Békés-Arad Joint Tourism Marketing Strategy 2011 – 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Békés-Arad Joint Tourism Marketing Strategy 2011 – 2018 Hungary – Romania Cross-Border Co-operation Programme 2007-2013 “Organization of Thematic Tourism Programmes in the Körös Valley” HURO/0901/241/2.1.3. BÉKÉS-ARAD JOINT TOURISM MARKETING STRATEGY 2011 – 2018 Lead Partner: Mid-Békés Territorial Development Municipal Association Partners: Körös Valley Nature Park Association; National Council of Romanian Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises - Arad Branch 1 www.kozepbekes.hu; www.imm-arad.ro; www.korosoknaturpark.hu www.huro-cbc.eu; www.hungaryromania-cbc.eu Table of Contents I I. Introduction..........................................................................................................................4 I.1. The necessity of tourism marketing strategy...................................................................4 I.2. The introduction of the HURO/0901/241/2.1.3 - „Active tours” project............................5 I.2.1. The objectives and the effects of the project............................................................6 I.3. The objectives of the joint marketing strategy....................................................................8 II. Status analysis of the project target region..........................................................................11 II.1. Introduction of the Mid-Békés Centre .............................................................................11 II.2. Körös Valley Nature Park Association (Körösök Völgye Natúrpark Egyesület)............13 II.3. The trend of inland tourism especially the economic environment, state of natural and cultural life of the Mid-Békés Centre (MBC) area...................................................................18 II.3.1. SWOT analysis of Békés County..............................................................................19 II.3.2. Introduction of the tourism position of the Mid-Békés Centre by a SWOT analysis ...............................................................................................................................................22 II.4. Natural and cultural resources of the Mid-Békés Centre.................................................26 II.4.1. Békéscsaba................................................................................................................33 II.4.2. Gyula.........................................................................................................................43 II.4.3. Békés ........................................................................................................................52 II.4.4. General statements ...................................................................................................61 II.6. The present active tourism possibilities in the MBC region and in the area of Arad County...................................................................................................................................81 III.1.3. Strategic objectives of Békéscsaba......................................................................90 III.1.4. Strategic objectives of Gyula...............................................................................93 III.1.5. The strategic objectives of Békés.........................................................................94 IV. Presentation of the active tourism programme packages ...................................................95 IV.1. Tourism routes in mid-Békés......................................................................................96 IV.2. Tourism routes in Arad county.................................................................................104 IV.2.1. The Mures-valley ..............................................................................................104 IV.2.2. Zarand mountains..............................................................................................105 IV.2.3. Fehér (White)-Körös..........................................................................................107 IV.2.4. Codru-Moma mountains....................................................................................109 IV.2.5. Arad and its surrounding....................................................................................110 V. Basis of the marketing communication in the project ’Active Tours’ .............................111 V.1. SWOT analysis of the project ...................................................................................111 V.2. Aims and methods of marketing activity of the tourism programmes in the project.113 V.3. Marketing communication for the project „Active Tours” .......................................126 V.3.1. Target group – target market – positioning: experimental adventures and active wellness ..........................................................................................................................128 2 www.kozepbekes.hu; www.imm-arad.ro; www.korosoknaturpark.hu www.huro-cbc.eu; www.hungaryromania-cbc.eu V.3.2. Marketing communications in the project period ..............................................137 V.3.3. Further