TMLL Guide Chapter 9
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
16-1423 Ortiz V. United States (06/22/2018)
Summary 6/25/2018 1:41:01 PM Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: 16-1423_new 16-1423 71 pages (394 KB) 71 pages (394 KB) 6/25/2018 1:40:53 PM 6/25/2018 1:40:53 PM Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 43. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content. indicates pages were changed. indicates pages were moved. file://NoURLProvided[6/25/2018 1:41:22 PM] (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus ORTIZ v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES No. 16–1423. Argued January 16, 2018—Decided June 22, 2018 Congress has long provided for specialized military courts to adjudicate charges against service members. Today, courts-martial hear cases involving crimes unconnected with military service. They are also subject to several tiers of appellate review, and thus are part of an in- tegrated “court-martial system” that resembles civilian structures of justice. That system begins with the court-martial itself, a tribunal that determines guilt or innocence and levies punishment, up to life- time imprisonment or execution. -
May 17, 2020 the Honorable Larry Hogan Governor of Maryland 100 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1925 Dear Governor
May 17, 2020 The Honorable Larry Hogan Governor of Maryland 100 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1925 Dear Governor Hogan: We write on behalf of the Prince George’s County House and Senate Delegations. While we appreciate the hard work you and your Administration have done thus far, we write with grave concern about the status of coronavirus in Maryland, particularly in Prince George’s County, and your recently announced plans to reopen, which, in our view, are not justified by, data, facts or your own previously-stated metrics and roadmap to recovery. Furthermore, we are alarmed at your Administration’s silence and lack of response to urgent requests from Prince George’s County, the hardest hit jurisdiction in the State—these requests being made earnestly in an effort to protect Prince Georgians and save lives. In an April 30, 2020 letter, Prince George’s County Executive, Angela Alsobrooks, wrote your liaison, Steve Schuh, as follow-up from a discussion about the County’s needs, including increased hospital capacity, expanded testing, improved contact tracing, and increased supplies of personal protective equipment. If we are all “Maryland Strong” then we must be responsive, coordinated, and all must work together. Regarding hospital capacity, we appreciate your decision to re-open parts of Laurel Regional Hospital and providing 135 additional beds, but your Administration has not responded to requests for additional medical tents and critical care staffing needs in portions of the County urgently at need. When the State decided against opening a facility at the Prince George’s Sports and Learning Complex in Landover, the County was promised additional medical tents, however, the state reneged on its promise and the County never received a response. -
Why the Proposed Maryland Constitution Was Not Approved
William & Mary Law Review Volume 10 (1968-1969) Issue 2 Article 6 December 1968 Why the Proposed Maryland Constitution Was Not Approved Thomas G. Pullen Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Repository Citation Thomas G. Pullen Jr., Why the Proposed Maryland Constitution Was Not Approved, 10 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 378 (1968), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol10/iss2/6 Copyright c 1968 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr WHY THE PROPOSED MARYLAND CONSTITUTION WAS NOT APPROVED THOMAS G. PULLEN, JR.* The people of Maryland simply did not want a new constitution so they went to the polls on May 14, 1968, and turned down the proposed constitution by a majority of more than 80,000. The apathy of the voters toward a new constitution was really expressed in the election held on September 13, 1966, when they approved the calling of a con- stitutional convention by a vote of 166,617 "for" and 31,692 "against," while in a concurrent primary election the vote was 609,747 of a total voter registration of 1,396,060. Obviously, interest in a new constitution was relatively slight. One of the most serious mistakes made by the proponents of a new constitution was to hold the vote on calling a constitutional convention at the same time as a primary election. The proponents probably thought the people would vote in greater numbers for the constitutional conven- tion if they were at the polls in a popular election; however, the converse was true. -
