DOCSLIB.ORG

3C-Quickstartea Final for Web.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3C-Quickstartea Final for Web.Pdf 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Environmental Assessment 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Environmental Assessment Prepared Pursuant to 42 USC § 4332, 49 USC § 303, and 64 FR 28545 by Ohio Department of Transportation The following person may be contacted for information on the Environmental Assessment: Timothy M. Hill Administrator Office of Environmental Services Ohio Department of Transportation 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43223 (614) 644-0377 October 2010 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Environmental Assessment This page intentionally left blank. October 2010 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project History ....................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Project Area ........................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 Logical Termini ...................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 1-7 1.5 Purpose of 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Service .............................................. 1-7 1.6 Goals and Objectives for the 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Service ................. 1-8 1.7 Measures of Effectiveness .................................................................................... 1-9 1.8 Purpose and Need for 3C Quick Start Conventional Passenger Rail................. 1-10 1.9 Purpose and Need Summary ............................................................................. 1-16 1.10 Decisions to be Made .......................................................................................... 1-17 1.11 Connected Actions .............................................................................................. 1-18 1.12 Applicable Regulations and Permits ................................................................... 1-18 1.13 Introduction to the Tiered NEPA Process ........................................................... 1-18 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ..............................................................................................2 -1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Initial Screening Options ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Level 1 Screening of Initial Options ..........................................................2 -4 2.2.2 Level 2 Screening .................................................................................. 2-15 2.2.3 Level 2 Route Alternative Evaluations .................................................... 2-21 2.3 Alternatives Retained for Evaluation ................................................................... 2-29 2.3.1 Alternative 1 - No-Build Alternative ......................................................... 2-29 2.3.2 Alternative 2 – North Segment 1: Direct Route Cleveland-Columbus plus South Segment 30: Direct Route-Columbus-Cincinnati ................................... 2-31 2.3.3 Alternative 3 – North Segment 8: Cleveland-Akron-Barberton-Columbus plus South Segment 30: Direct Route-Columbus-Oasis-Cincinnati ................. 2-31 2.3.4 Alternative 4 – North Segment 1: Direct Route Cleveland-Columbus plus South Segment 29: Direct Route South-Columbus-Cincinnati (Longworth/CUT) 2- 32 2.3.5 Alternative 5 – North Segment 1: Direct Route Cleveland-Columbus plus South Segment 32: Hamilton-Cincinnati ......................................................... 2-32 2.4 Evaluation of Alternatives .................................................................................... 2-33 2.4.1 Alternative Evaluations ........................................................................... 2-37 2.4.2 Recommended Preferred Alternative ..................................................... 2-41 2.4.3 Alignment Alternatives including Proposed Capacity Improvements ...... 2-42 2.5 Detailed Station Alternatives ............................................................................... 2-45 2.5.1 Stations ..................................................................................................2 -45 2.5.2 Yard and Shop Alternatives .................................................................... 2-49 2.6 Preferred Alternative ........................................................................................... 2-50 Page i October 2010 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Environmental Assessment 2.6.1 Service Location: Cleveland ................................................................... 2-50 2.6.2 Service Location: Southwest Cleveland ................................................. 2-51 2.6.3 Service Location: Columbus ................................................................... 2-52 2.6.4 Service Location: Springfield (phased) ................................................... 2-53 2.6.5 Service Location: East Dayton (phased) ................................................ 2-54 2.6.6 Service Location: Dayton ....................................................................... 2-54 2.6.7 Service Location: North Cincinnati ......................................................... 2-54 2.6.8 Service Location: Cincinnati ................................................................... 2-55 2.7 Next Steps/Construction Phasing ....................................................................... 2-56 2.7.1 Segment 1 (Cleveland to Columbus) ...................................................... 2-57 2.7.2 Segment 2 (Columbus to North Cincinnati) ............................................ 2-60 2.7.3 Segment 3 (North Cincinnati to Cincinnati) ............................................. 2-61 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .... 3-1 3.1 Physical Environment ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Air Quality ................................................................................................3 -1 3.1.2 Energy .....................................................................................................3 -6 3.1.3 Noise and Vibration ..................................................................................3 -7 3.1.4 Visual Resources ................................................................................... 