possible marketing channels in the sustaining period. ..........................140 V.3.4. Demand for human resource in the project and the sustaining period ...............143 VI. Planned budget of the active tourism routes, their market pricing .................................143 VII. Conclusions....................................................................................................................144 Annex- Image designs of brochure, website, roll-up boards presenting the programme packages .................................................................................................................................146 3 www.kozepbekes.hu; www.imm-arad.ro; www.korosoknaturpark.hu www.huro-cbc.eu; www.hungaryromania-cbc.eu I I. Introduction I.1. The necessity of tourism marketing strategy The Körös Valley and its natural values like the River Maros (Mureş), the mountains of Zarand, the neighbourhood of Arad, which are situated in Békés and Arad counties, are very little or not appreciated neither in Hungary nor in Romania from the point of view of tourism. The present tourism marketing strategy tries to solve this problem with the objective of introducing and popularizing the natural values of the two counties, an active way of spending free time and the tourism opportunities provided by the nature to the local inhabitants and the incoming tourists. In Békés county there have already been significant investments, facilities have been built to provide service for the active tourism, however, the practical implementation, the wide range of tourism possibilities based on the built infrastructure and the organizing and offering of programs is still missing. The tourism possibilities of Arad county – the hiking routes in the mountains of Zarand, Beli and Gajna, in the valleys of the rivers Fehér-Körös (Crişul Alb) and Maros (Mureş), in the wine region of Menes and the hiking routes in the neighbourhood of Arad – are not easily accessible because of the lack of information. The present marketing strategy after outlining the present situation declares the guiding principles and possibilities that would allow organizing, communicating and implementing of active tourism programs in the two counties, on one hand giving incentive to the organizations dealing with tourism to introduce wider range of offers and popularize our natural values and inland tourism and on the other hand defining those marketing tools that can help to reach the local inhabitants and arriving tourists. The strategy is part of the “Organization of Thematic Tourist Programmes in the Körös Valley” (HURO/0901/241/2.1.3. – Active Tours) project funded by the Hungarian- Romanian Cross-Border Co-operation Programme. The marketing activities are essential 4 www.kozepbekes.hu; www.imm-arad.ro; www.korosoknaturpark.hu www.huro-cbc.eu; www.hungaryromania-cbc.eu elements of the project so that the region could conduct the proper communication, the increase of reputation and the creation of the regional image. I.2. The introduction of the HURO/0901/241/2.1.3 - „Active tours” project On the 1st of November the Mid-Békés Territorial Development Municipal Association in partnership with the Körös Valley Nature Park Association and National Council of Romanian Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises - Arad Branch started the project entitled “Organization of Thematic Tourism Programmes in the Körös Valley” (HURO/0901/241/2.1.3.), which is funded by the Hungarian-Romanian Cross-Border Co- operation Programme. The objective of the Lead Partner, the Mid-Békés Territorial Development Municipal Association is to promote the socio-economic and cultural development of the three member towns - Békéscsaba, Gyula and Békés – and the Mid-Békés Centre (MBC). A coordinated development strategy needs to be carried out and the preparation and implementation of joint regional development programs are needed to fulfill the objective. One of the common development directions of the three towns is tourism based on the cultural and natural values of the region and the funded project gives great incentive to that, since the goal of the project is to let the Körös Valley become a well-known, popular and active tourist destination for inland and foreign tourists – with organization and coordination considering the natural and environmental sustainability. In the frame of the project that has a total cost of 113.653 € (almost 32 million HUF) with 5% own contribution fifteen active tourist roads will be implanted
Recommended publications
  • Administraţia Bazinală De Apă Mureş
