of labor. In other words, the differences
between these three modes of economy lie in the agents who
control labor. In the private sector, this control is
exercised by individuals or corporate groups. In the
public sector, it is exercised by the state; and in the
self-management sector, it is exercised, at least theoret
ically, by the workers. More specifically, Algerian
industry can be divided into three main groups according
to the mode of ownership and labor appropriation: pri
vately owned enterprises, public or state-controlled
enterprises, and self-management enterprises. In 1966,
the self-management and the public sector employed about
the same number of workers as the private sector. After
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 96
1966, the balance of employed workers has shifted in favor
of the public sector.
In the course of constructing the national economy
and establishing the basis of state-capitalist develop
ment, the government undertook several socio-economic and
political reforms. In regard to the financial system
(which was totally in French hands), the government
reorganized and controlled the whole banking system, as we
have already seen. The state also undertook a decentrali
zation policy of communes in 1967 and districts (Wilayas)
in 1969, which gave some autonomy in socio-economic
matters to the different regions of the country. But
these regions were still under direct control of the state
in terms of political and economic decisions. Moreover,
the government established a new policy of "special
programmes." These special programs aimed at improving
the local socio-economic infrastructure such as hospitals,
schools, and roads in the different regions, reducing the
gaps in living standards between regions, and building a
national, homogenous economy.
Although control over the national and foreign
markets by the state led to a state monopoly over the
import and export of products, this did not abolish the
different levels of private trade in the country, such as
wholesale, half-wholesale, and retail commerce. Redefini
tion of the price system, in order to furnish the popula
tion with basic commodities such as bread, sugar, and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 9 7
coffee for fixed prices, aimed at protecting national
prices from international inflation. The state also
provided a democratic system of education based on the
principle "basic education is obligatory," which was
adopted in 1974-1975. That meant putting a maximum number
of children in school, and giving the people access to the
different levels of education: primarily, secondary, and
higher education. The state also adopted a free medical
policy in 1974. As a result, all hospitals and medical
centers became part of the public sector and now were
directly under state control.
Finally, although the agricultural revolution is
expressed fully by the Tripoli Programme and the Algiers
Charter, the new agrarian policy which was implemented in
1971 was not reflected. This new agrarian policy called
for limiting the private property, abolishing absenteeism,
giving the new nationalized land to peasants, organizing
the peasants into cooperatives of production, constructing
one thousand agricultural villages, and creating coopera
tives of services. This new policy has affected, to some
extent, the nature of social relations, particularly in
the rural areas.
Private Sector
The 7.2 million hectares under private ownership
constitute the traditional or private sector, in which
some 500,000 hectares were bought by Algerians from
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 98
Europeans. Algeria's cultivable land looked like this in
1964.
TABLE 15
CULTIVABLE LAND IN 1964 (Hectares)
Land under autogestion 2.300.000 Private ownership 7.200.000 Communal and state domain 9.500.000
SOURCE: This table constructed from data pro vided in John Waterbury, Land, Man, and Develop ment in Algeria: Problems of Trained Manpower, Industry and Agriculture (American Universities Field Staff, North Africa Series Vol. XVII, No. 1, 1973), p. 10.
The major characteristic of the private sector is
that it is totally dependent on inconsistent rainfall, and
supports about half of the Algerian population. This
private sector is geared to producing only for the nation
al market. In the first six years after independence, the
annual harvest was between 9-10 million quintals (100
kilograms), a level no higher than that of the 1870s. In
fact, since the 1960s the Algerian population has been to
some extent dependent on grain imported from the United
States. On average, the self-consumption in the private
sector runs at about 50 percent of total produce, while it
is only about 10 percent in the self-management sector.
Table 16 gives us a good picture of the size and number of
holdings.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 99
TABLE 16
DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATELY-OWNED LAND BY SIZE OF HOLDINGS
Hectares Number of holdings Percent
1 110,000 19 2-10 340,000 52 11-50 170,000 26 51-100 16,000 2.5 101 + 8,450 1.3
Total 644,450 100
SOURCE: John Waterbury, Land, Man, and Devel opment in Algeria: Problems of Trained Manpower, Industry and Agriculture (American Universities Field Staff, North Africa Series Vol. XVII, No. 1, 1973), p. 11.
According to this table, about 71 percent of all private
holdings are 10 hectares or less, occupying only 21
percent of the privately cultivated land.
Within the private sector, there are two main social
classes: the new petty bourgeoisie, which owns the means
of production and controls the labor force, and the
working class, which neither owns the means nor control
the labor process. The private enterprises are usually
managed by the entrepreneurial petty bourgeoisie. The
rush for land abandoned or sold off by Europeans after
1962 led to the formation of this new rural petty bour
geoisie. Many owners resided in the cities, engaging in
commerce, private enterprises, and the state bureaucracy.
Not only did they draw revenues from land they did not
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100
themselves farm, but they also used to run and market the
production. It was estimated in 1967 that as much as one
million hectares might have been owned by absentees.
This is why the agrarian revolution considered the
following objectives:
1. To fix privately owned land
2. To put an end to absentee ownership of land
through application of the principle "the land to those
who work it"
3. To end private ownership of water sources
4. To end systems of indivision in property owner
ship
5. To abolish sharecropping (Khammasa) and tenant
farming
6. To nationalize communal and tribal land and
religious property
7. To establish a national land bank for distribut
ing the land to poor peasants
Table 17 shows us the general distribution of privately
owned land according to the categories mentioned above.
Agricultural growth has largely occurred in the
private sector producing vegetables, fruit, milk, and meat
for which prices could not be effectively controlled and
for which there was an uncontrollable private market.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 101
TABLE 17
DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
Category Hectares Percent
Direct cultivation by owner 4,114,650 70.5 Indivision property 1,213,050 20.8 Tribally owned land 2,300,000 — Communally owned land 9,500,000 — Tenancy 162,195 2.8 Khammasa 31,780 .5 Others 317,985 5.4
SOURCE: John Waterbury, Land, Man, and Development in Algeria: Problems of Trained Manpower, Industry and Agri culture (American Universities Field Staff, North Africa Series Vol. XVII, No. 1, 1973), p. 12.
Since 1980, the tendency toward promoting the private
sector has become very clear; 7.5 million hectares offi
cially classified as usable land was retaken by the
private sector.^ In 1983, the government passed a law
which aimed at encouraging indigenous people to buy and
sell land and to apply for bank credits to use the land.
As a consequence, many bourgeois and entrepreneurs have
taken advantage of the 1983 law and benefitted from the
Chadli regime's "liberalization." This reflects the
elevated status of the private sector. It also means that
government is doing all it can to promote and develop the
private sector, but not at the expense of the state
*^Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria 2 (London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 1985): 16.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 102
sector. The state still dominates Algeria's economy and
maintains its monopoly of foreign trade.
Self-Management or Autogestion Sector
Algeria became engaged in a very important economic
policy called self-management or autogestion. The term
autogestion corresponds to the idea of free management or
autonomous administration. This new system of autogestion
was established in rural and urban areas. Ideologically,
autogestion constituted the most original feature of
socialism under the Ben Bella regime. This regime accu
rately perceived autogestion as the main factor for deter
mining the success or failure of Algerian socialism. The
political bureau formulated a self-management system in
all enterprises, whether industrial or agricultural. The
concept of a worker self-management system was borrowed in
general terms from Yugoslavia. The government adapted
this model to the particular socio-economic conditions of
Algerian society, and so far the heart of Algerian social
ism has been the system of self-management. In addition
to the workers' participation in the direction of the
enterprise, there is their right to share in the profit.
The self-managed enterprises, according to the
Algiers Charter, were to be managed by their workers
through four bodies: the director, the Workers' General
Assembly, the Workers' Council, and the Management Commit
tee.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 0 3
The director of the enterprise is appointed by the
state. He represents the state within the enterprise and
assures the legality of its operations, as well as their
conformity with the national development plan. He con
trols the treasury, and under the authority of the presi
dent of the Management Committee directs the daily opera
tions. In case of conflict between the director of the
enterprise and one of the self-management bodies, the
Communal Council must decide. The Communal Council is
composed of the presidents of the Management Committees of
all the self-managed enterprises in the Commune plus
representatives of the party (FLN), the labor union
(UGTA), the army (ANP), and the communal administrative
authorities.
The Workers' General Assembly is composed of the
regular laborers in a given enterprise. The main tasks of
the Workers' Assembly are to adopt the enterprise's annual
plans for production, to buy new equipment and market
production, to check the accounting, and to decide the
distribution of tasks among the workers. It elects a
Workers' Council.
The Workers' Council is a body that includes at least
two-thirds of the workers in a given enterprise. It
duplicates many of the functions of the General Assembly
but has more direct control over the management. The
council serves a three-year term and selects three to
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 0 4
eleven of its members to form the self-management commit
tee.
The Management Committee is responsible for the
general running of the enterprise. It is composed of
three to eleven cadres who will draw up the budget and all
plans to be submitted to the vote of the General Assembly
and Council. The Management Committee also has the power
to make decisions concerning short-term loans, marketing,
and buying of equipment and materials. It elects a
president, who is supposed to call and preside over all
meetings of the Assembly, Council, and Management Commit
tee. The president is to be elected annually, while the
members of the other bodies are elected for three-year
terms.
Although theoretically self-management has often been
advanced as a solution to alienated labor in that the
workers are given the opportunity to exert control over
the process of production, in practice the supervisory
state agency and directors of enterprises make the crucial
choices. Likewise, the role prescribed for the director
makes him more powerful than the president of the workers,
under whose authority he theoretically stands. The
General Assembly of the enterprise does not have the power
to make decisions; it simply endorses rather than controls
decisions made within the enterprise. The supervisory
state agency, by appointing directors, deprives workers of
any power over the functioning of their own enterprises.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 0 5
Because of the state's intervention, the self
management sector encountered several problems. For
example, financing was entrusted by a June 1964 decree to
the B.C.A. (Banque Centrale d'Algerie) and the C.A.D.
(Caise Algeriene de Developpement). The former was meant
to finance short-term loans, to control the management of
enterprises, and to participate in the elaboration of
plans and programs. The latter was formed to grant
long-term loans and make capital liquid. In fact, neither
the B.C.A. nor the C.A.D. solved the financial problems
encountered by self-management enterprise committees.
Both the B.C.A. and C.A.D. made weak contributions to
self-management. The nature of the difficulties encoun
tered in the application of the self-management model
illustrate the struggle between various political forces,
between the functional and the structural levels within
the self-management enterprises, and within the adminis
tration. We can share Clegg's claim that
[each] successive stage in this process placed the committees more firmly under central control until the administration came to control every essential aspects of the economic activity of the committee, rendering the concept of auto gestion derisory.
The administration not only held all the funds, but kept
the accounts and itself paid for all financial transac
tions of the committees, including wages. The self-
17 Clegg, Workers' Self-Management, p. 66.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 0 6
management committees were allowed a small amount of petty
cash for day-to-day needs. Thus, in financial terms, this
strict control by the administration meant that the
economic future of the self-management enterprises was no
longer in the workers hands. This was especially true in
the field of credits or loans to industrial enterprises.
As a result, productivity among the self-management
enterprises was decreased in this period (1963-1965) ,
because of state control of sales, profits, and credit.
Most of the committees within self-management enterprises
were unable to fulfill their obligations, since their
budgets were in the hands of the state agencies. Even
after this period, the productivity of the self-management
sector continued to be less than that of the private
sector. The causes appeared to be that guaranteed salar
ies were received by the employees of self-management
units regardless of farm performance or of an individual's
performance. Farm losses were covered by government
transfers. Stagnation of production in the self
management sector was the result.
After 1966, although Boumediene acknowledged the
existence of "enemies" of the self-management form of
economic organization, he blamed the workers for their low
productivity and declared the self-management must conform
to the law and submit to control. So he shifted the blame
for the failure of self-management from the "saboteur
cadres" to the workers. However, if we know that various
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 0 7
management committees had from the very beginning been
under the high control of the administration or the
director appointed by it, and that the administration
managed both the finances of the committees and the
marketing of their products, it seems untrue to claim that
workers were unable to manage nationally and profitably
the concerns they had taken over.
As we have seen, despite the revolutionary commitment
to the principle of effective participation by the workers
in their enterprises, this principle was never extended to
the top managers of the economy, to the party, or to the
state. There was thus a clear contradiction between a
system of production theoretically and formally controlled
by the workers and an administration that totally escaped
their control.
However, the experience of self-management in Algeria
made the workers even more aware of the conflict between
the top managers and bureaucrats and themselves. At the
congress of the socialist industrial sector workers made
their voice heared and accused the administration of
impeding the functioning and the experience of self
management. What was the role of the Workers Union
(U.G.T.A.) in the process of distracting self-management?
The answer is obvious: the Union's role was very limited
because of its history of being controlled by the party
(FLN) or the state. It still suffered from a lack of
autonomy, manifested in its inability to provide workers
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 0 8
with an adequate platform for expressing their interests.
As a consequence, most of the self-management enterprises
committees were blocked, unable to make a profit without
loans, and unable to get a loan without making profit. By
applying financial criteria, the administration effec
tively blocked the development of the entire self
management sector. According to QER, based on El-
Moudjahid, only 682 out of 3,200 self-managed farms made a
profit in 1983-84; this was an improvement over the 18 1982-83 figure of only 398 farms.
State agency/director
General Assembly
Workers 1 Council
Management Committee
Figure 1. Organizational Structure of the Self-Management Sector
18 Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria 1 (1985): 7.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 0 9
Public or State Sector
The public or state sector is usually managed by
state agencies or directors. It consists of enterprises
nationalized by the government since independence, sub
national enterprises, and new enterprises created with the
aid of foreign loans such as the Draa Ben Khedda textile
enterprise, and the Annaba steel complex. In fact, the
Annaba steel complex consists of four different compo
nents: its blast-furnaces are French, its steel-works are
Russian, its flattening-mills are Italian, and its pipe
line works are West German.
The industrial public enterprises were taken over by
the state in different forms. First, in the form of
reconstructing the existing enterprises such as the
"Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Algeriens"; second,
nationalizing or repurchasing foreign active enterprises,
changing their former names such as "Societe Nationale
d'Exploitation et de Recherches Miniers" in the place of
small foreign enterprises of mineral exploitation; and
third, creating new enterprises such as the "Societe
Nationale des Industries de la Cellulose." In this
respect, the most important historical decision was that
of February 1971, when the nationalization of 51 percent
of oil and 100 percent of natural gas took place.
Within the state controlled sector, there are three
social classes: (1) the bourgeoisie, the top managers and
directors, those who make up the core of the governing
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 110
bureaucrats; (2) the new petit-bourgeoisie, comprised of
technicians and engineers and those who have high educa
tion and skills; and (3) the proletariat of manual working
class.
Thus, we will have the following social organization
and structure in the public sector.
Top managers/directors
Technicians, engineers, intellectuals
Working class
Figure 2. Structure of Public Sector
Conclusion; The Algerian Social Class Structure
The colonization of Algeria brought about the divi
sion of society into two antagonistic classes: a colonial
bourgeoisie monopolizing the means of production and a
proletariat. Moreover, a lumpenproletariat, which served
the function of a colonial reserve army, came into exist
ence. Before independence, the Algerian social formation
showed different ideological tendencies, which have
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Ill
determined the present Algerian socio-economic and politi
cal system. We can distinguish between three major
ideological tendencies:
1. The neo-colonial tendency, represented mainly by
the interests of the French metropolis and one category of
the indigenous capitalists who came to identify their
interests with the interests of France
2. The indigenous capitalist tendency, represented
particularly by the large landowners, the traditional
indigenous bourgeoisie, and in general those who were
opposed to neo-colonialism but who were naturally opposed
to any form of socialism
3. An orientation toward complete independence of
Algeria. It advocated socialist principles and called for
the abolition of capitalism.
After the independence of the country, the major
split between the conflicting classes was between the
socialist forces and the emergent national bourgeois and
bureaucratic forces that had come to dominate the state.
Each of these social classes was divided into two major
social groups:
1. Those who believed in a radical Marxist system
for the country were divided between those who favored a
central state-controlled socialist system and those who
were for a democratic socialist system with a correspond
ing socialist organization
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 112
2. The anti-socialist forces, who believed in the
specific Arabic identity of Algeria, were split between
those who wanted a free enterprise system and those who
wanted some form of state control of the market
The interests of the two main social classes (socialist
forces and bourgeoisie) are contradictory. While the
national bourgeoisie was interested in the capital-
intensive industries in order to speed up its economic
enrichment and strengthen its political power, the social
ists advocated labor-intensive industries in order to
provide employment for the working classes.
At this point, we can maintain that within the
present Algerian social formation, there are three main
social classes:
1. The bourgeoisie, the top managers and directors,
those who make up the core of the governing bureaucrats
and hold the key to socio-economic and political power in
the country
2. The new petty bourgeoisie, comprised of techni
cians, engineers, intellectuals, and those who have high
levels of education and skills. This new social class is
a product of the industrialization process taking place in
Algeria. It includes those who started their careers as
professionals and technocrats and then moved up in the
social hierarchy to become petty-bourgeois, participating
directly or indirectly in the socio-economic decision
making with the national bourgeoisie
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 1 3
3. The proletariat, which includes both white-collar
and blue-collar or manual working masses
We can summarize the Algerian social classes as follows:
Bourgeoisie (Top managers and directors)
New Petty-Bourgeoisie (Technicians, engineers, intellectuals)
Working class (Mental and manual working masses)
Figure 3. Algerian Social Class Structure
In determining these social classes, we used Nicos
Poulantzas' definition. According to Poulantzas, the top
managers who have economic possession are part of the
bourgeois class. Economic possession means the capacity
of putting the means of production into operation. In
other words, the top managers who have control over both
the means of production and the labor force are part of
the bourgeoisie. The new petty bourgeoisie, according to
Poulantzas, consists of the technicians, the engineers,
and the intellectuals, who are partly entrusted with a
special authority in controlling the labor process.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 1 4
Therefore, they cannot be considered part of the working
class, even when they take the working class side; their
place in political and ideological relations is not 19 reducible to their class position in the conjuncture.
We also use here Erik Wright's definition of the working
class, because Poulantzas' definition of the working class
is limited only to the productive labor who produce
surplus value, whereas Wright places both productive and
unproductive labor (white collar employees) in the working
class.20
19 . Nicos Poulantzas, Classes in Contemporary Capital ism (London: Verso, 1978), pp. 14-24. 20 Erik Olin Wright, Class, Crisis and the State (London: Verson, 1979), pp 46-63.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. C H A P TE R V
HYDROCARBONS INDUSTRIES
Introduction
Activity in the hydrocarbons (oil, gas and petrochem
icals) sector is very recent in Algeria. It was not until
the late 1950s that hydrocarbons activities and research
began under the control of four French companies created
especially for this purpose: SN REPAL (La Societe Nation
ale de Recherche et d'Exploitation des Petroles en
Algerie), CFP (La Compagnie Francaise des Petroles), CREPS
(La Compagnie des Petroles d'Algerie). From 1957 to 1962,
twenty-three new companies with French and foreign capital
(Shell, BP, Esso) joined the previous French companies in
the hydrocarbons field. From 1954 to 1962, a reserve of
600 million tons of oil and 1,600 billion cubic meters of
natural gas were discovered. More precisely, it was only
in 1958 that the country began to produce oil and in 1960
to produce natural gas. After independence in 1963, the
national company SONATRACH (Societe Nationale de Transport
et the Commercialisation des Hydrocarbons) was estab
lished. By 1966, SONATRACH extended its activities to
other fields in the oil and gas industries.
115
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 116
Until 1967, almost the entire production of hydro
carbons was under the control of foreign firms such as
Getty Oil, Sinclair, and other French oil companies.
Despite difficulties brought about by political and
economic conflicts of interest during the initial years
after independence, a normalization of Algerian-French
relations was reached in 1965 as a result of an accord
signed by Ben Bella with the French. The accord allowed
the French to participate actively in the industrializa
tion of Algeria through an office created specifically for
this purpose (Office de Cooperation Industrielle).
The hydrocarbons sector is comprised of the following
main activities:
1. Exploration of hydrocarbons resources
2. Production and transportation of crude oil
3. Preliminary transformation of hydrocarbons:
liquefaction, refining, and petrochemicals
4. Further transformation: raw material for deter
gents, synthetic fibers, and fertilizers
5. Distribution of hydrocarbons and their deriva
tives in the national and international markets.
The hydrocarbons sector contains one large company,
SONATRACH. Government decree No. 63-491, published on
December 31,1963, empowered SONATRACH to carry out all
transport and marketing of hydrocarbons in Algeria. In
September 1966, SONATRACH's own power increased to include
the management of other sectors, from exploration to
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 1 7
production. On February 24, 1971, another decree nation
alizing all pipeline systems, natural gas reserves, and
foreign oil production, again enlarged SONATRACH's power.
Finally, two months later, all foreigners engaged in the
hydrocarbons business were required to function in associ
ation with SONATRACH, which was to own 51 percent of all
ventures. In addition to its domestic monopoly on the
import of all hydrocarbon by-products from fertilizers to
plastics. As a result, SONATRACH became the Societe
Nationale pour la Recherche, la Production, le Transport,
la Transformation et la Commercialisation des Hydrocar-
bures, the largest and most important company in the
country.
Despite the fact that SONATRACH exhibits some charac
teristics of private companies (a certain competitiveness,
varying salary scale, etc.) this company is, in the final
analysis, a direct extension of the government. For
example, the president (Directeur general) of SONATRACH is
nominated by the Ministry of Energy on the authority of
the President of Algeria, as was the case for the ex-
Minister of Energy, Said Ahmed Ghazali, who rose directly
to his position from the presidency of SONATRACH. All
department heads must be approved by the Ministry of
Energy.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 1 8
Ministry of Energy
President
Vice President/Head Organization & Planning Department
Executive Manager/Head Finance Department
Head of Personnel Department
Head of General Administrative Department
Head of Public Relations Department
Figure 4. Organizational Structure of SONATRACH
SONATRACH consists of four main divisions: (1) hydrocar
bons, (2) petrochemicals, liquefied natural gas, and
refining, (3) marketing, and (4) engineering and develop
ment .
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 1 9
Since the new regime of Chadli Bendjadid (1979),
there has been some change in the economic policy. This
change was reflected in a renewed emphasis by the govern
ment on the agricultural sector and a restructuring of the
abnormal development of the state companies. A typical
example of these companies is of course SONATRACH. This
oil company absorbed during the last 10 years 62 percent
of the industrial investments, consumed half of the
foreign country credit, and employed more than 100,000
employees. As a consequence, in April 1980, three presi
dential decrees were published in the Algerian official
journal announcing the restructuring of the national
company SONATRACH, out of which three new national enter
prises were created:
1. The GTP (1'Entreprise Nationale des Grand Travaux
Petroliers), responsible for the large industrial work
projects in the oil, gas, and petrochemical fields
2. The ERDP (1'Entreprise Nationale de Raffinage et
de Distribution des produits petroliers), responsible for
oil treatment and its derivatives, and distribution of gas
and refined products in the national market
3. The ENPC (1'Entreprise Nationale du Plastique et
Caoutchouc), responsible for the production and sale of
its products (plastic and rubber) in the national market
SONATRACH maintained control over research matters,
exploitation, transportation, and commercialization of
hydrocarbons in the international markets.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 120
This decision was the first of its kind in Algerian
economic history. According to the Ministry of Energy and
Petrochemical Industies, the decision to restructure
SONATRACH reflected the government's desire to split the
big company into various medium size enterprises, thus
making them more manageable. In addition, it was an
effective way to increase productivity because, in most
cases, the planned capacity of production was under
utilized.
Besides its technical aspects, this decision also had
economic and political implications. The abnormal devel
opment of some national enterprises, which in general
dominated the economy for almost two decades, is responsi
ble for multiplying the assets and wealth of a few people
in the upper-management levels (directors, managers).
Each company dominates the entire branch of economic
activity and operates under one centralized decision
making body, which has been leading to the emergence of
"Feudal Industries." Politically speaking, it is aimed at
abolishing the previous industrial policy established
during the years under the former Minister of Industry and
Energy, M. Belaid Abdelsslam. In addition, this decision
clearly indicates the willingness of President Bendjadid
to reduce the political power of this company. The
restructuring of the national companies can also be seen
as advantageous for the country in terms of creating a
decentralized decision-making body.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 121
In the same manner, the principle of restructuring
may be extended in the future to other state companies,
for example, the SNS (Societe Nationale de Siderurgie),
the DNC (Societe des Batiments) and the SONACOME (Societe
Nationale des Industries Mechaniques). In general, the
restructuring of the hydrocarbons sector has received
particular attention by the government. This is due to
the strategic importance which this sector holds in the
national economy.
The Strategic Importance of the Hydrocarbons Sector
To better understand the importance of the hydro
carbons sector, it is necessary to study the role of
hydrocarbons in the economic development of Algeria. To
do so, we should present the political and economic
significance of the sector.
From the political point of view, the utilization of
hydrocarbons as a source of energy and as a means of
economic growth has been given top priority by the govern
ment. President Boumediene had indicated on many occa
sions that the development of the hydrocarbons sector was
a necessary stage in preparing the conditions for estab
lishing an independent Algerian industrial sector. In
this sense, industrialization does not only mean the
utilization of energy sources and the treatment of raw
material, but it also means a policy free and independent
from foreign competition. Moreover, the hydrocarbons
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 122
sector is the government's source of political strength.
It is the state instrument for conducting foreign policy
and making its voice heard in international organizations.
From an economic point of view, the hydrocarbons
sector realizes 40 percent of Algeria's GNP (Gross
National Product), represents 96 percent of the country's
exports, contributes to state revenues by more than 50
percent, and employs more than 100,000 workers. More
specifically, energy exports jumped from 57.9 percent in
1963 to 97.4 percent in 1979 (see Table 29). The state
fiscal oil revenue increased from 7.5 percent in 1963 to
56 percent in 1978. The hydrocarbons sector also financed
47.4 percent of the total costs of imported industrial
equipment during the period 1962-1976. From 1976 and
beyond, the participation of the hydrocarbons sector in
financing economic projects has increased because of the
installation of the new liquefaction plant. Because of
the significant role played by the sector in the national
economy, the state assumed political and economic control
over the hydrocarbons sector.
The economic activities of the hydrocarbons sector
can be classified into different categories: crude oil,
natural gas, condensate and all liquefied gas (butane and
propane). This sector has recoverable reserves estimated
in 1978 at 10 thousand barrels per day of oil, or 1.24
million tons and 3,655 billion cubic meters of natural
gas.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 2 3
In 1978, SONATRACH estimated its proven crude oil
reserves at about 1.24 million tons. To confirm these
findings, SONATRACH commissioned the following foreign
consultants: the U.S. energy consultants of Degolyer
McNaughton and Bechtel Corporation. Degolyer McNaughton's
study cited only 1.023 million tons of proven reserves.
In 1978, the Algerian oil reserve was estimated at 1
percent of the world's reserve. According to other
estimates, the proven reserves of crude oil in January
1978 were about 900 million tons and in 1980 1151 million
tons (see Table 18) . To this we can add additional
possible reserves of 360 million tons of crude oil. The
accumulated production of the year 1978 and 1980 was 662
and 778 million tons, respectively. However, these
reserves cannot last more than twenty years at the 1979
rate of production (50 million tons). Table 18 shows the
proven reserves of Algerian crude oil.
TABLE 18
PROVEN RESERVES OF CRUDE OIL (Millions of Tons)
1960 1970 1973 1976 1978 1980
Reserves 714 1,091 1,528 1,006 900 1,151 Production accumulated in the beginning year 2 282 416 559 662 778 Total 716 1,373 1,944 1,565 1,562 1,929
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 51.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 2 4
The proven reserves of natural gas in January 1979
were estimated at 3,005 billion cubic meters, to which we
can add the possible reserves of 950 billion cubic meters.
The accumulated production for the same year was 77
billion cubic meters, excluding burned gas. Condensate
production in January 1979 was 20 million tons, while its
reserves were calculated at 525 million tons (see Table
19). Algeria could be seen as a modest of oil producer,
but it is certainly one of the largest producers of
natural gas in the world. In fact, the Algerian natural
gas reserve was estimated at 5 percent of the world's
reserve. Table 19 indicates proven reserves of natural
gas.
TABLE 19
PROVEN RESERVES OF NATURAL GAS
Natural Gas Condensate (billion (millions cubic meters) of tons)
Hassi-R'Mel 2,000 400 Rourde-Nouss 375 50 Alrar 160 25 Other regions 470 50 Total 3,005 525
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien, (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 51.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 2 5
It appears from these figures that the production of
natural gas is more developed, especially after putting
into operation the liquefaction units of methane in 1964,
1972 and 1978. By 1985, a total production of 115 billion
cubic meters is planned, of which 70 billion is set for
export. Hassi-Massaoud alone furnishes 94 billion cubic
meters, Rhourde-Nouss 15 billion cubic meters, and Alrar 5
billion cubic meters. To this we add 24 million tons of
condensate. Altogether, this represents two thirds of
world production. But it seems that this enormous and
ambitious program could not be achieved by 1985. Thus,
during the six years to come, Algeria anticipates produc
ing 100 billion cubic meters per year of natural gas and a
production of liquid hydrocarbons (crude oil, condensate,
liquid propane) of more than 75 million tons per year.
TABLE 20
OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION, 1970-1978
Products 1970 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978
Crude oil & condensate (millions of tons) 48.2 50.0 50.8 47.1 45.7 50.1 53.5 57.1 Natural gas (billions m3) 2.7 3.3 5.2 5.9 7.8 10.3 8.3 14.1
SOURCE: M.E. Benissad, Economie du de'veloppement de 1 1Alqerie (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 158.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 126
Today, three oil refineries exist in Algiers, Arzew,
and Hassi Massaoud, in addition to the liquefaction
complexes of natural gas at Arzew and Skikda. Determined
portions of oil derivatives production such as regular
gasoline, gas-oil, and kerosene, or derivates from natural
gas such as fertilizers and ammonia, are earmarked for
export. In addition to this, crude petroleum and lique
fied natural gas are the main hydrocarbons products used
for export.
In 1977, for example, petroleum revenues were esti
mated at 21 billion Algerian Dinars (DA), while total
fiscal revenues were 27.9 billion DA (75%). Since 1974,
the most significant and largest portion of revenues was
coming from the hydrocarbons sector. The rate of invest
ment in hydrocarbons was very high as it represented 39
percent of all industrial investments between 1973-1976.
These investments were used to cover the costs of imported
technology and its installation.
The evacuation of oil to the north toward the Medi
terranean Sea for easy transportation was assured by four
pipelines: the Arzew, Bejaia, Skikda, and Algiers pipe
lines. Natural gas was also assured by three gas pipe
lines: Arzew, Algiers, and Skikda. Table 21 shows the
national production, exports and consumption of oil and
natural gas.
According to Table 21, the completion of the first
three pipelines in 1959, 1960 and 1966, greatly improved
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. — — — — 1.6 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 National Consumption — — -- — 6.0 1.8 7.9 2.3 2.6 1.8 0.4 2.1 2.5 0.8 19.7 Exports (billions cubic meters) 2.3 1.9 1.5 0.3 0.3 17.825.2 11.0 10.3 Total Production — — ——— —————— 4.6 5.9 4.6 4.6 2.0 2.1 1.6 0.4 National T A B L E 2 1 Consumption Raw 49.2 49.0 40.9 5.2 7.8 42.1 48.0 5.5 14.0 6.8 5.2 34.9 2.2 3.4 2.4 36.3 41.142.0 2.0 2.1 2.8 31.9 1.5 20.3 0.1 15.5 0.1 0.2 Exported Oil (millions of tons) Natural gas 1.28.5 1.0 8.5 0.30.4 0.3 0.4 57.2 56.9 45.8 53.5 38.3 43.2 44.2 23.7 23.6 0.1 26.2 24.5 1.3 1.7 1.3 33.4 20.4 15.6 Total Production NATIONAL PRODUCTION EXPORTS, , AND CONSUMPTION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS, 1957-1979 SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement alqerien, (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 55. 1978 1979 1975 1976 50.1 45.1 1977 19731974 50.0 47.1 45.0 5.0 5.4 4.0 1.4 1971 37.2 1972 49.3 46.6 2.7 3.7 1967 1968 1969 1970 47.8 45.5 2.3 3.4 1963 1965 1966 1962 1960 1961 1964 26.3 24.9 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.4 1959 1958 1957 Date
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 2 8
the economic situation of the country the year immediately
following the completion of a pipeline, that is to say,
1960, 1961 and 1967. The decline of oil production in
1971 was due to the Algerian-French crisis of that same
year, while the decline of production in 1974 and 1975 was
due to the economic recession that struck the country and
the delay of new technological installations at Hassi-
Massaoud.
At the beginning of 1979, the maximum capacity that
these pipelines could transfer was 70 million tons of oil,
10 million tons of condensate, and 30 billion cubic meters
of gas. The evacuation of oil and gas by pipeline through
the Mediterranean Sea to other countries was made possible
by the recent completion of the Algeria-Italy pipeline via
Tunisia in 1981.
Some raw petroleum is being treated in Algeria at the
four refineries: Hassi-Massaoud (constructed in 1961,
with a capacity of 225,000 to 1 million tons); Algiers-El
Harrach (1964, with a capacity of 2.5 million tons per
year); Arzew (1972, with a capacity of 2.5 million tons);
and Skikda (with a capacity of 2.5 million tons per year).
All these refineries are under SONATRACH control (in terms
of commercialization and financing). Other refineries
are in the course of construction: An-Amenas (1 million
tons), Bejaia (5.5 million tons), and Skikda (15 million
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 2 9
tons) in order to assist the former ones. In 1979, these
refineries delivered 7 million tons of finished products.^-
In addition to this, several factories of gas lique
faction were implanted in the country, the first of which
was CAMEL (Compagnie Algerienne de Methane Liquide) in
Arzew. Most of its capital was from British sources, but
it was entirely purchased by SONATRACH by the end of 1977.
CAMEL began its production by 1964 with a capacity of 1.8
billion cubic meters per year.
The second factory, GNL-1 (Liquefied Natural Gas),
was constructed by Americans in Arzew. As it began opera
tion in early 1978, Arzew GNL-1 had a capacity of 10.5
billion cubic meters per year. Plans are to build two or
three more GNL factories with a capacity of 12.5 billion
cubic meters per year each. However, since many projects
are under construction, the Algerian government has
postponed the construction of the GNL3 factories for the
time being.
The third factory of gas liquefaction is that of
Skikda. This liquefied gas factory is supplied by the
Hassi-R'Mel-Skikda pipeline. It comprises three units of
liquefaction with the possibility of a fourth one at the
project's completion. Whereas the annual consumption
of natural gas is around 5 billion cubic meters, the
annual production of this factory will be as follows:
1 ' Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 59.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 0
1. 3.7 billion cubic meters in the form of GNL, and
up to 5 billion cubic meters at maximum capacity
2. 150,000 tons of methane, and up to 200,000 tons
per year at maximum capacity
3. 25,000 tons of butane propane, and up to 330,000
tons per year at maximum capacity
This factory uses the most sophisticated technology.
Although it is one of the most important liquefaction
factories in the world, it employs only 400 persons.
Oil Industry
The French first discovered oil in Algeria during the
revolutionary war year of 1956. Production marketing
began in 1958. Before independence, Algeria's oil and
natural gas had been exploited by foreign companies, and
particularly French companies who controlled the explora
tion, capital, techniques, sales, and production managers.
After independence, French control was established by the
Evian Decree of 1962, thereby creating difficulties in the
beginning for the newly independent Algeria to manage its
oil and natural gas.
In December 1963, the government created the national
company SONATRACH in order to build the third pipeline
(from Haoud-el Hamra to Arzew) which the foreign oil
companies refused to construct. As we have already seen,
cooperation between Algeria and France continued after
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 1 2 independence due to the 1965 accord. In 1969, Algeria
decided to revise this accord to increase the price of
oil, but France refused to accept the price hike. Mean
while, Algeria was in need of capital in order to imple
ment its first four-year plan (1970-1973). The Ministry
of Energy and Industry increased the reference price of
oil from 2.08 to 2.65 dollars, and later raised it to 3.60
dollars (see Table 24). As a result, Algerian-French oil
price negotiations began in November 1969. These negotia
tions led to the nationalization of all foreign firms,
including French oil companies, in 1971. Algeria could
not have nationalized its oil industry prior to 1971
because SONATRACH did not have the required expertise to
operate it on its own. In February 1971, Algeria gained
control over more than half of its oil production (51%),
and almost all of its exploration, transportation and
distribution rights. In addition, it gained full control
over its natural gas (100%) . As a consequence, SONA-
TRACH's share of oil production has increased since 1971,
while fundamentally decreasing the foreign companies'
share. Oil production also dropped significantly in 1971.