3-19 3.1.5 Potential Impacts ................................................................................... 3-22 3.1.6 Conclusion .............................................................................................3 -22 3.2 Ecological Systems ............................................................................................. 3-22 3.2.1 Floodplains ............................................................................................3 -22 3.2.2 Wetland, Waterbody, and Waterway Permits ......................................... 3-26 3.2.3 Wetlands, Waterbodies, and Waterways ................................................ 3-27 3.2.4 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................... 3-37 3.3 Human Environment ........................................................................................... 3-41 3.3.1 Transportation ........................................................................................ 3-41 3.3.2 Land Use ...............................................................................................3 -44 3.3.3 Environmental Justice ............................................................................ 3-53 3.3.4 Public Health and Safety ........................................................................ 3-57 3.3.5 Hazardous Materials .............................................................................. 3-58 3.3.6 Cultural Resources ................................................................................ 3-61 3.4 Section 4(f) Resources ........................................................................................ 3-64 3.4.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................ 3-64 3.4.2 Potential Impacts ................................................................................... 3-65 3.4.3 Conclusions ........................................................................................... 3-65 3.4.4 Section 6(f) Resources ........................................................................... 3-66 3.5 Construction Impacts .......................................................................................... 3-74 3.6 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts ................................................................... 3-77 3.6.1 Project Area ........................................................................................... 3-77 Page ii October 2010 3C Quick Start Passenger Rail Environmental Assessment 3.6.2 Project Area Features and Goals ........................................................... 3-78 3.6.3 Reasonably Foreseeable Impact-Causing Activities ............................... 3-80 3.6.4 Secondary Impacts ................................................................................ 3-80 3.6.5 Cumulative Impacts................................................................................ 3-80
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • WALGREENS 183 E Dayton Yellow Springs Road Fairborn, OH 45324 TABLE of CONTENTS
    NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING WALGREENS 183 E Dayton Yellow Springs Road Fairborn, OH 45324 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Profile II. Location Overview III. Market & Tenant Overview Executive Summary Photographs Demographic Report Investment Highlights Aerial Market Overview Property Overview Site Plan Tenant Overview Map NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING DISCLAIMER STATEMENT DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Offering Memorandum is proprietary and strictly confidential. STATEMENT: It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from The Boulder Group and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of The Boulder Group. This Offering Memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. The Boulder Group has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation. The information contained in this Offering Memorandum has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, The Boulder Group has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has The Boulder Group conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. All potential buyers must take appropriate measures to verify all of the information set forth herein. NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE The Boulder Group is pleased to exclusively market for sale a single tenant net leased Walgreens property located SUMMARY: in Fairborn, Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • FLAT ROCK MASTER PLAN CITY of FLAT ROCK CITY COUNCIL Resolution 03-20-05
    MASTER PLAN 2017 CITY OF FLAT ROCK, MICHIGAN MARCH 2017 Master Plan 2017 City of Flat Rock, Michigan Prepared by: 235 East Main Street, Suite 105 Northville, Michigan 48167 Telephone: (248) 596-0920 Facsimile: (248) 596-0930 www.mcka.com RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION CITY OF FLAT ROCK MASTER PLAN CITY OF FLAT ROCK CITY COUNCIL Resolution 03-20-05 Motion by Martin Supported by Wrobel RESOLVED, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing upon the expiration of the deadline for comment by the required entities to review the proposed Master Plan on January 23, 2017, pursuant to Public Act 33 of 2008, the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, MCL 125.3801 et. seq., and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved the Master Plan by adopting a resolution by the affirmative vote of at least 2/3 of its members on February 27, 2017, and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Planning Commission has now submitted a copy of the Master Plan to the Flat Rock City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council asserted its right to approve or reject the Master Plan by adopting Council Resolution 10-03-09, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is now requesting that the City Council approve the Master Plan as submitted; therefore be it RESOLVED, that a statement recording this approval shall be signed by the City Clerk and shall be included on the inside of the front or back cover of the Master Plan and Future Land Use Map; be it further RESOLVED, that the Secretary of the Planning Commission is hereby authorized to submit copies of the adopted Master Plan to the required entities in accordance with the law; be it further RESOLVED, that this resolution is given immediate effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Diaries 1857-1917