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAŢII Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş CUPRINS Abrevieri ................................................................................................................................... 4 Cap. 1: Prezentarea generală a bazinului hidrografic Mureș .................................................. 6 Cap. 2: Riscul la inundaţii în bazinul hidrografic Mureş ....................................................... 14 2.1. Descrierea lucrărilor existente de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ............................. 14 2.2. Descrierea sistemelor existente de avertizare - alarmare şi de răspuns la inundaţii ............................................................................................ 43 2.3. Istoricul inundaţiilor .................................................................................................... 51 2.4. Evenimentele semnificative de inundaţii ..................................................................... 53 2.5. Zone cu risc potențial semnificativ la inundații ........................................................... 55 2.6. Hărți de hazard și hărți de risc la inundații .................................................................. 59 2.7. Indicatori statistici ....................................................................................................... 63 Cap. 3: Descrierea obiectivelor
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunal-7-2019.Pdf
    07C / 2019 Das Magazin des Österreichischen KOMMUNAL Gemeindebundes GEMEINDEN.GESTALTEN.ÖSTERREICH. KOMMUNALMESSE Schwere Maschinen, tropische Tempera- turen, Massen von Besuchern - Bilder einer Ausstellung ab Seite 16 IMPULS 2019 Österreichs innova- tivste Gemeinde ist gefunden Seite 22 „Die Gemeinden zeigen, wie’s geht“ Am Gemeindetag in Graz legten die Gemeinden der Bundespolitik kommunale Tugenden ans Herz: nachhaltiges Wirtschaften, vorausschauendes Denken und verantwortungsbewußtes Planen. ab Seite 6 Österr. Kommunalverlag, 1010 Wien, Löwelstr. 6 ISSN: 1605-1440 Einzelverkaufspreis: EUR 4,90 Einzelverkaufspreis: Retouren an Postfach 100, 1350 Wien Österreichische Post AG MZ 02Z032902 M Sie haben das öffentliche Projekt. Wir haben das Know- 1.300 how. Gemeinden vertrauen uns bawagpsk.com MAKD19084E_Public_Inserat_2019_215x280_190617_1430_RZ.indd 1 17.06.19 15:44 MEINUNG GEMEINDETAG „NICHTS GEHT OHNE Sie haben das DIE GEMEINDEN“ öffentliche Projekt. m 66. Österreichischen Gemeindetag in Graz haben sich dieses Mal rund 2500 Bürgermeisterinnen und Bürgermeister sowie Gemeindevertreter und Bedienstete versammelt und damit ein starkes Zeichen der Einigkeit und des Miteinanders gesetzt. Dass die Gemeinden das Rückgrat unserer NUTZEN WIR DIE Demokratie sind und in dieser Republik nichts ohne uns geht, wissen wir AUFMERKSAMKEIT Wir Aschon lange. Die Spitzen der Staates, von Bundespräsident Alexander Van der Bellen, Bundeskanzlerin Brigitte Bierlein, bis zu Nationalratspräsident Wolfgang Sobotka und FÜR DAS THEMA Landeshauptmann Hermann Schützenhöfer haben in ihren Ansprachen die Rolle und NACHHALTIGKEIT, Bedeutung der Kommunen für die Entwicklung unseres Landes und der Regionen klar und deutlich hervorgestrichen und die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Gemeindebund ge- UM DIE VON UNS würdigt. In der Geschichte der Gemeindetage ist es schon etwas Einzigartiges, dass die GESETZTEN haben obersten drei Repräsentanten der Republik gleichzeitig anwesend sind und den 2096 Gemeinden damit ihre Wertschätzung ausdrücken.
    [Show full text]
  • Restrictii De Capacitate
    DOCUMENTUL DE REFERINTA AL RETELEI CFR - 2022 ANEXA 26 SECȚII ȘI STAȚII CU RESTRICȚII DE CAPACITATE Valabilitate: 12.12.2021 – 11.12.2022 Versiune: 11.0.2 Actualizare: 07.06.2021 Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate “CFR” S.A. România 1) Secții cu restricţii de capacitate Procent/ Durata Încadrare/ Secţia Distanţa Perioada Observaţii (zile) Categorie restricţie (conf. L 202/2016) Un fir de circulaţie închis, iar 200 Barzava - Conop 25.09.2017 – 14.06.2022 1723 B (Z > 7 zile; Y ≥ 30%) pe firul rămas în circulaţie viteza maximă este 50 km/h Un fir de circulaţie închis, iar 200 Conop - Milova 01.03.2019 – 14.06.2022 1201 B (Z > 7 zile; Y ≥ 30%) pe firul rămas în circulaţie viteza maximă este 50 km/h Un fir de circulaţie închis, iar 200 Milova- Radna 05.07.2021 – 08.03.2023 611 B (Z > 7 zile; Y ≥ 30%) pe firul rămas în circulaţie 50 km/h restricție de viteză 200 Barzava - Milova 09.06.2022 – 14.06.2022 6 C (Z ≤ 7zile; Y ≥ 50%) Inchidere totală Un fir de circulaţie închis, iar 200 Barzava - Milova 14.06.2022 – 08.03.2023 267 B (Z > 7 zile; Y ≥ 30%) pe firul rămas în circulaţie 50 km/h restricție de viteză Un fir de circulaţie închis, iar 200 Radna- Paulis 14.06.2022 – 08.03.2023 267 B (Z > 7 zile; Y ≥ 30%) pe firul rămas în circulaţie 50 km/h restricție de viteză Un fir de circulaţie închis, iar 200 Ilteu - Savarsin 21.04.2021 – 10.06.2022 415 B (Z > 7 zile; Y ≥ 30%) pe firul rămas în circulaţie 50 km/h restricție de viteză Un fir de circulaţie închis, iar 200 Savarsin - Varadia 19.08.2021 – 10.06.2022 295 B (Z > 7 zile; Y ≥ 30%) pe firul rămas
    [Show full text]
  • The European Association for Flowers and Landscape -AEFP
