DOCSLIB.ORG

Government of Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Government of Indonesia GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA Control Risks Indonesia MINISTRY KEY Menara Prima 2nd floor, Jl. DR. Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung Block 6.2 Kawasan Mega Kuningan, Jakarta Selatan 12950 Professional PRESIDENT JOKO WIDODO Appointment T: + 62 21 5794 8044 VICE PRESIDENT JUSUF KALLA Political [email protected] Appointment KEY FOR POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION 1. PDI-P – Indonesia Democratic Party of Struggle 6. Golkar – Party of the Functional Groups Coordinating Minister for Coordinating Minister for Coordinating Minister for the Coordinating Minister for Human Chairperson : Megawati Soekarnoputri Chairperson: Setya Novanto Political, Legal & Security Maritime Affairs Economy Development & Culture Office of the President Affairs 2. PKB – National Awakening Party 7. PKS – Prosperous Justice Party Luhut Panjaitan Darmin Nasution Puan Maharani (PDI-P) Chairperson: Muhaimin Iskandar Chairperson: Sohibul Iman Wiranto (Hanura) 3. NasDem – National Democratic Party 8. PPP – United Development Party Chairperson: Surya Paloh Chairperson: M Romahurmuziy Primary & Secondary Energy & Natural Finance Trade Religious Affairs 4. Hanura – People’s Conscience Party 9. PD – Democratic Party Chief of Staff Defense Foreign Affairs Education & Culture Resources Chairperson: Wiranto Chairperson: Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Enggartiasto Lukita Lukman Hakim Saifuddin Teten Masduki Ryamizard Ryacudu Archandra Tahar Sri Mulyani Indrawati Muhadjir Effendi Retno Marsudi (NasDem) (PPP) 5. Gerindra – Great Indonesia Movement Party 10. PAN – National Mandate Party Chairperson: Prabowo Subianto Chairperson: Zulkifli Hasan Administrative Research / Technology & Cabinet Secretary Justice & Human Rights Transportation State-Owned Enterprises Industry Health Reforms Higher Education Airlangga Hartanto Rini Soemarno Nila Moeloek Muhamad Nasir Pramono Anung Wibowo Asman Abnur (PAN) Yasonna Laoly (PDI-P) Budi Karya Sumadi (Golkar) Other Key Entities Communications & Maritime Affairs & Cooperatives & SMEs Public Works & Housing Social Affairs Youth and Sports Affairs State Secretariat (SETNEG) Information Home Affairs Fisheries Technology Anak Agung Puspayoga Khofifah Indar Parawansa Susi Pudjiastuti Basuki Hadimuljono Pratikno Rudiantara Tjahjo Kumolo (PDI-P) (PDI-P) (PKB) Imam Nahrawi (PKB) Anti-Corruption Indonesia Investment Bank Indonesia Commission (KPK) Coordinating Board (BKPM) Executive Executive Branch National Development Development of Tourism Agriculture Forestry & Environment Women’s Empowerment Planning Agency Disadvantaged Regions Agus Rahardjo Thomas Lembong Agus Martowardojo & Child Protection (BAPPENAS) and Transmigration Arief Yahya Amran Sulaiman Bambang Brodjonegoro Siti Nurbaya (Nasdem) Yohana Yambise Eko Putro Sanjoyo (PKB) Financial Services Authority Attorney General Office Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) Land and Spacial (OJK) Manpower Finance and Development Planning Supervisory Agency (BPKP) HM Prasetyo (NasDem) Harry Azhar Azis Muliaman Hadad Hanif Dhakiri (PKB) Sofyan Djalil Ardan Adiperdana *The above-mentioned organizations are key institutions with independent status under the Government. DPR main functions: legislative, budgeting and oversight. The DPR drafts and passes laws; reviews and approves regulations in lieu of law; and reviews proposals from the DPD on regional issues. The DPR also works MPR with the President to produce the annual budget. Membership is determined based on national legislative elections held every 5 years, the most recent in 2014. There are 11 commissions responsible for formulating bills to (People’s Consultative Assembly) DPR be submitted for consideration. DPD - 132 seats Deputy Speaker Speaker Deputy Speaker Abdul Kharis Almasyhari (PKS) Chair Chairman: Teguh Juwarno (PAN) DPR – 560 seats Commission I Commission VI (Regional Representative Council) (People’s Representative Deputies: Meutya Hafid (Golkar) Deputies: Dodi Noerdin (Golkar) Taufik Kurniawan, PAN Ade Komarudin, Golkar Fadli Zon, Gerindra Council) Defense, Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Asril Tanjung (Gerindra) T.B. Hasanuddin (PDIP) Trade, Industry, Investment, Cooperatives, SMEs and Mohamad Hekal (Gerindra) - Serves an advisory function, not legislative Information Hanafi Rais (PAN) State-Owned Companies Azam Natawijana (PD) - 3 Regions: