Dynamics of Political Development in Afghanistan Dynamics of Political Development in Afghanistan the British, Russian, and American Invasions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dynamics of Political Development in Afghanistan Dynamics of Political Development in Afghanistan the British, Russian, and American Invasions Dynamics of Political Development in Afghanistan Dynamics of Political Development in Afghanistan The British, Russian, and American Invasions Hafizullah Emadi dynamics of political development in afghanistan Copyright © Hafizullah Emadi, 2010. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2010 978-0-230-10389-4 All rights reserved. First published in 2010 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN® in the United States—a division of St. Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Where this book is distributed in the UK, Europe, and the rest of the world, this is by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-28833-5 ISBN 978-0-230-11200-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230112001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. A catalogue record of the book is available from the British Library. Design by Scribe Inc. First edition: September 2010 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Dedicated to the memory of my brother Habibullah. Contents List of Tables viii Preface ix Acknowledgments xi Chronology xiii Introduction 1 1 Reform and Rebellion in Postindependence 11 2 Dawn of Political Liberalization 49 3 Military Putsch and Regime Change 87 4 State, Imperialism, and Dissident Movements 127 5 Mujahidin, Civil War, and the Taliban 167 6 Post-Taliban Politics of Reconstruction 205 Glossary 249 Notes 253 Bibliography 267 Index 277 Tables 2.1 U.S. and USSR loan and economic assistance, 1949–1972 (in millions of dollars) 84 3.1 U.S. and USSR economic assistance to Afghanistan, 1973–1977 (in millions of dollars) 96 4.1 Major Sunni political parties in the 1980s and 1990s 137 4.2 Major Shia Islamic parties in the 1980s and 1990s 145 4.3 Chronology of worker strikes, 1968 149 4.4 Chronology of student strikes, 1968 151 4.5 Major revolutionary organizations active in Afghanistan’s politics 153 6.1 Results of presidential election, October 9, 2004 217 6.2 Results of parliamentary election, September 18, 2005 219 Preface Since the formation of Afghanistan as a nation in the early eighteenth century, the state apparatus was touted as an institution that serves the interest of all people regardless of their social and class affiliations, however, it ignored the needs of tribal and ethnic communities in favor of serving the interests of the ruling class. The class character of the state and its dependence on alien powers for political, financial, and military support eroded the legitimacy of the state and its leader- ship. Since then, conflicts of interest among Pashtun rulers has led to the formation of political alliances with imperial powers for sup- port against their rivals; this factor paved the way for British interven- tion in Afghanistan. The British supported and installed rulers who defended their interests and deferred to them—a situation that lasted until Afghanistan gained its independence in 1919. Nonetheless, Brit- ish influence, both direct and indirect, continued in the country’s political affairs, manifested in support of authoritarian and despotic leaders supportive of its policies. In the post–World War II period, the emerging superpowers—the United States and the Soviet Union—set out to carve their own spheres of influence in Afghanistan by provid- ing economic and technical assistance as well as political support to individuals and groups within and outside the state bureaucracy that supported their politics and ideologies. The Soviet Union succeeded in establishing its domination over Afghanistan after its cliental party, Hizb-e-Demokratik-e-Khalq-e- Afghanistan (People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan [PDPA]), seized power in a military coup in April 1978 that facilitated the Soviet occupation of the country in December 1979 and spawned the anti-Soviet war of national liberation. The Soviets continued to support the Kabul client regime after their defeat and withdrawal of troops in 1989 and until the disintegration of the Soviet empire in 1991. A lack of Russian financial and military support led to the col- lapse of the PDPA’s rule and establishment of a theocratic state in x Preface 1992. Islamic fundamentalists fought each other for domination of the country’s political institutions—a war that claimed the lives of thousands of innocent men, women, and children, destroyed civil and political institutions and economic infrastructures, displaced thou- sands of people inside the country, and forced many others to seek refuge in the neighboring countries of Iran and Pakistan and else- where. This situation continued until U.S. and NATO forces