Above Left, US Army

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Above Left, US Army U.S. Army U.S. Above left, U.S. Army sol- diers conduct live-fire train- ing on the Combat Outpost Live Fire Range, which falls under control of Joint Multi- national Training Command (JMTC), headquartered in Grafenwoehr, Germany. Above right, SFC Serafin Graciani from the Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC), Timber- wolves Observer-Controller Team, teaches Romanian troops to conduct a search and document evidence in October 2010 in Cincu, Ro- mania. Right, soldiers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team train at the multinational training center for deployment to Afghanistan. The soldiers refined their skills in mounted and dismounted patrols, small unit tactics, military operations in urban terrain, air assault tech- niques, counter-improvised explosive devices and long- range marksmanship. The soldiers also trained with coalition Afghan National Army soldiers during their time at Hohenfels. 72 ARMY I March 2011 oday’s soldiers are combating the deadly impro- vised explosive device (IED), the mountainous and harsh terrain in Afghanistan and a war of wills, which involves more than gaining territory or con- trolling physical terrain. Today’s fight is about gaining trust and winning the hearts and minds of the Afghan people, according to GEN David H. Petraeus, com- mander, International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)/ U.S. Forces-Afghanistan. Fighting today’s war means train- ing soldiers to win the “battle of wits,” while working closely with our international and Afghan partners within a coalition and combined operational environment. About 84 percent of the troop-contributing nations fight- ing alongside U.S. soldiers are from Europe. To ensure that the ISAF commander’s intent is met, U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) boasts the Army’s largest training command outside the continental United States, which provides facili- U.S. Army/SPC Arthur Ruepong Army/SPC U.S. ties using live, virtual, constructive, simulation and gaming assets: the Joint Multinational Training Command (JMTC) By Denver Makle in Grafenwoehr, Germany. It is the only U.S. Army training command that regularly trains U.S. forces with multina- tional partners for deployment and coalition operations in Afghanistan. “We’ve just completed our 17th iteration of operational mentor liaison teams (OMLT) from 24 countries,” said BG Steven L. Salazar, commanding general, JMTC. “More than 6,000 multinational soldiers have been trained here to be mentors. There is a synergy among observer-controllers (O-Cs) who have trained mentors from multiple different nations. I can’t think of a single joint enabler that we have not been able to employ here that you might otherwise be able to employ at another CTC [combat training center]. “One of the advantages we have in Europe is that all of our units are focused on Afghanistan,” BG Salazar said. “These guys are training with the same folks whom they are going to fight with when they go downrange.” The combat training center is located in central Europe. In addition to 57,000 acres of ranges and training areas at the Grafenwoehr Training Area (GTA) and 40,000 acres at the neighboring Hohenfels Training Area (HTA), there are multiple German and American satellite training areas that extend from Schweinfurt to the Alps. Through co-usage agreements with the German military and established maneuver rights areas, training can be ex- panded beyond GTA and HTA. In 2009, the training areas accommodated more than 7,000 people from the 173rd Air- borne Brigade Combat Team and 12th Combat Aviation Brigade for a historic training event, during which two brigades simultaneously prepared for deployment in sup- U.S. Army/Gary L. Kieffer U.S. March 2011 I ARMY 73 SFC Mathew Salinas, JMRC Timberwolves Observer-Controller Team, teaches Roman- ian troops the steps of escalation of force at an established check point in October 2010, at Cincu Forces Combat Training Area. port of counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. “We can bring soldiers a more realis- tic training experience using host-na- tion lands and training areas, which al- low us to expand the training terrain,” said Reinhold Plossner, JMTC maneu- ver coordination officer. Plossner said special agreements with the German military and host-nation government contribute to a more dynamic training Arthur Ruepong Army/SPC U.S. environment. The JMTC provides combat-maneuver train- table. At that time, units prepared for conventional, force- ing in addition to specialized training for special operations on-force warfare, with an emphasis on heavy and mecha- such as high-altitude alpine training and survival training nized gunnery. “In the 1990s, Grafenwoehr saw 12,000 sol- using these maneuver rights areas. diers training per day,” said Cropps, GTA scheduler. “Today “One of the unique aspects of GTA is that we can build a we are fully booked with 3,000.” Cropps noted that al- training event or range based on a unit’s desired training though