This decline of oil production, of course, had a negative
effect on the first four-year plan, as we will see in
2 A. Decoufle, "Aspects socio-politique de 1 'Accord Franco-Algerien du 29 Juillet 1965 sur, les hydrocarbures et le developpement de l'Algerie" in Economie Appliquee XIX (1966): 82-90.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Chapter VIII. Table 22 shows in general the increase of
oil production by SONATRACH and the decline of oil produc
tion by foreign companies.
TABLE 22
PRODUCTION OF OIL BY SONATRACH AND FOREIGN COMPANIES (Millions of Tons)
Foreign Year SONATRACH Companies
1966 3.9 29.5 1967 4.6 33.7 1968 5.9 37.3 1969 7.3 37.5 1970 10.2 38.0 1971 23.3 13.8 1972 38.5 11.6 1973 38.8 12.0 1974 35.8 11.4 1975 33.8 11.9 1976 40.4 9.7 1977 42.9 10.6 1978 45.1 12.1 1979 45.5 11.4 1980 — 10.1
SOURCE: Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 61.
As regards oil pricing, Algeria has adopted the
Geneva reference price $3.83 per barrel since 1972. In
1973, SONATRACH again adopted a new policy to deal with
its clients who do not participate in hydrocarbons re
search in Algeria and raised the oil price to $9.30. The
reference price for each barrel of oil became $16.2 in
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 3
January 1976. The OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Export
ing Countries) increased its oil price by 15 percent
effective January 1979. Table 23 shows the evolution of
Algerian crude petroleum prices.
TABLE 23
EVOLUTION OF ALGERIAN CRUDE OIL PRICES (Dollars)
Jan. Apr. Feb. Nov. Jan. Jan. 1965 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1976
2.08a 2.65 3.60 3.83 9.30 16.21 16.2
SOURCE: Andre Gauthier, L'Alqerie: decolonialisation, socialisme, industrialisation (Canada: Breal Editeur, 1976), p. 107.
,a. This figure taken from Benissad, Economie du developpement de l'Alqerie, p.157.
Between 1967 and 1970, the Western oil companies of
Esso, Shell, Sinclair, Sofrapel, Amif, Phillips Petroleum,
and Mobil were nationalized. Control and distribution of
oil products and other hydrocarbon derivatives was en
trusted to SONATRACH. However, part of the oil production
continued to be exploited by foreigners. For example,
France's company Total was one of the major foreign
producers that had remained by 1978. Since 1975, the CFP
(Compagnie Francaise des Petroles) was another foreign
company that associated with SONATRACH for oil production
until 1980. Getty Oil also maintained a joint-production
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 4
venture with SONATRACH until 1978, but it was much smaller
in scale. Table 24 shows crude and refined oil production
for 1973-1977.
TABLE 24
CRUDE AND REFINED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, 1973-1977 (THOUSANDS OF METRIC TONS)
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
Oil (crude & condensate) 50,822 47,192 45,788 50,183 53,838 Refined oil 245 328 545 653 1,048 Products 4,696 4,405 5,036 4,450 4,172 Regular gasoline 546 427 557 512 439 Super gasoline 314 306 254 298 410 Kerosene 338 363 450 405 360 Diesel oil 1,610 1,513 1,627 1,464 1,421 Fuel oil 1,404 1,290 1,508 1,333 1,133 Naphtha 432 466 576 454 284 Bitumen 52 39 62 56 81 Lubricants -- 1 2 18 44
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World In formation Corp., 1978) p. 59.
The 1977 planned crude production was 55 million
tons, or 10 percent more than in 1976. How much oil could
be produced annually? Some overly optimistic estimates
were conducted at the beginning of the last decade.
SONATRACH assumed that oil production would soon reach 65
million tons, but this figure is considered high today.
At a rate of 60 million tons per year, Algeria will
probably deplete its reserves in 20 years.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 5
During 1976, crude oil revenues were about 4 billion
dollars, a figure which was increased somewhat in 197 7.
Using 1976 prices, SONATRACH estimated that its revenues
from crude sales approached 4.5 billion dollars in 1980.
However, another factor which must be taken into account
is that the rate of domestic consumption is increasing at
an annual rate of 15 percent. Therefore, in order for
SONATRACH to maintain this level of revenues it has to
keep the domestic consumption of oil at the same rate
(15%) , which is impossible to accomplish.
Algeria's crude product is of exceptional quality.
It has a low sulphur content and it is light with a high
yield of paraffin naphtha. In addition to this, the
product is conveniently transported through pipelines to
the Mediterranean Sea for export to Europe and North
America. For these reasons, Algeria's crude product is
among the world's most expensive.
Algeria's main oil customer between 1972 and 1975 was
West Germany which bought about 37 billion tons. From
1976 to 1979, America was Algeria's main oil customer
through Exxon and Gulf Oil which bought 21 billion tons.
In 1977, the United States took 55 percent of Algerian
crude production and remains Algeria's prime customer.
Other main customers include several European countries:
West Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom.
West Germany was the second oil importer after the United
States in 1980, importing 9.5 million tons of Algerian oil
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 6
in 1979. Table 25 shows the oil exports for the years
1972-1975 on a country-by-country basis. Table 26 shows
the exports and domestic consumption by type of product.
TABLE 25
ALGERIAN OIL EXPORTS (CRUDE AND CONDENSATE), BY DESTINATION, 1972-1975
Destination 1972 1973 1974 1975
West Germany 9,326.8 10,711.4 8,423.7 8,490.2 U.S.A. 3,682.7 5,357.7 8,173.6 7,033.9 Italy 3,562.5 4,382.9 2,761.1 2,170.9 Spain 4,124.2 3,983.7 2,216.6 1,635.8 France 2,401.6 2,693.6 1,740.6 1,532.7 Brazil 1,745.4 ---- 1,576.7 760.2 U.K. 992.5 1,803.0 930.9 564.5 Morocco 793.4 964.5 628.6 --- Netherlands 1,555.4 828.6 579.4 904.2 Sweden 798.9 724.7 560.2 56.6 Switzerland 792.1 591.0 466.8 67.8 Norway --- 327.3 412.8 --- Egypt 123.6 269.1 302.0 — Denmark --- 260.6 290.4 --- Bulgaria 611.9 244.8 226.9 108.6 Canada --- 149.6 220.3 70.5 Romania 290.2 147.2 211.9 280.0 Belgium 2,493.0 75.4 206.3 837.3 East Germany 207.3 --- 162.0 --- Austria 105.9 --- 153.7 --- Poland ------368.0 Finland ------356.8 Yugoslavia ------329.1 Japan ------288.8 Zaire ------268.4 China ------289.7 Other 289.1 259.3 481.8 984.2
Total 33,896.8 33,799.4 30,726.3 27,398.2
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Alqeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp ., 1978)p . 62.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 7
TABLE 26
EXPORTS AND DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION OF CRUDE AND REFINED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, 1973-1977 (Thousands of Metric Tons)
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977a
Exports Petroleum 45,002 42,110 40,637 45,083 48,919 of which SONATRACH (33,779) (30,726) (28,704) (35,390) (38,220) Liquefied gas frcm petroleum 8 59 252 264 534 Refined petroleum products 2,389 2,161 2,468 1,964 938 Ordinary gasoline 197 113 178 118 8 Super gasoline 106 64 49 19 34 Kerosene 96 127 165 139 69 Diesel oil 501 434 414 188 8 Fuel oil 1,089 932 1,082 1,032 544 Naphtha 400 491 580 468 275
Domestic consumption Petroleum slod to domestic refineries 5,012 4,623 5,214 4,675 4,558 Liquefied gas from petroleum 260 296 360 443 569 Refined petroleum products 2,586 2,700 2,983 3,156 3,862 Motor and fuel oils 2,132 2,407 2,685 2,948 3,631 Bitumen 115 137 128 125 140 Lubricants 51 59 70 83 91 Soot 288 97 100 ——
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 63
a. Estimates.
b. Including changes in stocks.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 8
Oil exploration has continued, but there is no
evidence that a major discovery will be made. Petrobas,
Total, Sun Oil, Hispan Oil, Deminex, the French producer
ERAP, and Amoco have agreements with SONATRACH. If any of
these companies discovers oil, 51 percent of its explora
tion costs will be reimbursed in form of crude oil, and
production is to be apportioned between SONATRACH and the
foreign company on a 51-49 percent basis over a specified
period of time. In July 1980, the French oil company CFP
and the American company Amoco signed an associate con
tract with SONATRACH for research and oil exploitation in
Algeria. In case of discovery, SONATRACH will take 65
percent and CFP 35 percent of production, whereas in the
case of Amoco, SONATRACH agreed to take 58 percent and
Amoco 42 percent. SONATRACH has another contract with Sun
Oil company. In case of discovery, SONATRACH will take 65
percent and the American company Sun Oil will take 35
percent of the production.
SONATRACH's policy is aimed at defining known fields.
From 1966 to 1972, roughly $425 million was invested in
exploration of Algerian oil fields. Almost $319 million
was provided by SONATRACH. As a result, 20 new fields
with recoverable reserves estimated at 100 million tons,
were discovered. In 1976, SONATRACH spent some $250
million on exploration and it is believed to have in
creased that figure in 1977.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 3 9
Over the past few years most findings have been
minor. The foreign companies that participate in oil
exploration are especially disappointed. Getty has put
more than $100 million into the Sahara over five years,
and has come-up with nothing. Such was the case for Sun
Oil, Amoco, and Deminex. Petrobas and Hispan Oil have
made modest findings. Near In-Amenas, the Total company
has discovered a field that could yield 2 million tons a
year.
Because oil exploration does not seem encouraging, it
is obvious that more resources will be shifted from
exploration and production to refining. Besides the
existing refineries (at Algiers, Arzew, and Hassi-
Massaoud), four new refineries (at In-Amenas, Bejaia,
Hassi-Massaoud, and Skikda) were constructed and others
are still under construction (see Table 27).
Between 1974 and 1976, the percentage of exports
reached 90 percent, and by 1976 jumped to 97 percent (see
Table 28). Meanwhile, the percentage of other exports
such as agricultural products (wine, dates, etc.) has
declined.
Under present conditions, Algeria cannot produce more
than 50 million tons of oil per year; otherwise it would
consume half of its known reserves by the end of 1984. Of
this production, Algeria retains a sufficient quantity for
its own needs each year. It could consume 10 million tons
per year if the existing plants were operating at full
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4 0
TABLE 27
PRESENT REFINING CAPACITY (Tons)
Existing Refineries Annual Capacity
Algiers 2,700,000 Arzew 2,500,000 Hassi-Massaoud 200,000 Total 5,400,000
In Amenas 300,000 Bejaia 7,500,000 Hassi-Massaoud II 1,100,000 Skikda 15,000,000 Total 23,900,000
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 66.
NOTE: This table is constructed from two earlier tables and updated.
capacity. But Algeria, at the present time, does not
consume more than 5 to 6 million tons per year (see Table
21) . It is anticipated that the coming years will see
more reduction in oil exports in order to save limited
reserves. Algerian authorities are aware of the limita
tions placed on oil reserves. The oil reserve of Algeria
was estimated at 1.1 billion tons. With the rate of
export between 50 and 55 million tons (52 million tons in
1979), the oil will be exhausted within 20 years.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 141
TABLE 28
ALGERIAN EXPORTS OF VARIOUS OIL PRODUCTS
Percent Year Millions DA of Exports
1963 2168 57.9 1964 1933 53.9 1965 1690 53.7 1966 1819 59.3 1967 2605 72.9 1968 2909 71.0 1969 2979 70.0 1970 3505 70.4 1971 3149 74.8 1972 4816 82.3 1973 6206 83.0 1974 18261 93.2 1975 17,273 93.1 1976 21,097 95.0 1977 24,397 96.2 1978 24,082 96.2 1979 35,578 97.4
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement alqerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 62.
However, this analysis does not take into considera
tion the increase of the national consumption during these
coming 20 years. National consumption was estimated at 5
million tons in 1980. This makes us believe that the oil
reserves of the country will last less than 20 years. If
national consumption and oil exports remained at an annual
rate of 50 million tons per year, the country's reserves
would not extend beyond the year 2000, but only to 15
years from now, at which time Algeria would join the other
crude oil importer countries. This view of the future is
not a promising one. This also explains the new Algerian
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4 2
oil policy which has been undertaken by the FLN central
committee since 1980. This policy was manifested in the
government's decision to protect the strategic reserves of
hydrocarbons (oil and gas) , and the reduction of oil
exports. President Chadli Bendjadid has stressed on many
occasions the importance of safeguarding Algerian oil
reserves rather than converting them into currency. As a
result, since 1980, the Algerian oil policy has been
marked by a voluntary reduction in oil exports. More
efforts were directed toward improving the country's
refining capacity. However, the decline in crude oil
sales has been balanced by the increase of natural gas
exports, and the augmentation of the LNG price. This
explains why Algerian became more sensitive about oil
prices than the volume of exports.
Some high-level political authorities still believe
that the exclusive utilization of hydrocarbons is a
necessity in order to generate hard currency. For exam
ple, the returns from oil exports was estimated at 10
billion dollars in 1979, compared to 6 billion dollars in
1978. The hard currency revenue from oil increased from
50 percent in 1979 to 89 percent in 1981. Also, reducing
oil exports will definitely slow down economic development
and reduce the chances for the country to reimburse the
money borrowed from foreign banks during the previous
decade.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4 3
Despite this, Algerian policy-makers have already
started to reduce oil exports and tried to improve, at the
same time, the refining capacity of the country. Oil
exports have declined from 51 million tons in 1980 to only
30 million tons in 1982. President Bendjadid has noted
that it is time for Algeria to think seriously about its
huge investments and the amounts of foreign currency that
are being absorbed by hydrocarbons. According to Belkacem
Nabi, Minister of Energy and petrochemical industries:
"Oil is being used in exchange for wheat, medication, and
imported products, instead of contributing to the effort 3 of economic development."
Gas Industry
In the Algerian Sahara lie about 12 percent of the
world's known gas reserves. Only the Soviet Union and the
United States have larger reserves. Gas is thus the
nation's number one resource for export. In the coming
decades, during which natural gas will play an increasing
ly important role, Algeria will be the world's top export
er of the product. Table 29 indicates the steady increase
in the production, export and domestic consumption of
natural gas.
Marches Tropicaux et Mediterraneans 1809 (Juillet 1980): 3395.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4 4
TABLE 29
PRODUCTION, EXPORT, AND DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION OF NATURAL GAS, 1973-1977 (Millions of Cubic Meters)
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977a
Production 5,621 5,978 7,817 10,300 10,047 Transportation 4,783 5,497 6,684 8,514 10,043 Domestic consumption 1,399 1,561 1,847 2,317 2,664 Sales of liquefaction plans 3,384 3,936 4,837 6,197 7,379 Production of . liquefied gas 2,577 3,014 3,816 4,946 5,332 Exports of liquefied gas 2,521 2,921 3,758 4,952 5,294
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 67.
a. Estimates.
b. One cubic meter of liquefied natural gas = 625 cubic meters of natural gas.
Algeria's natural gas includes substantial quantities
of light oils commonly called condensate. Condensate is a
prime liquid feed-stock for petrochemical and petroleum
refining operations, and it usually commands a premium
price over heavy crude. Estimated Algerian condensate
reserves are about 525 million tons. The country can
produce more than 15 million tons a year.
The future of natural gas, with reserves of more than
3655 billion cubic meters, seems to be very promising.
Unlike oil, where even the domestic consumption is subject
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. to restrictions, domestic consumption of natural gas is
estimated at 3 billion cubic meters with a growth rate of
16 percent. In fact, natural gas has helped and will
continue to encourage the government to pursue the policy
of saving oil reserves. Exporting liquefied natural gas
(LNG) is the sole objective outlined in industrial gas
plans. LNG exports were raised to 14 billion cubic meters
in 1979, representing 10 percent of hydrocarbons revenues,
compared to 5 percent of crude and 15 percent of conden
sate. Table 30 shows the growth of Algeria's LNG exports.
TABLE 30
ALGERIAN EXPORTS OF NATURAL GAS, 1973-1976 (Millions of Cubic Meters)
1973 1974 1975 1976
France 1,335 1,830 2,574 3,141 United Kingdom 1,087 918 919 1,006 Spain 92.5 172 121 398 United States 7.5 148 334
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 73.
Unlike the oil sector, there are many problems with
the gas industry: (1) technical problems in building the
liquefaction plants, (2) contractual problems in dealing
with the companies that are designing and engineering the
plants, and (3) political problems in getting U.S. and
other governments approval of sales contracts. In the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 146
face of these obstacles, Algeria must develop its own
industrial expertise in order to contract and operate the
liquefaction plants independently. The construction of
gas pipelines and modern liquefaction plants are necessary
if Algeria is to continue selling to North America the
huge quantities of liquefied natural gas which Europe
could never consume.
Since independence, two pipelines were constructed by
SONATRACH, linking Haoud El-Hamra with Arzew (achieved in
1966) and Haoud El-Hamra with Skikda (achieved in 1972) .
The most important pipeline was the one constructed by
Great Britain linking Hassi R'Mel with Arzew, which cost
600 million DA with an annual transportation capacity of
22 million tons of oil (which is more than 45 percent of
the annual crude production). The fundamental gas pipe
line network of Algeria is composed of three main gas
pipelines that link Hassi R'Mel, Arzew and Skikda together
with a capacity to transport 15 billion cubic meters per
year. Table 31 shows the major Algerian gas pipelines.
Although capacity may appear superior compared to the
actual production in 1974, the difference is minimal if we
include the number of contracts with foreign countries
which have been increasing rapidly. The total capacity of
Algerian gas pipelines reached 60 billion meters per year
at the end of the second four-year plan (1974-1977). Two
new gas pipeline projects were recently completed in 1983
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4 7
TABLE 31
MAJOR ALGERIAN GAS PIPELINES
Distance Dates of Annual ^ Pipelines (in km) Operation Costs Capacity
Hassi R'Mel Arzew 509 1961 200 3.0 Hassi R'Mel-Skikda 575 1972 417 6.0 Hassi R'Mel-Arzew II 506 1974 600 6.0
SOURCE: Andre Gauthier, L'Alqerie (Montreal: Breal Edi- teur, 1976), p. 106.
a. In million DA.
b. In billion cubic meters.
by a consortium of companies: SONEMS (Societe Algero-
Italienne) constructed the gas pipeline that links Algeria
with Italy via Tunisia, which will have a capacity of 18
billion cubic meters per year. This pipeline is planned
to deliver 12 billion cubic meters of natural gas to
Italy. SEGAMO (Societe Alger-Franco-Espagnole) construct
ed the gas pipeline that connects Algeria (Oued-Mellah)
with Spain (Almeria) with an estimated capacity of 10 to
15 billion cubic meters per year.
Moreover, the construction of liquefaction plants
along the mediterranean coast (Arzew, Bijaia, Skikda) will
also contribute to the country's rapid development. After
the 1970's the liquefaction plants network was greatly
expanded. In addition to the main liquefaction factories
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4 8
in Arzew and Skikda, other installations have been com
pleted and some are still under construction, such as the
LNG centers of Issers, Arzew LNG 2, LNG 3, LNG 4, and
Skikda extension, LNG 2, LNG 3, LNG 4, LNG 5, and LNG 6.
The liquefaction factories which are presently totally
operational are the LNG centers of Issen (near Algiers),
Camel, LNG1, LNG2, (in Arzew), and the Skikda complex.
Table 32 shows the existing Algerian liquefaction plants.
TABLE 32
ALGERIA'S LNG PLANTS
Liquefaction Annual Capacity Plants (billion m3)
Arzew plants CAMEL 1.6 LNG 1 10.5 LNG 2 10.5 LNG 3 15.5 LNG 4 5.5
Skikda plants LNG 1 4.5 Extension 4.5 LNG 2 10.0 LNG 3 15.5 LNG 4 1.4 LNG 5 10.5 LNG 6 10.5
Issers LNG Center 10.5
SOURCE: The figures above adapted from Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 69, and updated.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 4 9
The LNG factory in Arzew, at a capacity of 10.5
billion cubic meters, is alone capable of supplying
annually 2 percent of U.S. needs. The three Arzew Plants
(LNG1, LNG2, LNG3) alone could produce annually twice as
much gas as Italy can consume. The plant at Camel is
currently producing above its 1.6 billion cubic meters
technical capacity. With the realization of LNG1 and LNG2
in Arzew, with a capacity of 10.5 billion cubic meters
each, Algeria was able to produce between 16 to 30 billion
cubic meters of liquefied natural gas in 1981. The future
of LNG3, which is supposed to deliver liquefied natural
gas to France (5 billion cubic meters per year), Germany
(18 billion cubic meters per year), and Holland (4 billion
cubic meters per year), is still uncertain. The LNG3 unit
is supposed to be constructed by the Foster Wheeler
Company and be equipped by the French company Technip.
The contract with these two foreign firms was signed in
1979.
By the year 2005, Algerian policy-makers are planning
to have completed construction on 7 new factories for
liquefied natural gas and 7 refineries, at a cost of $36
billion. Part of this ambitious program has already been
accomplished in Skikda and Arzew. For example, the Skikda
complex of liquefaction and LNG1, as well as LNG2 in Arzew
alone cost $17.5 billion . Besides the Arzew and Skikda
plants, additional plants of similar magnitude at Issers
and Hassi R'Mel are being considered for the future.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 0
All these plants have been constructed by European
and American firms (e.g., Pullman International, the San
Francisco-based Bechtel corporation, Technip, and others) .
Table 33 shows the LNG plant contractors.
TABLE 33
LNG PLANT CONTRACTORS
Plants Contractors
Arzew LNG 1 Chemico - Bechtel LNG 2 Pullman Kellogg LNG 3 Foster Wheeler
Skikda LNG 1 Technip LNG 2 Technip LNG 3 Technip LNG 4 Pritchard Rhodes LNG 5 Pritchard - Pullman International LNG 6 Pritchard - Pullman International
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 75.
In Arzew, when Chemico ran into problems in completing the
LNG1 plant, the Bechtel corporation took over. Likewise
in Skikda, when Technip, which was supposed to handle the
entire project, ran into problems, SONATRACH gave the
construction of LNG4, 5, and 6 to the British firm of
Pritchard Rhodes. But after Pritchard struck-out and
could not finish LNG 5 and 6, Pullman International took
over. In addition to these firms, a number of other
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 1
foreign firms have received lesser contracts connected
with the natural gas plants. For example, Raymond Inter
national of Texas was awarded a $10 million contract in
1977 for the installation of water-cooling ducts, and
since early 1977, WESCON International of the Netherlands
has been at work on two gas treatment plants worth $41
million. Japan Gasoline Company and C. Itoh of Japan
conducted negotiations with the Algerian authorities in
mid-1977 on an approximate half-billion dollar deal to
build a turnkey plant at Hassi R'Mel, to process natural
gas into liquid oil gas and condensate. For 237.5 million
dollars, Italy's ENI Company is building two gas "reinjec
tion" stations at Hassi R'Mel. These two stations are
designed to increase production of condensate, methane and
propane. The development of the Alrar field in the
In-Amenas region will be undertaken by SONATRACH and the
American company FLOUR Inc. Alrar, a natural gas field
with reserves estimated at 100 billion cubic meters, is
expected to produce 1.5 million tons of condensate and
700,000 tons of liquid oil gas annually. The cost of this
project is estimated at $336 million, with Algerian
materials and services accounting for $62 million of the
total cost. Financing all foreign services and equipment
is guaranteed by the U.S. Export-Import Bank and a group
of banks led by the European Banking Company.
The development of Algeria's most important natural
gas fields will certainly contribute to the economic
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 2
development of the country, but at the same time, the
establishment of these gas pipelines under the Mediterran
ean Sea will have a direct effect on the naval transporta
tion network of the liquefied gas (LNG)* "by both Algeria
(CNAN) and the European countries, especially France
(Societe Francaise Gasocean). By the end of 1990, Algeria
could become the first exporter country of LNG in the
world because of its numerous contracts signed with
European countries and with the United States.
The main European customers of Algerian gas are the
United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, West Germany, and especially
France. The first contract for delivery of gas from
Hassi-R'Mel to Europe was concluded in 1964 between the
Council Gas Company and Camel of Arzew, for furnishing
Great Britain with 1 billion cubic meters of gas per year
for 15 years. Spain began receiving Algerian natural gas
only after signing a contract with SONATRACH in 1972 for a
period of 20 years. In 1978, France imported from Algeria
around 4 billion cubic meters annually, a figure which
later rose to 7.5 billion cubic meters. Belgium's Distri-
gaz recently contracted with SONATRACH for receiving 5
billion cubic meters will allow her to pipe its natural
gas to Europe directly through two gas pipelines:
Algeria-Italy, and Algeria-Spain, pipelines via Tunisia.
As a result, Spain has agreed to begin importing 4.5
billion cubic meters annually. In July 1978, SONATRACH
gave final approval to deliver 4 billion cubic meters of
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 3
natural gas per year to West Germany for 20 years begin
ning in 1984. It was announced by SONATRACH that 20 year
contracts with France, Sweden, Austria, Yugoslavia and
Tunisia will also begin in 1984.
TABLE 34
CONTRACTS OF GAS DELIVERY TO FRANCE
Shipment Period Date of Annual3 ports Contracts (years) Delivery Delivery Terminals
Arzew Camel-Gas de 15 1965b 0.5 Le Havre France, 1968
Skikda SONATRACH-Gas 15 1973b 3.5 Fos de France, 1971
Arzew II SONATRACH-Gas de France 20 1980 3.5°
SOURCE: Andre Gauthier, L'Algerie (Montreal : Breal Editeur, 1976), p. 109.
a. In billion cubic meters.
b. Extended 10 years by the June 1976 accord.
c. 3.65 since June 1976.
The most important contracts were signed with France.
Table 34 shows Algerian-French contracts and the annual
gas delivery to France. France did not receive the
quantity of gas that was agreed to in the February 1971
accord because of the Algerian-French oil crisis. In
1974, total imports of Algerian LNG did not exceed 1.8
billion cubic meters because of the technical failure in
the liquefaction plant at Skikda. In 1975, Algeria began
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 4
to apply a new fixed price for its gas. Since the
beginning of the first two contracts in 1968 and 1971,
prices were much lower than the price level applicable in
the international market since 1971, for example, 40 cents
vs. 1.30 to 1.40 dollars for each million BTU (1 British
Thermal Unit = 252 calories). This Algerian-French crisis
was overcome in 1976 after two successful contracts which
allowed the French to import annually 3.5 billion cubic
meters of LNG at the new Algerian price. In June 1976, a
second contract was signed allowing France to prolong its
first two contracts (1968, 1971) by 10 years each. These
contracts were a result of the negotiations between
SONATRACH and the European consortium of companies,
Eurogaz. Delivery of gas to France resumed again in
Summer 1980 at the conclusion of the protected negotia
tions between SONATRACH and Gaz de France. According to
the new contract signed by Algeria and France in February
1982, Algeria is supposed to deliver 5.15 billion cubic
meters of LNG annually to Gaz de France for 20 years. The
French terminal, Montoir, received, in 1982, 2 million
tons of LNG, of which 400,000 tons were directed to
Belgium. In 1983, 6 million tons of LNG arrived at
Montoir, and by 1984-1985, the volume of LNG is to be
increased to 8 million tons. The Algerian-French contract
of February 1982 has increased Algeria's revenues from
natural gas, as well as helped Algeria to negotiate with
other customers, especially Italy. Italy, by the way, has
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 5
finally agreed to receive 13 billion cubic meters of
natural gas through the new Algeria-Italy gas pipeline.
In the final analysis, since 1980, France has been the
second importer of Algerian gas after the United States.
The United States has become Algeria's major market
for natural gas. At the beginning, Europe was the market
ing target, but after gas was discovered in the Nether
lands and in the North Sea, the European market was
reduced. The European market was also courted by the
Soviet Union because the Soviet product was cheaper than
Algeria's in both Eastern and Western Europe. It was at
this point that Algeria began looking to the U.S. as a
possible market. The questions we may ask at this level
of the analysis are: could Algeria deliver LNG to the east
coast of the U.S at the right price? Could Algeria's
potential U.S clients cope with the U.S. (political)
lobbies opposed to Algerian imports? Could the Federal
Energy Commission be persuaded to approve gas imports?
Nevertheless, Algeria made every effort to overcome these
difficulties. In 1969, El Paso Natural Gas signed the
first American purchasing contract and agreed to import
annually 10 billion cubic meters of LNG for 25 years.
Subsequently, five more contracts were signed, adding up
to a potential North American purchase of some 41.2
billion cubic meters of LNG per year, or about 5 percent
of total U.S. demand. Table 35 shows these six con
tracts .
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 156
TABLE 35
AMERICAN LNG CONTRACTS
Annually Company (billion m3)
El Paso I 10.0 El Paso II 10.0 Tenneco 10.0 Eascogas 6.0 Trunkline Gas 4.0 Distrigas of Boston 1.2 Total 41.2
SOURCE: This table is constructed from data provided in Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 70.
All contracts were to be subject to the Federal
Energy Commission's approval. By 1978, only three of the
original six contracts had been approved: El Paso Natural
Gas, Trunkline Gas, and Distrigas of Boston. The Algerian
natural gas was to be delivered daily to the terminals at
Cove Point (Maryland) and Savannah (Georgia). Later, the
Algerian government decided to revise the SONATRACH-E1
Paso contract in order to be able to increase its gas
price. However, El Paso, which had previously agreed to
import 10 billion cubic meters per year for a period of 25
years, could not obtain approvel from the federal govern
ment for the increase caused by the Algerian gas price
hike. This contract was suspended in 1980. The United
States continued to receive Algerian liquefied gas through
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 7
Distrigas of Boston (1.2 billion cubic meters per year)
and Trunkline Gas (4.0 billion cubic meters per year) for
20 years at $3.25 for each million BTU. A new agreement
was reached in 1981 with El Paso to receive 10.5 billion
cubic meters per year.
According to SONATRACH, in 1982 the United States
planned to import a total of 26.6 billion cubic meters
annually. Algeria's exports of liquefied natural gas to
the United States have increased much more than exports to
Europe, and in 1984 the export level was raised to 44
billion cubic meters per year. This volume was agreed
upon and confirmed by both Algeria and the United States.
Natural gas exports to North America may reach 60 billion
cubic meters by the end of the present decade. From these
figures, we can conclude that the increase in natural gas
exports will continue as a justification for the high cost
of liquefaction plants, as well as prompt rapid economic
development.
Development of the gas industry is very expensive.
It is estimated that 2.5 billion dollars is required to
develop 10 billion cubic meters of gas for delivery. At
the same time, huge amounts of capital are needed in three
crucial development areas:
1. Liquefaction plants
2. Facilities to "gather in" gas and pipe it to
liquefaction plants
3. Terminals for liquefied natural gas
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 8
As we have already seen, most Algerian gas comes from the
nation's largest field, Hassi R'Mel, far south in the
Sahara (see Appendix A) . To pipe the gas from there to
Arzew requires 509 km of line, while to Skikda 575 km of
line is needed. This costs 1 billion dollars annually for
the pipe alone.
In 1982, the World Bank estimated that Algeria must
borrow an average of $3 billion annually. Most of this
money is needed to finance the liquefaction plants, the
development of gas fields, and the construction of pipe
lines from the fields to the liquefaction plants and LNG
terminals. Despite the size of the financial burden,
Algeria policy-makers are proceeding with their plans of
natural gas and LNG sales. They see natural gas as the
only way through which the country can generate foreign
exchange by the year 2000, when oil supplies will quickly
dwindle. If Algerian resources of natural gas are among
the largest in the world, the development and export of
natural gas also requires a huge capital investment, as
well as expensive technology and installations. In the
end, the success or failure of this policy will largely
depend upon what happens to world LNG prices.
Concerning the price of gas, SONATRACH has conducted
several negotiation with its main consumers: the United
States, France, West Germany, Italy, Spain, Belgium, etc.
Negotiations between Algeria and the United States led to
the conciliation of the SONATRACH and El Paso Natural Gas
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 5 9
contract in 1980. Contract negotiations between SONATRACH
and Gaz de France on gas pricing were disrupted many
times, however, both countries finally resumed negotia
tions in March 1980. In 1979, Algeria provided France
with more than 13 percent of its gas consumption. Negoti
ations between SONATRACH and Distrigaz of Belgium were
successfully concluded in 1972 by the signing of a 20-year
contract for importing from Algeria 5 million cubic meters
of LNG starting in 1982.
The price of natural gas for export will determine
whether Algeria will continue to export its natural gas in
the form of liquefied gas or not. The prices of gas in
North America and Europe (especially France, Germany and
the Netherlands who import from Algeria about 15 billion
cubic meters for 20 years beginning in 1983) are, accord
ing to SONATRACH, lower compared to its equivalent in oil
(in terms of thermal unit). For example, France imports 4
billion cubic meters of gas per year at a price of $3 for
each million BTU, while Canada sells its gas for $4.50 for
each million BTU to the United States. At this low price,
natural gas does not generate enough revenue that will
permit the country to construct its liquefaction plants
with advanced technology. As a result, the Algerian
policy-makers established a basic price (prix de base) of
$5 for each million BTU. By so doing, Algeria established
a basic price for its natural gas comparable to the
thermic equivalent of its crude oil price. In 1980, the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 160
rate between the two prices was double ($3 for each
million BTU gas, compared to $7 for its equivalent in
oil) . However, harmonizing the basic selling price of
natural gas was characterized by dissimilarity among the
different customers. For example, Spain paid 60 percent
more for Algerian gas than did France, while in turn,
France paid more than the United States ($1.80 vs. $1.75).
Therefore, it was necessary for Algeria to call for
gas price negotiations, even with its main customers:
America (El Paso), France (Gaz de France) , Germany
(Ruhrgas Salzgitter and Brigitta/Thyssengas), and Holland
(Gasunie) . The result of these negotiations permitted
Algeria to increase its gas price from $1.95 to $6.11 for
each million BTU beginning in 1980. In this respect, Mr.
Belkacem Nabi, Minister of Energy and Petrochemical
Industries, noted that "[tjhere is no reason for the price
of Algerian gas to remain marginal compared to the inter- 4 national market price."
Using 1976 price, SONATRACH estimated that LNG sales
in 1981 approached $5.3 billion dollars. Crude sales
during the same year were $4.45 billion. By 1985, accord
ing to SONATRACH, LNG income will be $7.5 billion.
Finally, the outlook for the future is that Algeria is
planning to export 70 billion cubic meters of natural gas
^ , / / Marches Tropicaux et Mediterraneans 1809 (Paris, Juillet 1980): 3395.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 161
by 1990. This means more dependency on the international
market.
Petrochemical Industries
Petrochemical industries designate mainly the chemi
cal industries derived from hydrocarbons. To obtain
chemical products, it is necessary to have minimum treat
ment of hydrocarbons either by refining oil, or liquefying
natural gas. It is for this reason that we call all
hydrocarbon-derivative industries petrochemical indus
tries. Fertilizers, ammonia, phosphate, nitric acid,
nitrogen, and medical material are the main petrochemical
products of these industries in Algeria.
From 1962 to 1970, Algeria imported an annual average
of 40 million DA of different fertilizer that were needed
for the national market's consumption. However, in 1970,
Algeria stopped importing fertilizers because of a lack of
hard currency. Until 1969, domestic chemical industries
produced for the local market, but sometimes without
reaching the level of production of 1962. The production
of nitrogenous fertilizer was 70.190 tons in 1970; 123,000
tons in 1971; and 107,500 tons in 1973. Nitrogenous
fertilizer is derived from the following products:
ammonia, urea, nitrates, and nitric acid (see Table 36).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 162
TABLE 36
SELECTED PETROCHEMICAL PRODUCTION (Tons)
Products Tons/Year Tons/Day
Ammonia 198.000 1,000 Urea 79,000 400 Nitrates 148.000 500 Nitric acid 119.000 400
SOURCE: This table constructed from data provided in Hammid Temmar, Structure et modele de developpement de 1'economic de 1 'Alg6rie (Alger: SNED, 1983), p. 274.
The power of the private sector in this industry
declined considerably since the national companies kept
the entire hydrocarbon sector under their control.
However, the private sector retained portions of the
production of paint, varnish, soap, plastic, wood, and
shoes made out of plastic and rubber.
There are two main national companies operating in
the branch of chemical industries: SONATRACH, which still
has the upper hand in anything dealing with petrochemistry
and fertilizers, and SNIC (Societe Nationale des Indus
tries Chimiques), which deals with paint, varnish, deter
gents, and maintenance products.
