Welfare in Transition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Welfare in Transition Welfare in Transition The Political Economy of Social Protection Reform in Indonesia Maryke van Diermen Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts University of Adelaide December 2017 Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint award of this degree. I give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Signature of candidate: Date: 10/07/18 ii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support I have received from many people. I am thankful to them all but I wish to mention some in particular. Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors, Andrew Rosser and Susan Hemer, for their encouragement and immense knowledge. Andrew’s guidance and knowledge has helped me enormously in the research and writing of this dissertation. I am deeply grateful for Andrew’s generosity: he has regularly spent hours discussing issues or ideas with me. Susan’s advice on conducting fieldwork was extremely helpful and, whilst writing up, her encouragement was often what kept me going. I had additional support from Kanishka Jayasuriya in my first year, and I’m also grateful for his advice. Furthermore, this thesis could not have been completed without the financial assistance provided through the Australian Postgraduate Award and ongoing support from the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies at the University of Adelaide. I would also like to thank Alison-Jane for proofreading the dissertation. My sincere thanks to the SMERU research institute. During my fieldwork, their kindness and friendship was extensive. I was privileged to meet and learn from many remarkable researchers during this time. In particular, I would like to thank, Pak Asep, Ibu Hestuti, Ibu Nuning, and Isma. I would also like to thank the international researchers who I had the pleasure of getting to know during this time, including Sarah, Ranjan, and Laura. In addition, to the many people who allowed me to interview them, thank you for giving up your time and sharing your insights. To the wonderful people I have shared an office with over the last few years, thank you for sharing your coffee, stories, knowledge, and smiles. In particular, I would like to thank Tess and Rupananda for patiently listening to my ideas and issues and for their friendship. I would also like to thank Dave, Concetta, Elise, Anthony, Shoshannah, Mustafa, Paloma, Tait, Margy, Bill, and Henrike for their friendship and support. I was so lucky to share this experience with such a knowledgeable and friendly group of fellow post-graduate students. iii Moving beyond the world of academia, I would like to thank my friends for the fun times over the last few years. Thank you for making sure I was still my very social self. I am also very thankful to my housemates and boyfriend. I enjoyed coming home to shared dinners, endless banter, and tea towel whipping competitions. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my wonderful family. My parents, Carina and Peter, who provided me with endless encouragement and love. I am deeply grateful. My Mum has been a great emotional support, a wonderful sounding board, and often sent me home with several meals for the week (sorry about your missing Tupperware containers). I am very grateful for my Dad’s advice, enthusiasm, and always knowing how to lift my spirits. I would like to thank my sisters, Aimee and Bianca, who have also been great emotional supports, and always make me laugh. iv Abstract There has been significant reform in social protection systems in developing countries in recent years. The extent, nature, and timing of such reform has varied significantly both between countries and within countries between sectors. Most scholars have explained these developments in terms of technical issues of design, implementation, finance or administration rather than political dynamics. However, recognition is growing that these varying patterns of reform and their implications for improving social protection need to be understood in terms of the underlying political context. This dissertation aims to contribute in this respect by examining the political dynamics surrounding social protection reform in Indonesia. I begin the dissertation by advancing a framework for analysing the politics of social protection reform in developing countries, drawing on ‘social conflict’ theory. Applied to social protection reform, this approach entails identifying the actors, interests, and agendas at work in relation to social protection; assessing the relationships of power between them; analysing the way these shift over time; and how this translates into differing levels of ability to influence policy and its implementation. Having developed this analytical framework, I examine the politics of social protection in Indonesia during the New Order (1965-1998) and post-New Order periods (1998-the present), focusing on three sectors: food security, social security and income support. I put forward two broad arguments. First, I argue that the nature of Indonesia’s social protection system has changed slightly over time. Specifically, I argue that the country’s social protection system has gone from being productivist, particularist, unequalising, informal and predatory in nature under the New Order, to remaining productivist and predatory, but becoming more universalist, equalising, and formal in nature during the post-New Order period. The principal change has been the expansion of rights and coverage of social protection in Indonesia, a shift relevant to the particularist-universalist dimension of social protection. Yet, change has varied across different sectors. Reform has been