Java, Eastern Indonesia, Other Deputy Speaker Deputy Speaker - 132 seats allocated 4 per province for equal DPRD Provincial Level Council representation. Agus Hermanto, PD Fahri Hamzah Commission II Chairman: Rambe Zaman (Golkar) Commission VII Chairman: Gus Irawan Pasaribu (Gerindra) Speaker: TBD DPRD Regional / Municipality Deputies: Lukman Edy (PKB) Deputies: Satya Yudha (Golkar) Internal Affairs, Regional Autonomy, Elections, Energy and Natural Resources, Research and Deputies: Farouk Muhammad and Gusti Hemas Level Council Ahmad Patria (Gerindra) Wahidin Halim (PD) Mulyadi (PD) Agrarian Affairs Technology, Environment Muzzammil Yusuf (PKS) Tamsil Linrung (PKS) The MPR is a joint session of the DPR and DPD and is empowered to amend the constitution and impeach the president. Gerindra, 73 PDI-P, 109 Procedures for Constitutional Amendments: Chairman: Bambang Soestayo (Golkar) Chairman: M. Ali Taher (PAN) Commission III Commission VIII • A vote to amend must have 2/3 of MPR members present and a majority of votes in favor = 50% + Deputies: Desmond Mahesa (Gerindra) Deputies: Abdul Haramain (PKB) 1. PKS, 40 Laws, Human Rights and Security Affairs Benny Harman (PD) Trimedia Panjaitan (PDIP) Religion, Social Affairs, Women’s Empowerment Deding Ishak (Golkar) Iskan Lubis (PKS) Mulfachri Harahap (PAN) Sodik Mudjahid (Gerindra) Impeachment: • DPR (with 2/3 attending and supported by 2/3 attendees in a plenary session) requests the Constitutional Court to investigate wrong doings PKB, 47 Commission IV Chairman: Edhy Prabowo (Gerindra) Chairman: Dede Yusuf (PD) PD , 61 Commission IX • Constitutional Court has 30 days to investigate and decide on DPR’s proposed motion Deputies: Siti Soeharto (Golkar) • If Constitutional Court determines an offense occurred and / or proves the President or VP are no Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries, Food and Deputies: Syamsul Bachri (Golkar) Legislative Branch Legislative Herman Khaeron (PD) Health, Population, Manpower and Transmigration Hanura, 16 Maritime Affairs Pius Lustrilanang (Gerindra) longer eligible, DPR will hold a plenary session to propose dismissal Viva Mauladi (PAN) • MPR holds a session NLT 30 days post-receipt of DPR proposal • MPR decision via a plenary session of MPR attended by ¾ of total MPR members and accepted by Nasdem, 36 2/3 of attendees following explanation from President or VP. Chairman: Fary Francis (Gerindra) Chairman: Teuku Harsya (PD) Commission V Commission X Golkar, 91 Deputies: Mohamad Said (Golkar) Deputies: Ferdiansyah (Golkar) Transport, Telecommunications, Public Housing, Education, Youth Affairs, Sports, Tourism, Creative MPR Majority Leadership (Red-&-White) PAN, 48 Lasarus (PDIP) Utut Adianto (PDIP) Sutan Hendra (Gerindra) PPP, 39 Rural Dev. and Public Works Economy and Culture Michael Wattimena (PD) Abdul Fikri (PKS) Speaker: Zulkifli Hasan, PAN Deputy Speakers E.E. Mangindaan, PD | Mahyudin, Golkar Commission XI Chairman: Ahmadi Noor Supit (Golkar) Hidayat Nur Wahid, PKS | Oesman Sapta Odang, DPD Red-&-White Partai Demokrat (PD): Great Indonesia Deputies: Soepriyanto (Gerindra) Coalition: 113Seats Unaffiliated 61 seats Coalition (KIH): Finances and Banking, National Development Muhammad Prakosa (PDIP) (est. 20%) (est. 11%) 386 Seats (est. 69%) Planning Marwan Asan (PD) Hafisz Tohir (PAN) Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung) Judicial Commission (Komisi Yudisial) The Indonesian Supreme Court is the highest level of the Judicial branch. Final court of appeal for criminal and civil verdicts, and resolves disputes between courts. Provides legal explanations, recommendations and advice to government institutions, and provides judicial reviews of final and binding court decisions. Assumes all organizational, financial and administrative responsibility for all lower Responsible for nominating judges to the Supreme Court courts per Department of Justice and Human Rights. and for oversight of judges in all courts. Members Constitutional Court appointed by President with concurrence from DPR. (Mahkamah Konstitusi) 51 judges divided into 8 chambers by: Chief Justice, Deputy Chief Justice, Junior Chief Justices (6), Associate Justices (43). Chief Justice: Hatta Ali Spokesman: Farid Wajdi • Judges are nominated by Judicial Commission The Constitutional Court is independent of the Supreme Court and rules on disputes • Appointed by President with concurrence of DPR and serve until a maximum of 70 years of age concerning the Constitution of Indonesia and matters regarding