SONATRACH began petrochemical production at Arzew in
1969, turning out ammonia and nitrogenous fertilizer at a
rate of 800,000 tons per year. It was between 1978-1983
that SNIC tried to increase its production to achieve
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 6 3
635,000 tons per year. Despite the expansion of these
industries, the results remained modest until 19 77,
especially in the fertilizer plants. Production, exports,
and domestic consumption of fertilizers and other hydro
carbon by-products are shown in Table 37.
TABLE 37
PRODUCTION, EXPORTS, AND DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION OF FERTILIZERS, 1973-1977 (Thousands of Metric Tons)
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977a
Production Fertilizers 377 276 267 293 460 Ammonia 105 27 27 25 49 Nitric acid 90 50 64 65 108 Exports Fertilizers 4 75 —— 6 Ammonia 52 5 5 8 — Domestic consumption Fertilizers 317 411 447 477 763
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 78.
a. Estimates.
b. Including imports.
In order to abolish the conditions of dependency, and
to achieve economic integration, Algerian policy-makers
decided to expand this industry to a large extend through
the creation of new petrochemical complexes and factories:
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 6 4
1. Ammonia and nitrogenous fertilizer complex at
Arzew. The construction of this complex began in 1966,
and by 1969 it had started production. The total invest
ment was around 500 million DA. It yields 800,000 tons of
nitrogenous fertilizers per year, which are devoted to the
development of agriculture
2. Phosphate fertilizer complex at Annaba. While
the Arzew complex responds to the growing needs of agri
culture with regard to nitrogenous fertilizers, the
complex at Annaba responds to the needs of agriculture
with regard to phosphate fertilizers. The construction of
this complex began in 1969, and by 1972 it began to
produce phosphate fertilizer with a capacity of 500,000
tons per year
In addition, oxygen, nitrogen, and acetylene are
produced in the following three factories: Oran, Annaba,
and Algiers. Matches are manufactured in five factories
that are under SNTA (Societe Nationale des Tabacs et
Allumettes) control in Algiers. The Algerian Central
Pharmacy has one factory for medical materials in El-
Harrach (Algiers), two cotton factories, and one dressing
factory in Ain-Benian (near Algiers). Another medical
complex has recently been completed; it is to be extended
in the future and associated with the medical factory at
Marnia (near Oran).
Since 1972, phosphate fertilizer has been provided by
the new factory at Annaba which produces mixed phosphate
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 6 5
fertilizer. An ammonia and nitrogen fertilizer complex
was established in Arzew and was put into service for
nitrogen in 1970, and for ammonia in 1971. Its production
capacity was 300,000 tons of ammonia, 150,000 tons of
nitrogen, and 120,000 tons of urea, which Algeria cannot
consume. Therefore, ammonia is used to a large extent as
an export commodity. In Skikda, another complex for
plastic material was constructed. This complex has two
main units: one for chlorine (with a capacity of 36,000
tons per year) and another unit for ethylene, with a
capacity of 120,000 tons per year. This complex is
expected to supply the plastic complex of Setif which
produces gamut. Other fertilizer plants and ammonia
complexes are scheduled for the future. For example, a
phosphate plant is to be located in Annaba, and two
plastic plants in Constantine and Annaba.
Conclusion
It is clear from discussing the oil, natural gas and
petrochemical industries, that the hydrocarbons sector is
perceived as a vital source for establishing industriali
zation. Thus, it was given top priority in terms of
budget allocation and investment throughout the different
development plans.
Although the recent application of the hydrocarbons
industry has known some integration from the production
point of view, the integration hoped for by policy-makers
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 6 6
between the economic sectors, such as industry and agri
culture, has yet to occur. So the thesis of De Bernis
which was based mainly on the development of "industri
alizing industries" (hydrocarbons and heavy industry) as a
means for an integrated and independent economic develop
ment has led to an opposite result; that is, the develop
ment of the hydrocarbons sector was achieved at the
expense of other economic sectors, such as agriculture,
infrastructure and light industry, which resulted in (1)
uneven economic development, as we will see in more
details in Chapter VIII; and (2) the formation of a new
social class, the petty bourgeoisie. This new social
class is a product of the industrialization process taking
place in Algeria. The bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie,
who appropriate a large portion of the national income,
and who benefit most from relationships with rich coun
tries, are directly responsible for establishing dependent
development.
As we have already seen, a very substantial propor
tion of the investment in industry to date has gone into
the hydrocarbons industry, which still provides over 80
percent of the country's foreign exchange earnings and as
much as 90 percent of the government's domestic revenues.
In addition, Algeria seems to deal mainly with the capi
talist block. Most of its oil and gas exporting is
carried out with Western Europe and North America (see
Table 25) ; all its LNG plants have been constructed by
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 6 7
European and American firms (see Table 33); its main gas
customers are France, West Germany, Italy, Spain, the
United Kingdom, Belgium, the United States, and Canada;
and finally, most of its ongoing oil and gas contracts are
set up with Western Europe, Japan and North America (U.S.
and Canada). Thus, we can conclude that the hydrocarbons
sector is strongly dependent on the international market
(capitalist block) in terms of export, plant construction,
and contracts.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 168
GRAPH 1
TRENDS IN HYDROCARBONS
Gas Production
Gets Expo: Oil Production
1960 1965 1970 1975 1930 1984
Source: Table 21, P. 127.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER VI
HEAVY INDUSTRY
Introduction
Much criticism was directed at Algeria because of its
concentration on high-technology and heavy industries such
as iron and steel. The same argument was raised regarding
the natural gas industry. However, those who advocated
heavy investment in natural gas based their argument on
the fact that it was the nation's most important resource,
and for that reason it should be exploited despite the
heavy investment required for the necessary processing and
technology. But this argument cannot be applied to heavy
industry.
Although Algeria has large iron ore deposits which
can be exported, these deposits have no great value in the
international market. Unlike the natural gas and LNG
market, in which Algeria is among the world's few major
suppliers, the iron and steel market is dominated by the
experienced and sophisticated producers of the developed
countries who are currently producing more than the world
can consume. This is a problem for Algeria because the
country cannot consume all of its own production, at least
169
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 0
not for the time being. Nevertheless, Algeria has commit
ted itself to processing the nation's raw materials. The
Algerian policy-makers believe that one of the reasons
that third world countries are poor is because they do not
process their raw materials.
During the past two decades, Algeria has been in
creasing its emphasis on heavy, capital intensive indus
try, and neglecting its infrastructure and agriculture.
The reasons for this unbalanced economic development are:
(1) the common third world desire to acquire the prestige
of a steel industry, (2) the desire to process all raw
materials, and (3) the attempt to correct a negative
balance created under the French administration. To some
extent, France built in Algeria a developed infrastructure
of ports, railroads, and roads, but almost no industry.
Under the French, the economy was almost entirely based on
agriculture with few extractive industries (iron ore,
zinc, phosphates and, by the late 1950's, crude oil).
Charles de Gaulle's Constantine Plan of 1958 was an
attempt to change this, but it was not an effective way,
as we have already seen in Chapter II.
Because of this, much emphasis was placed on heavy
industry. In 1977, the unique and powerful Ministry of
Industry and Energy was split into three separate minis
tries: Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Heavy Industry,
and Ministry of Light Industry. This meant that greater
efforts would be devoted to developing the infrastructure
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 1
and other economic sectors; but in reality not much change
occurred in the economic policy of the country, and heavy
industry continued to top the list.
As defined in 1977, the sector of heavy industry is
composed of the following activities:
1. Research and exploitation of mining resources (non-hydrocarbons)
2. Metallurgy of iron, with activities of prelimi nary transformation
3. Metal, mechanic and electric construction
4. Manufacturing of equipment
The heavy industrial sector actually consists of six major
state companies:
SNS Societe Nationale de Siderurgie
SNMC Societe Nationale des Materiaux de Construction
SN Metal Societe Nationale de Constructions Metalligues
SONACOME Societe Nationale de Constructions Mecaniques
SONAREM Societe Nationale de Recherches et d'Exploitation Minieres
SONFLEC Societe Nationale de,Fabrication et de Montage de Materiel Electrique et Electronique
The main activities of each company in the field of
heavy industries are as follows:
SNS: - Metallurgy of iron and primary trans formation Investment realization of metallurgy Metallurgy of non-iron Recuperation of metals (mini metallurgy)
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 2
SNMC: - Cement production Marble production Production and treatment of plaster, bricks, lime and glass
SN METAL: - Metallic construction (tankers) Engineering, assembling and research activities Construction and building products. Metallic products, and metallic packing materials
SONACOME: - Car and bus manufacturing Public works Agricultural machinery Industrial products Bikes and motorcycles Machinery and tools Mechanical equipment and heavy electro machines Engineering heavy industries
SONAREM: - Exploitation of mining Mineral research
SONELEC: - Cables Public telephone sets Electronic industries Electro-chemistry - Maintenance of heavy material
All these national companies, excluding SNMC, represented
in 1977: 107 units of production, 40 units of distribu
tion, 9 units of conversion, DA 11.080 billion of capital
and 105,836 workers.*
Between 1980 and 1985, it was planned that 20 new
enterprises of heavy industry would be created. Some other
projects are under study. For example, a center of heavy
Hammid Temmar, Structures et modele de developpement de l'economie de l'Alqene (Alger: SNED, 1974) , pp. 276-77.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 3
mechanic and electro-mechanic industries, and an engineer
ing company specializing in small-scale heavy industry,
are to be established in the future.
Since the heavy industrial sector contains a variety
of industrial activities, the organization of the national
companies was based sometimes on their type of production,
and sometimes on the kind of technology they used. That
means the organization of the national companies was based
upon the principle of specialization or specialized enter
prises. However, the general trend in organizing national
enterprises is moving toward regional enterprises. These
regional enterprises have been established at the level of
"Wilayas" and "Communes" in order to take care of the
maintenance activities, or final transformation, which
include among others, gas industries, frames, metallic
furniture, nails, screws, elevators, lightings, mainte
nance of mechanic and electric materials (elevators,
telephones), fabrication of parts and accessories, and
small-sized tools.
The Ministry of Heavy Industry controls and coordi
nates the investment amounts among its enterprises. It
assures, in particular, the coherence of technology and
production in this sector in order to meet national
demands. Meanwhile, each enterprise should provide itself
with the qualified and skilled workers through educational
programs, as we will see in chapter IX. Also, it should
develop, within its technical and financial capacity, the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 4
necessary means for research. In general, the production
of this sector is oriented toward the final consumption.
Metallurgical Industries
After independence, the production of metallurgy was
modest, as in many third world countries. For several
years, the production rested under the capacity of metal
lurgical installations. However, during the last few
years, the metallurgical industries witnessed a rapid
growth in terms of output, input and labor force. From
1966 to 1975, the number of workers employed in the metal
lurgical and preliminary transformation industries in- 2 creased from 3,500 to more than 24,000. During the same
period, the number of workers in the metallic, mechanic
and electric industries was double that of workers in
metallurgy. The activities of the metallurgical industry
2 The figures given in this chapter are mainly from the following sources: Tayeb Said-Amer, L 1 industrialisa tion en Alqerie (Paris: Anthropos, 1978); Temmar, Struc tures et modele de d^veloppement, 1974; Jacques Schnetzler, Le deve'loppement algdrien (Paris: Masson, 1981) ; Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York, Chase World Infor mation Corp., 1978); M.E. Benissad, Economie du devel- oppement de l1Alqerie, 1979; Andre Gauthier, L 1Algerie: de'colonialisation, socialisme, industrialisation 1976 (Washington DC: IMF, 1982); Marches Tropicaux et Mediter raneans , No. 1809, 1980; Industry in Algeria, (Algiers: Ministry of Information and Culture, 1969) ; Basic Indus tries , (Algiers: Ministry of Information and Culture, 1971) ; Secretariat D'Etat au Plan, Productions industri- elles et indices de la production industrielle 1969-1975, (Alger: le Bureau du Statistique, 1977); Annuaire statis- tique de 1'Alqerie 1976, (Alger, 1977); Secretariat Social d'Alger, Le developpement economique processus d 1adaptions structurelles, (Alger: SNED, 1968).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 5
mainly depend on two national companies in addition to
SNS: SN Metal and SONACOME.
The national company SNS, the state steel monopoly,
had 26 units of production, three units of distribution,
three units of conversion, four mixed companies, 33,000
workers, and an average capital of DA 4.200 million in
1979. The Algerian state companies are expected to pro
vide profits and employment at the same time. These two
goals usually conflict with each other in western coun
tries. In the case of Algeria, massive unemployment in a
region is to be solved by locating an industrial plant
there. The state company SNS is expected to provide
housing, education, and medical care for its employees.
This makes it extremely difficult to judge the performance
of SNS as a producer of steel. However, despite its broad
responsibilities, SNS has tried to increase its output of
iron and steel products in recent years. Table 38 shows
the increase of Algeria's production of iron and steel
products.
The SNS has a unit which manufactures aluminum and
fabricates oven material in Constantine. Another unit
producing 132,000 tons per year of aluminum is located in
M'sila. A small portion of these products is furnished by
the private sector. The SNS also produces gas bottles at
the Kouba factory in Algiers. Table 39 shows the main
products of SNS.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 176
TABLE 38
OUTPUT OF IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTS, 1973-1977
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977a
Castings 361 275 411 413 440 Rolled steel 183 98 149 341 423 Sheet metal 72 11 33 90 140 Rods and metal sheets 39 43.6 48 297 316 Tubes 53 80 123 106 194
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978) , p. 84.
a. Estimates.
TABLE 39
MAIN METALLURGICAL PRODUCTION (Millions of tons)
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
Cast iron 409 338 394 358 293 Steel —— 69 156 129 Bobbin & hard sheet iron —— 44 96 109 Lead 45 40 37 39 36 All steel tubes 89 76 83 94 105
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979
Cast iron 399 413 389 288 496 Steel 175 284 — 241 462 Bobbin & hard sheet iron 139 221 213 178 266 Lead 48 44 56 60 — All steel tubes 133 118 164 244 253
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement alqerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 112.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 7
The national company SN Metal was once run by French
capital. Since 1968, the company has operated some indus
trial units that maintained a satisfactory level of pro
duction after their nationalization. These units mainly
produce tankers and mechanic equipment. In 1978, SN Metal
added four new units of production. In 1979, its assets
were: 19 units of production, three units of engineering,
civil engineering and assembling, 14,000 workers and DA
800 million of capital. In 1973, the total capacity of
its units of production was around 50,000 tons per year.
In 1977, the capacity of production jumped to 100,000 tons
per year. The following units of production raised their
rate of utilization for the year 1978 as follows: Annaba
and Hussin-dey by 2-3 percent, Oran I by 55 percent, Oran
III (Hassi Ameur) by 15-20 percent. The under-utilization
phenomenon is usually due to the fact that some companies
lack the required professional and skilled labor. Table
40 shows metallic products of SN Metal.
In general, we can make the following two obser
vations :
1. Production is increasing in a rapid manner com
pared to earlier years
2. The increase of production is due essentially to
the creation of new units and high level of investment
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 8
TABLE 40
METALLIC PRODUCTION (Thousands of tons)
1969 1972 1975 1978 1979
Gas bottles _ t 0.5 5.8 Tankers 4.0 1.7 4.2 5.0 65.5 Metallic frames 14.0 24.6 37.2 40.1 — Iron pins, screws, locks 1.0 2.5 1.8 _ Metallic furniture, chains 0.9 0.9 2.4 Trucks3 72.0 393.0 349.0 474.0 335.0
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 115.
a. In units.
Metallurgy is one of the key industries in Algeria.
It is among the "industrializing industries," according to 3 de Berms. The production of iron metallurgy is directed
primarily toward national consumption but, due to the
limited demand by the national market, some of the produc
tion is being exported. However, we should mention that
the national demand for the products is increasing because
of the expansion in construction activities.
Algeria, in an effort to develop its heavy indus
tries, has constructed a number of plants. For example,
3 G.De Bernis, "Deux strategies pour 1'industrialisa tion du Tiers-Monde: les industries industrialisantes et les options algeriennes" in Revue Tiers-Monde XII (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, No. 47, Juillet- September, 1971): 545-47.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 7 9
the El-Hadjar plant (near Annaba) is the largest and most
sophisticated complex of metallurgy in the third world.
Its purpose is to supply the Algerian industry with cast
iron, steel plate, steel tubing, pipe, flats, and cold-
rolled steel. A broad range of foreign companies have
engaged in its construction besides the French: the
Soviets constructed a steel mill; the Italians installed a
seamless pipe plant and hot rolling mill; and the West
Germans built a pipe plant. The El-Hadjar complex is
composed of four main divisions:
1. Melting division. This division began to produce
in 1969 with a production capacity of 450,000 tons per
year
2. Steel works division. The completion of this
division was scheduled for 1969 but was delayed, and it
was not until 1972 that it started to produce. Its pro
duction capacity is 500,000 tons per year.
3. Flattening mills division. This division was
completed in 1972 and has a production capacity of 0.5
million tons per year of finished products, the equivalent
of 1 million tons of liquid steel. The flattening mills
contract, worth 100 million DA, was concluded in September
1967 between the Italian firm Innocenti and the SNS
4. Pipes division. This division produces oil and
gas pipes. It consumes 80,000 iron sheets per year. Most
of the finished products are directed to local markets
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8 0
The El-Hadjar plant has absorbed 2 billion dollars in
investment capital in the first decade since its construc
tion. It is a complete complex of metallurgy which pro
cesses raw material (iron ore, coke) into products direct
ly usable by other industries. For example, pipes, gas
bottles, steel for mechanic industry, and steel plates are
produced for foreign industry. The plant has a productive
capacity of 2 million tons per year, but in 19 78 it
achieved a production capacity of only 400,000 tons, due
to the low demand on the national market and a shortage of
technological know-how.
In 1978, a Japanese-German consortium (Kawasaki,
Heavy Industries Ltd., C. Itoh and Company Ltd., and
Demage A.G.) won a 244 million dollar contract to build a
steel converter plant at El-Hadjar. This plant, designed
to produce 600,000 tons of steel annually, was completed
in 1981. Another steel complex with an annual capacity of
10-12 million tons located in Oran is still under study.
Another plant, which will produce special steel with a
capacity of 150,000 tons per year, is to be built by the
Swedish company Bofors at a cost of 120 million dollars.
In addition to steel, SNS has other operations: at
Ghazaouet, it runs a zinc electrolysis plant with a capa
city of 40,000 tons per year that was completed in 1974;
at M'sila, the Soviets built an aluminum electrolysis
plant.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8 1
The central question concerning heavy industry is
whether it can compete, or whether steel can be produced
cheaply enough to be sold at a profit in competitive world
markets. In the case of Algeria, this does not seem
likely, at least for the time being, because of the inten
sive use of foreign capital and foreign expertise in this
industry.
Mechanic Industries
The mechanic industry is a very recent branch of
activity in Algeria. In 1962, Algeria inherited two units
of automobile assembly: the truck builder Berliet at
Rouiba, and the auto producer Renault at El-Harrach
(Algiers) . Renault was created by the French for small
car construction as a result of the implementation of the
Constantine Plan. After independence, Renault became a
state company. Its theoretical productive capacity was
12,500 cars per year, a level supposed to be reached in
1971-72. However, most of the parts were imported from
France. In 1970, Algeria's Renault transferred its activ
ities to Oran, where it began to produce at a theoretical
capacity of 25,000 cars per year. Most of the cars are
the R6 type (see Table 41).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8 2
TABLE 41
PRODUCTION OF CARS AND BUSES (Units)
1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1979
Cars 1,647 3,258 1,690 4,885 6,113 5,850 6,151
Buses 8 116 183 337 145 450 464
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le deVeloppement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 117.
Among the Constantine Plan's projects, SADAB (Societe
Africaine des Automobiles Berliet) has created an assembly
line factory at Rouiba. It began its activities in 1960
with a production capacity of 1,800 cars per year. After
1970, Berliet sold its majority interest in Algeria to the
national company SONACOME. This former Berliet plant in
Rouiba is currently producing trucks under a license
arrangement with Berliet. In 1978, the plant reached a
capacity of 4,000 trucks a year.
The national company SONACOME is the core of this
industry. In 1979, it had 19 units of production, 32
units of distribution, one mixed company, 28,720 workers,
and capital of DA 4,047 million. Almost 10 percent of
Algeria's produced steel is bought by SONACOME. It uses
the metal to manufacture machines, tools, tractors, agri
cultural equipment, trucks, and engines. SONACOME enjoys
a monopoly on the imports and exports of all these items,
all other heavy equipment, and automobile and related
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8 3
parts. Because of its extensive monopoly, SONACOME devel
oped very rapidly. Today it is involved largely in the
purchase, distribution and maintenance of imported machin
ery. Like other state companies, its ultimate goal is
domestic production. Different firms have provided of
fers, namely Fiat and Renault, but under present condi
tions, Algeria has not made any move to respond.
Up to the present, SONACOME has established the
following basic industrial plants across the country:
1. In 1972, a cycle and motorcycle plant was built
at Guelma. It produces 15,000 bicycles, 2,000
motorcycles, and 5,000 engines a year
2. In 1973, a tractor and diesel engine factory was
built in Constantine, and in 1973-74 it began to produce
the first tractor engines. Its production capacity was
9,500 engines per year, 4,000 wheel-tractors, and 1,000
Caterpillar tractors. Table 32 shows the production of
tractors and car motors
3. In 1978, a complex of agricultural machines was
constructed at Sidi-Bel-Abbas. It has the capacity to
produce 17,000 machines in thirty different categories
4. In 1978, another complex for casting and steel
parts was constructed in Berrouaghia. It produces valves
for the national company SONATRACH
5. A complementary assembly factory for producing
tractors and engines was built at Rouiba
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8 4
6. Two new truck plants were built: one at Setif
with a capacity of 20,000 trucks a year, and one at
Tiaret, with a capacity of 15,0t)0 trucks a year
7. A diesel engine plant at Ain Oussera, with a
capacity of 106,000 engines a year, was established
8. An equipment plant at Bordj Manaiel (near Con
stantine) has also been built! It produces plumbing
equipment, nuts and bolts, and precision items
9. A new, projected automobile complex to be con
structed in East Oran for small cars is under study. Its
capacity is to exceed 200,000 dars per year, which Algeria
cannot absorb for the time being
TABLE 42
PRODUCTION OF TRACTORS AND CAR MOTORS, 1974-1979
1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979
Tractors 799 1,562 1,834 2,839 3,724 4,883
Motors 867 1,792 4,845
SOURCE: Jacques Schetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 118.
The national company SONACOME works in collaboration
with European manufacturers (e.g., Berliet for heavy cars,
Deutz for the engines). The company also depends, for its
production, on foreign professional and skilled workers,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8 5
including a few Algerians who have been trained in Europe
for the same skills.
Until now, West German firms won most contracts, and
they are the best at building mechanic industries in
Algeria. DIAG (Deutsche Industrieanlagen Gesellschaft) is
a prime consortium from West Germany which has won several
contracts in the mechanic tool industry. Liebherr-
Hydraulikbagger has managed a 340 million dollar contract
for public works and industrial machinery. Kloechner-
Humboldt-Deutz has worked out a deal for a tractor plant.
West Germany's M.A.N. has completed a technical study for
an industrial complex in which truck assembly will be
integrated with a large diesel engine plant. The success
of the Germans in dealing with Algeria for building its
industry is due to two things:
1. Their reputation for skill and efficiency in this
particular industry
2. The readiness of the Germans to provide some form
of financing for the projects they want to carry out
The government has numerous projects to finance from the
loans it receives from public and private banks in the
West. Therefore, the Planning Secretariat has instructed
the national companies to favor foreign companies that can
finance the projects in which they will be involved. The
failure of SONACOME's relations with U.S. vehicle compan
ies was due to this financial reason.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 186
Since 1977, however, SONACOME has become anxious for
U.S. technology. It signed a 100 million dollar contract
with Ingersoll-Rand for a plant in Ain-Samra. This con
tract involved the construction of a plant intended to
turn out 3,000 compressors and 1,000 compactors annually
by 1980. SONACOME has concluded other contracts with
American Motors for Jeeps, and with Caterpillar for an
annual production of 1,000 bulldozers. It is estimated
that Algeria needs 15,000 Jeeps and an average of 50,000
automobiles per year. In 1976, car imports were increased
to 20,000 units. Demand has been high for Volkswagen,
Fiat, Renault and Peugeot.
The tremendous potential of Algeria's hydrocarbons is
matched by a corresponding demand for foreign participa
tion. Despite the investment correction which seems to be
in favor of light industry, agriculture and infrastruc
ture, the heavy industry sector continued to consume large
amounts of capital investments through the second four
year plan (1974-1977). During this plan, SONACOME expect
ed to spend between 1.5 to 2.5 billion dollars and earn
more than 1 billion dollars in sales revenues.
Construction Material Industries
In principle, the third industrializing industry is
the construction material industry — more precisely,
cement. After independence, the production of construc
tion material strongly declined. The 1960 level of 1
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 8 7
million tons of cement was not achieved until 1976, and
not in all articles.
This explains the weak investment in this industrial
branch during the first decade following independence. At
the beginning of 1968, the cement factories were national
ized and put under the control of SNMC (Societe Nationale
des Materiaux de Construction). In addition to cement,
this industry provides the country with different con
struction materials such as plaster, lime, bricks, and
glass. The increase of cement production was due to the
newly constructed factories and to the increase in cement
imports. After 1976, the construction industry mush
roomed, because it was producing materials sorely needed
by this rapidly growing country and at a lower cost than
the imported variety from France.
By the end of 1979, SNMC had more than 28 units. It
controlled 71 units of production (8 cement, 19 bricks, 14
brick-tiles, 1 lime, 4 plaster, 3 sanitary, 1 tubes, 5
aminantine, 3 crockery, etc.). For example, the cement
factory in Zahara has a capacity of 450,000 to 1 million
tons per year. In Meftah, where the old cement units were
constructed, a new complementary cement factory with a
capacity of 500,000 tons per year was built. To this list
can be added the factories at Bejaia and Had jar, which
have been working at a capacity of 1 million tons per year
since 1976. Another cement project includes additional
units of production, bringing the production capacity to
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. -1 8 8
7.5 million tons per year. These units were partly work
ing at the end of 1979.
The national company SNMC covers all cement produc
tion and a majority of the production of marble, open
marble, plaster, tiles, bricks and others. The crockery
at Guelma, the first of its kind in Algeria, which was
constructed by the Chinese, began production in 1972. We
add to this list the glass factory that was built in
East-Oran. To a great extent this factory depends in its
activities on the SNIV (Societe Nationale des Industries
du Verre) which was created in 1966. Despite all these
efforts, Algeria could not cope with the increasing de
mands of the local market. Table 43 shows the main pro
ducts of construction material.
Mining Industries
When the Ministry of Industry and Energy was split
into three parts, mining concerns were given to the new
Ministry of Heavy Industry and put under the management of
the state company for mining and mining exploration,
SONAREM.
The French became interested in Algerian coal as
early as 1917. Because of transportation costs, coal
became much more expensive than oil and natural gas in the
1950s; thus coal production dropped from 300,000 tons in
1955 to 15,000 tons in 1962.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. — 42 14 37 34 Cement Plate 124. 42 19 46 104 — 11 — — Glass
88— 12 34 89 108 100 899 914 algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. TABLE 43 38 445 129 17 30 19 194 66 (Thousands of tons) Le developpement MAJOR PRODUCTS OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL Plaster Lime Bricks Tile Schnetzler, 928 67 43 458 117 13 25 601731 11 47 17 308 924 87 60 488 79 2,697 83 13 916 3,773 93 13 1,062 111 86 489 66 15 SOURCE: Jacques 1979 1976 1,695 127 33 1978 19721974 927 941 86 74 36 508 1970 1963 1967 1961 1960 Year Cement
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 9 0
The national company SONAREM mines and sells phos
phates, lead, zinc, iron pyrites, and iron ore, most of
which come from the Ouenza mine (in northeastern Algeria).
In 1979, SONAREM had 33 units of production, four units of
distribution, one mixed company, 14,695 workers, and
capital of DA 633 million. Before 1980, SONAREM planned
to spend a quarter of a billion dollars on mineral explor
ation. Table 44 shows the production and export of miner
als in Algeria.
Eighty percent of the iron ore production had been
exported to Eastern Europe. Before the exploitation of
the huge deposits at Tindouf was put into operation, the
percentage of the exported ore dropped because of the
local consumption by SNS for building local railways. The
production of iron ore increased from 2.8 million tons in
1976 to 3.8 million tons in 1977. In 1978, SNS awarded a
33 million dollar contract to Bechtel for preparatory
development of an iron mine at Gara-Djebilet. This sta
tion was linked directly with the Mediterranean coast by
railways which were designed to transport 20 million tons
of iron ore annually.
There are about half a billion tons of phosphates at
Djebel Onk (near the Tunisian border), of which about
800,000 tons are extracted annually. Exports of phos
phates have risen considerably since 1975; Hungary alone
purchases about 100,000 tons annually. Total phosphate
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 191
TABLE 44
PRODUCTION AND EXPORT OF MINERALS,a 1973-1977 (Thousands of tons)
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977°
Iron ore Production 3,184 3,990 3,200 2,800 3,800 Exports 1,966 3,245 ------1,800 2,820
Phosphates Production 604 797 940 741 1,300 Exports 285 418 ------522 872
Coal
Production ------10 11 7 ------
Zinc, lead, copper concentrates Production 32 25 30 19 28 Exports 26 13 — 24 —
Mercury Production0 13.2 13.5 28 31 30
SOURCE: Kramer, Algeria (New York : Chase World Informa- tion Corp., 1978), p. 91.
a. Excluding hydrocarbons.
b. Estimates.
c. In thousands of containers, each weighing 34 kg.
production jumped from 741,000 tons in 1976 to 1.3 million
tons in 1977. These phosphate deposits are also an impor
tant source of raw material for Algeria's own rapidly
expanding fertilizer industry, particularly at SONATRACH's
Annaba plant.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 9 2
SONAREM has also achieved its goal of increasing
annual production of mercury to 900 tons. This quantity
is about 10 percent of total world production. A mercury
mine at Ismail began production in 1971; in 1978, the
country was producing 1,000 tons yearly. Algeria's larg
est lead and zinc mine is at El-Abed (near the Moroccan
border). El-Abed provides the country with all lead
production and 60 percent of zinc production. In 1977,
the American Drave Corporation won a 7 million dollar
contract for the further development of lead mining at
El-Abed. By 1980, lead production increased to 30,000
tons, and zinc production increased to 70,000 tons.
Most uranium deposits are found in Hoggar, far to the
south. SONAREM has called six foreign companies to con
duct preliminary studies for the exploitation of uranium
ore. Uranium reserves are estimated at 12,000 tons.
Although it was hoped that commercial production would
begin by 1982, due to some problems the commercial plan
was delayed. The first problem was that of transporta
tion; the deposits of uranium are located at a distance of
1,500 miles in the south of Algeria in an isolated area.
The second problem was that of the climate. Water is
needed in the mining process, but this area is always dry.
Despite these obstacles, Algeria is believed to be the
first country in the Middle East and North Africa to have
taken steps in developing uranium deposits. The present
goal is to export, but at the same time, to prepare the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 9 3
deposits so that they can supply the nuclear reactors
which Algeria plans to purchase in the future, although no
decision has been made so far.
Electric Industries
Although electronics are not considered heavy indus
try, we will include it in this discussion simply because
it is linked directly to the electric industries, and
because electronic products are being produced under the
same national company management, SONELEC (Societe Nation-
p ale de Fabrication et de Montage de Materiel Electrique et
t Electronique).
At independence, Algeria inherited a few private
enterprises in electric manufacturing. After the nation
alization of these enterprises, the national company
SONELEC took over almost the entire market and production
of this industry. Besides the inherited enterprises,
SONELEC created two new large complexes which began pro
duction in 1978. The first, in Tizi-Ouzou, produces
200,000 refrigerators, 100,000 ovens, 200,000 small
stoves, and 25,000 electric razors. The second, in Sidi-
Bel-Abbas, is a large state factory which produces 240,000
television sets per year, 400,000 radios, 50,000 auto
radios, 30,000 telephone sets, and 40,000 cassettes.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 194
There are an additional five essential production
factories. The first (near Algiers) produces air condi
tioners; the second, in Blida, produces ovens, refrigera
tors, and electric razors; the third, in Constantine,
produces radiators, radios, television and telephone sets
(the production of these consumer goods is still under
foreign license); the fourth, in Mohammedia, can provide
26 million standard lamps; and the fifth, in Tlemcen,
manufactures telephone material. This last factory was
constructed with the help of ITT (International Telephone
and Telegraph) of Spain. The most important electric
center is the one found in Ras-Djinet (a wilaya of Tizi-
Ouzou). This electric center is composed of four units of
production, the first of which will be completed by 1985.
The completion of the entire center is scheduled for 1986.
This project was financed by a German and Australian
consortium at the rate of 85 percent.
In 1979, SONELEC had 10 units of production, one unit
of distribution, two units of maintenance, one public
works unit, 15,421 workers, and capital of DA 1,400 mil
lion. The national company SONELEC has the same problems
that SONACOME has: both have management difficulties in
operating the mechanical and electric industries in a
professional fashion, because both still lack qualified,
skilled and professional staff and are dependent on for
eign expertise for most operations. The lack of full
integration between branches of the industrial sector has
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 9 5
permitted foreign companies to provide Algeria with equip
ment which its own national companies should be capable of
providing.
Conclusion
The facts discussed above confirm the dominance of
this sector in the national economy. Excluding the hydro
carbons industries, heavy industry alone represented 34.9
percent of the total industrial production in 1975. This
percentage has been increased in recent years. Algeria's
main development efforts to date have been in industry
(including hydrocarbons) which has received over 60 per
cent of all the investment made since the start of the
first plan (the three-year plan of 1967-69). Algeria is
moving toward greater promotion of capital-intensive
industry, rather than large scale labor-intensive indus
try.
According to Benissad, who measured the degree of
foreign dependency of each branch of industry in accor
dance with the rate of imports of each branch for the year
1974, the branches of heavy industry are indeed dependent.
For example, the branch of construction material indus
tries is strongly dependent. The rate of dependency is
almost 50.9 percent. This rate of foreign dependency has
been increasing during recent years because of the in
crease in cement demands. It will be even more dependent
when all national demands have been satisfied. The
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 9 6
branches of metallurgy, mechanics, and electric indus
tries, which are responsible for importing machines and
equipment needed for rapid industrialization, are strongly
dependent on foreign countries. The coefficient of for- 4 eign dependency has reached 76.3 percent (see Graph 2).
Therefore, the thesis of De Bernis which indicates
that the development of heavy industry (including hydro
carbons) , which mainly produces the means of production
rather than consumption goods, will lead to an independent
national economy and industrialization, is not valid.
Concentration upon developing heavy industry has led to
two results. First, the neglect of agriculture and infra
structure has created uneven development; secondly, the
national economy and industrialization have become more
dependent on the neo-colonialist economy, further inte
grating themselves into the international capitalist
system.
4 M.E. Benissad, Economie du developpement de 1 'Algerie, p. 140.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 197
GRAPH 2
FOREIGN DEPENDENCY BY INDUSTRIAL BRANCHES, 1974
80
70
60
(O 50 ft 3 40 1 2 30
20
10
0 1 Y////SA CHE CM AGRO TEX
Source: Previous tables provided in chapters VI and VII.
MME: Metallurgy, mechanics and electric industries CHE: Chemical industries CM : Construction material industries AGRO:Agro-alimentary industries TEX: Textile industries LS : Leather and shoes
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 198
GRAPH 3
TRENDS IN MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION
Tractors
» / Cement // ' Metal lurcjic ' Production
Cars
Buses
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 Source: Previous figures provided in chapter VI.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER VII
LIGHT INDUSTRY
Introduction
The construction of light industry is viewed as
necessary from a political and economic point of view. A
balance between heavy industry, on the one hand, and light
industry, infrastructure, and agriculture, on the other
hand, was emphasized after the Boumediene regime because
the previous emphasis on heavy industry affected the
quality of Algerian life in many ways. However, there has
been no major change in the industrialization policy,
which continues to give priority to heavy industry. The
development of the means of production in this sense does
not contradict the establishment of light industry. On
the contrary, it will enhance the productive machinery for
consumer goods. The creation of light industry is neces
sary to achieve this objective. The development of light
industry in Algeria has been aimed at satisfying the
essential needs of society with regard to clothing, shoes,
sugar, flour, and bread.
