Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Pyrrhonism and Cartesianism – Episode: External World and Aliens

Pyrrhonism and Cartesianism – Episode: External World and Aliens

CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary department, CEU In fulfillment partial ofrequirements the for

References Conclusion questions interesting and some epistemologically 3., externalworld ofthe and the concerns ,2.Hypothetical practical aoflife way theory and : and practical 1.Methodological Introduction ofAbbreviationsList ofContentsTable ofContentsTable ofTable Contents

include the externalworld the include to oftheir the Pyrrhonistsskepticism could analysisscope 2.2. An expand ofwhether world ofthe external forPyrrhonists the questioning existence explanation not 2.1. An Cartesianism: external ...... world and aliens ...... n i f f i r G s n a V l e a h c i M : r o s i v r e p u s ...... Pyrrhonism andPyrrhonism ...... degree of Masters Arts of by Tamara Rendulic by TamaraRendulic ...... 2012 ....

21 18 13 38 37 27

6 4 3 2 1 CEU eTD Collection

References Conclusion questions interesting and some epistemologically 3.Pyrrhonism, Cartesianism externalworld ofthe existence and the concerns doubt,2.Hypothetical practical aoflife way theory and skepticism: and practical 1.Methodological Introduction ofAbbreviationsList ofTable Contents 2

include the externalworld the include to oftheir the Pyrrhonistsskepticism could analysisscope 2.2. An expand ofwhether world ofthe external forPyrrhonists the questioning existence explanation not 2.1. An ......

38 37 27 21 18 13

6 4 3 CEU eTD Collection HR: Rene Descartes, HR: Rene M: SextusEmpiricus, SextusEmpiricus,PH: of AbbreviationsList 3 Philosophical WorksPhilosophical Adversus MathematicosAdversus Outlines of Pyrrhonism Outlines CEU eTD Collection dogmatists. dogmatists. anti– rather but skeptics, real the be to not Pyrrhonists by considered also were Academics known, be could nothing that prove to was agenda their Since Academy. ’s of phases the of one in developed was which skepticism, Academic is school skeptical other The limits. unnecessary to skepticism pushed who skeptic radical a as consider rather would they who , with common in much have not do Pyrrhonists name, the except Still, Pyrrhonism. – him after name its got one), other the of members the unlike skeptics, themselves called actually members (whose movements skeptical ancient two of One skepticism. Greek ancient as known today is what of founder the be to considered is BC) 272 c. – 360 (c. Elis of Pyrrho Introduction 4 University Press, 2ndedition. Cambridge 1 terms ofepistemology. havein does power still serious it Cartesianism, of scope the into falls which all cover to expanded be cannot or can skepticism the of skepticism. Cartesian one than wide less as skepticism Pyrrhonian of scope the concerns which debates Montaigne by philosophy Western Empiricus’ Sextus is source main the

Annas, J. and J. Barnes (ed. and 2000,Sextus (ed. trans.), J.and J.Barnes Annas, Empiricus, In this thesis, I argue about some of the points of Pyrrhonian thought, for which for thought, Pyrrhonian of points the of some about argue will I thesis, this In times. ancient since thought philosophical in present been have attitudes Skeptical

My aim is to claim that regardless of the fact that scope of Pyrrhonian of scope that fact the of regardless that claim to is aim My . . I will focus my attention on the segment of contemporary of segment the on attention my focus will I Outlines of Pyrrhonism of Outlines Outlines of Scepticism. of Outlines 1 , , and which is reinforced into reinforced is which and Cambridge:

CEU eTD Collection sense. epistemological relevant, the in them, between important one reflecting are which Cartesianism and Pyrrhonism of characteristics some indicate will I end, the At principle. in even possible is expansion that whether as well as scope, its expanded not has skepticism Pyrrhonian why of analysis an provide will I Afterwards, points. skeptical Cartesian 5 In what follows, I will firstly discuss the differences in motivations of Pyrrhonian and Pyrrhonian of motivations in differences the discuss firstly will I follows, what In

CEU eTD Collection something that is worthless and easy to dismiss, so in a way has a function of a straw man. straw a of function a has way a in so dismiss, to easy and worthless is that something just or overbidding, for task hard a as notifications skeptical take to going is it whether theory a to up is it course, Of theories. their of validity the recheck or improve them make to order in philosophers toward directed force pushing a as insights skeptical consider many Namely, skepticism. oppose who those and defend who those of debates by framed is whole the that say could skepticism. of forms various to respect with shaped are theories epistemological of number great the that is fact the challenges, skeptical with accordance 6 2 foundations’ the from right again start and completely everything ‘demolish to required is it certain, be to appear only which opinions these eliminate to order In indubitable. and certain genuinely are which ones gain could he so opinions, preconceived the all of rid get to is idea His . for basis infallible an find to order in doubt methodical of project his starts Descartes Namely, skepticism. ‘methodological’ Descartes’ is enterprise an such of example known well The to theory epistemological respectable a for skepticism. ignore completely unlikely highly is it another, or way One

Decartes, R.1996. R.1996. Decartes, 1. Furthermore, skepticism can be used for attaining a positive epistemological theory. epistemological positive a attaining for used be can skepticism Furthermore, theoretical. highly is skepticism’ ‘modern as known is what of role the Nowadays, in revised or demands, skeptical surpass to order in formed are they Whether life Methodological and practical theory skepticism: and awayof 2 . Descartes’ idea is to use the fact that our beliefs are organized in a in organized are beliefs our that fact the use to is idea Descartes’ .

on First Philosophyon First , p.17

Generally speaking, one speaking, Generally

CEU eTD Collection opeey dvtd t t n adto o ti, i s a cmo lc o contemporary for place common a is specialized. be it to skepticism this, to addition In it. to devoted completely some that showing and him against weapons doubt’. any reasonable are immune to own skeptic’s the ‘turning is he since skeptics’, the ‘against going is who one the as Descartes describes Curley that, of Because anti-skeptical. completely is goal his that true also is it but goal, his achieve to equipment skeptical uses he that true is It orientation. skeptical a of philosopher a considered be should built. be can knowledge of building the which on foundations reliable and firm with provided is one doubted, be to impossible are which beliefs some are there beliefs basic these among that out turns it however, If, well. as doubted be to are them on based beliefs the all that means which beliefs, basic these about raise to way a find to is mission His beliefs. other all underlie which beliefs are there that and interdependent, and interrelated be to as way 7 4 3 exempted be to seem that things some are there Still, skepticism. of application global the of example an to be is supposed Pyrrhonism respect, In this skepticism. their scope of the into falls stance theoretical of kind any Namely, knowledge. of kind any doubt to hesitate not do of types different all doubt who without exemptions. knowledge, skeptics, dedicated fully of existence the is very common not is actually What on. so are and there skeptics, so cognitive ethical, deny, mathematical, or religious, question they that knowledge of types different with accordance Hankinson, R. Hankinson, J.1995. M. Curley, E. 1978. Pyrrhonists, or ancient skeptics, are supposed to be these devoted skeptics, since they since skeptics, devoted these be to supposed are skeptics, ancient or Pyrrhonists, be to not but skepticism of benefits some use to impossible not is it Obviously, himself Descartes that say to hard is it skeptical, is method his though even Thus, Descartes Against the Skeptics Against Descartes The Sceptics 4 These local, thematically specified skepticisms are framed in framed are skepticisms specified thematically local, These , p.17 ., p. ix ., p.ix 3

CEU eTD Collection non-theoretical lives. inwords: Or, Burnyeat’s non-theoretical real, their in theoretizings their include to general in today of skeptics for uncommon is it fact, In theory. of out life a with accordance in position own its adjusting in interest much too have not does skepticism, modern the of representative true a as Cartesianism, life, ordinary of affairs with occupied much pretty is Pyrrhonism While life. everyday approach they which in way a is traditions two these between difference big first The it. by achieve to hope they that aims in as well as positions, their build they which in manner they a in Still, differ do skepticisms. definitely their apply they which to matters of range large very a common to scopewhat Pyrrhonismquestion. infails doubtits Cartesian includes one, since ‘universal’ the or project, skeptical radical most the as appreciated usually is Cartesianism this, with line In 2. chapter in on, later discuss will I that these is it and attention, Pyrrhonians’ from h aa ta r hw o b o-vdn. Te ifrain wih ae cniee by 8 considered are which The non-evident. be 5 to shown are that data the or mind’ of ‘tranquility gain to terms life.Pyrrhonists’ in is, (that peacefully live to order in Namely, of guidance as stances their used they because exactly ones ‘genuine’ as known are skeptics ancient ‘historical’, the approach, skeptical theoretical purely obviously this, Unlike Burnyeat, M. F. 1998. “The Skeptic in His Place and Time”, M.F.HisPlacep. 92 in Skeptic Burnyeat, and 1998.“The , he he way Either life. of business ordinary the in with reckoned be to needs that worry a not worry, philosophical or theoretical strictly a course of is this that willcontend but sabbatical come, year’s next that the of the doubting, an for or about, argument puzzlement a fact in is time, of the doubting for argument any or time, of the about puzzlement any that agree may he Alternatively, doubt. in actually is year next the of arrival the that suppose not does He sabbatical. year’s next during problem on the workto grant research a for applies he real?’, time ‘Is or time?’ ‘What’s question philosophical the answer cannot he finds philosopher a if nowdays, in have do Cartesianism, and Pyrrhonism approaches, skeptical two these However, insulates which is the main goal of Pyrrhonian skepticism), one is supposed to reject all reject to supposed is one skepticism), Pyrrhonian of goal main the is which his ordinary first order judgments from the effects ofhisphilosophizing. the effects first from order judgments hisordinary 5

