APPENDIX C-3 Periphyton Taxonomical and Density Data, 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

APPENDIX C-3 Periphyton Taxonomical and Density Data, 2010 KITSAULT MINE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX C-3 Periphyton Taxonomical and Density Data, 2010 VE51988 – Appendices Table C-3-1: Periphyton Taxonomic Composition And Density (#cells/ml) Data In Lakes, Kitsault Mine Project, 2010 FES Sample # 100534 100535 100536 100537 100538 100539 100540 100541 100542 100543 100544 100545 100546 100547 100548 Date 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- Units: # cells/ml 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 10 10 10 10 10 Area Sampled (cm2) 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 Location LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 PC PC PC PC PC L901-O L901-O L901-O L901-O L901-O Taxonomy Order Sample 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Phylum Genera and Species Chrysophyta Centrales Melosira sp. <45.5 Bacillariophycae Pennales Achnanthes flexella (diatoms) Achnanthes lanceolata <18.4 <15.9 <20.2 Achnanthes minutissima 4,147.0 4,442.4 1,237.6 5,014.4 <25.8 8,590.0 6,516.8 1,221.6 1,684.0 23,059.8 48.7 Achnanthes spp. 858.0 370.2 309.4 470.1 111.6 407.3 39.4 <21.7 332.9 97.4 Amphipleura pellucida Anomoeoneis spp. <45.5 Caloneis spp. Ceratoneis arcus 92.0 15.9 40.0 80.8 <25.8 57.6 210.2 <19.7 21.7 171.6 Cocconeis placentula <18.4 15.9 <20.0 <20.2 <14.4 105.2 <19.7 86.8 <42.9 Cymbella cf. cestaii <58.1 910.0 <48.7 Cymbella cf. microcephala Cymbella cistula <18.4 <14.4 <52.6 <19.7 <21.7 <42.9 Cymbella lunata <28.6 4,186.0 <48.7 Cymbella minuta 15.9 20.0 <20.2 14.4 <19.7 Cymbella sinuata 184.0 1,234.0 280.0 202.0 558.0 1,683.2 610.8 673.6 943.8 Cymbella spp. Diatoma elongatum 28.8 420.8 19.7 130.2 514.8 Diatoma hiemale Diatoma mesodon 36.8 <20.2 <14.4 <52.6 Didymosphenia geminata Eunotia spp. 18.4 63.6 <20.0 <20.2 <25.8 <14.4 <21.7 348.6 2,101.4 112.6 11,985.0 2,922.0 Fragilaria vaucheriae 73.6 <20.0 20.2 28.8 736.4 <19.7 86.8 858.0 Fragilaria spp. 105.2 21.7 <28.6 Frustulia sp. <58.1 <28.6 <29.1 1,274.0 487.0 Gomphonema gracile <45.5 <48.7 Gomphonema truncatum Gomphonema spp. 147.2 1,851.0 320.0 121.2 <25.8 28.8 210.2 <19.7 217.0 <42.9 <58.1 <28.6 182.0 292.2 Meridion circulare <14.4 52.6 <19.7 <42.9 Navicula spp. <15.9 <28.6 91.0 97.4 Neidium sp. Nitzschia spp. ? Peronia sp. Pinnularia spp. Stauroneis sp. Stenopterobia sp. Synedra incisa <171.6 Synedra ulna <18.4 <14.4 <42.9 Synedra spp. 18.4 31.8 20.0 20.2 <25.8 115.2 3,366.4 78.8 130.2 3,260.4 1,162.0 57.2 <29.1 364.0 194.8 Tabellaria fenestrata <48.7 FES Sample # 100534 100535 100536 100537 100538 100539 100540 100541 100542 100543 100544 100545 100546 100547 100548 Date 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- Units: # cells/ml 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 10 10 10 10 10 Area Sampled (cm2) 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 Location LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 PC PC PC PC PC L901-O L901-O L901-O L901-O L901-O Taxonomy Order Sample 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Phylum Genera and Species Tabellaria flocculosa <52.6 <58.1 <28.6 <29.1 227.5 194.8 