The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II. -
Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 16, Number 26, June 23
�TIillSpecial Reports THE SCIENCE THE WESTERN OF STATECR AFT OLIGA RCHY Strategic Studies by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. The Trilateral Conspiracy Against the U.S. Constitution: Fact or Fiction? Foreword by Lyndon LaRouche. Order Operation Juarez. LaRouche's famous analysis of the Ibero #85019. $100. American "debt bomb"-a program for continental integra tion. Order #82010*. $100. Moscow's Secret Weapon: Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mafia April 1986. Order #86001. $250. A Conceptual Outline of Modern Economic Science. Or der #82016. $50. The Libertarian Conspiracy to Destroy America's Schools. Order #86004. $250. Religion, Science, and Statecraft: New Directions in Indo-European Philology. Order #83001. $100. White Paper on the Panama Crisis: Who's Out to De stabilize the u.s. Ally, and Why. Order #88002. $100. Saudi Arabia in the Year 2023. The thematic task of the Arab world in the next four decades: conquering the desert. A Classical KGB Disinformation Campaign: Who Killed Order #83008. $100. Olof Palme? Issued November 1986. Order #86010. $100. The Implications of Beam-Weapon Technology for the The Panama Crisis, 18 Months Later. Order #88002 $100. Military Doctrine of Argentina. Order #83015. Was $250. The Kalmanowitch Report: Soviet Moles in the Reagan Reduced price: $100. Bush Administration. Order #88001. $150. The Design of a Leibnizian Academy for Morocco. Order #83016. Was $250. Reduced price: $100. Mathematical Physics From the Starting Point of Both Ancient and Modern Economic Science. Order #83017. THE SOVIET UNION Was $250. Reduced price: $100. The Development of the Indian and Pacific Ocean Bas Will Moscow Become the Third Rome? How the KGB ins. -
Davies. Troilus and Siege
! ‘Wereyed on every side:’ Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde and the Logic of Siege Warfare* D"#$%& D"'$%( Geo)rey Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde is a narrative of war that disavows any interest in recounting the events of war. Set towards the end of the Trojan War, Chaucer’s tale turns its back on valorous deeds and bloody battles in favour of the love a)air between a Trojan prince and a beautiful widow, Troilus and Criseyde. *is attitude is epitomized by a line from the opening of the poem that Chaucer closely translated from Giovanni Boccaccio’s Il Filostrato: ‘*e thynges fellen, as they don of werre’ (+.+!,).+ *ings happened, as they do in war: armies attacked the city, the city fought back; pitched battles occurred, soldiers died; the war of attrition continued. *e events of the Trojan War are ‘wel wist’ (+.-.), and it is not Chaucer’s task or his intention to recapitulate what we already know about the war. *is idea is repeated at the end of the poem, where Chaucer states that if he had intended to write ‘*e armes of this ilke worthi man, / *an wolde ich of his batailles endite; / But for that I to writen /rst bigan / Of his love, I have seyd as I kan’ (-.+.0-–+.01). If Chaucer had meant to write about Troilus’ military endeavours, then * For their criticism, commentary and support, I would like to thank Kellie Robertson and the two anonymous readers of New Medieval Literatures, Aaron Bartels-Swindells, Arthur Bahr, Rita Copeland, Helen Cushman, Jonathan Morton, Paul Saint-Amour, Emily Steiner, Spencer Strub and David Wallace, and audiences at the Sewanee Medieval Colloquium, Delaware Medieval Association and La Poésie dans les temps de guerre for comments and suggestions. -
Peace, but Not at Any Price: the Effects of Rapid Military Demobilization on US
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Sean Jones for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in History, History of Science, and Philosophy presented on November 28, 2016. Title: “Peace, But Not at Any Price: The Effects of Rapid Military Demobilization on US Foreign Policy and the Progression of the Nuclear Arms Race 1945-1953”. Abstract approved: Christopher M. Nichols The research conducted here originated with the question of what caused the massive build-up of nuclear arsenals, which included ever larger and more powerful bombs and delivery systems from them, in the United States and the Soviet Union, even though the consensus beforehand was that nuclear energy should be prohibited from being used for military purposes. The results found show a parallel progression between the ever increasing sense of paranoia in United States foreign policy towards their former ally, the Soviet Union, which led the Truman administration to expend more resources into developing more advanced nuclear weapons. This eventually made nuclear deterrence the forefront of the American strategy. Several historians, including Michael D. Gordon and Morton A. Kaplan, trace the behavior of the Truman administration to a growing concern that United States military forces would be inadequate in countering a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. The origin of this was the Truman administration’s decision to demobilize American forces at a rapid pace from May of 1945 to the spring of 1946. The administration had originally put their hopes in the newly chartered United Nations to settle all international disputes and a campaign for volunteers to replace the veterans being discharged. -
Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Hegemony Over the Heavens: The Chinese and American Struggle in Space by John Hodgson Modinger A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CENTRE FOR MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2008 © John Hodgson Modinger 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44361-3 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44361-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. -