toppled the Taliban in late 2001 and backed the establishment of a cliental political system of governance. This study is a modest attempt to examine how dependent devel- opment and struggles for power within the state apparatus led to the formation of alliances with imperial powers and how the latter used these alliances to manipulate political development in Afghani- stan to their own advantage. It also demonstrates how the failure of imperial powers to build a hegemonic project around a class faction within the state apparatus paved the way to their direct intervention in Afghanistan’s internal affairs—British engagement in Afghanistan prior to the country’s independence in 1919, Russian occupation in the 1980s, and U.S. and NATO military intervention in late 2001. Acknowledgments As an advocate of social justice and a member of the political move- ment for progressive social transformation in the 1970s and after, I became interested in the dynamics of political development in Afghanistan, with a view to affect positive change in the trend of development and produce relevant literature to serve as a guide to novice students of political science and the progressive movement in their struggle for justice. This study is a product of many years of intensive reading, research, and observation of developments in Afghanistan in the era of globalization of the capitalist system. With- out the assistance and support of friends it would not have been possible to complete this book. I would like to express my deep- est gratitude to Mohamed Alibhai for his thoughtful comments on the final version of this book. I would also like to render thanks to Farooq Babrakzai for his cogent suggestions and comments on vari- ous aspects of development in his home country. I am equally grate- ful to Abbas Noyan, representative at the Shura-e-Milli (National Assembly) for sharing information on political developments during the legislative process. Most especially I thank my sisters Nigar and Sanam and my late brother Habibullah, School Superintendent in the Shibar district, Bamiyan Province, and their families who pro- vided me with round-the-clock support during my stay in Afghani- stan, which helped me focus on my research and writing. This study was also enhanced by the special part played by Khodayar Faiyaz, a distinguished figure in the liberation movement in Shibar, Bamiyan Province, in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Appreciation is expressed for the role played by Shah Mohammad Rais and Iraj Mohammad Rais of Shah Mohammad Book Company for providing me access to their collections and research materials during my stay in Kabul. It is impossible to express sufficiently my thanks to Lorilei, who con- sistently provided moral and material support during my research, locating and accessing materials in library archives and preparing an xii Acknowledgments index for the book—she did everything she could and always more than I asked. Last, but not least, I am particularly grateful to Pal- grave Publishers for bringing this study of Afghanistan’s politics and society to a wider audience. Chronology 1747 Ahmad Shah Abdali of the Sadozai Pash- tun tribe is enthroned as king and rules Afghanistan for twenty-six years. 1773 Death of Ahmad Shah Abdali and succes- sion of his son Timur to the throne. Timur transfers the capital from Qandahar to Kabul and rules twenty years. 1798 Britain’s containment policy toward Afghanistan deters Afghanistan from invading India. 1809 British envoy Mountstuart Elphinstone and King Shuja conclude a defensive pact that heralds the beginning of direct con- tact between Afghanistan and Britain. 1818 Armed confrontation among the Pashtun ruling elites leads to the outbreak of civil unrest that lasts until 1835. 1826 Dost Mohammad, of the Mohammadzai Pashtun tribe and ruler of Ghazni, seizes Kabul. 1839 First Anglo-Afghan War. The British install ex-king Shuja to power. 1841, December 23 British envoy Sir William Hay Macnaghten is assassinated in Kabul. 1842 End of the First Anglo-Afghan War. 1843, December Dost Mohammad seizes power and rules the country for twenty years. xiv Chronology 1857 An Anglo-Afghan treaty is concluded in Peshawar and the British agree to provide subsidy to Dost Mohammad. 1863, June 9 Dost Mohammad dies and Shir Ali seizes power. 1866 Mohammad Afzal seizes power; Shir Ali flees to Qandahar. 1867 Mohammad Afzal dies and is succeeded by his brother Mohammad Azam. 1869 Shir Ali regains power. 1878 Second Anglo-Afghan War. 1879 King Shir Ali dies and is succeeded by his son Mohammad Yaqoob. Yaqoob abdi- cates the throne when the British invade Kabul. 1880 The British recognize Abd al-Rahman after he ascends to the throne. 1893 Britain and Afghanistan sign the Durand Line Treaty, demarcating the southern boundaries between Afghanistan and British-controlled India. 1901 Death of Abd al-Rahman and succession of his son Habibullah to the throne.