Tetracyclus sp. <20.2 UID girdle view <20.2 <14.4 <19.7 <45.5 <48.7 Deformed Diatoms* Chlorophyta Chaetophorales Chaetosphaeridium sp. (green algae) Michrothamnion sp. Stigeoclonium sp. 13,395.0 UID Chaetophorales <42.9 Chlorococcales Ankistrodesmus spp. <58.1 <28.6 <29.1 364.0 <48.7 Crucegenia sp.? <58.1 <45.5 Oocystis spp. <58.1 57.2 225.2 45.5 Pediastrum spp. Scenedesmus spp. Oedogoniales Bulbochaete sp. <48.7 Oedogonium spp. 3,276.0 1,363.6 Ulothricales Geminella sp. <45.5 Microspora sp. <45.5 Ulothrix spp.? Volvocales Chlamydomonas sp. 221.2 <45.5 <48.7 Zygnematales Arthrodesmus sp. Closterium spp. Cosmarium spp. <45.5 <48.7 Euastrum spp. Mougeotia spp. <45.5 Penium sp. Spirogyra sp. Staurastrum sp. Xanthidium sp. UID Chlorophyta colonial <42.9 <28.6 728.0 UID Chlorophyta filamentous <18.4 UID Chlorophyta flagellate 58.1 UID Chlorophyta unicellular <58.1 276.5 56.3 1,410.0 Chrysophyta Chromulinales Chrysococcus sp. <58.1 110.6 56.3 91.0 <48.7 (golden-brown Hydrurus sp. 271.6 algae) Ochromonadales Hyalobryon sp. Kephyrion / Pseudokephyrion sp. <29.1 Phaeplacales Phaeplaca sp. UID Chrysophyta colonial UID Chrysophyta cyst <58.1 165.9 <29.1 <45.5 UID Chrysophyta unicellular 143.0 <20.2 111.6 20,036.5 55.3 Chryptophyta UID Cryptomonadales 57.2 112.6 182.0 FES Sample # 100534 100535 100536 100537 100538 100539 100540 100541 100542 100543 100544 100545 100546 100547 100548 Date 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- 31-Aug- Units: # cells/ml 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 5-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 4-Sep-10 10 10 10 10 10 Area Sampled (cm2) 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 Location LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 LC3-10 PC PC PC PC PC L901-O L901-O L901-O L901-O L901-O Taxonomy Order Sample 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Phylum Genera and Species (cryptomonads) Cyanophyta Chamaesiphonales Chamaesiphon spp. 65,461.9 46,530.4 166,698.0 2,266,299.6 31,783.0 64,236.4 78,177.4 19,443.0 791,719.8 110,534.4 (blue-green algae) Clastidium spp. 152.7 35,870.8 2,703.4 Aphanocapsa sp. <45.5 1,558.4 Chroococcales Aphanothece sp. <28.6 UID Chroococcales 1,801.6 110.6 168.9 <48.7 Nostocales Anabaena/Nostoc sp. Calothrix / Dichothrix spp. <45.5 4,090.8 Dichothrix sp. <48.7 Stigonema sp. <45.5 779.2 Tolypothrix sp. Tolypothrix sp? <15.9 464.8 <48.7 UID Nostocales <14.4 <45.5 <48.7 Oscillatoriales Homoeothrix varians 18,161.0 6,170.0 12,685.4 836,755.8 1,135.2 2,343.6 24,030.7 5,955.3 <21.7 372,800.1 3,815.7 Lyngbya spp. <15.9 <21.7 <42.9 53,580.0 Oscillatoria spp. 499.1 1,372.8 78,960.0 <48.7 Pseudoanabaena spp. 143.1 <29.1 <45.5 Schizothrix sp. UID Oscillatoriales <18.4 <20.0 <14.4 <58.1 87.3 <45.5 487.0 Pyrrophyta Dinokontae UID Dinoflagellate (dinoflagellates) Rhodophyta Nemalionales Audouinella sp. 55.2 <20.0 161.6 <14.4 <52.6 <42.9 <58.1 57.2 (red algae) Batrachospermum sp. <58.1 6,746.6 <29.1 119,805.0 876.6 basal cells 52,913.0 UID colonial 4,480.3 130.2 <28.6 <29.1 <45.5 584.4 UID filamentous <14.4 <21.7 UID flagellate 110.6 182.0 UID unicellular 286.0 123.4 154.7 40.4 103.2 558 814.6 305.4 336.8 332.9 <58.1 276.5 225.2 4,230.0 3,023.6 Note: * All the same species of