Declaring Victory and Admitting Defeat
Declaring Victory and Admitting Defeat Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy In the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Thomas Michael Dolan Jr. Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Richard K. Herrmann, Advisor Daniel Verdier Theodore Hopf Copyright by Thomas Michael Dolan Jr. 2009 Abstract When do wartime events cause state leaders to change their political or military approach to a war, or try to end it? This study answers this question by focusing on leaders’ beliefs about how war advances their political aims and the changes those beliefs undergo, and the role of emotions in motivating or suppressing those changes. These key beliefs are conceptualized as Theories of Victory, and three key types of theory of victory—oriented toward demonstrating capability, wearying their opponent, or directly acquiring the aims—are identified. These types are used to explain how leaders interpret wartime events and, if they conclude their approach has failed, what further options (if any) will seem plausible. The motivation to learn associated with anxiety (produced by novel bad news) and the suppression of learning associated with anger and contentedness (produced by familiar bad news and good news) are used to explain when particular series of events lead to these key changes. Three cases are used to test the theory—the Winter War (Finland-USSR 1939-1940), the Pacific War (US-Japan 1941-1945) and the Battle of France (France-Germany 1940). ii Dedication For my Parents iii Acknowledgements It has been a long journey. -
Regime Change Or Disarming WMD?
Jones 2/21/06 8:11 PM Page 62 62 Regime change or Legally, regime change and disarmament of Iraqi WMD via the United Nations were two disarming WMD? separate and different bases for war. We Blair’s know that it would not have been possible to get a legal agreement for war on the basis of contradictions regime change and this was made clear to Tony Blair in a letter from Jack Straw dated 25 March 2002. Tony Blair was told this again in July 2002 in the ‘Downing Street Lynne Jones Memo’. This records that the Attorney- General told the Prime Minister that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. Yet, in his evidence to your inquiry, Tony Blair tries to ‘merge’ the two distinct rationales for going to war: ‘I think there is a danger that we end up with a very sort of binary distinction between regime change here and WMD here.’ He continued with this point as he was questioned further: ‘It is more a different way of expressing the same proposition. The Americans in a sense were saying, “We are for regime change Lynne Jones was, until because we don’t trust he is ever going to April 2010, the give up his WMD ambitions”. We were distinguished Member of saying, “We have to deal with his WMD Parliament for ambitions. If that means regime change, so be it”.’ Birmingham Selly Oak. This excerpt is from her I urge the Inquiry panel to consider this detailed submission to the very closely. -
Libya? Bruce W. Jentleson and Christopher A
Who “Won” Libya? Who “Won” Libya? Bruce W. Jentleson and Christopher A. The Force-Diplomacy Debate and Its Whytock Implications for Theory and Policy Having promoted glo- bal radicalism and regional rejectionism, engaged in terrorism, and pursued weapons of mass destruction (WMD) for years, Libya has shifted away from its “rogue state” policies, most especially by settling the Pan Am 103 Lockerbie terrorism case and by abandoning its programs for the development of nu- clear, chemical, and biological weapons.1 The key policy changes started in 1999, when Libya surrendered two Lockerbie suspects for trial in The Hague, and culminated in 2003 with the settlement of the Lockerbie case that August and particularly Libya’s December 19 announcement that it had agreed to abandon its WMD programs and allow international inspections. The debate over who deserves credit for these important changes in Libyan policy is a lively one politically and a challenging one analytically.2 Among the questions that analysts have sought to answer are: To what extent was Libyan leader Muammar Qaddaª intimidated by the George W. Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq and the broader Bush doctrine of preemptive force? How important was diplomacy, especially the secret talks between Libya and the United States that started late in Bill Clinton’s administration and contin- ued into the Bush administration, with the British playing a signiªcant role? What other factors, including Libya’s internal politics and economy, came into play? And what are the lessons for dealing with other terrorism-supporting, WMD-seeking, and otherwise aggressive states? Positions in this debate have been sharply staked out. -
The Negotiation of Resolution 1441