elections and political parties. Decides on constitutional validity of laws; decides disputes between state institutions; decides upon the dissolution of political parties; resolution of disputes related to the General Election. General High Courts of Appeal PTTUN Courts of Appeal Empowered to determine allegations of treason, corruption and bribery and to consider (Pengadilan Tinggi) Religious Courts of Appeal (Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Military Primary Courts of impeachment of President or Vice President. (Pengadilan Tinggi Agama) Negara) Appeal (Pengadilan Militer Tinggi) Courts of second instance or appeal. Resolve all disputes from All Constitutional Court decisions are binding. Commission for Supervision of District Courts. Generally a 3 judge panel and located in capital State administrative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indonesia Beyond Reformasi: Necessity and the “De-Centering” of Democracy
    INDONESIA BEYOND REFORMASI: NECESSITY AND THE “DE-CENTERING” OF DEMOCRACY Leonard C. Sebastian, Jonathan Chen and Adhi Priamarizki* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: TRANSITIONAL POLITICS IN INDONESIA ......................................... 2 R II. NECESSITY MAKES STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: THE GLOBAL AND DOMESTIC CONTEXT FOR DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA .................... 7 R III. NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ................... 12 R A. What Necessity Inevitably Entailed: Changes to Defining Features of the New Order ............. 12 R 1. Military Reform: From Dual Function (Dwifungsi) to NKRI ......................... 13 R 2. Taming Golkar: From Hegemony to Political Party .......................................... 21 R 3. Decentralizing the Executive and Devolution to the Regions................................. 26 R 4. Necessary Changes and Beyond: A Reflection .31 R IV. NON NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ............. 32 R A. After Necessity: A Political Tug of War........... 32 R 1. The Evolution of Legislative Elections ........ 33 R 2. The Introduction of Direct Presidential Elections ...................................... 44 R a. The 2004 Direct Presidential Elections . 47 R b. The 2009 Direct Presidential Elections . 48 R 3. The Emergence of Direct Local Elections ..... 50 R V. 2014: A WATERSHED ............................... 55 R * Leonard C. Sebastian is Associate Professor and Coordinator, Indonesia Pro- gramme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of In- ternational Studies, Nanyang Technological University,
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Political Parties and Democracy: a Comparative Study of Pks in Indonesia and Pas in Malaysia (1998-2005)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS ISLAMIC POLITICAL PARTIES AND DEMOCRACY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PKS IN INDONESIA AND PAS IN MALAYSIA (1998-2005) AHMAD ALI NURDIN S.Ag, (UIN), GradDipIslamicStud, MA (Hons) (UNE), MA (NUS) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES PROGRAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2009 Acknowledgements This work is the product of years of questioning, excitement, frustration, and above all enthusiasm. Thanks are due to the many people I have had the good fortune to interact with both professionally and in my personal life. While the responsibility for the views expressed in this work rests solely with me, I owe a great debt of gratitude to many people and institutions. First, I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Priyambudi Sulistiyanto, who was my principal supervisor before he transferred to Flinders University in Australia. He has inspired my research on Islamic political parties in Southeast Asia since the beginning of my studies at NUS. After he left Singapore he patiently continued to give me advice and to guide me in finishing my thesis. Thanks go to him for his insightful comments and frequent words of encouragement. After the departure of Dr. Priyambudi, Prof. Reynaldo C. Ileto, who was a member of my thesis committee from the start of my doctoral studies in NUS, kindly agreed to take over the task of supervision. He has been instrumental in the development of my academic career because of his intellectual stimulation and advice throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare in Transition
