DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register / Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 32737 (f) Compliance (g) Maintenance or Inspection Program identified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this Comply with this AD within the Revision AD. For airplanes that have exceeded the CMR interval, in total flight hours (FHs), for compliance times specified, unless already Within 30 days after the effective date of a required CMR item, the associated task this AD, revise the existing maintenance or done. must be done before further flight after inspection program, as applicable, to revision of the maintenance or inspection incorporate the CMR item information program. Figure 1 to paragraph (g) - CMR items CMR item Related MRBR CMR Applicability Task Task description number item number interval APL ENG Operationally check (BITE check) the digital 22-020-00 flight control system (DFCS) speed trim/stab 22-CMR-01 OPC 6,000 FH ALL ALL (MPD number) trim discretes and aileron/elevator actuator availability. Operationally check the stabilizer trim enable 22-030-00 22-CMR-02 OPC 41,000 FH ALL ALL ground path and autopilot arm cutout switch - (MPD number) S272 Pole 2. Operationally check the primary and 27-117-00 27-CMR-09 OPC 12,000 FH ALL ALL secondary aisle stand stabilizer trim cutout (MPD number) switches. Note 1 to paragraph (g): The CMR tasks DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DATES: Effective Date: Pursuant to and intervals specified in figure 1 to section 304(b) of the National Marine paragraph (g) of this AD correspond to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. items identified in Boeing Certification Administration 1434(b)), the designation and Maintenance Requirements Document regulations shall take effect and become D626A011–9–03, dated July 2020. The 15 CFR Part 922 final after the close of a review period information in both sources is identical. of forty-five days of continuous session [Docket No. 210608–0125] (h) Alternative Methods of Compliance of Congress, beginning on the date on (AMOCs) which this federal rulemaking is RIN 0648–BG01 published, unless the Governor of the (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, State of Wisconsin certifies to the FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast National Secretary of Commerce during that same for this AD, if requested using the procedures Marine Sanctuary Designation; Final review period that the designation or found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with Regulations 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your any of its terms is unacceptable, in principal inspector or responsible Flight AGENCY: Office of National Marine which case the designation or any Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean unacceptable term shall not take effect. information directly to the manager of the Service (NOS), National Oceanic and The public can track days on certification office, send it to the attention of Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Congressional session at the following the person identified in Related Information. Department of Commerce (DOC). website: https://www.congress.gov/days- Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM- ACTION: Final rule. in-session. NOAA will publish an [email protected]. announcement of the effective date of (2) Before using any approved AMOC, SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and the final regulations in the Federal notify your appropriate principal inspector, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Register. or lacking a principal inspector, the manager issues final regulations to implement NOAA is staying the effective date of of the responsible Flight Standards Office. the designation of the Wisconsin § 922.213(a)(2), which prohibits Shipwreck Coast National Marine grappling into or anchoring on (i) Related Information Sanctuary (WSCNMS). The shipwreck sites, until October 1, 2023. For more information about this AD, approximately 962 square-mile area The purpose of this stay is detailed in contact Ken Fairhurst, Manager, Systems and encompasses a portion of the waters and Section II of this final rule. Equipment Section, FAA, Seattle ACO submerged lands of Lake Michigan ADDRESSES: Copies of the final Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, adjacent to Ozaukee, Sheboygan, environmental impact statement and WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3500; Manitowoc, and Kewaunee Counties. final management plan (FEIS/FMP) email: [email protected]. The area includes a nationally described in this rule and the record of (j) Material Incorporated by Reference significant collection of underwater decision (ROD) are available upon None. cultural resources, including 36 known request to Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast shipwrecks and about 59 suspected National Marine Sanctuary, One Issued on June 9, 2021. shipwrecks. Well preserved by Lake University Drive, Sheboygan, WI 53081, Ross Landes, Michigan’s cold, fresh water, the Attn: Russ Green, Regional Coordinator. Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations, shipwrecks in the WSCNMS possess The FEIS/FMP and Record of Decision Compliance & Airworthiness Division, exceptional historical, archaeological may be viewed and downloaded at Aircraft Certification Service. and recreational value. NOAA and the https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/wisconsin/. [FR Doc. 2021–13458 Filed 6–21–21; 4:15 pm] State of Wisconsin will co-manage FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russ BILLING CODE 4910–13–P WSCNMS. Green, Regional Coordinator, Office of VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:58 Jun 22, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM 23JNR1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES ER23JN21.020</GPH> 32738 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations National Marine Sanctuaries at 920– industry. In the process they brought tourism initiatives within the many 459–4425, [email protected], or hundreds of thousands of people to the communities that have embraced their Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast National Midwest and made possible the centuries-long maritime relationship Marine Sanctuary, One University dramatic growth of the region’s farms, with Lake Michigan, the Great Lakes Drive, Sheboygan, WI 53081, Attn: Russ cities, and industries. The Midwest, and region, and the nation; (c) enhance the Green, Regional Coordinator. indeed the American Nation, could not existing state management program; and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: have developed with such speed and (d) provide access to NOAA’s extended with such vast economic and social network of scientific expertise and I. Background consequences without the Great Lakes. technological resources, increase The National Marine Sanctuaries Act Twenty-one of the 36 shipwreck sites in research efforts, and provide an (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.) the sanctuary are listed on the National umbrella for the coordination of these authorizes the Secretary of Commerce Register of Historic Places. Many of the activities. The national marine (Secretary) to designate and protect as shipwrecks retain an unusual degree of sanctuary will also enhance existing national marine sanctuaries areas of the archeological and architectural integrity, educational initiatives and provide marine or Great Lakes environment that with several vessels nearly intact. Well additional programming and technology are of special national significance due preserved by Lake Michigan’s cold, for K–12, post-graduate, and the general to their conservation, recreational, fresh water, the shipwrecks in the public across the state. ecological, historical, scientific, WSCNMS possess exceptional cultural, archeological, educational, or historical, archaeological and C. Procedural History aesthetic qualities. Day-to-day recreational value. Additional 1. Sanctuary Nomination and Public management of national marine underwater cultural resources, such as Scoping sanctuaries has been delegated by the submerged aircraft, docks, piers, and On December 2, 2014, pursuant to Secretary to the Office of National isolated artifacts also exist, as does the Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) within the potential for prehistoric (pre-contact) section 304 of the NMSA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric sites and artifacts. Sanctuary Nomination Process (SNP; 79 Administration (NOAA). The primary FR 33851), Wisconsin Governor Scott B. Need for Action objective of the NMSA is to protect the Walker, on behalf of the State of sanctuary system’s biological and Establishing a national marine Wisconsin; the cities of Two Rivers, cultural resources, such as marine sanctuary in Wisconsin waters will Manitowoc, Sheboygan, and Port ecosystem, marine animals, historic complement and supplement existing Washington; and the counties of shipwrecks, and archaeological sites. state-led preservation efforts, research Ozaukee, Sheboygan, and Manitowoc, programs, and public outreach submitted a nomination asking NOAA A. Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast National initiatives. Threats to the nationally to consider designating this area of Marine Sanctuary significant underwater cultural Wisconsin’s Lake Michigan waters as a The approximately 962 square-mile resources in the area include both national marine sanctuary. The State of area designated as the Wisconsin natural processes and human activities. Wisconsin’s selection of this geographic Shipwreck Coast National Marine In some cases human activities can area for the nomination drew heavily Sanctuary (WSCNMS) encompasses a threaten the long term sustainability of from a 2008 report conducted by the portion of the waters
Recommended publications
  • Sherrill Genealogy