fewer soldiers train daily, training is more dynamic objectives,” said MAJ Kevin Broadnax, chief of the rota- than ever before. Many ranges have been modified and up- tional exercises branch at JMTC. “For example, a static dated to support current operations and diverse training re- qualification range can be modified to train soldiers on quirements. Today units such as the 170th Heavy Brigade counter-IED [C-IED] tactics, techniques and procedures.” Combat Team (BCT) prepare for a wide spectrum of tasks At GTA, the addition of multinational forces expands and tactics as they prepare for operations. BCTs must be the training value for any unit, offering cultural and lin- trained for force-on-force tactics as well as counterinsur- guistic training in addition to the normal training objec- gency, asymmetric warfare and urban combat. tives, MAJ Broadnax said. Just as the Infantry and Armor branches have combined “We know that current and future fights and threats will their training centers to accommodate maneuver, so, too, require multinational teams to counter them. That is why have the ranges on the GTA combined. Ranges are no we train in a multinational environment nearly every single longer listed as “Bradley,” “Scout” or “Tank” gunnery day at our JMTC training venues,” said COL Curtis J. Car- ranges. They are now scheduled and utilized as multipur- son, chief of JMTC training. “Through the process of sev- pose ranges, where a training element can conduct multi- eral different training and scheduling conferences, includ- ple training scenarios on one range complex. ing U.S. and multinational military attendees, the JMTC is “Upgrading the ranges to allow units to conduct multi- able to turn nearly every large-scale collective training purpose training increases the effectiveness of training by event into multinational training events. The access we allowing units to train several different tasks simultane- have to multinational planners at these conferences makes ously,” said Ernest L. Roth, JMTC maneuver coordination putting together multinational events routine.” officer. Range 118 is probably the range that has undergone Last fiscal year, the JMTC hosted nearly 200 visits, or ap- the greatest transition, said Roth. The 2009 upgrades to proximately 600 diplomats and leaders from all over Eu- GTA’s Range 118 include a five-story shoot house and a rope, Africa, Southeast Asia and the United States. two-story 360-degree live-fire structure, three-dimensional “Here they see firsthand the extensive training provided mannequin-type targets, multiple E-type targets, day-and- for both U.S. and NATO partner nations contributing to night cameras, and a speaker system to provide realistic ISAF,” said COL Michael S. Higginbottom, chief of staff of sound effects during training. the JMTC. “Since Range 118 opened in November 2009, more than 3,000 soldiers have trained on it,” said SFC Daniel Muren, Training for Current Operations the maneuvers branch noncommissioned officer-in-charge. As a former 1st Armored Division master gunner, Ray “The majority of units that request 118 use all of 118. Based Cropps remembers when Bradley fighting vehicles and on lessons learned, we have added a high-explosive box, tanks lined the tank trail, waiting their turn at the gunnery which is a mini impact area for units to fire mortars into during training on the range. Denver Makle serves as the deputy public affairs officer of the “How units train on Range 118, the interim battle area Joint Multinational Training Command. complex, is driven by their commanders,” said SFC Muren. 74 ARMY I March 2011 The training scenario is similar to a real-life mission. ISAF soldiers were at- tacked by the Taliban at their COP in northern Afghanistan in October 2009. The attack left eight soldiers dead and many more injured. The lessons learned from real-world experiences are incor- porated into predeployment training at the training center to ensure that sol- diers master certain skills before they go downrange. Professional Opposing Forces and Specialty Teams Creating a realistic training environ- ment employs the ingenuity of the sol- U.S. Army/SPC Eric Cabral U.S. dier. For example, a replicated village SPC Matthew Benzing of Company D, 1st Battalion, 4th Infantry Regiment, U.S. at HTA is reminiscent of Kunduz, Army Europe, collects biometrics data from a villager using the handheld inter- Afghanistan. During a typical mission agency identity detection equipment system in Zabul Province, Afghanistan, in rehearsal exercise, the concrete build- June 2010. Company D is deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. ings are decorated with traditional rugs and tapestries, and the Pashto “We allow them the flexibility to conduct training based on translations of the names of establishments are prominently their mission essential task lists. We only ensure that the displayed alongside the English words; the streets are filled range can be used the way they want to use it and that it is with people dressed in traditional Afghan garb while a safe.” replicated radio station plays news, songs and commentary.