    Welfare in Transition The Political Economy of Social Protection Reform in Indonesia Maryke van Diermen Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts University of Adelaide December 2017 Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint award of this degree. I give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Signature of candidate: Date: 10/07/18 ii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support I have received from many people. I am thankful to them all but I wish to mention some in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Broadcasting Television Network Business in Indonesia?
    Network Intelligence Studies Volume VI, Issue 11 (1/2018) Rendra WIDYATAMA Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business University of Debrecen, Hungary Communication Department University of Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia Case WHO OWNS THE BROADCASTING Study TELEVISION NETWORK BUSINESS IN INDONESIA? Keywords Regulation, Parent TV Station, Private TV station, Business orientation, TV broadcasting network JEL Classification D22; L21; L51; L82 Abstract Broadcasting TV occupies a significant position in the community. Therefore, all the countries in the world give attention to TV broadcasting business. In Indonesia, the government requires TV stations to broadcast locally, except through networking. In this state, there are 763 private TV companies broadcasting free to air. Of these, some companies have many TV stations and build various broadcasting networks. In this article, the author reveals the substantial TV stations that control the market, based on literature studies. From the data analysis, there are 14 substantial free to network broadcast private TV broadcasters but owns by eight companies; these include the MNC Group, EMTEK, Viva Media Asia, CTCorp, Media Indonesia, Rajawali Corpora, and Indigo Multimedia. All TV stations are from Jakarta, which broadcasts in 22 to 32 Indonesian provinces. 11 Network Intelligence Studies Volume VI, Issue 11 (1/2018) METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION The author uses the Broadcasting Act 32 of 2002 on In modern society, TV occupies a significant broadcasting and the Government Decree 50 of 2005 position. All shareholders have an interest in this on the implementation of free to air private TV as a medium. Governments have an interest in TV parameter of substantial TV network. According to because it has political effects (Sakr, 2012), while the regulation, the government requires local TV business people have an interest because they can stations to broadcast locally, except through the benefit from the TV business (Baumann and broadcasting network.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning And/Or Sinking Foreign Fishing Vessels Conducting Illegal Fishing in Indonesia Some Obligations and Loopholes
    asia-pacific journal of ocean law and policy 2 (2017) 174-179 brill.com/apoc Burning and/or Sinking Foreign Fishing Vessels Conducting Illegal Fishing in Indonesia Some Obligations and Loopholes Zaki Mubarok Busro PhD Candidate, Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong [email protected] Indonesia’s abundant marine resources attract not only Indonesian fishermen but also nationals from other countries who fish in maritime zones under In- donesia’s national jurisdiction. When these national and foreign fishermen un- dertake unauthorized fishing operations in Indonesian waters, they are guilty of illegal fishing under Indonesian law. The Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Susi Pudiastuti revealed national data on the illegal operations of foreign vessels and stated that on some days, “over 70 vessels of 50 to 70 gross tons entered Indonesian waters”.1 According to the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (mmaf) Indonesia suffers annual losses amounting to around Rp. 101 trillion (us$ 8.8 million) due to illegal fishing activities including not only losses of tax revenue for the State and income for local fishermen but also the abuse of fuel subsidies.2 Illegal fishermen use fuel allocated for autho- rized Indonesian fishermen and subsidized by the Indonesian Government.3 In order to avoid paying taxes on harvests, illegal fishermen will use counterfeit licenses. These fishermen also employ destructive fishing gears leading to the decline of catch for local fishermen.4 1 Sunan J. Rustam, ‘Legal Review of “Sink the Vessel” Policy’, 6 December 2014, <http://www .thejakartapost.com/news/2014/12/06/a-legal-review-sink-vessel-policy.html#sthash.zY2qA- Wj3.dpuf>.