    Association Européenne pour le Fleurissement et le Paysage / Aisbl Entente Florale Europe 2013 – background and results The European Association for Flowers and Landscape -AEFP The Association Europeenne pour le Fleurissement et le Paysage (AEFP) - the European Association for Flowers and Landscape is an international, non-profit association. The overall aim of the Association today is the social and cultural development and enhancement of the quality of life of urban dwellers, primarily through landscape development and horticulture. To support its aims, the Association organises an international competition known as Entente Florale Europe in order to promote a greener and more pleasant environment in European towns and villages and to establish international contacts among the participants. Entente Florale Europe - The Competition The competition Entente Florale Europe is the principal means through which the AEFP achieves its aims. In the year 2013, eleven member countries have participated giving a total of 8 villages and 10 towns/cities to the competition. An international jury consisting of 11 members carried out an ‘in situ’ assessment of the candidate town/city and village. Criteria The international jury – each member country providing a representative- assesses the candidate towns and villages according to criteria based on the following considerations: Quality of landscape and vegetation: seasonal and permanent planting of flowers, trees, shrubs; respect for landscape and landscape policies; promotion of biodiversity and ecologically friendly maintenance and management. Quality of natural and built environments including waste management, water management, heritage, quality of streets and buildings and cleanliness. Participation and cooperation by local bodies and organisations. Contribution and role of local statutory authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosonmagyaróvár Und Schüttinsel
    MOSONMAGYARÓVÁR UND SCHÜTTINSEL Szigetköz TDM SZIGETKÖZ Die größte Insel unseres Landes, die von der großen Donau und der Mosoner-Donau umgebene Schüttinsel (Szigetköz) wird MOSONMAGYARÓVÁR nicht zufällig als Geschenk der Donau bezeichnet, denn deren Ablagerungen haben Schüttinsel erschaffen. Die reiche Pflanzen- und Tierwelt erwartet die Naturliebhaber. Die Liebhaber von Wassertouren können die Mosoner Donau, die von Galerie Wäldern UND SCHÜTTINSEL umgeben ist, und die Donau Zweige der wildromantischen Oberen- Schüttinsel durchstreifen, wo die abwechslungsreichen Strecken für die Kajak- und Kanufahrer ein unvergessliches Erlebnis bieten. Die Besucher können an der Mosoner-Donau auch von Promenaden Schiffen oder Passagierdampfern die wildromantische Landschaft bewundern. Die künstlich hergestellten Baggerseen mit Kieselsteinen, die sich neben den Donau Zweigen befinden, versprechen einen guten Fang und machen die Schüttinsel zu einem wahrhaften Angler-Paradies. Die durch die Schüttinsel verlaufende Fahrradstrecke ist ein Teil des internationalen Donau- Radweges (Eurovelo 6), neben der auch der Damm und die Nebenstrassen zum Fahrradfahren geeignet sind. Entlang dieser Strecke können sich die Radfahrer auf angenehmen Rastplätzen über die Natur-und gebaute Schätze der Schüttinsel informieren lassen. Ebenfalls beliebt sind die von den Reithöfen des Gebietes organisierten Reittouren und Kutscherfahrten. In Dunakiliti erwartet ein Neunloch-Golfplatz die Liebhaber dieser Sportart. Auf die Schüttinsel locken – 4-Sterne Wellness Hotels, Privathäuser und Zeltplätze, die alle Ansprüche befriedigen; Restaurants mit guter Küche und vielfältigen Dienstleistungen, die Gäste an. H-9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Magyar u. 9. Tel.: +36 96 206 304 [email protected] www.szigetkozportal.hu Szigetköz TDM 2. Háromtölgy u. 1 SZIGETKÖZ TDM – TOURINFORM Balás Árpád u. Új köztemető Wittmann Antal u. Újhelyi Imre u. 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Magyar u.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maros / Mures Petru Urdea, György Sipos, Tímea Kiss, Alexandru Onaca
    The Maros / Mures Petru Urdea, György Sipos, Tímea Kiss, Alexandru Onaca iver Maros/Mureş is the fourth largest waterflow of the Carpathian Basin after the Danube, Tisa and the Dravarivers. The alluvial fan of the river is among the most Rextensive geographical units of the region. The river itself has a high energy and changes quickly, thus the understanding of actual processes requires compound inves- tigations. Before we start to introduce in detail the past, present and expectable evolution of the lowland section of the river it is important to get an overview on the characteristics of its catchment, its hydrology and the most significant human impacts on the basis of the available literature. The Maros/Mureş is the most significant tributary of River Tisza/Tisa. It drains the water of the Transylvanian Basin into the direction of the Hungarian Great Plains (Fig. 1). Its total length is 769 km, while its so called lowland section from Lipova to Szeged is 175 km. It forms the border between Romania and Hungary on a 22 km sec- tion between Nădlac and Apátfalva. From the remaining length 122 km goes for Roma- nia and 28 km for Hungary. Fig. 1. – page 10 The catchment of the Maros/Mureş The area of the Maros/Mures catchment is approximately 30 000 km2, comprising this way one fifth of the entire Tisza/Tisa catchment. The Maros/Mureş watershed is situ- ated mostly in Romania (92%). In terms of its shape it can be divided into two parts (Laczay 1975). The upstream part is rectangular (250x100 km), while the downstream section starting from Deva is elongated (200x30km) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Falansztertől a Szerethető Otthonig Milyen Az Élet a Fehérvári Lakótelepeken?