    Sherrill Genealogy

    THE SHERRILL GENEALOGY THE DESCENDANTS OF SAMUEL SHERRILL OF EAST HAMPTON, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK BY CHARLES HITCHCOCK SHERRILL SECOND AND REVISED EDITION COMPILED AND EDITED BY LOUIS EFFINGHAM de FOREST CoPnxG:e:T, 1932, :BY CHARLES IDTCHCOCK SHERRILL THE TUTTLE, MOREHOUSE & TAYLOR COMPANY, KEW KA.VEN, CONK. SHERRILL THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED TO MY SHERRILL ANCESTORS WHO SERVED THE STATE EITHER LOCALLY OR NATIONALLY AND TO MY DESCENDANTS WHO SHALL ALSO DO SO TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE.. Editorial Note . vu Introduction ......................................•... 1 First Generation ..................................... 24 Second Generation . .............••... 31 Third Generation ....................................• 34 Fourth Generation . •• 41 Fifth Generation . 58 Sixth Generation . 98 Seventh Generation ................................... 151 Eighth Generation . ............................. 201 Ninth Generation .................................... 229 Tenth Generation . .................. 236 Bibliography . ................. 237 Index of Persons . ............... 241 V EDITORIAL NOTE The first edition of this work was compiled by Charles Hitchcock Sherrill and published privately by him in the year 1894. In this second and revised edition General Sherrill has written the entire Introduction and First Generation which are signed with his name. The editor assumes the usual responsibility for the remainder of the book and hopes that it will be acceptable to the Sherrills and to his fellow genealogists. The arrangement of material is the one generally found in modem genealogies. Each head of a family is given a number, in a sequence beginning with the first settler who is No. 1. By looking ahead to the given number the succeeding generation will 4 be found. The superior or raised numbers ( as Jonathan ) indicate the degree of descent from the founder of the family in America. The usual abbreviations are used.
  • Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary

    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary

    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Management Plan DECEMBER 2016 | sanctuaries.noaa.gov/wisconsin/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator Kathryn D. Sullivan, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management National Ocean Service W. Russell Callender, Ph.D. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries John Armor, Director Matt Brookhart, Acting Deputy Director Cover Photos: Top: The schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Tamara Thomsen, Wisconsin Historical Society. Bottom: Photomosaic of the schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution - Advanced Imaging and Visualization Laboratory. 1 Abstract In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1434 et seq.), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that considers alternatives for the proposed designation of Wisconsin - Lake Michigan as a National Marine Sanctuary. The proposed action addresses NOAA’s responsibilities under the NMSA to identify, designate, and protect areas of the marine and Great Lakes environment with special national significance due to their conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, cultural, archaeological, educational, or aesthetic qualities as national marine sanctuaries. ONMS has developed five alternatives for the designation, and the DEIS evaluates the environmental consequences of each under NEPA. The DEIS also serves as a resource assessment under the NMSA, documenting present and potential uses of the areas considered in the alternatives.
  • Case 1:14-Cv-03280-JHR-KMW Document 46 Filed 04/13/21 Page 1 of 22 Pageid: 578

    Case 1:14-Cv-03280-JHR-KMW Document 46 Filed 04/13/21 Page 1 of 22 Pageid: 578

    Case 1:14-cv-03280-JHR-KMW Document 46 Filed 04/13/21 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 578 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC WRECK SALVAGE, LLC : Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 1:14-CV-03280 : v. : OPINION : THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL : known as the S.S. Carolina, which sank in : 1918, her engines, tackle, appurtenances and : Cargo, : : Defendant. : This matter arises from the Motion to Intervene in the above-captioned case filed by prospective intervenor Rustin Cassway, the vessel RV Explorer and its owner, Research Vessel Explorer, LLC (collectively “Cassway”) [Dkt. 38] and Plaintiff Atlantic Wreck Salvage’s (“AWS”) response and request for sanctions [Dkt. 43]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Cassway’s Motion to Intervene, and declines to award sanctions. I. Factual Background and Procedural History Cassway seeks to intervene in the above-referenced case, where this Court entered default judgment in favor of AWS on July 19, 2017. [Dkt. 21]. The above-captioned case concerns the salvage rights to the wreck of the S.S. Carolina (“the Carolina”). The Carolina was a passenger and cargo steam ship sunk by German gunfire on June 2, 1918 approximately 94 miles southeast of Sandy Hook, New Jersey. [Cassway Mot., Dkt. 38-1 at 5]. The Carolina’s wreck rested unclaimed on the floor of the Atlantic Ocean until John Chatterton located the wreck in 1995 and filed a lawsuit in this Court on November 1, 1995 to arrest the Carolina. See John B. Chatterton v. S.S. Carolina, The Wrecked and Abandoned 1 Case 1:14-cv-03280-JHR-KMW Document 46 Filed 04/13/21 Page 2 of 22 PageID: 579 Vessel, etc., No.
  • Chicago Shipwrecks

    Chicago Shipwrecks

    Southern New Hampshire University Chicago Shipwrecks Disasters and their Impact on Maritime Law A Capstone Project Submitted to the College of Online and Continuing Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Arts in History By Shannon Lange Evanston, Illinois Submitted June, 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Shannon Lange All Rights Reserved ii Student: Shannon Lange I certify that this student has met the requirements for formatting the capstone project and that this project is suitable for preservation in the University Archive. June 7, 2017 __________________________________________ _______________ Southern New Hampshire University Date College of Online and Continuing Education iii Abstract The shipwreck and maritime history of the Illinois region of Lake Michigan was one wrought with tragedy and shaped the laws of the shipping industry for the future. What has become known as the ‘Shipwreck Era’ of 1825-1925 hosts the most well-known tragedies of Lake Michigan. Ships such as the Lady Elgin, Eastland, and Rouse Simmons rest as the focal points of most research due to the tragic yet popular nature of their respective disasters. A qualitative analysis into the archival documents at Newberry Library, Manitowoc Maritime Museum and the Winnetka Historical Society along the western lakeshore, explorations of individual shipwrecks are able to be compiled into a digital exhibit and foundation of a boat tour to fully explore the wreckage that remains at the bottom of the lake. iv Dedication Special thank you and dedication to Kathleen Schmidt, for taking me on my first kayak trip in Lake Michigan to see my first sunken ship. v Table of Contents Abstract .........................................................................................................................................
  • Chapter 3, Historical and Cultural Resources