    [Show full text]
  • Respons Konstitusional Larangan Calon Anggota Dewan Perwakilan
    Respons Konstitusional Larangan Calon Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah sebagai Pengurus Partai Politik Constitutional Response Concerning the Prohibition for Regional Representative Council Candidates as Political Party Officials Pan Mohamad Faiz dan Muhammad Reza Winata Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara Mahkamah Konstitusi Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No.6, Jakarta E-mail: [email protected] dan [email protected] Naskah diterima: 27/03/2019 revisi:07/08/2019 disetujui: 20/08/2019 Abstrak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 30/PUU-XVI/2018 bertanggal 23 Juli 2018 menjadi salah satu putusan penting bagi desain lembaga perwakilan di Indonesia. Dalam Putusan tersebut, MK menyatakan bahwa pengurus partai politik dilarang menjadi calon anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. Namun, tindak lanjut dari Putusan ini memicu polemik ketatanegaraan. Sebab, terjadi kontradiksi mengenai waktu pemberlakuan larangan tersebut akibat adanya perbedaan pemaknaan terhadap Putusan MK di dalam Putusan MA, PTUN, dan Bawaslu. MK menyatakan bahwa Putusannya berlaku sejak Pemilu 2019. Akan tetapi, Putusan MA, PTUN, dan Bawaslu tersebut menyatakan larangan tersebut berlaku setelah Pemilu 2019. Artikel ini mengkaji kontradiksi Putusan-Putusan tersebut doktrindengan menggunakanresponsivitas terhadap tiga pisau putusan analisis, pengadilan yaitu: (1) finalitasdari Tom putusan; Ginsburg, (2) artikel respons ini menyimpulkanterhadap putusan; bahwa dan Keputusan(3) validitas KPU atau yang keberlakuan tetap kukuh norma. memberlakukan Dengan menggunakan larangan bagi pengurus
    [Show full text]
  • Mahkamah Agu Mahkamah Agung Republik Indo
    Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id PUTUSAN Nomor 33 P/HUM/2017 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH AGUNG Mahkamah AgungMemeriksa dan mengadili Republik perkara permohonan keberatan Indonesia hak uji materiil terhadap Peraturan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia (DPD RI) Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Tertib, pada tingkat pertama dan terakhir telah memutuskan sebagai berikut, dalam perkara: 1. Ir. ANANG PRIHANTORO, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal RT. 003 RW. 003 Kelurahan Nambahdadi, Kecamatan Terbanggi Besar, Kabupaten Lampung Tengah, Provinsi Lampung, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; 2. MARHANY VICTOR POLY PUA, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal RT. -/RW 008 Kelurahan Kairagi Dua Kecamatan Mapanget Kota Manado, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; 3. DJASARMEN PURBA, S.H. kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal Jl. Kaktus Giwang No. 2A Sukajadi RT/RW: 003/001 Batam, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014- Mahkamah Agung2019; Republik Indonesia 4. AM. IQBAL PAREWANGI, S.SI, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal Jl. Datuk Patimang No. 47 RT/RW: 006/003, Desa La’Latang, Kec. Tallo, Kota, Makassar, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; 5. HI AHMAD JAJULI S.IP, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, Jl. Sisinga Mangaraja No. 56 LK2, RT/RW: 012/-, Desa Gedong Air, Kecamatan Tanjung Karang Barat, Kota Bandar Lampung, Provinsi Lampung, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; Selanjutnya memberi kuasa kepada : 1. Dr. A. Irmanputra Sidin, S.H., M.H.; 2. Iqbal Tawakkal Pasaribu, S.H.; 3. Hermawanto, S.H.,M.H.; 4. Victor Santoso Tandiasa, S.H., M.H.; Mahkamah Agung5. Agustiar, Republik S.H.; Indonesia Halaman 1 dari 53 halaman.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indonesian Presidential Election: Now a Real Horse Race?