As defined in 1977, the sector of light industry
consists of the following major activities:
199
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 200
1. Agro-alimentary industry (sugar, grain, crops,
preserves, beverages, and transformation of cereals)
2. Textiles
3. Tobacco and matches
4. Wood and paper
5. Leather and shoes
The main enterprises of light industry are as follows:
SOGEDIA Societe Nationale de Gestion et de Developpement des Industries du Sucre
SNSEMPAC Societe Nationale de Semoulerie, Meunerie, Fabrique de Pates Alimentaire et Couscous
SONITEX Societe Nationale des Industries Textiles
SNTA Societe Nationale des Tabacs et Allumettes
SNLB Societe Nationale des Industries du Liege et des Bois
SONIPEC Societe Nationale de Industries de Peaux et des Cuirs
These national enterprises run more than 430 units of
production, and employ about 120,000 workers. The Minis
try of Light Industry does not have the capacity, in terms
of capital, to cover all enterprises that were placed
under its management, but it assures technical coherence
among them and the major part of investment for the sec
tor.
Agro-alimentary Industries
Algeria's largest branch of light industries is
agro-alimentary manufacturing. Under French rule, the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 201
agro-alimentary industry constituted the bulk of manufac
turing in Algeria. It was not damaged as severely as
other industries, but it did not grow much during the
recovery period from 1966 to 1969.
TABLE 45
OUTPUT OF FOODSTUFFS, BEVERAGES, AND TOBACCO PRODUCTS, 1973-1977 (Thousands of metric tons)
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977a
Wheat flour & semolina 1,283 1,352 1,400 1,480 1,572 Oils 102 116 146 152 176 Sugar 118 143 111 146 186 Margarine 14 4 6 8 — Fruit juices & preserves . 13 15 13 22 45 Mineral water 335 462 642 696 802 Soft drinks 81 177 274 490 689 Cigarettes 8 9 10 10 22 Tobacco 16 17 19 20 23 Beer — 508 569 568 584
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp.), p. 98.
a. Estimates.
b. In thousands of hectoliters.
The alimentary industries have been consciously
developed in Algeria in order to satisfy the needs of the
population. This industry, apart from processing the
national agrarian production, also treats some imported
raw material such as sugar and tobacco. Since colonial
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 202
times, alimentary industries treat mainly the production
of the country: tobacco, fish, oil, fruits, vegetables,
different kinds of cereals, and some imported articles
such as sugar, chocolate, tobacco, cereal and food for
cattle.
The branch of alimentary industries is dominated by
the state. Out of 23,300 workers, 14,200 are employed in
the state sector, which is 61 percent compared to 8,172
workers in the private sector (35%) . The remainder con
stitutes collective enterprises with self-management
(autogestion). The state units of production are located
all over the national territory: 38.3 percent are estab
lished in the Algiers region (in the north), 38.8 percent
in the Oran region (in the west), and 22.8 percent in the
Constantine region (in the east) (see Appendix B).
Algeria's two largest agro-industrial enterprises are
SOGEDIA and SN SEMPAC. SOGEDIA maintains full control
over the sugar production in the country. Before indepen
dence, there was no single factory for sugar processing.
Sugar production began only with the construction of the
first refinery at Khemis-Miliana in 1965. It began its
production in 1966. The first three-year plan (1967-1969)
permitted the extension of this factory to reach a produc
tive capacity of 20,000 tons of sugar. National consump
tion in 1966 was estimated at 200,000 tons per year. It
appeared necessary to put into operation new units of
production. The first four-year plan (1970-1973) helped
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 0 3
in establishing some new sugar refineries. For example,
one was built in Mostagenam with a capacity of 80,000 tons
per year in 1972, and another one in Guelma in 1974.
SOGEDIA continued to expand its activities, and by 1978 it
began to run a number of sugar refineries with annual
productive capacities exceeding a quarter of a million
tons, in addition to a sugar-packaging plant in Oran.
Under license, SOGEDIA also bottles Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola,
Fanta Orange and the famous beer, "33". Table 46 shows
sugar production for the period 1970-1979.
TABLE 46
SUGAR PRODUCTION (Thousands of tons)
1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1979
Sugar production 4.5 2.1 3.0 3.0
Refined sugar 15.0 56.0 49.0 107.0 103.0 101.0
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981) p. 138.
In 1975, the beer industry and all concerns dealing
with wine and alcohol were taken on by ONCV (Office Nation
ale de Commercialisation des Produits Vini-Viticoles)
which was created in 1968. SNEMA (Societe Nationale des
Eaux Minerales d'Algerie) exploits three main sources from
which it sells pure water in both plastic and glass
bottles: Ben Haroun (gaseous water) in Kabylie, Mouzaia
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 0 4
in Mitidja (gaseous water), and Saida in Hamman Boukhara
(pure mineral water). Mineral water, lemonades, soda,
Coca-Cola, Orange, fruit syrup and apricot beverages are
manufactured and sold in Algeria as in any place in the
world. Algerians are considered among the largest consum
ers of soft drinks, coffee and tea.
SN SEMPAC, important in a nation which seems to
subsist on couscous, produces various forms of pasta and
semolina at more than 100 different mills. Cereal proces
sing, in terms of volume is the largest group of alimen
tary industries. In 1963, there were 73 mills: nine
grouped into two factories, one for flour and the other
for semolina; 24 for pure flour; 21 for pure semolina; and
19 were mixed mills for flour and semolina. In 1964, the
flour mills, and pasta and couscous manufacturing were
nationalized and organized into national enterprises, then
reorganized into regional units, and finally, in 1966,
regrouped under one unified national company, SN SEMPAC.
In 1969, the national production reached 800,000 tons of
flour and semolina. Because of the growth of population
and the increase in demand, SN SEMPAC established six new
mills in Blida, Setif, Batna, Boura, El-Asnam, and Sidi-
Bel Abbas. In addition, three units of couscous were
constructed in Setif, Blida and Sidi-Bel Abbas. In 1971,
Algeria continued to enlarge flour mills, but the quality
of production is still below average, which has led most
people to seek imported flour despite its high price. The
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 0 5
state controls the entire production of flour, wheat,
semolina, pasta, and couscous. However, the private
sector maintained a good place in the secondary processing
of cereals (rice, corn), of which Algeria did not consume
much. Since domestic agriculture cannot regularly provide
enough wheat for local consumption, Algeria imports a
great part of the demand for wheat from abroad, especially
Canada and the United States. Table 47 shows cereal
processing from 1963-1979.
TABLE 47
CEREAL PROCESSING (Thousands of tons)
1963 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1979
Flour & wheat 456 838 1,033 1,376 1,489 1,483 1,418
Semolina, couscous, and pasta 25 38 45 53 62 69 68
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 136.
All manufacturing of olive oil and vegetable and
animal fat were placed under the state company SNCG (Soci
ete Nationale des Corps Gras). Since 1971, SNCG makes
margarine, soap, and also produces and commercializes
Zitoune Oil and Safia Oil (pure oil). Table 48 shows the
production of fat matters.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 206
TABLE 48
PRODUCTION OF FAT MATTER (Thousands of tons)
1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1979
Refined olive oil 78.6 98.9 117.6 153.0 196.1 203.1
Vegetable fat and margarine -- 4.5 4.6 8.5 11.6 12.6
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson: 1981), p. 137.
Algeria produces very little milk. Most milk is
imported from Europe and Canada in forms of condensed and
powdered milk. ONALAIT (Office Nationale du I.ait) assures
the commercialization of a large part of the production.
Until 1977, ONALAIT possessed six units of production
(with a capacity of 900,000 litres per day) in Algiers,
Annaba, Oran, Draa-Ben Khedda, Constantine, and Tlemcen.
The production was further supported by adding the fac
tories of Sidi-Bel Abbas, Boudouaou and Constantine-II.
Total capacity reached 1,300,000 litres per day.
The preserves industry (vegetable, fruits, juice,
jams, etc.) was taken over for some time by the private
sector, then was placed under the state sector through
SOALCO (Societe Algerienne de Conserves). National pro
duction has not covered the population’s needs, so the
country is obliged to import a large quantity of preserved
tomato and the like for local consumption. Thus, this
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 0 7
branch of industry is concerned more with imported prod
ucts than national production.
Textile Industries
Before independence, the textile industry was not
well developed. It was limited to small traditional work
shops . Even such small workshops and artisans were
crushed by French colonists. Algeria at that time import
ed almost all of its needs from France. In 1954, textile
production did not cover more than 8 percent of total
local consumption. It was one of the industries that did
not benefit from the Constantine Plan.
At the time of independence, the Algerian textile
market represented a consumption of 120 million square
meters of cloth. Algeria had to create the conditions
that would enable it to satisfy its needs, to end the
pressure of imports, and to utilize local labor power.
The government established the state company, SONITEX, in
1966. It also established another five large projects
which were entrusted to the state company SONITEX. Table
49 presents the five projects and their capacity of pro
duction.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 0 8
TABLE 49
ALGERIAN TEXTILE PRODUCTS, 1966-1967 (Millions square meters)
Project Theoretical Number of Location Annual Capacity Workers
Oued-Tlelat 11.6 592 Batna 10.0 597 Draa-Ben Khada 19.5 1700 El-Kerma 8.5 825 Constantine 6.5 365 Total 56.1 3979
SOURCE: This table constructed from data provided in H. Temmar, Structures et modele de developpement de 1'econo mic de l'Alg£rie (Alger: SNED, 1974), p. 285.
In 1966, the unit of Oued-Tlelat (near Oran) was
designed to produce cotton thread and bonded fiber with a
capacity of 2,050 tons per year. In the same year, the
unit of Batna was planned to make cotton thread and bonded
fiber with a capacity of 1,800 tons per year. In 1967,
the unit of Draa-Ben Khoda, a cotton spinning mill, was
designed to produce 18 million square meters of material
and about 1.5 million square meters of finished cloth and
shirts. In addition, two small weaving units were created
in Tlemcen and Tiaret. A sponge factory was created at
Hussin-dey (Algiers). With a total production of 56.1
million square meters of fabrics and cotton thread, the
three-year plan (1967-1969) planned to elevate this total
to 90 million square meters by extending the units of
Draa-Ben Kedda and Batna. The first four-year plan (1970-
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 0 9
1973) continued the effort to develop this industry. It
tried to complete what was left unfinished by the three-
year plan and to create new units of production. For
example, a wool complex in Tiaret was launched in 1970, to
be finished in 1974.
In 1976, SONITEX owned and operated 36 mills, of
which 27 were clothing factories. It employed 16,000
workers who produced annually 18,000 tons of yarn, 60
million meters of cloth, 1.3 million pieces of upholstery,
and 7.5 million articles of clothing. However, the state
sector still could not meet local demand. Therefore, the
government gave permission to the private sector to invest
and participate in the development of this industry. 179
small private spinning mills were established in Tlemcen,
Oran, Tizi-Ouzou, Ghardia, Biskra, and Constantine,
employing 5470 workers. Since 1978, the private sector
has been an important factor in textile production. It
consists of existing enterprises and units newly created
by individuals after independence.
Presently, the textile industry provides various
kinds of threads and fabrics, cotton threads, bonded
fiber, pure or mixed wool threads, blankets, carpets, lace
and embroidery. The theoretical capacity of production
may achieve a growth of production that would allow
Algeria to halve its imports, with the exception of some
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 210
articles. Algerian textile products are generally expen
sive and are of average quality (shirts are of high quali
ty, being the exception). The quality of production has
in many cases affected the size of production. This is
why many textile factories are still under-utilized.
Despite this, Algeria continued to expand further the
activities of its textile enterprises. In 1980, SONITEX
planned to build 25 more mills than the 36 it had operated
since 1976. The company expects that by 1980 it should be
able to produce 80,000 tons of yarn annually, 127 million
linear meters of cloth, 36 million meters of silk, 14
million meters of jute, 3.5 million meters of velvet, 120
million meters of knitwear, 13 million articles of cloth
ing, and 2,000 tons of cotton thread, in addition to the
several contracts that Algeria is conducting with foreign
companies in order to develop its industry.
Italian firms have been especially successful in
winning contracts to help Algeria build its textile indus
try. The major reason is that Algeria did not want to
become overly dependent on France, West Germany, or the
United States.
In 1977, the Italian firm Generale Impianti Castoldi
signed a $91 million contract with SONITEX for building a
cotton thread factory with a capacity of 2,000 tons per
year. Two other Italian firms, Marzotto and Iteco-
Lanerossi, in partnership with Famatex of West Germany,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 211
have signed a $125 million contract to build wool proces
sing and polyester plants. Another Italian firm, SNAM
Progetti, won a $200 million contract to engineer a weav
ing and finishing unit at a textile complex in Khenchela.
Japan's Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. won a $100
million contract to supply and install a turnkey plant at
Nedroma that will provide 1,200 jobs and produce 3,250,000
meters of fabric, in addition to dying and finishing an
additional 5 million meters of cloth produced at Algerian
mills. This plant was to be operational in 1982. Another
Japanese firm, Marubeni and Fuji Spinning, is building a
$40 million mill at Kherata which will employ 400 people
and process 18 million meters of cotton and fabrics. A
third Japanese company, Toyo Kogyo, has contracted the
national company, SONITEX, to supply $1.5 million of
equipment for a silk factory at Telemcen.
In 1977, two Belgian firms, Sybetra and Union
Cotonniere, were engaged in building a cotton mill for
SONITEX at Laghouat which was designed to produce 2,610
tons of thread and 8 million meters of cloth per year by
1980, employing 840 workers. In 1977, a turnkey contract
was won by a Franco-Belgian consortium (Agach-Willot and
Sybetra) to build a factory at Akbou to produce velvet,
employing 1,300 workers. Once this factory is put into
operation, Algeria will no longer be dependent upon import
ed velvet. Table 50 presents textile production 1973-
1977.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 212
TABLE 50
TEXTILE PRODUCTION, 1973-1977
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977a
Clothb 39 38 42 45 51 Yarn0 d 11 11 13 14 16 Bedspreads 820 800 Ready-made, clothing 3,657 3,335 3,887 8,700 7,600
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 104.
NOTE: Original source: Government of Algeria. No further details given.
a. Estimates.
b. In millions of meters.
c. In thousands of metric tons.
d. In thousands.
Tobacco Industries
Algeria's tobacco manufacturing was among the first
industries to be nationalized by the state. In 1963, the
state company SNTA (Societe Nationale des Tabacs et Allu-
mettes) was established. It runs several tobacco factor
ies and more than 25 warehouses with production concen
trated at Laghouat, Biskra, Blida, Constantine and
Mostagenem. In 1978, SNTA signed a contract with a Swiss
firm, Rinsoz and Ormond, to build another four plants.
One was constructed in Algiers, one in Oran, and two in
Constantine. Although these plants were designed to
process tobacco leaves, they also produce some cigarettes.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 1 3
It should be noted that Algeria managed to convert
its cigarette production to 90 percent filter-tip in 1978,
compared with 41 percent in 1965. Production increased
from 5,000 tons in 1965 to 22,000 tons in 1977. Cigars do
not constitute a large market in Algeria, but there are
two other significant tobacco products besides cigarettes:
chewing tobacco and snuff. Combined production of these
two products grew from 2,334 tons in 1968 to 5,000 tons in
1977. Match production rose from 272 million boxes in
1965 to more than half a billion boxes in 1977. SNTA also
equipped a cigarette factory at Kroubs and three match
factories. Its expansion program is designed to expand
production and to transfer tobacco industry to areas where
unemployment is high. The Algiers region, for example,
now produces 80 percent of the nation's cigarettes. This
is due to the concentration of tobacco industries in the
Algiers region, as noted in Appendix B.
Paper and Wood Industries
Algeria inherited from the Colonial period only a few
factories of paper production — for example, the factory
of Baba-Ali (near Algiers) which began production in 1950
with a theoretical capacity of 20,000 tons of paper;
Oran-exCalempo, which used to make bags; Al-Arbaa, which
makes packing boxes; and Oued Smar, which manufactures
bags. After independence, Algeria constructed five new
paper units, which were entrusted to the state company
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 1 4
SONIC (Societe Nationale des Industries de la Cellulose).
These units of production are as follows:
1. El Harrach (boxes and packing paper)
2. Souk Ahras (silk paper and hard paper)
3. Mostaganem (Mixed Alfa, white and printed paper
for writing)
4. Saida (boxes and different bags)
5. Bordj-bou Arriridj (paper bags)
The Mostaganem factory has a capacity of 66,000 tons
of pulp and 33,000 tons of paper. The factory of Saida
has a capacity of 40,000 tons of cardboard boxes. The
factory of Souk-Ahras produces 10,000 tons of paper per
year. During 1974, Algeria's capacity for producing paper
jumped from 50,000 tons to 150,000 tons as the three units
of Mostaganem, Saida, and Souk-Ahras were put into opera
tion. However, although the situation of paper production
has been improved after the establishment of new factor
ies, Algeria still cannot export and must always import
paper in order to cover its national needs, especially in
cardboard boxes and pulp.
Alfa in Algeria is very limited. Its transformation
into paper and its transportation is still expensive which
has made the state companies depend more on imported
paper. In 1976, the state company SONIC assumed control
over all paper industry. It manages pulp production, the
making of printed paper and packing cases, and the major
ity of paper transformation. In 1978, SONIC signed a $55
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 1 5
million contract for another paper mill at Mostaganem with
the United States firm of Parsons and Whittemore. An
Italian firm, Poligrafico Bultoni, won a $47 million
contract with SONIC to built a factory for paper bags and
cardboard boxes with a capacity of 25,000 tons per year.
A Swiss firm, Bobst, has also signed a $6.1 million con
tract to supply machinery for a SONIC plant at Bordj-Bou
Arriridj. Table 51 presents the production of paper and
boxes.
TABLE 51
PRODUCTION OF PAPER AND BOXES (Millions of tons)
Paper & Packing Packing Articles
Printed Year Boxes Paper Paper Boxes
1972 16.6 21.1 12.5 7.4 1974 18.1 17.5 11.7 10.4 1976 35.6 26.4 12.9 9.6 1978 34.0 23.9 ------1979 36.5 27.5 ------
SOURCE : Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 134.
Algeria's forest land provides little wood for local
industry. The major part of wood that is being used to
manufacture furniture, doors, and windows is imported.
Most of these articles tend to be made of metal because
the price of wood is very high. In general, the private
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 216
sector maintained a good place in the production of furni
ture. Two national companies are specialized in the wood
industry: SNLB (Societe Nationale des Industries du Liege
et des Bois) and SONACOB (Societe Nationale de Commercial
isation des Bois et Derives) . In 1970, the latter company
began to import and commercialize wood and its deriva
tives. The direct purchase of wood or already built
furniture from abroad is restricted. A factory for plas
tic furniture is planned. Table 52 shows the production
of wood and paper products.
TABLE 52
OUTPUT OF WOOD AND PAPER PRODUCTS, 1973-1977 (Thousands of metric tons)
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
Furniture 172 205 _ _ » mm mm — w _ Packing cases3 7,341 4,600 ------Wooden boards 14 75 ------Paper 29 31 35 56 90
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 105.
a. In thousands of units.
According to this table, packing case production has
dropped dramatically since 1974, while paper production
has risen. The reason is the greater profitability of
paper operations and the concentration of capital in this
area.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 1 7
Leather and Shoe Industries
Before independence, the leather industry had little
significance. There was only one tannery in existence in
El-Amria (near Oran) producing 2,500 tons of leather. The
local demand was very low, because there were no important
shoe industries. Even the production of El-Amria used to
be exported to France.
After independence, both leather and shoe industries
witnessed a considerable development. In 1966, the state
company, SNTAL (Societe Nationale des Tanneries Algeri-
ennes) opened the first tannery at Rouiba (near Algiers)
with a capacity of production of 25,000 tons of leather
and employing 264 workers. Within the framework of the
third-year plan (1967-1969), another tannery was built in
Jijel in 1967, with a capacity of 8,000 tons of leather.
Other shoe factories began production in Setif (1967),
Tebessa (1967), Sidi-Bel Abbas (1967), and Dellys, antici
pated to produce 8 million pairs of shoes by 1969 and 19
million pairs by 1973. These factories were regrouped
under the state company SONIPEC (Societe Nationale des
Industries de Peaux et des Cuirs) in 1972.
In 1969, the state company SNTAL, with 1,396 employ
ees and 13 micro-enterprises, was the dominant company in
this industry. This was due to the four-year plan (1970-
1973) which had among its objectives the extension of the
two former tanneries, Rouiba and Jijel, the creation of
new ones at Batna (treating 200 tons of leather per year)
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 1 8
and another at Tizi-Ouzou (treating 2,000 tons of leather,
mixed leather and rubber). At the level of finished
products, a factory was established in Algiers to provide
leather cloth and suitcases. We can say that since 1969,
Algeria has imported no leather for the manufacture of
shoes. It obtains all of its needs from the two major
tanneries at Rouiba and Jijel. Table 53 shows the general
increase of leather products.
TABLE 53
OUTPUT OF LEATHER PRODUCTS, 1973-1977
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
Shoes3 . 633 1,120 1,230 1,319 1,775 Goat & Sheep skins 6.5 11 11 14 17 Leather covering0 392 672 644 753 773 Shoe soles 12,012 14,718 14,484 15,540 22,530
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria, (New York: Chase World Information, 1978), p. 104.
a. In thousands of pairs.
b. In millions of square feet.
c. In tons.
Before independence, as we have already seen, the
shoe industry did not exist in the full meaning of the
word. However, since independence it has known a remark
able growth. During the first years, this industry was
largely dominated by the private sector, which consisted
of 117 enterprises employing 4,572 workers. These units
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 1 9
of production were concentrated around Algiers (50%) ,
Oran, and Constantine. At present, the private sector is
still active in the retail business of the industry
through Bata, which is authorized to distribute and sell
the products to the private sector on behalf of the state
company, SONIPEC. In 1978, the Algerian general company
for shoes in Bordj El-Kiffan (near Algiers) and the CAFIC
(Compagnie Algerienne des Fabrications Industrielles de la
Chaussure) in El-Harrach (Algiers) started their activi
ties in shoe manufacturing. In that year, SONIPEC operat
ed 12 factories. At the end of 1976, a contract was
signed with a French consortium to build a factory at
Akbou (West Bejaia) employing 800 workers, and turning out
2,225,000 pairs of shoes by 1978. Algeria is now self-
sufficient in shoes, but the quality is still average for
men's shoes and below average for women's shoes. Table 54
shows Algerian shoe production.
TABLE 54
SHOE PRODUCTION (Thousands of pairs)
Year Leather Textile Other Internal
1970 5,428 900 10,302 210 1972 5,087 1,052 9,336 424 1974 6,060 880 13,183 134 1976 6,859 1,068 11,251 234
SOURCE: Jacques Schnetzler, Le developpement alqerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), p. 131.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 220
Conclusion
Light industry is the sector in which the control
over imported equipment and finished products is the
strictest. To measure the foreign dependency of light
industry, we will consider the following branches: tex
tiles, chemistry, leather, and agro-alimentary industries.
In the textile branch, the coefficient of foreign depen
dency is 6.6 percent, which proves that the substitution
for imports has achieved a high level in this branch of
industry, although Algeria still imports cotton and some
finished textile products. In the branch of chemicals,
the coefficient of dependency has remained high at 60.1
percent. In the branch of leather and shoes, the substi
tution of imports is very advanced and the coefficient of
imports is no more than 2.7 percent. Finally, in the
field of agro-alimentary industries, the coefficient of
foreign dependency remained somewhat high at 26.2
percent (see Graph 3).*
The dissimilarity in degree of foreign dependency
among the different branches of industry can be explained
by two factors: the lack of local input and the complex
ity of technology that is needed to put the industry into
operation. For example, substitution of imports in the
1 ' / M.E. Bemssad, Economie du developpement de 1 'Algerie, 1979, p. 141.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 221
pharmaceutical industry (chemistry branch) is more diffi
cult, because of a lack of input (raw material) and know
how, than in of the shoe industries (leather branch) ,
where the input (leather) is available and know-how is
easy to obtain. Another factor that also determines the
trend of substitution is that state policy is more strict
with regard to imports in the light industry sector.
Finally, it is necessary to point out that since
1980, policy has been shifting in favor of light industry.
An immediate effect of the new policy was reflected in the
annual development budget allocation for the financial
year 1980. The allocation for heavy industry was cut back
to DA 7.8 billion, whereas light industry, which is
regarded as having a great impact on consumer demands, was
given an increased allocation of DA 8 billion as compared 2 to DA 6.8 billion in 1979. Therefore, the recent
achievement of light industry is due to the fact that this
sector is more integrated with the national agricultural
sector, from which it receives around 41 percent of its
input, and because of the increased attention devoted to
light industry during the period of the first five-year
plan (1980-84) .
1 ' > M.E. Benissad, Economre du developpement de 1'Algerie, 1979, p. 141.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER V III
INDUSTRIALIZATION AND AGRICULTURE IN LIGHT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Introduction
In this chapter we will explain the issue of agricul
ture and industrialization in light of development plans.
These include the three-year plan, 1967-1969; the first
and second four-year plans, 1970-1973 and 1974-1977,
respectively; and finally the first five-year plan, 1980-
1984. We will also explain how the priority that has been
given to industrialization at the expense of agriculture
has resulted in uneven economic development.
During the colonial period, agriculture was the basic
economic activity for the largest segment of the Algerian
population. French policy was designed to enlarge the
amount of public land for distribution to French settlers.
At independence in 1962, Europeans owned about 22,000
farms totalling about 2.2 million hectares of cropland and
400,000 hectares of unproductive forest land. Algerian
farm owners numbered 631,000 and held 4.7 million hectares
of cropland plus 6.3 million hectares of forest and unpro
ductive land. The European owners, managers, and techni
cal staffs of most of the farms fled Algeria immediately
after independence and abandoned about half the farmland
222
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 2 3
in 1962. All remaining European land was nationalized in
two stages in April and May 1963. The workers seized
control of the farms in order to carry out the production
routines. The outcome was the famous autogestion or
self-management process, which was further developed in
1963. The rapid speed of autogestion not only served to
protect the country's agriculture from severe damage, but
also provided the government with a new socialization
program for the agricultural sector (see Chapter IV for
the organizational structure of the autogestion coopera
tives) .
However, since 1966, the government has modified its
original position of turning ownership of the farms over
to the workers. Since then, the right to the use of the
land remained with the workers, acting through their
cooperatives, but ownership resided in the hands of gov
ernment. Gradually the government established effective
control of the self-managed farms. The number of social
ized farms was progressively reduced to accommodate the
scarcity of management and technical expertise. It was
estimated that
[in] 1978, the socialized farms totaled an estimated 2.4 to 2.5 million hectares and employed around 160 thousand permanent workers and about 90 thousand to 100 thousand seasonal workers. It was estimated that these farms supported about 20% of the agricultural labor force.
The effort of the government that assumed power in
1965 was concentrated on establishing a new modern
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 2 4
agricultural sector because of its foreign exchange-
earning capabilities. To achieve this objective, the new
government tried to provide adequate services, marketing
credit, and foreign trade facilities for the modern sec
tor. The 1967-69 and 1970-73 development plans have
served to organize investment available for the agricul
tural sector in a more rational way. The goals of the new
regime for agriculture were to:
1. Increase production and incomes in the agri
cultural sector
2. Provide food at affordable prices to low income
groups
3. Establish wages which provide a sufficient incen
tive for farmers to produce
4. Improve farm productivity and hence output by
subsidizing key inputs such as fertilizers
5. Develop the marketing system
6. Distribute credit for investment and farm inputs
to farms according to a government development plan
7. Establish prices of inputs and of agricultural
commodities
8. Define investment and programs for agricultural
marketing, inputs supply, and processing enterprises
^Harold D. Nelson, ed., Algeria: A Country Study, (Washington D.C., Government Printing Office, 1979), p. 168.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 2 5
To meet these goals, the government launched an
agrarian revolution for the traditional sector in 1972.
The traditional sector was essentially the indigenous
agricultural community, where cultivation was carried out
under inadequate conditions in terms of cultivation
methods and production inputs.
The charter of the agrarian revolution was not only a
land distribution document; it was also a political and
economic one. It stood for improving the economic and
social welfare of the rural population. Among its long-
range goals were the reduction of rural unemployment, an
increase in the production of foodstuffs, and the exten
sion of the domestic consumer market for domestic manu
factured goods.
During the period 1972-1973, the first phase of the
agrarian revolution, 3 million hectares of state-owned
land, communal land, and habus (religious) land were made
available for redistribution, although only about one-
fourth was redistributed.
The second phase of the agrarian revolution, which
lasted from 1973 to 1975, dealt with the large private
farms owned by Algerians. This land, which had passed out
of the hands of the former European owners to Algerians
who were absentee owners, was to be nationalized. During
this period, the Algerian government began to expropriate
land from farms having more than 50 hectares. The expro
priated land, combined with traditionally collective land
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 226
that was distributed, totaled about 1.6 million hectares
by 1980. Beneficiaries were grouped into about 6,800 new
production cooperatives. About 50 percent of Algeria's
land is farmed by production cooperatives and self-managed
farms created from colonists' holdings.
The third phase dealt with livestock reform. All
pasture land was nationalized and the Nomads were to be
resettled in new villages. According to the Charter, one
thousand new villages were to be created across the coun
try, where the soil could be cultivated by irrigation. By
1978, several hundreds were built. Another aspect of the
agrarian revolution was the establishment of cooperatives
(either for production or marketing). Most of the redis
tribution land went to landless peasants who joined coop
eratives. Most cooperatives were of small and medium
size, having only a few members and a guaranteed yearly
income from the state, regardless of the profitability of
the cooperative.
As early as 1978, most observers noted that the
agrarian revolution in Algeria was limited to a quantita
tive change, without paying attention to the social end
economic changes that have occurred. Although the reform
was not as extensive as the government had hoped, some
change had taken place. Perhaps the major changes have
been the abolition of the Khammas (sharecropper) system,
absentee landlords, and religious and tribal land.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 2 7
The most important structural change in the agricul
tural sector during the past twenty years has been in
government intervention. Public agricultural marketing
enterprises were created and given an official monopoly.
Prices were fixed by the government from the wholesale to
the retail level, banking was nationalized, and agricul
tural credit was provided through one of the banks accord
ing to government directions.
Crop production has varied widely from year to year,
depending on annual rainfall. In the late 1950s and early
1960s, crop production was severely disrupted as a result
of the dislocations of the war for independence. The
decline in the areas planted with vines reflected the end
of the French market for Algerian wines. During the
French colonial period, grapes were the chief crop? but
since 1967 the export market for wine has declined, and
many vineyards have been converted to grain production and
citrus. Still, Algeria was the fifth largest producer of
wine in the world as late as 1976. About 90 percent of
the wine produced was exported.
Before the colonial period, olives dominated Algerian
agriculture. After the French arrived, thousands of
hectares of olive trees were uprooted, and the land was
transformed into vineyards. After independence the new
Algerian government tried to revitalize the olive indus
try, but progress in increasing olive production is slow.
The best quality of olive oil is being exported.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 2 8
In terms of cultivated land and orchards, the most
important crops are wheat, barley, grapes, olives, citrus,
fruit, potatoes and other tree crops. Together these
represent about 95 percent of the cropland in actual use,
of which almost 80 percent is devoted to the production of
cereals. The area under cereal cultivation almost doubled
between 1974 and 1976, when it reached about 4 million
hectares. Harvests were poor in 1974 and 1975, necessi
tating annual imports of over one million metric tons of
grains. 1976 was an exception because favorable weather
provided a yield of 2.9 million metric tons. Although the
amount of land for grain production in 1977 was even
greater than in 1976, yields were only about 40 percent of
the 1976 level because of severe drought.
In the south, about half of the labor force is en
gaged in date production. Algeria is the leading producer
of the kind of date most in demand on the international
market, and date production represented in 1979 about 2
percent of the country's total agricultural production.
Objectives assigned by the government to the agricul
tural sector include the pursuit of food self-sufficiency
to reduce dependence on food imports, increased rural
incomes, greater food availability, employment generation,
foreign exchange, and economic growth. In order to
achieve these goals, greater government control over
resource use in agriculture is seen as necessary. Fifty
percent of the land is farmed by the public sector.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 2 9
Government control is believed necessary in Algeria not
only to efficiently manage the economy, but to achieve
social objectives and economic independence.
However, according to these objectives, Algerian
agriculture has done less well. Despite all these ef
forts, the role of agriculture is declining as other
sectors, such as the hydrocarbons and industrial sectors,
grow more rapidly. The overall value of agricultural
output was estimated to have declined 10 percent between
the late 1950s and the late 1960s. The decline in output,
combined with a rapid increase in population, suggests a
significant downward trend in the per capita income of the
agricultural sector. Agriculture's share in GDP declined
from 21 percent in 1960 to 7 percent in 1979. Agricul
tural growth contributed only by 4.55 percent to Algeria's
total growth of GDP. During the ten year-period 1960-70,
agricultural growth continued to be slow. According to
the World Bank, Algeria from 1969-70 through 1978-80 had
among the slowest-growing agricultural sectors of middle
income countries. However, general rapid growth in
Algeria's GDP has been primarily the result of increased
income from oil and gas, and to a lesser extent rapid
growth in services and industry.
The low agricultural growth must be viewed in the
context of the natural constraints, human resources,
government policy, and the need to transform a colonial
agricultural structure inherited at independence.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 0
Land and Climatic Constraints
The primary constraint is the low level of rainfall.
The more intensive use of farm inputs in a low rainfall
year could cause considerable revenue loss. This is
certainly one of the major factors inhibiting many farm
ers, particularly small farmers, from introducing new
forms of technology. A second major constraint is the
scarcity of agricultural land relative to the rural popu
lation (7 hectares of cultivable land per rural person).
Most of the land is used for the cultivation of barley and
wheat.
Human Resources
The development of human resources is associated with
education. Greater education leads to a greater ability
to understand and apply new agricultural knowledge and
technology. In other words, the lack of skilled workers
and competent cadres has contributed to the decline of
agricultural sector output. This is why government spend
ing on education increased in the five-year plan
(1980-84).
Government Policy
Due to the government policy of economic development,
the largest part of investment is devoted to industry; the
budget allocated to agriculture is maintained extremely
low. This explains in part the poor operation and mainte
nance of the agricultural sector. Management and other
institutional constraints have also hindered the ability
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 1
of Algerian production cooperatives. This is due to the
bureaucratic nature of the administration.
Other factors contribute to the declining trend of
agriculture, such as the massive withdrawal of European
capital, management, and skilled labor after independence.
The breakdown of the French markets for Algerian exports,
especially that for wines, was also a decisive factor.
Primitive farming methods characterizes the small tradi
tional farms; modern methods are generally followed on the
farms formerly owned by Europeans and now run by the
public sector. An estimated 20,000 to 25,000 private
medium-sized farms still practice the traditional methods
on a large scale. Many young farmers have left the land
for the cities. Many workers, who now receive a guaran
teed monthly wage, simply do not have the incentive to
produce, and there is a lack of coordination of needed
inputs. For example, seeds, fertilizers, and spare parts
for machinery must be ordered from a central source, and
frequently the needed items do not arrive at the farm on
time. These are among the most important explanations for
the low agricultural growth in Algeria.
Average wheat yields in Algeria have not increased
(as a matter of fact, they declined at 1 percent per year
from 1970 to 1979) . The share of fruit tree investment in
total agricultural investment has declined considerably.
Yields for other crops have stagnated for the same rea
sons. The benefit of technology has been questioned.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 2
because it has caused the replacement of labor. There
fore, Algerian dependency on agricultural imports has
increased greatly during the 1960s and 1970s. Continua
tion of present trends would make Algeria increasingly
dependent on imports. In this sense, Algeria's pursuit of
economic independency and self-sufficiency has not yet
been achieved. With this poor performance comes low
income in agriculture, increasing rural-urban inequality,
and rapid migration off the land.
Algeria's poor agricultural performance has resulted
in less satisfaction of its population's food needs.
Increased Algerian demand for food, caused by rapidly
rising population growth, was largely satisfied by im
ports. According to the World Bank, for example, during
1976-79 the annual percentage growth of consumption in
vegetables was 8.1 percent, sugar 7.0 percent, meat 7.2
percent, and cereals 4.0 percent, whereas the annual
percentage growth of production was only 6.8 percent in
vegetables, -9.2 percent in sugar, 6.1 percent in meat,
and -2.2 percent in cereals. The annual percentage growth
of imports was 4.8, 7.4, 3.9, and 14 percent, respective-
i 2 i y .
It is only very recently, with the five-year plan,
that investment in agriculture is devoted on a large-scale
2 World Bank, The Agricultural Development Experience of Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia (Washington D.C., World Bank, 1982), p. 14.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 3
to irrigation, infrastructure, mechanization, and other
public projects. Table 55 shows the shifting structure of
agricultural investment.
TABLE 55
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT
1970-73 1980-84
Irrigation 26.6 45.3 Extension, research training 2.4 11.6 Livestock 10.9 7.0 Fruit trees 13.2 3.8 Forestry,soil construction 9.8 7.6 Machinery 18.9 7.0 Rural infrastructure 15.1 15.7 Fisheries 3.1 2.0 Total 100.0 100.0
SOURCE: World Bank, The Agricultural Development Ex- perience of Algeria, Morocco , and Tunisia (Washington DC., 1982), p. 20.