Recommended publications
  • Emperor Of! Japan Pm Zahir Watches "Inspecter
    ' ' V.I Hi- ; ' KABIRI & CO. LTD NAWROZ CARPET 'A n Biggest exporters of Afghan EXPORT CO, s t; PHi rri handicrafts offering' the best quality Afghan products at: displays highest quality newold H rugs, genuine antlqae arms, po. Ac n osteenchas and ' other Afghan iahlR tbuTIQtE: ' ' ' Address; ::Charahi '.Ansarl (Share handicrafts: . v A A r:AA's A Address: Share Nau opposite h.!u;i v i 30189 '.":!"30183. Blue Mosque . J -- "'";.-- . Teh: and ? .( , n If '..''i''"'"-.- I Post Box; .406. Tela: 32035 and 31051. AA Cable. PUST1NCHA Cable: Nawroz-Kabul- . VOL. XN0.125 KABUL, THURSDAY, AUGUST 19, 1971 (ASAP 28, 1350 PRICE AF. 4 HM SENDS Royal audience ; " ' KABUL, Augv 'ig;;. '(Bakhitar) . p MESSAGE TO During' the ' week ending to--(2 I'! dajf, (Hrs'esty the received, in audience, the foll-- v EMPEROR owing,, according to a Royal if 4 ft-- ; 'I Protocol Depaijtmen(t (announ-- OF! JAPAN cement: ; Senate President Abdul Hadi . K i KABUL, Aug. 19, (BMakhtar). , , Dawi.' National Defence Mi-- - friendly . message t from v y r histet General' Khan Moham-- i Ills Majesty the King of Afgba mad, ' Interior MjAister 1 Aman-- ; nistan was presented to the ullah ' Mansuri, Justice wMinis-- Emperor of Japan last week. a Argha-- , ter Mohammad Anwar f aa presentation Minis-te- r, The was made , . ndiwal,; .Public, Works v, by the Afghan Ambassador to Gen. Khwazak Zamai, Mi-- A Tokyo, .. Sayed Kassem Rlshtya, nister,. portfolio,. j, Mrs. 4 without ' through . ' ' the Minister of State . Shafiqa Ziayee,; minister with- - and acting Foreign Minister, ';iout portfolio Abdul ' Sattar" Si- - ' ';: Toshio Kimufa, , ,. , ' i rat, Justice Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Sikhs and Hindus
    Country Policy and Information Note Afghanistan: Sikhs and Hindus Version 5.0 May 2019 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to Financial Sanctions: Afghanistan 01.02.21
    ANNEX TO NOTICE FINANCIAL SANCTIONS: AFGHANISTAN THE AFGHANISTAN (SANCTIONS) (EU EXIT) REGULATIONS 2020 (S.I. 2020/948) AMENDMENTS Deleted information appears in strikethrough. Additional information appears in italics and is underlined. Individuals 1. ABBASIN, Abdul Aziz DOB: --/--/1969. POB: Sheykhan village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan a.k.a: MAHSUD, Abdul Aziz Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref): AFG0121 (UN Ref): TAi.155 (Further Identifying Information): Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for nonAfghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/View-UN-Notices- Individuals click here. Listed On: 21/10/2011 Last Updated: 31/12/2020 01/02/2021 Group ID: 12156. 2. ABDUL AHAD, Azizirahman Title: Mr DOB: --/--/1972. POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Nationality: Afghan National Identification no: 44323 (Afghan) (tazkira) Position: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref): AFG0094 (UN Ref): TAi.121 (Further Identifying Information): Belongs to Hotak tribe. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 29 Jul. 2010. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/ Notices/View-UN-Notices- Individuals click here. Listed On: 23/02/2001 Last Updated: 31/12/2020 01/02/2021 Group ID: 7055. 3. ABDUL AHMAD TURK, Abdul Ghani Baradar Title: Mullah DOB: --/--/1968.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ABDUL ZAHIR, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 05-1623 (RWR) GEORGE W. BUSH et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM ORDER Petitioner Abdul Zahir, a detainee at Guantanamo Bay, has moved under Section I.E.2 of the Case Management Order ("CMO") for an order allowing him to propound to the respondents 84 numbered interrogatories, many containing multiple sub-parts, and eight requests for production of documents. The respondents oppose Zahir's requests, arguing that they are overbroad, that they exceed the scope of discovery that was contemplated by Section I.E.2 of the CMO, and that Zahir fails to make the necessary showing that granting his requests would produce evidence material to the lawfulness of Zahir's continued detention. Because Zahir does not support several of his requests by showing how the requested discovery will enable him to rebut the factual basis for his detention, his motion for leave to file those requests will be denied. However, because the respondents do not show how answering several of Zahir's UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE -2­ requests would be unfairly disruptive or burdensome to them, Zahir's motion for leave to propound those requests will be granted. BACKGROUND Zahir has been a detainee at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba ("Guantanamo") since b(1 ) The respondents allege in their amended factual return that for approximately three years before the Taliban fell from power in December 2001, Zahir "worked closely as the translator and trusted assistant of a senior al-Qaida commander in Afghanistan" named Abdul Hadi aI-Iraqi ["al-Hadi"], who was purportedly al­ Qaida's "commander in northern Kabul," and that Zahir "assisted in the management of al-Qaida guesthouses, procurement of supplies and funding for al-Qaida's fighters, coordination of al­ Qaida and Taliban military activities, and the handling of money for al-Qaida-sponsored activities." (See Amended Factual Return, Ex.
