<<

in Minnesota

Air Quality fact sheet #1.11, January 2002

Environmental What is ? Due to state and national concern about Outcomes acid rain in the 1980s, laws were passed Acid rain, more accurately known as Division that virtually eliminated the potential for acid deposition, begins with the burning acidification of Minnesota’s water of fossil fuels (such as , gas or oil) bodies. No lakes or streams in for energy. The resulting air Minnesota have been acidified, but some contains dioxide (SO ) and 2 areas of eastern North America were not (NO ). These gases x so fortunate. Areas that were damaged react in the to form various include lakes and streams in New acidic compounds, most often tracked as England and the Adirondacks of New and nitrate ions. Often carried by York. Emissions of SO winds for hundreds of miles, these 2 have been compounds may be deposited on the reduced, and will be reduced more, yet by dry deposition, a process where recovery of the most-harmed lakes and acidic or gases settle on, or are in New England may take decades absorbed by, plants, land, water or and may require further reductions in building materials. The acidic emissions from sources in North compounds may also be deposited America. through rain, snow and cloud water, pathways that are known as wet The reasons for the lack of damage in deposition. Minnesota include lower emissions than

Acid deposition at NADP monitoring sites in Minnesota 18

16

14

12

10

8 Lamberton Marcell 6 Ely (Fernberg) Camp Ripley 4 Fond du Lac Wolf Ridge 2 Grindstone Lake Voyageurs NP 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Rd. N., Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 aq1-11 (651) 296-6300, toll-free (800) 657-3864, TTY (651) 282-5332 or (800) 657-3864 This material can be made available in alternative formats for people with disabilities. Environmental Outcomes Division January 2002

in the more industrialized East, prevailing winds that Minnesota. In response, the state legislature passed often bring us relatively clean air from the west, and the Acid Deposition Control Act (Minn. Statutes more resistant geology. Acidification of lakes is just 116.42-116.45) in 1982. This act, the first of its kind one potential consequence of the poorly controlled in the nation, required the Minnesota Pollution burning of fossil fuels and the emission of SO2 and Control Agency (MPCA) to (1) identify the areas of NOx, which not only become strong , but also the state containing resources sensitive to acid become small particles in the atmosphere. deposition, (2) develop a standard to protect these resources, (3) adopt a control plan to reduce SO2 Other consequences include: emissions and (4) ensure that all Minnesota sources S As , and nitrates are a large subject to the control plan were in compliance by proportion of the small particles that penetrate January 1, 1990. The MPCA implemented all of deep into lungs during inhalation, a significant these steps, and emission sources were brought into public health concern. compliance with Minnesota’s SO2 control plan. S Sulfate and nitrate particles scatter and absorb In 1986, Minnesota became the only state to set an light, reducing visibility, which has aesthetic acid deposition standard to protect sensitive aquatic effects (e.g., on the vistas of some of our national and terrestrial . The standard limited the parks), as well as causing problems for air traffic. amount of sulfate in to an annual load of S Nitrogen deposition contributes to the 11 kilograms per hectare (kg/ha), or about 10 pounds of nitrogen-limited systems, such per acre. Sulfate deposition is monitored under the as the Chesapeake Bay. National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP). S Nitrogen deposition has caused nitrogen Representative deposition data, presented in the graph saturation of ecosystems in New England, on the first page of this fact sheet, show a general Colorado, , and Europe, which decline since the 1970s. Note that variation in natural can make more susceptible to other stresses, environmental processes produces sulfate trends that such as unusual cold. vary greatly from year to year. All NADP data from monitoring sites in Minnesota are available at S As acid rain moves through soils, it accelerates http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/state.asp?state=MN . the leaching of base cations (calcium and ) from them, delaying the recovery of As a result of studies conducted by MPCA staff and in lakes and steams in New England. In contractors, these conclusions have been made: addition, depletion of calcium from in Pennsylvania has caused extensive mortality of 1) There is no evidence that any of Minnesota’s sugar maple. lakes, including the 11 sensitive lakes that were monitored since the mid-1980s, have been S Acid deposition degrades materials beyond natural acidified by acid rain. In fact, six of the 11 , harming buildings, monuments, experienced statistically significant decreases in bridges and automobiles, and other parts of the sulfate concentrations, consistent with decreases built environment. in emissions in Minnesota and the S Nitrogen oxides contribute to the formation of rest of North America. and , which are a health concern. 2) One of the main reasons that acid-sensitive lakes in Minnesota were not acidified is because of Minnesota’s response to the acid rain threat in-lake bacterial conversion of sulfate to sulfide, Acid rain was recognized early as a potentially serious which consumes the acid that comes with the threat to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems in sulfate. Some scientists hypothesize that these

Acid rain in Minnesota PAGE 2 Environmental Outcomes Division January 2002

same bacteria also convert to innovation and competition. National SO2 emissions methylmercury, the form that accumulates in fish. have reduced significantly since 1990, especially after So, increased sulfate conversion to sulfide, which 1994, as Phase I of the federal program began in has protected Minnesota lakes from the acid in 1995. Phase I affected roughly 440 of the larger, acid rain, may contribute to enhanced mercury higher-emitting utility units, primarily in the East. contamination of fish in those lakes. The MPCA Phase II began in 2000 and extends to all the affected is examining this hypothesis with funding from sources (more than 2,000 units nationwide). the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 3) Even though the acidification threat to Minnesota Nitrogen oxides are regulated differently. The Acid lakes is very low, Minnesota should continue to Rain Program reduces NOx emissions by designating monitor a variety of lakes so that data are an emission rate for each source. However, total available on other issues that threaten lakes, such national emissions of NOx have not declined, even as lakeshore development, eutrophication, toxic though NOx emission rates from individual plants chemicals (e.g., mercury; PCBs, or have declined, because electricity production and polychlorinated biphenyls; and PBDEs, or use have increased. polybrominated diphenyl ethers), exotic species (examples are Eurasian milfoil and zebra mussels) For more information and global warming. For more information about acid rain-related research being conducted by the MPCA, contact Ed Swain, Federal action on acid rain Environmental Outcomes Division, Minnesota Congress established the National Acid Precipitation Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Rd. N., Saint Assessment Program (NAPAP) in 1980 to study the Paul, MN 55155-4194 (telephone 651/296-7800; causes and impacts of acid deposition. In 1990, email [email protected] ). NAPAP published a report, concluding that electric power generation was responsible for two-thirds of SO2 emissions and one-third of NOx emissions.

In 1990, Congress created the under Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). CAAA required significant reductions of SO2 and NOx emissions from electric utilities. By 2010, utilities would need to lower their emissions by about half (8.5 million tons) compared to 1980 levels. They would also need to reduce their NOx emissions by 2 million tons below what they would have been without the Acid Rain Program (beginning in 2000).

Sulfur dioxide reductions are being achieved using a cap-and-trade system. Although it was estimated in 1990 that compliance would cost industry $4.6 billion a year by 2010, actual costs are expected to be less than $1 billion a year, thanks to technological

Acid rain in Minnesota PAGE 3