strongest in the case of income support and social security, and weakest in the case of food security. v Second, I argue that the above continuities and shifts in the nature of Indonesia’s social protection system are a product of the country’s political and social order. Specifically they have reflected: i) continued control by predatory political, bureaucratic and corporate elites nurtured under the New Order over the state apparatus in the post-New Order period; ii) the increasing power of donors and technocrats in policy-making between 1997-2003, during which their advice and funding were required to ease the crisis; iii) the increased power of politicians and political parties to promote social protection policies to help them foster political support and, in turn, secure votes at election time following democratisation; and iv) the expanding power of popular forces to access, contest, and influence social protection policy following democratisation. I conclude by discussing the implications of this analysis for proponents of social protection reform in the developing world. In this respect, I make four recommendations. First, proponents of social protection reform should focus their activities on areas where the prospect of change is greatest. Second, international organisations should provide increased funding and intellectual support to NGOs and unions. Third, proponents of social protection reform should coordinate their efforts as their influence has been greatest when they have acted collectively. Fourth, supporters of social protection reform should pursue strategies for ensuring that social protection programs circumvent bureaucratic involvement. vi Table of Contents DECLARATION .................................................................................................................... II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... III ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ V LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................X LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. XI GLOSSARY ....................................................................................................................... XII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 Purpose of the Dissertation ........................................................................................................................ 5 Argument .................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Indonesia 2010 ORGANISATION for ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION and DEVELOPMENT
    OECD Investment Policy Reviews INDONESIA OECD Investment Policy Reviews Indonesia has undertaken a decade of political and economic reform, under very diffi cult circumstances. Democracy is now fi rmly established, and the economy is growing at a steady pace in spite of the global fi nancial crisis. Reforms over the past decade have done much to improve the resilience of the Indonesian economy, and the INDONESIA government has made substantial progress in creating a better climate for investment. New laws have been enacted in almost all sectors, and new institutions have been created to advise the government, implement and enforce laws, regulate newly liberalised sectors and settle disputes. Foreign investors have taken notice. Foreign direct investment in Indonesia in the past fi ve years has exceeded the earlier peak achieved in 1996, before the Asian fi nancial crisis in 1997-98 brought economic contraction and net outfl ows of foreign investment. This investment is also becoming increasingly diversifi ed by sector and by country of investor. OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Indonesia charts Indonesia’s progress in developing an effective policy framework to promote investment for development. It focuses INDONESIA Reviews Policy Investment OECD on policies towards investment, competition, infrastructure, fi nance and other areas of the business environment and suggests ways the climate for both domestic and foreign investment might be further improved. In the same series China Egypt India Morocco Peru Russian Federation I Viet Nam DN The full text of this book is available on line via this link: www.sourceoecd.org/finance/9789264087002 Those with access to all OECD books on line should use this link: www.sourceoecd.org/9789264087002 SourceOECD is the OECD online library of books, periodicals and statistical databases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Government Policy in Indonesian Small and Medium Enterprise Development, 1966 - 2006
    The Role of Government Policy in Indonesian Small and Medium Enterprise Development, 1966 - 2006 Greta Christine Seibel Supervisors: Janet Hunter (LSE) & Anne Booth (SOAS) A thesis submitted to the Department of Economic History of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, February 2020 i Declaration of Authorship I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). I further declare: The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. In accordance with the Regulations, I have deposited an electronic copy of it in LSE Theses Online held by the British Library of Political and Economic Science and have granted permission for my thesis to be made available for public reference. Otherwise, this thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe the rights of any third party. The thesis contains 78,855 words (excluding bibliography). Statement of inclusion of previous work Some of the comparative work with South Korea and Taiwan builds on the ideas developed in my Master thesis, submitted to the London School of Economics and Political Science in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Deputy Minister Position?
