DOCSLIB.ORG

Definition of Tier 2 Alternatives Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Definition of Tier 2 Alternatives Report Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority April 2014 Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major Transportation Improvement Analysis Definition of Tier 2 Alternatives Report GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY RED LINE / HEALTHLINE EXTENSION MAJOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS DEFINITION OF TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES REPORT Version 4 Prepared by: AECOM 1001 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 1010 Cleveland, OH 44114 April 2014 AECOM DEFINITION OF TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES REPORT April 2014 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of this Report ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Summary of Purpose and Need .................................................................................................. 2 2. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ..........................................................................................................4 3. ALTERNATIVE SCREENING PROCESS ......................................................................................................4 4. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM INITIAL SCREENING ...........................................................................7 4.1 Transit Technologies for Potential Red Line/HealthLine Extension ......................................... 7 4.1.1 Bus Rapid Transit ....................................................................................................................... 7 4.1.2 Bus Rapid Transit Lite (BRT Lite) ............................................................................................... 7 4.1.3 Heavy Rail Transit ...................................................................................................................... 7 4.1.4 Diesel-Multiple Unit (DMU) ......................................................................................................... 8 4.1.5 Rapid+ ........................................................................................................................................ 8 4.2 Alignment Options Considered .................................................................................................. 8 4.2.1 Alternative B ............................................................................................................................. 10 4.2.2 Alternative D ............................................................................................................................. 10 4.2.3 Alternative E ............................................................................................................................. 10 4.2.4 Alternative G ............................................................................................................................ 10 5. REFINEMENTS TO ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Alternative B ............................................................................................................................... 11 5.1.1 Operating Refinements to Alternative B .................................................................................... 11 5.1.2 Station Refinements to Alternative B ........................................................................................ 11 5.2 Alternative D ............................................................................................................................... 11 5.3 Alignment Alternative E ............................................................................................................. 12 5.3.1 Operating Refinements to Alternative E .................................................................................... 12 5.3.2 Station Refinements to Alternative E ........................................................................................ 14 5.4 Alignment Alternative G ............................................................................................................ 16 5.4.1 Operating Refinements to Alternative G ................................................................................... 16 5.4.2 Station Refinements to Alternative G ........................................................................................ 17 i AECOM DEFINITION OF TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES REPORT April 2014 5.5 Summary of Refinements to Build Alternatives ....................................................................... 19 6. BASELINE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................................ 20 6.1 No Build Alternative ................................................................................................................... 20 6.1.1 Transit Service Characteristics ................................................................................................. 20 6.1.2 Roadway Service Characteristics ............................................................................................. 21 6.2 Do Minimum Enhanced Bus Alternative ................................................................................... 22 6.2.1 Transit Service Improvements .................................................................................................. 22 7. BUILD ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................................ 26 7.1 Alternative B ............................................................................................................................... 26 7.1.1 Physical Description ................................................................................................................. 26 7.1.2 Technologies ............................................................................................................................ 26 7.1.3 Operations ................................................................................................................................ 26 7.1.4 Passenger Facilities ................................................................................................................. 27 7.1.5 Maintenance Facilities .............................................................................................................. 27 7.1.6 Supporting Bus Services .......................................................................................................... 27 7.2 Alternative E ............................................................................................................................... 31 7.2.1 Physical Description ................................................................................................................. 32 7.2.2 Technologies ............................................................................................................................ 32 7.2.3 Operations ................................................................................................................................ 32 7.2.4 Passenger Facilities ................................................................................................................. 33 7.2.5 Maintenance Facilities .............................................................................................................. 34 7.2.6 Supporting Bus Services .......................................................................................................... 34 7.3 Alternative G .............................................................................................................................. 36 7.3.1 Physical Description ................................................................................................................. 37 7.3.2 Technologies ............................................................................................................................ 37 7.3.3 Operations ................................................................................................................................ 37 7.3.4 Passenger Facilities ................................................................................................................. 37 7.3.5 Maintenance Facilities .............................................................................................................. 38 7.3.6 Supporting Bus Services .......................................................................................................... 38 8. NEXT STEPS ................................................................................................................................................... 40 APPENDIX A-1 TIER 1 ALIGNMENT FIGURES ............................................................................................ A1-1 APPENDIX A-2 TIER 2 ALIGNMENT FIGURES ............................................................................................ A2-1 ii AECOM DEFINITION OF TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES REPORT April 2014 List of Tables TABLE ‎3-1: CRITERIA USED IN THE TIER 1 SCREENING………………………………………………………………5 TABLE ‎4-1: SUMMARY OF EVALUATION RESULTS .................................................................................................9 TABLE ‎6-1: SERVICE SPAN – NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States
    BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States By: Andrew Degerstrom September 2018 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................1 Economic Development and Transit-Oriented Development ...................2 Definition of Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................2 Literature Review ..................................................................................3 BRT Economic Development Outcomes ...................................................3 Factors that Affect the Success of BRTOD Implementation .....................5 Case Studies ...........................................................................................7 Cleveland HealthLine ................................................................................7 Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway East Liberty Station ..... 11 Pittsburgh Uptown-Oakland BRT and the EcoInnovation District .......... 16 BRTOD at home, the rapid bus A Line and the METRO Gold Line .........20 Conclusion .............................................................................................23 References .............................................................................................24 Artist rendering of Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood and the Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Introduction Purpose of this Report If Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What Is the MUTCD?