    Asia Pacific Bulletin EastWestCenter.org/APB Number 266 | June 5, 2014 The Indonesian Presidential Election: Now a Real Horse Race? BY ALPHONSE F. LA PORTA The startling about-face of Indonesia’s second largest political party, Golkar, which is also the legacy political movement of deposed President Suharto, to bolt from a coalition with the front-runner Joko Widodo, or “Jokowi,” to team up with the controversial retired general Prabowo Subianto, raises the possibility that the forthcoming July 9 presidential election will be more than a public crowning of the populist Jokowi. Alphonse F. La Porta, former Golkar, Indonesia’s second largest vote-getter in the April 9 parliamentary election, made President of the US-Indonesia its decision on May 19 based on the calculus by party leaders that Golkar’s role in Society, explains that “With government would better be served by joining with a strong figure like Prabowo rather more forthcoming support from than Widodo, who is a neophyte to leadership on the national level. Thus a large coalition of parties fronted by the authoritarian-minded Prabowo will now be pitted against the the top level of the PDI-P, it is smaller coalition of the nationalist Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), which had just possible that Jokowi could selected former vice president Jusuf Kalla, nominally of Golkar, as Jokowi’s running mate. achieve the 44 percent plurality If this turn of events sounds complicated, it is—even for Indonesian politics. But first a look some forecast in the presidential at some of the basics: election, but against Prabowo’s rising 28 percent, the election is Indonesia’s fourth general election since Suharto’s downfall in 1998 has marked another increasingly becoming a real— milestone in Indonesia’s democratization journey.
    [Show full text]
  • CAS Final.Pdf
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Asian Studies Review in March 2015, available online: http://criticalasianstudies.org/issues/vol47/no1/contesting-tobacco-control-policy-in- indonesia.html Contesting Tobacco Control Policy in Indonesia by Andrew Rosser University of Adelaide [email protected] Submitted to Critical Asian Studies October 2014 Draft Only. Not for citation. Abstract Over the past decade and a half, the Indonesian government has progressed fitfully and inconsistently towards a stricter tobacco control policy regime albeit without much impact on the country’s worsening tobacco epidemic. The author explains this pattern of reform in terms of the unequal but changing relationship of power between tobacco companies and tobacco farmers, on the one hand, and tobacco control advocates based in NGOs, health professional organizations, universities and international organizations, on the other. The first of these coalitions has had greater structural leverage, better political connections, stronger organizational capacity, greater ability to mobilize popular forces, and more capacity to cultivate a positive public image. But the second coalition has been able to exercise some influence over policy because of changes wrought by democratization. Looking to the future, the author suggests that further progress in Indonesia’s tobacco control policies will be contingent upon an ongoing process of struggle; however, there are signs that the tide is turning in favor of the second coalition. Acknowledgements I wish to thank the Australian Research Council for funding this article through grant number FT110100078 and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economics of Trawl Fisheries in Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea
    Socio-economics of trawl fisheries in Sout ISSN 2070-6103 50 FAO FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS FAO FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS 50 50 Socio-economics of trawl fisheries in Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Trawl Fisheries Socio-economics 26-27 October 2015 Da Nang, Vietnam Socio-economics of trawl and Socio-economic Write-shop 25-26 April 2016 fisheries in Southeast Asia and Cha Am, Thailand Socio-economic surveys were carried out in pilot sites in Papua New Guinea (Gulf of Papua Prawn Fishery), Philippines (Samar Sea), Papua New Guinea Thailand (Trat and Chumphon) and Viet Nam (Kien Giang) under the project, Strategies for trawl fisheries bycatch management (REBYC-II CTI), funded by the Global Environment Facility and executed by FAO. In Indonesia, no study was conducted owing to the ban on trawl Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Trawl