DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit in North America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit in North America Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition PART 2 TRANSIT IN NORTH AMERICA CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 2-1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Role of Transit .................................................................................................................. 2-1 Dominance of Large Systems......................................................................................... 2-2 Statistics ............................................................................................................................ 2-3 CHAPTER 2. BUS TRANSIT ........................................................................................... 2-5 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 2-5 Service Types.................................................................................................................... 2-5 Fixed-Route .................................................................................................................. 2-5 Demand-Responsive ................................................................................................... 2-5 Deviated Fixed-Route ................................................................................................. 2-7 Rural and Intercity....................................................................................................... 2-7 Other Modes................................................................................................................. 2-7 Operating Environments ................................................................................................ 2-7 Segregated Right-of-Way ........................................................................................... 2-8 High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes.................................................................... 2-9 Arterial Street Bus Lanes ............................................................................................ 2-9 Mixed Traffic.............................................................................................................. 2-10 Vehicle Types ................................................................................................................. 2-11 Observed Bus and Passenger Flows............................................................................ 2-13 Streets and Highways ............................................................................................... 2-13 Terminals .................................................................................................................... 2-14 Bus Priority Treatments ................................................................................................ 2-14 Bus Rapid Transit .......................................................................................................... 2-15 Description ................................................................................................................. 2-15 Applications ............................................................................................................... 2-16 CHAPTER 3. RAIL TRANSIT........................................................................................ 2-17 Overview ........................................................................................................................2-17 Operating Environments .............................................................................................. 2-18 Exclusive Right-of-Way ............................................................................................ 2-18 Segregated Right-of-Way ......................................................................................... 2-18 Shared Right-of-Way................................................................................................. 2-18 Rail Modes......................................................................................................................2-18 Heavy Rail .................................................................................................................. 2-18 Part 2/TRANSIT IN NORTH AMERICA Page 2-i Contents Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition Light Rail Transit ....................................................................................................... 2-21 Commuter Rail........................................................................................................... 2-24 Automated Guideway Transit (AGT)..................................................................... 2-27 Monorail ..................................................................................................................... 2-29 Funiculars, Inclines, and Elevators.......................................................................... 2-30 Aerial Ropeways........................................................................................................ 2-32 Cable Cars................................................................................................................... 2-35 CHAPTER 4. FERRY TRANSIT..................................................................................... 2-37 Overview ........................................................................................................................2-37 Service and Vessel Types.............................................................................................. 2-37 Urban Services ........................................................................................................... 2-38 Coastal Services ......................................................................................................... 2-38 Rural Services............................................................................................................. 