According to the five-year plan, 75 percent of the
agricultural investment was devoted to livestock. Live
stock includes mainly cattle and poultry. Animal health
services, shelters, and better feed are necessary to
maintain this stock. Growth in poultry production was 9.5
percent per year in 1967-79. However, satisfaction of the
national needs has not been reached. Constraints to
higher yields include (1) inadequate feed quality and
quantity, (2) frequent lack of water, and (3) poor shel
ters and inadequate health facilities.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 4
Agricultural growth can be expected to occur not only
as a result of the introduction of new farm technologies,
but also of investment in rural infrastructure. Modern
input and knowledge can reach the farmer when there is a
road network. Investment in rural infrastructure should
operate to:
1. Facilitate the transmission of knowledge to
farmers
2. Facilitate farmers' acquisition of inputs
3. Facilitate the continuous sale of products to
buyers
Algeria, by the end of 1970, was transformed from an
agricultural country to one with a growing industrial
economy. The government after 1965 was determined to
carry out a long-range industrialization development plans
projected into the 1980s.
The fundamental economic objectives of the Boumediene
government have been the the establishment of heavy indus
try and the expansion of production. This would lead to a
stage of self-sufficiency by the 1980s, the achievement of
economic independence, the improvement of income distribu
tion, employment generation, and the training of skilled
workers. To meet these fundamental objectives, the gov
ernment adopted a long-range development aimed at rapid
industrialization, based on hydrocarbons and heavy indus
try.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 5
From the start of independence, the authorities
considered industrialization the best means for solving
the major structural problems of the economy. During the
first years of independence, industrial policy was in
favor of light industry for two reasons: to reduce import
materials and to create comparatively labor-intensive
development. With the change of government in 1965 and
the rapid growth of hydrocarbons output, export, and
prices, the authorities shifted to a policy of heavy
industry and industrialization based on hydrocarbons.
This policy aimed at achieving effective self-
sufficiency that called for a high level of technological
competence. The key was the hydrocarbons sector, which
would provide financing and basic raw materials. Financed
by exports of petroleum and natural gas, the iron ores
would provide the raw material for the steel industry.
The steel industry would provide the metal needed for the
pipelines that would feed the hydrocarbons from the Sahara
fields to the expanded transformation and export facili
ties on the coast. It would also supply the necessary
railroad, auto, truck, and tractor plants, petrochemical
complexes, shipbuilding, and machine tool industries.
Algeria has pursued a mineral and industry growth
strategy in which government participation is dominant.
The government has been radical in this strategy, allocat
ing the greatest percentage of its investment and human
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 6
resources to the mining (mostly petroleum) and industrial
sectors.
Planned economic development in Algeria started with
the three-year plan (1967-1969) , which represented the
first phase of a long-range development program running
into the 1980s. The three-year plan was followed by the
first four-year plan (1970-1973) and the second four-year
plan (1974-1977). The years 1978 and 1979 were used as a
transitional period before launching the next five-year
plan (1980-1984).
The actual planning machinery was detached from the
Ministry of Finance and placed under a Secretary of State
for Planning. A plan was designed in terms of the physi
cal outputs on the basis of production presented by the
technical ministries. The analysis and screening of the
results was usually arrived at by the Planning Secretariat
and the Ministry of Finance, involving also the approval
of the Central Bank of Algeria (Banque Centrale
d'Algerie), the Algerian Development Bank (Banque Algeri-
enne de Developpement), and the commercial bank charged
with the responsibility for the economic sector in which a
given project fell.
Each plan laid the groundwork for another, and at the
end of each year the Council of the Revolution and the
Council of Ministers in a joint session reviewed the
objectives of the development plan and assessed the prog
ress achieved during the year and the adjustments that
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 7
should be made. For example, investment in the years 1974
and 1975 were made on the basis of the original plan,
which had anticipated high oil prices. Total investment
was over 110 billion DA. When oil revenue declined in
1975 from the expected level because of a combination of
energy-saving measures in western countries and the need
to import more food, a number of projects for 1976 were
postponed, and the government was forced to rely more than
it had anticipated on foreign borrowing to maintain its
revised investment goals.
The three-year plan (1967-1969) envisaged investment
of around DA 12 billion, of which about 82 percent was
utilized. The first four-year plan (1970-1973) was more
ambitious, and more money was invested than the originally
proposed DA 27 billion. Although some goals of this plan
were not achieved, the growth rate of the gross domestic
product (GDP) averaged more than 11 percent annually.
Between 300,000 and 320,000 new jobs were created in that
period. The second four-year plan (1974-1977) continued
to give top priority to industrialization. The first
five-year plan (1980-1984) also continued to give priority
to industrialization but with more attention to infras
tructure, agriculture and social needs such as housing,
water, electricity, health, and education.
Although these plans form the core of Algerian devel
opment, a number of special regional programs have been
organized outside the framework of the plans to provide
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 8
more economic and social aid, notably for employment and
education in low income areas. For example, the special
programs for the Aures and the Grande Kabylie regions.
During the 1974-1977 development plan a series of small
industrial projects operated by the wilayas (provinces)
were begun as part of the new regional industrial develop
ment program.
To equalize regional incomes, the government has
maintained a policy of locating many of the new industries
in the poorest Wilayas. For example, more than two-thirds
of the 900 new industrial projects originally proposed for
the 1974-1977 period were to be located outside major
urban areas. Despite the government's goal of diversify
ing the geographic location of industry, most industry is
still concentrated on the coast near Algiers, Oran,
Annaba, and Constantine. Many of the older plants have
been expanded or modernized. The coast zone continues to
be the country's principal industrial center (see Appendix
B) .
The First Three-Year Plan (1967-1969)
The three-year plan constituted in general an attempt
to restructure post-colonial Algeria's economic situation.
It was planned to deal with the following main issues:
1. The correction of uneven colonial development and
its failure to develop the productive forces
2. Presenting a new policy of development
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 3 9
3. Reorganizing the social, economic and political
apparatuses
4. Implementing a rapid capital-intensive indus
trialization
5. Enhancing state control
The substance of the three-year plan was, therefore,
to overcome the underdevelopment of the productive forces,
to reduce the disequilibrium between the economic sectors
created by French colonialism, to accelerate development
based on industrialization, and to integrate the different
branches of economic production.
Few details have been released concerning this plan.
A total of DA 12 billion was scheduled for investment over
the three-year period, and DA 9,124 million were actually
invested. Already industry took the lion's share with DA
5,400 million, while agriculture was given only DA 1,900
million. This led to inequality between the two sectors.
By branches, the allocations were as follows: hydro
carbons DA 2,307 million, metallurgy DA 975 million, and
chemicals DA 463 million. These three industrial branches
absorbed about 80 percent of industrial investment during
this plan.
During the Ben Bella regime, the policy of economic
development was in favor of light industry, and to some
extent, the development of the agriculture sector. The
new regime believed that the development of agriculture
could not be achieved without the development of heavy
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 0
industry, which would bring about an independent national
development. Thus, within the framework of the three-year
plan, industrial investment was emphasized while the
agricultural sector was neglected.
The first goal of this plan was to generate some
resources of hard currency. Therefore, the plan mobilized
the export sectors (hydrocarbons; mining and some agro-
alimentary industrial branches; dates, citrus, and other
fruit). The second goal was to integrate productive
sectors and the different industrial branches such as
metallurgy and the mechanical and electric industries.
Foreign credit contributed to the financing of the
industrial program of the three-year plan with 25 percent
of the total capital used. In 1969, following the 29 July
1965 accord, French capital dominated most of the projects
that were announced by the Algerian government: seven
contracts in 1967, 10 contracts in 1968, and 15 contracts
4 in 1969. The majority of the projects were undertaken by
French companies and financed by the OCI (Office de
Cooperation Industrielle). From 1966 to 1969, the OCI
spent FF 1,643 million, of which FF 155 million was in the
form of aid, FF 642 million was in long-term government
loans, and FF 845 million from private credit.
Sixty-eight percent of these credits went to the hydrocar
bons sector. Each project offered an opportunity to
French companies to sell their equipment and to install
their technology and, finally, to train Algerian
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 1
personnel, which meant adopting the technical, economic,
and social norms of French capitalism.
In general, the three-year plan did not change the
pre-plan economic situation very much. Its effort was
mainly devoted to the organization of administration,
public enterprises, and enlarged state control. Also,
this plan led to the consolidation and the domination of a
new social class of bureaucrats over the country's affairs
and the expansion of its economic base, reinforcing its
political power.
Although the three-year plan marked some social and
political achievement (i.e. enhancing state control and
establishing a public enterprise base), it did not achieve
its economic objectives. The delay in the realization of
public economic projects, the marginality of agricultural
production, and the growth of local demands with the
shortage of alimentary goods led to a serious disequilib
rium of the national economy and thus toward uneven devel
opment. According to the planners of the first four-year
plan (1970-73), the large projects that were not achieved
by the three-year plan were as follows:
1. The unit of gas liquefaction at Skikda
2. All the projects of SONAREM, some of which had
been planned since 1965
3. The thermic power station of Annaba
4. The metallurgical complex of El-Hadjar
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 2
5. All main mechanic and electric construction
projects and, in particular, the two tractor and agricul
tural machines complexes
6. All the light chemical projects, in particular
the pharmaceutical product plants
7. The cement projects, which were delayed by two
years
The First Four-Year Plan (1970-1973)
With the implementation of the first four-year plan,
there was no major change in development policy. The
emphasis on heavy industry and capital-intensive indus
trialization continued along the same lines. Concentra
tion on the hydrocaj.oons sector, construction of national
economic enterprises, and centralization of credit and
decision making in the hands of government were all
enhanced.
The first four-year plan constituted the fundamental
law governing all economic and social activity of the
country during the period 1970-73. It embodied a strategy
for development that was based on hydrocarbons and indus
try.
Planners of this plan (1970-73) distinguished between
two types of investment: non-productive, such as social
services and research, and productive investment, such as
industry and agriculture. The productive investment
represented 49 percent of the total and was concentrated
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 3
in the sectors that were directly profit-earning. The
foreign involvement in financing the first four-year plan
was 50 percent of the total investment. We can therefore
say that financing the investment of this four-year plan
was achieved by foreign capital as a main source.
The growth of the hydrocarbons sector continued.
Some progress in construction, public works and services
(transport services and trade) was achieved. The margin-
ality of agriculture and traditional mining activities was
obviously maintained.
During the period covered by the this plan, the
average annual GDP growth rate was fixed at 9 percent. At
an annual growth rate of 9 percent, the Algerian GDP was
scheduled to rise from DA 14,640 billion in 1969 to DA
21,083 billion in 1973. An International Monetary Fund
report asserted that in the period 1969-70, GDP in fact
grew by 10.6 percent per annum. Prices rose by perhaps
2.5 percent annually during the same period so that real
growth should be estimated at 8 percent per annum.
Agriculture was consistently under-represented. Only
15 percent of total investment in the first plan was
allocated for agriculture, while 45 percent was devoted to
industry (see Table 63). This imbalance is at the heart
of the Algerian policy of development: the country must
industrialize in order to develop agriculture. In other
words, industrialization is a pre-condition for agricul
tural development. However, it seemed a hopeless task to
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 4
change one factor without changing most other components.
For example, introducing modern technology and chemical
fertilizers alone is not enough. Efforts were needed for
regrouping fragmented land, establishing land banks,
intensifying irrigation and creating service cooperatives
to provide farm machinery, seeds and extension services.
Agricultural development is not only a matter of convinc
ing peasants to use new technology and chemical fertiliz
ers, but involves a complete transformation of the infra
structure .
In reference to the figures of the first plan, agri
cultural investments looked like this: total investments
within the framework of the plan reached DA 27,740 million
($1=4.4 DA) or about $6.3 billion. Of this total, only DA
4,140 million were invested in agriculture, that is, 15
percent of the total investment (see Table 57).
The gross agricultural product was anticipated to
grow by only 3 percent per annum, which would mean that,
with a population growth rate of 3.3 percent, per capita
income in the agricultural sector would remain unchanged.
Could the agricultural sector thus perform its crucial
role as a market for industrial production? The answer is
negative because the amount of production that agriculture
provided was not sufficient to create significant exchang
es between agriculture and industry. Also, because most
of the new development programs were confined to the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 5
modern sector or public sector, Algeria's agricultural
dualism was simply reinforced.
TABLE 56
INVESTMENT BY SECTOR AND YEAR, 1970-1973 (Millions of DA)
Total Sector 1970 1971 1972 1973 1970/73 (percent)
Industry 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 12,400 45 Agriculture 720 910 1,100 1,400 4,140 15 Infrastructure 494 500 600 713 2,307 8 Education 650 665 682 721 2,720 10 Training 135 160 160 132 587 2 Housing 238 368 438 476 1,520 5 Transport 368 208 131 93 800 3 Tourism 165 170 180 185 700 2.5 Social 190 213 243 288 934 3.5 Ccmnunity equipment 165 175 195 225 762 3.0 Administrative equipment 210 210 220 230 870 3.0 Total 6,435 6,679 7,059 7,563 27,740 100
SOURCE: John Waterburg, Land, Man, and Development in Algeria: the Four-Year Plan. American Universities Field Staff, Vol. XVII, No. 3, 1973, p. 5.
Advocates of the present policy might accept the
above argument and still defend the validity of current
investment proportions. For some, the imbalance was due
to the lack of capital; for others, it was due to the lack
of skilled personnel, which in itself would require a
higher level of investments. The Ministry of Agriculture
did not play a dynamic role in this respect, as it did not
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 6
devote enough money to research, training, or agent exten
sion .
With regard to industry, the first four-year plan
called for an investment in industry of DA 12.4 billion or
45 percent of total plan investments. Of the DA 12.4
billion, 36 percent went directly to hydrocarbons, and a
third of that to research and exploration. The other
largest industries were those of steel (15%) and elec
trical and mechanical equipment (11%). It is clear that
the first four-year plan aimed at establishing what De
Bernis called "industrializing industries," that is,
establishing a heavy industry that would be capable of
feeding basic industries. The raw materials available in
Algeria for this effort were principally oil, natural gas,
iron ore, phosphates, and zinc combined. These were to
supply the two wings of the industrial sector: the steel
industry and the hydrocarbons industry.
Algerian planners wanted the Algerian steel industry
to have access to foreign markets, once it reached full
production, on the assumption that Algeria would break its
neo-colonial dependency on the developed world. For this
reason, Algeria used capital-intensive projects, employing
tne most advanced technology. It was argued that this
strategy would keep per unit costs down, and with low
labor costs, Algerian products would be competitive in
world markets. The price paid for this choice was, of
course, dependency upon foreign capital and technology and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 7
the maintenance of a high level of unemployment. Presi
dent Boumediene stated his position with respect to
capital-intensive industrialization as follows: "I accept
the pressure of a certain amount of underemployment,
because it is temporary, but I will never accept under- 3 equipment of my country for that would be definitive."
In examining the resources of financing the first
four-year plan, one has to come back to hydrocarbons. Oil
accounted for 70 percent of all Algeria's exports and 50
percent of all hard currency earnings. It was estimated
that in 1972, oil earnings reached DA 3.2 billion or 41
percent of the total fiscal income of the Algerian govern
ment. Oil production in 1972 was to reach 54 million
tons, but in fact reached only 52 million tons, as we have
seen in Chapter V. Throughout the period of the first
plan, around 35 percent of total Algerian investment was
financed by oil earnings. However, GDP grew only by 4
percent. The following factors determined the financing
and execution of the first four-year plan: first,
maintaining and finding foreign markets for raw materials
and processed goods; second, achieving targeted production
within Algerian enterprises; third, maintaining a steady
flow of foreign credit, which was dependent on the first
two factors.
3 • H. Boumediene, Discours du president Boumediene (Alger: SNED, Vol. VIII, 1979), p. 77.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 8
According to Algerian planners, at least 60 percent
of all plan goals were achieved on time. If we accept
this as success, part of it was due to the large funds
spent on it. There was a tendency to assume that progress
in completing projects varied directly with the proportion
of allocated funds spent on them.
The first plan could be seen as successful according
to its own criteria of building an industrial sector, but
it could not be successful in terms of selling its prod
ucts to the agricultural sector, because the agricultural
sector was not developed to the extent that it could form
a market or outlet for industrial products. It could not
be considered successful in terms of achieving an inte
grated independent economic development. The neglect of
agriculture and infrastructure reinforced the imbalance.
The Second Four-Year Plan (1974-1977)
The general objectives of the second four-year plan
(1974-77) were to reinforce the economic independence of
the country, to build up the state enterprises, to in
crease production, and to construct a productive base of
industrialization in order to meet demographic growth
needs. To achieve these goals, the government tried to
mobilize all material and human means. The major princi
ples of the plan were as follows:
1. Medicine for all
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 4 9
2. The satisfaction of essential needs: employment
and housing
3. The increase of production
4. Creating maximum employment
The increase of production was the dominant factor in
the second four-year plan. The plan emphasized an indus
try of transformation which could play an important role
for the integration of the national economy. Although
investment in agriculture was slightly raised in the
second four-year plan, the strategic choices remained
unchanged.
TABLE 57
DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL CONSUMPTION ACCORDING TO RURAL AND URBAN AREAS
1973 1977
Units Rural Urban National Rural Urban National
Cereals 10 Q 12.22 12.18 24.4 15.65 14.3 29.95 Vegetables 10 T 150.0 365.0 515.0 233.0 582.0 815.0 Fruits 10 T 211.0 509.0 720.0 330.0 820.0 1,150.0 Meat 10 T 57.5 122.5 180.0 83.0 205.0 288.0 Milk 10 L 180.0 720.0 900.0 270.0 1,200.0 1,470.0 Fatty matter 10 T 37.6 87.7 125.3 52.0 126.0 178.0 Sugar 10 T 109.0 145.0 254.0 151.0 178.0 329.0 Textiles 10 T 14.25 33.25 47.5 25.2 46.6 71.8
SOURCE: Secretariat D'Etat au Plan , II Plan Quadriennal 1974-77 (Alger: Imprimerie Officielle, 1974), p. 84.
Since the first four-year plan, the establishment of
national industry has become more visible and concrete.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 0
During the second four-year plan, as another step in
realizing the global strategy of development, more empha
sis was placed on industrialization as being the essential
base for constructing an independent national economy,
achieving integration of industrial activities, enlarging
production, and creating employment. This second four-
year plan also differed in terms of the great diversity of
objectives to be achieved. Accordingly, the second four-
year plan launched a great number of projects that would
furnish the necessary equipment and tools for the differ
ent economic activities. It directed its efforts mainly
to the mechanical and electric industries, the chemical
industries, and the preliminary transformation of metal
industries. It also continued to establish the metallur
gical complexes (e.g., El-Hadjar) , as well as the hydro
carbons and petrochemical industries. In general, the
second four-year plan concentrated upon the satisfaction
of local needs and was to constitute a new important step
in the process of industrialization. A great part of the
satisfaction of the national needs was achieved in the
textile sector. In contrast, other sectors, such as the
branches of the alimentary industries, faced some diffi
culties to follow the growth of national consumption.
This is why agriculture and the alimentary industries,
particularly cereal transformation, occupied an important
place in the next plan (1980-1984) .
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 251
TABLE 58
INVESTMENT IN MILLIONS OF DINARS, 1974-77
Sector Expenditures Percent
Industry 48.000 43.5 Agriculture 12.005 10.9 Hydraulic 4.600 4.2 Tourism 1.500 1.4 Fishing 155 0.1 Economic infrastructure 15.521 14.0 Education, training 9.947 9.0 Social 14.610 13.3 Administrative equipment 1.399 1.3 Research & divers 2.520 2.3 Total 110.217 100.0
SOURCE: Secretariat d'Etat au plan, II plan Quadriennal 1974-77 (Alger: Imprimerie Offi cielle, 1974), p. 89.
Due to natural problems and the lack of competent
cadres, the agricultural sector did not improve. During
the first plan, some efforts were made to identify the
problems of the rural sector. During the second plan,
efforts were directed to the structural and technical
conditions that were to lead to a rapid development of the
agricultural economy. The agrarian revolution was intro
duced as a new form of land exploitation. The two years
of application that the agrarian revolution witnessed
during the first plan had achieved some good results.
More than 700,000 hectares of land were distributed among
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 2
60,000 beneficiaries organized in almost 4,000 coopera
tives of different types.
The period of the second plan was to be the decisive
period for putting the agrarian revolution in operation.
This plan aimed at improving the utilization of fertiliz
ers, enlarging the mechanical means of exploitation, and
improving the cadres of the agricultural sector.
The agricultural policy of the second plan was
marked, more than the previous plan, by the transformation
and consolidation of the material and structural base of
the rural parts of the country in order to improve the
standard of living of the rural masses.
The evolution of the Algerian economy during the
1974-77 plan period was characterized by substantial
growth in the non-hydrocarbons sector, especially in
industry and construction. However, the implementation of
the plan generated imbalances in the distribution of
investment between the economic sectors, such as industry
and agriculture.
Regionalization of investment was an important ele
ment of the 1974-77 plan. Heavy industrial projects under
the plan were located in several regions of the country.
The lack of industrial experience in the regions and
frequent delays in establishing the necessary supporting
infrastructure were serious obstacles to efficient opera
tion. Special programs for the least-favored wilayas
(provinces) and urban and commune development programs
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 3
were implemented during the period of the second four-year
plan in order to build economic and social infrastructure
and create productive activities needed by secondary
cities and rural communes. Under the plan, a total of DA
11 billion was budgeted for those programs, representing
40 percent of government direct investment and 10 percent
of the country's total fixed investment. Implementation
of the regional programs suffered delays because of insuf
ficient local capacity to identify, prepare and execute
projects and lack of coordination and support at the
central level. About 250 regional industrial projects had
been started at the end of 1979.
Expansion was particularly rapid in manufacturing and
construction, reflecting the high level of investment.
Investment and public consumption were the most dynamic
domestic demand components during the plan period. Public
consumption increased at an average rate of 15 percent per
year, reflecting the expansion of public employment and
services.
The First Five Year-Plan (1980-1984)
The first five-year plan provided another opportunity
to examine economic and sectoral policies. The efforts
accomplished during the previous two plans were in favor
of heavy industry. In the first five-year plan, large
investment in the industrial sectors continued. Although
more emphasis was placed on light industry, agriculture
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 4
and infrastructure, the priority given to hydrocarbons as
a means of raising financial resources was maintained.
Algerian planners utilized the two-year transitional
period of 1978-1979 to draw conclusions and to formulate a
detailed policy for the next plan, which covered the
1980-84 period. At the time of this writing, the five-
year plan is still in the course of implementation. The
major objectives of this plan are as follows:
1. Correction of sectoral development imbalances
2. Improvement of the efficiency of the economic
system and of financial management in general
3. Satisfying basic social needs and improving the
quality of life
4. Elimination of under-utilization of production
capacities
Agriculture, water development, and the social sec
tors such as housing, training, economic infrastructure,
regional development and education have been given more
attention in this plan. The emphasis placed on heavy
industries indicates that Algeria is continuing its depen
dency on the hydrocarbons sector over the long term.
Since independence, the emphasis on developing the
manufacturing and hydrocarbons sectors has led to a seri
ous decline in agricultural production. In 1979, agricul
ture contributed less than 7 percent to Algeria's GNP,
although over half (55%) of the Algerian people still
derive their livelihood from farming. The 1980-84
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 5
Algerian development plan attempted to reverse the pattern
of relative neglect by allocating over DA 47 billion to
improve and expand crop productive and modernize farming
methods (see Table 59) .
TABLE 59
TOTAL INVESTMENT ALLOCATIONS, 1980-1984 (DA billion)
Total Sector Investment Percent
Industry 154.5 38 Hydrocarbons 63.0 — Agriculture and water 47.1 10.6 Agriculture 24.1 — Infrastructure, transport and communication 36.5 — Social infrastructure 118.5 32 Housing 60.0 — Education and training 42.2 — Other 44.0 — Total 400.6 100
SOURCE: COMET, The 1980-84 Algerian Five Year Plan (London: Committee for Middle East Trade, 1981), p. 30.
Although the government remains committed to a policy
of rapid industrialization, the new plan acknowledges that
more immediate attention must be given to improving the
conditions of living for the average Algerian. This is
the first time the development plan seems to take into
account the social requirements of Algeria which result
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 6
from its high population growth rate (3.3% per year) and
the predominance in the population as a whole of young
people (over 50% are under the age of 18).
According to the above table, total allocations show
the significant shift of emphasis under the first five-
year plan. For example, investment in social infrastruc
ture (particularly housing, health, education and train
ing) registers a marked increase under this plan, account
ing for 32 percent of total allocated expenditures, com
pared with 38 percent for industry. In addition, invest
ment under this plan has increased significantly in com
parison with earlier development plan targets. The 1980-
84 plan provides for the expenditure of DA 400 billion,
compared with target expenditures of DA 110 billion for
the second four-year plan, 1974-77 (see Table 60).
TABLE 60
TOTAL INVESTMENT IN INDUSTRY AND AGRICULTURE THROUGHOUT DEVELOPMENT PLANS (Billions of DA)
Sector 1967-69 % 1970-73 % 1974-77 % 1980-84 %
Total investments 12 27 110 400
Industry 5.400 42.8 12.400 45 48.000 43.50 154.5 38
Agriculture 1.900 15 4.140 15 12.005 10.9 24.1 10.6
NOTE: For 1967-69 figures see p. 239; for 1970-73 see Table 56, p. 245; for 1974-77 see Table 58, p. 251; for 1980-84 plan see Table 59, p. 255.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 7
The priority assigned to hydrocarbons as principal
target of finance is maintained. A consensus has been
reached among the Algerian authorities in favor of a
policy for conservation of the country's hydrocarbons
resources. The study of the five-year plan should take
into consideration the policy for conservation of hydro
carbon resources recently decided by the government. With
respect to gas, the authorities have re-examined the
program for construction of plants for gas liquefaction
and have already cancelled some projects. For example,
the installed capacity for export of liquefied gas and
natural gas is only about 41 percent billion cubic meters
in the last year, 1984, and to be 47 percent billion cubic
meters in 1988, compared with 57 percent and 80 billion
cubic meters, respectively, in the original program. The
authorities had reduced output to about 45 million tons in
1980 (52.5 million tons in 1979). The assumptions for
crude oil output for the period 1980-1989 imply a reduc
tion of about 15 percent from the levels projected in the
original long-term plan for hydrocarbons development.
Over the entire period 1980-89, about 75 million tons
corresponding to two years of output would be saved in
this way, based on earlier forecasts. Previous projec
tions for condensate and refined products are not sub
stantially changed.
With regard to prices, the projection takes into
account the price of oil as established for 1980 and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 8
thereafter of an annual increase of about 3 percent. The
average price of gas is less predictable in view of on
going negotiations concerning various sales contracts and
the wide differences between the actual and projected
prices among the various contracts. In 1979, the average
export price of Algerian gas came out at $1.18 per million
BTU. The principle underlying the ongoing negotiation
between Algeria and its main partners in the U.S. and
Europe consists of an alignment of the price of gas with
the price of crude oil in terms of thermic equivalent.
The fact should be taken into account that transport cost
of gas to the buying countries and treatment cost in these
countries are substantially higher than that of crude oil.
Due to the relatively rapid growth of the non
hydrocarbons economy, Algeria was able to maintain an
overall GDP growth of about 6.5 percent during 1980-84,
although the projected overall growth was set for 7.2
percent a year during the same period. During the second
five year plan (1985-89) GDP growth is expected to remain
rapid in the non-hydrocarbon sector and to reach 6.2
percent, as Table 62 indicates.
Beyond the period of the first five-year plan (1980-
84) , gas export volumes would become very important.
Since Algeria's strategy is now to adjust gas and oil
export volumes to the levels needed to achieve domestic
and external financial equilibrium, a more active policy
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 5 9
for conservation of hydrocarbon resources would be pur
sued.
TABLE 61
AVERAGE ANNUAL AMOUNTS OF FIXED INVESTMENT AND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (Billions of 1979 Algerian Dinars)
Fixed Investment 1979 1980-84 1985-89 1980-84 1985-89
Hydrocarbons sector 16.2 14.4 9.9 -7.5 -2.6 Industrial sectors 14.1 16.3 23.0 6.7 5.8 Other sectors 21.8 34.9 54.3 14.9 7.8 Total 52.1 65.6 87.2 7.2 6.2
SOURCE: World Bank, Algeria, Recent Economic Develop ments and Prospects: The Five-Year Plan, 1980-84 (Washing ton D.C., World Bank, 1980), p. 29.
After the second five-year plan (1984-89), Algeria's
exports, consisting mainly of hydrocarbons, may remain
stagnant in volume and, with growing import needs, large
resource deficits may also reemerge. The conservation
policy, by reducing the volume of oil exports in the years
ahead and spreading the development of natural gas
resources over time, will permit sustained growth of
export volumes over a long period until such time as the
economy is in a position to replace hydrocarbons by other
export products. At the same time, the changes that have
taken place in the geographical distribution of gas sales
contracts conducted by Algeria — now mainly with European
countries — have led the authorities to reconsider the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 260
program of construction of gas liquefaction plan in favor
of expansion of export capacity by gas pipelines, first
via Tunisia to Italy and second directly to Spain (see
Table 62).
TABLE 62
LNG AND NATURAL GAS EXPORT CONTRACTS
Planned Period of Quantity Delivery Contract Buyer (Billion M) Date (Years)
Operational contracts British Gas Council (Canvey Island) 1.11 1964 15 Gas de France (le Havre) 0.56 1964 25 Gas de France (FOS) 3.70 1972 25 Distrigas-USA (Boston) 1.20 1978 20 Enagas (Spain) 4.76 1980 23 El Paso I-USA (Cove Point) 10.95 1978 25
Contracts signed and approved Distrigas-Belgium (Zeebruge) 5.29 1980 2 Gas de France (Montoire) 5.45 1980 2 Trunkline-Panhandle USA 4.76 1981 2 (Lake Charles) Thyssengas/Brigitta (West Germany) 11.90 1983 20 Ruhrgas/Salzgitter (West Germany) 1983 2 Sub-Total 53.91
Gas pipeline to Italy 13.07 1982 20
Tunisia gas pipeline 1.20 1982 2
SOURCE: World Bank, Algeria: Recent Economic Develop- ments and Prospects, The Five-Year Plan, p. 91.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 261
The share of investment in the non-industrial sectors
has increased from 42 percent of the total in 1979 to 59
percent in 1984 and would increase to 64 percent in 1989.
Such an effort of investment in favor of the non
industrial sectors — agriculture, water resources, con
struction, economic and social infrastructure and services
— would have considerable strength and priority. The
production of the non-hydrocarbons sectors depend to a
large extent on future progress in improving the efficien
cy of the economic system. The efficiency of the economy
depends also on the following main factors:
1. The implementation of the first and the second
five-year plans which aimed at restructuring investment in
favor of economic and social infrastructure and making
existing industrial capacities profitable
2. The industrial experience that Algeria has now
acquired after more than twenty-two years of accelerated
development, enabling it to obtain better control over
existing production
3. The moderation of investment growth, particularly
in industry, making it possible to devote greater atten
tion to inter- and intra-sectoral coordination
4. More skilled workers, technicians and managers,
who should become available as a result of the important
training efforts being pursued, attracting skilled emi
grant workers back home
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 262
Some improvements in efficiency have already been
achieved in a number of industries during the first five-
year plan. Continued improvement in the efficiency of the
economy will also depend on:
1. Effective implementation of management decen
tralization in all production sector and strengthening
planning
2. Reorganizing of the socialist sector and public
enterprises
3. Improving the system of input and supply
4. Facilitating the operation of production units in
general
5. Strengthening the role of the financial system
6. Worker participation in decision making
As far as the first five-year plan is concerned, a
growing proportion of investment has been channelled to
economic and social infrastructures, particularly housing
and education. The growth of agriculture has remained
relatively low during the plan period. Agricultural
exports remained at the same level throughout the period
in view of the priority given to supplying the domestic
market. Food import is seen in relation to balance be
tween consumption demand and agricultural production.
While imports are to eliminate shortages of certain
consumer goods, strict management of import requirements
have also been taken into account.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 6 3
Total consumption has continued to grow at about 9
percent, reflecting the expected increase in public out
lets for the operation of the administrative and social
infrastructure and the effect of the policies to expand
employment, satisfy basic social needs, and improve the
quality of life. The decline in the deficit and the
external dept will depend on the policy followed with
respect to volume and prices of oil and gas exports during
the second five-year plan (1985-89).
With the growing needs of a rapidly expanding popula
tion and recent shortfalls in domestic agricultural pro
duction, Algeria has become increasingly dependent on
foreign suppliers of foodstuffs. The United States has
long been a major supplier of agricultural products to
Algeria, principally wheat, cotton, and beans. According
to a study carried out by the Committee for Middle East
Trade, the food and consumer goods imports is expected to
rise from just under DA 10 billion in 1979 to over DA 13 4 billion by 1984. During the 1980-84, food and consumer
goods will continue to represent 21 percent of total
imports. The imports of raw materials, semi-finished
products and capital goods for industry will remain vital,
which together will account for 59 percent of import
requirements.
4 COMET, The 1980-84 Algerian Five Year Plan (London: Committee for Middle East Trade, 1981), pp. 4-5.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 264
Projections of agricultural imports for 1985 are
shown in Table 63. As already noted, the country imports
almost all of its butter and sugar, a third of its milk, a
fifth of its grain, and in the process spends almost a
third of its hydrocarbons receipts. With the population
increasing as fast as was noted earlier, it is unlikely
indeed that this heavy demand for agricultural products
will also slow.
TABLE 63
PROJECTED IMPORTS OF SELECTED AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES, 1985 (Millions of dollars)
1985 Commodities Projections
Cereals and flour 788 Sugar 303 Dairy products 370 Fats and oil 259 Meats 176 Subtotal 1,896
Other food and agricultural products 2,387
Total 4,283
SOURCE: Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978), p. 126.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 6 5
The 1980-84 plan continued to allocate heavy invest
ment to the steel, nonferrous metals, mechanical-
electrical engineering, and construction material indus
tries. Light industry is being expanded and new plants of
all sizes are being opened every year. Many of the plants
suffer from a lack of skilled labor, but the government is
investing large sums in education and training to overcome
this problem. If we judge according to the evolution of
investments, we observe that agriculture has been given a
very limited place in the strategy of development, and
massive capital has been devoted to the industrial sector
and hydrocarbons (Table 64).
TABLE 64
BREAKDOWN OF TOTAL INVESTMENT
Constantine Plan Billions of DA (Millions of F.F.) 1967-69 1969-73 1973-77
Total investment 27,750 12,090 33,000 110,000 Agriculture 3,900 2,400 4,500 12,000 Industry 8,800 5,200 17,700 48,000 Hydrocarbons 5,500 2,800 8,000 19,500
SOURCE: Benhouria Tahar, L'economie de 1'Algerie (Paris: Maspero, 1980), p. 138.
Agriculture occupies an important place in public
speeches, but in reality the gap is very large between
what is being said and what is being done. The objectives
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 6 6
and principles of Algerian agrarian policy have been fixed
since the beginning. They are inscribed in all national
development programs since the Soummam Congress, taken up
by the revolutionary council of 19 June 1965, made more
precise in the preliminary project of the agrarian revolu
tion, elaborated by the FLN in 1968, then in the Charter
of the agrarian revolution in 1970, and finally in the
National Charter 1976. However, the concrete application
to this agrarian policy did not take place successfully,
because of the priority given to the industrial sector
that characterized the development policy since indepen
dence, and the bureaucratic nature of the administration.
The contradictions that exist in this type of devel
opment and that have been aggravated through the years are
found in the realization of new resources, such as gas and
oil. A large part of revenues of these activities were
concentrated in the hands of government, the entrepreneurs
and the directors of state companies. The quantitative
growth of the unequal development in agriculture and
industrialization of the Algerian economy was not only due
to the levels of investment in the two sectors, but also
due to the formation of a state bourgeoisie linked to
industrialization and bureaucratic management of the
economy. This is not the only form that expresses the
industrialist strategy adopted in Algeria by the dominant
class, but salaries, price system, and land are other
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 267
factors that were responsible for this unequal develop
ment .
The price system since independence has been in favor
of industry. From 1962 to 1974, the prices of agricultur
al products were relatively stable, compared to the rapid
increase of price of products oriented toward agriculture
by the industry (machines, fertilizers, construction,
etc.). This situation was a direct consequence of the
Algerian economic dependency on the international market,
and its influence exercised upon internal prices. The
local prices of industrial products were partly determined
by their sales prices in the foreign markets.