CEU eTD Collection Namely, Pyrrhonists think that for every non–phenomenal claim, if they are devoted enough devoted are they if claim, non–phenomenal every for that think Pyrrhonists Namely, is claims to to areSextus: possess. supposed ability’According they that a ‘distinctive through dogmatists these into interest their out carrying Pyrrhonists which in way The In Sextuswords: beliefs. of types two are there sense, this In things. these of appearances the with contrast the or non-evident, as Pyrrhonists 9 7 6 in are they that i.e. balanced, equally are they that means terms of Pyrrhonists’ in This accepted. worthy equally are offered reasons the of all that realize should one when point the is That true. is reasons conflicting these of which decide to impossible becomes it Furthermore, obvious. becomes them between conflict the explicated, are reasons and these for Once it. reasons against (un)persuasive equally find to able be will they inquires, undergoing in PH 18 PH 113 PH isosthenia e ma vr oe eaie y s ad w s h od word the use we and us, by examined one every mean we ( argument every to that say we when and judgment of suspension to first come to tranquility.afterwards we accounts, and objects opposed the in equipollence the of because which, by ability an all, are at way and any in appear of thought which things among oppositions out to ability an is skepticism does Skeptic assent to anything the For not non-evident. . the by investigated matter non-evident some to assent is that say some which in sense the in beliefs have not does Skeptic the that say we Rather, cool).” (or warm not am I think ”I say not would cooled or warmed when skeptic the example, For appearance. an with accordance in him on forced conditions the to assents Skeptic the For something. in acquiescing is belief that say some which in sense general more the in “belief” using not are we beliefs have not does skeptic the that say we When ulfcto, bt a oehn hc salse oehn omtcly (i.e. dogmatically something establishes which something as but qualification, . Morethoroughly by expressed Sextus: 7

, are about to claim what is the ‘real’ nature of things, in things, of nature ‘real’ the is what claim to about are , ) an equal argument is opposed, by ‘every’ by opposed, is argument equal an ) 6 lgs ‘logos’ o without not

CEU eTD Collection position, as well as neither affirm nor deny it, but only suspend their judgment onit. judgment onlytheir it, affirmsuspend but nordeny well as neither as position, of state the to Pyrrhonists drags arguments of equipollence the that say to is This inquiry. of matter the on judgment their suspend will Pyrrhonists other, each cancel mutually and balanced, be to seem position roughly some against and for provided will arguments and evidence the I all If chapter. third the which in present arguing, of ways inquiry, or the ‘tropes’ in of set options whole the a all developed approached Pyrrhonists critically have they that sure be to order In 10 9 8 by Sextus: connected. causally but logically, not are these that said be should it than described, be to is relations these of character the If unexpectedly. completely isostheneia that way of state the in up end will he matter, certain a on judgment his suspends Pyrrhonist the once Namely, Hanckinson, The skeptics, p.27 The Hanckinson, 1202-3 PH h euto h the of result The the affected. iswhatperson appears to which ( avowal an rather is but dogmatic not is the of utterance the thus it’; of lack the and conviction of respect in first the to equal is which and dogmatically, something establish another to attempts it which argument to opposed is there dogmatically something establish to attempts which me by examined argument every to that me to seems ‘it effect in mean I opposed’ is argument equal an argument every ‘to say I whenever So, me’. to seems it ‘as supply implicitly we and ‘conflict’; of sense general its in ‘oppose’ mean we it; of lack the or conviction to respect with ‘equal’ say We might. it howsoever but conclusion, a and premises of means by necessarily not it establishing and non-evident), the concerning ataraxia, ataraxia, epohe isl firstly , follows and he will not worry about whether a position is true or false. In the same the In false. or true is position a whether about worry not will he and ph,epohe, isosthenia, ataraxia ataraxia isosthenia, ph epohe epohe n then and . Unlike Cartesian skeptics, Pyrrhonists do not doubt some doubt not do Pyrrhonists skeptics, Cartesian Unlike . should be the freedom from all the mental disturbances. mental the all from freedom the be should trxa ataraxia follows olw, ad ta oh o hs happen these of both that and follows, apangelia 8

epohe 9 An illustration of this is provided is this of illustration An . This means that after acquiring after that means This . ) of a human affection ( affection human a of ) pathos ),

CEU eTD Collection anxiety in the everyday life, their main concern is to question the achievements of these of achievements the question to is concern main their life, everyday the in anxiety and disturbances bring usually which ones the are nature hidden their gain to order in things of appearances beyond going of efforts the Pyrrhonists, to according Since resort. Pyrrhonian these supporting are which evidence and be willgained. happentruth not that may it alternatives, arguments the of strength the by compared and alternatives its with confronted not is claim a if – truth the for looking are they because claims dogmatist examine to motivated are they that is answer The inquires? their pursuing in dedicated so are Pyrrhonists come how not, or gained be will tranquility the whether know whether know cannot that advance in know or expect Pyrrhonists that not is it Thus, 11 p. 290 11 10 hypothesis’ ‘outrageous raising for need no is there Pyrrhonism in instance, For structures. their in differences entail traditions skeptical two these of aims Different one. theoretical character. practical isofa highly of dogmatists in Pyrrhonists’ideas Pyrrhonists So, be proved, then cannot putaside. them interest will these contrary, the on if, but them, adopt will Pyrrhonists true, are claims dogmatists’ of some that out turned it If philosophers. dogmatist of disputes or stances questioning towards are oriented Pyrrhonists why is This them. dismiss ungrounded, be to out turn they if and, efforts The expression that Williams uses in Williams, M. 2010. “Descartes transformation that the expression skeptical uses tradition”, Williams, of The in Williams M.2010.“Descartes 128 PH hs patcl oinain o yroim i lal poe o Cartesianism’s to opposed clearly is Pyrrhonism of orientation practical This peaceful perfectly wanted much very endanger to about are beliefs uncertain Simply, horse’sthe foam. on of sponge impression the produced the impact its and picture brush; his the from colors the at wiped he which flung and up gave he that aim his of short far so fell he foam, horse’s the represent to wished and horse a painting was he while that say they For painter. the of is alleged which that as case same the is in Skeptic the epohe 10

will take place as the result of their inquires. But, if they cannot they if But, inquires. their of result the as place take will ataraxia will happen. They happen. will 11 ,

CEU eTD Collection open for all kinds of possible scenarios. Descartes himself says: scenarios. forallDescarteshimself kindsofpossible open existing it concerns, so life tois real strictlyattached stance, isnot the as theoretical other hand, on the actually in engaging Cartesianism, dogmatists. by and raised been already have which inquiring challenges, and disagreements with settled goal, much its achieve pretty to order is In skepticism. Pyrrhonism Cartesian of mark trade a way a in are which 12 13 Pyrrho. a ascribed to literature livingis finest see points.Pyrrhonists dohavewaya that lifeits the will of strange which in later out We a 12 sanely. pretty that do to and things important many question to able sense this in it, are Pyrrhonists it, about Unlike theoretical. completely think may be Descartes whatever and, affairs, life common to the towards oriented is Pyrrhonism intended is doubt Cartesian the Obviously, HR II 206 II HR Pyrrhonian within not introduced thought seenwas the really it theDescartes point be that is This can where are for this more certain, and in actual truth better known byus. known better in actualtruth certain,and forthis reasonmore are clearly rejected, thus be cannot which things, is other certain that aware become it to us allow to obtain, can mind human the as so false, as them to reject even nay doubtful, as them treat refuse to to unreasonable which knowledge surest the is what matters such about doubted seriously announced I somewhere that reason this for was It precipices. down tumbling human from friends their by preserved be to had they that neglected affairs so who ridiculous quite were skeptics those and senses, the trust to not stupid be assuredly would it life, our regulating of case a is it when for, truth; into inquiry an and life our of activities practical the between any passages, various in me urge to unfit is that, admit cannot by emphasized distinction the note must we But, reply. a merits that them to objection or not will who he that meditations, my false, even nay, uncertain, My ht te etr etmn f te sne ut b osdrd t be to considered be must senses the of testimony entire the that is quite serious and so necessary for the comprehension of comprehension the for necessary so and serious quite is [HR I 142-3]; but when we raise an inquiry into inquiry an raise we when but 142-3]; I [HR that no one in his sound mind sound his in one no that 13