List of Abbreviations
List of Abbreviations A. C. Appeal Cases, English Law Reports, r8gr-. Aetas de las Sesiones Aetas de las Sesiones del Congreso Sud-Amer icano de Derecho Internacional Privado, Buenos Aires, r88g. Adl. Clem. Sammlung von Entscheidungen zum Handels gesetzbuch, zusammengestellt von Adler und Clemens, fortgesetzt von Friedlander (Austria). Ala. Alabama Reports. All E. R. All England Law Reports, Annotated. Allg. BGB. Allgemeines Biirgerliches Gesetzbuch (Aus- tria). Allg. HGB. Allgemeines Handelsgesetzbuch (Austria). All g. W echselord- Allgemeine Wechselordnung (Germany). nung A. L. R. American Law Reports, Annotated. Am. Dec. American Decisions ( Select Cases) . Am. J. Int. Law American Journal of International Law. Am. Jur. American Jurisprudence. San Francisco, New York, 1936-. Am. Marit. Cas. American Maritime Cases. Am. Rep. American Reports. Annales de Droit Annales de droit commercial et industriel Commercial fran~ais, etranger et international, fondees par M. E. Thaller, Paris, r887-. Ann. Cas. American Annotated Cases. Annuaire Annuaire de l'Institut de droit international. Annual Digest Annual Digest of Public International Law Cases, London. Annual Survey Annual Survey of American Law, New York University School of Law. Annuario Dir. Camp. Annuario di diritto comparato e di studi legis lativi. App. Cour d'appel; corti d'appello. App. Cas. Appeal Cases, English Law Reports, 1876- r8go. xxxi XXXll LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS App. D.C. Appeal Cases, District of Columbia. App. Div. New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Reports. Arch. Civ. Prax. Archiv fiir die civilistische Praxis (Germany) . Arch. Jud. Archivo judiciario (Brazil). Ariz. Arizona Reports. Ark. Arkansas Reports. Asp. Marit. Cas. Aspinall's Maritime Cases. Atl. Atlantic Reporter, National Reporter System (United States). -
A Guide to Civil Lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado
Civil Lawsuit Guide – Eff. Jan. 1, 2020 A Guide to Civil Lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Disclaimer: The contents of this guide are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. 1 | Page Civil Lawsuit Guide – Eff. Jan. 1, 2020 Welcome. The judges and staff of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado welcome you, for whatever reason brings you to the federal trial court for Colorado – whether you are a participant in a lawsuit, have been called as a witness in a case, have been summoned as a juror, or are a supportive family member or friend and are visiting any of the courthouses of the District of Colorado. The court’s judicial officers, the staff of the court, members of the bar, and the court community share the same goals as those expressed by the late Chief Judge Alfred A. Arraj (after whom the newest federal courthouse in Denver is named) on the day of his taking the oath of office as the sixth U.S. District Judge for Colorado: “I embark on this new career with a sense of humility, but with a firm and steadfast resolution to administer justice punctually and impartially without regard to the race, the creed or the station in life of the litigants who may appear in the court over which I may preside.” TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1 - Introduction – Is this Guide for You? .......................................................... 3 Part 2 - Before you File your Lawsuit: Things to Know. ........................................ 7 Part 3 - How to Start Your Lawsuit. -
19-1189 BP PLC V. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus BP P. L. C. ET AL. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19–1189. Argued January 19, 2021—Decided May 17, 2021 Baltimore’s Mayor and City Council (collectively City) sued various en- ergy companies in Maryland state court alleging that the companies concealed the environmental impacts of the fossil fuels they promoted. The defendant companies removed the case to federal court invoking a number of grounds for federal jurisdiction, including the federal officer removal statute, 28 U. S. C. §1442. The City argued that none of the defendants’ various grounds for removal justified retaining federal ju- risdiction, and the district court agreed, issuing an order remanding the case back to state court. Although an order remanding a case to state court is ordinarily unreviewable on appeal, Congress has deter- mined that appellate review is available for those orders “remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1442 or 1443 of [Title 28].” §1447(d). The Fourth Circuit read this provision to authorize appellate review only for the part of a remand order deciding the §1442 or §1443 removal ground. -