    [Show full text]
  • BETWEEN PATRONAGE and REBELLION 1. the 1960S and 1970S
    AFGHANISTAN RESEARCH AND EVALUATION UNIT Briefing Paper Series Dr Antonio Giustozzi February 2010 BETWEEN PATRONAGE AND REBELLION Student Politics in Afghanistan Contents Introduction 1. The 1960s and Student politics is an important aspect of politics in most countries 1970s ...................1 and its study is important to understanding the origins, development and future of political parties. Student politics is also relevant to elite 2. Post-2001: A different formation, because elites often take their first steps in the political arena environment .......... 4 through student organisations. In Afghanistan today, student politics 3. Post-2001: moves between two poles—patronage and rebellion—and through its Patronage and study we can catch a glimpse of the future of Afghan politics. Careerism ............. 6 Student politics in Afghanistan has not been the object of much 4. Post-2001: Rebellion scholarly attention, but we know that student politics in the 1960-70s Surging................12 had an important influence on the development of political parties, which in turn shaped Afghanistan’s entry into mass politics in the late 5. Conclusion and 1970-80s. The purpose of this study is therefore multiple: to fill a gap Implications ..........15 in the horizon of knowledge, to investigate the significance of changes Annex: Summary of in the student politics of today compared to several decades ago, and Cited Organisations ...16 finally to detect trends that might give us a hint of the Afghan politics of tomorrow. The research is based on approximately 100 interviews About the Author with students and political activists in Kabul, Herat, Mazar-i-Sharif and Jalalabad, as well as approximately 12 interviews with former Dr Antonio Giustozzi is student activists of the 1960-70s.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Information on Jihadist Websites the Second Half of May 2016
    ICT Jihadi Monitoring Group PERIODIC REVIEW Bimonthly Report Summary of Information on Jihadist Websites The Second Half of May 2016 International Institute for Counter Terrorism (ICT) Additional resources are available on the ICT Website: www.ict.org.il This report summarizes notable events discussed on jihadist Web forums during the second half of May 2016. Following are the main points covered in the report: The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan announces the death of its leader, Mullah Akhtar Mansour, as a result of a US drone strike, and the appointment of the organization’s new leader, Mawlawi Hibatullah Akhundzada. As a result of the announcement, members of the Emirate and some Al-Qaeda branches give eulogies in Akhtar Mansour’s memory. Meanwhile, members of the Taliban in Afghanistan swear allegiance to the new leader of the Emirate. Abu Muhammad al-‘Adnani, the spokesman for the Islamic State, calls on supporters of the organization to help it carry out terrorist attacks on western soil using any means and provides permission for the killing of all civilians in the west. In addition, al-‘Adnani accuses rebel factions in Syria, including Al-Nusra Front, of joining the infidel forces and collaborating with the US and coalition forces. Abu Abdullah al-Shami, a member of Al-Nusra Front’s Shura Council, accuses the US of foiling the Syrian revolution and supporting the Alawite regime. According to him, this trend only serves to encourage the organization’s fighters to keep fighting. In addition, al-Shami calls on all jihad factions in Syria to continue jihad until they achieve their goals.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN Detention and Killing of Political Personalities