12

CEU eTD Collection dipped into the water as broken, while it is in fact whole. But illusions such as this one are one this as such illusions But whole. fact in is it while broken, as water the into dipped stick a perceive we that example for happens it that so deceitful, are senses our that notices to fact this uses he where doubt, Descartes methodological his of step first senses. the Illusion’, from ‘Argument our the introduce by misguided often are we that see to difficult not is it However, truth. the discovering in reliable are senses our that i.e. reliable, is senses our by gain we information the that assumption the on based are world external the about knowledge. preconceived our of portion greater a endangers accordingly and one, previous the on was it than level each on radical more becomes it reason, this For level. new every on doubt of the range Descartesreinforces gradually that issupposed progressive. This means towhich be 13 15 14 doubt, his of scope the expands then Descartes But, consideration. into takes Pyrhonism our of upsuchdelusions. successfully us, otherfix deluding that say senses may one could senses be one although so senses, other some of use possible, the is by ‘mask’ It this it. remove misperceive to however, we that so ‘masked’ way some in is perception of the object which in cases in just problematic are sensory illusive have we which in situations Thus, illusion. visual simple a as saw he what dismiss and whole, actually is stick the that feel to sense tactile his and hand his use case, this in can, one – dismiss to hard not Decartes, R. 1996. R. Decartes, B. Williams, 2005. 2. This first step of the Cartesian skeptical enterprise is not that different from the cases the from different that not is enterprise skeptical Cartesian the of step first This his of beginning very the At enquiry’ pure of ‘project his In worldexternal doubt,Hypothetical practical of concerns andexistence the the Meditations Descartes: TheProjectPure of Enquiry Descartes:

on First Philosophyon First 14 Meditations , Descartes introduces us to the three levels of doubt, of levels three the to us introduces Descartes , 15 , Descartes notes that all of our beliefs our of all that notes Descartes ,

CEU eTD Collection those about our own body, could be just a dream illusion. As Descartes writes: As justillusion. about body,a coulddream Descartes ourown be those including impression, perceptual every So, time. any at least, at or time, the all dreaming are we that be could it experiences, dreaming and waking these between difference intrinsic dream of objects some consider we no is there since furthermore, and, , that waking the to belonging i.e. real as experience possible is it Since obvious. completely be to take normally we that things the about even senses, our by deceived often are we in dreams that insight the with starts argument This hypothesis. ‘outrageous’ first of his and radicalization doubt, modern a represents which Argument’ ‘Dream famous his introducing 14 only 16 is of he scope which in the scenario the into dismiss to fall unable is not one since does Then, here. case ‘sometimes’ actual the that guarantees nothing and distinct, not are they sometimes least at or dreaming, when has he those from distinct qualitatively or intrinsically not are awakewhen has one experiences the because on experience, based this do to impossible is it Descartes to according But actualized. not is scenario dreaming the that i.e. dreaming to due there not are experiences his that show to able be to needs one case, the actually is what is experiences he what that believing in justified be to one for order in Thus, it. dreaming only sleep, at be can one or described, situation the perceive and awake, be can One way. one than more in fireplace the to next sitting is he that one to seem can it Namely, Decartes, R. 2008. R. Decartes, wakefulness from sleep that I am lost in sleepIam astonishment. that from wakefulness distinguish clearly may we which by so indications certain see no are I there that reflection manifestly this on been carefully sleep dwelling in in and have illusions, I similar occasions by many deceived on in But that this. myself all remind as I distinct this so over or thinking clear so appear not does sleep in asleep… happens not is What move I which head this that paper; this at looking am I that awake eyes with is it that me to seem indeed was does it moment I this At bed. in reality undressed lying in whilst fire, the near seated and dressed was I that place, particular this in myself found I that dreamt I night the in that me to happened it has often how Meditations

on First Philosophyon First . p.22 16

CEU eTD Collection the case in which there is no external world at all. isnoexternalworldat which there case in the in is it as same the exactly be would experience our that means This false. are make we world the of perceptions all since impressions, false Our us false. deliver always and would true faculties between reasoning distinguish to position the in never are we that way a such in world the in things arranges that deity deceiving ‘outrageous powerful a Cartesian be could there second hypothesis’, the represents which scenario, this to Genius ‘Evil According the Doubt’. as well-known doubt, ‘hyperbolical’ a introduces he level third the on why is This beliefs. these endanger to try to has project, his of idea main the with line in stay as well as world veridically. perceive we bethat noguarantee seems to words, thereother In applies. pointsame the by senses, information gains and worlds external the with deals one which in cases other all In fireplace. his to next armchair his in sitting he that believing in justified be cannot he dreaming, 15 whose things, whether concerned not are existsSextussays: ornot. instance, For actually questioned, are appearances Pyrrhonists that seems it But, be. to appear they as are really things if questioning is it since skepticism, essential as described usually is Pyrrhonism it, Unlike skepticism. existential as considered is Cartesianism why is This world. external the of existence very the doubting up end will he Descartes, by recommended affection, which is distinct from the object which makes it apparent. When I am I When honey existing apparent. externally the that conjecture I honey, it of application the by sweetened makes which object the from distinct is so which is everything affection, rather but itself, by perceived be to nature a of is nothing but is it as doubt, of levels presented these of all through goes devotedly one If Still, is sweet; and when I am warmed by proximity to fire, I infer from my own condition own my from infer I fire, to proximity by warmed am I when and sweet; is whether we are sleeping or not, concerning the existence of the external the of existence the concerning truths not, or sleeping are we whether arithmetical and geometrical truths remain the same. Descartes, in order to order in Descartes, same. the remain truths geometrical and arithmetical is

not deluded in believing that he is he that believing in deluded not via

CEU eTD Collection different situations …), but that is where resemblance stops, and Pyrrhonists do not go any go not do Pyrrhonists and stops, resemblance where is that but …), situations different senses of it making and doubt ‘stratified’. their deepening in continue Cartesians while ‘monotonous’ stays approach Pyrrhonists’ precisely, more or level, this on stays former the that is Cartesians and Pyrrhonists between difference big Cartesian the matches Thus, step. Pyrrhonism first its sense, in only that enterprise skeptical In not. or exist really fire, or honey as such objects, underlying existing, externally if problematic it find not do Pyrrhonists that seems It Also: 16 it. some missed flawsso belief judgment have validity, it, have still in donot about ratherwe its suspend on but we beif sure of to cannot valid its we because instance, complexity us,but appear complexfor can very argument, 20 tradition”. p.290 the skeptical 19 18 17 do.Sextus,thus,writes: Cartesians demon orevil dreaming ones. suchas in posingscenarios, deeper Beside the objects of senses, Pyrrhonians also apply the same pattern when discuss objects of objects samewhen ofPyrrhonians reason –one senses, pattern discuss Beside alsoobjects the apply the expressions uses these in of Williams stratified) transformation (monotonous, ,M.2010.“Descartes Williams 119-20 PH M7365 asleep differently from the way we do when awake; so the existence or non-existence or existence the so awake; when do we way the from differently asleep when and asleep, are we when do we way the from differently things view we awake are we When waking. or sleeping on depending about come appearances Different way the in them mention not do they contents, dreaming discuss do they when Even appearance. ( definition its regards as sweet is it if doubt we But sweetened. perceptually are we since this, allow We sweet. be to us to appears honey instance, For appearance… about said is ( appearances about not doubt we while appear, so does it that grant we appears, it as such is object underlying the whether doubt we When objects. perceptible other the for applies account same the and warming; is fire existing externally the that 20 19 (since they appear differently to different observers or even to the same ones in ones same the to even or observers different to differently appear they (since Namely, Pyrrhonism does investigate and find delusive the real nature of objects nature real andthe find delusive Pyrrhonism Namely, investigate does 18 logos

; ti s nt te apaac, bt smtig si bu the about said something but appearance, the not is this ); 17 phainomenon ) but about what about but )