    Fehérvár Háromszázmillió Juhász Illésé Ahonnan érdemes a legvirágosabb város! a kórháznak a Pro Theatro díj körbenézni! FEHÉRVÁR Közéleti hetilap 2019.10.10. A falansztertőlA HETILAP a szerethető otthonig Fotó: Kiss László 2 FEHÉRVÁR KÖZÉLET 2019.10.10. A HETILAP Fehérvár a legvirágosabb város! BÁCSKAI GERGELY „Megtisztelő számomra, hogy vá- rosunk képviseletében átvehettem Idén immár huszonhatodik alkalommal, a Virágos Magyarország verseny megújult formában hirdették meg a Virágos fődíját! Ez az eredmény kiváló szak- Magyarország környezetszépítő versenyt. A embereink, zöldprojektjeink, egész Magyar Turisztikai Ügynökség által indított közösségünk törekvésének elisme- kezdeményezés évről évre egyre sikeresebb. A rése!” – mondta Cser-Palkovics városok között ezúttal Székesfehérvár nyerte el András, Székesfehérvár polgár- a fődíjat és képviselheti hazánkat a nemzetközi mestere, miután átvette az elisme- Entente Florale Europe versenyen. rést. – „Fődíjas városként a 2020-as Entente Florale európai virágosítási A verseny idei utolsó program- versenyen Székesfehérvár képviseli jaként múlt pénteken este a majd Magyarországot. De nemcsak Szépművészeti Múzeumban volt emiatt nem dőlhetünk hátra, hiszen az országos díjátadó. Több mint távlati célokban kell gondolkozzunk! háromszázharminc település közül A jövőben is elkötelezettnek kell ma- Székesfehérvár, Orfű és Budapest radnunk a klíma és környezetvédelem V. kerülete nyerte el az idén a Virá- területén!” gos Magyarország környezetszépítő A Magyar Önkormányzati Főker- verseny fődíját, közülük Székes- tész-egyesület díját, Az év főker- fehérvár és Orfű képviselik Magyar- tésze elismerést idén Spanyárné Fotók: Bácskai Gergely országot jövőre az Európai Virágos Halász Szilvia kapta, aki 1992 Városok és Falvak Versenyén, az óta Székesfehérvár főkertésze. A A városok között Székesfehérvár kapta a verseny fődíját Entente Florale Europe megméret- kertészmérnök és környezetvédel- tetésen. mi szakmérnök a Virágos Magyar- ország alapítása óta részt vesz a versenyeken a város.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Name Per 1877 Or Onliine 1882 Gazetteer District
    Hungarian District (jaras) County Current County Current Name per German Yiddish pre-Trianon (megye) pre- or equivalent District/Okres Current Other Names (if 1877 or onliine Current Name Name (if Name (if Synogogue (can use 1882 Trianon (can (e.g. Kraj (Serbian okrug) Country available) 1882 available) available) Gazetteer) use 1882 Administrative Gazetteer Gazetteer) District Slovakia) Borsod-Abaúj- Abaujvár Füzéri Abauj-Torna Abaújvár Hungary Rozgony Zemplén Borsod-Abaúj- Beret Abauj-Torna Beret Szikszó Zemplén Hungary Szikszó Vyšný Lánc, Felsõ-Láncz Cserehát Abauj-Torna Vyšný Lánec Slovakia Nagy-Ida Košický Košice okolie Vysny Lanec Borsod-Abaúj- Gönc Gönc Abauj-Torna Gönc Zemplén Hungary Gönc Free Royal Kashau Kassa Town Abauj-Torna Košice Košický Košice Slovakia Kaschau Kassa Borsod-Abaúj- Léh Szikszó Abauj-Torna Léh Zemplén Hungary Szikszó Metzenseife Meczenzéf Cserehát Abauj-Torna Medzev Košický Košice okolieSlovakia n not listed Miszloka Kassa Abauj-Torna Myslava Košický Košice Slovakia Rozgony Nagy-Ida Kassa Abauj-Torna Veľká Ida Košický Košice okolie Slovakia Großeidau Grosseidau Nagy-Ida Szádelõ Torna Abauj-Torna Zádiel Košický Košice Slovakia Szántó Gönc Abauj-Torna Abaújszántó Borsod-Abaúj- Hungary Santov Zamthon, Szent- Szántó Zemplén tó, Zamptó, Zamthow, Zamtox, Abaúj- Szántó Moldava Nad Moldau an Mildova- Slovakia Szepsi Cserehát Abauj-Torna Bodvou Košický Košice okolie der Bodwa Sepshi Szepsi Borsod-Abaúj- Szikszó Szikszó Abauj-Torna Szikszó Hungary Sikso Zemplén Szikszó Szina Kassa Abauj-Torna Seňa Košický Košice okolie Slovakia Schena Shenye Abaújszina Szina Borsod-Abauj- Szinpetri Torna Abauj-Torna Szinpetri Zemplen Hungary Torna Borsod-Abaúj- Hungary Zsujta Füzér Abauj-Torna Zsujta Zemplén Gönc Borsod-Abaúj- Szántó Encs Szikszó Abauj-Torna Encs Hungary Entsh Zemplén Gyulafehérvár, Gyula- Apoulon, Gyula- Fehérvár Local Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Planul De Management Al Riscului La Inundații Mureș