Fisheries Socio-economics fisheries beginning January 2015. However, a paper based on key 26-27 October 2015 informant interviews was prepared. The socio-economic studies were Da Nang, Viet Nam undertaken to understand the contribution of trawl fisheries to food and security and livelihoods and determine the potential impacts of Socio-economic Write-shop management measures on stakeholder groups. Among the 25-26 April 2016 socio-economic information collected were the following: Cha Am, Thailand demographic structure of owners and crew; fishing practices – boat, gear, season, duration; catch composition, value chain and markets; contribution to livelihoods, food security and nutrition; role of women; heast Asia and Papua New Guinea costs and income from trawling; catch/income sharing arrangements; linkages with other sectors; and perceptions – resources, participation, compliance and the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Majalah Majelis Edisi April 2018 Akan Fax.: (021) 57895237 Pun Sudah Membuka Pendaftaran Untuk Bakal Mengupas Persoalan Ini
    Daftar Isi EDISI NO.04/TH.XII/APRIL 2018 39 SELINGAN 78 Profil Roehana Koeddoes Okky Asokawati Pengantar Redaksi ...................................................... 04 10 BERITA UTAMA Opini ................................................................................... 06 Mencari Caleg Berintegritas Kolom ................................................................................... 08 Seyogyanya seorang caleg memiliki integritas dan Bicara Buku ...................................................................... 36 jauh dari perbuatan tercela. Karena setelah Gema Pancasila .............................................................. 38 terpilih ia diharapkan hanya memperjuangkan aspirasi rakyat. Aspirasi Masyarakat ..................................................... 47 Debat Majelis ............................................................... 48 Wawancara ..................................................... 70 Varia MPR ......................................................................... 72 Figur .................................................................................... 74 Ragam ................................................................................ 76 Catatan Tepi .................................................................... 82 18 Nasional Press Gathering: Menikmati Keindahan Taman Nasional Bunaken COVER 63 Sosialisasi Sosialisasi Lewat Pentas Seni Budaya Edisi No.04/TH.XII/April 2018 Kreatif: Jonni Yasrul - Foto: Istimewa EDISI NO.04/TH.XII/APRIL 2018 3 PENASEHAT Pimpinan MPR-RI
    [Show full text]
  • AICIS2019 Programme.Cdr
    th Annual International AICIS 19 CONFERENCE 2019 ON ISLAMIC STUDIES DIGITAL ISLAM, EDUCATION, AND YOUTH Changing Landscape of Indonesian Islam The 19th Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies Programme Mercure Jakarta Batavia 1-4 October 2019 1 JAKARTA th Annual International AICIS 19 CONFERENCE 2019 ON ISLAMIC STUDIES DIGITAL ISLAM, EDUCATION, AND YOUTH Changing Landscape of Indonesian Islam The advancement of communication and information and computerized aids to Qur'anic recital and technologies, especially the Internet and social media, has Arabic learning, are available in the marketplace, become one of the most crucial factors in informing the recent side-by-side with various more conventional ones, dynamics and manifestations of Muslim politics all over the such as trendy, colourful jilbab, Muslim T-shirts, world. Competition over religious symbols and interpretations perfumed oils, and veiled Barbie dolls. as well as institutions that control them, which constitutes the Paradoxically, rising curve of expanded digital main feature of Muslim politics, has often taken place via the media does not necessary give rise to a civil Internet and social media and closely tied to the ways in which pluralism that accepts and legitimates diversities. In information, ideas and discourses are shared, communicated, some cases the digital media helps militant Islamic and produced. The growth of new modes of interactive groups carry out violent mobilization for the communication has allowed Muslims to increasingly interest of their own. The eruption of Islamic participate in global Islamic discourses. Although the digital militancy tide in the post-Suharto Indonesia, for media does not necessarily call the so-called public sphere into instance, confirms such an ambivalent role of the being, it contributes significantly to reshaping a sense and digital media.
    [Show full text]