Recommended publications
  • Rising Concerns Over Regional Conflicts, Global- Ization, Climate
    USAREUR: Building Partner Capacity for the Future ising concerns over regional conflicts, global- ization, climate change, illegal trafficking of By GEN Carter F. Ham people and material, and the proliferation of Commanding General, U.S. Army Europe and Seventh Army weapons of mass destruction are just some of Rthe complex factors undermining stability in Europe. As European militaries prepare for a future of persistent conflict, they look to the United States for leadership. U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) contin- ues to provide this leadership through theater secu- rity cooperation (TSC) activities while transforming to meet emerging threats and security challenges. Today USAREUR is a dy- namic, full spectrum force that is training and leading European land forces for the future. USAREUR’s history is intertwined with the 60- year legacy of the North October 2009 I ARMY 117 Above, SGM Mark Schindler, U.S. Army Europe Opera- tions Directorate, G3 (left), discusses training with CSM Janos Zsoter of Hungary during the annual Conference of European Armies for Noncommissioned Officers. Right, soldiers from 1st Battalion, 4th Infantry, descend a cliff dur- ing a dismounted patrol in Zabul Province, Afghanistan. Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Once focused exclu- sively on the collective defense of its members, NATO has evolved into an alliance committed to out-of-sector opera- tions—ensuring peace and preempting extremists from disrupting global security. USAREUR has also evolved— from a massive force with a largely conventional defensive mission to a smaller, agile and more flexible force that de- ploys from sanctuaries across Europe to conduct full spec- trum operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Selection Process for the Bulgarian Special Forces
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 2019-12 ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE BULGARIAN SPECIAL FORCES Vlahov, Petar Georgiev Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/64090 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE BULGARIAN SPECIAL FORCES by Petar Georgiev Vlahov December 2019 Thesis Advisor: Kalev I. Sepp Second Reader: Michael Richardson Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Form Approved OMB REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED (Leave blank) December 2019 Master’s thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE BULGARIAN SPECIAL FORCES 6. AUTHOR(S) Petar Georgiev Vlahov 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Donna Kovacheva
    DONNA KOVACHEVA 1021 Arlington Blvd., Apt. 833, Arlington, VA 22209 Phones: 202-863-2539; 571-527-7457 E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Translator and interpreter (English - Bulgarian). High quality and quick turnaround! Areas of Expertise: Foreign policy, finance, commerce, military, agriculture, biotechnology, environment, legal, immigration, law enforcement, emergency management, energy security, food safety, arts, journalism, infrastructure, housing, regional development, medical, health care, insurance, etc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Current: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, Sept. 2000 – present Full-time, Executive Assistant to Deputy Executive Vice-President & Vice President, Fellowship Activities U.S. Department of State, Office of Language Services, Aug. 2002 – present Part-time, Contract interpreter (English < > Bulgarian), consecutive, seminar levels Bulgarian Embassy, Washington, DC, Jan. 2012 – present Part-time, Accredited translator and interpreter (English < > Bulgarian) Language Line, CyraCom International, CTS Language Link, Feb. 2005 – present Part-time, Contract interpreter over the phone (English < > Bulgarian) Various companies, 1977 – present Part-time, Contract/Freelance translator (English < > Bulgarian) Past: “Woolcott & Company”, Patent Management Service, Arlington, VA, July – Sept. 2000 Administrative Assistant General Staff of the Bulgarian Armed Forces, MoD, Sofia, Bulgaria, Sept. 1998 – June 2000 Translator, interpreter
    [Show full text]
  • Prerequisites and Approaches to Force Modernization in a Transition Period