CEU eTD Collection presented in Cartesianism. Pyrrhonists, even in dreaming, think that they stay cognitively stay they that think is dreaming, in which even confusion, Pyrrhonists, Cartesianism. mental in of presented kind any involve not does actually Dreaming is. person a states two the of which in deducing for problem no is there so significantly, differs it and awake, being from differs dreaming Pyrrhonists, For indiscernible. are contents waking and world istheone. find in, right out a Pyrrhonistwhich to ofthesehas he shouldbelieve which out find to order In ways. different in exist they but exist, do worlds these that is thing the in like Sextus, For here, exist. do not or waking, dreaming – worlds of the one things of that Cartesianism, inferring no is There gained. is it which in situations to relative is things of experience our that show to intended are these of all and healthy, or ill old, or young being as such pairs, other with together go actually waking and Dreaming us. to differently look may things which in situations of example more one add to order in dreaming of writes Sextus 17 22 21 theappearances. right with them offering is worlds the of which out pick to is truth the out find to way their that and lucid, Williams , M. 2010. “Descartes transformation of the skeptical tradition”., p.306 of transformation the ,M.2010.“Descartes skeptical Williams 1104 PH Additionally, as Williams notices Williams as Additionally, life waking of contents the in donotsleep. when thoughexist they even exists as just sleep, in exist they For all. for and once unreal not waking life, in unreal are which things see will we asleep when that then, likely, is It awake. or asleep being to relative – relative but absolute not becomes objects the of 22 , Sextus does not consider the option that dreaming that option the consider not does Sextus , 21

CEU eTD Collection guided and precisely aimed theoretical approach of Descartes, which is a huge historical novelty. huge a is which Descartes, of approach theoretical aimed precisely and guided attentively organized, well of result the is It environment. our about know already we what on reflect and attention our put we when once emerges which something not is skepticism discovery’ a not invention, ‘an it, puts Williams as is, it Rather, thought. philosophical or human for implicit or natural something not is world external the of existence the doubting of idea this that is thing The things. of existence the for respect have they that unexpected quite is it so all, at anything questioning already had they when objects, to so Pyrrhonistsbeof donothesitant more seem ofdreams. because Even contents discussed the of existence very the questioning towards step the worldexternal the 18 24 23 in later this a chapter. bit Iwill more isthe that discuss point This . of full world the in acting of problem a for solution their against go not would in up end to terms, Pyrrhonist in or happiness, concern’ ‘practical a had world, ofHellenistic philosophical the as since skepticism rest they, existential the not develop could Pyrrhonists that claims Burnyeat Pyrrhonism. about discussions in place common a become has which one question, this to answer an gives Burnyeat world. external the of existence the on skepticism their of scope the extend to Cartesians, before ones, first the be to Pyrrhonists Barnyet, M. F. 1982. ” and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkley Missed”. p.30 Berkley Greek M.F.Philosophy: WhatSaw Missed”. and Barnyet, and Descartes 1982.”Idealism tradition”., p.312 of transformation the ,M.2010.“Descartes skeptical Williams If we agree with Williams on this matter, there is still a question of what prevented what of question a still is there matter, this on Williams with agree we If make not did Pyrrhonists that odd seem may it view, of point contemporary our From not explanation Anthe 2.1. questioningoffor Pyrrhonists existence 24 f cus, ti ocr elcs i eoin t gain to devotion in reflects concern this course, Of . 23 of a Cartesianism. Namely, the external world external the Namely, Cartesianism. a of ataraxia . According to Burnyeat, Pyrrhonists Burnyeat, to According .

CEU eTD Collection make it offensive, and lead it toward posing ‘outrageous hypothesis’ of dreaming and evil and dreaming of hypothesis’ ‘outrageous posing toward it lead and offensive, it make concerns theoretical whose Cartesianism, unlike character, its in defensive is Pyrrhonism Inone forthemselves. word, tranquility and ones inwayassure existent that with already deal to skeptics these for enough rather is it but them, new question then some and beliefs raise true to potentially ones the not are They them. by disturbed and bothered be to prevent way that in and untrue, in be might that beliefs because dismiss they themselves that is sure be This to want engage Pyrrhonians someone. by They raised already shaped. questions on been actual, are already that disagreements have that against fight principle. atin worldskepticism, least external sustain not does skepticism their words, that other in or, that, do to able were not they that not and skepticism, their extend to Pyrrhonists of minds the cross not did it why show to serves to only themselves restricted actually explanation this that explicit it make to they want I additionally, But skepticism. essential why explain to order in proposed be to explanation 19 tradition”. p.298 skeptical 25 and in body. Or, Burnyeat’s one ofmind words: the times, modern for characteristic is which division a know not could they but it, to external was what and subject cognitive of division the about knew time Hellenistic of people Namely, of. part are Pyrrhonians that context historical the is concerns, practical their besides world, external demon. Williams’ expressions are: reactive and pre-emptive, in Williams pre-emptive, in of transformation ,M.2010.“Descartes the reactive and are: expressions Williams’ 25 ask what these external things whose nature is in doubt are external to, it appears that appears it to, external are doubt in is nature whose things external these what ask we If things. external of talk Sextus’ in or unclarity parallel a find we For the of existence the about question the raising not for reason important Another against Pyrrhonistsfight Namely, proper a are Pyrrhonists of aims practical that Burnyeat with agree will I now, For no sharp line is drawn such as is presupposed in the modern formulation of the of formulation modern the in presupposed is as such drawn is line sharp no dogma – non-evident beliefs, but what is more, they is more, what but beliefs, – non-evident

CEU eTD Collection rest ofthe worldisnot possible.rest the and mind between gap the why obvious becomes it way, this in not is it if exist not could it and other, each with interconnected as exist universe the of parts all Since world’. natural the of approach account an of part is Hellenistic god of account ‘an the – physics of part a because be to theology considers so the is conceive This cannot Pyrrhonism Cartesianism. that of clear assumptions is theological it creator a as assumed is God if chance. Thus, or nature by or scientist, mad deity, deceiving God, i.e. – someone by created is faculties, cognitive our as well as world, the that means which ‘faculty-skepticism’, of kind a is skepticism Cartesian Namely, Cartesianism. as way same the in framed not is it because is mind and body of division a introduce not does skepticism Pyrrhonian why explanation The 20 26 the for left room no be should there Thus, world. natural the of parts functional’ and ‘organic natural, are faculties and bodies our Pyrrhonism in However, world. the and mind between gap a for space open an is there not, or erroneous be to created are faculties our whether ask in can we since And, not. or fallible be will be faculties our if precisely, more or not, or accordance will faculties our and world the if creation the of process the through decided well isas it then nature orcoincidence, but a as creator, God it operates also, evenisnot that if But skepticism. Cartesian of framework theological the share not do they because mind, and body ,Burnyeat M. F. 1982. ”Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkley Missed”, p.29 Berkley Greek M.F. Philosophy: What SawMissed”, and and ,Burnyeat Descartes 1982.”Idealism Thus, it may be that Pyrrhonists do not recognize the possibility of the division of division the of possibility the recognize not do Pyrrhonists that be may it Thus, own the skeptic’s body. it, everythingelse mind outside including the and between is it which through medium ( perceived the or 102) I (PH it of perception one’s humors affect bodily which the with thing external the contrast can Sextus to?” come that does (cf. man the a i.e., oneself, subject, to cognitive external simply means it Sextus in but mind, the to external means “external” formulation modern the In world. external the of existence the of problem ib. ib. 124-27), so it seems plain that the line is not drawn in Cartesian fashion Cartesian in drawn not is line the that plain seems it so 124-27), adv . . Math . VII 167) – and the question is, “What is, question the and – 167) VII . 26

CEU eTD Collection known as the the as known underwriting externalworld? onthe skepticism scopeoftheir the gaining in problem a have Pyrrhonists would precisely, more Or, is question My essence. their only but things, of existence very the question to challenged not existence. were world’s simply Pyrrhonists external the questioning not for atmosphere good a created concerns toskepticisminclude their external at gapnotall. does appear theofmind-body surprising itthat so,idea isnot be, accordingly, to them suggests Cartesianism that way the in fallible as created are facilities our that option 21 27 the some ofwaysfourfold in in presented appearances with accordance in act they because possible is activity normal their that explain beliefs. without life a live to choose they since activities, any without Vogt , K. M. action”, p.165 Vogt,K. and 2010.“Skepticism necessitation of affections, hunger conducts us to food and thirst to drink. By the By drink. the to thirst By and food thinking. to us and conducts hunger perceiving affections, of of necessitation capable naturally are we guidance nature’s By expertises. in instruction and customs, and laws of down handing the affections, by necessitation consist be inby fourfold, nature, guidance seemand to oflife to ways ordinary These inactive. utterly be to able not are we for – opinions holding without life, of ways ordinary the with accordance in live we appearances, the to attending that, says Burnyeat practical their as well as skeptics, Pyrrhonian of context historical the Obviously, ofwhetheranalysis PyrrhonistsAn could2.2. expand scopeofthe handing down of customs and laws, we regard piety as good and impiety as bad in a in bad as impiety and good as piety regard we laws, and customs of down handing

that they are not touched by Cartesian ideas. Namely, this objection, well objection, this Namely, ideas. Cartesian by touched not are they that apraxia apraxia challenge, accuses Pyrrhonists that they are condemned to live a life a live to condemned are they that Pyrrhonists accuses challenge, in their answer to the famous inactivity objection, inactivity famous the to answer their in : : what would happen if someone was there to ask them about it? about them ask to there was someone if happen would what

scheme. Namely:scheme. ataraxia 27 if they expanded they if But, Pyrrhonists But, Pyrrhonists are Pyrrhonists