2-38 Vessel Types............................................................................................................... 2-38 Ridership......................................................................................................................... 2-40 CHAPTER 5. STOPS, STATIONS, AND TERMINALS ........................................... 2-41 Overview ........................................................................................................................2-41 Transit Stop Types......................................................................................................... 2-41 Bus Stops..................................................................................................................... 2-42 Transit Stations .......................................................................................................... 2-42 Transit Centers........................................................................................................... 2-42 Intermodal Terminals ............................................................................................... 2-42 CHAPTER 6. REFERENCES........................................................................................... 2-43 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 2-1 U.S. Transit Systems by Size Grouping (2000) ...................................... 2-3 Exhibit 2-2 U.S. Public Transportation Providers by Mode (2000)......................... 2-3 Exhibit 2-3 Public Transit Ridership in the United States by Mode (2000) ........... 2-4 Exhibit 2-4 Top 10 U.S. and Top 5 Canadian Bus Systems Based on Annual Ridership ................................................................................................... 2-5 Exhibit 2-5 Paratransit Service Type Comparison.................................................... 2-6 Exhibit 2-6 DRT Service Pattern Types ...................................................................... 2-6 Exhibit 2-7 Busway Examples ..................................................................................... 2-8 Exhibit 2-8 HOV Lane Examples ................................................................................ 2-9 Exhibit 2-9 Arterial Street Bus Lane Examples........................................................ 2-10 Exhibit 2-10 Mixed-Traffic Operation ........................................................................ 2-10 Exhibit 2-11 Non-Rail Vehicles in Active Transit Service in the U.S. (2000) ......... 2-11 Contents Page 2-ii Part 2/TRANSIT IN NORTH AMERICA Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition Exhibit 2-12 Examples of Buses Used in Fixed-Route Service ................................ 2-12 Exhibit 2-13 Examples of Vehicles Used in Demand-Responsive Service............. 2-13 Exhibit 2-14 Observed Peak Direction Peak Hour Passenger Volumes on U.S. and Canadian Bus Transit Routes (1995-97)........................................ 2-13 Exhibit 2-15 North American BRT Applications (2002)........................................... 2-16 Exhibit 2-16 North American Rail Ridership by Mode (2000) ................................ 2-17 Exhibit 2-17 National Transit Ridership Summary (2000)....................................... 2-17 Exhibit 2-18 Comparison of Key North American Rail Mode Statistics (1995) .... 2-17 Exhibit 2-19 Heavy Rail Examples.............................................................................. 2-19 Exhibit 2-20 North American Heavy Rail
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Commuter Rail System Study
    TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Commuter Rail System Study Transit Committee March 11, 2010 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Study Purpose Study Requested by MAG Regional Council in 2008 Commuter Rail Study Funding in 2004 RTP Study Feasibility of Commuter Rail Service in MAG Region Ridership Forecasting and Cost Effectiveness Capital and Operating Cost Estimates Vehicle Technology Recommendation Implementation Requirements Copyright © 2009 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Peer Regions ~ Commuter Rail Systems WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? Peak Period, Peak Direction Service. Traditionally caries less daily riders than light rail, but for longer distances. Similar market and characteristics with Bus Rapid Transit / Express. SOUNDER-Seattle CALTRAIN-San Francisco ALTAMONT COMMUTER EXPRESS – San Jose Can share ROW and track with freight railroads and can operate concurrently (does not require exclusive right-of-way) . Typically longer station spacing (every 3-7 miles on average) than light rail (1-2 miles) with emphasis on park-and-rides and traditional city CBDs. Locomotive technology (diesel or clean/green hybrid Genset). Passenger coaches (push-pull). Engines and cars meets federally mandated structural requirements for rolling stock crash resistance Larger, heavier profile than light rail vehicles. METROLINK – Los Angeles COASTER – San Diego FRONT RUNNER – Salt Lake City-Ogden Higher max.speed (79mph), slower acceleration and deceleration than light rail. Average speed approx 44mph. Lower capital cost per mile ($10-$20M) due to existing right of way use / reuse. Light
    [Show full text]
  • Madison Avenue Dual Exclusive Bus Lane Demonstration, New York City