The price system resulted in unequal conditions for
the reproduction of the labor force. The dissimilarity
between the two sectors did not touch only the low salary
categories, but all categories of workers: skilled and
unskilled, manual and labor workers. For example, 30,000
workers in SONATRACH received in 1972 a total salary of
nearly DA 600 million, while 250,000 employees in the
self-managed agricultural sector reached only DA 450
million.
In terms of land, thousands of hectares of the best
land for cultivation have been transformed into industrial
zones. The region of Annaba, Rouiba, Reghaia, the zone of
Mitidja, are only examples. Out of these more essential
zones, other land was transferred also to the industrial
zones of Arzew (1600 hectares in the first phase), Tiaret
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 6 8
(1300 hectares), Jijel (800 to 1600 hectares) Bouira (200
to 300 hectares), etc. As a result, this land was lost
for agriculture. It was not only productive land, but
also rich with a working population and stock of diverse
agricultural materials.
The conclusion is that, in the course of the last
years, the rate of transferring agricultural land to the
industrial sector has been intensified. The bureaucratic
bourgeoisie has a negative point of view toward agricul
ture. The same bureaucrats who favored the growth and
construction of industry caused the underdevelopment of
agriculture.
The three categories of the conditions of reproduc
tion that we have analyzed: investment, salaries and
prices, and finally land and water, are real factors and
basic conditions of agricultural production. Unemploy
ment, immigration, and urbanization have basically been
shaped by the development strategy elaborated and put into
operation by the bureaucratic bourgeoisie.
If we analyze the alimentary production, the picture
will be even clearer. The production of cereal has been
inferior to consumption since 1962. With the growth of
urban population, Algeria became more dependent on foreign
markets: 1 450,000-ton deficit in 1969, 1 980,000-ton
deficit in 1972. Expenditures of imported goods of con
sumption were very high: DA 820 million in 1964, DA 1,077
million in 1972, DA 6,300 million in 1975. For example,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 6 9
in 1980 a large demand could not be satisfied by local
production. The deficit especially touched cereals,
sugar, meat, and milk. The deficit in the alimentary
products is not likely to disappear soon.
Algeria's continuing importation of agricultural
products will remain strong. The country is a long-time
importer of U.S. agricultural commodities, particularly
wheat, cotton, and beans. Overall, Algeria's imports of
agricultural products from all sources have been increas
ing fairly steadily throughout the decade (Table 65).
TABLE 65
ALGERIA'S AGRICULTURAL IMPORTS (Millions of dollars)
Year Imports
1969 167.2 1970 173.5 1971 206.4 1972 301.4 1973 448.6 1974 880.0 1975 1,377.0 1976 1,011.0 1977 1,350.0 1985 4,283.0'
SOURCE: This table constructed from data pro vided in Jack Kramer, Algeria (New York: Chase World Information Corp.), p. 126.
a. Table 63.
The situation of the working class did not change
much. The average annual salary, in the textile branch in
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7 0
1969, was DA 4,892 for the enterprises that employed more
than 200 workers and only DA 4,436 for enterprises with
fewer than 20 employees. Even within the same branch, the
workers' wages differ, for instance, in hydrocarbons. It
appears that, in the light of these figures, the distribu
tion of salaries in the industry is resembling a capital
ist structure with inequality of salaries in different
productive branches.
It seems clear that the distribution of income in
Algeria essentially determined by the amount of capital
revenue. It could be explained as competition among the
branches and between the national companies in order to
attract the skilled category of workers. Otherwise, how
can we account for different incomes for the same work in
different branches? Unequal distribution of income is
also due to the size of the enterprises. (We have seen in
Chapter V the inequal development of the different indus
trial enterprises, SONATRACH). The concentration of
capital in these branches explains this phenomenon. For
example, the workers who work for SONATRACH earn more than
those who possess the same skills and work in the textile
or leather enterprises. The size of capital and rentabil
ity determine the size of incomes. Therefore, the workers
in the branches with less capital and lower rentability
are still underpaid.
The over-exploitation of the workers in the sectors
that are less advanced, and the enterprises that are less
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7 1
important, as well as the inequality of salaries among the
branches, is linked directly to the size of capital that
each company possesses, the concentration of the invest
ment in some branches, and the disequilibrium between the
industry and agriculture.
This can explain also the failure and weakness of the
U.G.T.A. (Union Generale de Travailleurs Algerienne) and
its shift to become a bureaucratic apparatus instead of an
organization defending the interests of the working mass
es. Although U.G.T.A. achieved some relative autonomy
during the period of transition, its function was abol
ished by the party later on. It has been under criticism
since independence by the bureaucratic bourgeoisie. The
committee for preparing the third congress (1966), desig
nated by the U.G.T.A., was eliminated and replaced by a
special committee nominated by the party, which was under
the authority of Raid Ahmed. This means that the working
classes had lost their representative at the national
level. The 1966 report of the U.G.T.A. made the following
remarks:
Since the realization of December 1962 Accord, things have been developing. This development always manifests the same direction, which means Party-UGTA. We understand all the formulas: UGTA is a national organization with the party; UGTA is a national organization after the party; UGTA is a national organization for the Party; UGTA is a national organization within the party We have to confess to the upper authorities of the Party that the only relations that we have had with the party since its establishment have been relations of subordina tion: contacts took place only for us to be
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7 2
informed that we had to follow the rules, that we were prohibited from doing this or that. Never have we been invited to conferences dealing with unemployment or dealing with the question related to the training and education of militants.
Conclusion
The structure of investment with regard to agricul
ture and industry has drawn heavy criticism even from
within Algeria. Some have argued that if equity is a
concern, then certainly 55 percent of the population
should receive greater attention.
Planned economic development in Algeria began with
the three-year plan (1967-69), which represented the first
phase of a long range development program running into the
1980s. The three-year plan was followed by the first
four-year plan (1970-73) and the second four-year plan
(1974-77). The two succeeding years, 1978 and 1979, were
viewed by Algerian officials as a period of "transition"
during which attempts were made to complete the many
projects started during the previous first and second
four-year plans. The first five-year plan followed as
another step in the economic development of the country.
All these economic development plans, without exception,
have emphasized the establishment of a capital-intensive
5Annuaire de l'Afrique du Nord (Paris: Centre Nation al de la Recherche Scientifique, 1966), p. 628.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7 3
industry, involving hydrocarbons, iron and steel, chemi
cals, and engineering, to serve as a basis for economic
growth and industrialization.
Algeria's three-year plan allocated investment total
ling DA 12 billion, of which 5,400 million (or 42.8%) went
to industry and only 1,900 million (or 15%) went to agri
culture (see Table 60). During the first four-year plan,
total investment was DA 27 billion. 12,400 million (or
45%) was devoted to industry and only 4,140 million (or
15%) was directed to agriculture (see Table 56) .
Algeria's second four-year plan allocated investments
totaling DA 110 billion. As in the first four-year plan,
industrialization continued to receive top priority, with
43.5 percent of total planned outlets, while agriculture
received only 10.9 percent (see Table 58).
Agriculture has been consistently misrepresented.
Consequently, increasing rural-urban inequality, rapid
migration, and uneven development was the result. This is
due not only to the natural constraints and lack of human
resources, but mainly to the industrialization policy
followed by the government. At this point, we come to the
same conclusion that was achieved by the Committee for
Middle East Trade in its research on Algerian economic
development and industrialization:
1. The great emphasis laid on heavy industry (including hydrocarbons) under previous plans has resulted in a unacceptably high level of external indebtedness.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7 4
2. At the same time, industrial development has not resulted in a steady flow of products which the domestic market urgently needs; there have been bad bottlenecks and performance failures. 3. The failure to put an equivalent amount of effort into agricultural development has result ed in an increasing requirement for imported foodstuffs.
Under the first five-year plan (1980-84), more empha
sis was placed on infrastructure, housing, agriculture,
education, and light industry. Thirty-two percent of
total expenditures was devoted to social infrastructure,
compared with 38 percent allocated to industry. Although
the development of agriculture is still inferior in terms
of investment, cuts in the industry and hydrocarbons
budgets are registered under the five-year plan, with 38
percent compared to 43.5 percent during the previous
(1974-77) plan (see Table 59). This could be seen as the
first step in the right direction. The following graph
shows the general investment trend of industrialization
and agriculture during the last two decades.
^COMET, The 1980-84 Algerian Five Year Plan, p. 3.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 275
GRAPH 4
GENERAL INVESTMENT TREND OF INDUSTRY AND AGRICULTURE, 1967-84 (IN DA BILLION)
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1967-69 1970-73 1974-77 1980-84
Source: Table 60, P. 256
Industry (including hydrocarbons)
Agriculture
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 276
GRAPH 5
TRENDS OF POPULATION AND AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Iirports
Populatic n
liheat Processing
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985
Note: See table 10, P. 75; table 65, P. 269; and table 42, P. 205.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER IX
ALGERIAN SOCIALISM AND FOREIGN DEPENDENCY
Introduction
Policy planners in Algeria face a central challenge.
On the one hand, they are making a determined effort to
transform the economy rapidly, largely through the intro
duction of foreign technologies. On the other hand, in
the absence of a well-developed infrastructural and
skilled manpower base, they are attempting to do so with
out increasing dependency upon foreign suppliers, without
loosening control over internal economic, social and
political developments, and without weakening or destroy
ing indigenous cultures, traditions, and values.
The purpose of this chapter is to assess how these
aims have been addressed in the technology transfer poli
cies of Algeria and the challenges which lie ahead. More
specifically, the aim of this chapter is to explore the
problem of foreign dependency. It will discuss tech
nological and scientific dependency and its effects on the
recipient country; the problem of foreign capital depen
dency and how industrialization in Algeria is being fin
anced; and finally the problem of foreign skilled labor
dependency. In addition, the chapter will try to trace
277
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7 8
the type of socialism Algeria is adopting at this stage of
economic and industrial development.
Technological and Scientific Dependency
Generally speaking, technology has developed from the
demand for solutions to problems associated with man's
needs in the real world. In this research, "technology
transfer" means a process in which one party provides and
another party attains a capability. This capability
allows the recipient to carry out an operation or process
which the recipient could not previously perform, or could
carry out only with lower efficiency. The term of "tech
nology transfer" here covers not only the transfer of the
products which are manufactured to satisfy Algeria's
needs, but also the know-how required for their operation,
repair, and maintenance. When we speak of the "transfer
of technology", we are not referring merely to the trans
fer of equipment, but also to the related know-how.
Algeria is one of the few cases in which industrial
technology imports have formed the core of its economic
development. Like other developing nations, Algeria is
engaged in an industrialization and development effort
which involves considerable importation of foreign tech
nology. However, technology transfer is only one part of
a broader development process, so that choices affecting
the selection, importation and utilization of foreign
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 7 9
technologies are by nature linked to policies affecting
development as a whole.
In Algeria, there has been no developed technology
transfer policy as such. Nor is there one best approach
to technology transfer anywhere in the world. Instead,
technology transfer choices are normally made within the
context of broader development goals, and these have
depended upon the resources of each country, its develop
ment strategies and the political and social context in
which development is to occur. It is useful to briefly
examine the development strategy in Algeria and see how it
has affected the type selected for technology transfer
before discussing the effects and policies related to
technology transfer.
Algerian Development Strategies
After gaining its political independence in 1962,
Algeria embarked on a development program in which indus
try played a major role. During the period of transition
1962-1965, Algerian industry was mainly concerned with
light industry, therefore it was oriented toward the
production of consumer goods. For example, the industries
established in this period were as follows: textiles,
leather and tannery, shoes, and food industries. During
the Ben Bella regime, the policy of economic development
was in favor of light industry and the development of
agriculture.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 0
However, after Houari Boumediene took over in 1965,
and particularly since 1967, Algeria has adopted quite
different strategies to promote socio-economic develop
ment. The new strategy was aimed at achieving the follow
ing objectives:
1. In the long term, Algeria will attain the stage
of innovation
2. The consumption goods industry will be able to
satisfy national needs
3. The industrial sector will create 400,000 new
jobs per year
The new regime claimed that the development of the economy
cannot be achieved without the development of hydrocarbons
and heavy industries, which will bring about independent
national development. The major change in development
policy was the shift from labor-intensive industries to
capital-intensive industries, from development directed
primarily to infrastructure and agriculture into develop
ment oriented toward heavy industry and the hydrocarbons
sector. The price paid for this policy was, of course,
dependency upon foreign technology and the maintenance of
a high level of unemployment.
The economic policies followed from 1965 to 1979
aimed at laying the base for capital-intensive, high
technology, export-oriented industries, and the use of
Algeria's energy resources to supply this industrial
system. The hope was that by the time the oil and gas
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 1
income declined, at least some industries would be inter
nationally competitive and able to replace energy sales as
foreign exchange earners.
In 1967, the Algerian government launched its first
development plan, aimed at massive heavy industrializa
tion. The primary emphasis in government investment was
on heavy industry, which continued into the second and
third plan periods. The plans between 1970-73 and 1974-
77, for example, were more ambitious than previous poli
cies in terms of investing domestic and foreign capital
into programs and projects designed to develop Algerian
heavy industry. Between 1970 and 1977, Algeria invested
heavily in industry, completely neglecting the agricultur
al sector. During the period of 1970-1977, the plans
called for investment between 42 to 45 percent of the
total budget for industry.*
During the 1970s, Algeria was one of the world's
fastest growing markets for engineering products, con
struction and technical services. Thanks to rising oil
revenues, oil production gained the financial resources
needed to purchase these imports. During the past two
decades, Algeria has rapidly expanded its imports of
advanced civilian equipment and technologies. The main
foreign projects initiated in Algeria over the past two
^Ministry of Planning and Regional Development, "Invertisement," Synthese du bilan economique et social de la decennie (Alger: May 1980), p. 5.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 2
decades have mainly occurred in the following three sec
tors: the hydrocarbons sector, which can be considered an
example of technological transfers contributing to the
development of export industries; heavy industry, with
technological transfers contributing to the development of
the industrialization process and meeting local demand;
and light industry, with technological transfers contrib
uting to the improvement of local living conditions.
During the last few years, the country has signed
numerous contracts with international firms in an effort
to gain both their technology and know-how. As a result,
the volume of technological transfers from industrialized
countries to Algeria has grown. The major Algerian sup
pliers of technology are the U.S.A., France, West Germany,
Italy, Spain, England, Belgium, and Canada.
Algeria became a very competitive marketplace, and
suppliers specialized in certain types of exports. The
U.S. has been an important supplier of machinery equip
ment, particularly aircraft and technical services, in
cluding large-scale projects management and provision of
technical support. French firms have been particularly
prominent in public works projects, while Japanese firms
have continued to export automobiles and consumer elec
tronics to Algeria. West German firms have had a compara
tive advantage in exporting buses and transport equipment,
while Italy has been more specialized in exporting textile
products and equipment, and construction material.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 3
Technology utilization or absorption by the recipient
is a critical part of technology transfer. The extent of
technology absorption depends on the type of capability
developed by the recipient country. In the Algerian case,
the experience shows that technology is not fully util
ized. A number of factors restrict technology absorption.
These factors all relate to the fact that Algeria is
constrained in its ability to fully utilize imported
technology by shortages of technical and managerial per
sonnel. In addition, Algeria is challenged to use foreign
technologies and personnel in meeting development goals,
without creating irreconcilable conflicts with its tradi
tions and values.
Although the growing hydrocarbons industries have
been in a position to help finance these capital-intensive
projects themselves, there remains a need for foreign
assistance. This type of technology transfer obliged
Algeria to operate the facilities by relying extensively
on foreign managers and technicians. Over the long run,
maintenance of the facilities and development of a skilled
manpower base will be the key problem for Algerian petro
chemical firms.
The comparative success of a recipient in utilizing
these technologies stems from a number of factors, includ
ing skilled labor, developed infrastructure, the length of
experience and the emphasis on local markets. This
research indicates that technology absorption in Algeria
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 4
has been limited to the development of a capabil
ity to operate and maintain facilities in the sectors
examined.
In the late 1970s, declining oil revenues, infra
structural problems, evaluation of plan performance, and
other political factors subsequently led to reevaluations
of development plans, strategies, and priorities in
Algeria. The scope of plans was often cut back, sectoral
priorities shifted, and goals became more circumscribed.
As mentioned before, the early 1970s, in conjunction
with the oil price rises, saw a rapid influx of technology
to Algeria. One direct effect of the cutbacks in expendi
tures in the late 1970s and a shift towards greater empha
sis on more modest rates of economic growth, was the rate
of technology trade. For example, the indefinite shelving
of expensive large-scale industrial projects has been an
immediate consequence of the decision to slow down the
rhythm of rapid industrialization. The second steel plant
and the construction of a new part at Jijel have been
deferred to the second five-year plan (1985-1989). Like
wise, the project to construct Algeria's third gas lique
faction plant, for which Foster-Wheeler held the original
contract, was shelved indefinitely, as was a new aluminum
complex which was to be financed with Soviet money.
In the early 1980s, Algerian planners began to re
evaluate the performance of these plans, and the detri
mental effects they had had on the non-industrial sector
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 5
of Algeria's economy. Especially after 1978, with the
death of President Boumediene, domestic critics within the
government planning community began criticizing the stra
tegy of heavy or massive industrialization. With rela
tively severe financial constraints, the role of the
private sector and foreign involvement was also reas
sessed.
At the beginning of the 1980s, plans were sharply cut
back, priorities shifted to the long-neglected agricultur
al and infrastructural sectors. A socialist tendency has
not been abandoned completely, but has become less empha
sized. The beginning of the 1980s also saw an opening up
of the Algerian economy, and a shift in Algerian priori
ties toward the development of infrastructure, human
resources, and agriculture. Table 68 shows the expendi
tures for the latest five year plan, 1980-84. The plan
still calls for the greater investment to be in industry,
totalling 154.5 billion AD, but its share of total planned
investment has declined to 38 percent. While industrial
development is still fundamental to Algeria's long-term
policy, the focus has shifted from heavy to light indus
try. The country's critical housing shortage has received
an investment allocation of 60 billion AD of total planned
investment, and education, training and social infra
structure together comprise about 118.5 billion AD of
total planned investment.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 6
Technological Transfers Policy
As already mentioned, there is no comprehensive
technology transfer policy, but only an attempt to improve
capacities for selecting and utilizing foreign technolo
gies. Algeria tried to develop an implicit strategy for
dealing with technology transfer choices in conjunction
with its development planning. Algeria faces choices
concerning regulation of foreign businesses, choice of
suppliers, financing education and manpower policies, and
institutional mechanisms for carrying out technology
transfer. As suggested by official plans and import
trends, Algeria, as a developing country, has depended
heavily on imports of technology, and this dependence is
likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
The policy chosen after 1965 effectively changed the
structure of economic development and took investment away
from agriculture, housing and infrastructure, towards
hydrocarbons and heavy industries. This policy created in
turn the need for imported technology. The major goals
underlying government policies of technological transfers
can be summed up as follows:
1. To motivate the development of export industries
2. To meet local demands
3. To gradually develop local technologies
4. To improve the capacity and output of domestic
industrial units
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 7
5. To acquire technologies appropriate to local
requirements
However, testing these goals against actual practice
reveals that they seem only to diversify dependence,
because Algeria has not been able to change its position
from licensee to licensor. The contribution of imported
technology to exports has been limited, since the major
Algerian exports are still raw materials and products of
light industries such as textiles and leathers. In the
final analysis, the challenge to policy makers is to
design policies which enhance the mutually beneficial
aspects of technology trade, without being completely
subordinated to foreign economic conditions and policies.
All of these development strategies and goals have
called for the transfer of a variety of advanced technolo
gies from abroad. Until recently, Algeria paid much
attention to the import of technology in its official
policies. In most cases, technology transfer was conduct
ed in an almost random way, without any overarching policy
to guide it. With the re-evaluation of development poli
cies and goals which occurred in the beginning of 1980s,
however, specific approaches towards technology transfer
began to emerge.
Of equal importance, changes in development priori
ties were also associated with changes in the type of
technology selected. One key issue regarding the selec
tion of technology to achieve development aims has been
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 8
the decision to import capital- or labor-intensive tech
nologies. In Algeria, where limited capital but unskilled
labor is available, this issue represents a central policy
debate.
Some planners argue that capital-intensive technolo
gies in certain sectors can provide modes of labor-
intensive production. Other planners argue that the
tendency to import the most advanced kinds of industrial
technology to Algeria threatens to destroy innovation
among local manufacturers and renders Algeria ever more
dependent upon foreign technologies and suppliers.
Algeria, during the late 1970s, followed the theory that
only the most advanced industrial processes will permit
LDCs to export their manufactures on a competitive basis.
Recently, however, light industry has been emphasized over
heavy industry, and small scale projects have been
emphasized over large scale ones. For Algeria, this has
meant a new orientation in technology transfer, favoring
simpler and more labor-intensive technology importation
and more trade with those nations which have an
international reputation for high quality performance in
subway construction, railway and dam construction,
hospital and housing construction. A few large scale
turnkey projects continue to be awarded mainly in the
petrochemical sectors.
During the past few years, Algeria has begun national
planning exercises to better define policies in this area.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 8 9
Algerian policy makers appear to be aware of the "ad hoc"
nature of their approach to technology transfer, so
Algeria is attempting to improve this situation with the
help of Western consultants. These efforts have so far
yielded limited results. In all cases, the essence of
these debates remains on a broad level. While efforts may
seen promising, technology transfer strategies today
remain ill-defined and largely determined on an ad-hoc
basis. Any policy which is primarily based on oil and gas
exports and the importation of advanced technology seems
in conflict with the effort to expand employment.
The Algerian concept of technology transfer and
economic independence is based on the following implicit
model.
Importation of advanced technology ------» accumulation process of technology ------» economic independence.
Algeria is among the first third world countries that
adopted the above defined model. But the experience of
Algeria reveals that after 20 years of industrial effort,
there is no sign to indicate that economic independence
will be achieved in the near future. On the contrary, the
economy is in a situation where every move in the develop
ment process signifies more dependency.
The Algerian experience confirms that when a techno
logical base does not yet exist, the option of industrial
ization and importation of advanced technology will not
lead to a stage of innovation but will aggravate economic
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 0
dependency, for the medium-term at least. It suggests
that for a small economy engaged in a large-scale indus
trial development process, independence is no more than a
mirage.
The adoption of this growth model brought about the
problem of technological and scientific dependency, and
the call for advanced technology on a massive-scale way
has aggravated the situation of dependency upon the for
eign centers. This problem is being aggravated because
the purchase of machines from abroad does not involve only
the purchase of technology but also the training of pro
fessionals and cadres who will put this technology into
operation. Purchasing technology necessitates first the
preparation of an appropriate technological infrastructure
which does not yet exist in Algeria. In this sense, we
propose the following alternative model:
Education & training + developed infrastructure + capital accumulation -- » accumulation process of technology -- * economic independence and industrialization.
Strategies regarding the mechanisms by which technol
ogy may be transferred are also important, ranging from
those countries emphasizing a strategy of investment in
foreign companies (Kuwait), to those emphasizing joint
ventures (Saudi Arabia), to those emphasizing turnkey
plants (Algeria) and other mechanisms for technology
transfer.
In Algeria, the basic strategy toward technology
transfer has emphasized turnkey plants, with managerial
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 1
and other support offered until operational skills are
transferred to indigenous personnel. Although Algeria has
traditionally emphasized technology transfer through
turnkey operations, it is increasingly searching for the
link to international markets which the joint venture
route provides. Beginning in the early 1980s, Algerian
planners shifted from a reliance on turnkey plants to
joint ventures with foreign partners. The Chadli govern
ment currently prefers joint ventures with foreign firms
on a close-to-equity basis rather than large scale turnkey
contracts, because it hopes that such joint ventures will
encourage more technology transfer through inhouse train
ing of Algerian personnel and the greater long-term com
mitment of the foreign partner to the joint enterprise.
According to one observer, Algeria will do everything
short of declaring herself "capitalist” to encourage this
development during the next decade. She will allow a few
turnkey contracts to be signed primarily in the civil
aviation and petrochemical sectors. The technological
goal is to train her own people to acquire technological
skills suited to local conditions.
Although technology can be transferred in a variety
of ways, there are only three main vehicles for technology
transfer in Algeria: joint venture, turnkey, and licen
sing. In the case of joint venture, most of the large
heavy industries in the country, such as petroleum, refin
ing, petrochemicals, and fertilizers have been established
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 2
through joint ventures. In this joint effort, Algeria
provides the necessary infrastructure, labor and protec
tion for the investment; it also participates in the
management of such ventures.
In the case of major industrial projects, Algeria
buys technology and technical and engineering services
from foreign firms in the developed countries on a turnkey
basis for the establishment of a plant. The foreign firms
will not have any financial stake in the project. The
engineers, scientists and managers of the foreign compa
nies will provide the complete know-how and the training
of local personnel in the operation of the plant.
In the case of license, a formal or legal permission
is to be granted by a country or company that possesses a
particular technology, in order to enable Algeria to
manufacture that particular type of technology on its
land. For example, the Berliet plant in Rouiba is cur
rently producing trucks under a license arrangement with
the French company Berliet.
In Algeria, it is the government and the national
companies that import technologies and make them available
along with all other services. This applies to small and
medium-scale industries such as electronic and textiles,
as well as the heavy and large-scale industries such as
steel, mechanical and petrochemical industries. In the
highly centralized Algerian context, where all foreign
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 3
trade is transacted by the government and national compa
nies, the concerned Ministry of Industry, the Planning
Ministry, and the Ministry of Finance are directly respon
sible for each stage of technological transfers.
With regard to the problems connected with the trans
fer of technology, Algeria, like other third world coun
tries, is still facing the following difficulties:
1. The selection of technology is needed. A tech
nology suitable for one country is not necessarily the
best for another
2. When the technology being imported is the latest
in the field, the experience of Algeria shows, it is not
necessarily the most desirable and appropriate technology
to suit the country's internal conditions and needs
3. The technologies of the developed countries are
usually not specifically geared to the conditions prevail
ing in the developing countries
4. The developing country is given little choice in
the selection of technology when the technology is tied to
foreign aid; the choice is restricted to the technologies
available in the developed country offering the aid
Effects of Technological Transfers
Even though Algeria emerges as one of the leading
third world countries as an importer of industrial tech
nology, this technology has a problematic impact on
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 4
Algerian economic development in general, and on the
question of employment in particular.
First, due to the introduction of new technology and
the intensified use of capital-intensive industrializa
tion, the role of agriculture has declined significantly.
Agriculture's share in GDP declined from 21 percent in
1960 to 7 percent in 1979. Agricultural growth contribut
ed only 4.5 percent to Algeria's total growth of GDP. We
have to understand that the rapid growth in Algeria's GDP
has been primarily the result of increased revenue from
oil and gas. As a result, agriculture has been consis
tently underrepresented. Only 15 percent of total invest
ments in the first four-year plan was allocated to agri
culture compared to the 45 percent that was taken by
industry. In the second four-year plan 10.9 percent was
budgeted for agriculture, whereas 43.5 percent was budget
ed for industry. In the five-year plan, only 10.6 percent
of the budget was for agriculture compared to 38 percent 2 for industry. Algerian dependency on agricultural im
ports has increased sharply since the 1970s, and the
continuation of this trend has prevented Algeria from
obtaining economic independence and self-sufficiency.
Second, in light of Algeria's lack of local skilled
labor and the shortage of technical expertise, the trans
fer of technology to Algeria demanded the importation of
2 World Bank, World Development Report (Washington D.C., World Bank, 1980), p. 29.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 5
foreign skilled labor. This demand has been extensive,
particularly in the oil, gas, and metallurgical indus
tries. This importation of foreign skilled labor has two
negative results: (1) it costs Algeria millions of
dollars to pay for the service they provide; (2) the few
local skilled workers, after their close contact with
foreign professionals, leave the country and emigrate to
European countries to earn more money and enhance their
prestige.
Third, major international technologies are con
trolled and monopolized by multi-national firms which
usually impose, directly or indirectly, the sale of their
capital-intensive industrial equipment. This type of
technology, which is being used now in Algeria, has re
placed the human labor force in both agriculture and
industry. As a result, it has put thousands of employed
Algerians out of their jobs.
Fourth, as a result of technology transfer, the
ecological situation of Algeria has been transformed. The
extensive installation of industrial plants at the expense
of cultivated land has contributed to the scarcity of
agricultural land in the country, causing a considerable
loss for the farmers. As a result, the size of the unem
ployed population has increased in rural areas.
Last, as a direct effect of technological transfers
in Algeria, rural-urban inequality has been increased.
This, of course, has led to a rapid migration off the land
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 6
and a massive number of unemployed people in the cities
and industrial centers.
Technological transfers appear not to generate more
jobs as it was believed they would. In other words, the
impact of technological transfers upon employment proves
once again that it runs counter to the national objectives
of creating a greater number of jobs in order to satisfy
the needs of an increasing number of unemployed people.
Conclusion
There can be no doubt that industrialization cannot
be achieved only by transferring a new technology and
establishing intensive industrial projects, but also in
establishing the necessary infrastructure that will
receive this technology. For instance, human resources
must be developed, engineering and design capability must
be created and expanded, existing research institutions
must be improved, and productivity of national companies
must be increased. When the technological base of Algeria
reaches this level, the country becomes better prepared to
use and benefit from the advanced foreign technologies.
Therefore, economic development is not only a matter of
importing new technology and techniques, but rather of
producing and using this technology in a way that suits
local needs.
The findings of this section clearly confirm that
trade between Algeria and advanced industrialized
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 7
countries is capital- and skill-intensive. All signs
indicate that trade regarding technology transfer will
increase in volume in the future as the industrialization
of the country progresses. This means that reducing
technological dependency on the industrialized countries
is still far from being achieved in the case of Algeria.
Technology transfers to Algeria have created only a few
jobs. This implies that import promotion of advanced
technology and employment policies are in conflict, since
importation of advanced technology usually undermines the
growth of labor-intensive industries. If we are allowed
to generalize the implication of these findings, we can
say that the more technology is exported to developing
countries, the fewer jobs are generated.
Foreign Capital Dependency
The question of financing technology transfer has
been one of the most important policy issues and a major
concern, because Algeria is one of the more capital-short
countries. The dilemma here is that while Algeria is
attempting to avoid foreign dependency, the country has
found itself heavily dependent upon foreign sources in
financing technology transfer. Heavy reliance upon extern
al sources of financing is often associated with a great
degree of dependency upon the supplier of funds. This
section examines the policy approach adopted by Algeria
that led to contradiction between establishing socialism
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 8
and the participation of foreign capital in financing the
development.
Since 1978, the Algerian state has held a monopoly
over foreign trade. The national companies and the gov
ernment ministries have been the exclusive importers of
foreign technology, and have been financed by resources
from oil revenues and by foreign loans and grants of
credit. Since 1973, the Ministry of Finance has permitted
its institutions (banks and state enterprises) to borrow
and carry out foreign loans. During the 1960s and 1970s,
however, these state enterprises accumulated enormous
debts, which were financed in large part by advances from
the treasury. By 1980, the national enterprises had
accumulated bank debts of almost $5 billion, and the
manufacturing sector alone accounted for almost $3 billion
of this debt.^
Foreign capital for financing Algerian enterprises
increased sharply during the four-year plans (1970-73 and
1974-77). According to many estimations, the amount of
external debts of the country increased from 35 percent
in 1971 to 60 percent in 1973.^ The 1973 balance of
payment was to be settled through new borrowed capital in
3 H. Elsenhans, "Some Contradictions in Algeria's Development Strategies," Maghreb Review, (May 1982), p. 64. 4 < / Tahar Benhouria, L'economie du developpement de 1 1Alqerie (Paris: Maspero, 1980), pp. 299-300.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 9 9
form of loans contracted by the national banks and state
enterprises. Borrowing foreign capital did not solve the
problem; rather, it elevated the permanent deficit, espe
cially in service goods.
After the first four-year plan, and due to the oil
price increase, Algerian oil revenue increased by DA 2.5
billion. This led to an increase of the budget for the
year 1974 by 9 billion DA. This of course helped the
state to reduce its foreign debts and to improve the
financial situation of the public sector by reimbursing
the Treasury and the Central Bank. But this recovery was
limited to a short period of time, as implied by the
announcement by M. Mahroug, Minister of Finance: "In
1975, the financial condition of our development is not
bad despite the world inflation that struck our economy.
It resulted in cutting down the relative advantage we 5 acquired in 1974 in terms of international exchange."
According to the World Bank report of the public debts of
developing countries, Algeria occupied the first place in
terms of loans received by all African countries.
Out of a total $14,466.6 million of loans received by the African countries, Algeria occupied the first place with $ 3,109.5 million before the other two big borrowers: Egypt ($1,746.1), and Zaire ($1,016.7). In over all debts, Algeria is also first with $ 4,788.9
5 M. Mahrouq, "Les grandes lignes du budget pour 1975", El-Moujahid (8 January 1975), p. 49.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 0
million out of a total. $ 21,774.7 million for all African countries.
In 1979, Algeria owed $245 million to international finan
cial institutions. In the same year, she owed communist
bloc countries $532 million, and Arab and African finan- 7 cial institutions $1.2 billion.
Algeria has been a high debtor during the past two
decades. However, it has recently pursued policies which
attempt to turn away from foreign aid and borrowing as a
means of financing technology transfer. Present Algerian
policies stress that the main sources of financing should
be exports of natural gas and crude oil, and then in
creased private investment as well as foreign joint ven
tures with the national companies. Since 1980, Algeria
has imposed restrictions on foreign borrowing. Sixty
percent of funds for investments for the present five year
plan are scheduled to be financed by the foreign exchange
earned from estimated annual revenues of $12 billion from
petroleum and natural gas.
In 1980, the Chadli government made it official
government policy that oil revenues must become an effec
tive source of accumulation for production and not just
for investment. One major effect of this decision was
6Banque Mondiale, Rapport Annuel (Washington D.C., 1975), p. 55. 7 OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, 1977-1980 (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1981), p. 23.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 1
another decision to practically shut off the demand by
state enterprises for international loans in 1980-82.
According to Benissad, an Algerian economist, "The
international solvency of Algeria resides in her present
revenues from the exportation of oil and in the immediate
future in the execution of contracts for the export of
O natural gas." As Algeria has stressed hydrocarbons
exports as the major source of foreign reserves, an impor
tant component of Algeria's financing policies has con
cerned the pricing of oil. Algeria has gained a reputa
tion by frequently demanding higher than agreed OPEC
prices per barrel of crude oil (in 1981, Algeria received
$40 per barrel; in 1982, after negotiations, she reduced
her price to $37.50 per barrel, while the OPEC price was
$34 per barrel). In spite of the reputation for higher
pricing, Algeria has usually succeeded in having all of
its oil lifted by its foreign purchasers without a prob
lem. This may be due to the high quality of its hydro
carbons, as we explained in Chapter V.
In early 1975, Algeria's high prices apparently led
to a shift of oil demand to the Gulf states, and Algeria's
government revenues fell. This motivated Algeria to
barter oil at full official prices in return for machinery
and transportation equipment from the purchase of oil, but
^M.E. Benissad, Economie du de'veloppement de 1 'Alqerie (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 252.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 2
this offer apparently was not picked up. By the end of
1975, the decision by OPEC to raise the price of oil by 10
percent led to an improved situation for Algeria. Because
of an impressive hydrocarbon production record, Algeria
will probably continue to enjoy relatively easy access to
international lending markets at favorable interest rates
throughout the present as well as the next decade. But it
must be noted here that this heavy dependence upon hydro
carbons exports means that, unless Algeria's capacity to
produce exports increases greatly in the next two decades
to replace the revenues currently earned by hydrocarbons,
it could have serious problems in financing future devel
opment .
Despite all this effort, total debt has remained
high: in 1980 the total estimated external debt was $17.5
billion, and the debt service was estimated at 25 percent
of imports. In 1982-83, Algeria had to pay $4 billion in 9 foreign debt service payments. It is estimated that
Algeria's current external debt, which stood at $13.5
billion at the end of 1982, had risen by the end of 1983
to over $15 billion; some estimates have put it at $17
billion. Between $800 million and $1.5 billion of this
was in short-term credits. Service debt has been rising
from about $3.8 billion in 1982 to between $3.9 billion
and 4.5 billion in 1983.
9 EIU, Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria (London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, No. 1, 1984), pp. 17-18.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 3
Algeria returned to the international capital market
in a major way in 1983. A $700 million Euroloan raised by
SONATRACH in June 1983,*^ followed by another loan
financed by Gulf International Bank, initially put at $500
million and then increased to $800 million, were concluded
by the Banque Exterieure d'Algerie (BEA) and the Banque
Nationale d'Algerie (BNA).^ In addition to the $700
million raised by SONATRACH, and the $800 million raised
by the two state banks in Dec 1983, a number of other
substantial loans brought the total borrowing for 1983 to
$2,183.44 million, ten times more than in 1982. This put
Algeria well ahead of other Middle Eastern borrowers, 12 followed next by Iraq with $1.6 billion. Much of this
borrowed amount ($2,183.44 million) was seen by interna
tional bankers as being essentially for balance of pay
ments support. In 1985, the Algerian Internal Bank has
obtained two loans totaling $700 million from French banks
(Banque Lyons de Credit, Banque Nationale de Paris, and
Banque de Societe Nationale). SONATRACH obtained a loan 13 of $33.5 million from a Japanese bank.