CEU eTD Collection Pyrrhonists would in their manner easily withhold the assent on these questions. the withhold assentonthese easily manner wouldinPyrrhonists their world, the and body of existence the believing against and for arguments balanced equally of situations offer to as the way a such in composed already Since are demon evil by deceived Pyrrhonists. being and dreaming for time save even would Descartes world. whole the of existence the and demon evil deceiving of problem the for go would same The cannot. they actually, that answer would they body, a have they that and dreaming not are they that sure be can they how them asked he if and Descartes, with contact in be to them for possible somehow was it if Namely, world. and body of existence the about concerned them make to try would someone if even Pyrrhonists for difference important any make would it that in” act to world a and with act to body “a has he if concerned all at not is who man a of example an as Pyrrhonist a see can we here Burnyeat, to According 22 29 28 worlditself. and the external objects principle ofthe existence judgment onthe their suspend in could they that idea the with line in goes This tranquility. living and gaining Pyrrhonists’ spoil respect any in would world external the of rest the and to these. body, in and includinghisown heaccordance wouldact world things, external the of appearances have still into would he down because fall is this to And not on. so carts, and by precipices, over run dogs, by bitten have be morning, to not the best in his up do breakfast, get still would Pyrrhonist Every circumstances. new these in for proposed answer Burnyeat, M. F. 1982. ”Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkley Missed”, p.30 Berkley Greek M.F.Philosophy: WhatSaw Missed”, and Burnyeat, and Descartes 1982.”Idealism 123 - PH 24 Hence, it does not seem that withholding their assent on the existence of their body their of existence the on assent their withholding that seem not does it Hence, same the not, or exists world the whether and not, or body a have they whether Still, whichadopt. thosewe kindsofexpertise in are we not ininactive expertises instructions kind everyday ofway. Through practical, apraxia challenge serves as the explanation of how Pyrrhonists can act can Pyrrhonists how of explanation the as serves challenge 28 29 . But, it does not seem to me to seem not does it But, .

practical concern of concern practical

CEU eTD Collection As well as: As closely is it that real to the existence: connected says Burnyeat truth, of Pyrrhonian principle. explaining in even when not Namely, skepticism, their of scope the enlarge not could they that implies 23 31 30 question to were they if because principle, in even not skepticism their of not scope the could extend Pyrrhonists that imply to find I what is This world. objective real a to tied not is it if false nor true neither be can belief a that hold Pyrrhonists Burnyeat, to according So, Burnyeat, M. F. 1982. ”Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkley Missed” p.25 Berkley Greek M.F.Philosophy: WhatSaw Missed” and Burnyeat, and Descartes 1982.”Idealism

Burnyeat,M. F. 1998. “Can the skeptic hisBurnyeat,M. live 30 1998.“Can F. the skepticism?“.p. period of Greek philosophy (cf. M ofGreekphilosophy 221). (cf. XI period word the to traditional association an real, the with conforms iswhat a issuch thing, if the there objective true, ofa real world’; ‘true acceptedas be can propositions of or proposition any whether is issue the all at exists truth any whether over dogmatists the and skeptic the between controversy the In reality. in so and thus are things that say which statements only - false or true called not are they - question in not are appear things how record merely which Statements existence. real that doubts to as claims view skeptic in exclusively has he ff.), When 17 VIII M ff., 88 appearances. II (PH true is anything with contrasted as existence real to tied closely is vocabulary, skeptic’s the in truth, that importance central of fact a is it And anything true. as to assent not will skeptic that sense this in is It reality. something’s independent an existence, of true real being to as truth means contexts these in “Truth” a own. in their case the is what about of claim nature a with things comprising and ourselves to external world, objective common truth a make which He statements about. from judgment suspends refrains skeptic the what are these All true. (most is and what like, simply) are things external the what reality, in are things how nature, own their in are things how include: formulation this on Variants themselves. in are things how about claims make which statements to only extends judgment suspending and doubting skeptic’s the about, explicit entirely is Sextus something is this and First, which thought Pyrrhonian of interpretation Burnyeat’s in point one is there But, 30

31

alethes alethes since the earliest the since

CEU eTD Collection different circumstances, etc, but that does not prevent a true Pyrrhonist to keep investigating, keep to Pyrrhonist true a prevent not does that but etc, circumstances, different in observers, different for relative is appearance its since sweet, is really honey that imply not does sweetness honey’s of appearance an having instance, For not. or true actually is that if out find to seeking continue but it, on judgment their suspend they not, or true is something Pyrrhonists contrary, the On of. certain be can they that something find to try to forward about move Cartesians certain these, become never will they that them to seems it Since all. for and once exists this that conclude general, in objects external the or bodies their of existence the e.g. something, about certain be cannot they out find they once Cartesians, that means closed’. ‘theoretically is beliefs of the questioning of terms in which version, them. topossibilityofacquiring abandon the wouldbe inclined they that think to reason any is there that see not do I and it, of offspring hopeful the are beliefs true the since enterprise, Pyrrhonian of point important very is truth the gaining However, false). (or true as belief any identify to able be not would they world external the of existence the 24 33 32 any without wondering, simply is disturbances. truth the ongoing for this seeking their with fact, themselves in troubling But investigation. by tranquility wanted much so their spoiling gain already else, anything whatsoever. be sweet, orabout to for Thus, honey. of is honey of nature real the if certainty reach to nature possibility open an always is there Pyrrhonists real about belief true the reach hopefully point some at and Hankinson, R. Hankinson, J.1995. tradition”. p.290 of transformation the ,M.2010.“Descartes skeptical Williams It may seem strange though, that Pyrrhonists keep inquiring even though they have they though even inquiring keep Pyrrhonists that though, strange seem may It Cartesian the unlike character, its in ‘open-ended’ is skepticism Pyrrhonist Namely,

33 hi he olo of goal chief their Pyrrhonists just allow for the possibility that they may acquire true beliefs, true acquire may they that possibility the for allow just Pyrrhonists The Sceptics ’ strategy is that, once they recognize they cannot be sure whether sure be cannot they recognize they once that, is strategy ., p.270 ataraxia . This is so because it looks as they are actually are they as looks it because so is This . 32 This

CEU eTD Collection once one reaches the accordance with reality. That is why for Pyrrhonists it should not be not should it Pyrrhonists for why is That reality. with accordance the reaches one once be to shown of it. timea conclusion the ofit, unforeseenisnot same itat result it isan though inquiring. of abruption an mean necessarily gaining dogmatists, of commitments share not do Pyrrhonists Since As discomfort. Sextuswrites: iscausing the what is exactly this certainty And gained. be can beliefs thesethat certain are who dogmatist unlike 25 35 34 following:is the quote significant The existence’. real to tied closely is vocabulary, skeptic’s the in ‘truth, that objects’ external of existence the doubting to gets ever Sextus nearest the ‘perhaps as qualifies Hanckinson truth. the a possibilityforgaining close would that since things, external the of existence the question to principle, in even possible, Hankinson, R. Hankinson, J.1995. 127-28 PH At this point, I would like to focus attention on one part of Sextus’ writings, which writings, Sextus’ of part one on attention focus to like would I point, this At be may belief any moment some at that possibility the open leave Pyrrhonists Thus, reasonisuntroubled. this regarding determination no for makes and – vigorously anything pursues nor avoids neither bad, or good naturally things who man the hand, other the On him. seem to which good things, the lose to not order in a everything does fearing he and, fortune, of elation, reversal immoderate and unreasonable his further of into because falling keeps disturbances he them, obtained having than, good, be to imagines he things the pursues he and bad, naturally things by tormented is he that thinks he fine, ( disturbed being forever is bad or good nature by is anything that opines who man the tarassetai

true or false. If Burnyeat is right, this gaining of certain beliefs is obtainable only obtainable is beliefs certain of gaining this right, is Burnyeat If false. or true 35 ); and when he does not have these things which he takes to be naturally be to takes he which things these have not does he when and ); , and then to show that in light of it, Burnyeat is not right when claiming when right not is Burnyeat it, of light in that show to then and , The Sceptics , p.271 34

