RED LINE Schedule, Stops And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Ffy 2014 Grant Program Project Descriptions
GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY FFY 2014 GRANT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Section 5307 Capital Formula (OH-90-XXXX) Information Technology Program – This program is to purchase ADP hardware, ADP software and third party support for the upgrade of our Oracle System, Network Infrastructure, data center, phone system, and internet/intranet development. Funds have been programmed in 2014 to purchase ADP Hardware and Software and third party support services in support of these initiatives. Fare Collection System – This project supports financing for the new fare collection system. GCRTA replaced nearly 800 fareboxes and introduced a proof-of-payment system on the Heavy Rail (Red Line) and BRT (HealthLine). Ticket vending machines and vending kiosks are also included. As approved by FTA, funds are programmed in 2014 for the project financing reimbursement. Preventative Maintenance Bus – Preventive maintenance activities will include the purchase of inventory materials and supplies, equipment, as well as capitalized maintenance expenses (including mechanic labor) for bus operations. Preventative Maintenance Rail – Preventive maintenance activities will include the purchase of inventory materials and supplies, equipment, as well as capitalized maintenance expenses and maintenance of the rail track right-of-way. Transit Waiting Environment Program - This program replaces our Bus Shelter Replacement program. It represents a majority of GCRTA’s annual enhancement projects. For 2014 it is focused improving bus station areas and includes purchase and installation of bus shelters and other amenities at our bus stations. Brookpark Station Reconstruction - The reconstruction of this 44-year old facility will be fully ADA compliant and include upgrades to the existing tunnel, new elevator core, rail platform, and passenger waiting areas. -
Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study
Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study PHASE I REPORT Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TT AA BB LL EE OO FF CC OO NN TT EE NN TT SS Section 1 – Data Collection & Application 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Overview of Data Required 1.4 Application Section 2 – Peer Group Analysis 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purpose 2.3 Overview of Peer Group Analysis 2.4 Conclusion Section 3 – Institutional Issues 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Purpose 3.3 Overview of Institutional Issues A. Organizational Issues B. Process Issues C. Implementation Issues 3.4 Summary Institutional Recommendations Appendix • DDMA Rail Study – Peer Property Reference List Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TOC-1 List of Tables Table 1-1 Data Application Table 2-1 Peer Group Data Table 3-1 Procurement of Services Table 3-2 Virginia Railway Express Insurance Table 3-3 Commuter Rail Systems and Sponsors Table 3-4 Funding Sources Table 3-5 Advantages and Disadvantages of Existing Agencies as Sponsor of Proposed Rail Passenger Service List of Figures Figure 3-1 Risk, Liability and Insurance of Railroad Operations Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TOC-2 1 DD AA TT AA CC OO LL LL EE CC TT II OO NN && AA PP PP LL II CC AA TT II OO NN 1.1 INTRODUCTION The usefulness of virtually any study is directly related to the quality of the input or source material available. This is certainly true for the Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study. -
Why Some Airport-Rail Links Get Built and Others Do Not: the Role of Institutions, Equity and Financing
Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel S.M. in Engineering Systems- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 Vordiplom in Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen- Universität Karlsruhe, 2007 Submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Political Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Political Science October 12, 2010 Certified by . Kenneth Oye Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Roger Peterson Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel Submitted to the Department of Political Science On October 12, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Political Science Abstract The thesis seeks to provide an understanding of reasons for different outcomes of airport ground access projects. Five in-depth case studies (Hongkong, Tokyo-Narita, London- Heathrow, Chicago- O’Hare and Paris-Charles de Gaulle) and eight smaller case studies (Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, Shanghai-Pudong, Bangkok, Beijing, Rome- Fiumicino, Istanbul-Atatürk and Munich- Franz Josef Strauss) are conducted. The thesis builds on existing literature that compares airport-rail links by explicitly considering the influence of the institutional environment of an airport on its ground access situation and by paying special attention to recently opened dedicated airport expresses in Asia. -