    National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Bus/BRT Applications Introduction • I am Steve Andrle from TRB standing in for Randy McCourt, DKS Associates and 2019 ITE International Vice President • I co-manage with Claire Randall15 TRB public transit standing committees. • I want to bring you up to date on planned bus- oriented improvements to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What is the MUTCD? • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Standards for roadway signs, signals, and markings • Authorized in 23 CFR, Part 655: It is an FHWA document. • National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD) develops content • Sponsored by 19 organizations including ITE, AASHTO, APTA and ATSSA (American Traffic Safety Services Association) Background • Bus rapid transit, busways, and other bus applications have expanded greatly since the last edition of the MUTCD in 2009 • The bus-related sections need to be updated • Much of the available research speaks to proposed systems, not actual experience • The NCUTCD felt it was a good time to survey actual systems to see what has worked, what didn’t work, and to identify gaps. National Survey • The NCUTCD established a task force with APTA and FTA • Working together they issued a survey in April of 2018. I am sure some of you received it. • The results will be released to the NCUTCD on June 20 – effectively now • I cannot give you any details until the NCUTCD releases the findings Survey Questions • Have you participated in design and/or operations of
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
    Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Joe Calabrese - General Manager RTA Ridership by Mode ! 500 Buses - 75 % ! 60 Heavy Rail Vehicles - 10% ! 24 RTV’s (BRT) - 8% ! 48 Light Rail Vehicles - 6% ! Paratransit - 100 vehicles - 1% RTA Fleet GCRTA HealthLine Euclid Avenue Transformation Euclid Avenue History Euclid Avenue History Alternatives Analysis - late 1990’s ! Subway ! Light Rail ! Do Nothing (keep the #6 bus) ! Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Mode Selection Criteria ! Capacity (30,000 + daily customers) ! Connectivity ! Funding possibilities (FTA) ! Cost - capital and operating ! Economic development potential " Renew Aging Infrastructure Vision for the “Silver Line” BRT ! “Rail Like” Image ! Fast ! Simple ! Safe ! First Class ! Help Revitalize Corridor Euclid Corridor Project ! 9.38 miles long ! 36 stations (from 100 bus stops) ! Travel time from 40 to 28 minutes ! Building face to building face ! Pedestrian and bicycle friendly ! Landscape/hardscape treatment ! Pubic Art - Integrated/stand-alone Exclusive Right of Way Funding Pie Charts FTA 80% ODOT 20% 2000 ODOT FTA 25% 50% City MPO RTA 2004 Ground Breaking October 2004 “Silver Line” Construction “Silver Line” Construction (3.5 years) “Silver Line” Construction “Silver Line” Construction “Silver Line” Construction “Rail Like” Image ! Reduced Travel Time " Multi-Door Boarding " Exclusive Right-of-Way " Traffic Signal Prioritization " Higher Travel Speeds " Level Boarding " Precision Docking " Rear Facing Wheel Chair Restraints " Off-Board Fare Collection “Rail Like” Image ! Hi-Frequency
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Toolbox: BRT Person Throughput-Vehicle Congestion Tradeoffs
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Toolbox: BRT Person Throughput-Vehicle Congestion Tradeoffs Jingquan Li, Jacob Tsao, Ching-yao Chan, Kun Zhou, and Wei-Bin Zhang UCB-ITS-PRR-2015-02 California PATH University of California Berkeley March 11, 2015 Page 1 of 54 ADA Notice Individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternative formats. For information call (916) 654-6410, or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Records and forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS- 89, Sacramento, CA 95814 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE TR0003 (REV. 10/98) 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG NUMBER CA 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE December 2014 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Toolbox: BRT Person Throughput- 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE Vehicle Congestion Tradeoffs 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Jingquan Li, Jacob Tsao, Ching-yao Chan, Kun Zhou, UCB-ITS-PRR-2015-02 and Wei-Bin Zhang 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER California PATH Program, University of California at Berkeley 1357 46th St., Richmond, CA 94804 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Irvine 4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Bldg., Irvine, CA 92697 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Division of Research and Innovation 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE P.O. Box 942873, MS 83 Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES 16. ABSTRACT This report documents a research effort to understand the current practice and issues associated with Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) planning and deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctfastrak Existing Condition
    Hartford Line TOD Action Plan Desire & Readiness Workshop: Town of Windsor Locks October 20, 2016 State Project No. 170-3396 1 Task 8 Agenda 1. Project Background and Overview 2. TOD Principles and Precedents 3. CTrail Hartford Line Station Area Assessment • TOD Desire & Readiness Criteria • Initial Observations from the Project Team 4. Interactive Workshop • Preliminary Areas of Focus • Instructions 2 Project Background Establishing a Point of Departure in Windsor Locks • Hartford Line TOD Action Plan • Town of Windsor Locks POCD Update • Main Street Property Acquisition and • Windsor Locks TOD Study Pre-Development (OPM) • Making it Happen • CRCOG Regional Complete Streets Policy and Action Plan (OPM) • Historic Train Station Reuse Study Windsor Locks Downtown • Capitol Region Master Plan Transportation Plan 2007 2008 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Ongoing/Forthcoming • Incentive Housing Downtown TIF Zone Study District Master Plan • Capital Region POCD Town of Windsor Locks EA/EIE for NHHS Rail Program POCD 3 Project Background Initial Thoughts from the Project Team: Key Issues to Advance TOD in Windsor Locks Reinvigorate downtown/Main Street Activate and maximize development as a destination potential of catalytic sites in the station area . Address lasting impacts of urban . Target sites and recommended sequencing renewal, and change the mindset of Main have been identified, but there are Street as a pass through outstanding questions: . Find a balance between maintaining • What can be done to make sites more traffic flow and creating a pedestrian- attractive to potential developers? and bicycle-friendly downtown • Are there opportunities to assemble a critical mass of sites to enable a larger . Consider developing a downtown development proposition? parking strategy 4 Source: Windsor Locks TOD Study Project Background Funding through FTA Pilot Program for TOD Planning .
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
    Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Joe Calabrese – General Manager Greater Cleveland RTA Overview . Service Area 59 municipalities 500 square miles Population of 1.5 million . Customers Served 200,000 on a typical weekday 1 RTA Overview . Services Modes 500 Buses 100 Paratransit Vans 20 Job Access Vans 60 Heavy Rail Vehicles 48 Light Rail Vehicles 24 RTV’s - (HealthLine BRT) 2 RTA Fleet 3 GCRTA HealthLine Euclid Avenue Transformation Euclid Avenue History 4 Euclid Avenue History Euclid Avenue History . Streetcars disappeared in 1954 . # 6 Bus Route put in service Great Service with Low Image . Alternative Analysis Subway or Light Rail Do Nothing (keep the #6 bus) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 5 Mode Selection Criteria . Capacity (30,000 + daily customers) . Connectivity . Funding possibilities (FTA) . Cost Capital Operating . Economic development potential Vision for the “Silver Line” . “Rail-Like” Image . Fast . Simple . Safe . First Class . Promote Economic Development 6 Euclid Corridor Project – 9.38 Miles . 36 stations . Travel time from 28 to 40 minutes . Building face to building face . Pedestrian friendly with bike lanes . Landscape/hardscape treatment 1,500 trees with irrigation . Integrated/stand-alone public art 7 Ground Breaking October 2004 8 Funding Pie Charts - $200 Million FTA 80% ODOT 20% 2000 ODOT FTA 25% 50% City MPO RTA 2004 Exclusive Right of Way 9 10 11 “Rail-Like” Characteristics . Quicker Travel Times Exclusive Right-of-Way Higher Travel Speed Limit Traffic Signal Prioritization Precision Docking Level Boarding “Stations” Off Board Fare Collection 12 “Rail-Like” Service and Image . Hi-Frequency Service 24x7 Peak every 5 minutes Off-Peak every 8 to 15 minutes .