    HE tV 18.5 U M T A-M A-06-0049-84-4 a A37 DOT-TSC-U MTA-84-18 no. DOT- Department SC- U.S T of Transportation UM! A— 84-18 Urban Mass Transportation Administration Madison Avenue Dual Exclusive Bus Lane Demonstration - New York City j ™nsportat;on JUW 4 198/ Final Report May 1984 UMTA Technical Assistance Program Office of Management Research and Transit Service UMTA/TSC Project Evaluation Series NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. - POT- Technical Report Documentation Page TS . 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient s Catalog No. 'A'* tJMTA-MA-06-0049-84-4 'Z'i-I £ 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date MADISON AVENUE DUAL EXCLUSIVE BUS LANE DEMONSTRATION. May 1984 NEW YORK CITY 6. Performing Organization Code DTS-64 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Authors) J. Richard^ Kuzmyak : DOT-TSC-UMTA-84-18 9^ Performing Organization Name ond Address DEPARTMENT OF 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) COMSIS Corporation* transportation UM427/R4620 11501 Georgia Avenue, Suite 312 11. Controct or Grant No. DOT-TSC-1753 Wheaton, MD 20902 JUN 4 1987 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Urban Mass Transportation Admi ni strati pg LIBRARY August 1980 - May 1982 Office of Technical Assistance 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas
    Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas David P. Middendorf, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company Kenneth W. Heathington, University of Tennessee The demand for publicly owned fixed-route. fixed-schedule bus service are used for work and business-related trips to and was compared with tho demand for privately owned shared-ride taxi ser­ within CBDs and for short social, shopping, medical, vice in Davenport. Iowa, and Hicksville, New York, through on-board and personal business trips. surveys end cab company dispatch records and driver logs. The bus and In many small cities and in many suburbs of large slmrcd·ride taxi systems in Davenport com11eted for the off.peak-period travel market. During off-peak hours, the taxis tended to attract social· metropol.il;e:H!:i, l.lus~s nd taxicabs operate within tlie recreation, medical, and per onal business trips between widely scattered same jlu·isclictions and may compete for the same public origins and destinations, while the buses tended 10 attract shopping and transportation market. Two examples of small commu­ personal business trips to the CBD. The shared-ride taxi system in Hicks· nities in which buses and ta.xis coexist are Davenport, ville, in addition to providing many-to·many service, competed with the Iowa, and Hicksville, New York. The markets, eco­ counlywide bus system as a feeder system to the Long Island commuter nomic characteristics, organization, management, and railroad network. In each study area, the markets of each mode of public operation of the taxicab systems sel'Ving these commu­ transportation were similar.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Safe Siting of School Bus Stops
    Guidelines for the safe location of school bus stops 1. How are bus stops determined? Bus stops will be placed on public roadways and will avoid travel on private roads and/or driveways Bus routes are designed with buses traveling on main arterials with students picked up and dropped off at central locations. Visibility – Bus drivers need to have at least 500 feet of visible roadway to the bus stop. If there is not ample visibility (e.g. curve or hill) a “school bus stop ahead sign” is put in place before the stop in accordance with WAC 392-145-030 Bus drivers activate their school bus warning lights 300-100 feet before arriving at the bus stop, where the posted speed limit is 35 mph and under, and 500-300 feet before arriving at the bus stop where the posted speed limit is 35 mph and over. 2. Why are bus stops located at corners? Bus stops may be located at corners or intersections whenever possible. Corner stops are much more visible to drivers than house numbers. Students are generally taught to cross at corners rather than in the middle of the street. Traffic controls, such as stoplights or signs, are located at corners. These tend to slow down motorists at corners, making them more cautious as they approach intersections. The motoring public generally expects school buses to stop at corners rather than individual houses. Impatient motorists are also less likely to pass buses at corners than along a street. Cars passing school buses create the greatest risk to students who are getting on or off the bus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil
    The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil Christopher D. Barry, Bryan Duffty Planing @brid hydrofoils or partially hydrofoil supported planing boat are hydrofoils that intentionally operate in what would be the takeoff condition for a norma[ hydrofoil. They ofler a compromise ofperformance and cost that might be appropriate for ferq missions. The stepped hybrid configuration has made appearances in the high speed boat scene as early as 1938. It is a solution to the problems of instability and inefficiency that has limited other type of hybrids. It can be configured to have good seakeeping as well, but the concept has not been used as widely as would be justified by its merits. The purpose of this paper is to reintroduce this concept to the marine community, particularly for small, fast ferries. We have performed analytic studies, simple model experiments and manned experiments, andfiom them have determined some specljic problems and issues for the practical implementation of this concept. This paper presents background information, discusses key concepts including resistance, stability, seakeeping, and propulsion and suggests solutions to what we believe are the problems that have limited the widespread acceptance of this concept. Finally we propose a “strawman” design for a ferry in a particular service using this technology. BACKGROUND Partially hydrofoil supported planing hulls mix hydrofoil support and planing lift. The most obvious A hybrid hydrofoil is a vehicle combining the version of this concept is a planing hull with a dynamic lift of hydrofoils with a significant amount of hydrofoil more or less under the center of gravity. lit? tiom some other source, generally either buoyancy Karafiath (1974) studied this concept and ran model or planing lift.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Ferry History