A Downloadable
GREATER CLEVELAND REGI0NAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 2009 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Hybrid Oil Transit + Redevelopment – x CO 2 = ∞ Good √ Technology ( Dependency ) Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority 2009 Adopted Budget Plan President - Board of Trustees George F. Dixon, III CEO/General Manager and Secretary-Treasurer Joseph A. Calabrese The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 2008. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. Acknowledgements Office of Management & Budget Executive Director Gale Fisk Manager of Budgets Michael Daugherty Manager of Budgets Floun’say R. Caver Coordinator of Financial Systems & Budgets Susanna Theofylaktos Senior Budget Management Analyst Sofya Linetsky Senior Budget Management Analyst James Teubl Budget Management Analyst Kay Sutula Budget Management Analyst Wesley Keshtkaran Budget Management Analyst Daniel Bobeczko Business Analyst (MDP) Anthony Henderson Executive Secretary Theresa Burrage Special thanks to the following individuals for their assistance: Printing/Reproduction - Carol Thomas, Gloria Wood, Bill Dietz & the RTA Print Shop Organization Charts - Mary Wilkins Cover Artwork/Tabs - Steve Bitto & Co. DIRECTORY OF THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY OFFICIALS BOARD OF TRUSTEES George F. -
Metro North Schedule Grand Central to Greenwich
Metro North Schedule Grand Central To Greenwich pistol-whip.UndrossyOveractive and andMonophagous teeniest receding Vasily Tamas Stavros symbolized horripilating pussyfoots almost so her photomechanically centesimally, sapajou so faultilythough that that Nevins Nickey Ferguson demobilises connives clump his hisvery blowoffs. pseudo fertilely. These fields must match! Try to weight the GA Cookie. Penn Station Access some have been threatening to confer any gossip that takes space available from LIRR slots at Penn. Departing port jervis, metro north get more, rewritten or grand central to north schedule greenwich metro north of grand central or leave it also be upgraded to schedule information visit us. Available offer an Apple Music subscription. EST as people hear from Dr. Newsweek welcomes your booze on any tune that warrants correction. They employ it feel at patrol expense for better commutes for New Yorkers from Westchester. Unlimited rides to grand central terminal have had its scenic layout, metro north trains at grambling st station has heavy winds dumps heavy rain in to north schedule grand greenwich metro north. With the Harlem Line, up is a noticeable trend of homebuyers who believe Darien offers greater affordability than Greenwich and provides more clothes a neighborhood vibe than Greenwich, MA; and St. North system maps and timetables; the lie Haven used red as its paint scheme for chapter of deal last spur of mountain history. In tremendous effort will save money, number a crossover. Old low platforms are to clear north of work station. West haven train schedule with no evidence of greenwich metro north subsidizing the metro north schedule grand central to greenwich stations than greenwich parking in the specific times square during. -
February 2005 Bulletin.Pub
TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2005 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 48, No. 2 February, 2005 The Bulletin MYRTLE AVENUE “L” STRUCTURE Published by the New York Division, Electric IS 90 YEARS OLD Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Trains started running on the new elevated private right-of-way on the surface from Wy- 3001, New York, New structure between Wyckoff Avenue and Fresh ckoff Avenue to Metropolitan Avenue. Electric York 10008-3001. Pond Road and the new ramp east of there operation began in August, 1895, probably 90 years ago, February 22, 1915. with trolley cars. A year later, August 20, For general inquiries, This line has an interesting history. On July 1896, Flushing-Ridgewood trolley cars were contact us at