    Chapter 3, Historical and Cultural Resources

    Door County Comprehensive and Farmland Preservation Plan 2035: Volume II, Resource Report CHAPTER 3: HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 16 | Chapter 3: Historical and Cultural Resources Door County Comprehensive and Farmland Preservation Plan 2035: Volume II, Resource Report INTRODUCTION This chapter begins by briefly discussing Door County’s “community character,” which is intertwined with many of the county’s historical and cultural resources. It then provides a brief history of the county’s residents and its development, followed by an inventory of the historical resources in Door County. Included are discussion of the county’s historical associations; the area’s maritime history and maritime museums, lighthouses, and shipwrecks; general museums; archaeological sites; sites on the state and/or federal historic registries; and cemeteries. Finally, this chapter provides an inventory of cultural resources, such as cultural organizations, educational and cultural opportunities, visual and performing arts groups and venues, and festivals. COMMUNITY CHARACTER Community character is defined by a variety of sometimes intangible factors, including the people living in the area, the visual character of the area, and the quality of life and experiences offered to residents and visitors. Door County’s community character was ranked as either the county’s highest or second- highest asset during the public input exercises conducted at the county-wide visioning sessions held between 2006 and 2007. As is evidenced by the lists below of responses from residents at those visioning meetings, all aspects of community character – the people, the visual attributes, and the general quality of life as well as the county’s specific historical and cultural resources – define or exemplify life in Door County.
  • Small Boats on a Big Lake: Underwater Archaeological Investigations of Wisconsin’S Trading Fleet 2007-2009

    Small Boats on a Big Lake: Underwater Archaeological Investigations of Wisconsin’S Trading Fleet 2007-2009

    Small Boats on a Big Lake: Underwater Archaeological Investigations of Wisconsin’s Trading Fleet 2007-2009 State Archaeology and Maritime Preservation Technical Report Series #10-001 Keith N. Meverden and Tamara L. Thomsen ii Funded by grants from the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, National Sea Grant College Program, and the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s Transportation Economics Assistance program. This report was prepared by the Wisconsin Historical Society. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, the National Sea Grant College Program, or the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The Big Bay Sloop was listed on the National Register of Historic Places on 14 January 2009. The Schooner Byron was listed on the National Register of Historic Places on 20 May 2009. The Green Bay Sloop was listed on the National Register of Historic Places On 18 November 2009. Nominations for the Schooners Gallinipper, Home, and Northerner are pending listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Cover photo: Wisconsin Historical Society archaeologists survey the wreck of the schooner Northerner off Port Washington, Wisconsin. Copyright © 2010 by Wisconsin Historical Society All rights reserved iii CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS…………………..………………………….. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………….. vii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………. ….. 1 Research Design and Methodology……………………… 3 2. LAKESHORING, TRADING, AND LAKE MICHIGAN MERCHANT SAIL………………………………………….. 5 Sloops…………………………………………………… 7 Schooners……………………………………………….. 8 Merchant Sail on Lake Michigan………………………. 12 3. THE BIG BAY SLOOP……………………………………... 14 The Mackinaw Boat……………………………………. 14 Site Description………………………………………… 16 4. THE GREEN BAY SLOOP………………………………… 26 Site Description………………………………………… 27 5. THE SCHOONER GALLINIPPER ………………………… 35 Site Description………………………………………… 44 6.
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America

    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America

    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
  • SEAFARING WOMEN: an Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships

    SEAFARING WOMEN: an Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships

    SEAFARING WOMEN: An Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships by R. Laurel Seaborn April, 2014 Director of Thesis/Dissertation: Dr. Lynn Harris Major Department: Department of History, Program in Maritime Studies ABSTRACT During the 19th century, women went to sea on sailing ships. Wives and family accompanied captains on their voyages from New England. They wrote journals and letters that detailed their life on board, adventures in foreign ports, and feelings of separation from family left behind. Although the women kept separate from the sailors as class and social status dictated, they contributed as nannies, nurses and navigators when required. Examination of the historical documents, ship cabin plans, and photos of those interiors, as well as looking at surviving ships, such as the whaleship Charles W. Morgan, provided evidence of the objects women brought and used on board. The investigation from a gendered perspective of the extant material culture, and shipwreck site reports laid the groundwork for finding potential archaeological diagnostics of women living on board. SEAFARING WOMEN: An Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships A Thesis/Dissertation Presented To the Faculty of the Department of Department Name Here East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by R. Laurel Seaborn April, 2014 © R. Laurel Seaborn, 2014 SEAFARING WOMEN: An Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships by R. Laurel Seaborn APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS:_________________________________________________________ Dr.
  • Keith N. Meverden, Tamara L. Thomsen, and John O