Eunotia; ? = possibly for genus; cf. = (confertim = close together ) = possibly for species; UID = unidentified due to lack of size and / or missing morphological characters.; Synonyms: Cymbella lunata = Cymbella gracilis; Diatoma mesodon = Diatoma hiemale var. mesodon; and LC1-10-referred to as Lower Lime Creek (LLC), LC3-10 as Upper Lime Creek (ULC), L-901-I and L901-O as Sad Lake Inlet (SLI) and Sad Lake Outlet (SLO) on preserved samples Table C-2-1: Periphyton taxonomic composition and density (#cells/ml) data in Lakes, Kitsault Mine Project, 2010 (continued) FES Sample # 100549 100550 100551 100552 100553 100554 100555 100556 100557 100558 100559 100560 100561 100562 100563 Date 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- 11-Sep- Units: # cells/ml 1-Sep-10 1Sep-10 1-Sep-10 1-Sep-10 1-Sep-10 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 Area Sampled (cm2) 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 19.635 Location LC1-10 LC1-10 LC1-10 LC1-10 LC1-10 L901-I L901-I L901-I L901-I L901-I CL-O CL-O CL-O CL-O CL-O Taxonomy Order Sample 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Phylum Genera and Species Chrysophyta Centrales Melosira sp.
Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phytoplankton of an Enriched, Soft-Water Lake Subject to Intermittent Hydraulic Flushing
    The phytoplankton of an enriched, soft- water lakel subject to intermittent hydraulic flushing (Grasmere, English Lake District) Item Type monograph Authors Reynolds, C.S.; Lund, J.W.G. Publisher Freshwater Biological Association Download date 01/10/2021 05:29:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/22651 The Phytoplankton of an enriched, soft-water lake subject to intermittent hydraulic flushing. (Grasmere, English Lake District) by C.S. Reynolds and J.W.G. Lund Project Leader : C.S. Reynolds Report Date : November 1987 Report to : North West Water FBA Report Ref No. Wl/207/5 FBA Project No. 207 The phytoplankton of an enriched, soft-water lake subject to intermittent hydraulic flushing (Grasmere, English Lake District). C.S. REYNOLDS and J.W.G. LUND, Freshwater Biological Association, Windermere Laboratory, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 OLP, U.K. Running Head : Phytoplankton of Grasmere Correspondence : C.S. Reynolds, Freshwater Biological Association, Windermere Laboratory, Ambleside, Cumbria, LA22 OLP 2 SUMMARY 1. The abundance and species composition of the phytoplankton of Grasmere were monitored over a 12-year period following the commissioning of a small sewage treatment works, upstream of the lake. 2. Although Grasmere has been subject to increased phosphorus-loading and has quickly developed many features associated with eutrophication, the composition of its plankton has retained the characteristics of a mesotrophic, soft-water lake: a vernal diatom maximum, generally dominated by Asterionella, is followed by summer growths of nanoplanktonic species, of various colonial Chlorophyceae, before a substantial return to Asterionella-dominance in the autumn. In cooler summers, there have been episodes of renewed diatom growth, followed by truncated recapitulations of the essential summer sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D.