WI-578 Governor E. E. Jackson House, the Oaks,Site
WI-578 Governor E. E. Jackson House, The Oaks,site Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 08-29-2003 WI-578 1883-84, 1905 The Oaks Salisbury (Site) Private The last decades of the nineteenth century were particularly prosperous ones for the citizens of Salisbury, who had built up over the course of twenty years the largest commercial, industrial, and trading center on the peninsula south of Wilmington, Delaware. The most ambitious domestic construction project during the early 1880s was the design and assemblage of the sprawling Shingle-style mansion for Elihu Emory Jackson and Nellie Rider Jackson on a large parcel of land bordering North Division and West Isabella streets. -
STATE ADVISORY COUNCIL QUALITY CARE at the END-OF-LIFE Paul Ballard Paul Ballard Is an Assistant Attorney General Who Is Counsel
STATE ADVISORY COUNCIL QUALITY CARE AT THE END-OF-LIFE Paul Ballard Paul Ballard is an Assistant Attorney General who is Counsel for Health Decisions Policy for the Attorney General. He also advises the Department of Health’s Office of Health Care Quality, which agency licenses and regulates all the health care programs and facilities in the State of Maryland. Prior to performing his present duties, Mr. Ballard has been Counsel to various health occupation licensing boards, including the Dental, Pharmacy, Physical Therapy, Psychology, Social Work and Acupuncture Boards. Before being assigned to the Department of Health, he was an Assistant Attorney General with the Maryland Department of Transportation. In 2005, he received the Attorney General’s Exceptional Service Award. He has been practicing law since 1987. Mr. Ballard graduated summa cum laude from Morgan State University, where he majored in philosophy. He received a Master of Arts degree in counseling psychology from Loyola College in Maryland and earned his Juris Doctor degree from the University of Baltimore School of Law. Tiffany Callender Ms. Callender is a Senior Program Officer at the Horizon Foundation, a local health philanthropy. At the Foundation Ms. Callender manages initiatives that improve access to quality health care. This includes overseeing a public campaign to encourage advance care planning, with a particular focus on providing resources to help residents begin end-of-life conversations with their loved ones and to appoint health care agents. She also manages the Foundation’s mental health programs. Along with her work in advance care planning, Ms. Callender brings a blend of clinical experience and a foundation in project management and strategic planning. -
Report of the Maryland Heritage Committee to the Governor and General Assembly of Maryland
Report of the Maryland Heritage Committee to the Governor and General Assembly of Maryland Maryland celebrates 350 years MARYLAND HERITAGE COMMITTEE March, 1985 On the Occasion of Maryland’s 350th Birthday from the Ark of refuge, from the Dove of peace, we have become. we celebrate three hundred fifty years of learning. turning watermen and women, hill folk and city, into citizens. safe now and at peace in this proud state named for a woman we blend our brown and yellow, red and black and white into a greater We. Maryland, heiress to refuge and to peace. We celebrate. We praise. by Lucille Clifton Poet Laureate of Maryland This book was composed in Caslon 540 text and display type by Brushwood Graphics Studio from a design by Carleton ‘B’ Hayek. It was printed by the Collins Lithographing & Printing Company, Inc. 20C71453 Report of The MARYLAND HERITAGE COMMITTEE Annapolis March 29, 1985 Report of the Maryland Heritage Committee to the Governor and General Assembly of Maryland Peoples and nations pause occasionally to celebrate their gods, their heroes and victories, their origins and successes. Maryland first celebrated its founding in 1834 and has continued to do so in 50 year intervals. The pattern for celebrating thus established, Maryland was ready as 1984 approached to look back with pride on 350 years of political, social and cultural achievement. As in previous an- niversaries, the celebration of the past became an affirmation of the future. To prepare the state for its 1984 celebration, the 1982 General Assembly of Maryland passed a resolution (Appendix i) creating the 350 Coordinating Com- mittee which subsequently became the Maryland Heritage Committee. -
Courts at a Glance