    Woodland Ferry: Crossing the Nanticoke River from the 1740s to the present Carolann Wicks Secretary, Department of Transportation Welcome! This short history of the Woodland Ferry, which is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, was written to mark the commissioning of a new ferryboat, the Tina Fallon, in 2008. It is an interesting and colorful story. TIMELINE 1608 Captain John Smith explores 1843 Jacob Cannon Jr. murdered at the the Nanticoke River, and encounters wharf. Brother Isaac Cannon dies one Nanticoke Indians. Native Americans month later. Ferry passes to their sister have resided in the region for thousands Luraney Boling of years 1845 Inventory of Luraney Boling’s 1734 James Cannon purchases a estate includes “one wood scow, one land tract called Cannon’s Regulation at schooner, one large old scow, two small Woodland old scows, one ferry scow, one old and worn out chain cable, one lot of old cable 1743? James Cannon starts operating a chains and two scow chains, on and ferry about the wharves” 1748 A wharf is mentioned at the 1883 Delaware General Assembly ferry passes an act authorizing the Levy Court of Sussex County to establish and 1751 James Cannon dies and his son maintain a ferry at Woodland Jacob takes over the ferry 1885 William Ellis paid an annual 1766 A tax of 1,500 lbs. of tobacco salary of $119.99 by Sussex County for is paid “to Jacob Cannon for keeping operating the ferry a Ferry over Nanticoke River the Year past” 1930 Model “T” engine attached to the wooden ferryboat 1780 Jacob Cannon dies and
    [Show full text]
  • The Chicago City Manual, and Verified by John W
    CHICAGO cnT MANUAL 1913 CHICAGO BUREAU OF STATISTICS AND MUNICIPAL UBRARY ! [HJ—MUXt mfHi»rHB^' iimiwmimiimmimaamHmiiamatmasaaaa THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY I is re- The person charging this material or before the sponsible for its return on Latest Date stamped below. underlining of books Theft, mutilation, and disciplinary action and may are reasons for from the University. result in dismissal University of Illinois Library L161-O-1096 OFFICIAL CITY HALL DIRECTORY Location of the Several City Departments, Bureaus and Offices in the New City Hall FIRST FLOOR The Water Department The Fire Department Superintendent, Bureau of Water The Fire Marshal Assessor, Bureau of Water Hearing Room, Board of Local Improve^ Meter Division, Bureau of Water ments Shut-Off Division, Bureau of Water Chief Clerk, Bureau of Water Department of the City Clerk Office of the City Clerk Office of the Cashier of Department Cashier, Bureau of Water Office of the Chief Clerk to the City Clerk Water Inspector, Bureau of Water Department of the City Collector Permits, Bureau of Water Office of the City Collector Plats, Bureau of Water Office of the Deputy City Collector The Chief Clerk, Assistants and Clerical Force The Saloon Licensing Division SECOND FLOOR The Legislative Department The Board's Law Department The City Council Chamber Board Members' Assembly Room The City Council Committee Rooms The Rotunda Department of the City Treasurer Office of the City Treasurer The Chief Clerk and Assistants The Assistant City Treasurer The Cashier and Pay Roll Clerks
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox: Vermont Agency of Transportation (Vtrans) Flexible Trip Planner, Final Report
    Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox: Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) Flexible Trip Planner Final Report JANUARY 2020 FTA Report No. 0150 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Ross MacDonald Program Manager, Go! Vermont Public Transit Coordinator Vermont Agency of Transportation COVER PHOTO Image courtesy of Edwin Adilson Rodriguez, Federal Transit Administration DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox: Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) Flexible Trip Planner Final Report JANUARY 2020 FTA Report No. 0150 PREPARED BY Ross MacDonald Public Transit Coordinator Vermont Agency of Transportation Public Transit Section 219 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L 3 3 ft cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m 3 3 yd cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or "t") (or "metric ton") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION iv REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Change in the Strip
    Guiding Change in the Strip Capstone Seminar in Economic Development, Policy and Planning Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (GSPIA) University of Pittsburgh December 2002 GUIDING CHANGE IN THE STRIP University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Capstone Seminar Fall 2002 Contributing Authors: Trey Barbour Sherri Barrier Carter Bova Michael Carrigan Renee Cox Jeremy Fine Lindsay Green Jessica Hatherill Kelly Hoffman Starry Kennedy Deb Langer Beth McCall Beth McDowell Jamie Van Epps Instructor: Professor Sabina Deitrick i ii MAJOR FINDINGS This report highlights the ongoing nature of the economic, social and environmental issues in the Strip District and presents specific recommendations for Neighbors in the Strip (NITS) and policy makers to alleviate problems hindering community development. By offering a multitude of options for decision-makers, the report can serve as a tool for guiding change in the Strip District. Following is a summary of the major findings presented in Guiding Change in the Strip: • The Strip has a small residential population. As of 2000, the population was on 266 residents. Of these residents, there is a significant income gap: There are no residents earning between $25,000 and $35,000 annually. In other words, there are a limited amount of middle-income residents. Furthermore, nearly three-quarters of the 58 families living in the Strip earned less than $25,000 in 1999. These figures represent a segment of the residential population with limited voice in the development of the Strip. There is an opportunity for NITS, in collaboration with the City of Pittsburgh, to increase the presence of these residents in the future of the Strip.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]