    Keith N. Meverden, Tamara L. Thomsen, and John O

    Wheat Chaff and Coal Dust: Underw ater Archaeologicallnvestigations of the Grain Schooners Daniel Lyons and Kate Kelly State Archaeology and Maritime Preservation Program Technical Report Series 006-002 W I S CONS I N I HISTORICAL I SOC IETY Keith N. Meverden, Tamara L. Thomsen, and John O. Jensen Funded by the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute and the National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, and the State of Wisconsin, Grant ¹ NA16RG2257; the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under the Coastal Zone Management Act, Grant ¹ NA03NOS4190106, and the Wisconsin Department of Transportation Enhancementsprogram. This report was prepared by the Wisconsin Historical Society under award ¹ C/C-7 from the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, award ¹ 84003-004.21 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, and under award ¹ 5101-02-75 from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The statements,findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, or the National Sea Grant College Program. i'va, [73 wisccrmv cwsnc i 'd >Id4 IVlmacavzxrPmxmea ~ I The Daniel Lyons was listed on the National Register of Historic Places on 3 October 2007. The Kate Kelly was listed on the National Register of Historic Places on 21 November 2007. Cover photo: The Daniel Lyons' bow in 110 feet of water, nine miles northeast of Algoma, Wisconsin.
  • Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California

    Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California

    Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California by Michael L. Blum Date: Approved: Dr. Michael K. Orbach, Adviser Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University May 2015 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... viii LIST OF DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................ x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... xiii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. STUDY APPROACH: A TOTAL ECOLOGY OF SURFING ................................................. 5 2.1 The Biophysical Ecology ...................................................................................................... 5 2.2 The Human Ecology ............................................................................................................
  • Tori L. Galloway CV

    Tori L. Galloway CV

    Tori L. Galloway CV October 1st, 2020 Tori L. Galloway Office Address: Home Address: Center for Underwater Science 1607 S. College Ave 1025 E 7th Street, SPH 058 Bloomington, Indiana 47403 Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana 47405 Cell: (765)661-3579 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Indiana University –Bloomington Department of Anthropology, In Progress B.A. Indiana University – Bloomington Anthropology with Honors; Underwater Archaeology with High Distinction, 2019 Certificate Indiana University – Bloomington Underwater Resource Management, 2019 ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2019-present Visiting Lecturer Center for Underwater Science Department of Kinesiology School of Public Health, Indiana University –Bloomington 2019 Maritime Archaeology Fellow Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology Wisconsin Historical Society 2016-2019 Research Assistant Center for Underwater Science School of Public Health, Indiana University – Bloomington 2018 Maritime Heritage Program Intern Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1 Tori L. Galloway CV REFERED PUBLICATIONS In-Press Tori L. Galloway and Caitlin N. Zant. “Flat Bottomed Girls: A Regional Analysis of Scow Schooners”. Society for American Archaeology Manuscript, 2020. In-Press Tori L. Galloway, Charles D. Beeker, Denise Jaffke, Claudia C. Johnson. Archaeological Investigations at La Isabela, Dominican Republic. Advisory Council for Underwater Archaeology. Society for Historical Archaeology, 2020. 2019 Samuel I. Haskell, Tori L. Galloway. “30 Years Later: Revisiting the 1733 San Pedro Underwater Archaeological Preserve and San Felipe Shipwreck Sites in the Florida Keys.” Society for Historical Archaeology. POSTERS 2019 Tori L. Galloway, Samuel I. Haskell, Matthew Lawrence. “Documenting Historic Shipwrecks in the 21st Century: Using New and Old Data to Support Monitoring of the 1733 San Pedro and San Felipe.” Society for Historical Archaeology.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900

    \ 3i\a \ 3o\A - * \ c o l o M L;1/NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) Wisconsin Word Processing Format (Approved 1/92) United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register o f Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900A). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. L Name of Property historic name Grace A. Chamon Shipwreck (Canaller) other names/site number 47M I-0551 2. Location street & number 12.75 miles northeast of the Bender Park boat launch, in Lake N/A not for publication Michigan city or town Town of Oak Creek X vicinity state Wisconsin_________ code WI county Milwaukee__________________code 079 zipcode 53154 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.