A Library in the Making
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why the Proposed Maryland Constitution Was Not Approved
William & Mary Law Review Volume 10 (1968-1969) Issue 2 Article 6 December 1968 Why the Proposed Maryland Constitution Was Not Approved Thomas G. Pullen Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Repository Citation Thomas G. Pullen Jr., Why the Proposed Maryland Constitution Was Not Approved, 10 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 378 (1968), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol10/iss2/6 Copyright c 1968 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr WHY THE PROPOSED MARYLAND CONSTITUTION WAS NOT APPROVED THOMAS G. PULLEN, JR.* The people of Maryland simply did not want a new constitution so they went to the polls on May 14, 1968, and turned down the proposed constitution by a majority of more than 80,000. The apathy of the voters toward a new constitution was really expressed in the election held on September 13, 1966, when they approved the calling of a con- stitutional convention by a vote of 166,617 "for" and 31,692 "against," while in a concurrent primary election the vote was 609,747 of a total voter registration of 1,396,060. Obviously, interest in a new constitution was relatively slight. One of the most serious mistakes made by the proponents of a new constitution was to hold the vote on calling a constitutional convention at the same time as a primary election. The proponents probably thought the people would vote in greater numbers for the constitutional conven- tion if they were at the polls in a popular election; however, the converse was true. -
Federal Depository Library Directory
Federal Depositoiy Library Directory MARCH 2001 Library Programs Service Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Wasliington, DC 20401 U.S. Government Printing Office Michael F. DIMarlo, Public Printer Superintendent of Documents Francis ]. Buclcley, Jr. Library Programs Service ^ Gil Baldwin, Director Depository Services Robin Haun-Mohamed, Chief Federal depository Library Directory Library Programs Service Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Wasliington, DC 20401 2001 \ CONTENTS Preface iv Federal Depository Libraries by State and City 1 Maps: Federal Depository Library System 74 Regional Federal Depository Libraries 74 Regional Depositories by State and City 75 U.S. Government Printing Office Booi<stores 80 iii Keeping America Informed Federal Depository Library Program A Program of the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) *******^******* • Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) makes information produced by Federal Government agencies available for public access at no fee. • Access is through nearly 1,320 depository libraries located throughout the U.S. and its possessions, or, for online electronic Federal information, through GPO Access on the Litemet. * ************** Government Information at a Library Near You: The Federal Depository Library Program ^ ^ The Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) was established by Congress to ensure that the American public has access to its Government's information (44 U.S.C. §§1901-1916). For more than 140 years, depository libraries have supported the public's right to know by collecting, organizing, preserving, and assisting users with information from the Federal Government. The Government Printing Office provides Government information products at no cost to designated depository libraries throughout the country. These depository libraries, in turn, provide local, no-fee access in an impartial environment with professional assistance. -
A Survey of Public Library Certification Requirements in the National Library Community
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 354 923 IR 054 509 AUTHOR McCracken, John R. TITLE A Survey of Public Library Certification Requirements in the National Library Community. SPONS AGENCY Nevada State Library and Archives, Carson City. PUB DATE Jan 92 NOTE 55p. AVAILABLE FROM John R. McGacken, 2813 Sandy Lane, Fort Worth, TX 76112 ($15.50). PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Certification; *Employment Qualifications; *Librarians; National Surveys; *Public Libraries; State Agencies; State Legislation; *StateStandards; Users (Information) ABSTRACT This survey examined the certification lawsor plans for certification of public library personnelin the United States. Descriptions of state certification lawsor plans were derived from state library manuals, from previoussurveys, and from a telephone survey of representatives of state library agencies. Sixteenstates have mandatory certification of two levelsor more. Mandatory certification, without a defined plan, exists inseven states, although the procedure is inactive insome. Voluntary certification is found in 8 states, and 19 haveno certification. This report lists states alphabetically and summarizes their certification requirements. A list of definitions andacronyms is included; and the appendix lists the library agencies of the 50states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Department of Education. (SLD) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRSare the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) O Th6S document has been :eproduCed as received from the person or organization original:no it 0 Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality Points of new or opinions stated in thisdocu. -