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo De Las Algas Y Cianoprocariotas Dulciacuícolas De Cuba
    CATÁLOGO DE LAS ALGAS Y CIANOPROCARIOTAS DULCIACUÍCOLAS DE CUBA. EDITORIAL Augusto Comas González UNIVERSO o S U R CATÁLOGO DE LAS ALGAS Y CIANOPROCARIOTAS DULCIACUÍCOLAS DE CUBA. 1 2 CATÁLOGO DE LAS ALGAS Y CIANOPROCARIOTAS DULCIACUÍCOLAS DE CUBA. Augusto Comas González 3 Dirección Editorial: MSc. Alberto Valdés Guada Diseño: D.I. Roberto C. Berroa Cabrera Autor: Augusto Comas González Compilación y edición científica: Augusto Comas González © Reservados todos los derechos por lo que no se permite la reproduc- ción total o parcial de este libro. Editorial UNIVERSO SUR Universidad de Cienfuegos Carretera a Rodas, Km. 4. Cuatro Caminos Cienfuegos, CUBA © ISBN: 978-959-257-228-7 4 Indice INTRODUCCIÓN 7 CYANOPROKARYOTA 9 Clase Cyanophyceae 9 Orden Chroococcales Wettstein 1923 9 Orden Oscillatoriales Elenkin 1934 15 Orden Nostocales (Borzi) Geitler 1925 19 Orden Stigonematales Geitler 1925 22 Clase Chrysophyceae 23 Orden Chromulinales 23 Orden Ochromonadales 23 Orden Prymnesiales 24 Clase Xanthophyceae (= Tribophyceae) 24 Orden Mischococcales Pascher 1913 24 Orden Tribonematales Pascher 1939 25 Orden Botrydiales 26 Orden Vaucheriales 26 Clase Dinophyceae 26 Orden Peridiniales 26 Clase Cryptophyceae 27 Orden Cryptomonadales 27 Clase Rhodophyceae Ruprecht 1851 28 Orden Porphyridiales Kylin 1937 28 Orden Compsopogonales Skuja 1939 28 Orden Nemalionales Schmitz 1892 28 Orden Hildenbrandiales Pueschel & Cole 1982) 29 Orden Ceramiales 29 Clase Glaucocystophyceae Kies et Kremer 1989 29 Clase Euglenophyceae 29 Orden Euglenales 29 Clase Bacillariophyceae 34 Orden Centrales 34 Orden Pennales 35 Clase Prasinophyceae Chadefaud 1950 50 Orden Polyblepharidales Korš. 1938 50 Orden Tetraselmidales Ettl 1983 51 Clase Chlamydophyceae Ettl 1981 51 Orden Chlamydomonadales Frtisch in G.S. West 1927 51 5 Orden Volvocales Oltmanns 1904 52 Orden Chlorococcales Marchand 1895 Orth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of Lower Organisms
    The Classification of Lower Organisms Ernst Hkinrich Haickei, in 1874 From Rolschc (1906). By permission of Macrae Smith Company. C f3 The Classification of LOWER ORGANISMS By HERBERT FAULKNER COPELAND \ PACIFIC ^.,^,kfi^..^ BOOKS PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA Copyright 1956 by Herbert F. Copeland Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 56-7944 Published by PACIFIC BOOKS Palo Alto, California Printed and bound in the United States of America CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Introduction 1 II. An Essay on Nomenclature 6 III. Kingdom Mychota 12 Phylum Archezoa 17 Class 1. Schizophyta 18 Order 1. Schizosporea 18 Order 2. Actinomycetalea 24 Order 3. Caulobacterialea 25 Class 2. Myxoschizomycetes 27 Order 1. Myxobactralea 27 Order 2. Spirochaetalea 28 Class 3. Archiplastidea 29 Order 1. Rhodobacteria 31 Order 2. Sphaerotilalea 33 Order 3. Coccogonea 33 Order 4. Gloiophycea 33 IV. Kingdom Protoctista 37 V. Phylum Rhodophyta 40 Class 1. Bangialea 41 Order Bangiacea 41 Class 2. Heterocarpea 44 Order 1. Cryptospermea 47 Order 2. Sphaerococcoidea 47 Order 3. Gelidialea 49 Order 4. Furccllariea 50 Order 5. Coeloblastea 51 Order 6. Floridea 51 VI. Phylum Phaeophyta 53 Class 1. Heterokonta 55 Order 1. Ochromonadalea 57 Order 2. Silicoflagellata 61 Order 3. Vaucheriacea 63 Order 4. Choanoflagellata 67 Order 5. Hyphochytrialea 69 Class 2. Bacillariacea 69 Order 1. Disciformia 73 Order 2. Diatomea 74 Class 3. Oomycetes 76 Order 1. Saprolegnina 77 Order 2. Peronosporina 80 Order 3. Lagenidialea 81 Class 4. Melanophycea 82 Order 1 . Phaeozoosporea 86 Order 2. Sphacelarialea 86 Order 3. Dictyotea 86 Order 4. Sporochnoidea 87 V ly Chapter Page Orders. Cutlerialea 88 Order 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Phylogenetic Position of the Enigmatic Golden Alga Phaeothamnion Confervicola: Ultrastructure, Pigment Composition and Partial Ssu Rdna Sequence1