Epohe, thus, goes along with inquiry, but even but inquiry, with along goes thus, epohe epohe for them does not does them for

CEU eTD Collection purely historical reasons, or precisely, the text written in7366. M written text the orprecisely, historicalfor reasons, purely opinion, my in is, that And matter. this on Pyrrhonism interpreting in right be cannot Burnyeat’s So, it. about belief false or true a with up end to expect cannot we something, of existence very the question we once than objects, external the to related is truth if Namely, time. of point some at acquired be will beliefs true that possible is it which for things of group the once stop to have not it). from exempted be to things only the are non- all which appearances (unlike investigation to liable Pyrrhonists, to according And are, things evident non-evident. are things external that claimed explicitly Sextus Obviously, 26 38 37 36 it. of example such’. ‘as ofobjects existence doubt really the not solitary a actually is do Pyrrhonists because case the it is this that is with, agree I that which explanation, Hanckinson’s and writings, Sextus for common very not is 366 7 M from point that it, emphasizes Hanckinson as is, truth the However, matter. this on Cartesianism with scope in equal be to Pyrrhonism for possibility open an still is there problematic, is claim his that see we when now principle, in even not doubted, be cannot Hankinson, R. Hankinson, J.1995. 113 PH M7366 Since one implication of Burnyeats’s claim is that in Pyrrhonism the external world external the Pyrrhonism in that is claim Burnyeats’s of implication one Since sense. no makes investigation this then interpretation, his in right is Burnyeat if But, reasonunknown us. are forthis to and non-evident are externals all grasped], things the [i.e. them from distinct are which affections our by is of way nonimmediately] by so is grasped is which [i.e. everything since and non-evident, else common something of way by grasped is what then since The Sceptics epohe , p.272 is gained, which means that external objects belong to a to belong objects external that means which gained, is 37 Also, as we have seen, this investigation does investigation this seen, have we as Also, 38 36

CEU eTD Collection to have such a content, statements about the real existence of things do not present any present not exemption. do things of existence real the about statements content, a such have to said be can statement any principal in Since content. theoretical some has that statement any toward directed fact, in is, doubt Their ascribed. are properties particular which to something’ ‘that of existence the doubt actually Pyrrhonists object. external particular some of even or general, in objects the of existence the doubt Pyrrhonists that mean necessarily not does not, skepticism. Pyrrhonismwith implythat existential iscompatible seems to This well. as assent their withhold would they and it about know cannot they that answer to but choice a have not would Pyrrhonists honey, that of existence real the about asked were they if that true is it Also, not. or sweet be to honey of nature the really is it if judgment their 27 39 it. than more matters effective Cartesianism, isonsome its scopethan narrower in is it if Pyrrhonism, even suggest that will I this to In respect is endangering. skepticisms these of each thought human of aspects which explicate this to going in am I least follows, what at In respect. skepticism, Pyrrhonist than wider is Cartesian that means It skepticism. existential than rather essential, truly a as comprehended be to supposed is Pyrrhonism why Hankinson, R. Hankinson, J.1995. 3. The previous chapter is concluded by what seems to be a plausible explanation for explanation plausible a be to seems what by concluded is chapter previous The questions interesting CartesianismPyrrhonism, andepistemologically some or exists ‘really’ something whether on judgment suspending says, Hankinson as But, suspend will they honey, of sweetness the about asked are Pyrrhonists when Namely, 39

The Sceptics . p.272

CEU eTD Collection of the conflicting appearances the same thing is grasped differently. These are classified in classified are These differently. grasped is thing same the appearances conflicting the of light the in that show to supposed are which examples many are There appear. they how only perceptions things. all of relativity for argues it since And later. presented roughly be will them beyond goes also but it, precede which Modes seven of summary a presents it secondly, which Modes, Agrippan of one as repeated is it questions ofvalue.with deal tenth and ninth while character, relative a of is experience perceptual that show them forthese constructed purposes specially acquire to order equal In of strength. be to way a such in arranged are belief some against and for arguments the that of state the firstly reaching, for foundation very the Namely, enterprise. Pyrrhonist whole the for 28 41 40 Pyrrhonist of masterpiece the certainly are they and Agrippa, of Modes Five the in presented are reasoning of results the on assent the withholding to lead to supposed Strategies well. as this to answer to arguing of ways the developed have Pyrrhonists certain. are that beliefs the with him provide to is reasoning if remains question The belief. of sources perceptual on. whichand theyso appear, from places or distances position, appear, they which in mixtures or circumstances it, perceive who ones the to e.g. relatively appear objects that illustrate to order in Modes seven first the Pyrrhonian 2010.“The p.214 Woodruf,P. Modes”. And opinions,purposes to it when ofModes.And comes the Agrippan epohe Thanks to ‘Ten Modes’, one realizes that he is not supposed to be confident about the about confident be to supposed not is he that realizes one Modes’, ‘Ten to Thanks of seven first The . of Modes Ten as known is ways these of set One of concept the of role the is big how explicate to important is it all, of First and than than and 41 are relative to something, one is not to deliberate the real nature of things but things of nature real the deliberate to not is one something, to relative are ataraxia 40

The eighth of them, Relativity Mode, is special in Firstly, twoways. isspecial Mode, Relativity ofthem, eighth The , lies in in lies , isostheneia isosthenia . , Pyrrhonists use their modes or ways of arguing, of ways or modes their use Pyrrhonists , , which, as has been said, presents realization presents said, been has as which, , n sot hs Md niae ht sne all since that indicates Mode this short, In isosthenia

CEU eTD Collection question. Due to their basic principles, Pyrrhonists would not claim that it is impossible to impossible is it that claim not would Pyrrhonists principles, basic their to Due question. in debate the of status current the on report a as understood be to is another over position one choose to inability The question. disputed the regarding positions the between choice definite a make to impossible it finds one one), philosophical a or life everyday (from debate side. either of favor in arguing of way satisfying no is there as indeterminable, fact in is disagreement the that show which Circularity, and Hypothesis regress, Infinite – modes formal the for material provide they way, This is). topic the (whatever reached have we disagreement the resolve to required are we that fact the to attention call to is role their and Relativity, and Dispute from Modes. formal and material groups: two in divided be could forbelieving. basis adequate strategy’ skeptical ‘all-embracing an provide combined five skepticism. 29 should hisone onit. suspend judgment sincedispute together this follows that, initial isthatand dispute itselfunsolved, it, it is with solved and the not of used, the criteriawe disputeabout the endadequateness upreaching levelwe a onthat too but meta-level, move of turnsout to someto one the resolve dispute disputeitself.Therefore,it orderto needs in a subject that to to criteriaturns a and out solve is thus the dispute.Butfind such be evident, everyeffort the that problem makeclear and ato dispute it aproof matter who need criteriaor Sextus saysof unclear sowe any is that from is, to hisinThe have response comes why onthe suspend matter That question? wouldone judgment needofis disputeasthat that matterwhythink possible subjectdispute, something wouldone to is to unsolved? every that possibility,onrationality. butwe onmere evenbased accept theremains, question rather Still, if positive Mode makesuch not it that to is thedisputes.Therefore,this but unjustified any context claimsin is of 45 andJustificationKnowledge 44 43 42 matterunresolved. iscurrently the as judgment the suspend to is one are, they as being things that, just but all, at dispute the solve calls these Fogelin R. Hankinson, J.1995. with J.1990. accordance Barnes, presented in Here This Agrippan mode should be interpreted not as to claim that it is be modeasit one should claimthat interpretednot the Agrippan to impossiblesidedispute, in This take to The one of material Modes, Mode from Dispute, says that no matter the subject of a of subject the matter no that says Dispute, from Mode Modes, material of one The Modes Agrippan the milieu, skeptical the in them employs one way the on Depending 42 Each of these Modes leads one to suspend judgment on matters in question. All question. in matters on judgment suspend to one leads Modes these of Each challenging The Sceptics ., p.116 and dialectical dialectical ., p.163 45

Modes, in R.Modes, Fogelin, 1994. The ToilsScepticism of 44 Material Modes are the modes the are Modes Material 43 . Phyronian Reflections on Phyronian Reflections evn o ro o the for room no leaving ,