NCESALS – NECES Academic Survey Lrs Updated Roster: September 2012 (RNR) ALA Office for Research & Statistics Alabama Dian
NCESALS – NECES Academic Survey LRs Updated Roster: September 2012 (RNR) Alabama Alaska Diane Sherman Karen Jensen Alabama Commission on Higher Education Collection Development Officer Director of Research Services Elmer E. Rasmuson Library 100 North Union Street, Suite 778 University of Alaska Fairbanks Montgomery, AL 36130-2000 P.O. Box 756800 Phone: 334-242-2742 Fairbanks, AK 99775-6800 Fax: 334-242-0268 Phone: 907-474-6695 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 907-474-6841 E-mail: [email protected] Arizona Ginger Pauley Arkansas Institutional Reporting Manager Judy Ganson Apollo Group, Inc. Director for Collections Management and Support University of Phoenix, Student Financial Aid University of Arkansas Libraries, 4025 S. Riverpoint Parkway, MS-AA L101 365 N. McIlroy Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85040-0723 Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701-4002 Phone: 602-412-9105 Phone: 479-575-2130 Fax: 602-735-8646 Fax: 479-575-6656 E-mail: E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] California Colorado Estina Pratt Nicolle Steffen Learning Services Coordinator Director Library Research Service Compton Community College Colorado Department of Education 1111 E. Artesia Blvd 201 E. Colfax Ave., Suite 309 Compton, CA 90221 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 310-900-1600 Phone: 303-866-6927 Fax: 310-900-1679 Fax: 303-866-6940 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Connecticut Delaware Tracy Ralston Robert Wetherall, Coordinator Traurig Library and Learning Resources Center Delaware Division of Libraries Post University 121 Duke of York Street 800 Country Club Rd Dover, DE 19950 Waterbury, CT 06708-3200 Phone: 302-739-4748 x5136 Phone: 203-596-4564 Fax: 302-739-6787 Fax: 203-575-9691 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] District of Columbia Florida Mark D. -
When Constitutions Collide: a Study in Federalism in the Criminal Law Context Michael R
University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 18 Article 3 Issue 1 Fall 1988 1988 When Constitutions Collide: A Study in Federalism in the Criminal Law Context Michael R. Braudes University of Baltimore School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Braudes, Michael R. (1988) "When Constitutions Collide: A Study in Federalism in the Criminal Law Context," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 18: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol18/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHEN CONSTITUTIONS COLLIDE: A STUDY IN FEDERALISM IN THE CRIMINAL LAW CONTEXT Michael R. Braudest I. INTRODUCTION Most of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States that apply to criminal cases have cognate provisions in the constitutions of the various states - provisions that create the same right or restriction. Often the language of the state provisions is quite similar to that of the parallel federal provision. When the Supreme Court of the United States interprets a provision of the federal charter in a manner that conflicts with state precedent, and a subsequent similar case in a state court brings into question the proper construction of the cognate provision of the state's constitution, the state court will be confronted with a choice be tween following the holding of the Supreme Court or construing the state constitution independently. -
The Tax Articles of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, 13 Md
Maryland Law Review Volume 13 | Issue 2 Article 1 The aT x Articles of the Maryland Declaration of Rights H. H. Walker Lewis Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Taxation-State and Local Commons Recommended Citation H. H. Lewis, The Tax Articles of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, 13 Md. L. Rev. 83 (1953) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol13/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maryland Law Review VOLUME XIII SPRING, 1953 NUMBER 2 THE TAX ARTICLES OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS By H. H. WALKER LEwIs* Although the Maryland Declaration of Rights has had a declining significance in the decision of tax cases, it is still basic to our governmental structure and has much current as well as historical interest. The Declaration of Rights is a statement of principles. Unfortunately, many of them show the wear of time. The tax articles, especially, have undergone erosion through the impact of changed conditions and the human tendency to be guided by expediency when dealing with the harsh realities of revenue requirements. BACKGROUND OF DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Our War of Independence was not merely a struggle against British domination; it was a social revolution as well. It came during a period of ferment, when thinking people were reexamining the principles of government and when political and economic theories were undergoing drastic change. -