    J. Phycol. 34, 286±298 (1998) CHARACTERIZATION AND PHYLOGENETIC POSITION OF THE ENIGMATIC GOLDEN ALGA PHAEOTHAMNION CONFERVICOLA: ULTRASTRUCTURE, PIGMENT COMPOSITION AND PARTIAL SSU RDNA SEQUENCE1 Robert A. Andersen,2 Dan Potter 3 Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, West Boothbay Harbor, Maine 04575 Robert R. Bidigare, Mikel Latasa 4 Department of Oceanography, 1000 Pope Road, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Kingsley Rowan School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia and Charles J. O'Kelly Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, West Boothbay Harbor, Maine 04575 ABSTRACT coxanthin, diadinoxanthin, diatoxanthin, heteroxanthin, The morphology, ultrastructure, photosynthetic pig- and b,b-carotene as well as chlorophylls a and c. The ments, and nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal DNA complete sequence of the SSU rDNA could not be obtained, (SSU rDNA) were examined for Phaeothamnion con- but a partial sequence (1201 bases) was determined. Par- fervicola Lagerheim strain SAG119.79. The morphology simony and neighbor-joining distance analyses of SSU rDNA from Phaeothamnion and 36 other chromophyte of the vegetative ®laments, as viewed under light micros- È copy, was indistinguishable from the isotype. Light micros- algae (with two Oomycete fungi as the outgroup) indicated copy, including epi¯uorescence microscopy, also revealed that Phaeothamnion was a weakly supported (bootstrap the presence of one to three chloroplasts in both vegetative 5,50%, 52%) sister taxon to the Xanthophyceae rep- cells and zoospores. Vegetative ®laments occasionally trans- resentatives and that this combined clade was in turn a formed to a palmelloid stage in old cultures. An eyespot weakly supported (bootstrap 5,50%, 67%) sister to the was not visible in zoospores when examined with light mi- Phaeophyceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis Doctoral Julen Urra Ibañez De Sendadiano
    Tesis Doctoral BENEFICIOS Y RIESGOS DE LA APLICACIÓN DE ENMIENDAS ORGÁNICAS SOBRE LA SALUD DE SUELOS AGRÍCOLAS Julen Urra Ibañez de Sendadiano Directores: Dr. Carlos Garbisu Crespo Dr. Iker Mijangos Amezaga 2020 (c)2020 JULEN URRA IBAÑEZ DE SENDADIANO | AGRADECIMIENTOS ESKERRAK En primer lugar, me gustaría agradecer al Departamento de Conservación de los Recursos Naturales de NEIKER y, en particular, a mis directores de tesis, el Dr. Carlos Garbisu Crespo y el Dr. Iker Mijangos Amezaga, por haberme concedido la oportunidad de realizar este trabajo, y por su apoyo durante el transcurso del mismo. Gracias también a la comisión académica del Programa de Doctorado de Agrobiología Ambiental que coordina la Dra. Carmen Gonzalez Murua, y particularmente a mi tutor, el Dr. Jose María Becerril Soto, por su apoyo a lo largo de estos años. Asimismo, quiero agradecer al Departamento de Desarrollo Económico y Competitividad del Gobierno Vasco el haberme otorgado una beca predoctoral para la realización de este trabajo. De la misma forma, este trabajo es obra de la colaboración activa con distintas empresas e instituciones, cuyo apoyo ha sido indispensable para la consecución de varios de los objetivos de este trabajo. Por ello, me gustaría dar las gracias a: La Universidad de Lleida y, en especial, al Dr. Jaume Lloveras. La Mancomunidad de la Comarca de Pamplona y en particular, a Sandra Bázquez, de la estación depuradora de aguas residuales de Arazuri. Los Agricultores de la Montaña Alavesa, sobre todo, a Ricardo Corres. La empresa Vitaveris: Jesús y Adelardo. Los Servicios Generales de Investigación (SGIker) de la UPV/EHU, en especial, a la Dra.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Algae in Britain and Ireland - Bibliography
    Freshwater algae in Britain and Ireland - Bibliography Floras, monographs, articles with records and environmental information, together with papers dealing with taxonomic/nomenclatural changes since 2003 (previous update of ‘Coded List’) as well as those helpful for identification purposes. Theses are listed only where available online and include unpublished information. Useful websites are listed at the end of the bibliography. Further links to relevant information (catalogues, websites, photocatalogues) can be found on the site managed by the British Phycological Society (http://www.brphycsoc.org/links.lasso). Abbas A, Godward MBE (1964) Cytology in relation to taxonomy in Chaetophorales. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 58: 499–597. Abbott J, Emsley F, Hick T, Stubbins J, Turner WB, West W (1886) Contributions to a fauna and flora of West Yorkshire: algae (exclusive of Diatomaceae). Transactions of the Leeds Naturalists' Club and Scientific Association 1: 69–78, pl.1. Acton E (1909) Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, a new member of the Palmellaceae. Annals of Botany 23: 537–573. Acton E (1916a) On the structure and origin of Cladophora-balls. New Phytologist 15: 1–10. Acton E (1916b) On a new penetrating alga. New Phytologist 15: 97–102. Acton E (1916c) Studies on the nuclear division in desmids. 1. Hyalotheca dissiliens (Smith) Bréb. Annals of Botany 30: 379–382. Adams J (1908) A synopsis of Irish algae, freshwater and marine. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 27B: 11–60. Ahmadjian V (1967) A guide to the algae occurring as lichen symbionts: isolation, culture, cultural physiology and identification. Phycologia 6: 127–166 Allanson BR (1973) The fine structure of the periphyton of Chara sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing Life in the Sea
    May 24, 2019 Observing Life in the Sea Sanctuaries MBON Monterey Bay, Florida Keys, and Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuaries Principal Investigators: Frank Muller-Karger (USF) Francisco Chávez (MBARI) Illustration by Kelly Lance© 2016 MBARI Partners: E. Montes/M. Breitbart/A. Djurhuus/N. Sawaya1, K. Pitz/R. Michisaki2, Maria Kavanaugh3, S. Gittings/A. Bruckner/K. Thompson4, B.Kirkpatrick5, M. Buchman6, A. DeVogelaere/J. Brown7, J. Field8, S. Bograd8, E. Hazen8, A. Boehm9, K. O'Keife/L. McEachron10, G. Graettinger11, J. Lamkin12, E. (Libby) Johns/C. Kelble/C. Sinigalliano/J. Hendee13, M. Roffer14 , B. Best15 Sanctuaries MBON 1 College of Marine Science, Univ. of South Florida (USF), St Petersburg, FL; 2 MBARI/CenCOOS, CA; 3 Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; 4 NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), Washington, DC; 5 Texas A&M University (TAMU/GCOOS), College Station, TX; Monterey Bay, 6 NOAA Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS), Key West, FL; Florida Keys, and 7 NOAA Monterey Bay National Marine Sanct. (MBNMS), Monterey, CA; Flower Garden Banks 8 NOAA SW Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC), La Jolla, CA, 9 Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA; National Marine Sanctuaries 10 Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI), St Petersburg, FL; 11NOAA Office of Response and Restoration (ORR), Seattle, WA; Principal Investigators: 12NOAA SE Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC), Miami, FL; Frank Muller-Karger (USF) 13NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorol. Lab. (AOML), Miami,
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom Chromista)
    J Mol Evol (2006) 62:388–420 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0353-8 Phylogeny and Megasystematics of Phagotrophic Heterokonts (Kingdom Chromista) Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Ema E-Y. Chao Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK Received: 11 December 2004 / Accepted: 21 September 2005 [Reviewing Editor: Patrick J. Keeling] Abstract. Heterokonts are evolutionarily important gyristea cl. nov. of Ochrophyta as once thought. The as the most nutritionally diverse eukaryote supergroup zooflagellate class Bicoecea (perhaps the ancestral and the most species-rich branch of the eukaryotic phenotype of Bigyra) is unexpectedly diverse and a kingdom Chromista. Ancestrally photosynthetic/ major focus of our study. We describe four new bicil- phagotrophic algae (mixotrophs), they include several iate bicoecean genera and five new species: Nerada ecologically important purely heterotrophic lineages, mexicana, Labromonas fenchelii (=Pseudobodo all grossly understudied phylogenetically and of tremulans sensu Fenchel), Boroka karpovii (=P. uncertain relationships. We sequenced 18S rRNA tremulans sensu Karpov), Anoeca atlantica and Cafe- genes from 14 phagotrophic non-photosynthetic het- teria mylnikovii; several cultures were previously mis- erokonts and a probable Ochromonas, performed ph- identified as Pseudobodo tremulans. Nerada and the ylogenetic analysis of 210–430 Heterokonta, and uniciliate Paramonas are related to Siluania and revised higher classification of Heterokonta and its Adriamonas; this clade (Pseudodendromonadales three phyla: the predominantly photosynthetic Och- emend.) is probably sister to Bicosoeca. Genetically rophyta; the non-photosynthetic Pseudofungi; and diverse Caecitellus is probably related to Anoeca, Bigyra (now comprising subphyla Opalozoa, Bicoecia, Symbiomonas and Cafeteria (collectively Anoecales Sagenista). The deepest heterokont divergence is emend.). Boroka is sister to Pseudodendromonadales/ apparently between Bigyra, as revised here, and Och- Bicoecales/Anoecales.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Ω-3 and Ω-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Produced by Different Phytoplankton Taxa at Early and Late Growth Phase