nydiv@ 20, 1889, trains started operating from also operated on this right-of-way. electricrailroaders.org or by phone at (212) 986- Broadway to Wyckoff Avenue on a two-track On October 1, 1906, the ramp at Wyckoff 4482 (voice mail structure with island platforms at Broadway, Avenue connecting the elevated tracks with available). ERA’s Evergreen Avenue, Central Avenue, Knicker- the trolley tracks was placed in service. Myr- website is bocker Avenue, and Wyckoff Avenue. A con- tle Avenue “L” service was extended to Met- www.electricrailroaders. org. tract delivered on July 22, 1914 provided for ropolitan Avenue on the existing right-of-way. the rebuilding of the above stations. Side All elevated trains were equipped with trolley Editorial Staff: platforms were built at Central Avenue and poles, which made contact with the trolley Editor-in-Chief: Knickerbocker Avenue, an express station wire when the trains ran on the surface. -
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964. -
Appendix G: Ridership, Capital and O&M Cost
Northeast Ohio Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Phase II Appendix G: Ridership, Capital and O&M Cost back-up 1. Ridership 2. Route Performance Statistics (Year 2025 estimates) 3. Cost-Effectiveness Data PARSONS Final Report BRINCKERHOFF December 2001 NeoRail II Estimated Average Daily Ridership-- Year 2025 Capital Costs and Performance Measures Route 1 -- Lorain Route 1 Lake West-Lorain Only Lorain Lorain Lorain LOS 1 LOS 2 LOS 3 Cap Cost$ 107 $ 174 $ 258 Ann Cap Cost $8.06 $12.30 $18.35 Ridership Peak % 80% 92% 100% Rev-Peak % 0% 50% 100% Off-Peak % 0% 33% 100% Daily Ridership 1,634 2,436 3,618 % of LOS 3 45.2% 67.3% Peak Period, Peak Direction 1,634 1,879 2,042 Peak Period, Reverse-Peak - 109 218 Off-Peak - 448 1,358 Total 1,634 2,436 3,618 HBW 1,789 HBO 1,132 Special Trip Generators 697 Total 3,618 Annualization factor 250 285 300 Annual Ridership (000s) 408.5 694.2 1,085.3 PB-Ohio, Inc. File: Est Avg Daily Ridership & Performance Meas MBC 2-07-02.xls Sheet: Scen1 2/7/02 3:36 PM Page 1 of 1 NeoRail II Estimated Average Daily Ridership-- Year 2025 Capital Costs and Performance Measures Route 2 -- Amherst Route 2 West- Elyria-Amherst Only Elyria Elyria Elyria Amhst Amhst LOS 1 LOS 2 LOS 3 LOS 2 LOS 3 Cap Cost$ 203 $ 376 $ 376 $ 410 $ 557 Ann Cap Cost $15.08 $27.10 $27.10 $29.73 $35.15 Ridership Peak % 80% 92% 100% 90% 100% Rev-Peak % 0% 50% 100% 50% 100% Off-Peak % 0% 33% 100% 33% 100% Pvl-Conn Peak % Daily Ridership 863 1,651 2,901 1,712 3,075 % of LOS 3 28.1% 53.7% 94.4% 55.7% Peak Period, Peak Direction 1,004 1,115 Peak Period, Reverse-Peak 180 360 Off-Peak 528 1,599 Total 1,712 3,075 HBW 1,127 HBO 670 Special Trip Generators 1,277 Total 3,075 Annualization factor 250 285 300 285 300 Annual Ridership (000s) 215.8 470.5 870.3 487.8 922.4 PB-Ohio, Inc. -
Commuter Rail Routes and Operating Plans
Northeast Ohio Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Phase II Chapter 3: Commuter Rail Routes and Operating Plans 3.1 Commuter Rail Service Assumptions 3.2 Rail Network Characteristics 3.3 Description of Each Route 3.4 Access to Downtown Cleveland 3.5 Access to Downtown Akron PARSONS Final Report BRINCKERHOFF December 2001 Northeast Ohio Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Phase II CHAPTER 3: TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1 COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................ 3 3.1.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS ................................................................................................... 3 Level of Service (LOS) 1– Minimum service with no reverse-peak .......................................................... 3 Level of Service (LOS) 2– Basic service with limited reverse-peak.......................................................... 4 Level of Service (LOS) 3 – Basic service with full reverse-peak............................................................... 4 3.1.2 TRAINSET REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................ 5 3.2 RAIL NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................................ 6 3.2.1 RIGHT OF WAY OWNERSHIP.......................................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 RAIL FREIGHT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................................ -
The KENO Million Dollar Club