    Number 161 • July 2020 i 5th and 6th Floor, Constitutional Court Building Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta Pusat ii Number 161 • July 2020 Number 161 • July 2020 DIRECTING BOARD: Anwar Usman • Aswanto • Arief Hidayat Editorial Greetings Enny Nurbaningsih • Wahiduddin Adams Suhartoyo • Manahan MP Sitompul Saldi Isra • Daniel Yusmic Pancastaki Foekh DIRECTOR: rials at the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (Mahkamah M. Guntur Hamzah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia or “MK RI”) continue to be conducted by EDITOR IN CHIEF: Timplementing health protocols related to Covid-19. The enthusiasm of the Heru Setiawan litigants remains high. Likewise, the Constitutional Court Justices remain active and enthusiastic in leading the trials. Many new cases are presented, while the DEPUTY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: old cases are in the revision trials until it is time for the hearing by experts as well Fajar Laksono Suroso as the publication of statements from state institutions. MANAGING EDITOR: Towards the end of June 2020, the Constitutional Court has also held Mutia Fria Darsini oral sentence pronouncements for judicial reviews, such as for the Fiduciary EDITORIAL SECRETARY: Guarantee Law (UU Jaminan Fidusia), Traffic and Transportation Law (UU Lalu Lintas Tiara Agustina dan Angkutan Jalan or “UU LLAJ”), Position of Notary Law (UU Jabatan Notaris) and EDITOR: others. Meanwhile, the cases that are still on trial until mid-July 2020 and has Nur Rosihin Ana not yet been decided are the Corruption Eradication Commission Law (UU Komisi Nano Tresna Arfana • Lulu Anjarsari P Pemberantasan Korupsi or “UU KPK”), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU Informasi dan T ransaksi Elektronik or “UU ITE”, the Criminal Code REPORTER: Procedures (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana or “KUHAP”), and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Economic Relations with Kazakhstan, 2015 – 2017
    THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INDONESIA ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY: STRENGTHENING ECONOMIC RELATIONS WITH KAZAKHSTAN, 2015 – 2017 Nida Sabila Firdaus 016201505010 President University A Thesis presented to the Faculty of Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Bachelor Degree in International Relations Concentration in Diplomacy Studies 2019 ABSTRACT This thesis aims to discuss explicitly the economic interests of Indonesia to Kazakhstan. By focusing on foreign policy and economic diplomacy strategies carried out by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Indonesia in Kazakhstan in the period of 2015 to 2017. This research uses qualitative data analysis conducted deductively. The method used in research to collect data is by analyzing documents from primary sources and interview with the related sources. The theoritical framework of this study consists of Neo-Liberalism, Mutual Interdependence, Bilateral Relations, and Economic Diplomacy. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia by using its economic diplomacy can achieve the national interests in economic sector and can be keen to see the economic opportunities that exist in Kazakhstan. This is indicated by the positive results in the trade sector between Indonesia and Kazakhstan in 2018 which reached 6,822.9 USD. Meanwhile the trade data from 2015 to 2017 showed a deficit which amounted to -10,566.2 USD (2015), -7,769.9 USD (2016), -22,321.0 USD (2017). Keywords : Indonesia, Kazakhstan, foreign economic policy, bilateral relations, economic diplomacy iv ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas secara eksplisit tentang kepentingan ekonomi Indonesia dalam melihat peluang di negara Kazakhstan. Dengan berfokus pada kebijakan luar negeri dan strategi diplomasi ekonomi yang dilakukan oleh Kementerian Luar Negeri Indonesia dengan Kazakhstan di periode 2015 sampai 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Meetings of the Boards of Governors Summary
    THE WORLD BANK GROUP THE WORLD BANK GROUP GROUP BANK A 2009 WORLD THE Headquarters 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. NNUAL Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Telephone: (202) 473-1000 Facsimile: (202) 477-6391 Website: www.worldbank.org M EETINGS THE WORLD BANK GROUP OF THE B OARDS Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized OF NNUAL EETINGS SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY 2009 A M G OVERNORS OF THE OARDS OF OVERNORS B G Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2009 Summary Proceedings Istanbul, Turkey October 6–7, 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 7052-CH00_FM_pi-viii.pdf 4/15/10 7:20 AM Page i THE WORLD BANK GROUP 