    1886 Friday, January 1 I am thousands of miles from home. church-one acre, too far out-and Suman went with Mr. Thompson takes me to Downey (Cal.) for the 7:00 him. Mr. Hayt came and we went out to look at the train, Bro. King having given out going with me. At Los addition which he is interested in & indicated that they Angeles, buy a ticket to Colton. Go up town-post of­ would give us a lot to build church on. Dine at Hall's. fice- up the hill-a way out. Call but do not see Reuben At 7:00 pr. at Suman's, Mark 8:36. Stay at Suman's. Rev. Baker. Go with Elisha Luke, wife, & Miss Jennie King & McKee! came. McComb to Colton & Riverside. Stay at Peter Suman's. Saturday, January 9 Visit the valley again with Bro. Saturday, January 2 Dine at Reuben Hall's. Luke's staid Suman, Revs. A.N. King & D. McKee!. Magnolia Ave., there last night & remained to-day. Go back to Peter 150 ft wide. At Shumaker's, climb butce. Dine at Henry Suman's having in forenoon called on Rev. Selah W Cole's. Hart's cluster-oranges. Ascend Rubidoux in the Brown, M.E. Pastor. Pr. at 7:00 at Y.M.C.A. Hall Eph afternoon (500 ft high) & see Santa Anna River, Arrow­ 2:4. Stay at Halls. Their children, Samuel aged 20, Wil­ head Mt., San Bernardino, & look on town & orange liam I 5, Harvey 12, George 7, and two married daugh­ groves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cortland Savings & Banking
    PUBLIC DISCLOSURE September 10, 2007 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The Cortland Savings and Banking Company 846619 194 West Main Street Cortland, Ohio 44410 Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland P.O. Box 6387 Cleveland, OH 44101-1387 NOTE: This document is an evaluation of this institution's record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound operation of the institution. This evaluation is not, nor should it be construed as, an assessment of the financial condition of this institution. The rating assigned to this institution does not represent an analysis, conclusion or opinion of the federal financial supervisory agency concerning the safety and soundness of this financial institution. The Cortland Saving and Banking Company, Cortland Ohio CRA Examination Cortland, Ohio September 10, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Institution’s CRA Rating ................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of examination ................................................................................................................... 1 Description of Institution................................................................................................................ 3 Conclusion with Respect to Performance Tests ........................................................................... 4 Description of the Assessment Areas ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Department of Transportation • News Release ODOT Seeking Public Comment on Transportation Plan
    Ohio Department of Transportation • News Release DIVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS 1980 West Broad Street • Columbus, Ohio 43223 www.transportation.ohio.gov ODOT Seeking Public Comment on Transportation Plan The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) hereby notifies all interested persons that a draft long range transportation plan called Access Ohio 2040, an update to Ohio’s long-range transportation plan, is available for review and comment. Access Ohio 2040 is a vision for Ohio’s future transportation system that includes eleven recommendations which will guide, inform, and support ODOT’s policies and investment strategies in the coming years. You may provide your comments at www.accessohio2040.com or by visiting one of the locations identified below. Comments concerning Access Ohio 2040 may be submitted through the above website, by e- mail [email protected], or by mail: Jennifer Townley Division of Planning Attn: Charles Dyer Ohio Department of Transportation Mail Stop #3280 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, OH 43223 Written comments must be received by the close of business on January 15, 2014 ODOT Offices: ODOT District 1: 1885 North McCullough St. – Lima, Ohio 45801 ODOT District 2: 317 East Poe Rd. – Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 ODOT District 3: 906 Clark Avenue – Ashland, Ohio 44805 ODOT District 4: 2088 S. Arlington Road. – Akron, Ohio 44306 ODOT District 5: 9600 Jacksontown Road – Jacksontown, OH 43030 ODOT District 6: 400 E. William Street – Delaware, Ohio 43015 ODOT District 7: 1001 Saint Marys Avenue - Sidney, Ohio 45365 ODOT District 7, Poe Avenue Facility: 5994 Poe Avenue – Dayton, Ohio 45414 ODOT District 8: 505 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study
    Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study PHASE I REPORT Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TT AA BB LL EE OO FF CC OO NN TT EE NN TT SS Section 1 – Data Collection & Application 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Overview of Data Required 1.4 Application Section 2 – Peer Group Analysis 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purpose 2.3 Overview of Peer Group Analysis 2.4 Conclusion Section 3 – Institutional Issues 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Purpose 3.3 Overview of Institutional Issues A. Organizational Issues B. Process Issues C. Implementation Issues 3.4 Summary Institutional Recommendations Appendix • DDMA Rail Study – Peer Property Reference List Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TOC-1 List of Tables Table 1-1 Data Application Table 2-1 Peer Group Data Table 3-1 Procurement of Services Table 3-2 Virginia Railway Express Insurance Table 3-3 Commuter Rail Systems and Sponsors Table 3-4 Funding Sources Table 3-5 Advantages and Disadvantages of Existing Agencies as Sponsor of Proposed Rail Passenger Service List of Figures Figure 3-1 Risk, Liability and Insurance of Railroad Operations Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TOC-2 1 DD AA TT AA CC OO LL LL EE CC TT II OO NN && AA PP PP LL II CC AA TT II OO NN 1.1 INTRODUCTION The usefulness of virtually any study is directly related to the quality of the input or source material available. This is certainly true for the Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study.