Courts at a Glance For Everyone From Students to Seniors Published by Iowa Judicial Branch Branches of American Government Separation of Powers The governmental system of the United States uses separation of powers. This means that the government has separate branches that deal with different as- pects of governing. These three branches are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This system is in place for both the federal (national) and state governments. The legislative branch, which on the national level is the U.S. Congress, passes new laws. The executive branch, headed by the president, enforces laws. The judicial branch, headed by the U.S. Supreme Court, inter- prets laws. While each branch has its own duties, the other branches of govern- ment have some control over its actions. These interactions are called checks and balances. Checks and balances keep one branch of government from being much stronger than the others. See the diagram below for U.S. checks and balances. U.S. Checks & Balances Confirms or rejects appointments by executive (including judges) Can veto legislation Apppoints judges È È È È Legislative Executive Judicial Writes laws Enforces laws Interprets laws Ç Ç Can declare acts of the legislative or executive branch to be unconstitutional Role of the Judicial Branch Every state and the federal government have an independent judicial branch to interpret and apply state and federal laws to specific cases. By providing a place where people can go to resolve disputes according to law, through a fair process, and before a knowledgeable and neutral judge or jury, the judicial branch helps to maintain peace and order in society. -
710 ATLANTIC REPORTER, 2D SERIES N. J. Suspensions. As
450 N. J. 710 ATLANTIC REPORTER, 2d SERIES suspensions. As modified, the judgment of of funding public schools, students chal- the Appellate Division is affirmed. lenged constitutionality of funding plan de- veloped by state in response to judicial For modification and affirmance—Chief mandate. The Supreme Court found plan Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, facially constitutional but unconstitutional as POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN applied to special needs districts (SNDs), and COLEMAN—7. ordered parity funding as interim remedy, Opposed–none. and remanded for fact-finding hearings, 149 N.J. 145, 693 A.2d 417. Following conduct , of fact-finding hearings by the Superior Court, Chancery Division, King, J., and sub- mission of Report and Recommendation 153 N.J. 480 with respect thereto, the Supreme Court, S 480Raymond ABBOTT, a minor, by his Handler, J., held that: (1) elementary school Guardian Ad Litem, Frances ABBOTT; reform plan proposed by state education Arlene Figueroa, Frances Figueroa, and finance officials comported substantially Hector Figueroa, Orlando Figueroa, and with statutory and regulaStory481 policies de- Vivian Figueroa, minors, by their fining constitutional guarantee of thorough Guardian Ad Litem, Blanca Figueroa; and efficient education; (2) full-day kinder- Michael Hadley, a minor, by his Guard- garten plan comported substantially with ian Ad Litem, Lola Moore; Henry Ste- same statutory and regulatory policies and vens, Jr., a minor, by his Guardian Ad was essential to satisfaction of constitutional Litem, -
Report of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts 2005
‘05 in Brief (listed chronologically) Pennsylvania’s minor court jurists, formerly called district judges, become known as magisterial district judges Report of the Chief Justice Ralph J. Administrative Office of Cappy forms the Pennsylvania Courts Interbranch Commis- sion for Gender, Racial 2005 and Ethnic Fairness to promote the equal application of the law for all citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Supreme Court adopts Rules of Juvenile Procedure to establish for the first time uniform statewide procedures in juvenile courts that apply to all phases of delinquency cases that enter the state court system Justice Max Baer participates in “Changing Lives by Changing Systems: National Judicial Leadership Summit for Supreme Court of Pennsylvania the Protection of Chief Justice Ralph J. Cappy Children,” to work Justice Ronald D. Castille toward reforming the Justice Sandra Schultz Newman way abused and Justice Thomas G. Saylor neglected children’s Justice J. Michael Eakin cases proceed through Justice Max Baer the courts Justice Cynthia A. Baldwin Supreme Court issues order authorizing disciplinary pro- ceedings to be open to public review Pennsylvania begins development of a statewide education program for trial court judges who hear capital murder cases. The program, devel- oped with the Nevada- based National Judicial College, will be among the first of its kind in the nation. Kate Ford Elliott is elected president judge of Superior Court, becoming the first woman in Pennsyl- vania to lead an appellate court Title: (AOPC_Black.EPS)