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAŢII Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureș Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş CUPRINS Abrevieri ................................................................................................................................... 4 Cap. 1: Prezentarea generală a bazinului hidrografic Mureș .................................................. 7 Cap. 2: Riscul la inundaţii în bazinul hidrografic Mureș ....................................................... 14 2.1. Descrierea lucrărilor existente de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ............................. 14 2.2. Descrierea sistemelor existente de avertizare - alarmare şi de răspuns la inundaţii ............................................................................................ 43 2.3. Istoricul inundaţiilor .................................................................................................... 51 2.4. Evenimentele semnificative de inundaţii ..................................................................... 53 2.5. Zone cu risc potențial semnificativ la inundații ........................................................... 55 2.6. Hărți de hazard și hărți de risc la inundații .................................................................. 59 2.7. Indicatori statistici ....................................................................................................... 63 Cap. 3: Descrierea obiectivelor
    [Show full text]
  • Results Booklet 2019
    Results Booklet 2019 GLASLOUGH, CO. MONAGHAN GLASLOCH, CO. MHUINEACHÁIN National SuperValu TidyTowns Winners, 2019 WINNERS TO DATE 1958 Glenties, Co.Donegal 1989 Ardagh, Co.Longford 1959 Glenties, Co.Donegal 1990 Malahide, Co.Dublin 1960 Glenties, Co.Donegal 1991 Malin, Co.Donegal 1961 Rathvilly, Co.Carlow 1992 Ardmore, Co.Waterford 1962 Glenties, Co.Donegal 1993 Keadue, Co.Roscommon 1963 Rathvilly, Co.Carlow 1994 Galbally, Co.Limerick 1964 Virginia, Co.Cavan 1995 Glenties, Co.Donegal 1965 Virginia, Co.Cavan 1996 Ardagh, Co.Longford 1966 Ballyjamesduff, Co.Cavan 1997 Terryglass, Co.Tipperary 1967 Ballyjamesduff, Co.Cavan 1998 Ardagh, Co.Longford 1968 Rathvilly, Co.Carlow 1999 Clonakilty, Co.Cork 1969 Tyrrellspass, Co.Westmeath 2000 Kenmare, Co.Kerry 1970 Malin, Co.Donegal 2001 Westport, Co.Mayo 1971 Ballyconnell, Co.Cavan 2002 Castletown, Co.Laois 1972 Trim, Co.Meath 2003 Keadue, Co.Roscommon 1973 Kiltegan, Co.Wicklow 2004 Lismore, Co.Waterford 1974 Trim, Co.Meath, Ballyconnell, Co.Cavan 2005 Ennis, Co.Clare 1975 Kilsheelan, Co.Tipperary 2006 Westport, Co.Mayo 1976 Adare, Co.Limerick 2007 Aughrim, Co.Wicklow 1977 Multyfarnham, Co.Westmeath 2008 Westport, Co.Mayo 1978 Glaslough, Co.Monaghan 2009 Emly, Co.Tipperary 1979 Kilsheelan, Co.Tipperary 2010 Tallanstown, Co.Louth 1980 Newtowncashel, Co.Longford 2011 Killarney, Co.Kerry 1981 Mountshannon, Co.Clare 2012 Abbeyshrule, Co.Longford 1982 Dunmanway, Co.Cork 2013 Moynalty, Co.Meath 1983 Terryglass, Co.Tipperary 2014 Kilkenny City, Co.Kilkenny 1984 Trim, Co.Meath 2015 Letterkenny, Co.Donegal 1985 Kilkenny City, Co.Kilkenny 2016 Skerries, Co.Dublin 1986 Kinsale, Co.Cork 2017 Birdhill, Co.Tipperary 1987 Sneem, Co.Kerry 2018 Listowel, Co.Kerry 1988 Carlingford, Co.Louth 2019 Glaslough, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisicum 3. Pp.11-20