2009 ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THE BOARDS OF GOVERNORS SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS Istanbul, Turkey October 6–7, 2009 7052-CH00_FM_pi-viii.pdf 4/15/10 7:20 AM Page ii 7052-CH00_FM_pi-viii.pdf 4/15/10 7:20 AM Page iii INTRODUCTORY NOTE The 2009 Annual Meetings of the Boards of Governors of the World Bank Group, which consists of the International Bank for Reconstruc- tion and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC), International Development Association (IDA), Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) and International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), held jointly with that of the International Monetary Fund, took place on October 6–7, 2009 in Istanbul, Turkey. The Honorable Nguyen Van Giau, Governor of the Bank and the Fund for Vietnam served as the Chairman. The Summary Proceedings record, in alphabetical order by member countries, the texts of statements by Governors, the resolutions and reports adopted by the Boards of Governors of the World Bank Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Content
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Elites and economic policies in Indonesia and Nigeria, 1966-1998 Fuady, A.H. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Fuady, A. H. (2012). Elites and economic policies in Indonesia and Nigeria, 1966-1998. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 Chapter 6 Elites and Industrialization Policy Industrialization has been regarded as a major factor contributing to divergent economic development in Asia and Africa. This has also been a feature of Indonesia–Nigeria comparisons since the 1980s. Since the mid- 1980s, the manufacturing sector has been an engine of growth in Indonesia. Contribution of the sector to the country‟s GDP increased significantly, from 8 percent in 1965 to 29 percent in 2003 (World Bank, 2007b).
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Apart
    Growing Apart Growing Apart Oil, Politics, and Economic Change in Indonesia and Nigeria peter m. lewis the university of michigan press Ann Arbor Copyright © by the University of Michigan 2007 All rights reserved Published in the United States of America by The University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid-free paper 2010 2009 2008 2007 4321 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lewis, Peter, 1957– Growing apart : oil, politics, and economic change in Indonesia and Nigeria / Peter M. Lewis. p. cm. — (Interests, identities, and institutions in comparative politics) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-472-09980-1 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-472-09980-9 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-472-06980-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-472-06980-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Indonesia—Economic conditions—1945– . 2. Nigeria— Economic conditions—1970– . 3. Indonesia—Economic policy. 4. Nigeria—Economic policy. I. Title. HC447.L47 2007 330.9598—dc22 2006025449 For Tamara Contents Acknowledgments ix Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. The Political Economy of Development 28 Chapter 3. Growing Apart Divergent Political Economies 54 Chapter 4. Indonesia Crisis, Reform, and Growth 86 Chapter 5. Nigeria Division, Distribution, and Decline 125 Chapter 6. Comparing Economic Performance 180 Chapter 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicts Between State and Business in the Nationalization of PT. Inalum
    International Conference on Social and Political Issues (ICSPI 2016) International Conference on Social and Political Issues (the 1st ICSPI, 2016) “Knowledge and Social Transformation” Volume 2018 Conference Paper Conflicts Between State and Business in the Nationalization of PT. Inalum Alim Bathoro Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia Abstract This study discusses the dispute between state and capitalist class. State consists of local government elite and central government elite. Local elite consists of 10 regents/mayors in Lake Toba region and Asahan River basin, while the central elite are President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Coordinating Minister for the Economy Hatta Rajasa, Minister of State-Owned Enterprises Dahlan Iskan, Minister of Industry MS Hidayat as well as Leaders and Members of Commissions VI & IX of the House of Representatives Republic of Indonesia. Meanwhile the capitalist class is represented by Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan and Association for Mineral Entrepreneur Indonesia Received: 19 March 2018 (APEMINDO). This research aims to clarify underlying factors of dispute between state Accepted: 27 July 2018 and capitalist class in the nationalization of PT. Indonesian Asahan Aluminum (Inalum) Published: 29 August 2018 which implies to conflict among elites. Publishing services provided by This study uses qualitative method by analyzing research findings with the Theory Knowledge E of State Autonomy proposed by Ralp Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas as the main Alim Bathoro. This article is perspective. While the theory of conflict and consensus by Maswadi Rauf, authority distributed under the terms of of elite theory by C. Wright Mills, theory of decentralization by Vedi R. Hadiz, theory of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which oligarch’s power by Jeffrey A.