State Librarians of Iowa 1837
State Librarians of Iowa 1837 - 2008 Compiled by Karon S. King Library Resource Technician State Library of Iowa 1112 East Grand Avenue Des Moines, Iowa 50319 2008 1 This list of State Librarians of Iowa, along with their photos or portraits, and brief biographies, was prepared for the March 2008 celebration of the 100th anniversary of the State Library’s move from the 2nd floor of the State Capitol into the east wing of the State Historical Memorial and Art Building on March 1908 (renamed the Ola Babcock Miller Building in 2002). Sources used for the biographies and portraits or photos are listed on each librarian’s page. Two main sources were used to create the list of State Librarians: Brigham, Johnson. “Pioneer History of the Territorial and State Library of Iowa.” Annals of Iowa Oct 1912: 482-538 and Gue, Benjamin F. History of Iowa from the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century, vol.3. New York: Century History Co.,1903, p.457-458. State Librarians of Iowa Wisconsin Territory James Clarke (1837) Iowa Territory Theodore S. Parvin (1838 – 1839) Charles Weston (1839 – 1840) Morgan Reno (1840 – 1845) State of Iowa (joined the Union December 28, 1846) Lemuel B. Patterson (1846 – 1851) Israel Kister (1851 – 1852) Martin L. Morris (1852 – 1855) John Pattee (1855 – 1858) John P. Coulter (1858 – 1860) Lewis I. Coulter , son of John P. Coulter (1860 – 1868) John C. Merrill (1869 – Sept. 1871, when he died) Ada E. North ( 1872 – 1877) Sara B. Maxwell (1878 – 1888) Mary H. Miller (1888 – 1894) Laura C. -
Maryland Constitution with Amendments to January 1, 2015
CONSTITUTIONS Maryland Constitution with Amendments to January 1, 2015 and the Constitution of the United States of America January 2015 The Office of Policy Analysis and Legislative Document Management of the Department of Legislative Services General Assembly of Maryland prepared this document. For further information concerning this document contact: Library and Information Services Office of Policy Analysis Department of Legislative Services 90 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Baltimore Area: (410-946-5400) Washington Area: (301-970-5400) Other Areas: (1-800-492-7122) TTY: (410-946-5401) (301-970-5401) TTY users may also call the Maryland Relay Service to contact the General Assembly. E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://mgaleg.maryland.gov The Department of Legislative Services does not discriminate on the basis of age, ancestry, color, creed, marital status, national origin, race, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability in the admission or access to its programs, services, or activities. The Department’s Information Officer has been designated to coordinate compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Section 35.107 of the Department of Justice Regulations. Requests for assistance should be directed to the Information Officer at the telephone numbers shown above. Contents Maryland Constitution ............................................................................... 1 Declaration of Rights ................................................................................ -
Gthe Emancipation of Slaves
The Emancipation of Slaves in Civil-War Maryland: An American Epic Scott Harrison Ness Haverford College Senior History Thesis Spring 2008 Advisors: Emma Lapsansky-Werner and Sharon Ullman Acknowledgements My advisors, Emma Lapsansky-Werner and Sharon Ullman, played integral roles in both the shaping and execution of this thesis. Without their patience and enthusiasm, I would never have made it this far. My parents provided moral support during this yearlong ordeal, without which I would have likely driven myself insane. My father, a former history major himself and knowledgeable about the history of Maryland, provided the initial inspiration to examine this period in the state’s past, and introduced me to the Maryland Historical Society. My mother read every draft before submission and offered constructive feedback and criticism (often deservedly harsh). For this, words cannot express my sincere gratitude. This thesis is lovingly dedicated to my cat Annie. Neither blue nor grey, she is the quintessential lost Marylander who struggled to find a place in the divisive country. 1 Table of Contents Introduction ...………………………………………………...3 Chapter 1 Slavery and Civil War in Maryland: A State Torn …...............................................7 Chapter 2 The Invention of Language ………………...18 Chapter 3 1863: A Turning Point in Maryland Politics ……………………………………...32 Chapter 4 1864: Freedom and Reelection ……………..55 Conclusion …………………………………………………..68 Bibliography ………………………………………………...74 2 Introduction The coming [constitutional and] Presidential [elections are] not…mere [contests] between political parties to determine whose candidate and whose adherents shall exercise power during the next four years. [They are wars] of ideas, [contests] of principles. It is a question of National unity or of dissolution…If the people realize their danger, as we have reason to believe they do, victory will again perch upon the banners of the Union.1 The Baltimore American published this plea for voters to exercise their electoral responsibilities on October 6, 1864. -