    I&S PREREQUISITES AND APPROACHES TO FORCE MODERNIZATION IN A TRANSITION PERIOD Todor TAGAREV he new security challenges in the beginning of the new century and the pace of T technological innovation force politicians and planners around the world to search for ways to modernize military forces while providing for a broader spectrum of missions and tasks. For a country in transition, this search is complicated by severe resource constraints, lack of experience in market environment and relevant organizational culture. Of particular importance is the dynamics of civil-military relations that may hinder appropriate reform efforts.1 This article covers key issues of defense modernization and re-equipment of armed forces, including resource aspects of modernization. It is based almost entirely on the Bulgarian experience in the last three years. Bulgaria is a country in transition that differs from other countries willing to join NATO and the European Union by its excessive military and defense industrial infrastructure, inherited from the recent past. Nevertheless, the focus is on common principles; the analysis of their implementation is supported with specific examples from the experience of the Bulgarian Ministry of Defense. First, defense reform requirements are described and the necessity to introduce a rigorous defense resource management system is rationalized. Secondly, we describe organizational and procedural changes, essential for the creation of a flexible acquisition process, compatible with acquisition systems and practices of NATO and EU member countries. Next, we outline the main elements of the new acquisition planning, listing current priorities and presenting an ongoing force modernization study. The article covers also the role of research and development in modernization, as well as potential national and international cooperation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Electronic Warfare and Short-Range Air Defence 27Th November 2018
    PERSPECTIVES ON ELECTRONIC WARFARE AND SHORT-RANGE AIR DEFENCE 27TH NOVEMBER 2018 12:00 REGISTRATION & COFFEE Russia’s exploitation of the 12:50 CHAIRMAN’S OPENING REMARKS electromagnetic spectrum in Eastern Ukraine and its increasing investment 13:00 SHORT-RANGE AIR DEFENCE CHALLENGES FOR THE UAS THREAT • Overview of UAS technologies and roles within the battlefield into electronic warfare (EW) capability • General aspects & operational perspectives on C-UAS development demonstrates a significant • Tactical & Technical points of view to IPB, detection, elimination challenge to the execution of NATO’s • Optimal C-UAS: lethal or non-lethal? Enhanced Forward Presence initiative. • Examining experimentation conducted by the University of Defence EW capability development reinforces Dr. Ing. Miroslav Kratky, Department of Air Defence Systems, Russia’s anti-access/area-denial University of Defence in Brno approach and allows Russian forces to 13:40 DEFEATING THE THREAT OF UAS IN THE EUROPEAN THEATRE OF OPERATION retain tactical advantage. In addition to • Assessing methods to close the SHORAD capability gap in Europe exploiting jamming techniques, Russian • Integrating CMIC and Stryker vehicles to advance force protection forces have successfully integrated • Evaluating short-term and long-term requirements to detect and intercept UASs for surveillance and assault. By hostile UAS in the European area of responsibility arming drones with explosive devices, Colonel David Shank, Commander of 10th AAMDC, US Army Europe (Subject to Final Confirmation)
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Minister - Biography
    Minister - biography ANU ANGUELOV /ANYU ANGELOV/ MINISTER OF DEFENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Anu Anguelov was born on December 22nd 1942 in Haskovo. In 1966 he graduated from the Higher National Military Artillery School with an engineer’s degree in Radio Electronics and was promoted to his first military rank of Lieutenant. In 1974 he graduated from the “G.S.Rakovski” National Military Academy. In the period 1982 – 1984 he completed a postgraduate specialization course at the General Staff Academy of the Armed Forces of Russia in Moscow. Has a Master’s Degree in Operational, Tactical and Strategic Leadership of the Armed Forces. In 1991 he took a special OSCE officers course at NATO Defence College in Rome, Italy. After his graduation from the Higher National Military Artillery School, he took various commander and staff positions: . 1966 – 1971: Commander of an autonomous platoon; . 1974 – 1980: Deputy-chief of department at the Land Forces Air Defence Command; 1980 – 1982: Brigade Chief of Staff; . 1984 – 1987: Brigade Commander; . 1987 – 1990: Land Forces Air Defence Chief of Staff; . 1990 – 1992: Land Forces Air Defence Commander in Chief; . 1992 – 1994: Deputy Commander in Chief of the Bulgarian Land Forces. In 1994 he was promoted to Lieutenant-General and was appointed Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Bulgarian Armed Forces. From November 1997 to August 2000 Anu Anguelov was Defence Attache of the Republic of Bulgaria to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. From September 2000 to February 2002, he was Commandant of “G.S.Rakovski” National Military Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Xenta Series Radars for Superior Detection and Performance Against Drones and Aerial Targets in Air Defense and Critical Infrastructure Applications