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesian Technocracy in Transition: a Preliminary Analysis*
    Indonesian Technocracy in Transition: A Preliminary Analysis* Shiraishi Takashi** Indonesia underwent enormous political and institutional changes in the wake of the 1997–98 economic crisis and the collapse of Soeharto’s authoritarian regime. Yet something curious happened under President Yudhoyono: a politics of economic growth has returned in post-crisis decentralized, democratic Indonesia. The politics of economic growth is politics that transforms political issues of redistribution into problems of output and attempts to neutralize social conflict in favor of a consensus on growth. Under Soeharto, this politics provided ideological legitimation to his authoritarian regime. The new politics of economic growth in post-Soeharto Indo- nesia works differently. Decentralized democracy created a new set of conditions for doing politics: social divisions along ethnic and religious lines are no longer suppressed but are contained locally. A new institutional framework was also cre- ated for the economic policy-making. The 1999 Central Bank Law guarantees the independence of the Bank Indonesia (BI) from the government. The Law on State Finance requires the government to keep the annual budget deficit below 3% of the GDP while also expanding the powers of the Ministry of Finance (MOF) at the expense of National Development Planning Agency. No longer insulated in a state of political demobilization as under Soeharto, Indonesian technocracy depends for its performance on who runs these institutions and the complex political processes that inform their decisions and operations. Keywords: Indonesia, technocrats, technocracy, decentralization, democratization, central bank, Ministry of Finance, National Development Planning Agency At a time when Indonesia is seen as a success story, with its economy growing at 5.9% on average in the post-global financial crisis years of 2009 to 2012 and performing better * I would like to thank Caroline Sy Hau for her insightful comments and suggestions for this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archipelago Economy: Unleashing Indonesia's Potential
    McKinsey Global Institute McKinsey Global Institute The archipelago economy: Unleashing Indonesia’s potential Unleashing Indonesia’s economy: The archipelago September 2012 The archipelago economy: Unleashing Indonesia’s potential The McKinsey Global Institute The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), the business and economics research arm of McKinsey & Company, was established in 1990 to develop a deeper understanding of the evolving global economy. Our goal is to provide leaders in the commercial, public, and social sectors with the facts and insights on which to base management and policy decisions. MGI research combines the disciplines of economics and management, employing the analytical tools of economics with the insights of business leaders. Our micro-to-macro methodology examines microeconomic industry trends to better understand the broad macroeconomic forces affecting business strategy and public policy. MGI’s in-depth reports have covered more than 20 countries and 30 industries. Current research focuses on six themes: productivity and growth, financial markets, technology and innovation, urbanisation, labour markets, and natural resources. Recent research has assessed the diminishing role of equities, progress on debt and deleveraging, resource productivity, cities of the future, the future of work in advanced economies, the economic impact of the Internet, and the role of social technology. MGI is led by three McKinsey & Company directors: Richard Dobbs, James Manyika, and Charles Roxburgh. Susan Lund serves as director of research. Project teams are led by a group of senior fellows and include consultants from McKinsey’s offices around the world. These teams draw on McKinsey’s global network of partners and industry and management experts. In addition, leading economists, including Nobel laureates, act as research advisers.