    AFGHANISTAN Detention and killing of political personalities 1. Introduction Up to 200 Afghan political personalities have been arrested in the past year apparently on account of their peaceful political activities and opposition to the continued armed conflict in the country. Those arrested include Afghan intellectuals, community leaders, former army officers or civil servants. The vast majority of the detainees are reportedly non-combatants arrested solely for their activities in support of peace and a broad based government in Afghanistan. Most of these detainees have reportedly been severely tortured. Over a dozen of them have been killed after their arrest. Some of the detainees have been released but as of February 1999, around 100 still remain in detention. This report covers the period between early 1998 and early 1999 and deals specifically with human rights violations against Afghan political personalities in southern and eastern Afghanistan. Amnesty International has dealt with human rights violations in other parts of the country in earlier reports. The information in this report is from interviews with former detainees or those with detailed personal knowledge of these arrests and killings. Amnesty International wishes to reiterate that it neither supports nor opposes any of the warring factions, that its concerns about human rights abuses in Afghanistan is based on its mandate and the principles of international human rights and humanitarian law. Amnesty International has highlighted human rights violations in Afghanistan for more than two decades, including throughout the Soviet invasion and as well as under the respective administrations of Zahir Shah and of former presidents Davoud, Taraki, Amin, Karmal, Najibullah, Mujaddedi, and Rabbani.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance
    Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs May 12, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21922 Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Summary The capacity, transparency, and legitimacy of Afghan governance are considered crucial to Afghan stability as U.S.-led NATO forces turn over the security mission to Afghan leadership. The size and capability of the Afghan governing structure has increased significantly since the Taliban regime fell in late 2001, but the government remains weak and rife with corruption. The government has slowly widened its writ, even though substantial powers are concentrated in the elected presidency through powers of appointment at all levels. President Hamid Karzai has served as president since late 2001; he is constitutionally term-limited and will leave office after the conclusion of presidential and provincial elections the first round of which took place on April 5, 2014. Several major figures registered to run for president, and many of their slates included faction leaders long accused of human rights abuses. Karzai appeared to tilt toward his longtime confidant and former Foreign Minister, Zalmay Rasoul, but the final, uncertified vote count showed Northern Alliance “opposition” leader Dr. Abdullah Abdullah with nearly 45% of the vote and former Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani with about 31.5%. Abdullah’s total, if certified, is close to but still short of the 50%+ needed for victory. A runoff round is tentatively scheduled for June 7. There are discussions among the major candidates, President Karzai, and other senior figures on a settlement that might avoid the runoff.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance
    Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs November 8, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21922 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Summary The limited capacity and widespread corruption of all levels of Afghan governance are factors in debate over the effectiveness of U.S. policy in Afghanistan and in implementing a transition to Afghan security leadership by the end of 2014. The capacity of the formal Afghan governing structure has increased significantly since the Taliban regime fell in late 2001, but many positions, particularly at the local level, are unfilled. Widespread illiteracy limits expansion of a competent bureaucracy. A dispute over the results of the 2010 parliamentary elections paralyzed governance for nearly a year and was resolved in September 2011 with the unseating on the grounds of fraud of nine winners of the elected lower house of parliament. Karzai also has tried, through direct denials, to quell assertions by his critics that he wants to stay in office beyond the 2014 expiration of his second term, the limits under the constitution. While trying, with mixed success, to build the formal governing structure, Afghan President Hamid Karzai also works through an informal power structure centered around his close ethnic Pashtun allies as well as other ethnic and political faction leaders. Some faction leaders oppose Karzai on the grounds that he is too willing to make concessions to insurgent leaders in search of a settlement—a criticism that grew following the September 20 assassination of the most senior Tajik leader, former President Burhanuddin Rabbani.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan INDIVIDUALS