    a8.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 9/2020 International Security and Defence Journal COUNTRY FOCUS: POLAND ISSN 1617-7983 • Dutch-Belgian www.euro-sd.com • Naval Cooperation • Logistic Trucks • Multinational Corps Northeast • Armoured Vehicles from • Equipping Medical Responders Eastern Europe for CBRN Scenarios September 2020 • The Art of Electronic Eavesdropping • European 8x8 Vehicles Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology ELCAN SPECTER® WEAPON SIGHTS Long range. Close up. One sight. Only the ELCAN Specter® DR dual role weapon sight can instantly switch between close-combat battle mode and precision ranged fire mode. It delivers superior capabilities to protect troops – and provide a trusted advantage – across any domain, any challenge, and every mission. RTX.com/ELCAN ©2020 Raytheon Company, a Raytheon Technologies company. 20RIS013_ELCAN_ADLO_210x297.indd 1 8/20/20 3:09 PM Editorial Eastern Mediterranean: Paris Shows Impatience – with Ulterior Motives? In view of Turkey's actions in the Eastern Mediterranean, France announced that it would increase its mili- tary presence there. On closer inspection, Paris is using units of the French armed forces on the ground to take a stand. Two RAFALE B of the 4th Fighter Wing, sent to Cyprus for an exercise from 10 to 12 August, Photo: author made a stopover in Crete on 13 August. A French C-130FR HERCULES tanker aircraft is also present at the Andreas Papandreou air base in Paphos (Cyprus), also in connection with the exercise. The helicopter carrier (PHA) TONNERRE with support material on the way to Beirut was temporarily joined by the frigate LA FAYETTE, which was in Larnaca (Cyprus) as part of a bilateral exercise with the Hellenic Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Armed Forces 2040
    PROGRAM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Future Armed Forces 2040 26 – 27 September, 2017 Sofia, Bulgaria Under the patronage of the Deputy Prime Minister for Public Order and Security and Minister of Defense of the Republic of Bulgaria Mr. Krasimir Karakachanov ORGANIZER: Defense Advanced Research Institute (DARI) of G. S. Rakovski National Defense College PARTNERS: Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) International, South East European Region, AFCEA Sofia Chapter Defense Acquisition Directorate of the MoD Projects Management Directorate of the MoD CONFERENCE VENUE Central Military Club, 7 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria SPONSORS Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Bulgaria NEXTER SYSTEMS Platinum sponsor 2 25 September 2017, Monday 08:00 – 18:00 Arrival and accommodation of the foreign participants 19:00 – 21:00 Icebreaking (Central Military Club) 26 September 2017, Tuesday 08:30 – 09:00 Registration 09:00 – 10:30 Official Panel Moderator Capt. (BGR-N) Prof. Yantsislav Yanakiev, D.Sc. 09:00 – 09:10 Opening remarks of Major General (BGR-A) Grudi Angelov, Commandant of G. S. Rakovski National Defense College 09:10 – 09:20 Key Note Address by Mr. Krasimir Karakachanov, Deputy Prime Minister for Public Order and Security and Minister of Defense of the Republic of Bulgaria 09:20 – 09:30 Address by Lieutenant General Andrey Botsev, Chief of Defense 09:30 – 09:40 Address by Mr. Konstantin Zografov, AFCEA Regional Vice President for South East European Region and AFCEA Sofia Chapter President 09:40 – 10:10 Keynote Speaker Mr. Alan Shaffer, Director NATO Science and Technology Organization Collaborative Support Office: “Future Armed Forces 2040” 10:10 – 10:30 Discussions 10:30 – 11:00 Family Photo and Coffee Break 11:00 – 12:20 First Panel “Security Foresight Analysis 2040 – Global Challenges and Trends” Moderator Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Defence Industry Defence Industry