    [Show full text]
  • Kunci Jawaban
    Sri Mulyani [KUIS TOKOH INDONESIA] www.tokohindonesia.com KUNCI JAWABAN Kuis tentang Sri Mulyani http://www.tokohindonesia.com/kuis/sri_mulyani/ 1. Sri Mulyani menjabat sebagai Menteri Negara PPN/Kepala Bappenas Kabinet Indonesia Bersatu menggantikan Jawaban: Kwik Kian Gie 2. Sri Mulyani menyandang tiga jabatan menteri dalam kurun waktu kurang dari empat tahun Jawaban: Benar 3. Menurut Sri Mulyani, ada tiga faktor penggerak pertumbuhan ekonomi, yaitu Jawaban: Fiskal, konsumsi, dan investasi 4. Saat ditunjuk Presiden SBY sebagai pelaksana tugas Menteri Koordinator Perekonomian menggantikan Boediono yang terpilih menjadi Gubernur Bank Indonesia, Sri Mulyani merangkap jabatan sebagai Menteri Keuangan Jawaban: Benar 5. Sebelum diangkat menjadi menteri dalam Kabinet Indonesia Bersatu Sri Mulyani berkarir di dunia internasional sebagai konsultan sebuah lembaga milik Pemerintah Amerika Serikat yang bernama Jawaban: US Aid 6. Tahun 2002-2004, Sri Mulyani menjadi perempuan Indonesia pertama yang menjabat sebagai Direktur Eksekutif IMF untuk Asia Pasifik menggantikan Dono Iskandar Djojosubroto Jawaban: Salah Yang benar adalah Direktur Eksekutif IMF untuk Asia Tenggara 7. Sri Mulyani sempat aktif menjadi penasihat pemerintah bersama sejumlah ekonom terkemuka lain dalam wadah Dewan Ekonomi Nasional (DEN) pada era pemerintahan Jawaban: Abdurrahman Wahid 8. Saat bermukim dan bekerja di Amerika Serikat, Sri Mulyani banyak melakukan riset dan menulis buku dengan topik Dampak Krisis Perekonomian Global Indonesia Jawaban: Salah Yang benar adalah Krisis Ekonomi dan Implikasi pada Pengelolaan Utang Publik 9. Agustus 2001, nama Sri Mulyani menghilang dari peredaran di dalam negeri dan hijrah ke sebuah ibukota negara bagian Amerika Serikat (AS) yaitu Jawaban: Atlanta, Georgia tokohindonesia.com | Terbaik, terlengkap dan terpadu tentang biografi para tokoh di Indonesia Sri Mulyani [KUIS TOKOH INDONESIA] www.tokohindonesia.com 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Pencatatan Produk Sekuritisasi Pendapatan Tol Jagorawi
    Pencatatan Produk Sekuritisasi Pendapatan Tol Jagorawi Image not found or type unknown Jakarta - Saat ini, Pemerintah Indonesia mempunyai 245 proyek dan dua program di Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN) dengan total investasi yang dibutuhkan mencapai Rp4.197 triliun. Dari kebutuhan tersebut, yang bisa dialokasikan dari Anggaran dan Pendapatan Belanja Negara (APBN) hanya Rp 525 triliun, dari BUMN/BUMD sebesar Rp 1.258 triliun dan dari Swasta diharapkan bisa menutupi kebutuhan pembiayaan sebesar Rp 2.414 triliun. Oleh karena itu, Pemerintah sangat mendukung munculnya instrumen-instrumen baru terutama yang berasal dari pasar modal, salah satunya melalui sekuritisasi aset yang dilakukan oleh BUMN. "Pemerintah sangat mendukung upaya untuk menghidupkan berbagai macam instrumen pembiayaan yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan jangka panjang atau menengah", ungkap Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Darmin Nasution saat menghadiri Pencatatan Perdana Efek Beragun Aset Mandiri JSMR01 - Surat Berharga Hak atas Pendapatan Tol Jagorawi (EBA Kelas A), Kamis (31/8), di Jakarta. Turut hadir dalam acara tersebut Presiden Joko Widodo, Menteri Keuangan Sri Mulyani, Menteri Badan Usaha Miliki Negara (BUMN) Rini Soemarno, Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Basuki Hadimuljono, Menteri Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Kepala Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Bambang Brodjonegoro, Gubernur Bank Indonesia Agus Martowardojo, Ketua Dewan Komisioner Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Wimboh Santoso, Direktur Utama PT Bursa Efek Indonesia Tito Sulistio dan perwakilan kementerian/lembaga terkait. Darmin menyampaikan pemerintah sangat mendukung upaya untuk menghidupkan berbagai macam instrumen pembiayaan yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan jangka panjang atau menengah. Efek Beragun Aset (EBA) ini merupakan salah satunya. EBA merupakan Efek yang diterbitkan oleh Kontrak Investasi dengan portofolio terdiri dari aset keuangan. Sekuritisasi adalah transformasi aset yang tidak liquid menjadi liquid dengan cara pembelian Aset Keuangan dari Kreditor Asal dan penerbitan Efek Beragun Aset.
    [Show full text]