    biomolecules Article Variation in !-3 and !-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Produced by Different Phytoplankton Taxa at Early and Late Growth Phase Sami Taipale 1,* , Elina Peltomaa 2,3 and Pauliina Salmi 4 1 Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Nanoscience center, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (YA), 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland 2 Institute of Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland; elina.peltomaa@helsinki.fi 3 Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4 (Yliopistonkatu 3), 00014 Helsinki, Finland 4 Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylän, Finland; pauliina.u.m.salmi@jyu.fi * Correspondence: sami.taipale@jyu.fi Received: 28 February 2020; Accepted: 31 March 2020; Published: 6 April 2020 Abstract: Phytoplankton synthesizes essential !-3 and !-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for consumers in the aquatic food webs. Only certain phytoplankton taxa can synthesize eicosapentaenoic (EPA; 20:5!3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6!3), whereas all phytoplankton taxa can synthesize shorter-chain !-3 and !-6 PUFA. Here, we experimentally studied how the proportion, 1 1 concentration (per DW and cell-specific), and production (µg FA L− day− ) of !-3 and !-6 PUFA varied among six different phytoplankton main groups (16 freshwater strains) and between exponential and stationary growth phase. EPA and DHA concentrations, as dry weight, were similar among cryptophytes and diatoms. However, Cryptomonas erosa had two–27 times higher EPA and DHA content per cell than the other tested cryptophytes, diatoms, or golden algae.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinoflagellates from Hainan Island: Potential Threat for Transporting Harmful Algae from Hainan to Japan
    Dinoflagellates from Hainan Island: Potential threat for transporting harmful algae from Hainan to Japan Anqi Yin Department of Ecosystem Studies School of Environmental Science The University of Shiga Prefecture March 2015 ABSTRACT Coastal areas in Hainan Island, China, are important for commercial fisheries, but few studies on harmful algal bloom (HAB) have been performed to date. In south part of Japan, large quantities of the seedlings for greater amberjack farming are imported from Hainan Island every year since 1988. In this study, the dinoflagellate species were identified and described from the plankton samples around Hainan Island to make a list of the species occurred including HAB species for providing against potential threat of HAB events. Additionally, phytoplankton communities between Hainan Island and the two bays in south part of Japan were determined from the plankton and the sediment samples using both microscopic and molecular analyses, to evaluate a possibility for artificial transportation of tropical HAB species to Japan. A total of 37 dinoflagellate species in 11 genera from nine families were identified from 11 coastal stations around Hainan Island. Eight toxic and four red tide-forming species were found at most stations, except for Station (St.) 4. These species included the five genera of Ceratium, Dinophysis, Lingulodinium, Prorocentrum, and Protoperidium. Ceratium furca, a red tide-forming species, and Prorocentrum rhathymum, a ciguatera fish poisoning species, were occurred in large numbers at St. 7 and 8, respectively, both of which are near fish farms or fishing villages. Prorocentrum lima and Dinophysis acuminata are diarrhetic shellfish poisoning species and Lingulodinium polyedrum is a yessotoxin species, which appeared only at St.
    [Show full text]