SECTION 3.5 DEVELOPMENT OF UK STRATEGY AND OPTIONS, SEPTEMBER TO NOVEMBER 2002 – THE NEGOTIATION OF RESOLUTION 1441 Contents Introduction and key findings ....................................................................................... 199 US/UK discussion of a draft resolution ........................................................................ 200 Iraq’s agreement to the return of inspectors .......................................................... 209 Discussion of US draft of 20 September 2002 ....................................................... 215 Agreement to offer UK military forces to the US for planning purposes ................ 218 Publication of the Iraq dossier ...................................................................................... 221 Cabinet, 23 September 2002 ................................................................................. 221 Parliamentary debates, 24 September 2002 ......................................................... 228 Mr Blair’s statement, 24 September 2002 ....................................................... 228 Adjournment debate in the House of Commons, 24 September 2002 ............ 236 Debate in the House of Lords, 24 September 2002 ........................................ 240 Mr Straw’s evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee, 25 September 2002 ......................................................................................... 241 Discussions between the US, the UK, France and Russia .......................................... 242 US/UK draft resolution, -
Section 4.2 Iraq Wmd Assessments, July To
SECTION 4.2 IRAQ WMD ASSESSMENTS, JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2002 Contents Introduction and key findings ....................................................................................... 115 Late July and August 2002 ........................................................................................... 116 Mr Blair’s meeting, 23 July 2002 ............................................................................ 116 “Summer reading” .................................................................................................. 121 Reservations about the wisdom of publishing the dossier ..................................... 124 Revision of the WMD paper ................................................................................... 129 JIC Assessment, 21 August 2002: ‘Iraq: Saddam’s Diplomatic and Military Options’ .................................................................................................................. 132 Mr Blair’s position at the end of August 2002 ........................................................ 134 September 2002 .......................................................................................................... 136 Mr Blair’s decision to publish the dossier ............................................................... 136 The FCO position on the problem posed by Iraq ................................................... 145 Mr Campbell’s meeting, 5 September 2002 .......................................................... 149 Mr Blair’s meeting with President Bush, Camp David, 7 September -
Perfidious Albion Game Index
Perfidious Albion Game Index Currently incorporates issues 21-24, 61-104 Rev Review Srev short review (1 paragraph-1page, may not have separate title) Sr short remarks (1 sentence-1paragraph) Pla Play analysis, replay Disc Discussion Hr House rules, fixes (not in 62,70) Var Variant Scen Scenario Udd upcoming design discussion Err errata Fyno For your nostrils only Mbr Magazine & Book Review section Mbp My Back Pages section Wtps What the players say, from #83 Clio Clio nomination, #86, #87. +..nominated for best, -…nominated for worst historical game (left out for now) Obsb Open the box, stake the bunny! Only games with comments on gameplay are indexed, no announcements of publication or arrival or component listings. However, design discussion and remarks indicative of some sort of evaluation will be included. No guarantees for accuracy or completeness. Note that in particular Sr and Srev entries may not have a separate title and you may have to look for them in the magazine. 1st Cavalry 1964 (Vae Victis) 102 (srev/obsb) 5th Fleet 74 (rev), 75 (sr/fyno) 7 Ages 63 (udd/fyno) 7th Fleet 66 (rev) 8th Army (Attactix) 103 (rev) 13: The Colonies in Revolt 61 (rev), 63 (disc/fyno) The ’45 92 (rev) 1630something 91 (srev/wtps) 1812 (Columbia) 93 (sr) 1807: The Eagle Goes East 90 (fyno), 93 (srev,pla) 1815 79 (rev) 1862 76 (rev) 79 (sr/fyno) 1904/05 102 (rev) 1914: Glory’s End 88 (srev), 90 (srev) 1914: Opening Moves 104 (srev/obsb) 1918: Storm in the West 81/82 (rev), 83 (srev), 84 (sr) Across Five Aprils 84 (wtps,srev), 85 (rev/hr), 86 (sr, -
Washington's Identity Crisis
Washington’s Identity Crisis The Art and Craft of Strategy by Robert E. Hunter A new journal of international affairs for a new century—this is timely, useful, and appropriate. It comes a decade after the end of the cold war, which for its part re- placed a global system that for two generations had governed a large part of relations among the world’s major countries. To be sure, the cold war was an aberration— nothing like it was seen before—but by its end it had sunk deeply into the conscious- ness of political leaders, analysts, and other commentators, so much so that few if any of these figures predicted its end, even though, in retrospect, that end has taken on the color of inevitability. The years between the late 1940s and late 1980s provided a degree of certainty in international politics. The classic fluidity of relations among states gave way to a rigidity, at least in the basic outlines of the international political and economic sys- tem. The cold war was not without open conflict. Not everything that happened in international politics was subsumed within the overall framework, nor did the central competition between East and West extend to every corner of the world. But the cold war framework did take precedence as the organizing principle for international rela- tions. With those predictable guideposts and confines now gone, the success of U.S. foreign policy will depend in large part on a renaissance in strategic thinking. The nature of cold war conflict led to a narrowing of strategic focus that now must be reexpanded for the United States to have a clear and inclusive picture of the chal- lenges and opportunities presented by today’s world.