    CRISICUM 3. PERIODICA DIRECIEI PARCULUI NAIONAL CRI-MURE 2000 Szarvas CRISICUM 3. PERIODICA DIRECIEI PARCULUI NAIONAL CRI-MURE 2000 Szarvas Publicat în 2000 Editat de DIRECIA PARCULUI NAIONAL CRI-MURE Editat de: KALIVODA BÉLA Volumul a fost elaborat cu sprijinul programului Phare CBC Ungaria-România al Uniunii Europene ISSN 1419-2853 Editor responsabil: © Tirják László Tiprit n Tipografia Kner-Gyoma TARTALOM Bagi István: A folyómedri iszapnövényzet vegetációdinamikája 11 Bölöni János - Király Gergely: Erdei növényfajok elterjedésmintázata a Fekete-Körös 21 mentén Mihalik Erzsébet - Medvegy Anna - Gocs Katalin - Szllsi István - Kálmán 27 Katalin - Tóth Katalin: Moduláris jellemzk és generatív sajátosságok alkalmazhatósága ével növénypopulációk korösszetételének és életképességének becslésében Jakab Gusztáv - Röfler János - Szabó László - Tóth Tamás: Florisztikai adatok a 37 Körös-Maros Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság illetékességi területérl Ruprecht Eszter: Elzetes megfigyelések az Erdélyi-Mezség felhagyott szántói táji 43 lépték vegetációdinamikájának fbb trendjeirl Kertész Éva: Sziki tölgyes és sziki magaskórós maradványok a Dél-Tiszántúlon 57 Jakab Gusztáv: Adatok a Pádis karsztvidékének (Bihar-hegység) mohaflórájához 65 Penksza Károly: A Dél-Tiszántúl új taxonjai, különös tekintettel a Poaceae család 73 tagjaira Domokos Tamás - Lennert József: A Körösök és a Berettyó puhatesti 79 Gulyás Pál: Rotatoria és Crustacea vizsgálatok a Körös-Maros Nemzeti Park 111 víztereiben Juhász Péter - Kiss Béla - Olajos Péter - Grigorszky István: Vízi makroszkópikus
    [Show full text]
  • ZPRÁVA O Činnosti Senátu a Jeho Orgánů V Roce 2018
    ZPRÁVA o činnosti Senátu a jeho orgánů v roce 2018 Úvod .................................................................................................................... 3 Doplňovací a pravidelné volby do Senátu v roce 2018 ................................................ 3 Společná schůze Senátu a Poslanecké sněmovny ....................................................... 4 Legislativní proces ................................................................................................. 5 Senátní iniciativy v roce 2018 ................................................................................. 9 Mezinárodní smlouvy ............................................................................................11 Evropská agenda ..................................................................................................11 Petice ..................................................................................................................12 Výroční zprávy, dokumenty či informace projednávané Senátem ................................14 Informace a rozhodnutí podle čl. 43 Ústavy ČR ........................................................15 Nominace ............................................................................................................16 Usnesení Senátu k aktuálním otázkám ....................................................................16 Státní vyznamenání ..............................................................................................18 Orgány Senátu .....................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]