**Ibid., p.18. 12 EIU, Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria 2 (London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 1984), p. 14. 13 Asharq Al-Awsat, The International Arab Journal, May 22, 1985.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 4
A $128 million loan by the World Bank to finance a
major telecommunications development scheme was signed in
Algiers on Jan 1983 by the President of the World Bank,
A.W. Clausen, and the Algerian Finance Minister, Boualam
Benhamouda. The World Bank has now made 23 loans to
Algeria, amounting to $1,229 million overall, covering
projects in the fields of transport (roads, railways, and
ports), water supply, electrical energy, industry, agri- 14 culture, rural development, and education. In the next
few years the Bank's loans will continue to concentrate on
the development of the economic infrastructure. The Bank
is currently participating in the financing of the new
port at Jenjen near Jijel.
In recent years, Algeria has also come to rely on
Arab sources for an increasingly large amount of its
foreign borrowing needs. In 1983, the Jeddah-based Islamic
Development Bank provided a total of $106 million in loans
to finance imports of raw materials and intermediate
industrial goods. In 1984, it has already agreed to lend
a further $65 million for the same purposes and to put up
$10.8 million towards the financing of the Jenjen port.
In 1983, the Kuwait-based Arab Fund for Economic and
Social Development (AFESD) lent $120 million for various
projects, including the building of two hospitals at
Tiart, and an earthquake early warning system. In the
14 EIU, Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria 2, p. 13.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 5
same year it gave $41 million for the Jenjen project, and
an agreement has been reached on a $19 million loan to
Algeria's Banque de 1'Agriculture et du Developpement
Rural (BADR) for agriculture development projects.*^
According to AFESD officials, lending to Algeria is
expected to continue at about $20 million a year in 1985
and beyond. Substantial loans are also forthcoming from
the Saudi Fund for Development this year. In addition,
the Saudi government has put up $50.7 million towards the
Jenjen project; it is now lending $108.3 million to fin
ance the Ain Dalia Dam as well as the construction of a
railway link between M'sila and Bordj Bou Arreridj in
eastern Algeria. The Saudi government has recently grant
ed Algeria $143 million to finance in its entirety a
program of infrastructural projects at Ech-Chlef, formerly
El-Asnam, which was devastated by an earthquake in 1980.
As a result of this increased reliance on Arab sources,
Algeria and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are to set up
an investment bank. Agreement in principal was reached on
April 1984.16
This reflected Algeria's continuing heavy debt ser
vicing burden and reinforced the expectations of interna
tional banks that Algeria would return to the Euromarkets
and Arabic countries for further large loans in the course
15 EIU, Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria 3 (1984), p. 18.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 6
of 1984. Although the balance of payments is improving
only slowly, the overall balance of 1984 and 1985 is still
in deficit. The IMF figures that the Algerian debt has
increased and reached $4.8 billion by the end of 1984. In
1982, the World Bank estimated that Algeria must borrow an
average of $3 billion annually in order to be able to
carry out all its industrial projects. Most of this money
is needed to finance the liquefaction plants, the develop
ment of gas fields, and the construction of pipelines. It
now looks certain that Algeria will need to raise further
loans in the course of this year.
At this point, we can conclude that there are two
main sources through which technology transfer is being
financed in Algeria. The first source is hydrocarbons
sales. Approximately 98 percent of all foreign exchange
earnings come from oil and natural gas. The hydrocarbons
sector (oil and gas) realizes 40 percent of Algeria's GNP,
represents 96 percent of the country's exports, and con
tributes to state revenues by more than 50 percent. For
example, the hydrocarbons sector has financed 47.4 percent
of the total cost of imported technology during the period 17 1962-76. In the last year (1984), oil and gas revenues
were expected to total 57 billion AD ($11.6 billion), down
$1 billion from 1983, and were to account for 54 percent
1 7 ' Marches Tropicaux et Mediterraneens 1809 (Juillet 1980) : 3395.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 7
of government income compared with 59 percent in the year
1983. The government intends to reduce imports to 48
billion AD ($9.8 billion) in line with the reduced hydro
carbons revenues, a reduction of 2 billion AD on the 18 actual imports total for 1983.
The second source is foreign aid or loans, either
through international organizations such as the World Bank
and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), or through
government and private banks in Canada and European coun
tries, and through the U.S. Eximbank. Despite some fluc
tuations in the smoothness of relations between the
Algerian government and the U.S. Eximbank, Eximbank finan
cing has been the largest single source of capital for
financing a wide variety of technology imports to Algeria.
Canada is providing a major credit for Algerian purchases
of capital goods. A C$542.5 million credit for Algerian
purchases of Canadian capital goods and services was
signed in Ottawa on April 1984. Algeria is Canada's
biggest customer in both Africa and the Middle East and
her eleventh most important trading partner worldwide.
Total Canadian sales to Algeria were C$380 million in 1981
and now reportedly stand at C$470 million a year. The
latest arrangement, comprising a principal credit of C$500
million and a complementary credit of C$42.5 million, is
18 EIU, Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria 1, p.10.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 8
to be drawn on over the next two years and is expected to
be used mainly for purchases of machinery.
Conclusion
Financing the process of industrialization in Algeria
is dependent and will become increasingly dependent on the
international financing market. The tendency of preceding
years was marked by shifting the direction of dependency
from Europe in general to the United States and Arab oil
countries. This dependency is explained by the augmenta
tion of loans Algeria obtains every year. Financing the
industrialization through foreign banking loans and credit
implies the integration of the Algerian economy into the
international system which is dominated by the capitalist
production and the imperialist interests of the interna
tional monopolists. This leads to the confirmation of our
research questions, that is, the thesis of the study that
there is indeed a contradiction between establishing
socialism and the participation of foreign capital in
financing development. Dependent development is unavoid
able if industrialization occurs under foreign capital.
Foreign Skilled-Labor Dependency
If the question of financing is of major concern for
Algeria as a capital-short country, so is the question of
foreign skilled manpower. This section will assess to
what extent Algeria is dependent on foreign skilled and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 0 9
professional labor, as well as to discuss educational and
training policies associated with technology transfer.
Some argue that the presence of foreign workers in a
developing nation is undesirable because it signifies
ongoing dependence on foreigners and may lead to political
and social unrest at home. Others argue that foreign
workers make an important economic contribution, and that
their presence is generally beneficial to the host nation.
A third view sees that since no nation can be completely
self-sufficient, the challenge is to utilize foreign
workers effectively, based on a realistic understanding of
both the problems which can arise and the potential con
tribution they can make. Although Algeria is different
from the Middle Eastern nations, particularly the
labor-short Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait
that have promoted policies to utilize foreign workers,
the Algerian economy suffers only from a shortage of
highly qualified and professional indigenous workers. The
question of foreign qualified workers, which is part of
the larger issue of dependence on foreign suppliers, is
still facing Algeria.
After independence, Algeria was faced with a lack of
skilled and trained workers. With the option of an indus
trial model, the needs for skilled and trained cadres
became enormous. Table 66 indicates the availability and
the scarcity of trained cadres in 1963.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 310
TABLE 66
AVAILABILITY AND SCARCITY OF CADRES IN 1963
Available Deficit
Directors of industrial enterprises 1,500 5,000 Higher staff and intellectuals 1,300 15.000 Technicians & heads of non-agriculture 8,400 35,500 Professional workers 39,500 45.000
SOURCE: Andre Tiano, La dialectique de dependance (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1977), p. 75.
During 1966-1967, while the national economy was
dependent on 7000 foreign professional contractors, the
economy suffered from a deficit of 2500 persons at the
qualified upper level. At the qualified middle level,
where 20,000 of foreign contractors were active, the
deficit was 11,000 persons. During the three-year plan
(1967-69), the deficit at the qualified upper level was
7000 and at the qualified middle level 11,000 persons. The
population of the foreign labor force was 15,000 of higher
cadres and 10,000 of middle cadres. Industry alone,
excluding agriculture and service sectors, required 3000
persons of higher cadres. The need for higher cadres for
the metallurgical, metallic, mechanic and electric indus
tries increased from 541 persons in 1965 to 3,180 person
in 1973 (48% increase) . The need in the hydrocarbon
sector increased from 290 persons to 802 persons, and the
needs of the consumer industries (leather, textiles,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 1
alimentary) increased from 580 to 1,014 persons for the
same period.
In 1977, according to the Ministry of Industry, only
25 percent of the projects were executed under the author
ity of Algerian engineers, architects and technicians; 50
percent in the metallurgical industries; and 25 percent in
the construction industries. In 1979, 75 percent of
construction projects were entirely on turnkey-based
contracts, and 20 percent were achieved by foreign engin
eers. As regards the critical industries such as oil, all
projects were entrusted to the foreign engineering compa
nies which assumed the general responsibility for the
execution, namely French companies (ENSA, Technip, KREBS,
SOCEA); British (CJB); Japanese (Japan-Gasoline, Mitsui) ;
and Italian (SNAM, Progetti).
In 1977, the total of newly trained engineers and
qualified cadres in the applied science and economy was
under 1700. In addition, the deficit within the higher
cadres had tripled in five years, and the deficit in
middle cadres could not be reduced. If we consider the
availability of upper and middle cadres as an indication
for potential economic independence, the future does not
hold any significant improvement from the present situa
tion. The causes behind this situation lay in the system
of education as it related to economic development.
19 / H . Temmar, Structures et modele de developpement de l'economie de l'Alqerie (Alger: SNED, 1974), p. 252.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 2
Educational and Training System
Education and training are presented in Algerian
political literature as the third dimension of an indus
trial, agrarian, and cultural revolution. In reality, we
propose, education and training must be considered as
pre-conditions for independent economic development and
technology. Despite constant political attention devoted
to education, the reform policy of the university (1970),
and the progressive restructuring of the elementary and
high school educational system (1975), the Algerian gov
ernment has not been capable of directing the system of
education so that it would respond to the economic devel
opment demands.
Despite a significant increase in the budget of
education in the five-year plan by 10 percent of the total
investment, and a sharp increase in student enrollment,
the Algerian universities could not meet all the needs of
industry. The government began establishing several new
technological institutions adopted to Algerian needs with
the cooperation of American and European industrial firms.
These institutions were created in response to the urgent
need of the national companies for expertise and skilled
manpower. Training at all levels of the Algerian person
nel required for the proper operation of the plants became
a very important element in every contract that Algeria
carried out with foreign firms. In addition, students are
being trained abroad in increasing numbers.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 3
Besides the national educational system, at the level
of higher education, the Planning Ministry supervises an
"Institut de technologie de la planification et d'economie
appliquee" with a capacity for 500 students, and a "Centre
de formation de techniciens" with a capacity for 600
students. The Ministry of Finance controls an "Institut de
technologie des finances et de la comptabilite." The
Ministry of Work and Social Affairs runs, in turn, a
network of professional schools with a capacity for 15,000
students. The Ministry of Commerce directs an "Institut
de technologie du commerce." In addition, a system of
training and forming professional technicians has been
progressively put into operation by the Ministries of
Industry (light industry, heavy industry, energy and
petrochemical industry), and the national companies. The
latter presently run a system of technical training com
prised of 300 establishments with a capacity for 800
students; and a higher institute of management, INPED
(Institut National de Productivite et du Developpement).
The Ministry of Work and Social Affairs runs, in turn, a
network of professional schools with a capacity of 15,000
students.
Tables 67 and 68 present the real situation in 1978
concerning the upper and middle cadres, with comparison to
the estimated needs. The two levels of technicians and
managers are considered of primary importance. Referring
to Tables 67 and 68, the deficit of 41 percent at the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 4
higher level and 42 percent at the middle level, for
manufacturing industries, shows that a process of accumu
lation for technological innovation cannot take place in
the near future.
TABLE 67
DEFICIT OF QUALIFIED UPPER LEVEL CADRES IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR (Units)
Real number Estimated of Estimated needs staff needs in in in Variation 1978 post Deficit % 1985 78/85
Petroleum and gas 5,300 3,000 -2,300 44 7,500 +2,200 Manufacturing industries 10,250 6,000 -4,250 41 21,000 +10,750 Goods for construction 650 500 -150 23 1,800 +1200 Electricity 400 350 -50 12 800 +400 Total 16,600 9,850 -6,750 41 31,100 +14,550
SOURCE: H. Temmar, Strategie de developpement indepen- dant: le cas de l'Algerie (Paris: Editions Publisud, 1983) , p. 196.
Taking the figures of 1977, with an annual growth of
2 percent, the total number of engineering and other
students preparing for a technical and economic diploma
within the period of 1978-1985, is about 13,000. In
reference to Table 67, we can establish the following
observations:
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 5
TA B LE 6 8
DEFICIT OF QUALIFIED MIDDLE LEVEL CADRES IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR (Units)
Actual Number of Estimated Qualified Percent Needs Workers Deficit
Petroleum 35,000 7,100 20 Manufacturing industries 42,000 17,700 42 Goods for construction 2,200 1,300 59
SOURCE: H. Temmar, Strategie de developpement indepen- dant: le cas de l'Algerie (Paris: Editions Publisud, 1983) , p. 197.
1. The total number of qualified upper cadres avail
able in 1985 is 13,000 + 9,850 = 22,850, compared with the
estimated need of 31,100 (Table 67, column 5). The
deficit of 1985 is, therefore, 8,250, or 27 percent
2. The growth of the total need for upper cadres be
tween 1978 and 1985 is 14,550 (Table 67, column 6), com
pared with the total available of 13,000. The deficit
will be 1,550, or 12 percent
It seems that despite the great efforts devoted to
training and education, the system seems unable to reach
the stage of innovation in the near future. In fact, the
established system is unable to satisfy the actual needs
of the industrial sector in terms of qualified managers
and skilled workers.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 6
It is for this reason that Algeria is presently in
the process of restructuring its entire educational sys
tem. The Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific
Research was founded in 1970, and since then, the number
of institutes of higher learning has expanded rapidly. In
1978/79 there were 10 universities in Algeria, with a
total enrollment of over 51,000 students, and the plan
announced in 1980 called for 18 more to be built to accom- 20 modate an additional 54-72,000 students. This new
system began, in 1975, with heavy emphasis being placed on
vocational and technical education. One major reform is
the replacement of the existing primary and middle school
structure with a technical education of nine years,
consisting of three-year cycles; at the end of the second
cycle, those with a technical orientation are channelled
into pre-professional training schools. Those who com
plete the third cycle, and remain in the formal educa
tional system, may go on to an academic secondary school,
specialized technical school or professional training
school.
By the 1978-79 academic year, Algeria had 22 techni
cal schools, with close to 12,000 students enrolled in
them and over 1000 teachers. The 1980-84 plan allocated
approximately $11,000 million for training and education,
20 Middle East and North Africa (London: Europa Publi cations, 1982-83), pp. 277, 285.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 7
with close to $76 million for building professional cen
ters, and additional funds for building and equipping 268
training institutes and 300 vocational education centers.
Foreign assistance in expanding training and vocational
educational centers and providing the necessary personnel
and equipment is also being utilized.
Several vocational training centers are currently
being built by Belgian and USSR contractors. A World Bank
loan of $87 million to assist in the construction of three
maintenance training schools, three industrial training
schools, and an institute for training maintenance trade
instructors is being considered, which would also provide
fellowships to train Algerians abroad.
In addition to technical institutes, professional
schools and vocational centers, Algeria has emphasized
developing technological institutes, conceived in 1964 as
a solution to the shortage of qualified middle level and
senior technicians caused by the departure of the French
in 1962. These technological institutes are intended to
attract those who have never had access to formal educa
tion, as well as drop-outs or failures from the tradi
tional educational system. For example, the INELEC (the
Institut National d'Electricite et d'Electronique) was
established with the cooperation of American universities
and industrial firms in March 1976 to serve as an insti
tute for training Algerians in electrical engineering and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 8
electronics. The American contractor, Education Develop
ment Centre (EDC), had the responsibility of recruiting
professors and training Algerian teaching staff; in 1978,
there were 300 students enrolled.
Educational and Training Policies
Despite the efforts made by Algeria to emphasize the
importance of "indigenizing" technology development, in
gaining not only technology products but the expertise to
properly operate, manage, maintain advanced technology,
and sustain technological development, the policy of
training local labor in Algeria has demanded at least
temporary reliance upon foreign personnel in each of these
efforts to transfer necessary skills.
The policy of Algeria views a trade-off between the
desire for rapid economic development and the aim of
indigenizing the labor force, which will shape that devel
opment in the future. Here the key policy issue has been
one of emigration of indigenous skilled personnel to other
countries, and better utilization of trained manpower at
home. The policy of Algeria has been directed toward two
goals: upgrading the quality of the indigenous labor
force in order that it may substitute for imported skilled
workers, and controlling the size and composition of the
foreign labor force, considered necessary for technology
transfer and economic development.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 1 9
Naturally, policies oriented toward education and
training of the indigenous labor force have an impact at
the project level and on society at large. The former
includes laws and regulations which require companies and
government to train indigenous personnel in various areas
of project operation and maintenance. The latter includes
policies designed to expand education and training —
particularly vocational and technical training — at home,
and encouraging indigenous students to study abroad. At
the project level, in 1963, a governmental decree was
issued to oblige all state and private companies that
employ more than 100 workers to create centers and estab
lish a general training program. Algeria has established
regulations which require foreign companies to train
indigenous workers, so most of the contracts with foreign
firms include an arrangement for professional training
programs. Although regulations governing foreign partici
pation have not yet been developed in Algeria, the country
has begun to move toward a stricter foreign employment
policy.
Despite the emphasis placed on indigenous training in
Algeria, there is little direct control, and policies are
so far not well-defined. Policies governing foreign
employment are just now being shaped, as the number of
foreign personnel in Algeria has grown rapidly. The
importation of foreign personnel to operate and construct
new facilities and plants has been growing in Algeria, and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 0
concern has grown that this has been at the expense of
developing indigenous expertise. While this would be
difficult to assess, by 1978, more than 86,000 foreign
technicians were employed in Algeria. 21
New forms of contracts in Algeria have also empha
sized shifting the responsibility of training to a foreign
contractor, but so far the terms for doing so have varied
from contract to contract. Algeria is only beginning to
articulate specific policies in this regard, but most
observers in Algeria feel that the issue of training
Algerians in the maintenance of plant and equipment is
crucial.
The 1980-84 plan indicates Algeria's intention of
using alternative methods of reducing its dependence on
foreign skilled labor. The plan provides for a national
program to encourage on-site training. The government
also intends to enforce more technology transfer require
ments in contracts, such as requiring the contractors to
train local staff to run the plants that they establish.
This is a relatively new aspect of contracts that has
developed out of a dissatisfaction with turnkey contracts,
wherein plant and equipment have been provided without the
expertise to operate them. For example, in the Societe
Nationale de Siderurgie (the Algerian Steel Company),
21 J. Minces, L'Alqerie de Boumediene (Paris: Presses de la Cite, 1978), p. 50.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 1
Algerians operating the steel mill will be replaced tempo
rarily by Japanese production workers, with the hope that
Algerian workers will learn by observing the correct
methods of operating the mill.
On a broader level, as the critical role of foreign
workers has become a more important policy issue in
Algeria, so has the issue of expanding education and
training more broadly. This has been evident in the last
few years. In light of rapid technological change,
Algeria has been placing increasing emphasis on vocational
and technical training to allow the indigenous population
to assume the main role in developing its own society.
The main components of this policy have been twofold: to
expand the system of technical training at home, often
with foreign assistance and, in the temporary absence of
indigenous technical training, to send students abroad
under government-sponsored programs. In short, the scope
of policies to train local personnel is extensive, ranging
from regulations of project training to expansion of
general vocational and technical training for indigenous
cadres, both at home and abroad.
Despite these efforts, however, a number of problems
have been associated with this policy. First, in Algeria,
most of the indigenous labor force is concentrated in the
government or in service sectors of the economy, with
relatively small proportions entering the scientific and
technical fields. This has been due mainly to two
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 2
factors: (1) a lack of wage and other salary incentives
to enter the more technical fields; and (2) an attempt to
avoid many kinds of industrial manual labor, which has
extended to many of the technical fields, even in the
light of the growth of technical institutions. This
question of inadequate incentives to attract the indige
nous population to more technical sectors has affected the
distribution of trained personnel once they have graduat
ed. The first problem which stands out is the question of
providing incentives for indigenous personnel to enter
these technical institutes and fields, and matching train
ing with manpower needs. Algeria should realize that none
of these programs can be successful unless there are
incentives for the local populations to participate.
These might include monetary incentives, such as offering
higher scholarships for technical study or higher wages in
technical fields; smoother job placement through links
between technical institutions and universities and places
of employment; and better efficiency in job placement
programs overall.
The second problem, associated with students studying
abroad, is the fact that many students choose not to
return home. In 1977, for example, 1,000 Algerian stu
dents had been sent abroad to the United States and else
where to be trained in gas and petroleum technology and
civil engineering. Although most of these trainees were
obliged by the Algerian government to return home after
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 3
their period of study, it was estimated that 70 percent of 22 them never returned to Algeria.
The third problem is the question of migration. Even
though Algeria seems to have a better potential of skilled
manpower, due to emigration, skilled technical and profes
sional labor, nonetheless, is in short supply. Emigration
of indigenous manpower has often meant a loss of highly
skilled personnel, and has therefore often caused severe
manpower shortages in certain sectors and occupations at
home. In Algeria, there has been increasingly more debate
on the issue of migration, but few policies have been
explicitly formulated. The out-flow of migrants has been
almost as large, mainly in the direction of France.
Algeria's traditional policy of preferential treatment for
capital intensive high-technology industries resulted in
structural unemployment and underemployment. During the
latter part of the 1970s-1980s, upwards of 30,000 skilled
and unskilled Algerian workers have been leaving Algeria
each year in hopes of finding employment in France. While
this has become a worry for Algerian planners, no over
arching policy has as yet been articulated. Reducing the
number of foreign skilled labor will remain a long-term
challenge.
22 OTA, Manpower and Training in Algeria (Washington D.C. , OTA, 1982) , p. 10.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 4
The fourth and last problem associated with this
policy is related to controlling the foreign labor force
associated with technology transfer. Although foreign
manpower is in demand, too much foreign labor is viewed as
a negative phenomenon both economically and politically.
The impact of worker migration has been especially criti
cal in Algeria, where the costs of losing skilled labor
for the domestic economy must be balanced by importing
foreign skilled labor.
Conclusion
Despite these efforts, many problems remain, and
these policies will continue to demand revision and re-
evaluation in the years ahead. Ultimately, we can make
three main general remarks:
1. The Algerian educational system must be recon
structed on the basis of efficiency and openness toward
the world economy. The call for establishing technologi
cal institutes is the first step toward reconsidering the
system of education
2. The scarcity of higher cadres brings another
consequence. The qualified middle cadres will assume the
higher responsibilities without adequate qualifications.
This situation has resulted in a reduction in the quality
and efficiency of production and in the low level of
innovation
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 5
3. Incentives are essential for indigenous personnel
to enter technical institutes, for the success of educa
tional programs, and for the participation of local
skilled manpower
Algerian Socialism
The concept of "socialism" became a common reference
in the Algerian literature only during the armed struggle
against French colonialism. The first document to intro
duce the concept of "socialism" was the Tripoli program
that was adopted by the National Revolutionary Council in
June 1962. This program proposed that the peasants and
the working class form the active base of the revolution
and the ones who give the revolution its popular charac
ter. The organization of the political power and the
economic strategy must be established for the benefits of
these social classes.
According to this program, the tasks of the Algerian
democratic revolution are immense. These tasks cannot be
accomplished simply by one social class, regardless of its
degree of engagement. It is only the people who can
accomplish them efficiently. The meaning given to the
concept "people" here is synonymous to that of "working
classes." "People" was used as a multi-dimensional con
cept at the time of independence:
1. To help mobilize the Algerian people and secure
the direction of the FLN after independence
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 6
2. To assist the country in the working of large
units of production abandoned by French owners, and to
protect the Algerian firms from the destruction by the OAS
(Organisation de l'Armee Secrete)
3. To help bring to political power those who are
totally devoted to socialist ideas
According to the National Charter of 1976, the term
"socialism” was defined as "a theoretical aim and strategy
that takes into account the reality of each people and
implies the rejection of all dogmatism...and the rejection 23 of exploitation of man by man." In this view, socialism
becomes a rational, pragmatic tool for development and
justice. It is more of a device than an ideology.
This general and imprecise definition of "socialism"
had served to justify socio-political choices. It became
a reference for justifying:
1. The establishment of autogestion as a more demo
cratic social organization (1963-1965)
2. The static and centralized institutional model of
organization (1965-1967)
3. The establishment of socialist forms of auto
gestion at the state enterprise level (1977)
At the Tripoli conference, the FLN confirmed that the
popular democratic revolution is the identity of the
23 * Front de liberation nationale. Projet de charte nationale (Alger: El-Moudjahid, 1976), p. 4.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 7
country. In order for the development of Algeria to be
rapid, harmonious, and oriented toward the satisfaction of
people's needs, it must be put within a socialist frame
work. In the following years after independence, the new
constitution made the notions of "democratic socialism"
and the "struggle against the exploitation of man by man"
the main principles of the new Algerian democratic and
popular republic.
Generally speaking, Algerian socialism has two essen
tial characters. First, it is a national socialism,
inseparable from the struggle of national liberation.
Accordingly, for every revolution to be socialist it must
first be nationalist. The Algerian nationalists distrust
foreign models. The importation of foreign socialism is
condemned and considered anti-nationalist, because the
adoption of any foreign concept of socialism will contra
dict the socio-cultural traditions of the country. This
is especially true in Algeria, which is strongly attached
to the traditional values of the Arab world. With respect
to anti-imperialism, Algerian socialism was presented as
an example for the Third World nations that struggled
against all forms of neo-colonialism and fought for the
establishment of a new international economic order which
would respect the aspiration and interests of the develop
ing countries.
Second, it is a pragmatic socialism. According to
the Charter, Algerian socialism is a practical one rather
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 8
than an ideology, a doctrine of action and not an
intellectual speculation. Therefore, socialism was seen as
a means of transforming the socio-economic conditions of
the Algerian population.
After the coup d'etat that brought Boumediene to
power in June 1965, the Revolutionary Council decided to
adopt a trend of socialism that conformed with the reality
of the country. Boumediene noted that "it is the Algerian
people...who have chosen socialism, and it is the Algerian
conditions that imposed socialism as the best way for the 24 future." This political choice was emphasized later in
the National Charter of 1976 in which the principles of
Algerian socialism were defined.
Overall, the regime of Boumediene has introduced the
three major modern ideologies: nationalism, socialism,
and democracy. It stated as its goal the creation of a
society that would be industrial, socialist, democratic,
productive and egalitarian. However, the gaps between the
statements of goals and on-the-ground performance have
been many, substantial, and increasingly apparent. These
gaps have led observers to criticize Algerian economic
development policies, and to dismiss Algerian pretensions
to democratic and socialist status.
24 H. Boumediene, cited in A. Bennamane, The Algerian Development Strategy and Employment Policy, 1980, p. 65.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 2 9
For example, until 1974, the realization of Algerian
socialism was still partial and limited. Boumediene's
regime did not, in the name of the unity of the Algerian
people, reject completely the emergence of a bourgeoisie
at the national level. He admitted in October 1974 that
"Algeria is not yet a socialist country." The ideology
remained vague to the extent that everybody could find in
it what they were looking for. The rationality of techno
crats was promoted, the control of the petty bourgeoisie
and bureaucrats was increased, and the Arabic traditions
had to be respected. It appears that Boumediene took a
reformist position and socialism was understood simply as
a means of non-capitalist development.
Left-oriented analysts have classified the Boumediene
era as an example of petty bourgeois dominance (Lazreg's
book was based on this view). The left has argued that a
coalition of military officers, senior bureaucrats, and
petty bourgeois political leaders inherited political
power. While not owners, they have become controllers and
regulators of the means of production. The state control
is justified because they claim that their aims are to
promote socio-economic development in the public interest.
In reality, the coalition has produced a system of state
capitalism in- which its members are the major benefici
aries .
After the death of President Boumediene in December
1978, although socialism remained a component of the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 0
Algerian ideology, it was evident that the concept had to
be redefined. The debate on socio-economic questions
required an ideal socialism that rejected (1) the authori
tarian government exercised by bureaucratic entities such
as the party and administrative directors, (2) the dicta
torship of bureaucracy, and (3) poverty. However, the
socio-economic and political tendency under the Bendjadid
regime has pointed in the other direction. The question
to be addressed should not be the classical one: Is
Algeria a country well embarked on a transition to social
ism, or is it a socialist country? The evidence offered
to support this claim, which consists of the nationaliza
tion of most foreign firms, the introduction of central
ized planning and non-market pricing mechanisms, the
popular assemblies installed at the communal and provin
cial levels, the workers' participation scheme placed in
state-controlled industries, and the agrarian reform
movement, have not been supported by any concretely so
cialist actions. In theory, this perspective, which
distinguishes the Algerian socialist organization from
Western capitalist systems, seems superior, but the super
iority of the Algerian approach is asserted rather than
demonstrated. Since the gaps between Algerian participa
tory theory and elite-dominated reality are so obvious,
the Algerian people have no role in participating in
decision making. The principle of participation has not
been applied, and the bureaucrats will not allow the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 1
"laboring masses" to control the bulk of the affairs of
state. Why are the Algerian working classes not yet ready
to assume this control? The general response is that
their natural development was hindered by capitalist
colonialism during the French occupation and by the petty
bourgeoisie and bureaucrats after independence. Implemen
tation of participatory programs and more equitable dis
tribution of the social product might shift power to the
emerging proletariat. But it is in the interest of the
ruling coalition to prevent this kind of change. Its goal
is to maintain the present intermediary situation.
The question that therefore should be answered here
is: Is Algeria state-capitalist, or is it moving toward
the final stage of a capitalist social formation? The
Algerian state, by means of centralized resource alloca
tions and fixed prices, and the marketing of most major
and industrial commodities, is state-capitalist. In fact,
90 percent of all Algerian industry is state owned and
operated. However, the Algerian private sector is now
growing under the Bendjadid regime. The extent of
Algeria's involvement with the western capitalist system
permits us to view Algeria as being on the road to submis
sive integration into the capitalist world economy. There
are some signs which indicate that the Bendjadid regime is
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 2
indeed moving in a more liberal, market-oriented direc
tion. All sections of the left agree that the continua-
tion of the present situation will not and cannot lead to
the creation of anything resembling a socialist society.
Deviation from Socialist Theory
The first deviation is the retention of private
property. According to the Charter, in order for a soci
ety to be socialist, it must "abolish private ownership of
the means of production and...declare the end of exploita- 25 tion of man by man." However, the private sector has
continued to exist in Algeria. The Charter warns: "It is
clear that the maintenance, in industry, construction,
tourism, etc., of a private sector will always constitute 2 6 a potential risk for the resurgence of capitalism." The
Charter also states that "it is a matter of leaving to
private initiative the possibility of acting in a socially
useful sense, and of allowing private entrepreneurs to
receive a reasonable and satisfactory remuneration for 27 their activities."
The second deviation is that, in Algeria, socialism
can be created without the divisive conflict of class
struggle. This concept is said to apply only on the
25 Proget de Charte, p. 6. 26t, . , Ibid.
27Ibid., p. 22.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 3
international level; Algeria and other third world coun
tries are, as proletarian states, struggling against the
bourgeoisie and the industrialized west. Therefore,
internally the concept cannot be applied:
1. Because of the circumstances of settler colo
nialism, which prevented the growth of either an Algerian
national bourgeoisie or an Algerian working class
2. Because of the persistent historical need to
maintain trans-class unity in the war of liberation
3. Because the existing classes-who are indispen
sable for economic production-are nationalist and thus
make divisive class struggle simply unnecessary
Algerian socialism turns out to be socialism without
historical materialism, socialism without class struggle
and, in the final analysis, socialism without Marx.
The third deviation concerns the question of partici
pation in decision-making, either economically at the
level of socialist management or politically at the level
of political organizations. Economically, a worker said,
"You tell me, the people should be in control. How am I,
a worker, going to control our director general? I have
never laid eyes on him; I don't even know what he looks 2 8 like." Another worker said, "The idea [popular control]
28 El-Moudjahid (National Daily Newspaper), Mav 13. 1976, p. 4.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 4
is good, but experience shows us that sanctions are gener
ally limited to minor bureaucrats who serve very often as
scapegoats. Those truly responsible manage to get out of 29 the situation and preserve their interests." In mid-May
1976, a meeting of the national commission on socialist
management was called to discuss the implications of the
Charter for the development of socialist management. The
vice-president of the commission stated, "It is neces
sary... to ban the term participation, because the workers
are not participating in power, but rather are confused by 30 it." Politically, between 1965-71, the building up of
the state structures was accompanied by the neglect of the
institution of popular participation in political affairs.
The party, the union movement, the student organization,
the self-managed farms and industrial units, the national
assembly, none of these had been participatory either in
the Ben Bella or in the Boumediene regimes. It seems that
no substantive change has taken place at the micro-level:
on the workshop floor, in cooperatives, and economic
enterprises; nor in popular assemblies, or party cells.
The fourth and last deviation is the unavoidable
linkage with the world capitalist system. For example,
the aim of the first official visit by any Algerian leader
to Washington since the country became independent 23
29 El-Moudjahid, May 12, 1976, p. 7. 30 El-Moudjahid, May 18, 1976, p. 3.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 5
years ago was to enhance relations with the United States
and to discuss the possibility of Algeria's purchasing
U.S. arms. According to the Algerian Ambassador, Mohammed
Sahnoun, Algeria was interested in purchasing U.S. weapons
to reduce its dependency on its longtime main arms suppli
er, the Soviet Union. In the past, Algeria has been
accused of excessive military dependence on Soviet bloc
countries. Since its eight-year struggle for independence
against France, Algeria has acquired 80 to 90 percent of
its arms from the Soviet bloc, although some recent pur
chases have been made from France, West Germany, and Brit
ain. According to the Washington Post, the number of
Soviet military advisers attached to the Algerian armed
forces has dropped from a high of around 3,000 to about
1,200. Bendjadid admitted that the reduction in Soviet
military personnel is expected to continue as Algeria 31 masters foreign weapons systems. Bendjadid's visit to
Washington is the logical outcome of Algeria's gradual
shift from revolutionary positions both at home and
abroad. It is also the strongest evidence to date of the
changing Algerian foreign policy under his leadership
since 1979. One can say that the Algerian president's
visit to the United States is a symbolic milestone in the
country's gradual transition from a revolutionary transi
tional-socialist state to a nation seeking to associate
31 The Washington Post, April 14, 1985, p. A-30.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 6
its primary interests with the capitalist bloc. It is the
most visible illustration of Algeria's shift under his
seven years of leadership toward closer relations with the
West in general and the United States in particular.
Conclusion
Since 1962, three different Algerian regimes have
consistently claimed as their main goal the construction
of a socialist system. Even those who have admitted
Algeria's pretensions to be of socialist or in-transition-
to-socialist status would still classify the Algerian
approach as interventionist or, in the apt French term,
"dirigiste." Due to the growth in size and power of the
bourgeoisie and bureaucratic strata in Algerian society,
the shortcomings of participation mechanisms at all
levels, and the unavoidable linkages with the world capi
talist system created by Algeria's export-oriented indus
trial ambitions, the present study confirms the hypothesis
that the bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie have become the
dominant class in Algerian society, and that it is this
factor which accounts, ultimately, for the performance of
Algerian economic development and industrialization. This
research confirms the main thesis of the study that
throughout the actual process of industrialization,
Algeria is experiencing dependent capitalist economic
development.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER X
OBSTACLES TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN ALGERIA
In this chapter we will identify briefly the funda
mental problems that Algeria inherited from French colo
nialism. We will also identify the major obstacles to
economic development in Algeria, knowing that most of
these obstacles have been created by the process of indus
trialization and economic development itself throughout
the course of application.
As a consequence of the departure of most Europeans,
Algeria was left in the post-independence era with major
problems. For example, insufficient industrial planning,
management, and technical experience; an inadequacy of
local skilled labor; absence of equipment and capital; a
high rate of unemployment; and a domestic market composed
largely of an impoverished rural peasantry and urban
proletariat. After independence, the country decided to
carry out a policy of rapid development based on hydro
carbons and heavy industrialization in order to overcome
these problems. However, despite the efforts of develop
ment during the twenty-two years, Algeria is still facing
some major obstacles to its economic development and
337
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 8
industrialization. These obstacles can be summarized as
follows.