CEU eTD Collection ns eivn ht raos rltd i hs mne a fe n aeut justification adequate an offer one why is this And foundation. its can lacking building a be could there that believing resembles manner this in related reasons that Believing ones. other on based being elusive, are points the all sequence infinite an in but point, firm a on on, so and reasons, those of favor in reasons give must he then but it, of favor in reasons adequate present to is byreasoning. be resolved can dispute whether show to task the have modes three These Modes. remaining three the of role serves relativity from one the with together Dispute, sets others. onethe which offall isthe Relativity from mode the dispute, of existence the on based are Modes three other Since relativity. of a is dispute the whereas dispute, for cause the presents It dispute. a for needed facts the establishing of function a has it Here Modes. Aenesidemus’s of eighth the as above described 30 (un)justified. other i.e. equally on each based eventually all are they as other, any than priority higher of is reason no that is problem The one. starting 46 from Mode the for job a is situation This reasons. further by supported not is that reason judgment onboth. shouldsuspend person the point, starting the as reasons the of one assume to unable being case, a such in Namely, intervenes. Circularity from Mode the when is This concerned. positions the from derived are that reasons the offering up end self-evident, as them of one establishing or position, certain a in forhisbelief it. justification find a cannot

The lack of starting point is not to be taken literally, since every point of the circle can be thought of as the as of thought be can circle the of point every since literally, taken be to not is point starting of lack The Also, in order to avoid giving reasons for the ones already given, one may give a give may one given, already ones the for reasons giving avoid to order in Also, of favor in reasons of number infinite an giving of instead could, person a why is That he something, assert to is one if that indicates regress Infinite from Mode the Firstly, So, stage. the on get Modes other three explicated, is dispute the Once already is which Relativity, from one the is modes Material of remaining The ad infinitum ad . That something is based on reasons means that it is founded is it that means reasons on based is something That . 46

as the background for understanding the understanding for background the as the Mode from Mode the

CEU eTD Collection some certain criteria for ratifying this equality. Rather, these proposed arguments are, strictly are, arguments proposed these Rather, equality. this ratifying for criteria certain some is there that mean not does that it, on judgment their suspend will they so balanced equally all that comes it how words, other ofequal strength. are one belief forand against options proposed in Or, one. better a as options the cannot of really one he recognize that possible is it how Modes, Aenesiedmus of any of outcomes the or Hypothesis, from Mode the with confronted when ask, still might one course, Of acceptance. isostheneia orreasoning. evidence no upon based be would choice his other, the of instead options the of one choose to was he If (un)justified. equally are they so them, of either support to offered are reasons No opinion. opposite exactly the assume to justified less any be would he why see to hard is it opinion, an for reasons any offer not does one If Dogmatism. to us lead would it accepting reason, a says Agrippa Namely, Hypothesis. 31 49 48 ofis existence theAgrippa Diogenvery thus certain.is not Laertius, 47 of terms,choice illness the tough is.InPyrrhonian how the medicine onthat isdependent of a of procedure medicine. proper a prescribing doctor’s then and diagnosis a the making illness, detecting resembles approach Pyrrhonist the Namely, Pyrrhonism. of of suspending judgment.for motivation’ ‘psychological a as serve to intended is balanced equally as arguments recognizing Thus, not. or balanced equally are arguments opposed offered if that of persuasiveness in lies judgment suspending for reason only The weightless. speaking, PH 3280-1 PH R. Hankinson, J.1995. that Modes put onlyAgrippa isto who to adequately saysinceascribes these Sextus this, the one more Here The expected persuasiveness of of persuasiveness expected The are belief some for given arguments that say Pyrrhonists when that, is thing The in based run long the in are Modes, Aenesidemus and Agrippan both how is this And 48 , since all conflicting reasons for a belief are supposed to be equally worthy of worthy equally be to supposed are belief a for reasons conflicting all since ,

The Sceptics ., p.260 47 that because there is no evidence in favor of that kind of kind that of favor in evidence no is there because that isostheneia goes in line with the therapeutic character therapeutic the with line in goes 49 The strength The

CEU eTD Collection After all, Pyrrhonist procedures are not something they recommend to others. In the first the In others. to recommend they something not are procedures Pyrrhonist all, After toPyrrhonists.As something trouble job.Sextus says: notIt dothe isnot will arguments strength. ‘actual’ their purposes, forthe regardless serve well in up end to person particular a lead to enough effective are they If persuaded. easily is person the if used be may arguments lousy very some even different belief, that means It judgment. suspend to them same persuade to order in proposed be the to have arguments have who individuals different for that be may it Sometimes As Sextussays: which way best suitssomeone. modifyin a arguments isto Pyrrhonist skeptic accomplish to intended arguments the 32 52 tradition”, p.294) 51 50 severe with tranquility. than him rather anxiety provides actually which something as belief’ than rather bafflement of state ‘the find would someone that imagine to hard not is it says, Burnyeat As all. at desirable intentions. their for the succeed Pyrrhonism in but to not isfine, necessary that methods, their of behalf on happiness reaches else someone If themselves. for it accomplish to satisfied be would they and life, good a gaining in interested auto- are Pyrrhonists actually therapeutic. is Pyrrhonism that said be may it so themselves, for these used they place Burnyeat,M. F.theskepticism?“, skeptic his live Burnyeat,M. p.55 1998.“Can of transformation isWilliams’ the 1.4 (this ,M.2010.“Descartes skeptical PH Williams translation in M7443 Also, it may be that someone does not find the Pyrrhonist concept of happiness as happiness of concept Pyrrhonist the find not does someone that be may it Also, one. on each chronicler a like report we moment, the at impression as our to according rather, just say; we are they that maintain strongly we do recount will we that things the of none to respect with that advance in stating way] Skeptic the [of account outline an give to of choice any persons some for that possibility the exclude not does this course, Of of worthy deemed things surrounding trust the with acceptance. strength equal into them of each bring to and trustworthy, be to not seem that things the for case the make to but – basis sufficient a as preconception common the with content be to case, their in but, trusted, are that things for case the making from refrain to is procedure skeptic’s The 50 51 52 Or, it can be that the Pyrrhonist life may look to someone as someone to look may life Pyrrhonist the that be can it Or, isostheneia isostheneia is relative to individuals. And the job of a of job the And individuals. to relative is epohe , it means that these arguments these that means it ,

CEU eTD Collection disturbances which are connected with having a belief. with connected having which are disturbances of period the during or moment, very the with compatible is which inquiry continual the during acquired be cannot belief that sense the in Not question. in matter the believing for all at left space no is there states these reaching after importance, big a of is what And, First back. way no is there appreciated, and recognized when once But, goal. preferable to a lead they if or even persuasiveness strength, to spoil it.not are others of beliefs and goal, their gained have Pyrrhonists tranquility, with them provides method their as long as be, may others on effect the whatever Again, risking. in find can gaining in satisfaction a find not risks. of sorts any without be to designed beliefs. on dependent are emotions says, of sense the in not time this and unbearable, 33 54 53 not deceived. Iam worldimplies that of the existence the since me, deceiving not is demon evil that knowing my with goes which world, external the of existence the of knowledge my to applies point same The dreaming. not am I that know I then dreaming, not am I that implies body my of existence the because and body, entail to that like knows someone if that says which knowledge, the for principle Closure Deductive the on relies actually skepticism the Cartesian closed. exploit deductively arguments as knowledge These of knowledge. character human of basis the endanger to intended are Hankinson, R. Hankinson, J.1995. M.F.theskepticism?“, skeptic his live Burnyeat, p.45 1998.“Can This is not how the things go in Cartesian skepticism. Namely, Cartesian arguments Cartesian Namely, skepticism. Cartesian in go things the how not is This adequate the of are arguments Pyrrhonist the whether discussed be may it Obviously, q, q, than that person knows knows person that than The Sceptics ., p.275 ataraxia 54 , if that is preventing him to enjoy all the passion he passion the all enjoy to him preventing is that if , ataraxia And we can easily imagine a gambler who would who gambler a imagine easily can we And 53 In line with this, Pyrrhonist life is, in a way, a in is, life Pyrrhonist this, with line In q q

anxiety but rather boredom. Namely, as as Namely, boredom. rather but anxiety ataraxia as well. This means that if I know that I have a have I that know I if that means This well. as ’s presence, there is no belief as well as no as well as belief no is there presence, ’s , as I discussed it before. But rather, at rather, But before. it discussed I as , epohe, and after it it after and ataraxia ataraxia isosteneia p, p, follows. and and p p is is