    BULGARIAN BULGARIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY DEFENCE INDUSTRY Printed by: Classic Design BULGARIANBULGARIAN DEFENCEDEFENCE INDUSTRY Published by the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Bulgaria All data presented in this Catalogue are provided by the respective institutions and 2019 organizations on their own responsibility. BULGARIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY Content 4 - 5. Introduction 6 - 7. Associations 8 - 9. Index of Companies 12 - 13. ARCUS CO 56 - 57. LIREX BG LTD 14 - 15. ARSENAL 2000 JSCO 58 - 59. LUMYCOMP DESIGN LTD. 16 - 17. ARSENAL JSCO. 60 - 61. MARS ARMOR LTD. 18 - 19. AVIONAMS JSC 62 - 63. MTG - DOLPHIN PLC 20 - 21. BIANOR SERVICES EOOD 64 - 65. MUSALA SOFT 22 - 23. BIEM JSC 66 - 67. NIK 47 LTD. 24 - 29. BULGARIAN DEFENCE INSTITUTE 68 - 69. NITI SHC / SHAREHOLDING COMPANY/ 30 - 31. DUNARIT CORP. 70 - 71. OMNITEL OOD 32 - 33. ECOCOMS LTD. 72 - 73. OPTICOELECTRON 34 - 35. ELECTRON CONSORTIUM JSC 74 - 75. OPTIX JSC 36 - 37. ELECTRON PROGRESS EAD 76 - 77. SAMEL-90 38 - 39. EXPAL BULGARIA JSC. 78 - 79. SECURITY SMART SYSTEMS 40 - 41. HIGH-TECH IMS LTD. 80 - 81. SYNERGY SIMULATION & TRAINING LTD. 42 - 43. INTENDANTSKO OBSLUJVANE JSC 82 - 83. TCHERNO MORE CO. 44 - 45. INTERCONSULT BULGARIA 84 - 85. TECHNOLOGICA EAD 46 - 47. INTERNATIONAL ARMORED GROUP 86 - 87. TELESYS LTD. 48 - 49. INTERNATIONAL POWER SUPPLY AD 88 - 89. TEREM SHC 50 - 51. KINTEX SHC 90 - 91. TRANSMOBIL LTD 52 - 53. KONTRAX JSC 92 - 93. VAZOVSKI MASHINOSTROITELNI ZAVODI 54 - 55. LASA ENGINEERING LTD. 94 - 95. VIDEX JSC BULGARIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY Deputy Prime Minister for Public Order and Security and Minister of Defence Minister of Economy The relations between the responsible state authorities, including I am pleased to present the new edition of the Catalogue of the the Ministry of Defense and the defense industry, are oriented Bulgarian Defence Industry ’2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Vigilant and Ready LAND FORCES for Deterrence and Defence
    A BI-ANNUAL PUBLICATION OF ALLIED LAND COMMAND MAGAZINEFALL 2019 EXCLUSIVE CREVAL “New Approach” EXCLUSIVE SACEUR MEET Gen. Wolters COMMENTARY DETERRENCE Through Competition INSIGHTS RUSSIAN EW Capability Vigilant and Ready LAND FORCES for Deterrence and Defence. MAGAZINE MAGAZINE FALL 2019 FALL 2019 contents. Commander´s SACEUR message Gen T od Wolters Prep for TRIDENT JACKAL 19 05 08 The CREVAL “NEW APPROACH” 10 12 Commander´s message The CREVAL “New Approach” CMI and CIMIC Mobile 05 10 24Training Teams CSEL´s message NRDC-ESP Prepares For Meet the 2019 Sergeant 06 12 TRIDENT JACKAL 19 28Yahya Award Recipient CSEL´S biography The 2nd NATO Mountain North Macedonia poised Warfare Conference - to become NATO´s 30th 07 16 BELOW ZERO 30member Meet the new SACEUR Vigilance and Readiness in NATO Land Standardisation 08 General Todd Wolters 20the Land Domain 32Week 2 MAGAZINE FALL 2019 MND-SE the Road to Success 34 RUSSIAN Letter of Cooperation EW capability Georgia Defence Forces 40 48 37 Theatre SABER GUARDIAN 19: Eurocorps: Road to MND-SE & the Road to Readiness Enablement 34Success 44 Russian EW capacity How the Cyber Domain 37rapidly rises 46Supports LAND Operations LANDCOM signs letter of Theatre enablement: A Key cooperation with Georgia to Readiness 40Defence Forces 48 LANDCOM’s Joint Effects Trip Report: and Fires Branch: Current Logisticians in Kiev 42Activities 50 3 MAGAZINE FALL 2019 WELCOME Front Cover: Credit, Latvijas armija- Latvian Soldiers operating the CVRT light reconaissance vehicle during Joint let’s get Response Force training held on Salisbury Plain, UK. Rear Cover: social. Credit, NATO- A British Army Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank lays down a smoke screen during Spring LANDCOM twitter Storm 19, Estonia’s largest annual military exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of Ministers of the Republic of Bulgaria Annual Report 2011 On
    2011 Annual Report on the Status of Defence and the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bulgaria Council of Ministers of the Republic of Bulgaria Sofia, 2012 г. Report on the status of Defence and the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bulgaria 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Defence policy priorities and approaches ................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Defence policy and the security environment ............................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Development and functioning of the MoD as a modern institution of a democratic state ........................................ 4 2.3. MoD transparency and accountability policy .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3.1. Effective management and elimination of conditions for corruption.................................................................... 5 2.3.2. Information policy .................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.3.3. Control and audit activities .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4. Financial resources .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]