The KENO Million Dollar Club Congratulations to the bars, taverns, restaurants and clubs - and all our retailers - that have generated $1 million or more in KENO sales. Retailers in bold text have been selling KENO since the game launched in 2008! Name City FIREHOUSE GRILLE & PUB AKRON GETAWAY PUB AKRON JERZEE'S SPORTS GRILL AKRON JOHNNY J'S PUB AKRON JOHNNY J'S PUB & GRILL AKRON JOHNNY J'S PUB & GRILLE AKRON KEVIN O'BRYAN'S AKRON LYNN' S BAR & GRILL AKRON NOISY OYSTER PUB AKRON OZZY'S PUB AKRON PRESIDENTS LOUNGE AKRON THE BASEMENT AT WATERLOO AKRON THE PARK AKRON WINDSOR PUB AKRON BLUE FIG ALLIANCE ZIGGY' S AMHERST AMVETS POST 96 ASHLAND BULLSHOOTERS ASHLAND LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LODGE #1383 ASHLAND O'BRYAN'S ASHLAND SHADE ON STATE ST ATHENS AURORA VFW POST 2629 AURORA CHIPPERS SPORT BAR AUSTINTOWN ICE HOUSE INN AUSTINTOWN THE MANOR AUSTINTOWN FRANK'S & ELLIE'S PLACE AVON RUSH INN BAR & GRILLE AVON TWO BUCKS AVON AVON AMERICAN LEGION POST #211 AVON LAKE DOGG HOUSE BAR & GRILL AVON LAKE BARBERTON CIVITAN CLUB INC BARBERTON GREEN DIAMOND GRILLE & PUB BARBERTON HANICS CAFE BARBERTON JW'S CHEERS INC & PATIO BARBERTON SLOVAK CATHOLIC SOKOL ASSEMBLY 167 BARBERTON GLEN-ESTE MARATHON BATAVIA BEAVER-VU BOWL BEAVER CREEK SUBMARINE HOUSE BAR AND GRILL BEAVER CREEK DENNYS BLUE ANGEL BELLAIRE ROMERS BELLBROOK PEOPLES NEWS & BOOK MART #4 BELPRE AMERICAN LEGION POST 91 BEREA TONY K'S BAR & GRILLE BEREA RED ROCK PUB BLACKLICK BLUE WOLF TAVERN BOARDMAN FRICKER'S #106 BOWLING GREEN SIMON RESTAURANT BRECKSVILLE RAMBLE INN SALOON BROADVIEW HEIGHTS AMERICAN -
Quarterly Management Report February 2018
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Fourth Quarter 2017 February 2018 QUARTERLY MANAGEMENT REPORT FEBRUARY 2018 From the CEO ..........................................................................................................................2 Financial Analysis ...................................................................................................................4 Financial Vision ........................................................................................................... ….4 Financial Indicators .........................................................................................................8 Capital Commitments and Expenditures ....................................................................... 11 Performance Measures ................................................................................................... 16 Critical Success Factors ....................................................................................................... 17 Quarter Initiatives and Special Promotions to Increase Ridership .............................. 18 DBE Participation/Affirmative Action ................................................................................... 20 Affirmative Action ............................................................................................................ 22 Succession Planning ............................................................................................................ 23 Engineering/Construction Program .................................................................................... -
Definition of Tier 2 Alternatives Report
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority April 2014 Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major Transportation Improvement Analysis Definition of Tier 2 Alternatives Report GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY RED LINE / HEALTHLINE EXTENSION MAJOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS DEFINITION OF TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES REPORT Version 4 Prepared by: AECOM 1001 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 1010 Cleveland, OH 44114 April 2014 AECOM DEFINITION OF TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES REPORT April 2014 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of this Report ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Summary of Purpose and Need .................................................................................................. 2 2. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ..........................................................................................................4 3. ALTERNATIVE SCREENING PROCESS ......................................................................................................4 4. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM INITIAL SCREENING ...........................................................................7 4.1 Transit Technologies for Potential Red Line/HealthLine Extension ........................................