CEU eTD Collection incidentally lives in a town near to the the to near town a in lives incidentally questions. philosophical and scientific many approach would skeptic Pyrrhonian and Cartesian which which upon and questioned is which thing the believing seen, of option have that with we one leave As not does them. Pyrrhonism believing from him prevent not does it but things, these know not does he that admit to have would He exists. world external the that or body a has he that worldexists. the doesa has bodyorthat external knowhe he not that then mind, his with playing is demon evil the or dreaming is he whether know not does one If not. or demon evil by deceived being is he whether know cannot one reason, same the for as, well as indiscernible, are states waking and dreaming since not, or know awake is cannot he whether One not. or realized actually are they whether sure for say to impossible it 34 of some consider to Teodora lead would they that and be may it aliens, of presence actual for against reasons the listing in enough persistent be would psychiatrist if contrary, the On safety. own her for worrying stop herself let not would she did, she that possibility a still is there since but not, or UFO saw she if know not does she that admit to have would She case. the is this that sure be not could still Teodora UFO, an saw she that thinks that of and because demon evil an by deceived being or dreaming was she that be might it that realizing After programs. skeptical the with confronted are patients which strange in a treatment of alternative promoter a chance by is psychiatrist Teodora’s abduction. alien of victim a of possibility the by obsessed got has she story, Walton’s Travis the heard has she For instance, we can imagine Teodora who is in love with ‘The X-files’ series and series X-files’ ‘The with love in is who Teodora imagine can we instance, For believe still may one scenarios, Cartesians with presented when even Interestingly, makes which way the in constructed are scenarios demon evil and dreaming both But, isostheneia is agreed. These differences are recognizable in the ways in ways the in recognizable are differences These agreed. is Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest National Apache-Sitgreaves in Arizona. Since Arizona. in

CEU eTD Collection gods – they can, together with all the others, enjoy the Dionysius feasts, immolate oxes to oxes immolate feasts, Dionysius the enjoy others, the all with together can, they – gods Olympic worshiping when contemporaries their of others as act to able thus are Pyrrhonists ‘ under falls pieties the respecting scheme, fourfold destiny about anyofhissoulwhatsoever. belief without shaman leave would it since devastation, from trees only Shutka’s Again, save possibly skepticism. would approach with Pyrrhonist shaman present could he philosophy, in champion some was there Shutka in If village. his in tree every on leaves cuts dedicatedly shaman this again, Shutka in born be to soul his prevent to order In crowns. trees in twisted get death after souls our that also who spirits, evil of exorcism in champion the himself wife, looking best tapes, music Turkish best clothes, best the possessing in champions are who citizens fellow other his like is, He Macedonia. FYR Shutka, – Balkan on community Roma biggest that terrified. shecould her, so stopbeing threatening aliens believe to her for place no leave would it happens, that If balanced. equally as these 35 a is doubt Cartesian Again, paper. this of beginning the in discussed are that skepticisms about it. a certainknowledge have cannot he although existence, God’s in believe can still he demon evil an by deceived is person a though even that is truth the not, or intuitions Descartes’ sharing However, ideas. distinct and clear forother the as serves criteria in that fact which isthe ofGod, ideas, idea among distinct and clear indubitable, determining for space a open actually arguments Cartesian know, we doubt as Descartes, to were it If existence. God’s about belief a having with compatible be to Cartesian seems contrary, the On not. or exists actually gods these whether on judgment of suspension their is citizens fellow their from Pyrrhonists distinguishes what But etc. , mentioned the in Namely, . towards attitude Pyrrhonists the is this with line In the from shaman as such death, after life the in interested someone for goes same The The reason for illustrated differences lies in the different concerns of the two the of concerns different the in lies differences illustrated for reason The the handing down of laws and customs’. and laws of down handing the

CEU eTD Collection of beliefs, Cartesianism stays on the knowledge level. level. stays knowledge Cartesianism onthe of beliefs, with While knowledge. only of concept the problematizing content stays which Cartesianism unlike belief, of possibility very it the since attacks sense, epistemological relevant the in Cartesianism than stronger is Pyrrhonism that is approaches skeptical two these of motivations different of consequences the of one However, soul. or God of existence the as such questions epistemological important about or matter), that for strumphs (or aliens of existence the about either beliefs have to not is one standards, Pyrrhonist to accordance in living of worth life acquire to order In ones. practical vivid, with but Cartesianism, as concerns theoretical pure with troubled not is Pyrrhonism because is This allow. not does Pyrrhonism seen, have we as which, matters, suspicious some about beliefs having of possibility all the of exclude not it does clear This parts. to unreliable important suspicious, is it knowledge certain get to order In one. methodological 36

Pyrrhonian skepticism operates on the level the on operates skepticism Pyrrhonian

CEU eTD Collection lived, as well as the defensive character of their skepticism, prevented Pyrrhonists from Pyrrhonists do. data Cartesians as conclusionssame thefrom the same drawing prevented skepticism, their of character defensive the as well as lived, in which they circumstances concerns and historical practical world.On contrary, the external whole the as well as objects particular of existence the then and perception, our of reliability the firstly suspecting, towards it pushed skepticism Cartesian of orientation theoretical The theories. opinions and accepted already the of plausibility the testing for weapon powerful very a as least at serve still can Modes, its with armed skepticism, Pyrrhonian effective then life, an happy as the not gaining for If method reason. therapeutic good a without centuries the of dust the from out dig not Conclusion 37 55 original’. version ofthe ancient and philosophy impoverished ‘a as pale modern of editors of remark a with line in goes well very what is this And in. believed be cannot even they more, is what but known, be cannot scope its of members are that things the that just not is it that since enterprise, remarkable one as respected be to is Pyrrhonism Cartesianism, of case the of interpretation Burnyaet’s the goinwith itline Sextus’writings. thought, from not does since Pyrrhonian drawn be can which implication the as accepted Burnyeat, M and Frede, M(eds.). Mand Frede, Burnyeat, Even though it does not expand its scope to the level which makes it universal, as in as universal, it makes which level the to scope its expand not does it though Even be to not is that But essential. purely as Pyrrhonism accept should we why is This goals. intended their in differ Pyrrhonism and Cartesianism much how seen have We was it and that particular strength Pyrrhonian seemsthat a end,has it skepticism In the The Original Skeptics, Skeptics, Original The The Original AControversy Skeptics: who characterize the skepticism which is discussed in the in discussed is which skepticism the characterize who , p.ix 55

CEU eTD Collection References 38 Harvard University Press.Harvard University E.1978. M. Curley, pp. 25-57. Company, Publishing Inc. Hackett Controversy A Skeptics: skeptic 1998.“Can F. his skepticism?“.In: Burnyeat,M. the live Press.University Missed”. Berkley Philosophy:and Descartes Saw What 1982.”IdealismandBarnyeat, F. Greek M. pp.92-126. Company, Publishing Inc. Hackett Controversy A Skeptics: In: His 1998.“Theand F. Time”. Burnyeat,M. in Place Skeptic Company, Publishing Inc. Hackett Indianapolis/Cambridge: 1998. and(eds.). Burnyeat, Frede, M 1990. Barnes, J. Inc. pp.58-91 Company, Publishing Hackett Indianapolis/Cambridge: and(eds.). Burnyeat, Frede, M. : ofa pyrrhonist”. belief 1998.“The Barnes, J. Scepticism. (ed. and Barnes,J. trans.). J. 2000.SextusEmpiricus. Annas, University Press.University R.1996 Decartes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2ndedition. University Cambridge Cambridge: The Toils of ScepticismThe Toils of The Philosophical Review, Meditations Descartes AgainstSkepticsDescartes the . Burnyeat, M.Frede, M.. Burnyeat, and Indianapolis/Cambridge: (eds.). M.Frede, M.. Burnyeat, and Indianapolis/Cambridge: (eds.).

on First Philosophy on First . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. Cambridge: University Cambridge The Original Skeptics: A Controversy A The Original Skeptics: Vol.91,No.1. pp.3-40.Duke The Original Skeptics: A Controversy Skeptics: The Original . Cambridge: Cambridge . Cambridge, Massachusetts: . Cambridge, The Original The Original The Original The Original Outlines of Outlines of . . CEU eTD Collection 39 232 Skepticism Ancient ,P. Pyrrhonian In: 2010.“The Woodruf Modes”. 181 Skepticism Ancient In: 2010.“Skepticism and M. action”. Vogt ,K. Press.University pp.288-314 Ancient Skepticism Companionto Cambridge In: tradition”. ofthe skeptical 2010.“Descartes transformation ,M. Williams Routledge B.2005. Williams, 1995. R.J. Hankinson, Press University Oxford R.1994. Fogelin, of Haldane, R.2008. Decartes, Descartes

E. S . . and Cambridge Phyronian Reflections on Knowledge andJustification onKnowledge Phyronian Reflections

. Bett, R. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.208- University Press. R.(ed.). Cambridge:. Bett, Cambridge pp.165- University Press. R.(ed.). Cambridge:. Bett, Cambridge Ross G.Ross R.T. Meditations Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. of TheProject Descartes: The Sceptics : Cambridge

on First Philosophy on First

(trans). 1931. Rene Descartes. (trans). 1931.Rene . London: Routledge. University Press, 2 University volume . Bett, R. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge R.(ed.). Cambridge: . Bett, The Cambridge Companion to Companionto The Cambridge The CambridgeCompanion to . Oxford:Oxford Press. University London and Newyork: London Philosophical Works . Oxford: The

Top View