Population Growth
The massive increase of the population (3.3%) imposes
massive social obstacles to economic development, with
tremendous effects upon education, housing, medicine, and
employment. Although the government is mobilizing an
alternative strategy to limit overcrowding, by educating
households that their quality of life would improve with
fewer children, demographic pressures continue to put
intolerable stress on the existing infrastructure. In the
longer term, the World Bank's World Development Report for
1984 projects a population of 39 million by the year 2000
at current fertility and mortality rates.
Migration
Since 1967, Algeria has witnessed a rapid internal
migration from the rural to the urban areas, from the
countryside to the cities. Movement of the rural popula
tion into urban areas is a result of the process of indus
trialization taking place in Algeria now. In addition,
stagnation of the traditional agricultural sector has
aggravated the situation. The expected flow of young
people 14-19 years old seeking further training and em
ployment will also constitute an important social problem
for the future of economic development. The movement of
Algerian skilled and professional manpower from the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 3 9
country to abroad, especially France, has also been
conceived as a major obstacle facing the economic develop
ment of the country.* New policies aimed at limiting
participation of foreign workers and loss of indigenous
skilled workers through immigration should be established.
Land and Climate Constraints
These obstacles to economic development can be seen
in terms of cultivable land and the availability of water.
The agricultural land in Algeria is characterized by low
rainfall. The scarcity of agricultural land relative to
rural population (7 hectares of cultivable land per rural
person) is another obstacle, although we believe that this
situation was aggravated by the industrialization policy
that led to the transfer of thousands of hectares of
cultivable land into industrial zones. In addition,
Algerian agriculture has inherited from the colonial
agricultural structure a dualism which continues to exist
during independence: a sector oriented toward the market,
utilizing new technology and modern methods of exploita
tion, coexists with a sector of subsistence utilizing the
traditional methods. In the traditional sector, the lack
of water resources, the absence of fertilizers and the use
of traditional methods and equipment constitute the key
characteristics of this sector.
^Stephen Adler, International Migration and Depen dence (London: Gower Publishing Company, 1981), pp. 72-85.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 0
Secondly, as in the case of many rapidly developing
countries, Algeria has a growing water resource problem.
This is partly due to increasing domestic demands for
fresh water, and partly to the competing needs of the new
industries and agriculture which still accounts for 80
percent of total water consumption. As a result of delays
in implementing projects since the introduction of the
first four-year plan (1970), extreme shortages of water
have built up in all economic sectors. Shortage of water
supply remains one of the main obstacles to the economic
development in Algeria.
In order to make effective use of the country's
agricultural potential, future development must take into
account the development of water resources and irrigation,
the abolition of agricultural dualism, the protection of
cultivable land, and the proper exploitation of the three
main usable land areas of the country: the steppes (les
hauts plateaux), the high plains, and the tell (the coast
al region: Chelif, Mitidja, and Annaba plains).
Mismanagement and Organization
Inadequate management and organizational structure is
another obstacle to economic development in Algeria.
Despite the special attention given to the problem of
management by the government under the Boumediene regime,
Algerian management is still characterized by unorganized
and inefficient decision-making. Boumediene himself
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 341
admitted this fact in a 1977 speech: "In truth, the
problem of the management of the economy, and more partic
ularly, of production and service units, will constitute
our major concern for the coming years.... This will be 2 the priority task of the government."
Confusion of authority or legitimate control in
different social and economic apparatuses constitutes a
situation characterized, in general, by inadequate and
unorganized management, resulting in delays of salary
payments, big account deficits, poor commercialization,
unreliable financial transactions, an inefficient methods
of communicating information, near-total absence of coor
dination, and unavailability of spare parts. This situa
tion, of course, has led to a very low level of productiv
ity and poor quality. Management inefficiency resulted in
a tremendous delay in industrial plants. Besides the
population growth, migration, land, and climate obstacles,
the managerial and organizational structure imposes anoth
er obstacle in the way of Algerian economic growth.
Changes for more efficient and organized management, a
profitable public sector, proper professional training, a
well organized financial system, and clear work procedures
are urgently needed.
2 El-Moudjahid (National Daily Newspaper), March 21, 1977, p. 4.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 2
Underutilization of Technology
The adoption of the model of "industrializing indus
tries" of economic development and the intensive importa
tion of foreign technology brings about the phenomenon of
underutilization of technology. In addition, the intro
duction of foreign technology has contributed to the
maintenance of domination and subordination relationships
in the workplace.
Making existing industrial capacities profitable is
still a critical problem. In the case of Algeria, the
experience shows that technology is not fully utilized.
The main reasons for underutilization of foreign imported
technology are the lack of industrial experience, the
delays in establishing the necessary supporting infra
structure, and the shortage of technical and managerial
personnel and skilled manpower.
Skilled Manpower
With the independence of the country, Algeria found
itself in a big shortage of trained cadres. With the
adoption of the "industrializing industries" model of
development, the needs for skilled manpower became enor
mous (see Tables 66, 67 and 68).
The country's lack of skilled manpower is still one
of the major obstacles to the Algerian economy. This need
is being addressed, in part, by sending large numbers of
Algerians overseas for training, and, in part, by asking
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 3
foreign participation in turnkey and joint venture pro
jects to provide the required training. It is also being
addressed by borrowing more many to achieve these goals.
For example, the World Bank in 1977 advanced $45.5 million
out of a $111 million contract toward a technical training
program. This program is designed to correct shortages of
middle management and skilled labor. Over the period
1973-1978, the value of foreign "technical assistance"
alone has cost Algeria no less than DA 30 billion and has
represented a further major drain on its foreign exchange
resources.
Foreign machinery and technology does not consist
only of the purchase of technical units, but a technology
that requires the know-how for its use, maintenance, and
repair or replacement. These factors make it necessary
for the country to be more dependent on foreign skilled
labor, and to maintain a continuous relationship with the
foreign experts and professionals. The increased demand
for foreign technicians, professionals and qualified
workers, as a result of the industrialization policy, has
aggravated this situation.
A way out of this situation lies in the shift to
light industry and in the training of a large number of
high-level Algerian technicians capable of innovation.
The means of research must be at the top of economic
growth priorities. Plans to attract back to Algeria the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 4
most skilled of the large emigrant population in Europe
must be worked out.
Capital Shortage
In addition to the underutilization of technology and
the limitation of local skilled manpower, another strong
obstacle to the country's development has been the
shortage of capital. Unlike major Middle East oil pro
ducers, Algeria has not generated oil income on a scale
sufficient to finance its extensive development plans. It
has therefore had to seek foreign loans to finance many of
its projects. For example, by 1978 debt servicing repre
sented no less than 25 percent of the current value of
exports. This high debt service has been a major obstacle
to the country's development, particularly since repayment
on existing external debts has amounted to about DA 80
billion over the period 1980-84.
Underdeveloped Infrastructure
Due to the priority given to hydrocarbons and the
application of an intensive industrialization policy, the
development of infrastructure has been neglected for the
past two decades. Emphasis on developing one sector, of
course, by definition demands drawing resources away from
another. As a result, the country now is facing a housing
crisis, education that has failed to provide the necessary
trained manpower, insufficient medical care, undeveloped
transportation network, and inadequate roads and railways.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 5
For example, the housing crisis is not due only to the
lacking of construction materials and entrepreneurs, but
also due to the priority given to investment in the indus
trial sector. The absence of a well developed infra
structure has conceived one of the major obstacles to
economic development of the country. Special attention
and more investment in the economic and social infrastruc
ture is required if industrialization is to take place.
Class Structure
Due to the denial of workers participation in deci
sion making and the distance placed between them and the
means of production, a total disinterestedness and the
loss of a sense of security among the workers has been
generated, which has a direct effect on production. The
permanent confrontation between the bureaucratic bour
geoisie and the workers at different levels of social and
economic apparatuses has prevented the development goals
to be achieved.
For example, Gerard Chaliand, in his work Mythes
revolutionnaires du Tiers-Monde, dismisses Algeria's
socialist pretensions and indicates that the bureaucrats,
acting as managers for the interests of the bourgeois 3 class, have excessively centralized the state apparatus.
The linkage of the national bourgeois interests with the
3Gerard Chaliand, Mythes revolutionnaires du Tiers- Monde (Paris: Sevil, 1976), p. 152.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 6
interests of the international monopolists; created by
Algeria's export-oriented industrial ambitions on one
hand, and the dependency on technological imports on the
other hand; has prevented Algeria from achieving a real
economic development and self-sufficiency. A new society
cannot be developed using methods and structures that are
part of the development of capitalism. Any reform without
total structural transformation, organizational and soci
etal change, and workers participation in the political
and economic decision making will not lead to sound eco
nomic development. Thus, workers must continue their
struggle and not simply demand material benefits, but
realize that capitalism is the enemy of their well-being.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. C H A PTE R X I
CONCLUSION
In this study, we have discussed the process of
industrialization and economic development taking place in
Algeria over a period of twenty-two years (1962-1984) .
The process of industrialization and economic development
is analyzed from the perspective of political economy and
viewed within the international economic order, whereby
the major external economic factors in shaping Algerian
industrialization have been discussed. The focus of this
study has been the process of industrialization and eco
nomic development in Algeria in a comprehensive sense.
Planned economic development in Algeria began with
the three-year plan (1967-69), which represented the first
phase of a long range development program running into the
19 80s. The three-year plan was followed by the first
four-year plan (1970-73) and the second four-year plan
(1974-77). The two succeeding years, 1978 and 1979, were
viewed by Algerian officials as a period of transition
during which attempts were made to complete the many
projects started during the first and second four year
plans. The first five-year plan followed as another step
in the economic development of the country. All these
347
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 8
economic development plans, without exception, have empha
sized the establishment of a capital-intensive industry,
involving hydrocarbons, iron and steel, chemical, and
engineering, to serve as a basis for economic growth and
industrialization.
It is clear from discussing the oil, natural gas, and
petrochemical industries that the hydrocarbons sector is
perceived as a vital base for establishing industrializa
tion. It was given the top priority in terms of budget
allocation. In fact, a very substantial proportion of the
investment in industry to date has gone into the hydro
carbons industry, which still provides over 80 percent of
the country's foreign exchange earnings and as much as 90
percent of the government's domestic revenues (see Graph
1) . Algeria seems to deal mainly with the capitalist
block. Most of its oil and gas exports go to West Europe
and North America (see Table 25); all its liquified natur
al gas plants have been constructed by European and Ameri
can firms (see Table 33) ; its main gas customers are
France, West Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom,
Belgium, the United States, and Canada; and finally, most
of its ongoing oil and gas contracts are carried out with
West Europe, Japan and North America (U.S. and Canada).
The hydrocarbons sector is strongly dependent on the
international market (capitalist block) in terms of ex
port, plants construction, and contracts.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 4 9
Although recently the hydrocarbons industry has known
some integration from the production point of view, the
integration hoped for by policy-makers between the econom
ic sectors, such as industry and agriculture, has yet to
occur. The thesis of De Bernis, which was based mainly on
the development of "industrializing industries" (heavy
industry and hydrocarbons) as a means for an integrated
and independent economic development, has led to the
opposite result. That is, the development of the hydro
carbons sector was achieved at the expense of other eco
nomic sectors, such as agriculture and infrastructure,
which resulted in (1) uneven economic development, as we
have already seen in Chapter VIII; and (2) the formation
of a new social class, the petty bourgeoisie. This new
social class is a product of the industrialization process
taking place in Algeria (see Figure 3).
This study also confirms the dominance of heavy
industry in the national economy. Heavy industry alone
represented 34.9 percent of total industrial production in
1975. This percentage has increased in recent years.
Algeria's main development efforts to date have been in
industry (including hydrocarbons) which has received over
60 percent of all the investment made since the start of
the first plan (the three-year plan of 1967-69). Algeria
is indeed moving toward greater promotion of capital-
intensive industry, rather than large-scale labor-
intensive industry (see Graph 6).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 0
According to Benissad, the branches of heavy industry
are strongly dependent. For example, the rate of foreign
dependency in the construction material industries is 50.9
percent. This rate of dependency has increased during
recent years because of the increase in cement demands.
It will be even greater when all national demands have
been satisfied. The metallurgy, mechanical and electric
industries, which are responsible for importing heavy
machines and equipment needed for rapid industrialization,
are strongly dependent on foreign countries. The coeffi
cient of foreign dependency in these industries reached
76.3 percent.1
Therefore, De Bernis' thesis that the development of
heavy industry (including hydrocarbons), which produces
the means of production rather than consumption goods,
will lead to an independent national economy and indus
trialization, is not valid. As a matter of fact, con
centration upon developing heavy industry has led to two
results. First, the neglect of agriculture and infra
structure has created uneven development; and second, the
national economy and industrialization have become more
dependent on the neo-colonialist economy and further
integrated into the international capitalist system.
1 ' ' M.E. Benissad, Economie du developpement de 1 1Algerie (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 140.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 1
With regard to light industry, the degree of foreign
dependency is in general less than that of heavy industry.
In the textile branch, the coefficient of foreign depen
dency is 6.6 percent, which proves that substitution for
imports has achieved a high level in this branch of indus
try, although Algeria still imports cotton and some fin
ished textile products. In the leather and shoe indus
tries the substitution of imports is very advanced, and
the coefficient of imports is no more than 2.7 percent.
In the agro-alimentary industries, the coefficient of
foreign dependency remained somewhat high at 26.2 percent.
Finally, in the chemical industry, the coefficient of
dependency has remained high at 6 0.1 percent (see Graph
3) .
This dissimilarity in degrees of foreign dependency
among the different industrial branches is explained by
two factors: the lack of local input and the complexity of
technology needed to put the industry into operation. For
example, substitution of imports in the pharmaceutical
industry (chemistry branch) is more difficult because of a
lack of input (raw material) and know-how, than in the
shoe industry (leather branch), where the input is avail
able and know-how is easy to obtain. Another factor
determining the trend of substitution is that state policy
is stricter with regard to imports in the light industry
sector.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 2
Concerning the structure of investment in agricul
ture, this study argues that agriculture has been consis
tently misrepresented. Algeria's three-year plan allo
cated investment totaling DA 12 billion, of which DA 5,400
million (or 42.8%) went to industry and only DA 1,900
million (or 15%) went to agriculture (see Table 60) .
During the first four-year plan, total investment was DA
27 billion. DA 12,400 million (or 45%) was devoted to
industry, and only DA 4,140 million (or 15%) was directed
to agriculture (see Table 56). Algeria's second four-year
plan allocated investments totaling DA 110 billion. As in
the first four-year plan, industrialization continued to
receive top priority, with 43.5 percent of total planned
outlet, while agriculture received only 10.9 percent (see
Table 58 and Graph 4, which show the general investment
trends of industrialization and agriculture during the
last two decades).
Consequently, Algeria has imported a growing propor
tion of its food. In 1979, for example, it imported over
30 percent of its grain and milk, over 50 percent of its
eggs, 80 percent of its vegetable oil, and nearly all its 2 butter and sugar. Increasing rural-urban inequality,
rapid migration off the land, and uneven development were
the result. This is due not only to natural constraints
^COMET, The 1980-84 Algerian Five-Year Plan (London: Committee for Middle East Trade, 1981) , p. 25~.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 3
and lack of human resources, but to the industrialization
policy followed by the state (see Graph 5).
Algerian dependency is not only due to the country's
dependency on imported consumer goods and the essential
capital for industry, but also to the increasing importa
tion of foreign technology. Intensively importing foreign
technology, of course, has and will prevent Algeria from
being self-sufficient and creating an appropriate techno
logical environment and innovation. Moreover, all signs
indicate that technology transfer will continue as the
industrialization of the country progresses. This means
that reduced technological dependency on the industrial
ized countries is still far from being achieved in the
case of Algeria. Technology transfers did not create
enough jobs for the increasing labor force. This implies
that import promotion of advanced technology and employ
ment policies are in conflict, since importation of
advanced technology usually undermines the growth of
labor-intensive industries.
The findings of this study clearly show that indus
trialization cannot be achieved only by transferring new
technologies and establishing intensive industrial pro
jects, but rather by establishing the necessary infra
structure to receive this technology. Human resources
must be developed, engineering and design capabilities
must be created and expanded, existing research institu
tions must be improved, and productivity of national
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 4
companies must be increased. When the technological base
of Algeria reaches this level, the country will become
better prepared to use and benefit from advanced foreign
technologies. Economic development is not only a matter
of importing new technology and techniques, but also
establishing a sound social and economic infrastructure
and using technology in a way that suits local needs. The
findings of this study suggest that since the technologi
cal base does not yet exist, the option of industrializa
tion and importation of advanced technology will not lead
to innovation, but will aggravate economic dependency, at
least for the middle term.
Financing the process of industrialization in Algeria
depends and will depend increasingly on the international
financing market. The preceding years were marked by a
tendency of shifting the direction of dependency from
Europe in general to the United States and Arab oil coun
tries. This dependency is explained by the augmentation
of loans Algeria obtains every year. Therefore, financing
industrialization through foreign bank loans and credit
implies the integration of the Algerian economy into the
international system, which is dominated by capitalist
production and the imperialist interests of the interna
tional monopolists. This leads to the confirmation of the
research questions and thereby to the thesis of the study
that there is indeed a contradiction between establishing
socialism and the participation of foreign capital in
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 5
financing Algeria's davelopment. Dependent development is
unavoidable if industrialization occurs under foreign
capital.
In examining the educational system, this study
confirms that education has a direct effect on economic
development through the supply of trained manpower (e.g.,
entrepreneurs, technicians, managers, and skilled labor).
Existing education is seen here as a basic factor under
mining economic development. How can economic development
be achieved without skilled manpower to do the work that
economic development entails? One of the main factors in
determining economic development is the ability of the
educational system to provide trained manpower and the
skills required by various fields of economic activity.
In this respect, Algeria cannot, with the existing educa
tional system, provide the necessary skilled manpower.
This is due to the fact that Algeria's educational system
was not well organized and oriented toward its economic
goals. Few people with adequate technical, commercial,
and agricultural training enter the labor force. The
institutional infrastructure compatible with a changing
society is absent. The result is dependency upon foreign
skilled labor in major economic and industrial activities.
Although investment in education and vocational
training has been of major concern to the authorities
since independence, the priority has been on providing
locations for schools. Special emphasis must be put on
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 6
improving the content of education, especially in higher
education, where there has been considerable under
fulfillment of past plans.
Since 1962, three different Algerian regimes have
consistently claimed as their main goal the construction
of a socialist system. But even those who have admitted
Algeria's pretensions to socialist or in-transition-to-
socialist status would still classify the Algerian ap
proach as interventionist or, in the apt French term,
"dirigiste." In light of the growth in size and power of
the bureaucratic strata in Algerian society, the short
comings of the participation mechanisms at all levels, and
the unavoidable linkages with the world capitalist system
created by Algeria's export-oriented industrial ambitions,
this study confirms the hypothesis that the petty bour
geoisie has become the dominant class in Algerian society,
and that this factor ultimately accounts for the perform
ance of Algerian economic development and industrializa
tion. This research confirms the main thesis of the study
that throughout the actual process of industrialization,
Algeria is experiencing dependent capitalist economic
development.
At this point, it is necessary to point out that
since 1980, policy has been shifting in favor of agricul
ture, social infrastructure (housing, education), and
light industry. An immediate effect of the new policy was
reflected in the annual development budget allocation
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 7
for the financial year 1980. The allocation for heavy
industry was cut back to DA 7.8 billion, whereas light
industry, which is regarded as having a great impact on
consumer demands, was given an increased allocation of DA 3 8 billion as compared to DA 6.8 billion in 1979. The
recent achievement of light industry is due to the fact
that this sector is more integrated into the national
agricultural sector, from which it receives around 41
percent of its input, and that increased attention was
given to light industry during the period of the first
five-year plan (1980-84).
Under the first five-year plan, more emphasis was
directed to social infrastructure and agriculture.
Thirty-two percent of total expenditures was devoted to
social infrastructure, compared to 38 percent allocated to
industry (see Table 59). The country's critical housing
shortage received an investment allocation of DA 60 bil
lion of total planned investment; education, training and
social infrastructure together comprised about DA 118.5
billion of total planned investment. Although development
of agriculture is still inferior in terms of investment,
cuts in the industry budgets are registered (38% compared
to 43.5% during the previous plan 1974-77; see Table 60).
This could be seen as the first step in the right direc
tion.
3 Ibid., p. 29.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 8
We can conclude that despite government efforts, many
problems remain, and these policies will continue to
demand revision and reevaluation in the years ahead.
Based on the above conclusions, we can make the following
recommendations.
The scarcity of higher cadres and the lack of indi
genous trained manpower have had several consequences.
First, the middle qualified cadres assumed the higher
responsibilities without adequate qualifications. This
situation resulted in a reduction in the quality and
efficiency of production and in a low level of innovation.
Second, dependency upon foreign expertise and skilled
manpower is intensified. We recommend that the Algerian
educational system be reconstructed on the bases of effi
ciency and quality, and be directed toward the economic
development of the country. The call for establishing
technological institutes is the first step toward recon
sidering the system of education. Incentives are very
essential if the local skilled manpower is to be kept in
the country and used effectively.
We believe that there is considerable agricultural
potential in Algeria, but the agricultural development
strategy needs reform, particularly with respect to subsi
dies, cultivated land, credit, marketing extension, re
search, irrigation, and investment. As a result of indus
trialization, the ecological situation of Algeria has been
transformed. The extensive installation of industrial
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 5 9
plants at the expense of cultivated land contributed to
the country's scarcity of agricultural land, causing a
considerable loss for the farmers. We recommend the
protection of land from transformation to industrial
zones, introduction of an extensive program to provide the
needed water, an improvement in vegetable cultivation
under cover, and a significant increase in domestic produc
tion to meet the major part of the country's needs.
Consideration of the long term demographic level of growth
implies the need for new approaches to agricultural devel
opment which must take into consideration natural, techni
cal, and institutional obstacles, as well as the complete
transformation of working conditions and relations of
production in the agricultural sector.
The industrialization policy aimed at achieving
effective self-sufficiency calls for a high level of
technological competence. The key was seen in the hydro
carbons sector, which would provide financing and basic
raw materials. Financed by exports of petroleum and
natural gas, iron ores would be made to provide the raw
material for the steel industry. The steel industry would
provide the metal needed for the pipelines that would feed
the hydrocarbons from the Sahara fields to expanded trans
formation and export facilities on the coast.
However, the tremendous potential of Algeria's hydro
carbons is matched by a corresponding demand for foreign
participation. Despite the investment correction which
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6 0
seems to be in favor of light industry, the heavy industry
sector (including hydrocarbons) continued to consume large
amounts of capital investments through the first-five year
plan (1980-1984). In addition, because of the high cost
of building these industries and because of inefficiency
and lack of trained workers, it is almost impossible to
produce cheap goods that are marketable in foreign ex
change. We recommend that a further reduction in heavy
industry must be applied and that more attention be dir
ected to light industry that produces consumer goods
directly affecting the basic needs of the population,
simply because the fundamental law of socialism is the
satisfaction of the basic needs of the majority of the
people.
As suggested by official plans and import trends,
Algeria, as a developing country, has depended heavily on
imports of technology, and this dependence is likely to
continue in the foreseeable future. The contribution of
imported technology to exports has been limited, since the
major Algerian exports are still raw materials and prod
ucts of light industries such as textiles and leathers.
Technology transfers to Algeria did not solve the problem
of unemployment and underemployment through creating
enough jobs for the increasing number of the labor force.
We recommend a new policy aimed at shifting the emphasis
from importing a highly sophisticated and very expensive
technology to a technology that can easily be handled by
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6 1
Algerian skilled labor and is within the financial capa
city of the country.
In the final analysis, the challenge to policy makers
is to design policies that will bring about a sound so
cialist economic development and industrialization without
being completely subordinated to foreign economic struc
tures and policies. Fundamental changes in the societal
structure and in the relations of production are absolute
ly required if the goals of industrialization and economic
development are to be achieved.
Finally, it is hoped that this study helps provide a
better understanding of the Algerian social formation and
its transition from a colonial capitalist social formation
to a dependent capitalist nation in the near future. It
is also hoped that this study would be helpful to the
Algerian government and its economic institutions in
carrying out its development plans in the future.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPENDIX A
MAIN HYDROCARBONS INSTALLATIONS
TUNISIE
o\
*5
Hasti R* M«l
Hm u M « tM O iid
- Oil Pipeline - Gas Pipeline
— Condensate Pipeline Export of Crude Petroleum
V Export Refined Products
< Export of IMG \
i Hydrocarbon Resources
0 Liquefied Gas Factory
O Refined Oil Factory
Source: J. Schnetzler, Le developpement Algerien (Paris: Masson, 1981), P.56.
362
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPENDIX B
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION BY WILAYA AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
Annabd TmOtizou onsiantine
"FT Asnam Mostagapen
Tlemcen Medea
4sooo salarie; •Public •Pnve
Source: John Waterburg, Land, Man, and Development in Algeria (New York: American Universities Field Staff, Vol. XVII, No. 3, 1973), P.9.
363
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. BIBLIOGRAPHY
ABC. Political Terms. Moscow, Novosti Press Aqency, 1982.
Adler, Stephen. International Migration and Dependence. London: Gower Publishing Company, 1981.
Alleg, Henri. "Perspectives of the National Liberation Movement." Marxism Today (September 1969).
Amin, Samir. Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism. Translated by Brian Peace. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976.
Asharq Al-Awsat, The International Arab Journal. May 22, 1985.
Banque Mondiale, Rapport Annuel. Washington D.C.: Banque Mondiale, 1975.
Baran, Paul. The Political Economy of Growth. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1957.
Benachenhou, A. Formation du sous-developpement en Algerie: essai sur les limites de dfeveloppement du capitalisme 1830-1962. Alger: Office des Publica tions Universitaires, 1976.
______. Planification et developpement en Algerie 1962-80. Alger: CREA, 1980.
Bendjadid, Chadli. Discours du President Chadli Bendjadid. Alger! Ministere de 1' Information-^ de la Culture, 1980.
Benhouria, Tahar. L'economie de l 1Algerie. Paris: Maspero, 1980.
Benissad, M.E. Economie du developpement de l1Algerie. Paris: Economica, 1979.
Bennamane, Aissa. The Algerian Development Strategy and Employment Policy. Norwich, CT: Geo-Abstracts, 1980.
364
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6 5
Bennoune, Mahfoud. Algerian Peasants and National Poli tics. Washington, D.C.: MERIP Reports, 1976.
Blaire, Thomas L. The Land to Those Who Work It. Garden City: Doubleday, 1970.
Boumedienne, Houari. Citations du President Boumedienne. Alger: Societe Nationale d'Edition et des Publications, 1970.
______. Discours du President Boumedienne. Constantine: El-Baath, Vol. II, 1970.
______. Discours du President Boumedienne. Alger: Ministere de 1'Information et de la Culture, 1970.
______. Discours du President Boumedienne. Alger: SNED, Vol. VIII, 1979.
______. Speech by Boumedienne on XIV Anniversary of 1st November 1954.
Chaliand, Gerard. Mythes revolutionnaires du Tiers-Monde. Paris: Sevil, 1976.
Clegg, Ian. Workers' Self-Management in Algeria. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971.
De Bernis, Gerard Destanne. "Deux strategies pour 1'industrialisation du Tiers-Monde: Les industries industrialisantes et les options algeriennes." Revue Tiers-Monde XII (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, No. 47, Juillet-Septembre, 1971) .
Decoufle, A. "Aspects socio-politiques de 1'Accord Franco- Algerien du 29 Juillet 1965 sur les hydrocarbures et le developpement de 1’Algerie." Economie Appliguee XIX (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, No. 3-4), 1966.
COMET. The 1980-84 Algerian Five-Year Plan. London: Committee for Middle East Trade, 1981.
Dos Santos, Theotonio. "The Structure of Dependence." American Economic Review 60 (May 1970).
EIU. Quarterly Economic Review of Algeria. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, No. 1, 1984; No. 2, 1984; No. 3, 1984; No. 1, 1985; No. 2, 1985.
El-Moudjahid (National Daily Newspaper), May 12, 1976; May 13, 1976; May 18, 1976; March 21, 1977.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6 6
Elsenhans, H. "Some Contradictions in Algeria's Develop ment Strategies." Maghreb Review, May 1982, p. 64.
FLN. Algeria: Questions and Answers. New York, 1960.
Frank, Andre G. "Sociology of Development and Underdevel opment of Sociology." In Dependence and Underdevelopment, ed. J.D. Cockcroft et al. Garden City: Anchor, 1972.
______. "The Development of Underdevelopment." In The Political Economy of Development and Under development, ed. Charles K. Wilber. New York: Random House, 1973.
Front de Liberation Nationale. Projet de charte nation- ale. Alger, El-Moudjahid, 1976.
Furtado, Celso. "The Concept of External Dependence in the Study of Underdevelopment." In The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment, ed. Charles K. Wilber. New York: Random House, 1973.
Gallissot, Rene. L'Algerie precoloniale: classes sociales en systeme precapitalist^. Paris: Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Marxistes, 1968.
Gauthier, Andre.t L'Algerie: • decolonialisation, * social- isme, industrialisation. Montreal, Canada: Breal Editeur, 1976.
Gauthier, Yves. Naissance et croissance de la republigue alge'rienne d£mocratique et populaire. Paris: Edition Marketing, 1978.
Griffin, Keith. "Underdevelopment in History." In The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelop ment , ed. C. Wilber. New York: Random House, 1973.
Gurley, John. "Economic Development: A Marxist View." In Directions in Economic Development, Edited by Kenneth P. Jameson and Charles K. Wilber, Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame University Press, 1979.
International Monetary Fund. Surveys of African Econo mies . Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1977.
______. Direction of Trade Statistics: Year Book 19 82. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1982.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6 7
Jackson, Henry F. The FLN in Algeria. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977.
Jean-Claude, Hazera. "Algerie: 1'industrialisation." Les Dossiers Jeune Afrique: 1 1 industrialisation du Tiers- Monde 3 (1975).
Kahia-Tani, M. Influence des revenues petroliers sur le developpement 'economique en Algerie. Alger: S.I.- S.N., 1977.
Koulytchizky, Serge. L'autogestion, l'homme, et l'etat. Paris: Mouton, 1974.
Kramer, Jack. Algeria. New York: Chase World Information Corp., 1978.
Lazreg, Maria. The Emergence of Classes in Algeria. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1976.
Leys, Colin. "Underdevelopment and Dependence: Critical Notes." Journal of Contemporary Asia 7 (1977).
Mahroug, M. "Les grandes lignes du budget pour 1975." El-Moujahid, 8 Janvier, 1975.
Marches Tropicaux et Mediterraneans 1809 (Juillet 1980) .
Martens, Jean-Claude. Le modele alge'rien de developpe ment . Alger: Societe Nationale d'Edition et de Publication, 1973.
Marx, Karl. Pre-Capitalist Economic Formation. Trans lated by Jack Cohen. New York: International Pub lishers, 1965.
Mergui, Raphael. "L'agriculture algerienne: les ingen- ieurs de la revolution." Jeune Afrique (Decembre, 1972).
Middle East and North Africa, London, Europa Publications, 1982-83.
Miette, Roland. "L'autogestion agricole en Algerie." L 1Afrique et l'Asie Modernes, 1974.
______. "Les cooperatives pastorales en Algerie." L'Afrique et l'Asie Modernes, 1974.
______. "Le systeme politique algerien." L'Afrique et l'Asie Modernes, 1977.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6 8
Minces, J. I1Algerie de Boumedienne. Paris: Presses de la cite, 1978.
Ministry of Information and Culture of Algeria. Industry in Algeria. Algiers: Ministry of Information and Culture, 1969.
______. Basic Industries. Algiers: Ministry of Information and Culture, 1971.
______. Algeria 1965-1969. Algiers: Ministry of Information and Culture, 1970.
______. The Four-Year Plan 1970-1973. Algiers: Ministry of Information and Culture, 1970.
Ministry of Planning and Regional Development. "Inver- tissement." Synthese du bilan economique et social de la decennie. Alger: Mimstere du Plan, Mai 1980.
Nash, J. (Ed.) Popular Participation in Social Change: Cooperatives, Collectives and Nationalized Industry. The Hague, 1976.
Nellis, John R. The Algerian National Charter of 1976. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University CCAS, 1980.
Nelson, Harold D. (Ed.) Algeria: A Country Study. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1979.
Nouschi, Andjre. La naissance du nationalisme algerien. Paris: Edition de Minuit, 1979.
OECD. Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, 1977-1980. Pans: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1981.
OTA. Manpower and Training in Algeria. Washington D.C.: OTA, 1982.
Ottaway, Marine. Algeria: The Politics of a Socialist Revolution. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970.
Peneff, Jean. Industriels algeriens. Paris: Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique, 1981.
Pfeifer, Karen. "State Capitalism and Development." MERIP Reports, 1979.
Philips, A. "The Concept of Development." Review of African Political Economy 8 (1977).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 6 9
Popov, Yuri. Marxist Political Economy as Applied to the African Scene. Moscow: Novosti Press Agency, 1973.
______. The Developing Countries from the Stand point of Marxist Political Economy. Moscow: Novosti Press Agency, 1977.
Poulantzas, Nicos. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso, 1978.
Raffinot, Marc. Le capitalisme d'etat alge'rien. Paris: Maspero, 1977.
Said-Amer, Tayeb. L 'industrialisation en Algerie. Paris: Anthropos, 1978.
0 / Schnetzler, Jacques. Le developpement algerien. Paris: Masson, 1981.
Schliephake, Konrad. Oil and Regional Development. New York: Praeger, 1977.
Secretariat D'Etat au Plan (Algeria). Productions indus- trielles et indices de la production industrielle 1969-1975. Alger: Le Bureau du Statistique, 1977. / , ______. Etude Industrie privee. Alger, 1975.
______. Annuaire statistique de 1 'Algerie 1976. Alger, 1977.
______. IIe Plan quadriennal 1974-1977: rapport general" Alger: Imprimerie Officielle, 1974.
Secretariat Social d'Alger. Le developpement economique processus d'addaptions structurelles. Alger: Societe Nationale d'Edition et de Publications, 1968.
______. La micro-industrie; au service de 1 1 industrialisation de I1Algerie. Alger, 1960.
Seers, Dudley. "The Meaning of Development." In Develop ment Theory. Edited by D. Lehman. London: Frank Cass, 1979.
Sivan, Emmanuel. Communisme et nationalisme en Algerie. Paris: Press de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, 1976.
Solodovnikov, V.G. "The Non-Capitalist Road of Develop ment in Africa." Marxism Today 13 (September 1969).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 7 0
Spri'.gborg, Robert. "New Patterns of Agrarian Reform in the Middle East and North Africa." The Middle East Journal 31 (1977) .
Temmar, Hammid. Structures et modele de developpement de l'e'conomie de 1'Algerie. Alger: SNED, 1974.
______. Strateqie de developpement independant: le cas de l'Algene. Paris: Editions Publisud, 1983.
Tiano, Andre. La dialectique de la dependance. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1977.
Todaro, Michael. Economic Development in the Third World. New York: Longmans, 1977.
United Nations. Review of International Trade and Development 1969. New York: United Nations Publications, 1969.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Country Market Survey: Algeria. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, April 1982.
U.S. Department of Housing, The Constantine Plan for Algeria. Washington D.C., 1961.
U.S. Department of Labor. Algeria: Country Labor Profile. Washington, D.C.: Office of Foreign Labor Affairs, 1980.
U.S. Department of State. Algeria: Background Notes. Washington, D.C.: State Department, 1981.
Van Dam, Andre. "Global Development from Confrontation to Cooperation." Studies in Comparative International Development 10 (1975) .
Van Raider, Rene. "La revolution agraire en Algerie: tournant politique ou inflechissement technique?" Civilisations 25 (1975) .
The Washington Post, April 14, 1985.
Waterburg, John. Land, Man, and Development in Algeria: Problems of Trained Manpower, Industry, and Agricul ture. American Universities Field Staff, Vol. XVII, No. 1, 1973).
______. Land, Man, and Development in Algeria: The Four-Year Plan. American Universities Field Staff, Vol. XVII, No. 3, 1973.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 7 1
Wilber, Charles, ed. The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment. New York: Random House, 1979.
World Bank. World Development Report. Washinqton, D.C., 1979, 1980.
______. Algeria: Recent Economic Development and Prospects: The Five-Year Plan 1980-1984. Washington, D.C. 1980.
______. The Agricultural Development Experience of Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia. Washington D.C.: 1982.
Wright, Erik Olin. Class, Crisis and the State. London: Verso, 1979.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.