    [Show full text]
  • ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives
    ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives Michelle Bergin, GA Environmental Protection Division Matthew Harrell, IL Environmental Protection Agency Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium Acknowledgments: Steve Sullivan, American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association David Powell, Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Dennis McGeen, Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Lisa Higgins, Maine Dept. of Environmental Protection Laurel Driver, US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Support Byeong Kim, GA Environmental Protection Division Introduction Air protection agencies from twenty-seven states, coordinated through the Eastern Regional Technical Advisory Committee (ERTAC) and headed by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), identified a need to better quantify and characterize rail-related emissions inventories. Traditional locomotives utilize large diesel engines, resulting in emissions of NO x, diesel PM, hydrocarbons, greenhouse gases, and other air pollutants. These emissions are sometimes concentrated in areas exceeding National Ambient Air Quality Standards. No cohesive nationwide railroad emission estimates based on local operations are known to have been made previously. Inventory development methods for locomotive emissions estimates vary from state to state and, in general, lack the spatial or temporal resolution needed to support air quality modeling and planning 1-5. The ERTAC Rail Subcommittee (ERTAC Rail) was established with active representatives from twelve member states, three regional planning offices, and the US EPA. The subcommittee’s goals are to (1) standardize agencies’ inventory development methods through a collaborative effort, (2) improve the quality of data received and the resulting emission inventories, and (3) reduce the administrative burden on railroad companies of providing data.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Some Airport-Rail Links Get Built and Others Do Not: the Role of Institutions, Equity and Financing
    Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel S.M. in Engineering Systems- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 Vordiplom in Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen- Universität Karlsruhe, 2007 Submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Political Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Political Science October 12, 2010 Certified by . Kenneth Oye Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Roger Peterson Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel Submitted to the Department of Political Science On October 12, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Political Science Abstract The thesis seeks to provide an understanding of reasons for different outcomes of airport ground access projects. Five in-depth case studies (Hongkong, Tokyo-Narita, London- Heathrow, Chicago- O’Hare and Paris-Charles de Gaulle) and eight smaller case studies (Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, Shanghai-Pudong, Bangkok, Beijing, Rome- Fiumicino, Istanbul-Atatürk and Munich- Franz Josef Strauss) are conducted. The thesis builds on existing literature that compares airport-rail links by explicitly considering the influence of the institutional environment of an airport on its ground access situation and by paying special attention to recently opened dedicated airport expresses in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • TAC, CIC and Policy Committee Meeting Packet
    Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study December 2013 Committee Meetings TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thursday, December 12, 2013, 1:30 p.m. Stow Safety Building 3800 Darrow Road, Stow CITIZENS INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE Thursday, December 12, 2013, 7:00 p.m. Meeting Room 1 Akron-Summit County Public Library - Main Library, 60 South High Street, Akron POLICY COMMITTEE Thursday, December 19, 2013, 1:30 p.m. PLEASE NOTE NEW MEETING LOCATION: Quaker Station, Quaker Square Inn, The University of Akron Hotel 135 South Broadway, Akron AMATS POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING UNIVERSITY OF AKRON QUAKER SQUARE M ILL ST E V ^_ A FR Y EE PA A RK ING W D A ^_ O R B ^_ ^_ PARKING ENTRANCE ´ ^_ BUILDING ENTRANCE Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study Policy Committee Quaker Station, Quaker Square Inn The University of Akron Hotel 135 South Broadway, Akron, Ohio Thursday, December 19, 2013 1:30 p.m. Agenda 1. Call to Order A. Determination of a Quorum Oral B. Audience Participation* 2. Minutes - Motion Required A. September 25, 2013 Meeting Attachment 2A 3. Staff Reports A. Financial Progress Report - Motion Required Attachment 3A B. Technical Progress Report Oral C. AMATS Federal Funds Report Attachment 3C 4. Old Business 5. New Business A. AMATS: The State of Our Region’s Transportation Infrastructure Attachment 5A B. Bicycle Related Crashes 2010-2012 Attachment 5B 6. Resolutions A. Resolution 2013-17 – Conformity Determination and Concurrence Attachment 6A with the Revised Air Quality Conformity Analyses for the Cleveland- Akron Air Quality Area Necessitated by the Amendment to Transportation Outlook 2035 and FY 2014-2017 TIP.