A Great Judicial Character, Roger Brooke Taney'
YALE LAW JOURNAL. A GREAT JUDICIAL CHARACTER, ROGER BROOKE TANEY' The history of the Judiciary of a country ought to be as instructive as that of its sovereigns or its zoldiers, and yet it is slighted by the ordinary chronicler who finds the back stair gossip of the palace or the blare and jingle of the camp more engaging to his pen than the sober story of the high but sometimes frigid development of Justice and its administration. For us American Lawyers in one hundred and thirty-two years of national exis- tence, its course is illustrated and its needs and achievements personified in the seven men who have held and administered the great office of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, omitting those titular holders of the office who took no substantial part in its administration, like Rutlege who failed of confirmation on account of loss of reason which was deemed to incapacitate him. First in the honorable procession comes John Jay of New York, of Huguenot blood, who at thirty years of age was serving the revolutionists as a member of the committee of correspondence with the European friends of American Liberty, especially in the negotiations with France; later, resigning from the Continental Congress to serve in that of his province of New York. He was two years minister to Spain. With Franklin and Adams later he successfully negotiated peace -with Great Britain. Five years he was Secretary for Foreign Affairs and then was appointed by Washington the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States in 1789. -
Innovations from America's Best Small Libraries
Welcome! The webinar will begin at 2:00 Eastern/11:00 Pacific Audio Tips Today’s audio is streaming to your computer’s speakers or headphones. Too loud or soft? Adjust volume level in the Audio broadcast box: Lost all sound? Hear an echo? Select Leave Audio Broadcast or click X to close box(es). Then rejoin. Need Help? Please post technical support questions into the Q&A Panel. Step 1: Type problem in the dialog box. Step 2: Click Send. Chat Etiquette Use Chat to talk with attendees and presenters about the topic. Do not post technical questions to Chat. And if you’re tweeting, use this hashtag: #bestsmlib Telephone Access If you not able to listen via your computer, you may join by phone. Step 1: Click on Request under the participants list. Step 2: Call the toll-free number provided. Step 3: Enter “#” following Access Code and Attendee ID. Customize your experience Panels can be minimized or expanded Hover over edge of panels to drag and resize Remember to post to Q&A panel if you need technical assistance. Other Technical problems? Contact WebEx support Event Number: 717 852 924 Phone: 1-866-229-3239 Co-Produced by: Co-Produced by: Jennifer Peterson Kendra Morgan WebJunction WebJunction Community Manager, Senior Programs ARSL Board Member Manager Thanks to the generous support of the following state library agencies, WebJunction offers webinar programs for free to all who wish to attend: Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records State Library of Kansas Connecticut State Library Maine State Library Florida Department of State’s -
State Constitutional Law for Maryland Lawyers: Judicial Relief for Violations of Rights Charles A
University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 10 Article 4 Issue 1 Fall 1980 1980 State Constitutional Law for Maryland Lawyers: Judicial Relief for Violations of Rights Charles A. Rees University of Baltimore School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rees, Charles A. (1980) "State Constitutional Law for Maryland Lawyers: Judicial Relief for Violations of Rights," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 10: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol10/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOR MARYLAND LAWYERS: JUDICIAL RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS Charles A. Reest This article examines and compares Maryland and federal constitutionallaw regardingaccess to judicial relief for vio- lations of individual civil rights. The author collects the significant constitutional provisions, statutes, and cases and provides a framework for analyzing possible obstacles to judicial relief when constitutionalissues are presented in state or federal court I. INTRODUCTION An earlier article in this law review1 compared provisions regard- ing individual rights of a civil nature in the Constitution of Maryland with related provisions in the Constitution of the United States. The present article is a comparative study of access to civil judicial reliefP for violations of those individual rights and the limitations on that access under the state and federal constitutions, related statutes, rules, and common law.