    CONSOLIDATED LIST OF FINANCIAL SANCTIONS TARGETS IN THE UK Last Updated:01/02/2021 Status: Asset Freeze Targets REGIME: Afghanistan INDIVIDUALS 1. Name 6: ABBASIN 1: ABDUL AZIZ 2: n/a 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. DOB: --/--/1969. POB: Sheykhan village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan a.k.a: MAHSUD, Abdul Aziz Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):AFG0121 (UN Ref): TAi.155 (Further Identifiying Information):Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for non Afghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we- work/Notices/View-UN-Notices-Individuals click here. Listed on: 21/10/2011 Last Updated: 01/02/2021 Group ID: 12156. 2. Name 6: ABDUL AHAD 1: AZIZIRAHMAN 2: n/a 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. Title: Mr DOB: --/--/1972. POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Nationality: Afghan National Identification no: 44323 (Afghan) (tazkira) Position: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):AFG0094 (UN Ref): TAi.121 (Further Identifiying Information): Belongs to Hotak tribe. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 29 Jul. 2010. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/ Notices/View-UN-Notices-Individuals click here. Listed on: 23/02/2001 Last Updated: 01/02/2021 Group ID: 7055.
    [Show full text]
  • Views Were Conducted During Fieldwork in the Summers of 2008 And
    The Role of Media in the Framing of the Afghan Conflict and the Search for Peace A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Roshan Noorzai August 2012 © 2012 Roshan Noorzai. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled The Role of Media in the Framing of the Afghan Conflict and the Search for Peace by ROSHAN NOORZAI has been approved for the School of Media Arts and Studies and the Scripps College of Communication by _____________________________________________ Don M. Flournoy Professor of Media Arts and Studies _____________________________________________ Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii Abstract NOORZAI, ROSHAN, Ph.D., August 2012, Mass Communication The Role of Media in the Framing of the Afghan Conflict and the Search for Peace (306 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Don M. Flournoy This dissertation explores media framing of conflict and peace in post-September 11, 2001 Afghanistan. The media selected for this study included: the BBC Pashto Service and Azadi Radio at the international level; Tehran’s Pashto Radio at the regional level; National Radio and Television of Afghanistan [NRTA], Tolo Television and Ariana Television at the national level; and Salam Watandar Network and Hewad Television at the local level. In-depth interviews were conducted during fieldwork in the summers of 2008 and 2009. Participant observation, textual analysis and documents analysis were the other methods used in this study. Using comparative frame analysis, this study identified the following main frames: state building, occupation as failure and civilian victims.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Before the Invasions: the Subversion of Democracy in 1973
    Afghanistan before the Invasions: The Subversion of Democracy in 1973 Khalida Ramyar A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Graduate Program in Sociology York University Toronto, Ontario May 2015 © Khalida Ramyar, 2015 Abstract Using the Wikileaks PlusD Archive of US State Department cables from Kabul in 1973, this thesis presents an analysis of the politics of the Helmand Water Treaty between Afghanistan and Iran and the role of the US in Afghanistan's politics at the time. The analysis of the cables shows: a) that US policy was directed towards the promotion of neoliberalism in Afghanistan; b) that Afghanistan in 1973 was the site of a largely neglected struggle for democracy, and c) that the US, as well as the Afghan establishment, worked together to suppress this democratic struggle. These broader political dynamics are illustrated through a focus on the Helmand Water Treaty as discussed in the cables. ii Dedication For my love Justin, without whom nothing is possible, and for Cyrus, my little Halfghan, for whom I hope this narrative fills some of the gaps in the road to self-discovery. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank: My supervisors, Tania Das Gupta, and Michael Nijhawan, for giving me a lot of freedom and flexibility, for believing in the story, and for being endlessly helpful. The Graduate Program Director of Sociology when I entered the program, Kathy Bischoping, for giving my application a chance. My family, and especially Mom and Dad, for providing the inspiration to find the truth.
    [Show full text]