    [Show full text]
  • Reader Spread
    2006 PROGRESS REPORT ON COMMUNITY OUTCOMES, INDICATORS AND STRATEGIES MONTGOMERY COUNTY FAMILY AND CHILDREN FIRST COUNCIL Table of Contents Letter from the Chair 1 POSITIVE LIVING FOR Strategic Community Initiatives 70 SPECIAL POPULATIONS Results-Based Accountability: 2 Positive Living for Special 36 Community-Based Projects The FCFC’s Use of Outcomes Populations Outcome Team Report Inter-Agency Collaboration 72 and Indicators Help Me Grow 40 Child Fatality Review 73 Nursing Home Population 42 Calendar Art Contest 74 HEALTHY PEOPLE Healthy People Outcome 4 People with Developmental 43 Brother Raymond L. Fitz, 75 Team Report Disabilities Competitively Employed S.M., Ph.D. Award Low Birth Weight 7 People with Developmental 44 Funding Activities and Review Disabilities Working in Enclaves Premature Mortality 8 Supported Services 76 Day-to-Day Living for 45 9 Childhood Immunizations Mentally Ill Adults Dayton Development 76 10 Coalition Review Process Access to Health Care Level of Functioning for 46 Behind the Numbers: Mentally Ill Youth Family and Children First Council 77 Access to Health Care 11 Successful Substance Abuse 47 State Duties Treatment Family and Children 78 First Council Roster YOUNG PEOPLE SUCCEEDING Behind the Numbers: 48 Young People Succeeding 13 Level of Functioning for Staff and Additional Support 79 Outcome Team Report Mentally Ill Youth 2006 Honors and Accomplishments 80 Mentoring Collaborative 16 Sinclair Fast Forward Center 17 SAFE AND SUPPORTIVE Data Sources 81 Teen Pregnancy Prevention 17 NEIGHBORHOODS Safe Neighborhoods
    [Show full text]
  • A Downloadable
    GREATER CLEVELAND REGI0NAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 2009 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Hybrid Oil Transit + Redevelopment – x CO 2 = ∞ Good √ Technology ( Dependency ) Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority 2009 Adopted Budget Plan President - Board of Trustees George F. Dixon, III CEO/General Manager and Secretary-Treasurer Joseph A. Calabrese The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 2008. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. Acknowledgements Office of Management & Budget Executive Director Gale Fisk Manager of Budgets Michael Daugherty Manager of Budgets Floun’say R. Caver Coordinator of Financial Systems & Budgets Susanna Theofylaktos Senior Budget Management Analyst Sofya Linetsky Senior Budget Management Analyst James Teubl Budget Management Analyst Kay Sutula Budget Management Analyst Wesley Keshtkaran Budget Management Analyst Daniel Bobeczko Business Analyst (MDP) Anthony Henderson Executive Secretary Theresa Burrage Special thanks to the following individuals for their assistance: Printing/Reproduction - Carol Thomas, Gloria Wood, Bill Dietz & the RTA Print Shop Organization Charts - Mary Wilkins Cover Artwork/Tabs - Steve Bitto & Co. DIRECTORY OF THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY OFFICIALS BOARD OF TRUSTEES George F.
    [Show full text]