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bus Rapid Transit Feasiblity Study
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 MODES AND TRENDS THAT FACILITATE BRT ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Microtransit ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Shared Mobility .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Mobility Hubs ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Curbside Management .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3 VEHICLES THAT SUPPORT BRT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Automated Vehicles .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Student Handbook 2019-2020
    Student Handbook 2019-2020 Connect Engage Plan Succeed Connect Engage Plan Succeed Welcome to Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C®)! We are excited that you have chosen to begin your educational journey with us. The entire Tri-C community is dedicated to helping you reach your educational goals. Tri-C offers you one door with many options for success. Whether your plan is to transfer, prepare for a new career or enroll in personal enrichment courses, Tri-C will ensure you have a rich college experience and that you leave prepared for what lies ahead. The Office of Student Affairs created this student handbook to guide you through your educational experience. It will help you create plans leading to certificate and associate degree completion, transfer to a four-year institution or transition into a new career. This handbook contains college survival information for new students, comprehensive resources for continuing students and information about activities that support learning. For students who will be participating in the First Year Experience, this handbook may also serve as the textbook for your First Year Student Success Seminar. Throughout your first year, we will provide you with resources and information to help you develop essential skills like time management, goal setting and creating and following an academic plan. We encourage you to reference this handbook throughout your enrollment at Tri-C. While this handbook is a great resource, it may not answer every question. For additional guidance, please contact the Student Affairs offices located on each campus. The Tri-C team looks forward to being an active part of your success! This student handbook is intended for informational purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland Mayor Ralph J. Perk: Strong Leadership During Troubled Times
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland Memory Books Summer 7-2013 Cleveland Mayor Ralph J. Perk: Strong Leadership During Troubled Times Richard Klein Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevmembks Part of the United States History Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Klein, Richard, "Cleveland Mayor Ralph J. Perk: Strong Leadership During Troubled Times" (2013). Cleveland Memory. 18. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevmembks/18 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Books at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland Memory by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cleveland Mayor Ralph J. Perk: Strong Leadership During Troubled Times Cleveland Mayor Ralph J. Perk: Strong Leadership During Troubled Times Richard Klein, Ph.D Cleveland Mayor Ralph J. Perk: Strong Leadership During Troubled Times Richard Klein, Ph.D An online accessible format of this book can be found at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevmembks/18/ The digital version is brought to you for free and open access at EngagedScholarship@CSU. 2013 MSL Academic Endeavors Imprint of Michael Schwartz Library at Cleveland State University Published by MSL Academic Endeavors Cleveland State University Michael Schwartz Library 2121 Euclid Avenue Rhodes Tower, Room 501 Cleveland, Ohio 44115 http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/ ISBN: 978-1-936323-02-9 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License CLEVELAND MAYOR RALPH J. PERK STRONG LEADERSHIP DURING TROUBLED TIMES TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 3 Acknowledgments 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: Pressing New Urban Challenges 8 Chapter 2: The Life and Times of Ralph J.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Audit Assistance
    GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY INTERNAL AUDIT QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter - 20192009 May,May, 20092019 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY 1, 2019 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) INTRODUCTION 2 2019 INTERNAL AUDIT PLAN 3-4 COMPLETED PROJECTS 5-8 CONTINOUS AUDITING 9-10 PROJECTS IN PROGRESS 11-14 SPECIAL REQUESTS AND EMERGING ISSUES 15-20 EXTERNAL AUDIT COORDINATION 21 STATUS OF OUTSTANDING FOLLOW-UP 22-23 OTHER PROJECTS 24 STAFF TRAINING 25 STAFF PROFILES 26 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY 1, 2019 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2019 2019 INTERNAL AUDIT PLAN Project Name Quarter (Hours) VFOs * Consulting Data Analytics Consulting 1 200 5,6 Third Party Risk Assessment 4 160 1,2 Continuous Auditing Accounts Payable 3 250 1,2 Accounts Receivable 3 250 1,2 Payroll Expense 2 400 1,2 Procurement Card 1 100 1,2 Revenue Collection 1 250 1 Contract Audits CNG Bus Purchase 3 80 4,5,6 Commuter Coach Purchase 2 300 4,6,8 Common Area Maintenance – Tower City 1 200 4,6,8 Health Care Benefits 2 300 1,2 Marketing Consultant 4 200 1,2 Red Line West Track Replacement 4 300 4,5,6 Supplemental Paratransit Service 2 400 1,4 Shop Uniforms 1 100 1,4,8 Tower City Track Replacement 4 300 4,5,6 External Audits Financial Audit Support 1 320 2 Safety System Program Plan 4 160 4,8,9 System Security Plan 4 160 4,8,9 Information Technology Audits Change and Patch Management 2 200
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan
    The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Issued January 2020 1 REVISION HISTORY EDITION DATE ISSUED REASON FOR CHANGE 1.0 01/31/2020 Original 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 7 II. ANNUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE ................................................................................................... 13 III. SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS ........................................................................................... 14 IV. SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGET COORDINATION ............................................................. 15 1.0 SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY ................................................................................................ 16 1.1 Safety Management Policy Statement ........................................................................................... 16 1.2 Safety Management Policy Communication .................................................................................. 19 1.2.1 Intranet ............................................................................................................................................. 19 1.2.2 Executive Safety Committee ........................................................................................................ 20 1.2.3 District Safety Committees...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]